Professional Documents
Culture Documents
se
Published by WIB, November 2001
lu
cia
TESTA FID 123 analyser
.
the European Organisation for Testing and Certification (EOTC) Registration No 0003
NO
CIRCULATION
se
This report has been produced for the in-house use of SIREP, WIB and EXERA members. The contents of
the report must not be divulged to persons not employed by SIREP, WIB and EXERA member companies
without the express consent of the issuing organisation.
lu
ABOUT SIREP-WIB-EXERA
SIREP-WIB-EXERA are international instrument users' associations who collaborate in the sponsoring,
planning and organisation of instrument evaluation programmes. They have the long term objective of
cia
encouraging improvements in the design, construction, performance and reliability of instrumentation and
related equipment.
SIREP-WIB-EXERA are formally recognised by the European Organisation for Testing and Certification
(EOTC) as the Agreement Group for International Instrumentation Evaluation, Registration No 0003.
er
The evaluation of the selected instruments is undertaken by approved, independent laboratories with
respect to the manufacturers' performance specifications and to relevant international and national
standards.
Each evaluation report describes the assessment of the instrument concerned and the result of the testing.
m
No approval or certification is intended or given. It is left to the reader to determine whether the instrument
is suitable for its intended application. All reports are circulated throughout the entire membership of
SIREP-WIB-EXERA.
om
cia
Acetex Chimie Infraserv Hoechst
Agences de Bassin Institut National de Recherche et de Scurit
Air Liquide Italcementi / CTG
Air Products & Chemicals Incorporated Jacobs Engineering BV
er
Akzo Nobel Engineering KEMA Nederland BV
Bellt GCA Lubrizol France
BNFL Lyonnaise des Eaux
BP-Amoco Corporation Mobil Research & Development Corporation
mMossgas (Pty) Ltd
British Energy plc
CEA Nanci
Centre dEssais des Propulseurs Nederlands Meetinstituut
Chiyoda Corporation NV Nederlandse Gasunie
om
Nestec Ltd
Cogema
Process Management & Control
Corus Group BV PSA Peugeot-Citroen
Dassault Aviation RATP
DOW Benelux Renault SA
DSM Services Engineering-Stamicarbon Rhoditech
Dupont de Nemours BV-NL Rijks Instituut voor Kust en Zee (RIKZ)
rC
GEMCEA
Gnrale des Eaux
GTIE Associate Member
NO
lu
P.O. Box 9035, 6800 ET Arnhem
The Netherlands
Telephone +31 26 3 56 91 11
Telefax +31 26 3 51 56 06
cia
KEMA
is an independent company whose goal is to provide international professional
services and know-how, on a commercial basis, in the field of (electrical) energy
systems and the environment, as well as in the area of quality related issues such as
er
testing and certification.
Report No E 2720 K 01
se
Section Page
1 INTRODUCTION 1
lu
2 MAJOR FINDINGS AND COMMENTS 2
2.1 Instrument performance 2
2.2 Comments on construction and use 7
2.3 Comments on documentation 7
cia
2.4 Cost of ownership 7
2.5 Manufacturer's comments 7
3 TEST RESULTS 8
3.1 Results' summary 8
er
4 MANUFACTURER'S DATA 18
APPENDIX I EMC
APPENDIX II Manufacturer's QA procedures and instrument status
rC
FIGURES
se
FID 123
lu
cia
er
m
om
The High Temperature Flame Ionisation Detector (FID) measures Total Hydro-
Carbons in catalytic and thermal after-burner plants, waste gas industries, room and
environmental air, solvent recovery plants and vehicle exhaust gases.
Special Benefits:
rC
FID - 123:
NO
se
Flame-Ionisation-Detector FID 123
lu
Power input: 400W (approx.), without sample line
Ambient temperature: Max. + 45C (110F)
Reproducibility: Range 1 + 3% all other ranges + 1%
Ranges: 5 measuring ranges
cia
10/100/1000/10.000/100.000ppm
(other ranges on customer request)
Recorder output: 0-10V / 0-20mA or 2-10V / 4-20mA
Lowest range: 0-10ppm relative to propane (calibration
gas=C3H8)
er
Zero & Span gas consumption: 3-4 litres/min.
