Role of UNO in maintaining international peace and

The United Nations was established in 1945 "to save succeeding generations from the scourge of
war" and one of its main purposes is to maintain international peace and security.
The Charter of the United Nations gives the Security Council primary responsibility for the
maintenance of international peace and security.
In fulfilling this responsibility, the Security Council may adopt a range of measures, including
the establishment of United Nations peacekeeping operations, whenever there is a threat to the
peace in a region.
The Council may also decide on sanctions, such as trade embargoes, to enforce its decisions. The
Council expresses its will in resolutions.
The different instruments of the UN's peace efforts come into play at different stages of conflict.
The boundaries however between conflict prevention, peacemaking, peacekeeping,
peacebuilding and peace enforcement have become increasingly blurred. Peace operations are
rarely limited to one type of activity.
Conflict Prevention and Peacemaking
The United Nations uses the political tools of diplomacy and mediation to help nations prevent
and resolve conflicts peacefully. United Nations envoys are dispatched to areas of tension around
the world to assist in defusing crises and brokering negotiated settlements to conflicts.
The UN Secretary-General may exercise his or her "good offices" to facilitate the resolution of
the conflict -- steps taken publicly and in private, drawing upon his independence, impartiality
and integrity, to prevent international disputes from arising, escalating or spreading.
Civilian-led political missions are deployed to the field with mandates to encourage dialogue and
cooperation within and between nations, or to promote reconciliation and democratic governance
in societies rebuilding after civil wars.
The work of the United Nations to foster credible elections around the world also contributes
directly to its efforts to promote peace and prevent conflict.
Underpinning the activities is the conviction that political issues lie at the root of many conflicts,
and thus political solutions are required to resolve them.
 Peacekeeping
UN peacekeeping operations used to be deployed to support the implementation of inter-state
ceasefires or peace agreements, such as the first peacekeeping mission, the United Nations Truce
Supervision Organization (UNTSO), set up in 1945 to monitor an Armistice Agreement between
Israel and its Arab neighbours, or the UN mission on the Golan Heights UNDOF). Today, they
are often also required to play an active role in intra-state peacemaking efforts and get involved
in peacebuilding activities (complex multidimensional peacekeeping including military, police
and civilian components, e.g. the UN mission in South Sudan UNMISS). These changes in the
role of UN peacekeeping have been reflected in the policy reform documents of the Department
of Peacekeeping Operations ( Brahimi Report, Capstone Doctrine, New Horizons)
Today's multidimensional peacekeeping operations facilitate the political process, protect
civilians, assist in thedisarmament, demobilization and reintegration of former combatants;
support the organization of elections, protect and promote human rights and assist in restoring
the rule of law.
UN Peacekeeping is guided by three basic principles:
Consent of the parties;
Impartiality;
Non-use of force except in self-defence and defence of the mandate.
UN peacekeeping operations may use force to defend themselves, their mandate, and civilians,
particularly in situations where the state is unable to provide security and maintain public order.
Peacebuilding
The experience of the past has also led the United Nations to focus as never before on
peacebuilding - efforts to reduce a country's risk of lapsing or relapsing into conflict by
strengthening national capacities for conflict management, and to lay the foundations for
sustainable peace and development.
Building lasting peace in war-torn societies is among the most daunting of challenges for global
peace and security. The United Nations established the Peacebuilding Commission in 2005 to
better anticipate and respond to the challenges of peacebuilding.

