Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Relativerisk
FromWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia
Instatisticsandepidemiology,relativeriskorriskratio(RR)istheratiooftheprobabilityofaneventoccurring
(forexample,developingadisease,beinginjured)inanexposedgrouptotheprobabilityoftheeventoccurringin
acomparison,nonexposedgroup.Relativeriskincludestwoimportantfeatures:(i)acomparisonofriskbetween
two"exposures"putsrisksincontext,and(ii)"exposure"isensuredbyhavingproperdenominatorsforeachgroup
representingtheexposure[1][2]
Consideranexamplewheretheprobabilityofdevelopinglungcanceramong
smokerswas20%andamongnonsmokers1%.Thissituationisexpressedinthe Diseasestatus
22tabletotheright. Risk
Present Absent
Here,a=20,b=80,c=1,andd=99.Thentherelativeriskofcancerassociated Smoker
withsmokingwouldbe Nonsmoker
Smokerswouldbetwentytimesaslikelyasnonsmokerstodeveloplungcancer.
Thealternativetermriskratioissometimesusedbecauseitistheratiooftheriskintheexposeddividedbythe
riskintheunexposed.
Relativeriskcontrastswiththeactualorabsoluterisk,andmaybeconfusedwithitinthemediaorelsewhere.
Contents
1 Statisticaluseandmeaning
1.1 Bayesianinterpretation
1.2 Logtransformationforapproximatinganormaldistribution
1.3 Comparisontotheoddsratio
1.4 Statisticalsignificance(confidence)andrelativerisk
1.5 Tests
2 Workedexample
3 Seealso
3.1 Statisticalratios
4 References
5 Externallinks
Statisticaluseandmeaning
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_risk 1/7
8/21/2016 RelativeriskWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia
Relativeriskisusedfrequentlyinthestatisticalanalysisofbinaryoutcomeswheretheoutcomeofinteresthas
relativelylowprobability.Itisthusoftensuitedtoclinicaltrialdata,whereitisusedtocomparetheriskof
developingadisease,inpeoplenotreceivingthenewmedicaltreatment(orreceivingaplacebo)versuspeople
whoarereceivinganestablished(standardofcare)treatment.Alternatively,itisusedtocomparetheriskof
developingasideeffectinpeoplereceivingadrugascomparedtothepeoplewhoarenotreceivingthetreatment
(orreceivingaplacebo).Itisparticularlyattractivebecauseitcanbecalculatedbyhandinthesimplecase,butis
alsoamenabletoregressionmodelling,typicallyinaPoissonregressionframework.
Inasimplecomparisonbetweenanexperimentalgroupandacontrolgroup:
Arelativeriskof1meansthereisnodifferenceinriskbetweenthetwogroups.
AnRRof<1meanstheeventislesslikelytooccurintheexperimentalgroupthaninthecontrolgroup.
AnRRof>1meanstheeventismorelikelytooccurintheexperimentalgroupthaninthecontrolgroup.
Bayesianinterpretation
Substituting and
Inotherwords,youcanseetherelativeriskinbayesiantermsastheposteriorratiooftheexposure(i.e.after
seeingthedisease)normalisedbythepriorratioofexposure.[3]Insimpleterms,iftheposteriorratioofexposureis
similartothatoftheprior,Iwillendupwithanequaleffect,or1,indicatingnoassociationwiththedisease,
sinceitdidn'tchangemybeliefsoftheexposure.Ifontheotherhandtheposteriorratioofexposureissmalleror
greaterthanthatofthepriorratio,thenthediseasehavechangedmyviewoftheexposuredanger,andthe
magnitudeofthischangeistherelativerisk.
Theoddsratiocanbethenviewedinsimilartermsasfollows
orcanbealternativelydefinedintermsofexposuresimilartotheabovedefinitionas
Logtransformationforapproximatinganormaldistribution
AsaconsequenceoftheDeltamethod,thelogoftherelativeriskhasasamplingdistributionthatisapproximately
normalwithvariancethatcanbeestimatedbyaformulainvolvingthenumberofsubjectsineachgroupandthe
eventratesineachgroup(seeDeltamethod).[4]Thispermitstheconstructionofaconfidenceinterval(CI)whichis
symmetricaroundlog(RR),i.e.,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_risk 2/7
8/21/2016 RelativeriskWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia
where isthestandardscoreforthechosenlevelofsignificanceandSEthestandarderror.Theantilogcanbe
takenofthetwoboundsofthelogCI,givingthehighandlowboundsforanasymmetricconfidenceinterval
aroundtherelativerisk.
Inregressionmodels,thetreatmentistypicallyincludedasadummyvariablealongwithotherfactorsthatmay
affectrisk.Therelativeriskisnormallyreportedascalculatedforthemeanofthesamplevaluesoftheexplanatory
variables.
