You are on page 1of 4

Philippines Anti-Human Trafficking Legal

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT

BRANCH ____

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES FOR: QUALIFIED TRAFFICKING IN


PERSONS

-versus- [Sec. 6 (a) and (c) in rel. to Secs. 4(a), 3


and

10 (c) of RA 9208 and to Sec. 5(a) of


RA 8369]

(Family Courts)

ANTONIO CRUZ y SANTOS

(Brgy. Prinza, Teresa, Rizal)

JOSE LIM y CINCO

(Brgy. Prinza, Teresa, Rizal)

CARLOS TIROL y PARDO

(No. 4, Bonifacio St., Tondo, Manila)

Accused.

xx
INFORMATION

The Undersigned Assistant City Prosecutor accuses ANTONIO CRUZ y SANTOS, JOSE LIM y
CINCO and CARLOS TIROL y PARDO of the crime of Qualified Trafficking in Persons penalized
under Section 6 (a) and (c) in relation to Sections 4 (a), 3 and 10 (a) and (c) of RA 9208 and in
further relation to Section 5 (a) of RA 8369 (Family Courts), committed as follows:

That on or about the 3rd of June 2004 in the Municipality of Binangonan, Province of Rizal, the above
named accused ANTONIO CRUZ y SANTOS, JOSE LIM y CINCO and CARLOS TIROL y PARDO, in
conspiracy with one another, and by means of force, threats and coercion, and for the purpose of
exploitation, such as prostitution and other forms of sexual exploitation, but under the pretext of
domestic employment, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and knowingly RECRUIT ROSA
SANTOS, and thereafter did then and there willfully, unlawfully and knowingly, TRANSPORT and
TRANSFER her to a house belonging to or managed by accused CARLOS TIROL y PARDO located in
Tondo, Manila, which is within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court. And in pursuit of the
aforesaid conspiracy, said accused CARLOS TIROL y PARDO, did then and there willfully,
unlawfully and knowingly RECEIVE, HARBOR and EMPLOY said ROSA SANTOS as a prostitute in
said house, to her damage and prejudice.

That the crime was attended by the qualified circumstances of minority, complainant ROSA
SANTOS, being 16 years of age, and that the crime was committed by a syndicate of three (3)
persons.

CONTRARY TO LAW.

SOURCE: Inter-Agency Council Against Trafficking in Persons. Manual on Law Enforcement and
Prosecution of Trafficking in Persons Cases. Box 8, Sample Information, at p. 100. Manila 2009.

Republic of the Philippines


REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
10th Judicial RegionBranch 69Cagayan de Oro City
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
CRIM CASE NO.082082
NPS NO.-6IE-0480

0037

-VERSUS-

FOR: ESTAFA THRU


FALSIFICATION OF DOCUMENT

ACIPAG J. AGRU
/ACCUSED

INFORMATION
The undersigned Associate Prosecution Attorney II accuses ApipaG. Guro of the
crime of Estafa thru Falsification of Public Document,defined and penalized
under Article 315, paragraph 2, in relation toA r t i c l e 1 7 2 a n d Ar t i c l e 4 8 o f
t h e R e v i s e d P e n a l C o d e , c o m m i t t e d a s follows:

That on October 31, 2007 in the City of Cagayan de Oro,


P h i l i p p i n e s , a n d w i t h i n t h e j u r i s d i c t i o n o f t h e H o n o r a b l e C o u r t , accuse
d Apipa G. Guro [hereinafter Accused] misrepresentingherself to be Doa
Aiqa Macarambon-Bacsarpa, applied for a loanwith South Bank in the amount of PhP
5,000,000.00. A parcel of land located at Balulang, Cagayan de Oro City, covered by
Certificate of Title No. T-178439, in the name of Don Mario Bacsarpa married toDoa
Aiqa Macarambon-Bacsarpa was then offered by the accusedas collateral. The accused
did then and there wilfully, unlawfully, and
feloniously falsify the deed of real estate mortgage and
t h e promissory note corresponding to the said loan by forging their
signatures when in truth and in fact they did not so participate, to the damage and
prejudice of the complaining bank and the Spouses Bacsarpas in the a foresaid sum
of Php 5,000,000.00
.Contrary to law.

Cagayan de Oro City, July 19, 2010

AZRIFA A. MAMUTUK
Associate ProsecutionAttoryney IIApproved:
JOANNE N. VELEZ
City Prosecutor
BAILBOND REOCMMENDED: PHP 100,000.00

WITNESSES:
Vincy Jane A. Polinar
c/o South Bank, Kausawagan, Cagayande Oro City2 . A n d o t h e r s .

CERTIFICATION

This is to certify that as shown by the records the undersigned, an authorized


officer, that there is a reasonable ground to believe thata crime has
been committed and that the accused is probably guiltyt h e r e o f ; t h a t t h e
accused was informed of the complaint and of
thee v i d e n c e s u b m i t t e d a g a i n s t h e r a n d w a s g i v e n a n o p p o r t u n i
t y t o submit controverting evidence.

AZRIFA A. MAMUTUK
Associate ProsecutionAttorney II

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN


to before me this July 19, 2010 inthe City of Cagayan de Oro, Philippines