You are on page 1of 7

CURRENT CONCEPTS

The Distal Interosseous Membrane: Current Concepts


in Wrist Anatomy and Biomechanics
Hisao Moritomo, MD, PhD

The distal interosseous membrane (DIOM) of the forearm acts as a secondary stabilizer of
the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) when the dorsal and palmar radioulnar ligaments of the
triangular fibrocartilage complex are cut. Recent anatomical studies revealed that thickness
of the DIOM varies widely among specimens and the distal oblique bundle (DOB) exists
within the DIOM in 40% of specimens. The DOB originates from the distal one-sixth of the
ulnar shaft and runs distally to insert on the inferior rim of the sigmoid notch of the radius.
The mean thickness of the DIOM without a DOB was 0.4 mm, which was significantly
thinner than 1.2 mm with a DOB. Biomechanical studies have shown that the DOB is an
isometric stabilizer of the forearm during pronosupination. The presence of a DOB was
shown to have a significant impact on DRUJ stability. Innate DRUJ laxity in the neutral
forearm position was greater in the group without a DOB than in the group with a DOB.
Ulnar shortening with the osteotomy performed proximal to the attachment of the DIOM
had a more favorable effect on stability of the DRUJ compared with the effect of distal
osteotomy, especially in the presence of a DOB. The longitudinal resistance to ulnar
shortening was significantly greater in proximal shortening than in distal shortening. It also
suggested that the DIOM is of great importance in the management of concomitant ulnar-side
injuries in distal radius fracture. (J Hand Surg 2012;37A:15011507. Copyright 2012 by
the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.)
Key words Interosseous membrane, distal radioulnar joint, anatomy, biomechanics,
instability.

(IOM) of the fore- DRUJ, and indicated that the distal membranous por-

T
HE INTEROSSEOUS MEMBRANE
arm is a stout ligamentous complex linking the tion of the IOM acted as a secondary stabilizer of the
radius to the ulna. The IOM reportedly consists DRUJ when the dorsal and palmar radioulnar ligaments
of distal membranous, middle ligamentous, and proxi- of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) were
mal membranous portions. Each portion includes sev- cut. Recently, anatomical variation of the distal IOM
eral ligamentous components. Some investigators have (DIOM) and the exact fiber responsible for its function
reported that the distal membranous portion stabilizes have been described.
the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). Watanabe et al1 and
Kihara et al2 performed a biomechanical cadaver study ANATOMY OF THE DIOM
to determine the role of the stabilizing structures of the
The DIOM is on the distal side of the middle ligamen-
From the Department of Physical Therapy, Osaka Yukioka College of Health Science, Osaka, Japan. tous complex, spanning the radius and ulna under the
Received for publication February 15, 2012; accepted in revised form April 27, 2012.
region of the pronator quadratus muscle. A hole exists
Current Concepts

in that portion, through which the interosseous artery


No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly or indirectly to the
subject of this article. passes. Noda et al3 reported anatomical variation of the
Corresponding author: Hisao Moritomo, MD, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy, Osaka
DIOM. The authors found that thickness of the DIOM
Yukioka College of Health Science, Sojiji 1-1-41, Ibaragi-shi, Osaka 567-0801 Japan; e-mail: varied widely among specimens, and identified the dis-
hisao-moritomo@yukioka-u.ac.jp. tal oblique bundle (DOB) in 12 of 30 specimens (40%)
0363-5023/12/37A07-0036$36.00/0 (Figs. 1, 2). The DOB is an obvious thick fiber running
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.04.037
within the DIOM that originates from the distal one-

ASSH Published by Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved. 1501


1502 DISTAL INTEROSSEOUS MEMBRANE

FIGURE 2: Thin DIOM (arrow). Obvious DOB does not exist.


FIGURE 1: An obvious thick fiber bundle of the DOB from R, radius; U, ulna.
the DIOM (white arrows). R, radius; U, ulna. (From Kitamura
T, Moritomo H, Arimitsu S, Berglund LJ, Zhao KD, An KN,
et al. The biomechanical effect of the distal interosseous
membrane on distal radioulnar joint stability. J Hand Surg
reported that the DOB showed variations (Fig. 3). In 2
2011;36A:1626 1630. Reprinted with permission of Elsevier.) of the 4 specimens in which a DOB was present, the
DOB was linear and clearly separate from the mem-
brane portion of the DIOM. In another specimen with a
sixth of the ulnar shaft and runs distally to insert on the DOB, a thick fiber bundle was visible only in the
inferior rim of the sigmoid notch of the radius. The proximal portion of the DIOM and spread in a fan shape
mean width is 4.4 mm (range, 2 6 mm) and mean distally. In another specimen, the DOB was wide and
thickness is 1.5 mm (range, 0.52.6 mm). The fibers occupied almost the whole DIOM. The mean thickness
blend into the capsular tissue of the DRUJ. Further- of the DIOM among the 10 specimens was 0.7 mm
more, some fibers extend more distally along the ante- (range, 0.51.3 mm). The mean thickness of the 6
rior and posterior ridges of the sigmoid notch, so the specimens without a DOB was 0.4 mm (range, 0.3 0.5
DOB shows continuity with the dorsal and palmar mm), whereas the mean thickness of the 4 specimens
radioulnar ligaments of the TFCC. Kitamura et al4 with a DOB was 1.2 mm (range, 1.0 1.3 mm). There
reported that the dimensions of the DIOM varied was a statistically significant difference in the thickness
widely among 10 fresh specimens. In 4 specimens, an of the DIOM between the groups with and without a
obvious thick fiber bundle that was the DOB existed DOB.
Current Concepts

