747 views

Uploaded by Veeresh

Geotachnical Standard Comparison

- Retaining Walls and Geotechnical Design to Eurocode 7 Summary
- OSF Paper.pdf
- Tension Capacity of Pile
- Worked Examples Design of Pile Foundations
- GeoSS-BCA EC7 Briefing (19Nov2014).pdf
- Pilling Requirement to EC 2
- (GEOSS) - Guidelines on Good Practices for Pile Load Test
- Handbook Review Temporaywork Deep Excavation
- Pile Foundation Design and Construction Practice in Malaysia
- Bs -Concrete Mix Design Doe
- Pile caps guidance.pdf
- How Eurocode 7 Has Affected Geotechnical Design
- Ceb Fip Model Code 1990.pdf
- TR 26 Technical Reference for Deep Excavation
- Ceb Fip Model Code 2010 PDF
- Design of Pile Cap
- Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design - Worked examples
- Ultimate Lateral Capacity of Single Piles & Lpiles.pdf
- Tomlinson Foundation Design and Construction
- Composite Beams & Columns to Eurocode 4

You are on page 1of 11

Comparing BS 8004 and Eurocode 7 guidelines for single and group piles

By:

Lubrun Veeresh

Page | 1

Draft Report

01. 2016 UOM, Reduit

Copyright reserved

1.0 Introduction

The British Standard, BS 8004: 1986: Code of Practice for Foundations was formerly used for the design

of piles. However, this has been superseded by Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design Part 1: General Rules.

BS 8004 provides an in depth guideline from the type of piles to the determination of the ultimate

bearing capacity. Nevertheless, there are conflicts arising between the BS 8110 and BS 8004 where

pile design has to be conducted in conjunction with the code of practice for concrete.

When pile foundations are designed using Eurocodes, the specific guidelines to be followed are dependent

on the type of pile foundation being constructed. Eurocode 7 does not provide specific guidelines on the

method of pile design. Eurocode 7 has to be read in conjunction with BS EN 1993-1: 2005 Eurocode 3,

Design of Steel Structures, and Part 5: Pilling, for steel pile and BS EN 1995-1: 2004 Eurocode 5: Design

of Timber Structures for wooden piles. National Annex documents provide alternative procedures to

Eurocode 7, relevant to particular countries so as to make the design conform to the local practice.

1.1 Aim

The aim of this assignment is to differentiate between BS 8004 and Eurocode 7 for a single and a pile group.

1.2 Objectives

1. Look up significant differences between the two codes of practice for single piles and group piles.

2. Support the differences with relevant clauses.

3. Outline the practical relevance of the differences.

Page | 2

Draft Report

01. 2016 UOM, Reduit

Copyright reserved

2.0 Single piles

A single pile can be defined as a long, slender structural member used to transmit loads applied at its top to

the ground at lower levels.

The design of piles using Eurocode 7 consists of checking that the ground surrounding the piles can resist

compression, tension, and transverse actions at the ultimate limit state. Eurocode 7 proposes three design

approaches namely:

1. Material factoring approach at load side and a resistance factoring approach at resistance side.

Reliability is ensured by applying partial factors in two separate checks: for actions and to material

properties or pile resistances. The design are checked for both of two separate sets of partial factors.

2. Load and resistance factoring approach. It ensures reliability by applying factors to actions and

resistance. The design is checked for one set of partial factors.

3. Material factoring approach, at load as well as at resistance side. It applies factors to actions and

material properties at the same time. The design is checked for one set of factors.

BS 8004 adopts the permissible stress method in which the dead load and the most unfavourable

combination of imposed loads are assumed to be applied to the ground. The foundation is deemed safe

provided that the permissible stress on the soil has not been exceeded.

These are solid section or hollow section closed end piles driven or jacked into the ground

displacing the soil.

2. Small displacement piles

These are small cross sectional area piles driven or jacked in the ground.

3. Replacement piles

These are formed by the excavation of soil by boring methods and then casting concrete in the

unlined or lined hole.

Page | 3

Draft Report

01. 2016 UOM, Reduit

Copyright reserved

Eurocode 7 does not classify piles. However, section 7 provides design guidelines for all types of load

bearing piles.

