IPCRF Worksheets 2017

REPUBLIC OF T
Department
National Ca
SCHOOLS DIV
Ma
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMM

Rating Scale for D
EMPLOYEE:
POSITION::
DEPARTMENT/SCHOOL:
RATING PERIOD : April 2016 to March 2017
Major Key Result Wt. Per

Final Area Objectives KRA
Outcomes (KRA)
1. Ensured supervision of instruction
Monitoring and and provided technical
MFO -2 Evaluation of assistance to teachers as
Basic School evidenced by:
Education Curriculum a. Supervisory Plan
Services and b. Form 178/STAR Observation 25%
Instruction tool
40% c. Pre and/or Post Conference
d. Anecdotal Report
e. Scheduled intravisitation
within the rating period.
2. Ensured the monitoring of
learners' performance through
the following:
a. Quarterly Exams
b. Performance tasks results 10%
c. Written work results
at the end of every quarter
3. Ensured on time checking and
submission of the following:
a. Lesson Plan'
b. Teachers Attendance (F-48) 5%
c. Assessment Tools
d. School Forms
e. Intervention Scheme
1. Intensified support and technical
assistance to teachers through:
Human a. LAC Sessions
Resource b. Training/seminars in different
Development levels
20% c. SBIM/Monthly Professional
Meeting
d. Promotion 15%
e. Continuing education
(Graduate Program and
short-term courses)
f. Scholarship programs
g. Coaching and Mentoring
program
within the rating period
2. Established development plan

for teachers.
5%
1. Ensured utilization of learning

materials such as: 8%
School * Students Learning Materials
Resource * Teachers Guide
Management * Reference Materials
15% *Instructional Materials
2. Ensured the utililization of the

department facilities and supply
materials within the rating period.
7%
7%
1. Strengthened participation in
seminars ,workshops, conferences
Professional and/or trainings within the school
Growth and year (school, district, division, regional,
Development national and/or international) as
15% evidenced by:
5%
a. Resource speakership/paper
presentation
b. Committee chairmanship
c. Facilitation
d. TWG membership
e. being a Trainer
2. Upgraded Professional Education

through the Graduate Program
5%
3. Enhanced Professional Education

through any of the following:
a. Short-term courses/tech-voc
b. Special trainings 5%
c. Seminars (at least 10 days)
d. TESDA courses related to field
of specialization
School-Based 1. Ensured participation in the

Management development of SIP/AIP within 5%
Plan the given time.
5%
Special Tasks 1. Developed two of the following:

and Other a. Action plan
Assignments b. Action Research
5%
5% c. Training matrix
d. Assessment Tool
e. Programs/Activities aligned to 5%
SBM/SIP/AIP
f. Other tasks in exigency of
service
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor
Name of Principal Name o

Principal Head
Rater
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
Below 1.499 Poor
Name of Principal Name of D

Principal Depa
Rater
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
Department of Education
National Capital Region
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE
Manila
RFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Rating Scale for Department Heads
NAME OF RATER:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW: April ___, 201
Performance Indicators Rating

(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Actual Results
E Q
100% of teachers were supervised 100% of teachers were

and provided technical assistance E supervised and provided 5
with excellent performance technical assistance
Q Excellent 5
T June to August
100% of the teachers were

monitoring the learners' performance E 5
satisfying the following indicators:
a. Accuracy
b. Updated Q 5
c. Orderliness
d. Completeness
e. Compliant to DepEd Order No. 8 T
s. 2015
E 5
100% of the indicators were checked
with no errors/revisions and submitted
Q 5
on time
100% of the teachers were provided

with the following:
a. LAC Sessions E 5
b. Training/seminars in different
levels
c. SBIM/Monthly Professional
Meeting
d. Promotion Q 5
(Graduate Program and
short-term courses)
g. Coaching and Mentoring T
program
E 5
Prepared and submitted one
comprehensive development
Q 5
plan for teachers to the school head
before the start of the school year.
T
100% of the learning materials were

utilized such as:
* Students Learning Materials E 5
* Teachers Guide
* Reference Materials
*Instructional Materials
Q 5
a. Adequate
a. Availability
b. Beneficial
c. Relevance
T
d. Updated
100% of the learners and teachers
utilized the department facilities and
E 5
supply materials satisfying the following
E 5
indicators:
a. Functional
b. Sufficiency Q 5
c. Availability
d. Well-maintained
e. updated T
5 evidences were satisfied with

