INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMIT

Name of Employee:__________________________________
Position:MASTER TEACHER I (HS)
Review:____________________________________
Bureau/Center/Service:_________________________________
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

MFQO's KEY RESULT AREAS Objectives Time Frame Weight per KRA
OUTSTANDING
(5)

PROFESSIONAL 1. Attended Trainings, Attended at least 5

GROWTH & Seminars or Workshops trainings, seminars
DEVELOPMENT (School, Division, Regional Year Round and related activities
-30% or National) 10% and submitted all the
required outputs within
the school year.

2. Served as trainer/ facilitator/ Trained, facilitated,

chairman in school - based INSET
Semestral Chaired in committee
5% in at least 2 INSETs
with accomplishment
report within the rating
period.

3. Served as demonstration 2 lessons demonstration

June 2016-
served with complete
teacher in the school/ district/ March 2017
division level 5% documentation within
the school year

4. Conducted action
research related to school or
classroom concerns during the year.
Year Round Conducted at least one action
research and utilized division
wide supported by the following
5% evidences:
Research proposal (in complete format)
Research Report
Proposed interventions and programs
Proposed M & E for results outcome
 5.Participated in the preparation and
enrichment of curriculum; led in the
discussion of professional ideas, prob-
lems, issues and concern.
100- 93% active participation
in the preparation and enrichment
June 2016-
5% of curriculum; led in the dis-
March 2017
cussion of professional ideas,
problems, issues and concern.

INSTRUCTIONAL 1. Prepared daily lesson plans/DLLs 100- 93% well prepared

June 2016-
COMPETENCE submitted, and imple-
and visual aids related to the lessons. March 2017
-30% 3% mented lesson plans /
DLLs within the school year

2. Conducted remedial/enrichment/reinforcement episodes Planned,implemented and monitored at le

June 2016-March
for slow learners remedial classes with
2017
complete intervention mate-
5% rials, accomplishment report
and progress chart of students
within the school year

3. Introduced innovative teaching Introduced at least 3 innovative

June 2016-March
approaches and strategies and led in teaching approaches and strate-
2017 3%
the preparation of instructional materials gies and led in the preparation of
instructional materials within
the school year.

4. Carried regular teaching load for 100% required teaching load

June 2016-March
the grade / subject area 2017 2% handled every year.

5. Undertaken activities to improve performance

Increased/decreased specified
indicators through
June 2016-March
access, quality and efficiency: indicators to at least more than
2017
5% 2% over the previous year.
a.1 MPS in Periodical Tests/ NAT
a.2 Drop-out rate
a.3 Repetition rate
 a.4 Promotion rate
6. Evaluated teacher - made tests, Submitted validated reports on
June 2016-March
monitored and interpreted the the evaluation monitoring
2017
result. 2% and interpretation of results of
the teacher made test with at
least 3 activities before the
due date.
7. Checked lesson plans/DLLs 100 - 93% checked actual no. of
June 2016-March
of teachers in the assigned grade/ teachers' LPs/DLLs and prepared
2017
subject area. 5% at least 5 lesson exemplars in
grade grade/ subject area within
the school year.
8. Reported on time in the workplace and
workstation
a. Attendance No recorded absences or incurred at
least 1-3 absences within the school
June 2016- year
5%
b. Punctuality March 2017
No recorded tardiness/undertime or
incurred 1-9 times of
tardiness/undertime within the school
year

INSTRUCTIONAL
SUPERVISION 1. Assisted department head/school head in inJune 2016-March 2017 100 - 91% of the teachers
-25% tional monitoring classes 5% assigned were monitored
with monitoring reports
within the rating period.
2. Conducted mentoring/coaching program to
teachers in the department/school
Observed 100%-93% of the teachers
June 2016- under your supervision and conducted
5%
March 2017 at least 4 mentoring/coaching
programs within the school year
 3. Designed and validated training programs
for teachers
4. Assisted in rating the performance of
teachers following the RPMS Cycle
5. Assisted school selection committees in
evaluation of credentials when
hiring/promoting teachers
COMMUNITY 1. Participated/Involved in
INVOLVEMENT (10%) programs/projects/activities in the
school/community sponsored or funded by
external stakeholders
2. Assisted in updating parents on children's
progress and problems through dialogues,
conferences and PTA meetings
Served at least 2 times as chairman in
designing and validating training
Year Round 5%
programs for teachers in the
department/school
Assisted in evaluating and rating the
performance following the RPMS cycle
Semestral 5%
of 100%-93% of teachers in the
department within the rating period
Assisted the selection committee at
June 2016- least 3 times in evaluation of
5%
March 2017 credentials when hiring/promoting
teachers within the school year
Participated/Involved to at least 4
programs/projects/activities in the
school/community sponsored or
funded by external stakeholders
Year Round 5% properly documented within the
school year
Assisted to at least 6 conducted PTA
meetings/conferences/home
visitations/invitation to parents to
update parents' on thier children's
Quarterly 5%
progress and problems
 Plus Factors (5%) At least 3 performance indicators were
Rendered services over and beyond met
duties and responsibilities
1. Conducted at least one action research,
the findings/results of which can be utilized in
the improvement of instruction in the subject
area/school

