Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T. E. Pickeringa
a MMT Observatory, 933 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85721, USA;
ABSTRACT
The MMT all-sky camera is a low-cost, wide-angle camera system that takes images of the sky every 10 seconds,
day and night. It is based on an Adirondack Video Astronomy StellaCam II video camera and utilizes an auto-iris
fish-eye lens to allow safe operation under all lighting conditions, even direct sunlight. This combined with the
anti-blooming characteristics of the StellaCams detector allows useful images to be obtained during sunny days
as well as brightly moonlit nights. Under dark skies the system can detect stars as faint as 6th magnitude as well
as very thin cirrus and low surface brightness zodiacal features such as gegenschein. The total hardware cost of
the system was less than $3500 including computer and framegrabber card, a fraction of the cost of comparable
systems utilizing traditional CCD cameras.
Keywords: Sky Monitoring, All-Sky Imaging, Observatory Site Conditions
1. INTRODUCTION
How clear is it? is a question every astronomer asks while observing. It can often be answered by simply going
outside and looking at the sky. However, the human eye takes several minutes to become fully dark-adapted so
thin cloudiness can often be missed. Another common question that can be much harder to answer is How clear
was it when my data was taken? Answering that requires some archived record of sky conditions that can be
searched or queried.
Wide-angle imaging is a popular way of monitoring the sky that can provide a real-time view of current
conditions. Images from such a system can also be analyzed quantitatively and archived for later use. One of the
best-known examples of this is the Michigan Tech CONCAM1 system. Other observatories have deployed their
own all-sky imaging systems such as CASCA at Las Campanas (http://ascam2.lco.cl/), TASCA2 at Cerro
Tololo, SNOOP at Mt. Palomar (http://snoop.palomar.caltech.edu/), and ESOs MASCOT3 at Cerro
Paranal. These systems all use CCDs to obtain visual to near-IR images. It is also possible to detect clouds
directly in the near to mid-IR using systems such as the one deployed at Apache Point.4 IR-based systems have
the advantage of detecting clouds equally well under all conditions (e.g. dark time vs. bright time). However,
they require much more complicated and expensive optics and detectors. The Apache Point system, for example,
cost in excess of $100,000.
The MMTs budget was far more limited than that and even the $20,000 that CONCAM quotes for one of
their systems was well out of reach. We were not initially interested in that level of photometric and astrometric
precision, anyway. We simply wanted something that could reliably go as deep visually as a dark-adapted human
eye under dark skies while still providing useful images under a full moon.
2. CAMERA HARDWARE
The genesis of the idea of a low-cost video-based all-sky camera came about when testing some inexpensive
low-light video cameras with wide-angle lenses. We discovered that if we fed the signal into a framegrabber card,
integrated several seconds worth of frames, and subtracted a dark frame, we could detect stars down to 2nd or 3rd
magnitude. A quick back-of-the-envelope calculation determined that a camera that did the integration internally
could easily reach 5th or 6th magnitude, the naked eye limit. StellaCam video cameras from Adirondack Video
Astronomy (AVA) perform just this kind of on-camera integration.
Author E-mail Address: tpickering@mmto.org
Figure 1. Pictures of the installed sky camera system. The image on the left shows the enclosure and junction box
mounted on a pole at the east end of the summit parking lot. The image on the right shows the entrance window of the
enclosure.
We opted for the StellaCam II system because it provides the capability of full computer automation via an
RS232 interface and can integrate for up to 256 frames (8.53 seconds). It used to be the case that high quality
ultra-wide-angle fish-eye lenses were very expensive. However, it is now possible to find several reasonably
good C/CS mount fish-eye lenses for under $200 that provide a full 180 field-of-view. We went with a Fujinon
YV2.2X1.4A-SA2 that is carried by AVA. Similar lenses are made by Pelco and others and sold by companies
that specialize in CCTV hardware. Initial testing was performed with the manual-iris version of the lens, but we
switched to the auto-iris version when it became available. The StellaCam II has an auto-iris port and testing
showed that this combination could be safely used during the day under direct sunlight and thus allow full 24/7
operation.