E 5
outstanding rating within the school
year
Q 5
Completed the program

Completed the Graduate Program with E MA/EdD/PhD 5
superior General Weighted Average
Superior (GWA)
Q 1.0 - 1.25 5
96-100
Completed at least 2 programs within

E 5
the rating period.
E 5
Submitted SIP/AIP with no errors/
revision within the given time.
Q 5
100% completion and implementation

of two of the following:
a. Action plan
E 5
b. Action Research E 5
c. Training matrix
d. Assessment Tool
e. Programs/Activities aligned to
SBM/SIP/AIP
f. Other tasks in exigency of
service
Q 5
were attained with an outstanding
evaluation within the rating period.
FINAL RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
Name of Head Teacher Name of ASD

Head Teacher III/VI Asst. Schools Divis
Ratee Approving
FINAL RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
Name of Department Head Name of ASD

Department Head Asst. Schools Division
Ratee Approving
April ___, 2017
Rating Scale
Ave.
T Score
Rating
5.000 1.250
5.000 0.500
5
5.000 0.250
5.000 0.750
5.000 0.250
5.000 0.400
5.000 0.350
5.000 0.350
5.000 0.250
5.000 0.250
5.000 0.250
5.000 0.250
5.000 0.250
5.000 0.250
FINAL RATING 5.000

ADJECTIVAL RATING OUTSTANDING
Name of ASDS In-Charge

Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Authority
FINAL RATING 1.7500

Approving Authority
REPUBLIC OF
Departmen
National C
SCHOOLS D
M
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COM

Rating Scale
EMPLOYEE:
POSITION::
DEPARTMENT/SCHOOL:

Outcomes (KRA)
MFO -2 1. Intensified instructional supervision
Basic to improve learning outcomes
Education Instructional with outstanding technical
10%
Services Leadership assistance given at th end of
35% the rating period.
2. Ensured learners' reading profi-

ciency to independent level
(silent and oral) at the end of the
5%
School Year.
Elementary : Grade 3
Secondary : Grade 7
3. Attained learning
outcomes based on the learners'
5%
Grade Point Average at the end
of the rating period.
4. Improved access performance
indicators at the end of the rating
10%
period.
1. Ensured the learners with a
Learning child-friendly learning environment
Environment with zero complaint and prompt
20% action within the day.
8%
2. Installed sustainable implement-

ation plan for the maintenance
of the following:
a. Ancillary Services
* Canteen/Feeding Room
* Library
* Clinic
* Guidance
* Property
b. Water and Sanitation
c. Building Structure 7%
d. Disaster Preparedness
e. Safety and Security
f. Materials Recovery Facility
g. ICT Room/Lab
3. Ensured provision of learning

materials such as:
* Students Learning Materials
* Teachers Guide
* Instructional Materials
within the rating period 5%
5%
1. Intensified support and technical

assistance to teaching and non-
Human teaching personnel through:
Resource a. LAC sessions
Management b. Training/ seminars in different
20% levels
c. SBIM/Monthly Professional Meeting
d. Promotion 15%
(Graduate Program and Short-
Term courses)
g. Coaching and Mentoring
program
2. Established development plan

for teaching and non-teaching
5%
personnel
1. Established at least 5 sustainable

Parents linkages/partnerships with other
Involvement sectors, agencies, LGUs and NGOs
5%
and through Adopt a School Program
Community Policies within a school year.
Partnership
10% 2. Intensified involvement of the
School Governing Council (SGC)
and General Parents-Teachers
Association (GPTA) in at least 5
major school activities
(i.e. Brigada Eskwela, Foundation
5%
Day, Early Registration, School
Reading Camp, NAT Enrichment
Classes , Graduation , and other
year-end related activities and
Fund Raising Projects) at the end
of the school year.
1. Intensified school leadership,
School management, and operations
Leadership, functions focusing on the following:
Management a. Maintained school data base
and system such as LIS, EBEIS, etc.
Operations b. Implemented SIP, AIP, APP
10% c. Engaged the stakeholders in
improving school facilities
10%
d. Ensured quality standards for
equipment and facilities procured
or given to school
e. Conducted monitoring and
evaluation of all PPAs
with outstanding performance
within the rating period at
all times.
1. Ensured submission of financial

reports on or before the scheduled
2%
date without error or revision on
the scheduled date
1. Ensured school transparency