Comparisontotheoddsratio
Relativeriskisdifferentfromtheoddsratio,althoughitasymptoticallyapproachesitforsmallprobabilities.Inthe
exampleofassociationofsmokingtolungcancerconsideredabove,ifaissubstantiallysmallerthanb,then
a/(a+b) a/b.Andifsimilarlycismuchsmallerthand,thenc/(c+d) c/d.Thus
Thisistheoddsratio.
Infact,theoddsratiohasmuchwideruseinstatistics,sincelogisticregression,oftenassociatedwithclinicaltrials,
workswiththelogoftheoddsratio,notrelativerisk.Becausethelogoftheoddsratioisestimatedasalinear
functionoftheexplanatoryvariables,theestimatedoddsratiofor70yearoldsand60yearoldsassociatedwith
typeoftreatmentwouldbethesameinalogisticregressionmodelswheretheoutcomeisassociatedwithdrugand
age,althoughtherelativeriskmightbesignificantlydifferent.Incaseslikethis,statisticalmodelsoftheoddsratio
oftenreflecttheunderlyingmechanismsmoreeffectively.
Sincerelativeriskisamoreintuitivemeasureofeffectiveness,thedistinctionisimportantespeciallyincasesof
mediumtohighprobabilities.IfactionAcarriesariskof99.9%andactionBariskof99.0%thentherelativerisk
isjustover1,whiletheoddsassociatedwithactionAaremorethan10timeshigherthantheoddswithB.
Inepidemiologicalresearch,theoddsratioiscommonlyusedforcasecontrolstudies,asodds,butnot
probabilities,areusuallyestimated.[5]Relativeriskisusedinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandcohortstudies.[6]
Instatisticalmodelling,approacheslikepoissonregression(forcountsofeventsperunitexposure)haverelative
riskinterpretations:theestimatedeffectofanexplanatoryvariableismultiplicativeontherate,andthusleadstoa
riskratioorrelativerisk.Logisticregression(forbinaryoutcomes,orcountsofsuccessesoutofanumberoftrials)
mustbeinterpretedinoddsratioterms:theeffectofanexplanatoryvariableismultiplicativeontheoddsandthus
leadstoanoddsratio.
Statisticalsignificance(confidence)andrelativerisk
Whetheragivenrelativeriskcanbeconsideredstatisticallysignificantisdependentontherelativedifference
betweentheconditionscompared,theamountofmeasurementandthenoiseassociatedwiththemeasurement(of
theeventsconsidered).Inotherwords,theconfidenceonehas,inagivenrelativeriskbeingnonrandom(i.e.itis
notaconsequenceofchance),dependsonthesignaltonoiseratioandthesamplesize.
Expressedmathematically,theconfidencethataresultisnotbyrandomchanceisgivenbythefollowingformula
bySackett:[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_risk 3/7
8/21/2016 RelativeriskWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia
Forclarity,theaboveformulaispresentedintabularformbelow.
Dependenceofconfidencewithnoise,signalandsamplesize(tabularform)
Inwords,theconfidenceishigherifthenoiseislowerand/orthesamplesizeislargerand/ortheeffectsize
(signal)isincreased.Theconfidenceofarelativeriskvalue(anditsassociatedconfidenceinterval)isnot
dependentoneffectsizealone.Ifthesamplesizeislargeandthenoiseislowasmalleffectsizecanbemeasured
withgreatconfidence.Whetherasmalleffectsizeisconsideredimportantisdependentonthecontextofthe
eventscompared.
Inmedicine,smalleffectsizes(reflectedbysmallrelativeriskvalues)areusuallyconsideredclinicallyrelevant(if
thereisgreatconfidenceinthem)andarefrequentlyusedtoguidetreatmentdecisions.Arelativeriskof1.10may
seemverysmall,butoveralargenumberofpatientswillmakeanoticeabledifference.Whetheragiventreatment
isconsideredaworthyendeavourisdependentontherisks,benefitsandcosts.
Tests
ThedistributionofthelogRelativeRiskisapproximatelynormalwith:
Thestandarderrorforthelog(RelativeRisk)isapproximately:[8]
Thisisanasymptoticapproximation.
Theriskratioconfidenceintervalsarebasedonthesamplingdistributionof
Thisisconsideredtobe(approximately)normalwith
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_risk 4/7
8/21/2016 RelativeriskWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia
wheremisthemeanands2isthevariance.Approximate95%confidenceintervals(CI)fortherelativeriskare
Inapplicationsusingthisestimatorthesamplesizeshouldbeatleast25.
