Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract:
low rating in transits. Many politicians have proposed spending bill to address this issue,
however, the abilities of such a plan to create jobs has been disputed by many politicians. This
report examines the potential of three different perspectives on the American Infrastructure
problem, the Democrats, the Republicans, and Trumps, and look specifically at their ability to
create a significant number of engineering jobs. Through research and study, the Democrats
Methods:
So how can one determine which infrastructure plan is the best for producing engineering
jobs? This research report will be presented as follows. First, a way of determining a significant
number of engineering jobs will be determined. Secondly, background will be given on past
American infrastructure projects and their job creating capabilities, and also provide information
on the modern plans. Fourthly these plans will be compared to one another. Lastly, a conclusion
will be made about which plan is the best in producing engineering jobs.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2014, there were approximately two and a
Smith 2
quarter million engineering jobs in the United States. Although this may sound like a large
number, there are currently three hundred and twenty five million Americans according to the
U.S. Census. For the purposes of this paper, we will assume that a significant change in the
number of jobs is equivalent to having at least a one percent increase in engineering jobs. By
simple calculations, this would show that there would need to be at least twenty-two thousand
and four hundred new engineering jobs in order to have a significant impact.
Background
The first major infrastructure project of American history was the foundation of the
Civilian Conservation Corps. during the Great Depression. As stated in An Overview of the
Civilian Conservation Corps., the Civilian Conservation Corps. was founded in 1933 by
President Franklin D. Roosevelt because many Americans were without jobs due to the Great
Depression [134]. This organization would put these men to work on public projects such as
laying roads and constructing telephone lines [134]. While there are no distinct numbers which
state how many engineering jobs were created, CCCLegacy.org reports that there were
administrators working for the Civilian Conservation Corps. In this context, it is fair to say that
many of the supervisors and administrators are in fact engineers. For there to have been a
significant number of engineering jobs created, only slightly less than four percent of these jobs
Smith 3
would have had to have been engineers. Although one cannot know for sure, one can reasonably
say that a significant number of engineering jobs were created. Although the circumstances
surrounding this example are very different from our modern day and age, it does prove that the
government has the capacity to create a significant number of engineering jobs. However,
although it is possible, it is not necessarily plausible. The Civilian Conservation Corps. was
created specifically to create jobs. A modern infrastructure project would likely focus more on
If you fast forward thirty years, you arrive at the next large-scale American infrastructure
project, the public interstate system. In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the
Federal Aid Highway Act which authorized twenty-six billion dollars, or about two hundred and
thirty billion dollars in todays money, of public funds to be spent on creating a U.S. roadway
system, according to History.com. Like in the previous example, one cannot be precisely sure
about how many engineering jobs were created by Eisenhower, it is plausible to say that through
the he did create a significant number of jobs with the Federal Aid Highway Act. Over the
course of Eisenhowers presidency, he created approximately three million jobs. For him to have
jobs he created must have been engineering jobs. Although one cannot be entirely sure, it is
reasonable to believe that he created a significant number of engineering jobs using public funds.
Using data from past American history, it is reasonable to state that private funds can be used to
The most unique aspect of Donald Trumps infrastructure plan is that it utilizes both
public and private funds to restore American infrastructure. According to Forbes, Trump has
proposed one hundred and forty billion dollars in infrastructure spending. Approximately forty-
five percent of this investment will be placed in the railway system, and both roadways and
energy will receive fifteen percent of this budget apiece. However, Trumps infrastructure plan
does not stop there. According CNBC, Trumps infrastructure plan also will rely on private
funding, through tax cuts for companies that assist with the construction. Overall, estimates
show that, as Time Magazine calls it, Trumps public-private partnership plan should total
The Democrats plan involves solely public funding. According to The Washington Post,
their plan consists of spending approximately one trillion dollars to improve Americas
infrastructure. Fox News reports that about two hundred and ten billion of these dollars will go
to administering repairs on public roadways and bridges, and another one hundred and eighty
million dollars will be used to upgrade American bus and railway systems.
Lastly, the Republicans plan for infrastructure spending is that there should not be any.
They have two primary reasons for this position. First, according to The Washington Post,
Republicans are wary of any large scale spending because the United States has a national debt
of approximately twenty trillion dollars and do not wish greatly increase it. Secondly, they
believe that infrastructure spending creates little to no long-term economic growth, as reported
by Politico.
