Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enclosed is the NRHF senior design teams analysis of potential solutions report. This analysis
was created to compare three different design alternatives for the solar powered pumping system
that is to be implemented at the New River Hill Farm. The three alternatives are the use of solar
power with (1) battery, (2) reservoir, or (3) well system as backup for days when solar energy is
limited or unavailable. The report includes a decision matrix that will be considered during the
selection of the final design solution. Additionally, recommendations for further exploration of the
selected design are included.
Sincerely,
Team: NRHF
Members:
Colby Dechiara
Riley Finn
Kathryn Sledd
Suraye Solis
Advisors:
John Ignosh (Extension)
Sharyl Ogle (NRCS)
Gene Yagow (Faculty)
Introduction
New River Hill Farm (NRHF) is operated by the New River Soil and Water Conservation
District (SWCD). NRHF is in need of a new water distribution system for livestock watering and
a greenhouse because the current system utilizes water from the well that also provides for the
farmhouse, affecting flow to the farmhouse. Therefore, a new system with an alternative source of
water is needed; the client, SWCD, has requested that the system employ solar power and utilize
two ponds on site as the new sources of water. The goal of the NRHF Team is to design a solar-
powered watering system that provides the required daily demand (volume) of water for the
greenhouse and the peak flow rate for livestock watering. This report will provide an evaluation
of the potential solutions, described in Potential Solutions, being considered to meet this goal.
The design of the system will require two separate pump systems for each pond: pump
system one and pump system two. System 1 will supply water for both the cattle and the
greenhouse, while pump system 2 will supply water for livestock only. Each system will require
pumping to one reservoir or trough, that will then gravity feed the remaining troughs in that system.
Table 1 describes the requirements of each system. The Virginia Watering SystemsPressure-
Energy/Gravity Flow Worksheet was used to determine various parameters in the table. Figure 1
(a) and (b) shows pump system 1 and 2, respectively. A new reservoir is currently being
constructed for system 1 at the location of the hoop house; this reservoir is considered in all
calculations and potential solutions development. The trough labelled Trough 1 in system 2 is
being used as a reservoir to gravity feed the remaining three troughs in the system.
Table 1. Requirements of pump system 1 and 2 used in determining potential design solutions.
Pump System 1 Pump System 2
Number of troughs 8 3
Daily demand for cattle, L/s (gpd) 0.03 (750) 0.03 (750)
Daily demand for greenhouse, L/s (gpd) 0.002 (53) 0
Elevation head, m (ft) 30.2 (99.2) 35.5 (116.6)
Pressure/Total Dynamic Head (TDH), m (ft) 32 (104) 36 (118)
(a) (b)
Figure 1. Pump system 1 (a) and pump system 2 (b) at NRHF.
Potential Solutions
As previously stated, the SWCD is requesting that solar power be utilized in the design of
the new watering systems. Consequently, it remains a key component of the potential solutions,
with pumps, controller, and backup system being selected for compatibility with solar energy. Two
types of pumps are discussed in this section: centrifugal and positive displacement. Moreover,
three potential solutions are described; these solutions focus on the backup technology used on
days where there is limited to no sunlight. By rule of thumb, all backup options are expected to
provide sufficient water at the proper flowrate for three days with no sunlight. The first solution
uses batteries to store solar energy; the batteries will provide peak demand during times of
unfavorable weather conditions. The second solution considered is the use of a large reservoir,
which will provide the daily demand of water for three days without sufficient sunlight. Lastly,
the third potential solution requires the present system, connected to the farmhouse, to remain
connected to the troughs to provide water when there is limited or no sunlight.
Pumps
Pumps typically paired with solar energy utilize the DC output from solar panels directly,
and do not require an inverter. Solar pumps fall into two large categories: positive displacement
pumps (PDP) and centrifugal pumps. PDPs are used when the total dynamic head (TDH) is high,
but the required flow rate is low. On the other hand, the centrifugal pumps are used when TDH is
low and the flow rate is high. Using the pumping head and the required pumping rate found in
Table 1 of each system, the peak power requirements could be determined for centrifugal pumps
and positive displacement pumps from manufacturer standards, e.g. Morales and Busch (2010).
The peak demand of each system is sufficiently low for a PDP, and the dynamic head (pressure
head) is higher than most centrifugal pumps are capable of overcoming; therefore, a positive
displacement pump is selected for each potential solution. The pumps used in potential solutions
are detailed below.
Table 2. Description of pump used for pump system one and pump system 2 in potential solutions.
The first potential solution that uses batteries received low ratings for initial cost due to the
high cost of batteries. Furthermore, low ratings for maintenance and durability were given because
more servicing as well as regular battery replacement is required, which also increases
maintenance and operating costs. However, this solution is more adaptable as more batteries can
be added to scale up for more cattle or to allow for more dark days, resulting in high marks for that
criterion. Neutral marks were given for the customer opinion because there is not a strong
preference for either system.