Workedexample
Example1:riskreduction Example2:riskincrease
Experimentalgroup(E) Controlgroup(C) Total (E) (C) Total
Events(E) EE=15 CE=100 115 EE=75 CE=100 175
Nonevents
EN=135 CN=150 285 EN=75 CN=150 225
(N)
Totalsubjects
ES=EE+EN=150 CS=CE+CN=250 400 ES=150 CS=250 400
(S)
Eventrate EER=EE/ES=0.1,or CER=CE/CS=0.4,or EER=0.5 CER=0.4
(ER) 10% 40% (50%) (40%)
Example3:Ratiosarepresentedforeachofexperimentalandcontrolgroups.Inthediseaserisk22
tableabove,supposea+c=1andb+d=1andthetotalnumberofpatientsandhealthypeoplebemandn,
respectively.Thenprevalenceratiobecomesp=m/(m+n).Wecanputq=m/n=p/(1p).Thus
Ifpissmallenough,thenqwouldbesmallenoughandeitherof(b/d)qand(a/c)qwouldbesmallenoughto
beregardedas0comparedwith1.RRwouldbereducedtotheoddratioasabove.
AmongJapanese,notasmallfractionofpatientsofBehet'sdiseasearebestowedwithaspecificHLAtype,
namelyHLAB51gene.[9]Inasurvey,theproportionis63%ofthepatientswiththisgene,whileinhealthy
peopletheratiois21%.[9]IfthefiguresareconsideredtoberepresentativeformostJapanese,usingthe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_risk 5/7
8/21/2016 RelativeriskWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia
valuesof12,700patientsinJapanin1984andtheJapanesepopulationabout120millionin1982,then
RR=6.40.Comparewiththeoddratio6.41.
Seealso
Absoluteriskreduction
WikimediaCommonshas
(Population)attributablerisk
mediarelatedtoStatistics
Confidenceinterval forrelativerisk.
Numberneededtotreat(NNT)
Numberneededtoharm(NNH)
OpenEpi
EpiInfo
Therarediseaseassumption
Statisticalratios
Bayesfactor
Hazardratio
Oddsratio
References
1.SistromCL,GarvanCW(January2004)."Proportions,odds,andrisk".Radiology.230(1):1219.
doi:10.1148/radiol.2301031028.PMID14695382.
2.Weddell,Angie."EvidencefromSafetyResearchtoUpdateCyclingTrainingMaterialsinCanada"(PDF).Universityof
BritishColumbia.Retrieved30September2013.
3.StatisticalMethodsinMedicalResearch,FourthEditionhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9780470773666
4.Seee.g.StataFAQonCIsforoddsratios,hazardratios,IRRsandRRRsat
https://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/2deltameth.html
5.DeeksJ(1998)."Whencanoddsratiosmislead?Oddsratiosshouldbeusedonlyincasecontrolstudiesandlogistic
regressionanalyses".BMJ.317(7166):11556.doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7166.1155a.PMC1114127 .PMID9784470.
6."Oddsratioversusrelativerisk".MedicalUniversityofSouthCarolina.Archivedfromtheoriginalon30April2009.
RetrievedSeptember8,2005.
7."Whyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsfailbutneedn't:2.Failuretoemployphysiologicalstatistics,ortheonlyformulaa
cliniciantrialistiseverlikelytoneed(orunderstand!)".165(9).October2001:122637.PMC81587 .
PMID11706914.
8.Jewell,NicholasP.(2004).Statisticsforepidemiology.BocaRaton:Chapman&Hall/CRC.ISBN9781584884330.
9.OhnoS,OhguchiM,HiroseS,MatsudaH,WakisakaA,AizawaM(1982)."CloseassociationofHLABW51,MT2and
Behet'sdisease,"InInaba,G,ed.(1982).Behet'sDisease:PathogeneticMechanismandClinicalFuture:Proceedings
oftheInternationalConferenceonBehet'sDisease,heldOctober2324,1981,pp.7379,Tokyo:UniversityofTokyo
Press,ISBN0860083225.
Externallinks
EBMglossary(http://www.cebm.utoronto.ca/glossary/)
Relativeriskonlinecalculator(http://www.medcalc.org/calc/relative_risk.php)
Retrievedfrom"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Relative_risk&oldid=734119391"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_risk 6/7
8/21/2016 RelativeriskWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia
Thispagewaslastmodifiedon12August2016,at08:09.
TextisavailableundertheCreativeCommonsAttributionShareAlikeLicenseadditionaltermsmayapply.
Byusingthissite,youagreetotheTermsofUseandPrivacyPolicy.Wikipediaisaregisteredtrademark
oftheWikimediaFoundation,Inc.,anonprofitorganization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_risk 7/7