Smith 5
Comparison
Trumps plan does have many potential benefits and drawbacks to it. According to
Mason B. Williams of the The Atlantic, private infrastructure projects tend to be of better quality
than publicly funded ones, as private enterprises are eager to prove their superiority in managing
projects over the government. However, one of the major concerns that Cory Schouten of CBS
News voices is that of profit. Businesses tend to invest where there is profit to be made, which
means that projects that make good money will be the only ones undertaken, regardless of where
the actual needs lie. This also means that certain areas which are less profitable such as water
and sewage, will not receive as much of a private investment as highly profitable enterprises
The benefits of the Democrats plan are based upon the concerns over Trumps plan.
Unlike Trumps plan, which follows the profit, the Democrats plan would be able to repair the
infrastructure where it is most needed. However, this plans drawbacks directly stem from the
advantages of Donald Trumps plan. This plan would likely be of poorer quality and not last as
long.
The biggest benefit to the Republicans stance is that the government save billions of
dollars of government spending. However, this amazing upside comes with the enormous
Analysis
In the course of this paper, other, more modern studies will also be examined. The first
of these will be examined is a 2014 study conducted by Josh Bivens of the Economic Policy
Institute. This study uses three different scenarios to demonstrate job production: where thirty
billion dollars would be spent annually for the duration of a decade, where ninety-two billion
dollars would be spent annually for the duration of a decade, and where two hundred and fifty
billion dollars would be spent annually for the duration of six years. In the first scenario, after
factoring in dozens of factors, it is estimated that there will be approximately thirty-two thousand
jobs created which require a bachelors degree or higher. For a significant number of
engineering jobs to have been made, approximately seventy percent of these jobs would have to
be in engineering, which seems possible, but is not necessarily the case because there are people
with college degrees who manage the monetary side of these projects who are not engineers.
However, in the next scenario, only about thirteen percent of the jobs would need to be
engineering jobs, and in the last scenario only about five percent. From this evidence, it is
apparent that infrastructure has the ability to create a significant number of engineering jobs if
This last study will examine the ability of a private-public partnership creates more jobs.
According to Rachel Weber, private-public partnerships are very poor at creating jobs. She
argues that this is because there are mostly concerned with procuring profits for themselves and
do not like the lack of surety in the informal arrangements made by politicians [119].
Smith 7
Conclusion:
From this data, it is thereby possible to determine which plan would create the most
engineering jobs. Through the data both from American history and from modern infrastructure
engineering jobs, thereby ruling out the Republicans plan as the best option for engineering jobs.
This leaves the only two options as being Donald Trumps plan and the Democrats plan. Due to
the last piece of data which states that private-public partnerships creating few jobs, this would
remove Donald Trumps plan from the picture. The only way that Trumps plan could potentially
make a significant number of engineering jobs is if he could create a way to overcome businesses
reluctance to infrastructure projects. Until then, it appears that Democrats infrastructure plan
References:
https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/home.htm
B. Singman. (2017, January 25). Democrats pitch $1T infrastructure plan - will Trump get on
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/25/democrats-pitch-1t-infrastructure-plan-will-
trump-get-on-board.html
Smith 8
C. Schouten. (2016, November 29). A potential pothole in Trumps infrastructure plan (1st
infrastructure-plan-has-a-potential-pothole/
H. Warfield. (2017, January 31). 3 Charts That Show the Surprising Scope Of Trumps
http://www.forbes.com/sites/datadesign/2017/01/31/3-charts-that-show-the-surprising-
scope-of-trumps-infrastructure-plan/#60bf42fc1c52
J. Bivens. (2014, July 1). The Short- and Long-Term Impact of Infrastructure Investments on
Employment and Economic Activity in the U.S. Economy (1st Edition) [Online].
Available: http://www.epi.org/publication/impact-of-infrastructure-investments/
School Clearing House, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 134-138, November, 1935.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobs_created_during_U.S._presidential_terms
K. A. Wolfe and L. Gardner. (2016, November 11). Conservatives vs. Trumps infrastructure
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/conservatives-vs-trumps-infrastructure-plan-
231221
Smith 9
M. B. Williams. (2017, January 17). Would Trumps Infrastructure Plan Fix Americas Cities?
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/trump-infrastructure-cities/512432/
R. Webber. Why Local Economic Development Incentives Don't Create Jobs: The Role of
Winner, The Urban Lawyer. vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 97-119, 200.
Y. Mui. (2017, March 31). Breaking down Trumps $1 trillion infrastructure plan (1st Edition)