The lack of a need for a mechanical shutter greatly simplifies the enclosure requirements. We decided to
try an off-the-shelf outdoor security camera enclosure from Pelco, the EH2515. Its compact, inexpensive, and
fully sealed against rain and dust by tight O-ring seals. Our unit came with an optional heater/defroster unit
that turned out to be defective. Fortunately, we have found that it has not really been necessary. The heat
from the camera and its power supply are usually sufficient to keep the small enclosure warm enough to prevent
condensation. The front of the fish-eye lens is set back about 1 cm from the lip of the enclosure. This cuts down
the field-of-view slightly from a rated 185 to a measured 150 . Pointing a flat window straight up raised a few
eyebrows at first, but it has worked out very well. The seal around the window has held up to numerous rain
storms and has only needed occasional cleaning. The front of the enclosure does fill up like a bowl in heavy rain,
but this does not affect the seal. In fact, this helps move dirt off the clear part of the window by wind blowing
the water around and by the enclosures slight offset from vertical. The camera can still take clear pictures of
the sky while the front is filled with water which was a little disconcerting when first observed. Pictures of the
as-installed system can be seen in Figure 1.
x = x0 R sin()
y = y0 + R cos()
where (x0 , y0 ) is the position of zenith. We do not see any significant angular variation so the conversion from
azimuth to is straightforward:
= Az + off (1)
where off is simply a measure of the cameras rotation offset with respect to the sky. R corresponds to the
zenith angle, z = 90 Alt. To account for distortion in the lens, we use a 3rd order polynomial to model the
transformation between z and R:
R = a z + b z2 + c z3 (2)
which leaves us a total of 6 unknowns to solve for. In the systems current configuration, these parameters are:
x0 = 298.861
y0 = 228.746
off = 12.94
a = 3.203 pixels/
b = 2.46 103 pixels/2
c = 1.21 104 pixels/3
250
Reference Stars
3.203*z + 2.46e-3*z2 - 1.21e-4*z3
200
150
R (pixels)
100
50
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Zenith Angle (degrees)
Figure 2. Radius, R, from zenith point in image versus zenith angle for a set of reference stars along with the best-fit
polynomial transform.
Figure 2 shows some reference star data plotted along with the best-fit transform from z to R. These parameters
need to be recalculated whenever the camera system is moved in any way, but have proven to be very stable over
time when the system is left alone. The elevation cutoff due to the enclosure works out to be about 15 . The
RMS scatter about the best-fit coordinate transform is 1.2 pixels.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to express many thanks to Cory Knop, Ken van Horn, Phil Ritz, and the rest of the MMTO mountain
staff for their hard work installing the all-sky camera system and keeping it maintained.
REFERENCES
1. W. E. Pereira, The CONCAM global sky monitoring network: Its evolution and the creation of a performance
model, Ph.D. Thesis , 2003.
2. R. Smith, D. Walker, and H. E. Schwarz, The Tololo All Sky Camera, in Scientific Detectors for Astronomy,
The Beginning of a New Era, P. Amico, J. W. Beletic, and J. E. Belectic, eds., pp. 379384, 2004.
3. J.-G. Cuby, P. Barriga, R. Cabanac, R. Castillo, I. Gavignaud, G. Gillet, N. Haddad, M. Kiekebusch,
M. Marchesi, P. Mardones, M. Riquelme, P. Robert, and S. Rondi, Instrumentation activities at Paranal
Observatory, in Observatory Operations to Optimize Scientific Return III. Edited by Quinn, Peter J. Pro-
ceedings of the SPIE, Volume 4844, pp. 35-45 (2002)., P. J. Quinn, ed., pp. 3545, Dec. 2002.
4. K. S. J. Anderson, J. Brinkmann, M. Carr, D. Woods, D. P. Finkbeiner, J. E. Gunn, C. L. Loomis, D. Schlegel,
and S. Snedden, Apache Point Observatorys All-Sky Camera: Observing Clouds in the Thermal Infrared,
Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society 34, pp. 1130+, Dec. 2002.
5. W. Pence, CFITSIO, v2.0: A New Full-Featured Data Interface, in ASP Conf. Ser. 172: Astronomical
Data Analysis Software and Systems VIII, D. M. Mehringer, R. L. Plante, and D. A. Roberts, eds., pp. 487+,
1999.