The well backup potential solution received high ratings for initial cost because the only
infrastructure necessitating capital is the extension of the existing system to connect with the
reservoir in construction. Maintenance of wells is relatively low, and the life expectancy is long;
therefore, this solution was rated highly in these criteria. The adaptability of the well was rated
very high because it can provide water for long periods without sufficient sunshine; additionally,
it is highly unlikely for the well to run dry during these periods of little sunshine. However,
customer opinion received a very low rating because the client would prefer not to have the
watering system interfere with the availability of water in the farmhouse.
The reservoir backup potential solution received neutral ratings for initial cost because
construction is underway for a reservoir for pump system 1; however, pump system 2 will require
the construction of a new reservoir. Maintenance cost and durability received good ratings because
the proposed reservoir will include precautions to reduce effects of frost; therefore, it will not
require a lot of servicing. The customer opinion was also given a neutral rating because there is no
strict preference or bias towards either the battery or reservoir back up system. Relative costs may
be a consideration for the customer but that has been taken into account in other criteria.
Conclusion
The criteria and ranking demonstrate that the customer opinion, which initially limited the
potential solutions to those utilizing solar-power, plays a large role in the design of the required
water system. The solar-power with batteries scored the lowest of the three design alternatives,
with 2.9 out of 5 points. The low rating for the initial cost and maintenance affected the overall
score. The solar-power system using the current well system as a reserve received a score of 3.5.
It has high ratings for all criteria, except customer opinion. This last criterion was damaging to the
overall score because of the high weight attributed to it. The client wishes to eliminate the
dependence of the farm watering system on the source water that feeds the farmhouse; this factor
is essential to the design and resulted in the low mark seen for the customer opinion. Solar-power
using a reservoir scored the highest at 3.7 of 5 points. This potential solution had the high ratings
for maintenance, durability, and adaptability. The customer opinion was neutral, which placed the
overall score above that of the design alternative using the well system. Using the results of the
decision matrix and the analysis of the potential solutions, the solar-powered pump system using
a reservoir as a backup is recommended as the final design solution for the NRHF watering system.
As this potential solution is explored more, a site shade analysis will be beneficial to determine
the effect on panel selection. Additionally, more exploration into the best pump/controller/solar
PV combination for this solution will be investigated.
References
Acosolar. (2010). Sainty Solar 255 Watt Solar Panel, GES-6M255 Mono Silver Frame:
Specifications. Retrieved from https://www.acosolar.com/saintysolar-255w-ges-6m255-
mono-silver-frame-solar-
panel?gclid=CjwKEAiAmo_CBRC9qbGQssjqi28SJABYTgZx0YNS2JCR1gccgibS0Sa
Aq2i3z109P34OMFjD9yuTXxoC_lTw_wcB
Boxwell. (2016). Solar Irradiance Calculator. Retrieved from:
http://www.efficientenergysaving.co.uk/solar-irradiance-calculator.html
Green Saving Green. (2016). SP20P 20W Poly-Cristtaline solar module. Retrieved from
http://www.savegreenmoney.com/product-
p/SP20P.htm?gclid=CjwKEAiAmo_CBRC9qbGQssjqi28SJABYTgZxuHKG-
xjQ359EcSwwym1ggZ8aYoLv7VovRF_gh41BaBoCDN3w_wcB
Morales, T.D., Busch, J. (2010). Design of small photovoltaic(PV) solar-powered water pump
systems. NRCS Technical Note, 28. 1-71
The Solar Store. Dankoff 3040 Solar Force Piston Pump. Retrieved from
https://thesolarstore.com/dankoff-solar-force-piston-pump-body-and-water-box-only-
3516-p-1344.html?gclid=CPrvy9qr29ACFQmHswodRTkE6Q
Stored Energy Products (SEP). (2016). Topoint 190 Watt Mono Cell. Retrieved from
http://sepbatteries.com/topoint-190-watt-mono-cell?gclid=CO-
H8IDY29ACFcOEswod7j0FKw
TopointSolar. (2013). JTM 195-72M. Retrieved from
http://sepbatteries.com/media/add_info/Topoint_JTM%20190w_mono-min.pdf
AltEstore. (2016). Off Grid Calculator. Retrieved from
https://www.altestore.com/store/calculators/off_grid_calculator/
Wholesale Solar. Crown 430 AH 12VDC 5,160 Wh (2) Battery Bank. Retrieved from
http://www.wholesalesolar.com/1898705/crown/battery-banks/crown-430-ah-12vdc-5-
160-wh-2-battery-bank
Tmart. (2016). CMTD-2420 20A 12V/24V USB Output LCD Display PWM Panel Regulator
Solar Charge Controller. Retrieved from http://www.tmart.com/CMTD-2420-20A-12V-
24V-USB-Output-LCD-Display-PWM-Panel-Regulator-Solar-Charge-
Controller_p340806.html
USDA-NRCS. (2010). Oregon Technical Note No. 28-Design of Small Photovoltaic (PV) Solar-
Powered Water Pump Systems. Retrieved from: http://www.aeei.bse.vt.edu/wp-
content/uploads/2014/05/nrcs142p2_046471.pdf