Disarmament
In 2010, world military expenditures exceeded some 1.5 trillion US dollars. The need for a
culture of peace and for significant arms reduction worldwide has never been greater. This
applies to all classes of weapons from nuclear weapons to conventional firearms and landmines.
Since the birth of the United Nations, the goals of multilateral disarmament and arms limitation
have been deemed central to the maintenance of international peace and security. These goals
range from reducing and eventually eliminating nuclear weapons, destroying chemical weapons
and strengthening the prohibition against biological weapons, to halting the proliferation of
landmines, small arms and light weapons.
These efforts are supported by a number of key UN instruments. The Treaty on the Non-
Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), the most universal of all multilateral disarmament
treaties, came into force in 1970. The Chemical Weapons Convention entered into force in 1997,
the Biological Weapons Convention in 1975. TheComprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty was
adopted in 1996, however it has not yet entered into force. The 1997 Mine-Ban Convention came
into force in 1999.
Women, peace and security
While women remain a minority of combatants and perpetrators of war, they increasingly suffer
the greatest harm. The UN Security Council recognized that including women and gender
perspectives in decision-making can strengthen prospects for sustainable peace with the
unanimous adoption of resolution 1325 on women, peace and security. The landmark resolution
specifically addresses the situation of women in armed conflict and calls for their participation at
all levels of decision-making on conflict resolution and peacebuilding.
Counter Terrorism
Countering the scourge of terrorism is in the interest of all nations and the issue has been on the
agenda of the United Nations for decades. Almost no week goes by without an act of terrorism
taking place somewhere in the world, indiscriminately affecting innocent people who just
happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Eighteen universal instruments (fourteen instruments and four amendments) against international
terrorism have been elaborated within the framework of the United Nations system relating to
specific terrorist activities.
A global strategy to counter terrorism was agreed in September 2006 which marks the first time
that all Member States of the United Nations have agreed to a common strategic and operational
framework to fight terrorism. The Strategy forms a basis for a concrete plan of action: to address
the conditions conducive to the spread of terrorism; to prevent and combat terrorism; to take
measures to build state capacity to fight terrorism; to strengthen the role of the United Nations in
combating terrorism; and to ensure the respect of human rights while countering terrorism.
Organized Crime
Transnational organized crime takes many forms from trafficking in drugs, firearms and even
people to money laundering and corruption. Today organized crime has diversified, gone global
and reached macro-economic proportions, so that it constitutes a threat to peace and security.
The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) is the guardian of the United Nations
Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (Organized Crime Convention) and the three
supplementary Protocols -on Trafficking in Persons, Smuggling of Migrants and Trafficking of
Firearms.
Security

By the very act of joining the UN, all members "confer on the Security Council primary
responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security and agree that in carrying
out its duties under this responsibility the Security Council acts on their behalf" (italics added).
They also consent "to accept and carry out" the decisions of the council on any peacekeeping
action that may be required. Under Article 39 of the charter, the Security Council's powers to
take such enforceable decisions come into effect only when a definite "threat to the peace," an
actual "breach of the peace," or a particular "act of aggression" has occurred. Only if the council
decides that one of these circumstances prevails may it invoke its power to take a course of
enforcement action that constitutes a legally binding commitment on all UN members. With
regard to disputes between states that, in the opinion of the council, have not yet led to a definite
threat to the peace or do not constitute an actual breach of the peace or an act of aggression, it
may simply recommend measures for a peaceful settlement.

The extreme caution with which the founders of the UN assigned governmental prerogatives to
the Security Council is reflected in the fact that its peacekeeping powers are set out in two quite
separate chapters of the charter. Chapter VI establishes the council's advisory functions in
assisting the peaceful settlement of disputes. Chapter VII defines the kind of action that it may
take in the event of threats to the peace, breaches of the peace, and acts of aggression.
Peaceful Settlement of Disputes

Under Chapter VI of the charter, the parties to any dispute "the continuance of which is likely to
endanger the maintenance of international peace and security" are enjoined to seek a settlement
of their own accord by peaceful means, including "negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation,
arbitration, judicial settlement, or resort to regional agencies or arrangements."When can the
Security Council itself intervene? On this point, the charter is as unrestrictive as possible. By no
means does every "situation" of conflicting interests lead to an actual dispute. Yet the council
need not wait until a situation has given rise to friction before taking action. It may take the
initiative of investigating any dispute, or any situation that might lead to international friction or
give rise to a dispute, in order to determine whether the continuance of the dispute or situation is
likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security. Moreover, any nation,
whether a member of the UN or not, has the right to bring any dispute or threatening situation
before the Security Council (or before the General Assembly). Should the parties to a dispute fail
to settle their differences by peaceful means of their own choice, they are bound under the terms
of the charter to refer the problem to the council.

