Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1/26/2016
TCHL-878-99
criterion based test is designed to assess whether a student has learned the skills
and/or material that was presented in the class. CRTs allow the creation of a
This type of assessment has several advantages. In the case of training for
specific job duties, a CRT allows trainers to be assured that if a student passes the
exam the student has learned the items from the test. Its easy to see how this type
of test would be beneficial when testing drivers education students. If the examiner
completes the task, then the student has passed the criteria of that portion of the
exam.
plethora of information to the instructor and the student regarding the students
learning of the material. If a student is taking a chemistry exam there will likely be
several different lessons worth of material on the test. The teacher and the student
can determine which material a student mastered, and which material the student
of the teaching methods used in a specific lesson. By using data gained from a
group of students, and comparing their answers to specific questions the teacher
can determine if the material presented in the class effectively prepared the
teachers and students to determine the actual ability and knowledge of the student
students results to other students that have taken the same test in similar
circumstances. Norm referenced tests can also show whether a test taker performed
better or worse than the average student. This is determined by either selecting a
base set of students as the norm that all other students are then compared to, or
by simply comparing a students scores to the other students that took the test at
percentile ranking. Percentages simply show the score of the student. However,
percentile rankings are more nuanced. Percentile rankings give the value of all
students that scored the same or below the given student. Therefore, if a student
takes a norm-referenced test and scores in the 90 th percentile, this means that the
student scored the same as or better than 90% of his peers and 10% did better than
the student.
Thus, one can compare one child to his peers and determine as a whole if theyre
Therefore, they can use the scores obtained from a norm-referenced test, like the
activity that would give the student and teacher an idea of how the student is
progressing throughout the learning process. The key here is that the tests are
given while the student is still learning the material. Thus the student and teacher
can use these assessments as a sort of measuring stick to figure out how the
student is doing as he/she moves throughout the unit. At that point the student and
teacher can make individual and group changes to the learning activities to better
activity. These tests can be anything that is graded that lets the teacher know how
referenced test would give a teacher information about how the students as a whole
work on time, and other more classical grading methodologies standards based
grading only grades students on their actual learning and accomplishment of the
standards of the course. In many districts that have implemented standard based
grading, this means that there is no opportunity for extra credit, but students have
the opportunity to turn in the grades for learning objectives anytime and their final
One of the biggest benefits of this grading system is that a students grade is
an accurate representation of what the student has learned. In the grading system
that is used classically the students grade could vary based on a numerous number
of reasons. Weve all seen students who perform well on tests but dont turn in
homework. These students have actually learned quite a bit in the course, but
because of missing assignments they wont receive a grade that is reflective of their
actual knowledge gain. On the other side a different student could be very good at
playing the school game. Meaning, they always turn in their homework on time
and constantly pressure the teacher for extra credit. However, if this student
doesnt perform well on tests, the student might still receive a decent grade in the
class despite the fact that they havent learned anything in the course. In both of
these cases the students receive grades that dont actually represent their
effectively, this gives all parties involved more information about the education of
the student. Parents and students will have a better idea of how to best help their
students improve, and teachers can also adjust their guidance and teaching to
better help student through learning objectives that may be more challenging for
to learning to the student. A gifted student can spend less time on learning
objectives that they comprehend easily, and then spend more time working on
students will have a better idea of what types of questions they need to practice.
teachers. If teachers assign points to every single item that they do in class then
throughout the semester. Students who were absent will turn in assignments later,
and depending on the districts policy teachers will have to give grades for late
assignments throughout the semester. The key here is that when teachers have less
paperwork to do, teachers can spend more time developing quality teaching plans
forces the teacher to put set everyones grades so they lay on a perfect bell curve.
Thus, the student that received the highest score will receive the highest grade
possible on the test. On the low end, the student with the lowest grade receives the
lowest score on the test. Everyone in the middle receives scores so that the majority
There are several problems when using this grading scheme. The biggest one
that comes to mind is that the grade given gives absolutely no information about
the learning of the student. The grade that they receive is only an indicator of how
Because the curve is set by the teacher with no other input its usually completely
arbitrary. Therefore the curve and the grades are really quite meaningless to
students. Each grade is given by comparing students to one another. This will
are driven to succeed in the course are actually incentivized to work alone or even
to attempt to sabotage their peers. Obviously this is not what happens in the
professional world. Youre expected to work with other people constructively and
collaboration is key.
Sometimes students grades do not fall into the perfect bell curve. Some
researchers have shown that if the teacher is exceptionally good, then their classes
will actually perform far better over the course. When I taught in the KC school
Therefore, the averages on tests were always in the low 50s. If a teacher
implemented a strict curve in that class would cause a tremendous inflation to the
grades. Therefore, it would become detrimental to compare students to other
There are some advantages to grading on a curve. If students fall very closely
to the bell curve in general, then the previously mentioned disadvantages would
become less pronounced. However, this also implies that the grading system wont
Its also easy to see that the curve would be fairly beneficial within a fairly
competitive department at the same school. For example, if a nursing school uses a
utilizing a department wide curve would make selecting candidates a much simpler
process.
of losing vital information about students learning and performance far outweighs
the advantages.
time and correct answers. Students were also graded on note taking and
participation. I didnt have a problem with accepting late work, and if students were
lot more research online about how teachers implement the system. Ive found that
I really like the idea of using this method. It would give me more time to focus on
teaching and students learning, and less time on grading late assignments,
administrative tasks. This has been one of my biggest problems in the past.
Students will want to schedule time to come in and work with me on specific
questions, but Ive usually felt so far behind on paperwork that I felt torn between
both tasks.
entire purpose of education is for people to learn. Therefore, in order to make sure
education is working correctly students should be given grades that inform all
parties involved about the actual learning of the student. However, I think it can