Zero drift: + 1% in 24 hours
Combustion gas: Either afterpurified Hydrogen or a
Helium/Hydrogen mixture (60/40%)
m
Combustion gas consumption: H2 30-49ml/min; H2/He 80-100ml/min
Supply for heated sample line: Regulated and controlled by thermocouple
Max. sample temperature: 300C (572F) in continous operation
om
Optional Extras:
fo
lu
Author: P.H.J. Gamelkoorn
Reported by KEMA Nederland B.V. on behalf of International Instrument Users' Association WIB and the
manufacturer
cia
SIREP-WIB-EXERA Report E 2720 K 01
Index classification 4.2
The full report comprises 26 pages: the abridged report comprises the first 7 pages of the full report
er
November 2001
1 INTRODUCTION
m
This report describes the evaluation of a model Testa FID (Flame Ionisation Detector) Analyser
manufactured by Testa GmbH. The instrument was a standard production model manufactured in
Germany.
om
The instrument was evaluated to a test programme drawn up by WIB and KEMA Nederland B.V. and
agreed with WIB and the manufacturer. The test programme was based on IEC 770 : Part 1 : 1984
Methods of evaluating the performance of transmitters for use in industrial-process control systems.
The evaluation report was based on the discussions with WIB members, the TNO memorandum
(assessment of TV-Reports: HEC-MEMO-950031) and two reports performed by TV (references:
rC
Report no. 1529455 (according to the specifications in 13. BlmSchV) from August 1992 and the
additional Report no. 24014741 (according to the specifications in 17. BlmSchV) from February 1996).
The tested analyser is designed for continuous on line measurement of hydrocarbon in gaseous process
streams.
fo
3
C2H4 range 0 - 100 ppm(v) (about 0 - 100 mgC/m ).
All manufacturer's specifications are given as percentages of full scale, unless otherwise stated
T
Page 1 of 26 E 2720 K 01
sample flow : 3-4 l/min
sample temperature : max 200 C
se
smallest measuring range : 0-10 ppm(v) C3H8
warming-up time : from 20 C to 200 C approx. 15 min.
outputs : 0-10 V/0-20 mA or 2-10 V/4-20 mA
weight : approx. 15 kg.
lu
The sample chamber and detector were thermostatted at 180 C.
The instrument was delivered on 25 January 2001. The instrument was evaluated over a period of 6
months from January to July 2001. The draft report was issued in August 2001.
cia
2 MAJOR FINDINGS AND COMMENTS
These findings are summarised for ready reference and to give an overview of the evaluation. For a
er
complete assessment of the instrument the report must be read and considered as a whole.
All errors and changes are indicated as falling within arbitrary bands and compared with the
manufacturer's specification as folllows:
Page 2 of 26 E 2720 K 01
se
Test Results expressed as error % span Other results Manufacturers
< 0.1 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 5.0 specification
ACCURACY
Measured error i
lu
Conformity i
Maximum hysteresis i
cia
Repeatability <1%
Dead band
at zero i
at 25% span i
at 40% span i
er
Detection limit (3s) i
ENVIRONMENTAL TESTS
m
Mounting position
zero shift i
om
span change i
Vibration
10 to 60 Hz at 0.2g amplitude
(axes are given in Fig 13)
zero shift i
rC
span change i
Shock
zero shift i
span change i
fo
Page 3 of 26 E 2720 K 01
Test Results expressed as error % span Other results Manufacturers
se
< 0.1 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 5.0 specification
ERRORS
Drift
start up power on zero drift 1%/24hours
lu
zero shift at 5% span after 15 min
(ignition)
5 min i
1h i
4h i
cia
span change at 45% span
5 min i
1h i
4h i
er
long-term (limits over 33 days)
zero shift i
span change i
m
Over-range
zero shift i
span change i
om
DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR
Step response
lag time (T10) x (6 s) 1-2 sec.