Fiscal and accountability mechanism
Management on the following:
5% a. Allocation and prioritization
of funds for improvement and
maintenance
b. Monitoring, accounting, and
reporting of utilized school funds
and other resources
c. Coordination with stakeholders
on mobilization 3%
d. Submission of financial reports
on or before the scheduled date
without error or revision
e. School resources were utilized
in accordance with DepEd policies
and accounting and auditing
rules and regulations and other
pertinent guidelines
submitted before the scheduled
date.
3%
1. Ensured implementation of at
Leading least one leading innovation in all
Innovations aspects of school governance and 3%
5% leadership adapted/adopted by
the Division within the school year.
2. Ensured implementation of five

or more very highly effective
2%
innovations in all aspects of school
governance and leadership within
the school year.
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
Below 1.499 Poor

Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Rater
Manila
PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Rating Scale for School Heads
NAME OF RATER:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW: April ___
Performance Indicators R
E
100% of the teachers were supervised

with outstanding technical E 5
assistance given at the end of
the rating period. Q
100% of the learners attained

independent level (silent and oral)
E/Q 5
at the end of the school year.
90-100% of the learners achieved

80% proficiency at the end
E/Q 5
of the rating period.
Increased enrolment by 5%
5
or more (5%)
E
Zero dropout rate (5%)
5
100% of the DepEd programs were
E 5
effectively implemented
* child protection policy
* zone of peace
* project SMILE
* drug awareness and anti-smoking Q
* inclusive education
* health and nutrition awareness
* feeding program
* Gender awareness Development
T
with zero complaint and prompt
action within the day
100% of the existing facilities such as:
a. Ancillary Services
* Canteen/Feeding Room
* Library E 5
* Clinic
* Guidance
* Property
b. Water and Sanitation
c. Building Structure
d. Disaster Preparedness
e. Safety and Security Q
f. Materials Recovery Facility
g. ICT Room/Lab
was maintained and managed at
all times with quality indicators such
as:
* well-maintained
* functional T
* accessible
* sufficient
* sustainable
100% of the learning materials were
utilized such as:
* Students Learning Materials E 5
* Teachers Guide
* Instructional Materials
Q
* adequate
*availability
*beneficial
T
* relevance
T
* updated
100% of the teaching and non-
teaching personnel was provided
with the following: E 5
a. LAC sessions
b. Training/ seminars in different
levels
c. SBIM/Monthly Professional Meeting
d. Promotion Q
(Graduate Program and Short-
Term courses)
g. Coaching and Mentoring T
program
Prepared and submitted one
E 5
comprehensive development
plan for teaching and non-teaching
Q
personnel to te SDO before the start
of the school year.
T
100% of sustainable linkages /

partnerships with other sectors, E 5
agencies, LGUs and NGOs through
Adopt a School Program Policies
was established with outstanding Q
rating within a school year.
At least 5 major school activities

E 5
were participated by School Governing
Council (SGC) ang General Parents-
Teachers Association (GPTA) with an
oustanding rating at the end of the
school year.
Q
Q
Five school leadership, management,

and operations functions were
intensified with outstanding E 5
performance within the rating
period at all times.
E 5
100% of the financial reports were
submitted with no errors or
Q
revisions on or before the scheduled
date.
T
100% of the school transparency and

accountability mechanisms were
ensured with no error or revisions
E 5
in the reports submitted before
the scheduled date.
E 5
One leading innovation was
E 5
implemented using all aspects
of school governance and leadership
adapted/adopted by the Division
within the school year. Q
Five or more very highly effective

