Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Intake : CT105-3.5-2-PDT
Campus : TPM
Submission Date :
This in-course assignment comprises of two distinct parts. Part 1 is individual work with the
aim of preparing you for the recruitment process and Part 2 is group work.
B. Presentation
Your presentation will be assessed as follows:
1. Delivery: speed, eye contact, clarity
2. Content: well organized and explains key ideas well
3. Response to questions: able to answer questions well
The assignment must draw upon the materials taught in lectures and any research deemed
appropriate. Your group should consist of four members, however, additional team members
will be allowed based on the discretion of the module lecturer. The word limit for Part A is
3500 words.
Performance Criteria
Job Advertisement
Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not
Cover Letter
Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not
CV
Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not
Professional Body Role
Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not
Codes of Conduct
Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not
Additional Comments
Marking Criteria
Demonstrated comprehensive research with detailed evidence. High level of analysis performed,
exceptional and thorough knowledge and understanding displayed with regard to application. This
includes analysis and evaluation of facts followed by results of evaluation. Good quality
documentation with no spelling or grammatical errors, presented in a professional manner, following
proper sequencing and flow. Displayed evidence of critical appraisal.
Adequate research conducted with fair detail of evidence presented. Moderate level of understanding,
analysis and knowledge displayed. Some level of relevance included in terms of application. Moderate
level of analysis and evaluation of facts followed by results comparison. Good level documentation
presented. Some level of reflection was evident in the documentation. Moderate level of critical
appraisal.
Low level research conducted. Some evidence of research displayed. Basic level of understanding and
knowledge analysis displayed. Satisfactory level of documentation. No evaluation and analysis of
facts, no results comparison performed. Satisfactory or low level of reflection displayed. No level of
critical appraisal demonstrated.
B. Report Guidelines