fo
FUNCTIONAL TESTS
T
i
span change (as %/mbar) i
Page 4 of 26 E 2720 K 01
Test Results expressed as error % span Other results Manufacturers
se
< 0.1 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 5.0 specification
lu
Sample flow variation
(range 666 ml/min to 1232 ml/min)
zero shift (as %/100 ml/min) i
cia
span change (as %/100 ml/min) i
INTERFERENCE TESTS
Cross sensitivity
50.0 ppm(v) C2H4 in N2 reference
er
49.9 ppm(v) C2H4 in air
zero shift i
span change i
31.2 ppm(v) C4H10 in air
m
zero shift i
span change + 10.1%
49.9 ppm(v) C2H4/101 ppm(v) NO2 in air
om
zero shift i
span change i
49.9 ppm(v) C2H4/101 ppm(v) NO2/
98.7 ppm(v) CO in air
zero shift i
span shift i
51.7 ppm(v) C2H4/10.2 vol% CO2 in air
rC
zero shift i
span change i
49.9 ppm(v) C2H4/2.9 vol% H2O in air
zero shift i
span change i
fo
3
span concentration 15 mgC/m
15 vol% CO2 in N2
zero shift i
span change i
T
3
272 mg/m NO in N2
zero shift i
span change
NO
i
3
45 mg/m NO2 in N2
zero shift i
span change i
Page 5 of 26 E 2720 K 01
Test Results expressed as error % span Other results Manufacturers
se
< 0.1 < 0.5 < 1.0 < 5.0 specification
3
1216 mg/m SO2 in N2
zero shift i
span change i
3
229 mg/m NH3 in N2
lu
zero shift i
span change i
3
80 mg/m HCl in N2
zero shift i
cia
span change i
3
47 g/m H2O in N2
zero shift i
span change i
3
133 g/m H2O in N2
zero shift i
er
span change i
20.8 vol% O2 in N2
zero shift i
span change i
m
10.4 vol% O2 in N2
zero shift i
span change i
om
rC
fo
T
NO
Page 6 of 26 E 2720 K 01
2.2 Comments on construction and use
se
Construction
The analyser is housed in a metal casing. The analyser is robust and well constructed. The quality of
materials and standard of finish appears to be good.
lu
Installation and Commissioning
cia
2.3 Comments on documentation
The user manual (available in the English language as well as the German version) supplied with the
instrument gives comprehensive information on:
introduction
er
installation
commissioning
calibration diagram
flow diagram
spare parts list
m
technical specification
circuit diagram.
om
After installation of the analyser, the cost of ownership is based on the following items:
rC
The manufacturer doesnt specify the maintenance interval and frequency of changing filters etc.
Dynamic behaviour: Lag time and response time can be adjusted via bypass flow. If we increase the
bypass stream we can get a response time up to 10 ms.
NO
The presentation of the results as an error or deviation as percentage output-span is very confusing
form of presentation. We ask herewith to present this in a better way. For example in absolute figures.
Page 7 of 26 E 2720 K 01
3 TEST RESULTS
se
Unless otherwise stated, the tests were performed at 20 2 C, relative humidity 45 to 60 %, supply
voltage 230 2 V, frequency 50.0 0.5 Hz at the concentration range for C2H4 0-100 ppm(v).
lu
Unless otherwise stated, all errors are expressed as percent output span.
Unless otherwise stated, the analyser was tested at 0% and 50% span.
The estimated uncertainties (of the test results) for the different tests were:
cia
measured error : 0.2 %
conformity : 0.2 %
repeatability : 0.6 %
dead band : 6%
er
drift : 11 %
step response : 14 %
sample pressure variation : 11 %
sample flow variation : 11 %
sample temperature variation :
m
11 %
cross sensitivity : 11 %
The basic test gas concentration was about 50 ppm(v) C2H4 in N2.
om
Page 8 of 26 E 2720 K 01
3.1 Results' summary
se
Test Test results Manufacturer's specification/
Report ref
ACCURACY
lu
Measured error IEC 770; 6.1.2, (Fig 2)
limits of average error -0.07 to +0.04%
average zero error < -0.01%
average span error < -0.01%
cia
limits of average error -0.07 to +0.04% < 1%
er
Dead band IEC 770; 6.1.6, (Fig 4)
at zero < 0.1%
at 25% span < 0.1%
at 40% span < 0.1%
m
Detection limit (3s) < 0.1%
ENVIRONMENTAL TESTS
om
Vibration
10 to 60 Hz at 0.2g (axes are given in Fig zero shift span change IEC 770; 6.2.14
rC
11) < 0.1% +1.0% After vibrating, the analogue output lines
inside the analyser were vibrated loose from
the connector.