E 5
innovations were implemented in
all aspects of school governance
and leadership within the school
Q
year.
FINAL RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
Name of Principal Na
Principal Schools Division S
Ratee Appro
April ___, 2017
Rating Scale
Ave.
Q T Score
Rating
5.000 0.500
5
5 5.000 0.250
5 5.000 0.250
5.000 0.500
5 5.000 0.400
5 5.000 0.350
5.000 0.250
5
5
5.000 0.250
5 5.000 0.750
5 5.000 0.250
5.000 0.250
5.000 0.250
5
5
5.000 0.500
5
5 5.000 0.100
5.000 0.150
5
5.000 0.150
5.000 0.150
5.000 0.100
FINAL RATING 5.000

Name of SDS
Schools Division Superintandent
Approving Authority
REPUBLIC OF
Departmen
National C
SCHOOLS D
M
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE CO
Rating Scale for Master Teach
EMPLOYEE:
POSITION::
DEPARTMENT/SCHOOL:

Outcomes (KRA)
1. Strengthened teaching practices
MFO -2 carried out within the regular
Basic teaching load for the grade/subject
Education area through:
Services a. ICT integration
b. Develop and utilize indigenized/
25%
Instructional localized instructional materials
Competence c. Functional classroom environment
50% d. Demonstration lesson
e.Remediation/Intervention program
at the end of the school year always.
2. Attained 100% of the required

learning competencies as evidenced
by 75% and above General Scholastic 20%
Average at the end of every quarter
3. Developed action research aligned 5%

to DepEd Research Agenda within
the rating period.
1. Institutionalized 100% observation
of teachers and provided technical
assistance as:
Instructional a. Form 178/STAR Observation tool 10%
Supervision b. Pre and/or Post Conference
25% c. Anecdotal Report
every quarter
2. Ensured mentoring and coaching
in the following activities:
a. Lesson Planning
b. Development of Learning Materials 10%
c. Instructional Delivery
d. Test construction
e. Classroom Management
3. Ensured checking of Lesson Plan
focusing on the following:
a. Alignment to Curriculum Guide
b. Complete parts
c. Updated
5%
d. with SMART objectives
e. addressed the learning needs of
the learners
in the assigned grade level /subject
area weekly.
1. Strengthened participation in
seminars ,workshops, conferences
Professional and/or trainings within the school
Growth and year (school, district, division, regional,
Development national and/or international) as
20% evidenced by:
10%
a. Resource speakership/paper
presentation
b. Committee chairmanship
c. Facilitation
d. TWG
e. being a Teacher-Trainer
5%
2. Upgraded Professional Education
through the Graduate Program
5%
3. Enhanced Professional Education

a. Short-term courses/tech-voc
b. Special trainings 5%
c. Seminars (at least 10 days)
d. TESDA courses related to field
of specialization
1. Improved performance on
Special Tasks special task or assignment given
and Other by the immediate superior relative 5%
Assignments to school functions or activities
5% in a given period of time within
the school year always.
(Outside the regular/full teaching
load )
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
Below 1.499 Poor
Name of Principal Name o

Principal Ma
Rater
Manila
AL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

cale for Master Teacher I & II (Elementary/Secondary)
NAME OF RATER:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW: April ___
Performance Indicators Ra
E
Five indicators were satisfied in

E 5
strengthening the teaching practices
carried out with the regular teaching
load with an outstanding rating at the
end of the school year always.
Q
100% of the required learning competencies

were attained as eveidenced by E
75% and above General Scholastic 5
Average at the end of every quarter Q
T
100% completion of the action research
aligned to the DepEd Research Agenda
E 5
was conducted with the following
indicators:
a. developed tools/instruments
b. solved classroom-based problem Q
c. improved teaching practices
d. validated results and findings
e. improved systems and processes T
100% of teachers were observed and E 5

provided technical assistance with
excellent rating for every quarter
Q
100% of the teachers were mentored E 5

and coached in the different activities
with outstanding rating at the end of
every quarter always. Q
100% of the teachers' Lesson Plan were E 5

checked satisfying the 5 indicators
weekly.
Q
5 evidences were satisfied with

E 5
outstanding rating within the school
year
Completed the program

E 5
Completed the Graduate Program with E MA/EdD/PhD 5
superior General Weighted Average
Superior (GWA)
Q 1.0 - 1.25
96-100