In Eurocode 7, the loading subjected to a foundation are defined as actions. The actions can be either

structural with loadings from the superstructure, or geotechnical: caused by ground movements. The

loading behavior are designed to cover permanent unfavourable, permanent favourable and variable

situations as per clause 2.4.2. The design situations of piles are derived from section 2 under clause 2.2

considering the suitability of the soil strata. Partial factors on action subjected to pile foundations are

specified in Annex A: Tables A.1 of Eurocode 7.

BS 8004 requires that for single piles, the working load should be less than ultimate bearing capacity

including a factor of safety. The factor of safety should be based on the type of soil and the accuracy of the

method to obtain the ultimate bearing capacity. Conservative value for the factor of safety lies between 2

and 3.

Eurocode 7, clause 7.4.1 (2), considers 2 types of pile load tests namely: trial pile load test and working

pile load test. Trial pile are used for testing prior to completing the design while working load test are piles

installed within the actual foundation. Clause 7.5.2.1 (1)P states that the tests should allow the determination

of creeping behaviour, deformations and rebound behaviour of piles.

Eurocode 7 specifies that the design of a pile should be based on the static load tests or calculation methods

conforming to these tests. The methodology of conducting static pile load test is outlined in clause 7.5.2 of

Eurocode 7. It is a common practice to take static pile loading tests to failure or to a point where the failure

load can be extrapolated. Clause 7.6.1.1(3) of Eurocode 7 permits Rcm, the ultimate limit state resistance, to

be the load applied to the pile head which causes a settlement of 10% of the pile diameter if the failure load

cannot be found.

Page | 4

Draft Report

01. 2016 UOM, Reduit

Copyright reserved

2.4.2 Dynamic loading test

Dynamic loading tests, defined under Clause 7.5.3. of Eurocode 7, may be used to estimate resistances to

axial compression loads provided that there has been an adequate ground investigation and that the method

has been calibrated against static loading tests on the same type of pile and of similar length and cross-

section, and in comparable soil conditions.

BS 8004 recommends two types of pile tests to determine the ultimate bearing capacity which are the

constant rate of penetration, CRP, and maintained load, ML, test. For CRP, BS 8004 prescribes penetration

rates of 0.75 mm /minute for friction piles in clay soils and 1.55 mm/minute for piles end bearing in a

granular soil. For the ML test, the pile is driven at a constant rate for which the force applied at the top is

measured.

While piles are subjected to loads from the superstructure, they can also have actions from the soil due to

movement of the ground such as consolidation. This effect is known as downdrag and puts further

downward force on the pile. The negative friction force causing consolidation in sensitive clays may be

estimated as the cohesion of the remoulded clay multiplied by the surface area of the pile shaft. Hence, BS

8004 requires that end bearing pile will cause some consolidation of the surrounding soil and that the skin

friction should be estimated from the material properties.

Eurocode 7 recommendation to design piles subjected to negative skin effect is to treat the resulting axial

force as a permanent unfavourable action. This is given in clause 7.3.2 as actions due to ground

displacement for which 2 design approaches have been adopted: pile-soil interaction analysis and an upper-

bound force exerted on the pile shaft.

Single piles driven normally and completely in the ground are less prone to buckling. If the pile extends

above the ground after it has finished, then that part above the ground is to be designed as a column in

conjunction with BS 8110. The effective length of the pile depends on the lateral loading given under

clause 7.3.3.4 and degree of fixity provided by the ground. Eurocode 7 does not given particular details to

the effective length of piles. However, the same can be found in Eurocode 2 and 3 for concrete and steel

piles respectively.

Page | 5

Draft Report

01. 2016 UOM, Reduit

Copyright reserved

2.7 Raking piles

Raking piles are provided when the ground on which a structure is erected cannot resist horizontal forces.

During the design of the raking pile, it is assumed to be an axially loaded pile. However, du to horizontal

forces, the top of the raking pile does not move axially and hence causing bending in the pile. Alternatively,

BS 8004 proposes the use of vertically bored cast in place concrete pile to resist horizontal forces.

Eurocode 7 does not specify any criteria or guideline for raking piles.

