Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Growing up with a father whos a divorce mediator, I always wondered how children
of divorce are affected, both immediately and in their eventual marriages. Because of my fathers
involvement with divorce, Ive often thought about family friends who are divorced and how its
dealt with. Through the lens of generation change and time difference, I wanted to explore
divorces affects on children, its affects on inner-family relationships, the change in divorce
culture over the past half - century, and how children of divorce can be helped in not repeating
In order to answer these questions, I conducted a case study involving two children of
the same divorce (Margaret and Gary) and a grandchild (Irving) of that same divorce. Margaret,
a tall, bubbly, now forty-year-old mother of five, was eight years old when her parents got
divorced. Margarets baby brother Gary, a funny now thirty-three-year old father of four, was
just one year old when the divorce happened. Their nephew Irving, an aspiring therapist, is now
a twenty-five year-old father of one and was not alive yet at the time of his grandparents
divorce. I asked each of the participants the same questions about how they were affected, how it
affected their intimate relationships, how they dealt with it, their thoughts and feelings on the
change in divorce culture, and what children of divorce can do to not repeat the patterns of their
parents relationship - because as weve learned statistically, being a child of divorce increases
the risk of your own divorce (Lecture Slides Divorce Risk Who Fights October 6). As a
volunteer divorce mediator who works tirelessly to help both spouses expedite the process as
smoothly as possible with as minimal damage done to their children as possible, my father is
able to offer a unique insight on divorce. Being that he is the only one with the chance to see
2
both sides of the coin without being biased and without an ulterior motive, he serves to provide
On the impact level, I hypothesized that since Margaret was a little girl at the time of
the divorce, she would be most affected to the point where its hard for her to have healthy
relationships until today. Gary, on the other hand, was just a baby, so since he didnt witness
fighting in the house, I figured it wouldnt be so impactful on his life today and minimally as a
kid. For Irving, I was just looking for a younger perspective that can tell the story through his
relatives eyes, so I assumed a divorce from two generations back didnt affect him at all. I was
almost certain theyd all say that the divorce culture today is better than thirty years ago and in
helping children of divorce not repeat their parents patterns; I guessed therapy to be the primary
response. I asked them and myself the question of how one divorce thirty years ago could affect
these people today? More importantly, what can be done to not allow it to affect them
negatively?
Although Margaret believes that Gary was the most affected, after speaking to each of
them, it became clear to me that she actually was. When Margarets parents got divorced, she
was eight years old, which is, a very bad age for this because youre old enough to feel hurt but
too young to understand, as she put it. Following the divorce, her and her siblings lived with
their mom who had primary physical custody, and saw their dad once a week, which as weve
learned from a US Census study, is most common (a staggering eighty-two percent) for children
of divorce to live with their mom, as opposed to their dad (Lecture Slides Getting Divorced
2002 US Census October 14). The once a week outings with her dad brought back terrible
memories for Margaret. Although much later on, her parents relationship would be categorized
as friendship, at this time it was one of preoccupation, which as we learned, is the most
3
detrimental of the three kinds of post-divorce relationships for adjustment (Lecture Slides
Getting Divorced October 9). Because her father missed his ex-wife and wanted her back, she
recalls, My father would use me. He would say to little innocent eight year old girl me, tell
mommy you miss me. Tell her you miss daddy. She was the one he would burden with
complaints because her older sister Susan (age 14) was too smart and Gary (age 1) was a baby so
While dating to get married, Margaret was very cautious to not marry anyone who
resembled her father, even in the slightest way. One guy had hands like my father and I couldnt
take it. I told him I wanted to go home! she exclaimed, as she chuckled. Although shes able to
look back and laugh at herself, her dating life (age 18-22) was no laughing matter. While most of
her friends were married by eighteen or nineteen, which surprised me too, she didnt get married
until she was twenty-two! I was like an old maid! she exclaimed. For years, it seems like she
was fulfilling a self-fulfilling prophecy of not wanting to find the right one because she never
gave anyone a chance past one date. It was my therapist who told me, one date isnt enough.
