Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Clarifier size:
= 1.843 ton/hour
f
Volume calculation, V =2( )
ton
1.843 X 2hr
=2 ( hr
3
)
0.876 ton/m
= 8.416m3
3
D
Assume V = 4
D3
8.416 m3=
4
D= 2.204 m
= 4(2.204m)
= 8.818m
Area = D D
= 2.204m 2.204m
= 4.858 m2
6.1.2 MIXING TANK
Tank size:
kg 1batch 1day
POME out = 6144915.475 batch x 20 days x 16.67 h
kg
= 18431.05879 h
Blending Time: 6h
f
Volume calculation, V =2( )
kg
18431.06 X 6 hr
hr
=2 ( )
kg
876.0 3
m
= 252.48026 m
252.48026 m
4 multiple unit = 4
=63.12 m
63.12 m=(D)/4
D= 4.32m
Based on assumption, L/D=1/4
L = 3D
= 3(4.32m)
= 12.96m
Area =2rh+2r
= 2 (2.16 m )(12.96m) +2(2.16m)
=189.46m
6.1.3 ANAEROBIC DIGESTER (FERMENTER)
16.67 hour
Volumetric flow rate (Q) = 2580.8645 m3/(20days x 1 day )
= 7.74 m3/hr.
3 3
H = 3D => 4 3D = 1500 m
D = 8.60 m.
1500 m3 = 4 (8.60 m)2H
H = 25.82 m.
Area (A) = 2r2 + rh
= 2(5.359 m)2 + (5.359 m)(32.149 m)
A = 464.97 m2.
6.1.4 CONDENSER
Based on the Tata McGraw- Hill, the heat flux can be find using the formula:
Btu
Range x GPM x 500 = Q ( hr )
= 31 K
= 30.9004 GPM
Hence,
Q = 31 K x 30.9004 x 500
0.29307107W
btu
= 478956.2 x Btu
hr 1( )
hr
= 140368.206 W
From the book of Heat and Mass transfer, McGraw-Hill education, the overall heat transfer
coefficient can be determined at table 11-1. In this table, it given the representative values of
the overall heat transfer coefficients in heat exchanger where the type of heat exchanger is
steam condenser. This is since the condenser is used to condense the vapor or moisture that
present in the biogas. Hence, the overall heat transfer coefficient for steam condenser heat
exchanger 1000 W/m2. K.
Q = U A (Tlm)
A= 9.8504 m2
6.1.5 GAS ENGINE
P 2 ( 1 )/
T2 = T1 P1 )
( (page 125)
1.41
1.0 atm
= 35.0 C ( 2.0 atm ) 1.4
= 28.7 C
[( ]
1.41
g . mol 1.4 J 1.0 atm
W = 4489.6449 s 1.41 (
8.314 )(
gmolK
( 308.15 K ))2.0 atm ) 1.4
1
= 33025.06 kJ/s
Clarifier size:
kg 1 batch 1 day 1 m
POME in = 3805036.628 batch x 20 day x 16.67 hours x 876 kg
m
= 217.182 hour
Volume calculation,
=20.36 m3
Area, height and diameter:
D3
Assume volume batch, V=
4
3 D3
84.1 m =
4
D= 2.96m
Based on assumption, L/D=1/4
L = 4D
= 4(4.750m)
= 11.84m
Area = 2rh + 2 r
= 2 ( 1.48m)(11.84m) + 2 (1.48m)
= 123.864 m
6.2 EQUIPMENT COSTING
6.2.1 IP CLARIFICATION
The bare cost for the clarification tank can be calculated based on Biegler et al, (1999)
systematic method of chemical process design
Cost Vertical vessel
L D
Bare cost = c ( L )( D ) (Table 4.11;
= 12,509.354 $ USD 4.40 MYR /1 $ USD (*Currency on 20th April 2017, 1 USD =
4.40 MYR)
55,041.157 MYR
558.4927
566.6
= 0.986
Updated bare module cost = UF ( BC )( MPF+ MF 1)
0.986(55,041.157 $ USD)(3.67+ 4.231)
374,467.012 $ USD x 4.40 MYR/1 $ USD
1,647,654.851 MYR
6.2.2 MIXING TANK
The bare cost for the mixing tank can be calculated based on Biegler et al, (1999) systematic
method of chemical process design
Cost Vertical vessel
L D
Bare cost = c ( L )( D ) (*Table 4.11; page 134)
0.81 1.05
42.42 7.09
= 1000 $ ( 4 ) ( ) 3
558.4927
= 566.6
= 0.986
Updated bare module cost = UF(BC)(MPF+MF-1)
The bare cost for the fermenter can be calculated based on Biegler et al, (1999) systematic
method of chemical process design.
Cost: Vertical vessel
L D
Bare cost = c ( L )( D ) (Table 4.11; page
134) = 1000$ (105.48 ft/ 4.0 ft)0.81 x (35.16 ft/ 3.0 ft)1.05
= 187703.86$ x 4.40MYR/1$ (*Currency on 20 th April 2017, 1 USD = 4.40
MYR)
= 825, 896.98 MYR.
= 46,109,209.19 MYR
6.2.4 CONDENSER
The bare cost for the condenser can be calculated based on Biegler et al, (1999) systematic
method of chemical process design. By using the Guthrie material and pressure factor the
formula use :
S
BC = C ( S )
The base cost for the equipment can be get from the table 4.12 where the area for the
condenser converted to ft2
10.769 ft 2
A = 11.970 m 2 2
1m
= 128.8515 ft2
128.8515
BC = $5000 ( 400 )0.65
= $ 2394.358
= MYR 10 535.18 (*Currency on 20th April 2017, 1 USD = 4.40 MYR)
Since the condenser use is 3 multiple units hence the bare cost, MYR 31 605.52
= 3.10
= 0.985
= 167,798.45 MYR
6.2.5 GAS TURBINE
The bare cost for the gas turbine can be calculated based on Biegler et al, (1999) systematic
method of chemical process design. By using the Guthrie material and pressure factor the
formula use :
S
BC = C ( S )
CEPCI 2017
Updating factor, UF= CEPCI 2015
= 558.4927/115.0
= 4.86
134)
0.81 1.05
38.84 9.7111
= 1000 $ ( 4 ) ( 3 )
= 21,642.23$ USD x 4.40 MYR/1$USD (*Currency on 20th April 2017, 1 USD =
4.40 MYR)
= 95,225. 83 MYR
Module factor, MF2 = 4.23 (Table 4.11; page 134)
Stainless steel, solid MPF = FmFp (Table 4.2; page 113)
= 3.67 x 1.0 = 3.67
CEPCI 2017
Updating factor, UF = CEPCI 2015
558.4927
= 566.6
= 0.986
Updated bare module cost = UF(BC)(MPF+MF-1)
= 0.986(21,642.23$ USD )(3.67+4.23-1)
= 147,240.75 $ USD x 4.40 MYR/ 1$ USD
= 647,859.29 MYR
6.3 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST
Cengel.Y.A and Ghajar A.J, (2015). Heat and Mass Transfer. McGraw-Hill Education. Fifth
edition.
Task Force of the Water Environment Federation. (2015). Clarifier Design. Aging (Vol. 7).
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703993104