E 5
the rating period.
100 % involvement to the scpecial task

or assignment given by the immediate
E 5
superior relative to school functions
or activities satisfying the following
indicators:
a. initiative
b. willingness
Q
c. cooperative
d. resourceful
e. creative
as a demonstration of higher self in a
T
given period of time with an outstanding
performance always.
FINAL RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
Name of Master Teacher Name of

Master Teacher I/II Asst. Schools
Ratee Appro
April ___, 2017
Rating Scale
Ave.
Q T Score
Rating
5 5.000 1.250
5.000 1.000
5
5
5.000 0.250
5.000 0.250
5
5.000 0.500
5
5.000 0.500
5
5
5.000 0.250
5 5.000 0.500
5.000 0.250
5.000 0.250
5.000 0.250
5.000 0.250
5
FINAL RATING 5.000


Approving Authority
REPUBL
Depa
Nati
SCHOO
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMA
Rating Scale for Regular
EMPLOYEE:
POSITION:
DEPARTMENT/SCHOOL:
RATING PERIOD : April 2016 - March 2017

Outcomes (KRA)
1. Developed updated Lesson Plans/
MFO -2 Daily Lesson Logs with complete
Basic parts and aligned with the DepEd 10%
Education Curriculum Guide
2. Improved teaching delivery using

ICT and other innovative teaching 10%
Teaching strategies/devices within the rating
Learning period always.
Process
30%
3. Ensured effective classroom

management in the context of 21st 10%
Century Learning Environment within
the rating period always.
1. Increased learners' outcomes as
compared to previous performance
through the following:
a. Learners' progress (Formative) 20%
b. Administration of appropriate
assessment tools
c. Recognition of learners'
outstanding performance
d. Regular monitoring of the
Learners' learners' attendance
Outcomes e. Conduct intervention and/or
40% remediation program/s to
struggling learners and enhance-
ment program/s to advanced
learners
based on the prescribed timeline
always
2. Ensured the passing General

Scholastic Average of the learners 15%
for the Grade Level at the end of
the school year.
3. Intensified feedbacks/updates
to parents/guardians on the 5%
learners' class standing at the
end of every quarter.
1. Ensured participation in regular

meetings/conferences with parents/ 3%
Community guardians and other stakeholders
Involvement quarterly.
5%
2. Ensured active participation in
projects/events/activities initiated 2%
by the school and stakeholders at
the end of the school year.
1. Enriched competencies from the
in-service trainings (INSET)/
Demonstration lessons attended 5%
as required by the principal and
supervisors within the rating period
always.
Professional 2. Upgraded Professional Education

Growth and through the Graduate Program 5%
Development
20%
3. Enhanced Professional Education 5%

a. short-term courses
b. Special trainings
c. Scholarship Programs
d. TESDA courses related to the
field of specialization
4. Strengthened membership and

participation in a professional
organization or club through: 5%
a. Attending meetings
b. Participation in at least 2 activities
c. Updating of membership status
d. Acted as officer, committee
chair or co-chair, facilitator,
resource person
within the rating period always.
1. Improved performance on
Special Tasks special task or assignment given
and Other by the immediate superior relative 5%
Assignments to school functions or activities
5% in a given period of time within
the school year always.
(Outside the regular/full teaching
load )
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
Below 1.499 Poor
Name of Rater Name

Master Teacher/Department Head Tea
Rater
Manila
VIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

g Scale for Regular Teacher I, II, III (Elementary/Secondary)
NAME OF RATER:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW: April ___, 20
Performance Indicators Rat

