Professional Documents
Culture Documents
b. Performance Indicators
INDICATORS 2009 - 2010 2011 - 2011 2011 2012
1. Completion Rate 96% 64% 64%
2. Drop-out Rate 3% 0% 0%
3. Retention Rate 91% 91% 91%
4. Repetition Rate 3% 3% 3%
5. Promotion Rate 90% 90% 91%
6. Graduation Rate 100% 100% 100%
7. Failure Rate 8% 8% 8%
8. Cohort-Survival 53% 52% 55%
Rate
c. Intermediate Indicators
1. School Nutritional Status
Grade Severely Wasted Normal Overweight
Wasted
Grade I 10 23 31 1
Grade II 8 9 39 0
Grade III 6 9 22 0
Grade IV 9 12 23 0
Grade V 6 4 24 0
Grade VI 11 12 27 0
TOTAL 55 87 191 1
2. Textbook-Pupil Ratio
Grade 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
Grade I 1:2 1:2 1:2
Grade II 1:2 1:2 1:1
Grade III 1:2 1:2 1:1
Grade IV 1:2 1:2 1:2
Grade V 1:2 1:2 1:2
Grade VI 1:2 1:2 1:2
TOTAL 1:2 1:2 1:2
3. Teacher-Pupil Ratio
Grade 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
Grade I 1:28 1:26 1:25
Grade II 1:34 1:51 1:45
Grade III 1:56 1:38 1:45
Grade IV 1:38 1:52 1:34
Grade V 1:35 1:40 1:49
Grade VI 1:39 1:36 1:37
TOTAL 1:36 1:37 1:42
A. EQUITABLE ACCESS
1. Personal
P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1 HT-III HT-II HT-I TIC MT-2
M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B. Textbooks( Elementary)
GRADE
I II III IV V VI
Actu Need Actu Nee Actu Need Actu Nee Actu Nee Actu Nee
al s al ds al s al ds al ds al ds
English 40 29 119 0 73 0 35 9 35 0 32 18
Mathemati 38 10 51 0 63 0 61 23 61 0 7 43
cs
Science 42 0 28 21 28 18 63 0
Sibika/HKS 50 20 29 39 0 43 0 43 0 35 15
EPP 4 22 4 32 5 45
IA 0 44 0 36 0 50
MSEP 0 44 0 36 6 50
CE/sP 6 6 38 6 30 8 42a
3. Physical and Ancillary Facilities
a. ICT Facilities
1. Learner Performance
GRADE III
Grade VI
Subjects 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Intervention Done to
Raise Academic
Standards
English Reading ABRC, story
books
Mathematics Reinforcement Activities
Science Remedial Classes
Filipino Remedial Classes
Hekasi Reciting Multiplication
Table
Average
b. Periodic Test Result Use another Sheet for the result of and item analysis by subject area)
c. NCBTS/TSINA
2. Stakeholders Contribution/Assistance
STAKEHOLDERS NATURE OF CONTRIBUTION EXTENT OF INVOLMENT
P S VS O
h. Did the use of SBM grant for school project improve the SBM practice of the school? If
yes/no state why.
___________________________________________________________________________________.
English 2 1 1 1 1 1 2
Mathematics 2 2 3 1 1 1 2
Science 1 1
Sibika/HKS 1 1 1
Filipino 2 1
EPP
MSEP/MAPEH
MTBMLE 2
EsP
D. Research Conducted
Outco Hindering Factor/s for not
Research Title Conducted By me achieving
Expect Actual
ed
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
D. Others
1. Programs and Projects
Programs/Proj Target Restrict Year Status Outcome Reasons
ects EFA ed Started Why
Goals In SIP Expected
(Y/N) Outcome
Not
Achieved
Expecte Actual
d
Rehabilitation
of 2012
Electrical
Wiring
Water Supply
Connection 2012
Grass Cutting 2012
Repairing of
Principals
office ceiling 2012
Acquiring of
Office
Furniture 2012
(Sofa)
2. Best Practices/Awards
A. Reviewing of NAT
B. Peer-Teaching
C. Peer-Reading
D. MTAP Classes
Prepared by:
AL EUSEBIO L. JONSON
Head Teacher III
Noted:
LORETA S. ESGUERRA
District Supervisor