2. Designed/organized/implemented program
in the district/division/regional level

3. Designed evaluation and monitoring Year Round

program in the district/division/regional level

4. Published at least one article in

professional magazines and periodicals of
division/regional/ national circulation related
to the area

5. Served as Resource speaker/consultant in

the district/division/region

Others: Pls. Specify:

4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

Overall rating/assessment for the accomplishments shall fall withinthe following

adjectival ratings and shall be in three(3) decimal points.
Ratee
 5

Instructional Competence

Prepared daily lesson plans and visual aids related

to the lesson
4

2
 1

Conducts remedial episodes classes fro slow

learners.

Instructional Competence

Updates Parents on Children's progress and

problems through dialogues, conferences and PTA 1
Meetings

1
 1

Enriched the curriculum of his/her field of

1
specialization

Instructional Competence
5

5
Initiated improvements in instructional program
 4
Evaluated teacher-made tests, monitor and
interpet the result

Instructional 1
Competence

Constructed the needed Instructional Materials

available to teachers and pupils
3

4
Assisted in designing capacity development
programs for teachers
 Assisted in designing capacity development
programs for teachers

1
23. Serves as trainer
in school-based
INSET

3
 3

1
25. Checked regularly
Instructional Supervision
lesson plans for

5
teachers in the

4
assgined grade/

3
subject area

2
 1
Instructional
Supervision
5

6. Carried regular teaching load for assigned 3

grade

1. Assisted the guidance counselor in handling 3

students with problems.

