You are on page 1of 4

DEFENDANT DREW HEATHCOAT

RECORD LACK OF IMMUNITY - PERPETRATION OF ILLICIT ACTS

1. The Plaintiff public corruption victims are suing Defendant Crooked U.S. District Court

Clerk Drew Heathcoat (“deputy in charge”) in his private individual capacity and official

capacity. Defendant Heathcoat’s criminal and unlawful acts on record were outside any

immunity and official capacity.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF LACK OF RECORD

2. Def. Crooked Clerk Heathcoat knew and fraudulently concealed that

a. No judgment pertaining to a non-existent “Rule 38 motion” existed;

b. No “Rule 38 motion” by Def. Forger Wilkinson could be found in the official records of

the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit and U.S. District Court, Middle District of

Florida;

c. No mandated “July 2009 judgment” in the amount of “$5,048.60” had ever existed and/or

been received by the District Clerk;

d. No lawful, legitimate, and authentic “writ of execution” was “issued” by any U.S. Court

of Clerk.

FALSIFICATIONS OF OFFICIAL RECORDS

3. Defendant Crooked Clerk Heathcoat falsified official documents and records for criminal

and unlawful purposes of, e.g., obtaining unlawful benefits, extorting fees and property from

the Plaintiff whistleblowers, coercing the pro se Plaintiffs to refrain from prosecution,

obstructing justice and the just, speedy, and inexpensive adjudication of Plaintiffs’ record

claims for relief, et al.


CAUSING OTHERS TO FALSIFY OFFICIAL RECORDS

4. Defendant Crooked Clerk Heathcoat caused others such as, e.g., Defendants Kim Arnett and

Diane Nipper to falsify records such as, e.g., a non-authentic and non-genuine “writ of

execution” and a non-existent “Rule 38 motion”.

CAUSING OTHERS TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE

5. Defendant Crooked Clerk Heathcoat caused others such as, e.g., Defendants Kim Arnett and

Diane Nipper to obstruct Plaintiffs’ filing of their pleadings and Notices of Appeal.

6. In July 2010, Crooked Heathcoat caused Arnett and Nipper to obstruct justice and

Plaintiffs’ filing of their “NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM ORDER, DOC. # 213 …” for

criminal and unlawful purposes of concealing the prima facie illegal acts in this Court and

covering up for Defendant corrupt Judges, who on the record conspired to conceal the

fabrications of, e.g., fake “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-

00001.0000” in exchange for bribes.

DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

7. On July 16, 2009, Defendant Heathcoat deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of their

fundamental Constitutionally guaranteed rights to, e.g., redress Government grievances,

have meaningful court access, have electronic filing privileges, use the honest services of the

Clerk of U.S. Courts, be free of Government corruption, concealment, cover up, oppression

under, e.g., color of authority and office, fraudulent pretenses of a non-existent “writ of

execution”, non-existent “judgment”, non-existent “Rule 38 motion”, non-existent “bill of

costs”.

2
RECKLESS DEPRIVATIONS OF EXPRESS CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES

8. On July 16, 2009, Defendant Heathcoat deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of express

Constitutional guarantees such as, e.g., the fundamental rights to due process and equal

protection of the law.

CONSPIRACY TO EXTORT

9. Defendant Corrupt Heathcoat conspired with other Officials and Defendants to extort fees

and Plaintiffs’ real property, unlawfully seize Plaintiffs’ record property under facially false

pretenses of a non-existent “writ of execution”, and a “July judgment”, which Heathcoat

knew did not exist on the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE

10. On July 16, 2009, Defendant Heathcoat obstructed, delayed, and prevented the

communication of crime information relating to the commission of felonies by Government

and judicial Officials and Defendants. Specifically, Crooked Clerk Heathcoat refused to issue

a. “A written statement that a diligent search of the designated records in Case No. 2:2007-

cv-00228 revealed no record or entry of any valid “writ of execution”;

b. “A written statement that a diligent search of the designated records in Case No. 2:2007-

cv-00228 revealed no record or entry of any valid “judgment in the amount of 5,048.60”;

c. “A written statement that a diligent search of the designated records revealed no record

or entry of any “electronic filing privileges” in the names of Plaintiff corruption

whistleblowers Dr. Jorg Busse and Jennifer Franklin Prescott.

11. On July 16, 2009, Defendant Heathcoat obstructed Plaintiffs’ filing of their “NOTICE OF

APPEAL FROM ORDER, DOC. # 213 …”, Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791, and obstructed,

3
delayed, and prevented the communication of crime information relating to the commission

of felonies and illegal acts by Government and judicial Officials and Defendants …

You might also like