Page 1

Coroner Sara Hinchey J 17-4-2017

Coroners Court of Victoria
65 Kavanagh Street, Southbank, VIC 3006
5 Phone: 1300 309 519 Calling from overseas: (+61 3) 8688 0700
Fax: 1300 546 989
General enquires (including submissions of all Forms): courtadmin@coronerscourt.vic.gov.au
Coronial Admissions and Enquires Office: cae@coronerscourt.vic.gov.au

10 Ref: 20170417-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supllement 5

+COMPLAINT
Madam,
Further to my 13 February 2017 submission and Supplement 1 and Supplement 2 of 13-
4-2017, Supplement 3+COMPLAINT, Supplement 4+COMPLAINT I hold it appropriate to
15 provide this Supplement 5+COMPLAINT
My submission that was marked *** CONFIDENTIAL *** nevertheless was again
intercepted by Agents.DOJ@justice.vic.gov.au and as such this test to check if this were
to eventuate again clearly proves it continues to occur. (see below screen prints)
20 .
I understand from todays news bulletins that the state government is going to increase funding
for mental health issues by about $30 million, considering that about 10 murders a year are
committed by people suffering mental health issues.
I alluded to the mental health issue in previous submissions supplements also. The problem is
25 that at time people who appear to be quite sane are then held mentally incompetent at the time of
the murder(s). And this may question if the system allows it to be to easy that a person otherwise
being deemed a healthy normal person only for the crime committed is deemed to be suffering
from mental health issues.
.
30 I understood of a records of a case where the expert witnesses gave evidence to what they
established as being the problems citing certain issues, but the trail judge so to say threw out of
the window their evidence making clear that the facts the expert witnesses relied upon was fed by
the accused to them and were totally in conflict to the evidence that was before the court.
In my view anyone who takes the life of an innocent person may suffer a mental health problem
35 not to accept that they have no right to take the life of another human being but to use this excuse
of a mental health issue as an excuse to get a criminal off I hold is absurd.
We do have a number of people who have mental health problems but that is something that
ordinary is known all along and not just a mere claim to try to get a criminal of the hook. We
seem to lack any responsibility/accountability for caring for the real mental health patients in a
40 dignified manner. And there lies also a problem. Those suffering real mental health problems
then can be a stranger in the midst of a public event with thousands of people around them,
because they feel isolated and deserted. The people around them do not even notice this isolated
person. As much as at times someone whom died can be dead for 9 years in a house and even the
neighbour not realising that the person has died in their home.
45 It is easy for the government so to say throw money at agencies, as they do with the Department
of Human services, when children happen to die blaming insufficient funding and lack of social
workers, whereas in reality it is the system itself is at fault.
Page 1 17-4-2017 COMPLAINT G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax
0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com
 Page 2
For example, how on earth can the Childrens Court continue to place children in care of the
Department of Human Services (the Secretary to be correct) when there is no one in the first
place to care for them as they cannot care for the children already in its care appropriately! As
the Ombudsman upheld my complaint in 1988 against the Department of Human Services about
5 the lack of proper care such as Allambie in Burwood (as it then was) it must be clear I have been
on this for decades. We got young girls prostituting themselves this even so they are supposed to
be under the care of the Department of Human services. No wonder that they end up dead then.
When someone claims mental health problems as being some form of mitigating circumstances
then let us not do the so to say Allan Bond excuse of having mental health problems, as I
10 understood it, and so got off when he was all along involved in negotiating million dollar
contracts.
What is happening is that the real mental health services hare generally denied proper support by
the Government and monies are wanting to perhaps just keep some people in a job and that is it.
Those who are in the business of complaining are so because it keeps them in a job and so they
15 will even fabricate excuses for this. They are not interested in seeking to resolve anything,
because after all to resolve or even minimize problems may put them out of a job.
Sentences are ordinary not only to punish the offender but also to be a deterrent to others. When
however the courts are too eager to accept any nonsense as an excuse as a health problem then it
is neither a proper sentence nor any deterrent to others, in fact others may use this to set up their
20 own alibi to commit a contemplated murder.
Society has gone a long way from hanging a horse thief at the nearest tree, as rightfully the
accused should be able to have his say in court.
Hansard 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
25 Mr. OCONNOR.-No, it would not; and, as an honorable member reminds me, there is a decision on the
point. All that is intended is that there shall be some process of law by which the parties accused must be
heard.
Mr. HIGGINS.-Both sides heard.
Mr. OCONNOR.-Yes; and the process of law within that principle may be [start page 689] anything
30 the state thinks fit. This provision simply assures that there shall be some form by which a person
accused will have an opportunity of stating his case before being deprived of his liberty. Is not that a
first principle in criminal law now? I cannot understand any one objecting to this proposal.
END QUOTE