E Q
100% of updated Lesson Plans/ Daily E

Lesson Logs have complete parts and
aligned with the DepEd Curriculum Guide Q
T
100% of the lessons were delivered using
E
ICT and innovative teaching strategies/
devices with an outstanding evaluation
Q
100% or 5 indicators were ensured very

highly effective classroom management
E
in the context of 21st century learning
environment through the following:
a. Learner's Behavior
b. Level of Participation and interaction
c. Classroom routines and activities Q
d. Physical learning climate
e. Child-friendly and learner-centered
learning climate
T
within the rating period always. T
5 indicators were achieved with
E
100% of learners increased their
learning outcomes as compared to
previous performance based on the
prescribed timeline always.
100% of the learners attained the E

passing GSA for the Grade Level with
excellent rating at the end of the
School Year. Q
100% of the learners' parents/guardians

E
were provided feedbacks/updates
on the learners' class standing with
an excellent rating at the end of
Q
every quarter.
E
100 % of the regular meetings/
conferences were attended and
Q
participated actively with parents/
guardians and other stakeholders
with excellent rating at least every' T
quarter
E
E
100% of the regular meetings/
conferences were attended and Q
participated actively with excellent
T
rating at the end of the school year.
100 % of the competencies from the
E
in-service trainings(INSET)/ Demonstra-
tion lessons attended as required by
the principal and supervisor were
applied excellently as evidenced by: Q
a. Development of instructional
materials
b. Functional classroom environment
c. Facilitated LAC/meeting/ seminar
d. Conducted demonstration lesson/s T
e. Served as resource person in
professional meetings and the like
with the rating period always.
Completed the Graduate Program E

with superior General Weighted
Average.
Q

the rating period E
100 % involvement in a professional

organization through: E
a. Attending meetings
b. Participation in at least 2 activities
c. Updating of membership status
d. Acted as officer, committee chair Q
or co-chair, facilitator, and/or
resource person
T
T
100 % involvement to the scpecial task
or assignment given by the immediate
E
supeior relative to school functions
or activities satisfying the following
indicators:
a. initiative
b. willingness
Q
c. cooperative
d. resourceful
e. creative
as a demonstration of higher self in a
T
given period of time with an outstanding
performance always.
FINAL RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
Name of Ratee Name of Ap

Teacher I/II/III P
Ratee Approv
ORM
ndary)
April ___, 2017
Rating Scale
Ave.
T Score
Rating
FINAL RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
Name of Approving Authority

Principal
Approving Authority

IPCRF Worksheets 2017

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

IPCRF Worksheets 2017

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

REPUBLIC OF T

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMM

Major Key Result Wt. Per

2. Established development plan

1. Ensured utilization of learning

2. Ensured the utililization of the

2. Upgraded Professional Education

3. Enhanced Professional Education

School-Based 1. Ensured participation in the

Special Tasks 1. Developed two of the following:

Name of Principal Name o

Name of Principal Name of D

RFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Performance Indicators Rating

100% of teachers were supervised 100% of teachers were

100% of the teachers were

100% of the teachers were provided

100% of the learning materials were

5 evidences were satisfied with

Completed the program

Completed at least 2 programs within

100% completion and implementation

Name of Head Teacher Name of ASD

Name of Department Head Name of ASD

FINAL RATING 5.000

Name of ASDS In-Charge

Name of ASDS In-Charge

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COM

Major Key Result Wt. Per

2. Ensured learners' reading profi-

2. Installed sustainable implement-

3. Ensured provision of learning

1. Intensified support and technical

2. Established development plan

1. Established at least 5 sustainable

1. Ensured submission of financial

1. Ensured school transparency

2. Ensured implementation of five

Name of ASDS In-Charge

PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

100% of the teachers were supervised

100% of the learners attained

90-100% of the learners achieved

100% of sustainable linkages /

At least 5 major school activities

Five school leadership, management,

100% of the school transparency and

Five or more very highly effective

FINAL RATING 5.000

Major Key Result Wt. Per

2. Attained 100% of the required

3. Developed action research aligned 5%

3. Enhanced Professional Education

Name of Principal Name o

AL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Five indicators were satisfied in

100% of the required learning competencies

100% of teachers were observed and E 5

100% of the teachers were mentored E 5

100% of the teachers' Lesson Plan were E 5

5 evidences were satisfied with

Completed the program

Completed at least 2 programs within

100 % involvement to the scpecial task