1
Instructional
Supervision
5
 4

3
Conducted echo-seminars for co-teachers

2. Mentored co-teachers in content and skills

difficulties.
3

Instructional
Supervision

5
 4

3. Helped in the proper and accurate

dissemination implementation of school
policies. 3

1. Assisted the principal in instructional 3

monitoring of teachers

Instructional
Supervision
5

2. Guided co-teachers in the performance of

2. Guided co-teachers in the performance of
3
duties and responsibilities

3. Assisted the school head in class

monitoring
MANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
IN DURING PLANNING
VERY
SATISFACTORY
(4)
Attended at least 4
trainings, seminars
and related activities
and submitted all the
required outputs within
the school year.
Trained, facilitated,
Chaired in committee
in at least 1 INSET
with accomplishment
report within the rating
period.
1 lesson demonstration
served with complete
documentation and with very
satisfactory remarks within
the school year
Conducted at least one action
research and utilized division
wide supported by the following
evidences:
Research proposal (in complete forma Research proposal (in complete format)
Research Report
Proposed interventions and programs
Name of Rater:_____________________________________________________
Position: _____________________________________________________________
Date of Review:________________________________________________
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR
(3) (2) (1)
Attended at least 3 Attended at least 1 No attendance in any
trainings, seminars trainings, seminars trainings, seminars
and related activities and related activities and related activities
and submitted all the and submitted all the within the school year'
required outputs within required outputs within
the school year. the school year.
Served as member of Served as member of Served as member of
a committee in at least a committee in at least a committee in at least
2 INSETs with accom- 2 INSETs but failed to submit accom- 1 INSET but failed to submit accom-
plishment report within plishment report within plishment report within
the rating period. the rating period. the rating period.
1 lesson demonstration 1 lesson demonstration No demonstration
served with satisfactory served with unsatisfactory teaching done
remarks within the school remarks within the school year within the
year school year
Conducted at least one action Action Research conducted but not No Action Research conducted
research and utilized school/ district utilized
wide supported by the following
evidences:
Research Report
Proposed interventions and programs
Proposed M & E for results outcome
92 - 85% active participation
in the preparation and enrichment
of curriculum; led in the dis-
cussion of professional ideas,
problems, issues and concern.
92- 85% well prepared
submitted, and imple-
mented lesson plans /
DLLs within the school year
Planned, implemented and monitored at Planned,
remedial classes with
complete intervention mate-
rials, accomplishment report
and progress chart of students
within the school year
Introduced at least 2 innovative
teaching approaches and strate-
gies and led in the preparation of
instructional materials within
the school year.
At least 90% required
teaching load handled
every year.
Increased/decreased specified
indicators to at least
1% over the previous year.
84 - 75% active participation
in the preparation and enrichment
of curriculum; led in the dis-
cussion of professional ideas,
problems, issues and concern.
84 - 75% well prepared
submitted, and imple-
mented lesson plans /
DLLs within the school year
l implemented and monitored at lePlanned and implemented at least 1
remedial class with
complete intervention mate-
rials, accomplishment report
and progress chart of students
within the school year
Introduced at least 1 innovative
teaching approaches and strate-
gies and led in the preparation of
instructional materials within
the school year.
At least 80% required teaching
load handled every year.
Maintained rate on specified
indicaticators over previous
year.
74 - 51% active participation
in the preparation and enrichment
of curriculum; led in the dis-
cussion of professional ideas,
problems, issues and concern.
74 - 51%prepared
submitted, and imple-
mented lesson plans /
DLLs within the school year
remedial classes with
incomplete intervention mate-
rials, accomplishment report
and progress chart of students
within the school year
Introduced at least 1 innovative
teaching approaches and strate-
gies but failed to prepare
instructional materials within
the school year.
At least 70% required
teaching load handled every
year
Increased/decreased specified
indicators to at least
1% over the previous year.
50% and below active participation
in the preparation and enrichment
of curriculum; led in the dis-
cussion of professional ideas,
problems, issues and concern.
50% & below prepared
submitted, and imple-
mented lesson plans /
DLLs within the school year
No remedial classes were
implemented for slow
learners within the
the school year
No innovative teaching was intro-
duced within the school year.
69% and below required
teaching load handled
every year.
Increased/decreased specified
indicators to at least
2% over the previous year.
Submitted validated reports on
the evaluation monitoring
and interpretation of results of
the teacher made test with at
least 2 activities before the
due date.
92 - 85% checked actual no. of
teachers' LPs/DLLs and prepared
at least 4 lesson exemplars in
grade grade/ subject area within
the school year.
Incurred at least 4-8 absences
within the school year
Incurred at least 10-14
tardiness/undertime within the
school year
90- 76% of the teachers
assigned were monitored
with monitoring reports
within the rating period.
Observed 85%-92% of the teachers
under your supervision and
conducted at least 3
mentoring/coaching programs
within the school year
Submitted validated reports on
the evaluation monitoring
and interpretation of results of
the teacher made test with at
least 1 activity within the
due date.
84 - 75% checked actual no. of
teachers' LPs/DLLs and prepared
at least 3 lesson exemplars in
grade grade/ subject area within
the school year.
Incurred at least 9-11 absences within Incurred at least12-14 absences within
the school year
Incurred at least 15-19
tardiness/undertime within the school
year
75 - 50% of the teachers
assigned were monitored
with monitoring reports
within the rating period.
Observed 75%-84% of the teachers
under your supervision and
conducted at least 2
mentoring/coaching programs within
the school year
Submitted validated reports on
the evaluation monitoring
and interpretation of results of
the teacher made test with at
least 1 activity beyond the
due date.
74 - 51% checked actual no. of
teachers' LPs/DLLs and prepared
at least 2 lesson exemplars in
grade grade/ subject area within
the school year.
the school year
Incurred at least 20-24
tardiness/undertime within the school
year
49- 31% of the teachers
assigned were monitored
with monitoring reports
within the rating period.
Observed 51%-74% of the teachers
under your supervision and conducted at teachers under your supervision and
least 1 mentoring/coaching program
within the school year
Submitted validated reports on
the evaluation monitoring
and interpretation of results of
the teacher made test with
no activity beyond the
due date.
50% and below checked actual no. of
teachers' LPs/DLLs and prepared
at least lesson exemplar in
grade grade/ subject area within
the school year.
Incurred at least 15 absences and
above within the school year
Incurred at least 25 and above
tardiness/undertime within the school
year
30% and below of the
teachers assigned were
monitored with monitoring
reports within the rating period.
Observed 50% and below of the
failed to conduct mentoring/coaching
programs within the school year
Served at least once as chairman in Served at least 2 times as member in Served at least once as member in
Have not involved in designing and
designing and validating training designing and validating training designing and validating training
validating training programs for
programs for teachers in the programs for teachers in the programs for teachers in the
teachers in the department/school
department/school department/school department/school