Once the council has decided to intervene in a dispute, it can take several courses of action. It
may recommend one of the methods of settlement listed in the charter; it may itself determine
and recommend other "procedures or methods of adjustment" that it deems appropriate; or, if it
considers that the continuance of the dispute is likely to endanger international peace and
security, it can decide to recommend substantive terms of settlement.

Threats to the Peace, Breaches of the Peace, and Acts of Aggression

If, in its opinion, there is a threat to the peace, the Security Council has the duty to maintain
peace and security by preventing the outbreak of actual hostilities. If there has been a breach of
the peace or an act of aggression, its duty is to restore international peace and security.

The Security Council is empowered by the charter to call upon the parties to comply with any
provisional measures that it deems necessary or desirable. Such immediate instructions to the
quarreling states are intended, without prejudice to the rights of the parties, to prevent an
aggravation of the conflict. For example, the council may demand the immediate cessation of
hostilities and withdrawal of the forces from the invaded territory. If either or both parties do not
comply with these demands, the council "shall duly take account" of the failure to comply. In this
event, the farthest-reaching prerogative of the Security Council can come into playnamely, its
right to institute sanctions against the recalcitrant state or states.

Here again, the discretion of the Security Council is very wide. When the council finds that a
threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression exists, it is authorized, though not
compelled, by the charter to invoke sanctions. Even if its first provisional demands are not
heeded, it may continue to press for peaceful settlement or take various other actions, such as the
dispatch of a commission of inquiry, short of sanctions. On the other hand, the Security Council
is free to invoke whatever enforcement measures it may consider necessary under the
circumstances. It need not begin with the mildest but may, as in the Korean conflict, immediately
start with the severest type of sanctionnamely, the use of military forceif it considers that
less drastic measures would be inadequate.

Types of Sanctions. The charter does not provide an exhaustive list of sanctions that the Security
Council may invoke, but it mentions two types: sanctions not involving the use of armed forces,
and military sanctions.

Sanctions not involving the use of armed forces may be of two kinds. One is the severance of
diplomatic relations with one or more of the belligerent states. The other is economic sanctions,
including partial or complete interruption of economic relations and communications, such as
rail, sea, and air traffic, postal and telegraphic services, and radio. The purpose is to isolate the
country or countries against which they are directed, physically, economically, and morally. For
example, a would-be aggressor that is denied certain strategic materials may be compelled to
cease hostilities. If successful, such measures have great advantages over military sanctions.
They impose fewer burdens on the participating countries and fewer hardships on the population
of the areas of conflict. They also avoid the danger that once military action on behalf of the UN
has been taken, war may spread.

Military sanctions, the charter stipulates, may include demonstrations by air, sea, or land forces;
blockade; or "other operations by air, sea, and land forces," the latter including actual military
action against the offending country or countries.
Once the Security Council has decided on specific sanctions, all members of the UN are under
legal obligation to carry them out. The council may, however, at its discretion, decide that only
certain member states shall take an active part, or it may demand that even nonmember states
participate in economic sanctions to make them effective. The charter also stipulates that before
any member state not represented on the Security Council is called upon to provide armed forces,
that country must, upon its request, be invited to participate in the council's deliberations, with a
right to vote on the employment of its own contingents.

The Security Council has invoked its powers to impose sanctions judiciously.

In December 1966, the council imposed mandatory economic sanctions against the illegal Smith
regime in Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe).

The council instituted a voluntary arms embargo against South Africa in 1963 on the grounds
that arms supplied to that country were being used to enforce its policy of apartheid. In
November 1977, it imposed a mandatory arms embargo against South Africa. Although the
General Assembly requested the Security Council to consider mandatory economic sanctions (in
1977) and a mandatory embargo on oil and oil products (in 1979), the council did not act. (The
General Assembly passed a resolution calling for a mandatory oil embargo and economic
sanctions against South Africa at its 44th session in 1989.)

On 6 August 1990, in response to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, the Security Council, in its
Resolution 661, imposed tight sanctions: a full trade embargo barring all imports from and
exports to Iraq, excepting only medical supplies and humanitarian food aid. The Security Council
further indicated its resolve by passing Resolution 665 on 25 August 1990, authorizing member
states to use force to block shipments of goods to Iraq. Finally, on 25 September, it passed
Resolution 670 mandating a complete air transport blockade of Iraq.