The ultimate resistance of the pile obtained from pile load test is divided by a factor of safety to obtain the

design working load pile. From the pile test, piles up to 600 mm have a settlement less than 10 mm for a

factor of safety of 2.5 and above. As the pile diameter increases above 600mm, settlement increases. This

requires a separate analysis for the shaft friction and the base load.

Eurocode 7 under clause 7.6.4.1 states that where piles are bearing on medium-dense to dense soils the

safety requirements for ultimate limit state design are normally sufficient to prevent a serviceability limit

state in the supported structure.

A single pile foundation subjected to tension, Eurocode 7 requires that the design tensile action Ftd acting

on the pile to be less than or equal to the design tensile resistance Rtd of the pile foundation.

Ftd Rtd

Eurocode 7 allows the ultimate tensile resistance to be found by pile loading tests and more than one test

should be carried out and in the case of a large number of pile at least 2% should be tested.

Clause 7.3.3.7 of BS 8004 requires that tension pile should be designed to transmit full range of possible

loading to surrounding ground. Pulling tests are recommended in cases where the capacity of the tension

piles are unknown. The axis of the pile should be co-linear with the direction of the loading.

Page | 6

Draft Report

01. 2016 UOM, Reduit

Copyright reserved

3.0 Piles in groups

BS 8004 recommendations for pile groups are given in clause 7.3.4. Eurocode 7 does not have any specific

section dedicated to the design of pile groups. However, particular criteria for design are listed in sub

sections of clause 7.6.

3.1 Installation

As per clause 7.3.4.1 under BS 8004 section 7, pile groups installation should avoid heaving and lateral

displacement. For stiff soils, it is proposed to start driving piles at center of the group first and then moving

outwards.

Eurocode 7 does not provide any specific requirement for the installation of pile groups. However, emphasis

is laid upon the way piles are installed and monitored under clause 7.9. EN 1997-1 requires that a detailed

plan for the pile installation be prepared prior to pilling works. The integrity of the piles has to be checked

when required using sonic and vibration tests and coring methods.

The spacing of piles prescribed by BS 8004:1986 in clause 7.3.4.2 is mainly governed by the method of

installation and the bearing capacity of the pile group. The convention generally adopted are as follows.

Center to center distance > perimeter of pile

Friction pile

For circular spacing = 3 diameter

End bearing Spacing > width of piles

However, Eurocode 7 does not give any guideline pertaining to the spacing of piles in a group.

The behaviour of group piles can differ from single pile and it has to be accounted in the design. This

behavior is mainly dependent upon the load transfer mechanism through the pile to the soil. Due to variation

in soil characteristics, the ultimate bearing capacity and settlement of the pile group differs from that of a

similar number of the single pile. Hence BS 8004, clause 7.3.4.3, states that these settlements should be

within acceptable limits for the whole foundation. The size of the group affects the depth of soil stressed.

Page | 7

Draft Report

01. 2016 UOM, Reduit

Copyright reserved

This is because as the size of the pile increases from a single pile in soil to a pile group, the bulb of pressure

also increases.

For end bearing piles, the settlement can be calculated using the assumption that the load is applied

throughout the area the covered by the pile group at the level of the pile toes. For friction pile, the settlement

is found using the assumption that the load is applied on the area larger than the area covered by the pile

group at the level of the pile toes. A superposition approach is suggested for the cohesive soil from which

an estimation of the settlement of the group is found.

The Eurocode 7 recommendation for settlement of pile group is given under clause 7.6.4.2(2) P which states

that the assessment of settlement pile group should consider the settlement of individual piles together with

the group. However, it does not distinguish whether the settlement analysis assumes that the group is acting

as an equivalent large diameter pile or as a block foundation which has been used under clause 7.6.2.1 for

the calculation of compressive load.

BS 8004 defines the ultimate bearing capacity of a pile as The load at which the resistance of the soil

becomes fully mobilized. BS 8004 states that for end bearing piles on rocks, the ultimate bearing capacity

is equal to the nQ where n is the number piles in the group and Q is the ultimate bearing capacity of a single

pile. For compacted cohesionless soil, the ultimate bearing capacity of the group can be more than nQ. The

ultimate bearing capacity of friction piles in cohesive soils, is predicted to be less than nQ. Hence the

ultimate bearing capacity is dependent upon:

2. Charactheristics of the soil

3. Number of piles

4. Stiffness of the pile

The pile cap involvement in transmitting the load to the ground also affects the ultimate bearing capacity.