Page 9 of 26 E 2720 K 01
se
Test Test results Manufacturer's specification/
Report ref
ERRORS
Drift
lu
start-up IEC 770; 6.3.1 (Fig 10 and 11)
cia
- +5 min < 0.1% +1.0%
- +1 h < 0.1% < 0.1%
- +4 h < 0.1% < 0.1% reference
er
Over-range IEC 770; 6.2.15
zero shift +0.05% (performed at 2000% span)
span change +0.02%
Isolation resistance
each test > 100M Nr.1; chapter 7
(500 V applied between supply, output and
input terminals)
DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR
Step response
rC
Page 10 of 26 E 2720 K 01
se
Test Test results Manufacturer's
specification/
Report ref
FUNCTIONAL TESTS
lu
Sample pressure variation WIB test set-up, (Fig 7)
(range 800 to 1200 mbar (abs.))
zero shift +0.00002 %/mbar
span change +0.0006 %/mbar
regression formula
cia
y=ax+b
y=change, %
x=pressure, mbar (abs.)
factors at 0% span a=+0.00002 b=+0.017
factors at 50% span a=+0.0006 b=-0.64
er
zero shift +0.0007%/ C
span change -0.0004%/ C
regression formula
y=ax+b
y=change, %
m
x=temperature, C
factors at 0% span a=+0.0007 b=-0.026
factors at 50% span a=-0.0004 b=+0.051
om
Page 11 of 26 E 2720 K 01
se
Test Test results Manufacturer's
specification/
Report ref
INTERFERENCE TESTS
lu
Cross sensitivity zero shift span change WIB test set-up
50.0 ppm(v) C2H4 in N2 reference reference
49.9 ppm(v) C2H4 in air + 0.3% - 3.2%
31.2 ppm(v) C4H10 in air + 0.3% + 10.1%
49.9 ppm(v) C2H4/101 ppm(v) NO2 in air + 0.7% - 2.3%
cia
49.9 ppm(v) C2H4/101 ppm(v) NO2/
98.7 ppm(v) CO in air + 1.0% - 3.3%
51.7 ppm(v) C2H4/10.2 vol% CO2 in air - 0.1% - 4.6%
49.9 ppm(v) C2H4/2.9 vol% H2O in air + 0.2% - 3.9%
3
span concentration 15 mgC/m TV-Bericht Nr. 24014741
15 vol% CO2 in N2 < 0.5% < 0.5%
er
3
272 mg/m NO in N2 < 0.5% < 0.5%
3
45 mg/m NO2 in N2 < 0.5% < 0.5%
3
1216 mg/m SO2 in N2 < 0.5% < 0.5%
3
229 mg/m NH3 in N2 < 0.5% < 0.5%
3
80 mg/m HCl in N2 < 0.5% < 0.5%
3
47 g/m H2O in N2 + 0.5%
m+ 0.9%
3
133 g/m H2O in N2 + 0.6% + 1.3%
20,8 vol% O2 in N2 + 1.6% + 1.1%
10,4 vol% O2 in N2 + 0.6% < 0.5%
om
rC
fo
T
NO
Page 12 of 26 E 2720 K 01
se
0,08
lu
Average output error (%span)
0,06
0,04
0,02 upscale
0,00 downscale
cia
average
-0,02
terminal-based straight line
-0,04
-0,06
-0,08
er
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Input (% span)
m
Fig 2 Measured error, C2H4
om
0,08
0,06
rC
Average output error (% span)
0,04
0,02
upscale
0,00 downscale
average
-0,02
fo
-0,04
-0,06
-0,08
0 20 40 60
T
Input (% span)
NO
Page 13 of 26 E 2720 K 01
se
1
0,8
lu
0,6
Delta output (ppm(v))
0,4
0,2 at 0% span
0 at 25% span
-0,2 at 40% span
cia
-0,4
-0,6
-0,8
-1
-1 -0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2 0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1
er
Delta input (ppm(v))
2,5
1,5
Output error (% span)
rC
0,5
-0,5 at 0% span
at 15% span
-1,5
fo
-2,5
25 35 45 35 25 15 5 15 25
Temperature (C)
T
Page 14 of 26 E 2720 K 01
se
5,00
lu
Average error (% span)
3,00
at 0% span
at 50% span
1,00
cia
-1,00
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time (days)
0,20
Deviation from 1013 mbar (% span)
0,15
rC
0,10
0,05
at 0% span
0,00
at 50% span
-0,05
-0,10
fo
-0,15
-0,20
750 850 950 1050 1150 1250
Sample pressure (mbar)
T
NO
Page 15 of 26 E 2720 K 01
se
0,25
0,20
Deviation from 25 C (% span)
lu
0,15
0,10
0,05
at 0% span
0,00
at 50% span
-0,05
cia
-0,10
-0,15
-0,20
-0,25
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Sample temperature (C)
0,04
Deviation from 1,2 l/min (%span)
0,03
0,02
0,01
at 0% span
0,00
rC
at 50% span
-0,01
-0,02
-0,03
-0,04
600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
fo
Page 16 of 26 E 2720 K 01
se
6,00
5,80
lu
5,60
5,40
Output (ppm(v))
5,20
5,00 at 5% span
4,80
cia
4,60
4,40
4,20
4,00
0 50 100 150 200 250
er
Time (min)
m
Fig 10 Start-up drift C2H4 at 0% span
om
42,50
42,00
rC
41,50
Output (ppm(v))