Assisted in evaluating and rating Assisted in evaluating and rating the Assisted in evaluating and rating the Assisted in evaluating and rating the
the performance following the RPMS performance following the RPMS performance following the RPMS cycle of performance following the RPMS cycle
cycle of 92%-85% of teachers in the cycle of 84%-75% of teachers in the 74%-51% of teachers in the department of 50% and below of teachers in the
department within the rating period department within the rating period within the rating period department within the rating period

Have not assisted the selection

Assisted the selection committee at
least 2 times in evaluation of
credentials when hiring/promoting
teachers within the school year
Participated/Involved to at least 3
programs/projects/activities in the
school/community sponsored or
funded by external stakeholders
properly documented within the
school year
Assisted the selection committee at
least once in evaluation of credentials
when hiring/promoting teachers
within the school year
Participated/Involved to at least 2
programs/projects/activities in the
school/community sponsored or
funded by external stakeholders
properly documented within the
school year
Assisted the selection committee at least
once in evaluation of credentials when
hiring/promoting teachers but failed to
submit evidences within the school year
Participated/Involved to at least 1
program/project/activity in the
school/community sponsored or funded
by external stakeholders properly
documented within the school year
committee even once in the
evaluation of credentials when
hiring/promoting teachers within the
school year
Have not participated/involved to any
program/project/activity in the
school/community sponsored or
funded by external stakeholders
within the school year

Assisted to at least 5 conducted PTA
meetings/conferences/home
visitations/invitation to parents to
update parents' on thier children's
progress and problems
Assisted to at least 4 conducted PTA
meetings/conferences/home
visitations/invitation to parents to
update parents' on thier children's
progress and problems
Assisted to at least 2-3 conducted PTA
meetings/conferences/home
visitations/invitation to parents to
update parents' on thier children's
progress and problems
Assisted to at least 1 conducted PTA
meetings/conferences/home
visitations/invitation to parents to
update parents' on thier children's
progress and problems
At least 2 performance indicators At least 1 performance indicator was At least 1 performance indicator was No performance indicator was met
were met met met but no evidence

Overall Rating of Accomplishments

Rater Approving Authority
Evaluated, checked, improved and
prepared lesson plans in grade level
that: All indicators were met within the
100 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
targeted timeframe
- Provides adequacy and functionality in
the instruction.
Evaluated, checked and prepared
sample lesson plans for in grade level
that: All indicators were met within the
87 - 89% Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4
targeted timeframe
- Provided adequacy and functionality in
the instruction.
Evaluated prepared lesson plans in
grade level that: All indicators were met within the
75 - 86% Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3,
- Provides adequacy and functionality in targeted timeframe
the instruction.
Evaluated, checked, improved prepared
sample lesson plans for in grade level
that: All indicators were met within the
63 - 74% Accomplished indicators 1, 2
targeted timeframe
- Provides adequacy and functionality in
the instruction.
Evaluated, checked, improved prepared
sample lesson plans for in grade level
that: Indicators were met beyond the targeted
51 - 62% Accomplished indicator 1
time-frame
- Provides adequacy and functionality in
the instruction.
All indicators were
Implemented remedial classes to met before the
100 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
address learning needs of students. targeted time
frame
All indicators were
met within the
Launched remedial classes 87 - 89% Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4
targeted time
frame
All indicators were
Submitted plan in remediation program met within the
75 - 86% Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3,
to immdiate superior targeted time
frame
All indicators were
Developed strategic plan in conducting met within the
63 - 74% Accomplished indicators 1, 2
remediation targeted time
frame