within the DIOM, whereas in 6 specimens an obvious Another variation in the anatomy of the DIOM is the
thick fiber was not evident within the DIOM. They distal radioulnar tract, described by Gabl et al5 (Fig. 4).
reported that the DOB originated from the distal ulna 54 The distal radioulnar tract extends from the radial shaft
mm (on average; range, 50 57 mm) proximal to the proximally to the dorsal capsule of the distal radioulnar
ulnar head, which was 21% of the total ulnar length joint distally. The distal radioulnar tract is located dorsal
from the ulnar styloid. The DOB inserted on the dorsal to the DOB, which extends from the ulnar shaft prox-
inferior rim of the sigmoid notch of the radius, approx- imally to the distal radius distally; therefore, these 2
imately 35 mm from the radial styloid, which was 15% fibers run opposite each other. The tract originates from
of the total radial length from the radial styloid. They the radius 22 mm proximal to the distal dorsal corner of

JHS Vol A, July


DISTAL INTEROSSEOUS MEMBRANE 1503

FIGURE 3: Anatomical variation of the DIOM. A The DOB does not exist. B The DOB is linear and clearly separate from the
membrane portion of the DIOM. C A thick fiber bundle is visible only in the proximal portion of the DIOM and is spread in a fan
shape distally. D The DOB is wide and occupies almost the whole DIOM.

the sigmoid notch. Distally, it inserts at the capsule band, and DOB) had little change in length during
of the DRUJ. There is considerable variation in shape. forearm rotation, with their ulnar attachments lo-
The tract is 8 mm wide (range, 4 12 mm), 31 mm long cated almost on the axis of forearm rotation (Fig.
(range, 2550 mm), and 1.0 mm thick (range 0.6 1.3 5). The 2 proximal ligaments (proximal oblique
mm). The distal radioulnar tract is taut in pronation and cord and dorsal oblique accessory cord) changed
loose in supination, which means that this fiber is not substantially in length, with their attachments out
isometric. It was suggested that during pronation, the of the course of the axis. The authors suggested
tract protects the ulnar head in a sling. that the distal 3 ligaments of the IOM are essen-
tially isometric stabilizers of the forearm.
BIOMECHANICS OF THE DIOM
Current Concepts

Length change during pronosupination Relationship between anatomical variation of the DIOM and
Moritomo et al6 investigated changes in the length of DRUJ laxity
the IOM during forearm rotation in vivo. In that study, It is well known that individual variation exists in
the author calculated the 3-dimensional lengths of the 5 normal DRUJ laxity. Kitamura et al4 investigated
ligaments in the IOM between attachments during fore- whether innate DRUJ laxity is influenced by the ana-
arm rotation using a markerless bone registration tech- tomical variation of the DIOM. The researchers used 10
nique. They also examined relationships between the fresh-frozen cadaver upper extremities in the study.
axis of forearm rotation and each ligament, and found They performed testing by translating the radius in
that the distal 3 ligaments (central band, accessory volar and dorsal directions relative to the ulna in neutral