In 1991, at the request of the foreign minister of Yugoslavia, the Security Council imposed its
first mandatory arms embargo in Europe in an effort to quell the rising tide of insurrection
between ethnic groups in that country. By 30 May 1992, Yugoslavia had dissolved into four
states: Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia
and Montenegro). At that time, Slovenia, Croatia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina were admitted to UN
membership. The Security Council, in Resolution 757, imposed mandatory trade sanctions
against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, excepting only shipments of food and medicine for
humanitarian purposes.

On 31 March 1992, the Security Council adopted an arms and air traffic embargo on Libya
(Resolution 748) in response to requests by France, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
Those countries sought to force Libya to extradite two Libyan nationals indicted in those
countries for the 21 December 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, in
which 270 persons died, and the bombing of UTA Flight 772 on 19 September 1989 in Niger, in
which 171 persons died. On 11 November 1993, the Security Council voted to widen those
sanctions (Resolution 883) to include freezing Libyan bank accounts, closing the offices
of Libyan Arab Airlines, and prohibiting the supply of materials for construction and
maintenance of airports. The sanctions also banned the supply of pumps, turbines, and motors
used at export terminals and oil refineries.

On 16 June 1993, the Security Council adopted wide-ranging economic and trade sanctions
(Resolution 841) against the military regime in Haiti which had unseated Haitian president Jean-
Bertrand Aristide in 1991. President Aristide had been elected to office in a UN-supervised
election. The council acted in conjunction with similar sanctions imposed by the Organization of
American States. In brief, the Security Council directed members not to sell oil, weapons,
ammunition, military vehicles, military equipment, and spare parts to Haiti. In addition, it
authorized members to blockade the country to prevent those items from being delivered to
Haiti. It also authorized member countries to freeze Haitian funds. The sanctions were briefly
lifted when negotiations produced the Governors Island agreement of 3 July 1993, in which the
military regime agreed to restore President Aristide with the assistance of a UN peacekeeping
mission (called the UN Mission in Haiti or UNMIH). On 11 October 1993 the first deployment
of UNMIH was prevented from landing at Port au Prince and the sanctions were reinstated three
days later. On 6 May 1994, the Security Council adopted an expansion of sanctions (Resolution
917) against Haiti. Multinational forces were peacefully deployed in Haiti on 19 September
1994, and President Aristide returned shortly thereafter. On 29 September 1994, the Security
Council suspended the sanctions (Resolution 944).

On 30 May 1993, in its Resolution 918, the Security Council imposed an arms embargo on
Rwanda. It imposed the embargo in an effort to protect its UN Assistance Mission for Rwanda
(UNAMIR) and other international humanitarian relief workers, as well as the civilian
population, from the rampant lawlessness and violence that had broken out in connection with
the resumption of that country's civil war between ethnic Hutu and Tutsi factions. In May 1994,
violence broke out between the factions, and killings were widespread. In July 1994, the Security
Council established a commission of experts to investigate violations of international
humanitarian law (Resolution 935), and an International Tribunal was established on 8
November 1994 (Resolution 955) to prosecute persons responsible for the genocide.

On 8 October 1997, in its Resolution 1132, the Security Council imposed a petroleum and arms
embargo on Sierra Leone. It did this following the military coup of 25 May 1997 led by the army
in conjunction with the Revolutionary United Front (RUF), to address the violence and loss of
life that surrounded the coup, and to demand the military junta relinquish power, restore the
democratically elected government, and return to constitutional order. In June 1998, the Security
Council established the United Nations Observer Mission in Sierra Leone (UNOMSIL), after the
democratically elected president, Alhaji Dr. Ahmed Tejan Kabbah, was returned to power in
March of that year. Fighting continued, however, and the Security Council established the United
Nations Mission in Sierra Leone (UNAMSIL) on 22 October 1999, a new and larger mission
with a maximum of 6000 military personnel. In 2000 and 2001, the numbers of military
personnel involved in the mission increased to 11,100 and 17,500 respectively. In order to stop
the flow of rough diamonds from Sierra Leone other than those controlled by the government,
the Security Council passed Resolution 1306 on 5 July 2000, extended by Resolution 1385 on 19
December 2001. This action was undertaken due to the link between the diamond trade and
human rights abuses, in particular in the case of the RUF, which committed killings,
amputations, abductions, and torture of civilians.