41,00
at 45% span
40,50
fo
40,00
39,50
0 50 100 150 200 250
Time (min)
T
NO
Page 17 of 26 E 2720 K 01
4 MANUFACTURER'S DATA
se
Instrument specification and other details provided by the manufacturer
lu
80797 Mnchen
Germany
cia
Instrument Analyser for measurement of total hydrocarbon concentration in
proces gases
er
Serial No 40/08/00
Voltage 220 V
fo
Frequency 50 Hz
Page 18 of 26 E 2720 K 01
Zero/span gas consumption 2-3 l/min
se
Supply for heated sample line Regulated and controlled by thermocouple
lu
Dimensions (h x w x d) 220 x 440 x 350 mm
cia
er
m
om
rC
fo
T
NO
Page 19 of 26 E 2720 K 01
5 OPERATING PRINCIPLE AND CONSTRUCTION
se
5.1 Measuring principle
The gas concentration is converted into an electrical signal by means of a flame ionisation detector
(FID). In the FID, a hydrogen flame burns in hydrocarbon-free air, called combustion air.
lu
An electric field is applied between jet and cylinder electrode by means of polarisation voltage.
When the sample contains hydrocarbon molecules, they are heated in the flame and then cracked
and stripped causing CH fragments to form. These fragments are oxidized by the oxygen in the
+
combustion air and CHO ions form. The ion current can be measured and is proportional to the
quantity of carbon atoms of organic compounds.
cia
5.2 Mechanical construction
The flame ionization detector is proving to be an important tool for industry in the direct
measurement of hydrocarbon concentration. It permits accurate measurements of concentration
er
from a few parts per million (ppm) up to 100% and meets industrial requirements with regard to the
speed with which it is ready to use, ease of installation and the low level of sophistication in its
operation.
In contrast to familiar designs, the test specimen in the TESTA-FID-1 is sucked through the
m
detector. This provides the following advantages:
- All moving parts are located behind the ionization chamber in the cold zone and are thus no
longer exposed to the high temperature of the specimen gas.
- The path of the specimen from the measuring location to the burner nozzle contains no moving
om
variations in room temperature. The proof of this is an extremely constant zero and calibration
point.
- The FID-123 is fitted with an additional, heated specimen pump to eliminate measurement
errors caused by variations in specimen pressure in the range between 1.0 bar pressure and
0.3 bar vacuum.
fo
T
NO
Page 20 of 26 E 2720 K 01
6 TEST METHODS AND REFERENCES
se
6.1 Test methods
The test gases originated directly from compressed gas cylinders or were mixed from different gas
cylinders by using a gas mixer based on dilution by mass flow controllers. The accuracy of the mass flow
lu
controllers had been established by calibration with a Brooks volumeter with a ring of mercury.
The estimated uncertainties (of the test results) of the different tests were:
measured error : 0.2 %
conformity : 0.2 %
cia
repeatability : 0.6 %
dead band : 6%
drift : 11 %
sample pressure variation : 11 %
sample flow variation : 11 %
er
sample temperature variation : 11 %
cross sensitivity : 11 %
The basic test gas concentration was about 50 ppm(v) C2H4 in N2.
m
The uncertainty of the concentration of the gas used was 1 %.
The output data of the analyser was recorded with a megalog datalogger. In most tests, the signal
was measured with an average of 60 seconds.
om
Accuracy
An eleven point calibration (10% interval) with four runs at each point for up-scale readings and four runs
at each point for down-scale readings, was carried out by diluting the basic test gas. From this test,
average errors, conformity, hysteresis and repeatability were determined. At the start of the evaluation,
rC
the analyser was adjusted with calibration gas at about 50% span.