You need an appetizer, main, and dessert. 3 dates! As an old lady, at age twenty-two, Margaret
finally met the man she would spend the rest of her life with, but that didnt mean her
psychological post-divorce problems were solved. We dated for three months before getting
engaged, which scared me because thats how long my parents dated for, she remembered, this
time without a smile on her face, although she admits that her mother knew it wasnt right from
their honeymoon and felt he didnt love her but tried to stick it out while Margaret felt like her
husband was right for her, just nervous about it. In her parents case, there seemed to be a high
level of conflict where bad went to worse after having a child start to grow up, as in the Belsky
& Hsieh graph which claims a thirty eight percent bad-to-worse rate measuring husband love
4
(Lecture Slides Divorce Risk Who Fights October 4). Mid-interview, it seemed like she was
getting flashbacks to her nervous feelings before marriage, so she quickly fast-forwarded her life
to now, the good times. She is, however, relieved that shes been married for eighteen years,
already outlasting her parents marriage by a year. Despite feeling better now, she admits to
being on edge about her marriage, as she remarked, Im always waiting for the other shoe to
drop. Although her marriage seems healthy and her husband sounds delightful, shes constantly
afraid the marriage will go awry. My hypothesis here was accurate in assuming the divorce
While Margaret feels the long-term affects until today, her younger brother Gary
sounds like he was able to move on easier after the divorce. Gary claims to not be affected today
because he didnt actually witness the fighting, but admits that the road to get to where he is
today was not silky smooth. He nonchalantly commented on his relationship with his father, I
wasnt so tight with him, but Margaret told me that its tough for him to express his feelings of
resentment towards his father who was an absentee parent in his life. Similar to Margaret, one
major roadblock for Gary was choosing the right girl to marry. To a lesser extreme than
Margaret, Gary had a genetic fear, as he calls it, that he would end up divorcing the woman
hed marry because he felt like, a product of this (divorce) can produce that (divorce), as
evidently he is reluctant to even say the word divorce, which is interesting to note. We learned
marriage, but Gary didnt want it to be so acceptable in his own marriage, although he was afraid
that subconsciously, it would be (Lecture Slides Divorce Risk Who Fights October 4). One
conversation put his fears to rest and changed his entire life. He recalled his mother reassuring
him at age twenty-one, youre not your father. Theres nothing to worry about. After that, he
5
realized, You dont have to be the same person (as his father). Everybodys themselves.
Today, this child of post-divorce, as he calls himself, asserts that he is a better father because
he worked so hard to not be like his old man and learned from his mother. I figured Gary would
be a little more affected, but then again he didnt seem too deep, so maybe there was more he
was hiding.
Whereas Margaret and Gary were affected psychologically, each to his or her own
degree, Irving (the eldest daughter Susans son), who is a grandchild of divorce, was affected in
a more practical sense and offers a different perspective, being further removed. Unlike his uncle
and aunt, Irving saw things differently and felt sorry for his grandfather because he was lonely
most of his life. Because he saw his grandfather later in life as a sickly little old man, as
opposed to an absent father, he felt worse for him than his aunt and uncle. This newly married
twenty-five year old aspiring therapist was always torn as to where he and his wife should spend
holiday meals, because his family would normally go to his grandmother, but he felt bad for his
lonely grandfather who ate alone. They ended up switching off. He is positive that his
grandparents divorce had no psychological bearing on him (though I believe his interest in
mental health may have something to do with the divorce), besides for his relationship with his
mother (Susan) who he resented because he felt she didnt spend enough time with her father
when he was ill. Any substantial effects wouldve surprised me here because hes a generation
removed, so an effect on his relationship with his mother, in addition to a practical impact, was
Besides for the divorce affecting Irvings relationship with his mother, it also directly
affected other relationships, such as that of the children of the divorce amongst themselves,
which is common, in my experience, for the divorce to change the dynamics amongst the
6
children, my dad commented. The ongoing fight between Margaret and Susan began
immediately after the divorce when, despite them both living with their mother, they each picked
sides. Because Susan saw her father as sweet and innocent, she favored him while Margaret who
felt closer to her mother, sided with her. Over the years, as they started to see each others
perspectives, this sisterly battle calmed and turned into an unbreakable bond, as Margaret put
it. She said that after all is said and done, they are closer because of the divorce. After all, its
the single most influential experience in each of their lives, and they got through it together. In
addition to the divorce strengthening the sisterly love, Gary commented, I dont think our
family would be this close if not for it (the divorce). How ironic. While the divorce affected
these relationships directly and positively (at least in the long term), it negatively impacted the
Susan (the eldest daughter) and Albert (her old boyfriend) loved each other and were
ready to get married, but Alberts family wouldnt allow him to marry a girl whos parents are
divorced because divorce was a social stigma. Their family was looked at negatively simply
because their parents were divorced. Like many other traditional communities at the time, in the
Sephardic Syrian Jewish community of Brooklyn, divorce was rare and shunned upon. I was the
only girl I knew whose parents were divorced and it was looked at as a failure, Margaret
recalled. In retrospect, they probably wouldve gotten divorced much earlier had they been
going through it today, she added. What changed from then until now and is it better or worse
today?