Proposed strategic remediation progran
Maintained/sustained communication met before the
with parents
Followed up learners' progress
Conducted dialog/conferences on
children's progress
Prepared letter to parents
Sought permission from the Principal
Conduct Conference/PTA Meeting
National level enrichment of the
curriculum of his/her field of
specialization.
Regional level enrichment of the
curriculum of his/her field of
specialization.
Division level enrichment of the
curriculum of his/her field of
specialization.
School level enrichment of the
curriculum of his/her field of
specialization.
Locally enriches the curriculum of
his/her field of specialization
Four or more
indicators were met
51% - 62% Accomplished indicator 1
beyond the targeted
time-frame
All indicators were
100 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
targeted time
frame
All indicators were
met within the
87 - 89% Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4
targeted time
frame
All indicators were
met within the
75 - 86% Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3,
targeted time
frame
All indicators were
met within the
63 - 74% Accomplished indicators 1, 2
targeted time
frame
Four or more
to indicators were met
51 - 62% Accomplished indicator 1
beyond the targeted
time-frame
All indicators were
met within the 100 % - Addresses learning gaps/difficulties
targeted timeframe
All indicators were
met within the 90% - Addresses learning gaps/difficulties
targeted timeframe
All indicators were
met within the 85% - Addresses learning gaps/difficulties
targeted timeframe
All indicators were
met within the 70% - Addresses learning gaps/difficulties
targeted timeframe
Indicators were met
Below 70% - Addresses learning
beyond the targeted
gaps/difficulties
 Locally enriches the curriculum of
his/her field of specialization
Implemented the approved instructional
programs
Initiated the pilot implementation of the
approved instructional program.
Presented the approved instructional
programs to teachers.
Sought for the approval of the
instructional program from the
immediate superior.
Designed the intructional program
Submitted validated reports on the
evaluation monitoring and
interpretation of results of the Teacher
made test
LAC session on test preparation
Monitored the test results every
Periodical Test
Developed a Teacher made test
Informed teachers regarding the
schools teacher made test and
consolidated test results
Presented the instructional materials met within the
made by the teachers to the Immediate
Superior
Below 70% - Addresses learning
gaps/difficulties
time-frame
All activities covered in indicators 1,2,3,4,
5 were implemented before the targeted 100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
time-frame.
At least one activity covered in indicators
1,2,3,4, 5 were not implemented within 87 - 89% Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4
the targeted time-frame.
At least two activities covered in
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
75 -86% Accomplished indicators 1,2,3
implemented within the targeted time-
frame.
At least three activities covered in
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
63 - 74% Accomplished indicators 1, 2
implemented within the targeted time-
frame.
Four or more of the activities covered in
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were implemented 51 - 62% Accomplished indicator 1
beyond the targeted time-frame.
All activities covered in indicators
1,2,3,4,5 were implemented before the 100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
targeted time-frame.
At least one activity covered in indicators
1,2,3,4, 5 were not implemented within 87 - 99% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4
the targeted time-frame.
At least two activities covered in
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
75 - 86 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3,
implemented within the targeted time-
frame.
At least three activities covered in
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
63 - 74 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2
implemented within the targeted time-
frame.
Four or more activities covered in
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were implemented 51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
beyond the targeted time-frame.
All indicators were
100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
targeted time
frame

Checked and validated the instructional met within the
materials made by the Teachers.
Followed up the designed instructional met within the
materials
Oriented the Teachers for needs of
instructional materials
reproduction/improvisation
Conducted inventory on instructional
materials.
Presented the approved design of the
training program.
Indicators were
87 - 99% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4
targeted time
frame
Indicators were not
75 - 86 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3,
targeted time
frame
Indicators were not
met within the 63 - 74 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2
targeted time frame
Indicators were not
met within the 51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
targeted time frame
All activities covered in indicators 1,2,3,4,
5 were implemented before the targeted 100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
time-frame.

At least one activity covered in indicators

Sought for the approval of the training
1,2,3,4, 5 were not implemented within 87-99% - Accomplished indicators 1,2,3,4
matrix from the immediate superior.
the targeted time-frame.

At least two activities covered in

Drafted the training matrix.
Attended the planning committee
meeting.
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
75 - 86% - Accomplished indicators 1,2,3
implemented within the targeted time-
frame.
At least three activities covered in
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
63 - 74 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2
implemented within the targeted time-
frame.

Four or more of the activities covered in

Informed/notified about the training
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were implemented 51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
program
beyond the targeted time-frame.

All indicators were

implemented before the
targeted time-frame.
All
Conducted the monitoring tool on the indicators were
discipline between the teachers and 87-99% - Accomplished indicators 1,2,3,4
learners. implemented before the
targeted time-frame.