If the cap is not in contact with the ground, it is assumed not to be taking any load. For pile caps cast on the

cohesive soil, it may contribute to the bearing capacity of the pile group. The further distribution of the load

on the pile is dependent upon the rigidity of the pile cap.

Page | 8

Draft Report

01. 2016 UOM, Reduit

Copyright reserved

Clause 7.6.2.1 of Eurocode 7 requires the compressive resistance of a pile group should include the analysis

of both the risk of failure of an individual pile in the group and the failure of the group considered as an

equivalent block foundation. In this case the pile group acting as a block may be assumed as a single large

diameter pile as stated in the sub clause 4.

Two failure mechanisms for tension pile are stated in Eurocode 7 which are pulling the piles out of the

ground and uplifting a block of the ground with the piles. Eurocode 7 requires that there is adequate safety

against failure for a group of piles uplifting a block of ground satisfying the following equation:

Where,

Ftd is the design tensile force acting on the group of piles;

Wd is the design weight of the soil block (including the water) and the piles;

Fd is the design shear resistance at the boundary of the block of soil;

U1d is the design downward force due to the water pressure on the top of the pile foundation;

U2d is the design upward force due to the water pressure on the base of the soil block.

BS 8004 does not define any failure mechanism for pile groups in tension as Eurocode 7. However,

empirical methods has shown that the uplift resistance for a block of soil enclosed by a pile group may be

given by:

Qu = (2LH_2BH )cu + W

Where,

Qu is the total uplift resistance of the pile group

L is the overall length of the group

B is the overall width of the group

H is the depth of the block of soil below pile cap level

cu is the value of average undisturbed undrained shear strength of the soil surrounding the group

W is the value of average undisturbed undrained shear strength of the soil

Page | 9

Draft Report

01. 2016 UOM, Reduit

Copyright reserved

4.0 Conclusion

BS 8004 is based on permissible stress method while BS 8110 requires limit state design. Hence, the type

loading applied to the pile from the superstructure has to be specified. Using the design methods prescribed

by Eurocode 7 has the benefit of removing the conflict that exist between BS 8004 and BS 8110. However,

Eurocode 7 solely does not provide detailed guidelines on the behaviour of piles and has to be read in

conjunction with other Eurocodes as required.

Page | 10

Draft Report

01. 2016 UOM, Reduit

Copyright reserved

References

Andrew, B. & Andrew, H., 2008, Decoding Eurocode 7. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

Bauduin C. Besix, 2001, Design of Axially Loaded Compression Piles According to Eurocode 7. [Online].

University of Brussels, Belgium. Available at:

http://www.besix.com/Besix/media/Besix_Media/pdf/Publications/Design_of_axially_loaded_compressio

n.pdf [Accessed on: 24 January 2016]

British Standards Institution, 1986. BS 8004:1986 Code of Practice for Foundations. London: BSI.

Rules. Brussels: CEN.

Tomlinson, M. & Woodward, J., 2008, Pile Design and Construction Practice, 5th Edition. New York:

Taylor & Francis Group.