35 Yet on the other hand we have the unconstitutional Infringement act and Infringement Court
where as I exposed an accused may be issued with a summons exceeding 80 kilometres an hour
and then afterwards, unbeknown to the accused, the police change it to exceeding 100 kilometres
an hour and then the Infringement court hands down a unilateral order fining the person for
exceeding 100 kilometres an hour.
40 As His Honour Mullaly J on 31 October 2015 stated a Magistrates Court of Victoria doesnt
need evidence to convict an accused. Oops, we are back to the hanging of the horse thief system!
As long as we have politicians and judicial officers fooling around with the constitutional and
other legal rights of people and so robbing them of it, we will end up with victims becoming
aggrieved and well then contemplating suicide/murder and even mass murder.
45 My computer screen record shows (including the *** CONFIDENTIAL *** submission of
16 April 2017) to be responded to by Agents.DOJ@justice.vic.gov.au:

Page 2 17-4-2017 COMPLAINT G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax
0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com
 Page 3

(The image above had unrelated confidential details cut out.)

QUOTE 16-4-2017 EMAIL TO THE CORONERS COURT WITH ATTACHMENT 20170416-G. H. Schorel-
5 Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 4+COMPLAINT
see attachment 20170416-G. H. Schorel-
Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner
Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 4+COMPLAINT
From Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
To courtadmin@coronerscourt.vic.gov.au
Cc Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
Reply-To Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
Date Sun 15:50

10 20170416-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-

Supplement 4 COMPLAINT.pdf

Without prejudice

Coroner Sara Hinchey J 16-4-2017

Coroners Court of Victoria

15 65 Kavanagh Street, Southbank, VIC 3006

Phone: 1300 309 519 Calling from overseas: (+61 3) 8688 0700
Fax: 1300 546 989

General enquires (including submissions of all Forms): courtadmin@coronerscourt.vic.gov.au

Coronial Admissions and Enquires Office: cae@coronerscourt.vic.gov.au

20
Ref: 20170416-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supllement 2

*** CONFIDENTIAL ***

Madam,
see attachment 20170416-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-
25 Supplement 4+COMPLAINT

Page 3 17-4-2017 COMPLAINT G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax
0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com
 Page 4
The last thing desperate people need is a court to blatantly disregard the proper
judicial system being applied.

The document can be downloaded from:

https://www.scribd.com/document/345291744/20170416-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
5 B-Re-SUBMISSION-to-Coroner-Sara-Hinchey-J-Supplement-4-COMPLAINT

--
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL
107 Graham Road
10 Viewbank 3084, Victoria, Australia

Author of INSPECTOR-RIKATI books on certain constitutional and other legal issues.

THE MORAL OF A SOCIETY CAN BE MEASURED BY HOW IT PROVIDES FOR THE DISABLED
15
END QUOTE 16-4-2017 EMAIL TO THE CORONERS COURT WITH ATTACHMENT 20170416-G. H.
Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement 4+COMPLAINT

QUOTE
20 Re: see attachment 20170416-G. H.
Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to
Coroner Sara Hinchey J-Supplement
4+COMPLAINT
From Agents.DOJ@justice.vic.gov.au
To Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
Date Sun 15:50
Priority Normal