Dead band
The dead band was measured at lower and higher span values span by varying the concentration of the
test gas in steps of about 0.1 ppm(v) (= about 0.1 % span).
fo
The change in output was measured after a settling time of at least twice the response time.
Detection limit
T
The detection limit was calculated as three times the standard deviation of 30 recordings of the test gas
at 0% span.
NO
Page 21 of 26 E 2720 K 01
Mounting position
se
The effect on the output of tilting the analyser through angles of 10 in four mutually perpendicular
planes was measured at 0% and 50% span.
Shock
lu
The effect on the output was investigated by tilting the analyser about one bottom edge so that the
distance between the opposite edge and the test surface is 100 mm. Before and after a freely fall onto
the test surface the influence was measured at 0% and 50% span.
Vibration C2H4
cia
Initial resonance search
The analyser was vibrated over the frequency range of 10 to 60 Hz at 0.2g acceleration. The sweep rate
was 0.2 octave per minute. The peak to peak amplitude was 0,14 mm. Vibration was applied in three
directions (X,Y,Z). A resonance search was carried out.
er
Endurance conditioning
The instrument was subjected to vibration for 45 minutes in each axis at the largest resonance
frequencies.
m
Before and after the vibration tests measurements were carried out at 0% span and 50% span. Due to
safety conditions of the vibration test lab, it was not allowed to operate the analyser with H2 and
calibrationgas during vibration.
om
Start-up drift
The analyser was subjected to reference conditions for at least 24 h with the power supply switched off.
The output of the analyser was recorded during the first 4 hours. The test was repeated using a test gas
with a concentration of 0% span.
rC
Long-term drift
During 32 days the analyser was operated continuously with a test gas of 0% span. After 0, 1, 4, 6, 8,
11, 13, 15, 18, 20, 22, 26, 28 and 32 days, the output of the analyser was recorded with test gases of
0% and 50% span. The output was corrected for barometric and temperature influence.
fo
Step response
The analyser was subjected to a sudden change from test gas with a concentration of 0% span to test
gases of a concentration of 70% span. The output and corresponding time of the analyser was
T
recorded.
Over-range
NO
This test was carried out by measuring the changes in lower-range value and span which result from
over-ranging at the minimum and maximum span (1950 ppm(v) C2H4).
After the over-range has been applied for 1 minute, the input was reduced to the nominal lower
range-value. After a further 5 minutes had elapsed, the lower range-value and the span was
Page 22 of 26 E 2720 K 01
determined.
Sample pressure variation
se
The analyser was fed with test gases of 0% and 50% span at pressure levels varying between 800 to
1200 mbar (abs.) at a steady flow of 2 l/min. The pressure was measured with a calibrated pressure
transmitter. The influence of the sample pressure was calculated by linear regression.
lu
Sample temperature variation
The analyser was fed with test gases of 0% and 50% span at sample temperature varying between 25
to 250 C at constant pressure. The sample temperature were measured with a calibrated temperature
cia
transmitter.
The analyser was fed with test gases of 0% and 50% span at flow variations of 666 ml/min to 1232
ml/min. The flow was measured with a Bios DryCal flowmeter (graphite composite piston).
er
Interference tests
The output of the analyser was recorded after application, at test gas concentrations of 0% and 50%
m
span, of:
- 50 ppm(v) C2H4 in N2 (reference)
- 50 ppm(v) C2H4 in air
- 30 ppm(v) C4H10 in air
om
3
- 272 mg/m NO in N2 *
3
- 45 mg/m NO2 in N2 *
3
- 1216 mg/m SO2 in N2 *
3
- 229 mg/m NH3 in N2*
3
- 80 mg/m HCl in N2 *
3
- 47 g/m H2O in N2 *
3
- 133 g/m H2O in N2 *
fo
- 20,8 vol% O2 in N2 *
- 10,4 vol% O2 in N2 *
Page 23 of 26 E 2720 K 01
se
lu
analyser personal computer
T p
x x MC
cia
WG MF MF MF
MF : massflow controller
MC : mixing chamber
p : pressure transmitter
er
T : temperature transmitter
WG : watervapour generator
x : disconnected if not used m
Fig 12 Basic test arrangement
om
rC
Y
fo
front X
T
NO
Page 24 of 26 E 2720 K 01
6.2 References
se
IEC 770: 1984. Methods of evaluating the perfomance of transmitters for use in industrial-process
control systems
lu
August 1992
cia
Memorandum HEC-MEMO-950031, TNO Centre for Evaluation of Instrumentation and Security
Techniques (EIB), April 1995
6.3 Definitions
er
Reference operating conditions (IEC 902): The range of operating conditions within which the
influence on the device by the changes in environmental conditions are disregarded.
m
Gas analyser: An analytical instrument that provides an output signal which is a monotonic function of
the concentration, partial pressure or condensation temperature of one or more components of a gas
mixture.
om
Stable test gas mixture: A mixture of gases (and/or vapour) in which the component to be measured is
known and does not react with and is not adsorbed onto the containment system (e.g. cylinder).