On 31 March 1998, the Security Council placed an arms embargo on the Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia (Resolution 1160), to resolve the crisis in Kosovo, between Serbian forces and ethnic
Albanian Kosovars. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) launched air strikes against
Serbian targets beginning on 24 March 1999, and lasting until 10 June of that year, to stop the
practice of ethnic cleansing of the Albanian Kosovars by the Serbs. On 10 June, the Security
Council established an international civil and security presence in Kosovo (Resolution 1244). In
October 2000, Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic was voted out of office. On 10 September
2001, the Security Council terminated the prohibitions preventing the sale of arms and related
material to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, by adopting Resolution 1367.

On 15 October 1999, the Security Council imposed a limited air embargo and funds and financial
assets embargo on the Taliban regime in Afghanistan (Resolution 1267). With Resolution 1333
passed on 19 December 2000, it placed an air and arms embargo on the country, placed restricted
travel sanctions on it, and froze funds of Osama bin Laden and his associates in Afghanistan.
Following the defeat of the Taliban by the US-led coaltion in November 2001, the Security
Council lifted restrictions imposed upon Ariana Afghan Airlines (Resolution 1388) on 15
January 2002. And on 16 January (Resolution 1390), the Security Council modified its sanctions
on the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and Osama bin Laden, holding that all states should freeze the
economic resources of these this individual, organization, and former regime, prevent their entry
into or transit throught their territories, and prevent the supply, sale, and transfer of arms and
related material to them.

In response to the war between Ethiopia and Eritrea that began in 1998 as a border dispute in the
region around Badme claimed by both countries, the Security Council on 17 May 2000 placed an
arms embargo on the two countries, and established a sanctions committee to address the
situation (Resolution 1298). Once there was a cessation of hostilities in June 2000, the Security
Council established the UN Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea (UNMEE), sending 4,200 military
personnel to monitor the ceasefire and assist in ensuring observance of security commitments.

With Resolution 1343, the Security Council on 7 March 2001 applied an arms embargo on
Liberia, blocked Liberian diamond sales, and restricted international travel by top Liberian
officials, in response to fighting between the Liberian government and armed insurgents, which
began in the remote northern Lofa County in 1998 and intensified during 2000. The sanctions
were applied due to international condemnation of Liberian President Charles Taylor's trafficking
in illicit diamonds from mines in Sierra Leone, for destabilizing neighboring countries, and for
widespread human rights abuses against local populations. With Resolution 1408 on 6 May
2002, the Security Council extended the sanctions on Liberia for another 12 months and
established a panel of experts to address the situation.

The Security Council's previous reluctance to invoke its ultimate prerogatives is attributable to
two main factors. There is a very strong argument that in most cases punitive measures are
ineffective and may even harm chances for a peaceful settlement. The provisions on the UN
security system make it clear that peace is to be preserved whenever possible without recourse to
force. The second major factor is that, before the end of the cold war, one or two of the
permanent members would take different positions from the other three or four, so that in most
cases the council's sympathies were divided between the opposing parties. Not only did division
between the permanent members preclude punitive measures against one side, but it also
seriously inhibited definitive action of any kind. For example, the initial action of sending a UN
command into Korea was made possible only by the absence of the USSR from the council at the
time (in protest against the council's decision on Chinese representation). Had the Soviet Union
been there, it would presumably have vetoed the necessary resolutions. An example of the
reverse situation is the issue of South Africa's apartheid policies. Beginning in 1960, the African
nations appealed regularly to the Security Council to institute mandatory economic sanctions
against South Africa in the hope of forcing it to terminate the apartheid system. The former
USSR frequently expressed itself in favor of such a move, but the Western permanent members
in particular, South Africa's major trading partners, the United Kingdom and the United States
were reluctant to impose economic sanctions.

In the post-cold war era of collegiality in the Security Council, the Russian Federation and the
United States rarely found themselves on opposite poles of an argument, and imposing sanctions
as a method to force other member states to comply with Security Council directives was much
easier to accomplish.