25 Thank you for your email.

Your email has been logged and we will attend to your request as soon as
possible.
Your patience is greatly appreciated.
30
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
The content of this e-mail and any attachments may be private and confidential,
intended only for use of the individual or entity named. If you are not the intended
35 recipient of this message you must not read, forward, print, copy, disclose, use or
store in any way the information this e-mail or any attachment contains.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete
or destroy all copies of this e-mail and any attachments.
Our organisation respects the privacy of individuals. For a copy of our privacy policy
40 please go to our website or contact us.
END QUOTE

In view of the above I certainly wouldnt trust the Coroners Court protecting those who make
submissions, let alone CONFIDENTIAL submissions, and I view this is a state of dissolution to
45 many at the very least.
.
How can the alleged accused or persons suspected of having been involved in a crime make any
CONFIDENTIAL submission where this may for example reveal details of having committed
another crime elsewhere as to prove not having been involved in the dead then subject to a
50 coroners inquest? After all, the Government now could use this CONFIDENTIAL submission
to pursue the person for a different crime having access to the CONFIDENTIAL submission
Page 4 17-4-2017 COMPLAINT G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax
0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com
 Page 5
before the coroner can even determine if the CONFIDENTIAL submission is or is not accepted
to be within the provisions of a CONFIDENTIAL submission.
No journalist could now embark upon an expedition to expose the truth as known to him/her
without risking to be vilified if he was to be incorrect because the government has prior access to
5 any CONFIDENTIAL submission and may very well (accidentally it will of course claim)
release such CONFIDENTIAL submission to the public before the coroner can issue orders to
prevent publication.
In my view if you cannot grasp the seriousness of this then quite frankly you should get yourself
10 a job where legalities are not involved, perhaps selling fish and chips? People are entitled to
expect that a coroner will above all apply and enforce the legal system and so their constitutional
and other legal rights. People who are suspects in any coronial inquest are entitled to have an
impartial, unbiased coroner dealing with issues without any outside interference and this I view I
have established currently is not applicable nor provided and one has to question for how long
15 this has been going on. They very well may question also of the Government does make amend
to any coronial inquest findings and orders as long as (so reported by Phillips J) continue to have
access to court computers as some private company does at least to the Magistrates Court of
Victoria records under the Victorian Government trademark Civic Compliance Victoria.
As a (now retired) Professional Advocate I had the immunities as a solicitor representing a client
20 before the Supreme Court of Victoria but not being an Officer of the Court I have the ability to
expose and denounce the sheer abuse of the legal processes, which an Officer of the Court
basically is prevented to do or face the risk to be disciplined and denied acting as a legal
practitioner. His Honour Phillips J obviously was well aware of the governments incursions into
the Courts judicial processes but waited until retirement before revealing it. That shows that the
25 judiciary are too afraid to speak up and rather deny those aggrieved justice. I am however not
afraid to expose the rot.
Judicial officers ought to understand that when they deal with legal issues, often beyond the
comprehension of the persons appearing before the judicial officer, and they have the
30 feeling/impression that the judicial officer so to say was in the pocket of the government then
justice itself is the big loser. It is the community that then distrust, and I view rightfully, a
judicial officer who so to say sells himself/herself out to the highest bidder. When you have a
judge making clear to keep silent until retirement then clearly this judge all along was aware of
inappropriate conduct by the government and who knows to what extend? Did the judge himself
35 encounter having orders/judgments revised by the Government of the Day without his
knowledge/consent? Surely a judge isnt going to make claim after serving for so many years at
the bench unless having so to say evidence to prove his claims in case the Government were to
go after him? As such I view it can safely be stated the unlawful interferences are occurring. As I
view peoples lives may depend upon the truth coming out and something drastically is done a
40 proper Royal Commission is required to investigate the total extend of such governments
unconstitutional and unlawful interferences. Why on earth you allowed this to continue is beyond
me! You cannot discover the truth is you are yourself as it appears to me involved in corrupting
the legal processes by allowing unlawful interferences with submissions.
45 In case this Supplement 5 +COMPLAINT is kept from you I will publish it also on the internet
as well as notify the media, to ensure it is not concealed from the public.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

50 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

(Our name is our motto!)

Page 5 17-4-2017 COMPLAINT G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax
0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com