The concentrations of gases and their inaccuracy shall be known for the components of the gas mixture
and commensurate with the criteria to be evaluated.
Zero gas: A gas mixture used to establish the zero point of a calibration curve when used with a given
rC
Calibration gas: A stable test gas mixture of known concentration used for periodic calibration of the
analyser and for various performance tests.
Range (IEC 770): The region between the limits within a quantity is measured; limits are given by stating
fo
Lower range value (IEC 770): The lowest value of the measured variable that a device is adjusted to
measure.
T
Upper range value (IEC 770): The highest value of the measured variable that a device is adjusted to
measure.
NO
Span (IEC 902): The algebraic difference between the upper and lower limit values of a given range.
Error (IEC 902): The algebraic difference between the measured value and the true value of the
Page 25 of 26 E 2720 K 01
measured variable.
se
Zero shift (IEC 902): The change of the output value, due to some influences, when the input variable is
at the lower range value.
Span change (IEC 902): The change in output span due to some influences.
lu
Average error: The arithmic mean of the errors at each point of measurement , for rising and falling
inputs separately.
Residual error: The algebraic difference between two output measurements at reference conditions,
cia
one before and one after an excursion from the reference condition.
Response time (T90): The time interval from the instant a step change occurs in the value of the
property to be measured to the instant when the change in the indicated value passes (and remains
beyond) 90% of its steady state amplitude difference, that is: T90 = T10 + Tr (or Tf).
er
Drift: The rate of change of error, stated over a specified time interval.
m
om
rC
fo
T
NO
Page 26 of 26 E 2720 K 01
se
APPENDIX I
lu
cia
er
m
om
rC
fo
T
NO
Page 1 of 3 E 2720 K 01
se
lu
cia
er
m
om
rC
fo
T
NO
Page 2 of 3 E 2720 K 01
se
lu
cia
er
m
om
rC
fo
T
NO
Page 3 of 3 E 2720 K 01
APPENDIX II
se
Manufacturers QA procedures and instrument status
lu
Company/adress: Kathi-Kobus-street 15
80797 Munich, Germany
cia
Parent company: --
er
Production premises: On 3 floors in above standing adress
Subsidiaries in Germany: --
m
Work force: 15 fix, 25 flexibel
QM-manual: Existing
Certification: No
80797 Munich
Germany
NO
Page 1 of 2 E 2720 K 01
Manufacturers QA procedures and instrument status
se
1 Quality Assurance
1.1 Has your company adopted a structured QA policy and if so, when was this fully
implemented?
lu
Yes, 1989
cia
DIN ISO 9001, not registered
er
No, only manufacture and installation
1.4 If your company is part of a corporate organisation, is your QA system subject to and
controlled by a corporate QA policy?
m
No
1.5 Does your QA system cover all activities and products in your manufacturing facility? If
om
Yes
1.6 How many times, and by whom, has your location or company been audited by an
external organisation during the last 3 years?
rC
Once by Siemens
Siemens Germany
fo
1.8 Are (corporate) products, if manufactured elsewhere in your organisation, also subject to
an identical QA system?
Yes
T
NO
Page 2 of 2 E 2720 K 01
se
APPENDIX III
2.1 Is the product evaluated being produced elsewhere in your organisation? If so, please state
lu
where. Are all/any parts of the product fully interchangeable regardless of origin?
cia
2.2 What is the expected lifetime of the product?
25-30 years.
er
2.3 What is the guarantee period for the hardware and software if applicable, of the product
evaluated?
24 months.
m
2.4 For how long after manufacture of the product ceases will you provide service/maintenance
facilities and spare parts?
om
20 years guaranteed.
2.5 In what language are product documentation, manuals etc. written? Are they available in English,
French and German?
Page 1 of 1 E 2720 K 01