Armed Forces for the UN

Although the charter contains provisions to equip the Security Council with armed forces in case
of need (the Covenant of the League of Nations contained no such provisions), these
requirements have not been implemented. Under the charter, all UN members "undertake to
make available to the Security Council, on its call and in accordance with a special agreement or
agreements, armed forces, assistance, and facilities, including rights of passage, necessary for the
purpose of maintaining international peace and security." These agreements were to determine
the number and types of military forces to be provided by the nations, their degree of readiness,
their location, and so on, and they were to come into effect only after ratification by the countries
concerned according to their respective constitutional requirements. (With this provision in mind,
the United States Congress in December 1945 passed the "UN Participation Act," authorizing the
president of the United States to negotiate a special agreement with the Security Council on the
detailed provision of United States forces; the agreement would then require approval by
legislative enactment or joint resolution of the United States Congress.) The troops and weapons
would remain part of each country's national military establishment. They would not become
international forces, but they would be pledged to the UN and, at the request of the Security
Council, would be placed at its disposal.

However, the plan to place armed forces at the disposition of the Security Council required wide
international agreement on a number of steps before it could be put into operation. The charter
provides for the establishment of a Military Staff Committee composed of the chiefs of staff (or
their representatives) of the five permanent members to advise and assist the council on all
questions relating to its military requirements. The first task that the council assigned the
Military Staff Committee was to recommend the military arrangements to be negotiated with
member states. The committee was never able to reach agreed positions that could serve as the
basis for negotiation and at an early date took on the characteristics of a vestigial organ.

Peacekeeping

Peacekeeping operations are not mentioned in the charter, yet they, as opposed to enforcement
measures, are the means that the Security Council has most frequently used to maintain the
peace. It has dispatched observer missions and troops in several crises. (The council's major
peacekeeping operations and those under-taken by the General Assembly are described in the
chapter on International Peace and Security.) Although the arrangements for the provision of
armed forces foreseen in the charter have not been realized, the UN has nevertheless been able to
establish peacekeeping forces on the basis of voluntary contributions of troops by member states.

Until the end of the cold war, the formula had always been that the disputants themselves must
expressly invite the council to take peacekeeping measures (the special situation of Korea being
the only exceptionsee the chapter on International Peace and Security.) With the eruption of
ethnic and nationalistic conflicts in Eastern Europe and Africa after the end of the cold war, the
Security Council recognized that the increasing number and complexity of peacekeeping
operations warranted review. In May 1993, it requested the Secretary-General to submit a report
containing specific new proposals to improve the capacity of the UN in peacekeeping. The
Secretary-General submitted his report on "Improving the capacity of the United Nations for
peacekeeping" in March 1994. In response to this analysis, on 3 May 1994, the Security Council
issued a statement setting forth factors to be considered in establishing UN peacekeeping
operations. The factors to be considered in the establishment of new peacekeeping operations
included:

whether a situation exists that presents a threat to international peace and security;

whether regional or subregional organizations already exist and can assist in resolving the
situation;

whether a cease-fire exists and whether the parties have committed themselves to a peace
process intended to reach a political settlement;

whether a clear political goal exists and whether it can be reflected in the mandate;

whether a precise mandate for a United Nations operation can be formulated; and

whether the safety and security of UN personnel can be reasonably insured; in particular,
whether the parties to a dispute offer reasonable guarantees of safety to UN personnel.

The council also required an estimate of projected costs for the initial 90 days of a new
peacekeeping operation, and for its first six months, and an estimate of the total annual cost,
before authorizing any new missions. In the case of mission extensions, it also required estimates
of the financial implications.

In both "An Agenda for Peace" (1992) and his March 1994 report, the Secretary-General
proposed that a new mechanism had to be developed to enable a quick response to international
crises. Under normal circumstances, the process of designing a mission, obtaining commitments
for troops and equipment, establishing a budget, and obtaining approval for new peacekeeping
missions could take as long as three months. The Security Council welcomed the Secretary-
General's proposal to devise stand-by arrangements under which member states would maintain
an agreed number of troops and equipment ready for quick deployment. A Stand-by
Arrangements Management Unit was established to keep track of units and resources available
for this purpose.