Page | 11

Draft Report

01. 2016 UOM, Reduit

Copyright reserved

- Retaining Walls and Geotechnical Design to Eurocode 7 SummaryUploaded byGirish Sreeneebus
- OSF Paper.pdfUploaded byPhakorn Kiong
- Tension Capacity of PileUploaded bynimal179
- Worked Examples Design of Pile FoundationsUploaded byThomas Bryan
- GeoSS-BCA EC7 Briefing (19Nov2014).pdfUploaded byjohnkoh99
- Pilling Requirement to EC 2Uploaded byraymond sabado
- (GEOSS) - Guidelines on Good Practices for Pile Load TestUploaded byPeter Kyaw
- Handbook Review Temporaywork Deep ExcavationUploaded byKen Liew
- Pile Foundation Design and Construction Practice in MalaysiaUploaded byHanizan Abu Bakar
- Bs -Concrete Mix Design DoeUploaded byPranav Tarlekar
- Pile caps guidance.pdfUploaded byDeepak Jain
- How Eurocode 7 Has Affected Geotechnical DesignUploaded bysouzanamel
- Ceb Fip Model Code 1990.pdfUploaded byCris Mina Vagante
- TR 26 Technical Reference for Deep ExcavationUploaded byPeyman Mzn
- Ceb Fip Model Code 2010 PDFUploaded byThaiAnhBo
- Design of Pile CapUploaded byVasilescu Cristian
- Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design - Worked examplesUploaded byPanagiotis Xanthos
- Ultimate Lateral Capacity of Single Piles & Lpiles.pdfUploaded byNicole Carrillo
- Tomlinson Foundation Design and ConstructionUploaded byfrankjams
- Composite Beams & Columns to Eurocode 4Uploaded bydfdfdfasd324sad
- Building Code of Vietnam Vol 1Uploaded byundertaker55
- 2 Piles Cap Design bs8110Uploaded byFaizal Imran
- The Design of Temporary Excavation Support to EC7Uploaded byMichael Batley
- Pile Design - Great StuffUploaded byMaryanne Tana
- Plate Load test-Site ProcedureUploaded bygeomines
- Designing of Piles Subjected to Negative Skin Friction SlidesUploaded byJudy Kamalodeen
- Pile Foundations in Engineering PracticeUploaded byIgor Gjorgjiev

- Are There Gender Differences in the Ways Males and Females Use Mobiles Phones.Uploaded byVeeresh
- Open book examples_ 1, 2, 3(a).pdfUploaded byVeeresh
- EPZUploaded byVeeresh
- ch8Uploaded byAyman Sobhy
- Impact of LandslidesUploaded byVeeresh
- Concrete TutorialsUploaded byVeeresh
- Urban Planning TheoriesUploaded byVeeresh
- Steel Member DefinitionUploaded byVeeresh

- Master AlloysUploaded byAsif Ali
- The design of hybrid fabricated girders Part 1.pdfUploaded byLingka
- Airblast Blastroom 05.03.2018Uploaded byMehman Nasibov
- Miura Boilers Steam GeneratorsUploaded byDhonyAhmedPradjoego
- Concrete Repairs Performance in Service and Current PracticeUploaded byMai Kawayapanik
- Equivalent Frame MethodUploaded byMarlo Aristorenas
- Useful Piping & Structural DataUploaded byn_ashok689039
- Melting LBMUploaded byHariVathsala
- MP206-ex1Uploaded byAnush Swaminathan
- Approach Road to KachapurUploaded byMallikarjun.D.K.
- PergolaUploaded bySudhakar Krishnamurthy
- Design Guide for Cold-Formed Steel TrussesUploaded byeng_ali_khalaf
- NBC PD1096 Rule VIII annotatedUploaded byraegab
- 2739 Cable TrayUploaded byอะไรๆก็เรา ทั้งเพ
- NZS 1664-1-1997 Aluminium Structures Limit State DesignUploaded bywey5316
- 1Uploaded byMd Sharique
- Pressure Relief Valve SizingUploaded bychenguofu
- Surface Preparation Standards JotunUploaded bybacabacabaca
- 01 Performance SpecificationsUploaded byKhalil Alhatab
- Syed Ali Rizwan Structure Book.pdfUploaded byMonika Dhakla
- chapter 2Uploaded bysurjit
- PSX J-Series Tank Jet Sparger 1209Uploaded byMayris Siza
- Indalco TablesUploaded byAdhish Gupta
- All Unitized Reinfoced FemaleUploaded bywaweng22
- Advanced Piping Stress Analysis Support DesignUploaded bygpskumar22
- Mechanism of Shear TransferUploaded bySana'a Aamir
- Catalog-Spiral Wound GasketsUploaded bysmab2162094
- Opy of 4 Detailed Estimate21Uploaded byVijay Yadav
- Steel Bridge Group.pdfUploaded byAlejandro Guardia Carrasco
- WC Timber Pocket Guide AWv2Uploaded byPete