Margaret, Gary, Irving, and my father have each thoughtfully examined the change in
the divorce culture in this community over the past thirty years and have each, surprisingly,
given the same answer when asked which time they think is better. Up until recently, women
7
were seen as disobedient or troubled if they didnt stick though thick and thin, but today, it is
acknowledged that the husband doesnt dictate their role as an individual, Irving explained. As
a society, we moved towards a more tolerant way of being. We are more sensitized towards
mental health, he added. As the world became more tolerant, so did this community. Without
the social stigma and divorce being easier, more people are getting divorced. Its become more
convenient as weve learned, Barriers have fallen as individualism has risen, both factors
which Irving danced around, but didnt pinpoint (Lecture Slides Divorce Risk Who Fights
October 4).
Unlike Irving, Gary had a different take on the change in divorce culture, as he
commented, Hollywood makes you think that marriage is going to be rosy with fireworks in the
background after every kiss and reality is so far from that. Via the Internet and social media,
this concept is so in your face, that when people realize their own marriage is far from that, they
want out. My father summed up their argument by stating, Today, people are more open, we
have more education, and there is more warranted divorce. However, there is more unwarranted
divorce due to the disposable culture we live in. Everythings disposable, including a spouse for
some people. The notion of disposable spouses is only made possible because there are so
many alternatives, statistically leading to a higher divorce rate, especially in a central city like
New York with so many options (Lecture Slides Divorce Risk Who Fights October 4). They
all agreed that theres too much unwarranted divorce today, too little warranted divorce thirty
years ago, and that a balance would be ideal. Although I understood their point, this surprised me
because I thought theyd say today is better because of the heightened awareness of, increased
education of, and increased tolerance of divorce. Practically speaking, with the aforementioned
8
advancements we have today, how can we help children of divorce not continue the patterns of
The first step in ensuring children of divorce dont repeat their parents behaviors,
according to Irving, is awareness. He explains that because, we tend to repeat early behavior in
positive relationship with his mother, Gary probably wouldve had a tougher time trying not to
repeat his parents mistakes as he asserted, I learned how to be a dad from my mom and from
watching her dynamic relationships with each of us (him and his sisters), I was able to learn the
characteristics of positive relationships and that its not always like my parents (relationship).
Margaret summed it up in recounting that the family would have fallen apart but My mother
was able to catch us and hold us together. Early positive relationships are essential, especially
for children of divorce. In my fathers experience with divorced couples, children who only see
negative relationships at a young age are doomed to repeat it. The divorce hero, as one
community member calls him, affirms, it is vital to expose children who have only seen bad
thus far to good and healthy (relationships) so that they dont grow up with that perspective. I
expected to hear therapy as the primary answer, but the varied answers were more on the side of
awareness and positive exposure. Maybe they figured therapy was a given.
In conclusion, we learned that Margaret, as expected, was the most affected by the
divorce; then Gary who was moderately affected which was surprising because even though hes
a child of post-divorce, he still grew up without a father, under circumstances of divorce; then
Irving, a grandchild of divorce, who really shocked me to be almost as affected as Gary claims to
be, both practically in splitting time between his grandmother and grandfather (like a child
9
splitting time between his parents) and in his relationship with his mother. We saw that ironically
enough, the divorce eventually strengthened their family, which is amazing. We learned that
divorce was shunned upon in this community so their family was labeled negatively, effecting
Susan most in that she couldnt marry a guy she loved because his family wouldnt allow it. We
analyzed the change in the divorce culture for better (warranted divorces) and for worse
(unwarranted divorces) and heard from the participants who agreed that a balance in the divorce
culture of now and thirty years ago would be ideal, which although I understood, I felt didnt
fully give the advancements and tolerance today enough recognition. Awareness (Irving) and
positive exposure (my father) were the top two answers on the board for helping children of
divorce not learn from their parents relationships, surprisingly not therapy.
Having the opportunity (and excuse) to explore a family who was at one point
traumatized from an event, then bounce back to be able to discuss an emotional story, and assess
themselves and other family members in an analytic and reflective fashion was an unbelievable
experience. Via zoning in on one family, I was able to obtain various perspectives on the same
story, each told though their experiences and their selective memory. This particular story alone
is insightful enough to be studied on its own as a case study, delving into the participants