Oriented teachers on the monitoring indicators were
tool
Sought for approval from the Immediate indicators were
Superior
Secured monitoring tool
Served as trainer in School-based INSET
Prepared materials needed for the
INSET such as handouts, powerpoint
etc.
Attended in the planning session for the All indicators were met
INSET
Sought approval from the Immediate
Superior
Wrote a letter of intent
Maintained a record of checked lesson indicators were
plans within the year.
Prepared a feedback report
Checked lesson plan of Teachers
atleast four times a month
All
75 - 86% - Accomplished indicators 1,2,3
implemented within the
targeted time-frame.
All
63 - 74 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2
implemented within the
targeted time-frame.
All
indicators were
51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
implemented beyond the
targeted time-frame.
All
indicators were
100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
implemented before the
targeted time-frame.
All
indicators were
87-99% - Accomplished indicators 1,2,3,4
implemented before the
targeted time-frame.
75 - 86% Accomplished indicators 1,2,3
within the targeted time-frame.
63 - 74% Accomplished indicators 1,2
At least one
indicator
51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
was met beyond
the targeted time-frame.
All
100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
implemented before the
targeted time-frame.
All
indicators were
87-99% - Accomplished indicators 1,2,3,4
implemented before the
targeted time-frame.
All indicators were met
within the targeted time-frame.
75 - 86% Accomplished indicators 1,2,3
 Checked lesson plan of Teachers
75 - 86% Accomplished indicators 1,2,3
atleast four times a month

Prepared a checklist of Teachers 63 - 74% Accomplished indicators 1,2

Coordinated with the Head
Teacher/School Head
Carried the regular teaching load for
the assigned grade/level
At least one
indicator
51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
was met beyond
the targeted time-frame.
All activities covered in indicators 1,2,3,4,
5 were implemented before the targeted 100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
time-frame.

At least one activity covered in indicators

Signed and accepted the teaching loads 1,2,3,4, 5 were not implemented within 87 - 99% Accomplisehd indicators 1,2,3,4
the targeted time-frame.

At least two activities covered in

Assigned to handle the regular teaching indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
75 - 86% Accomplished indicators 1,2,3
load. implemented within the targeted time-
frame.
At least three activities covered in
Attended the meeting for the indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
63 - 74 % - Accomplished indicators 1,2
distribution of teaching loads implemented within the targeted time-
frame.

Four or more of the activities covered in

Informed regarding the regular teaching
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were implemented
loads.
beyond the targeted time-frame.
51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
All activities covered in indicators 1,2,3,4,
Submitted an accomplishment report 5 were implemented before the targeted 100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
time-frame.

At least one activity covered in indicators

Conducted follow up to students with
1,2,3,4, 5 were not implemented within 87 - 99% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4
problems
the targeted time-frame.

At least two activities covered in

Implemented the approved workplan
Sought the approval of the person in
authority
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
75 - 86 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3,
implemented within the targeted time-
frame.
At least three activities covered in
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
63 - 74 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2
implemented within the targeted time-
frame.
 Prepared a work plan in assisting the Four or more activities covered in
guidance counselor in handling indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were implemented 51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
students with problems in bullying beyond the targeted time-frame.

All activities covered in indicators 1,2,3,4,

Submitted an accomplishment report 5 were implemented before the targeted 100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
time-frame.

At least one activity covered in indicators

Conducted the echo seminar-workshop 1,2,3,4, 5 were not implemented within 87 - 99% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4
the targeted time-frame.

At least two activities covered in

Created technical working group,
organized planning/meeting on echo
seminar-workshop
Sought the approval of the person in
authority
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
75 - 86 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3,
implemented within the targeted time-
frame.
At least three activities covered in
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
63 - 74 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2
implemented within the targeted time-
frame.

Four or more activities covered in

Prepared a training proposal indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were implemented 51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
beyond the targeted time-frame.

All activities covered in indicators 1,2,3,4,

Submitted monitoring report and
5 were implemented before the targeted 100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
accomplishment report for LAC session
time-frame.

At least one activity covered in indicators

Observed classes and Conducted LAC
1,2,3,4, 5 were not implemented within 87 - 99% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4
sessions
the targeted time-frame.

At least two activities covered in

Sought approval from immediate indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
75 - 86 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3,
superior implemented within the targeted time-
frame.
At least three activities covered in
Created a work plan for mentoring/LAC indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
63 - 74 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2
session implemented within the targeted time-
frame.

Four or more activities covered in

Identified the teachers to be mentored indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were implemented 51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
beyond the targeted time-frame.