JHS Vol A, July


1504 DISTAL INTEROSSEOUS MEMBRANE

FIGURE 4: The distal radioulnar tract (arrow) extends from


the radial shaft proximally to the dorsal capsule of the distal
radioulnar joint distally. The distal radioulnar tract and DOB
run opposite each other. R, radius; U, ulna. FIGURE 5: Relationship between the DOB and TFCC. The
DOB appears to form an isometric collateral ligament with the
TFCC to stabilize the forearm during forearm rotation because
forearm alignment, 60 pronation, and 60 supination. the ulnar insertions of the DOB, central band (CB), and
accessory band (AB) almost coincide with the course of the
Total translation of the radius was measured as DRUJ
axis of forearm rotation. (From Moritomo H, Noda K, Goto A,
laxity. After the experiment, they investigated the ana-
Murase T, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. Interosseous membrane
tomical variation of the DIOM, especially regarding the of the forearm: length change of ligaments during forearm
existence of the DOB. They compared DRUJ laxity rotation. J Hand Surg 2009;34A:685 691. Reprinted with
between groups with and without the DOB, and found permission of Elsevier.)
that the degree of displacement of the radius relative to
the ulna in the neutral forearm position was smaller
in the group with a DOB than in the group without a at the distal 25% portion of the ulna for that shortening,
DOB. This suggests that DRUJ laxity was greater in the so it is reasonable to infer that the DIOM was sectioned.
group without a DOB than in the group with a DOB. Arimitsu et al8 evaluated DRUJ laxity after ulnar short-
That study hypothesized that DRUJ laxity depends at ening osteotomy to quantify longitudinal resistance to
least in part on the presence and configuration of the ulnar shortening when the osteotomy was proximal or
DIOM. distal to the ulnar attachment of the DIOM. The authors
performed transverse osteotomy and ulnar shortening
Stabilizing effect of the DIOM on ulnar shortening proximal (proximal shortening) and distal (distal short-
Current Concepts

The ulnar shortening osteotomy is an effective treat- ening) to the ulnar attachment of the DIOM (Fig. 6).
ment for ulnar impaction syndrome. Although clinically They found that the longitudinal resistance to ulnar
it is well known that ulnar shortening improves DRUJ shortening was significantly greater in proximal short-
stability, the mechanism of that effect was unclear. ening than in distal shortening (P .01). They also
Nishiwaki et al7 used cadavers to examine the stabiliz- found that in proximal shortening, significantly greater
ing effect of the TFCC on ulnar shortening and found stability of the DRUJ was obtained with even 1 mm of
that 3 mm shortening or greater was required to obtain shortening compared with that of the control, whereas
a significant difference in distal radioulnar joint laxity distal shortening demonstrated significant improvement
(P .01). They removed 10 mm of bone in their testing in stability of the DRUJ only after shortening of 4 mm

JHS Vol A, July


DISTAL INTEROSSEOUS MEMBRANE 1505

FIGURE 6: The longitudinal resistance to ulnar shortening and stability of the DRUJ were significantly greater for proximal
shortening than for distal shortening (P .01).

or more. Significantly greater stability of the DRUJ was Sauv-Kapandji procedure, it is likely that the DIOM
achieved with proximal shortening than with distal has a more important role in the stability of the ulnar
shortening, and in specimens with a DOB rather than in head or ulnar stump (Fig. 7). The DIOM may explain
those without a DOB. They concluded that ulnar short- why some patients do not experience signs or symp-
ening with the osteotomy performed proximal to the toms of DRUJ instability, pain, or dysfunction after
attachment of the DIOM had a more favorable effect on TFCC disruption, or experience instability of the ulnar
stability of the DRUJ compared with the effect of distal stump after ulnar head resection.
osteotomy, especially in the presence of a DOB. Another biomechanical study demonstrated the sta-
bilizing effect of the DIOM on the DRUJ in ulnar
DISCUSSION shortening, especially in patients with a DOB. It seems
The form of the ulnar side of the human wrist represents plausible that increased DIOM tension accompanying
progressive evolutionary development. The embryolog- ulnar shortening after an osteotomy performed proxi-
ical and clinical material suggests that there is a tremen- mal to the attachment of the DIOM may improve the
dous variation in the development of the ulnar side of
stability of the DRUJ. Clinically, often there are diffi-
the wrist. Recent studies have demonstrated anatomical
culties in achieving the desired amount of ulnar short-
variation of the DIOM, and the DOB was recognized as
the exact fiber responsible for function of the DIOM. ening because of increased tension when approximating
Current Concepts

Biomechanical studies have shown that the DOB the ulnar bone ends after osteotomy. However, little
changed minimally in length during forearm rotation; attention has been given to the effect of the DIOM on
therefore, it was suggested to be an isometric stabilizer potential nonunion of the osteotomy. Recent data have
of the forearm. The presence of a DOB was also shown shown significant differences in longitudinal closure
to have a significant impact on DRUJ stability (P difficulty for proximal compared with distal osteotomy
.05). The TFCC is the primary soft tissue DRUJ stabi- sites, depending on the DIOM thickness.8 These results
lizer, and in normal situations, the influence of the suggest that a proximal osteotomy and a thicker DIOM
DIOM on DRUJ stability is relatively inconsequential. could be risk factors for nonunion. For patients without
However, after TFCC injury, ulnar head resection, or instability of the DRUJ, therefore, it may be advanta-

JHS Vol A, July


1506 DISTAL INTEROSSEOUS MEMBRANE

FIGURE 7: A A thick DIOM (arrow) in a case with DRUJ arthrosis. B After the Sauv-Kapandji procedure, it is likely that the
DIOM has an important role in stabilizing the ulnar stump. R, radius; U, ulna.