All activities covered in indicators 1,2,3,4,

Compiled the memorandum signed by
5 were implemented before the targeted 100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
the School Personnel
time-frame.
 At least one activity covered in indicators
Disseminated the School Policies 1,2,3,4, 5 were not implemented within 87 - 99% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4
the targeted time-frame.

At least two activities covered in

Prepared a memorandum to
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
disseminate the School Policies signed 75 - 86 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3,
implemented within the targeted time-
by the School Head
frame.
At least three activities covered in
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
Reviewed the School Policies 63 - 74 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2
implemented within the targeted time-
frame.

Four or more activities covered in

Downloaded/secured copy of School
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were implemented 51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
Policies
beyond the targeted time-frame.

Submitted and reported to the

pPrincipal the results of classroom All activities covered in indicators 1,2,3,4,
observation and suggested intervention 5 were implemented before the targeted 100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
to furher improve the teaching-learning time-frame.
process

Completely accomplished the

classroom observation tool and
conducted a post-conference session
with the observed teachers
Observed the targeted number of
teachers using the classroom
observation tool
Conducted meetings with the teachers
to be observed and oriented them on
the criteria of classroom observation
tool
At least one activity covered in indicators
1,2,3,4, 5 were not implemented within 87 - 99% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4
the targeted time-frame.
At least two activities covered in
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
75 - 86 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3,
implemented within the targeted time-
frame.
At least three activities covered in
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
63 - 74 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2
implemented within the targeted time-
frame.

Listed the names of teachers to be Four or more activities covered in

observed in the instructional indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were implemented 51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
supervisory logbook beyond the targeted time-frame.

Made oneself available for teachers'

consultation regarding the betterment All activities covered in indicators 1,2,3,4,
of his/her performance of duties and 5 were implemented before the targeted 100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
responsibilities and held records for time-frame.
such in the logbook
 Constantly reminded the teachers At least one activity covered in indicators
about the strengths and weaknesses 1,2,3,4, 5 were not implemented within 87 - 99% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4
through FGD and noted the agreements the targeted time-frame.

Conducted classroom visitation to At least two activities covered in

check the performance of teacher's indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
75 - 86 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3,
duties and responsibilities and recorded implemented within the targeted time-
the observation in the logbook frame.

Conducted an orientation with the At least three activities covered in

teachers on the duties and indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
63 - 74 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2
responsibilities and the planned implemented within the targeted time-
activities to monitor such frame.
Listed the teachers' duties and
Four or more activities covered in
responsibilities and plotted schedule on
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were implemented 51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
teachers' orientation and consultation
beyond the targeted time-frame.
session
All activities covered in indicators 1,2,3,4,
Prepared and submitted class
5 were implemented before the targeted 100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
monitoring report
time-frame.

At least one activity covered in indicators

Conducted follow-up class monitoring 1,2,3,4, 5 were not implemented within 87 - 99% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4
the targeted time-frame.

At least two activities covered in

Conducted post
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
conference/feedbacking with the School 75 - 86 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3,
implemented within the targeted time-
Head
frame.
At least three activities covered in
Conducted class monitoring with the indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
63 - 74 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2
School Head implemented within the targeted time-
frame.

Four or more activities covered in

Informed by the School Head on the
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were implemented 51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
scheduled monitoring
beyond the targeted time-frame.

Submitted the minutes of the meeting

All activities covered in indicators 1,2,3,4,
with theGgrade Chairman to discuss
5 were implemented before the targeted 100% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5
about the school
time-frame.
problems/awards/promotion

Conducted meetings with the Grade At least one activity covered in indicators
Chairman to discuss about the school 1,2,3,4, 5 were not implemented within 87 - 99% - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3, 4
problems/ awards/ promotion the targeted time-frame.
 At least two activities covered in
Scheduled meeting/s with the grade
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
chairman whenever needed concerning 75 - 86 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2, 3,
implemented within the targeted time-
school problems/ awards/ promotion
frame.
At least three activities covered in
indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were not
Sought the approval of the school head 63 - 74 % - Accomplished indicators 1, 2
implemented within the targeted time-
frame.

Got hold of the copy of Four or more activities covered in

memo/advisory/letter pertaining to indicators 1,2,3,4, 5 were implemented 51 - 62% - Accomplished indicator 1
school problems/awards/ promotion beyond the targeted time-frame.
 TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION

ACTUAL RATING SCORE

RESULTS
Approving Authority