FIGURE 8: In Galeazzi fracture dislocation, the fracture line passes proximal to the insertion of the DOB along the radius.
Instability can be managed only by anatomical reduction of the radius fracture by plate fixation, because tension of the DOB can
Current Concepts

be regained by the reduction.

geous to perform a distal osteotomy or to release the sulting from the tension applied by the extensor carpi
DIOM for better healing of the ulna. ulnaris tendon sheath and TFCC, the only surviving
The DIOM is also of great importance in the man- stabilizer of the DRUJ is the DIOM. The intact DIOM
agement of concomitant ulnar-side injuries in distal may provide enough stability in most distal radius frac-
radius fracture. Orbay9 showed that in the stage of the tures to allow stable forearm rotation. Orbay described
concomitant avulsion fracture of the ulnar styloid re- a fiber within the DIOM called the distal interosseous

JHS Vol A, July


DISTAL INTEROSSEOUS MEMBRANE 1507

ligament that behaves in an isometric manner during tomical variation, it is necessary to address the persist-
forearm rotation. This fiber apparently coincides with ing DRUJ instability by specific means, such as TFCC
the DOB in Noda et als report.3 This fiber inserts on repair.
the radius proximal to the sigmoid notch and proximal
to the fracture line in the most distal radius fracture. It REFERENCES
also originates from the ulna at a substantially more 1. Watanabe H, Berger RA, Berglund LJ, Zobitz ME, An KN. Contri-
proximal level, precisely where the axis of forearm bution of the interosseous membrane to distal radioulnar joint con-
rotation intersects the surface of the ulna. Jupiter10 straint. J Hand Surg 2005;30A:1164 1171.
2. Kihara H, Short WH, Werner FW, Fortino MD, Palmer AK. The
noted that despite the presence of disruption of the stabilizing mechanism of the distal radioulnar joint during pronation
TFCC or the presence of a large ulnar styloid fracture and supination. J Hand Surg 1995;20A:930 936.
with its attached soft tissue constraints, stability will 3. Noda K, Goto A, Murase T, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H, Moritomo
H. Interosseous membrane of the forearm: an anatomical study of
occur because of the presence of the DOB and contact
ligament attachment locations. J Hand Surg 2009;34A:415 422.
pressure of the ulnar head into a stable sigmoid notch 4. Kitamura T, Moritomo H, Arimitsu S, Berglund LJ, Zhao KD, An
after plate fixation. Other, less common variation of KN, et al. The biomechanical effect of the distal interosseous mem-
distal radius fracture can result in rupture or loosening brane on distal radioulnar joint stability. J Hand Surg 2011;36A:
1626 1630.
of the DOB in addition to TFCC disruption. This path- 5. Gabl M, Zimmermann R, Angermann P, Sekora P, Maurer H,
ological condition may occur in either distal radius Steinlechner M, et al. The interosseous membrane and its influence
fracture in which the DIOM is thin or in Galeazzi on the distal radioulnar joint. An anatomical investigation of the
distal tract. J Hand Surg 1998;23B:179 182.
fracture dislocation in which the fracture line passes 6. Moritomo H, Noda K, Goto A, Murase T, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto
proximal to the insertion of the DOB on the radius (Fig. K. Interosseous membrane of the forearm: length change of liga-
8). In these types of distal radius fracture, all ligamen- ments during forearm rotation. J Hand Surg 2009;34A:685 691.
tous support for the DRUJ is lost, which results in 7. Nishiwaki M, Nakamura T, Nakao Y, Nagura T, Toyama Y. Ulnar
shortening effect on distal radioulnar joint stability: a biomechanical
severe DRUJ instability. In some cases with loosening study. J Hand Surg 2005;30A:719 726.
(not rupture) of the DOB, instability can be managed 8. Arimitsu S, Moritomo H, Kitamura K, Berglund LJ, Zhao KD, An
only by anatomical reduction of the radius fracture by KN, et al. The stabilizing effect of the distal interosseous membrane
on the distal radioulnar joint in ulnar shortening procedure: a bio-
plate fixation because tension of the DOB can be re- mechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg 2011;93A:20222030.
gained by the reduction. However, even after anatom- 9. Orbay JL. Ulnar head and styloid fractures. In Slutsky DJ, ed.
ical reduction of the skeletal structures, when either Principles and practice of wrist surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders,
2010:198 204.
DRUJ subluxation persists or clinical testing shows
10. Jupiter JB. Commentary: the effect of ulnar styloid fractures on
DRUJ instability because of insufficient DIOM func- patient-rated outcomes after volar locking plating of distal radius
tionality resulting from disruption of the DOB or ana- fractures. J Hand Surg 2009;34A:16031604.

Current Concepts

JHS Vol A, July

You might also like