Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Background
Since 2005, the purchasing power of many Pakistani families has been
eroded by high inflation and the increasing cost of food and oil. BISP arose
against this backdrop as a means to address reductions in purchasing
power. Along with the economic development aims of the program, BISP
also seeks to empower women by presenting cash transfers directly to
female members of households.
BISP is currently the largest aid program in Pakistan and the government's
third largest budgetary allocation. BISP spending accounts for .3% of
Pakistan's GDP.
Program Structure
The Benazir Income Support Programme has been implemented in the
provinces of Punjab, Sindh, Baluchistan, and Khyber-Pakhtonnkhwa. The
program also operates in the federally administered regions of Azad
Jammu and Kashmir, and the Islamabad Capital Territory.
2
recommendation. Each Parliamentarian received 8,000 forms to distribute
throughout his or her constituency. Selected individuals underwent an
eligibility verification process through the National Database and
Registration Authority. A final list of eligible families was generated and
sent to the postal service. Funds were disbursed from the Treasury directly
to the postal service and then delivered to the female head of eligible
households.
BISP also provides cash payments for emergency relief efforts. These
payments are similar to the payments received by low-income families but
are distributed to families affected by terrorism, war, and natural disasters
such as earthquakes.
Eligibility
To be eligible for cash payments under BISP, families must earn less than
RS 6,000 per month; equivalent to $67. Further eligibility requirements
stipulate that:
3
An individual applicant must be a widowed or divorced female
without male family members
Targeting
4
vulnerable people in the country. The task of identification of the
potential beneficiaries of BISP was, therefore, entrusted to the
Parliamentarians, in what was termed as the Phase-I of Targeting.
Application Forms were distributed among the Parliamentarians in
equal number (8000 forms to each member of the National
Assembly and Senate and 1000 forms to each member of the
Provincial Assemblies), irrespective of party affiliation. The forms
received were verified through NADRA database. Out of the total
4.2 million received forms, 2.2 million families were found eligible
for cash transfers. Under this system of targeting, an amount of
Rs. 26.6 billion was disbursed to a total of 1.76 million eligible
families in 2008-09 @Rs.1000/- per family.
5
is around 85 percent. Area wise coverage statistics show that
14.88 million household covered in Punjab, 6.6 million in Sindh,
3.6 million in KPK and 1.1 million in Baluchistan. In AJK around
0.58 million, in GB 0.15 million and in FATA 0.40 million are
covered. Highest coverage was in GB followed by AJK, Sindh and
Punjab.
Populati Populati
No. of HHs Estimated on on Eligible
District Covered Populatio Covered Covered Familie
Province s (M) n (M) (M) (%) s (M)
Baluchist
an 30 1.10 7.62 6.05 79.40 0.45
6
Bolsa Familia, Mexico Prospera (former Oportunidades), and
Philippines 4P.
The area wise figures show that 2.057 million beneficiaries are in
Punjab, followed by 1.940 million in Sindh, 1.157 million in KP and
0.24 million in Balochistan, respectively.
7
Source: BISP Dashboard
Benefits
Eligible families receive cash payments of RS 1,500 monthly. This amount
increases the purchasing power for families earning approximately RS
5,000 each month by 20%. Most low-income families spend 5070% of
total income on food alone. According to BISP, the cash payment of RS
3,000 every two months, or RS 1,500 each month, will allow a family of 5
6 to purchase 2025 days worth of flour.
Criticism
Since the program's inception, critics have pointed out several overall
flaws in the Benazir Income Support Program design. Some claim that the
amount of RS 3000 bi-monthly, or RS 1,500 per month, is not enough to
move impoverished families above the poverty line as this would require
RS 2,550 per month. Another major flaw with BISP is its lack of
conditionality. Conditional cash transfer programs in Latin America have
experienced greater degrees of success because recipient families must
meet certain requirements before receiving a cash payment. These
programs build human capital through requiring recipients to enroll their
children in primary education, participate in health and nutrition seminars,
and visit health care providers. Apart from the Waseela-e-Taleem initiative,
cash payments do not require recipients to meet particular obligations in
return for cash payments.
8
There have also been accusations of corruption and political favouritism.
By some estimates, only 5060 percent of beneficiaries actually receive
cash payments from BISP. The previous method of identifying families
through the recommendation of Parliamentarians was flawed. Many have
claimed that Parliamentarians simply recommended their own family and
friends to receive cash payments. It has been pointed out that there is a
disproportionate number of families receiving BISP aid in geographic areas
where the ruling Pakistan People's Party dominates. For example, in the
Prime Minister's hometown of Multan, there is twice the number of people
receiving BISP payments than in Lahore, the opposition party's stronghold.
Punjab, another area where opposition parties dominate, has the lowest
ratio of eligible families1,974 for every 100,000 people; versus 6,829
families for every 100,000 people in Sindh, the ruling party's stronghold.
Beneficiaries have also complained that the postal service charges an
additional RS 100 to RS 200 for each delivery of payment.
Other critics have argued that as the Benazir Income Support Programme
makes up a substantial portion of the Pakistani government's budget,
impact evaluations should be conducted to evaluate the benefits and
actual need for the program.
9
been disbursed through Pakistan Post. BISP has gradually shifted
beneficiaries from Pakistan Post to other technically sounders modes of
payment.
Table: Year Wise Cash Transfer to BISP Beneficiaries through Post Office
Phase-1 Phase-II
No of Amount No of Amount
Beneficiari Disbursed Beneficiari Disbursed
es (Rs. Million) es (RS. Million)
10
Source: Payment Wing
Amount Disbursed
No of Beneficiaries (RS. Million)
Total 12896.46
11
Mobile Banking Payment Mechanism
Amount
No of Disbursed (RS.
Beneficiaries Million)
12
Total 10021.8
Amount Disbursed
No of Beneficiaries (RS. Million)
13
Total 256692.1
1. Mostly are being illiterate beneficiaries dont know how to use the
card.
2. Frequent complaints of card loss/damaged
PIN code lost
1. Middlemen involvement in card usage under the garb of facilitation
to the beneficiary whereby commission is charged by the middlemen.
14
Smart card and mobile phone to BVS till June 2017 starting from
September 2016. The proposed model would have following strengths:
15
planned to be handled 100% by partner banks ensuring BVS withdrawal
in the areas of their respective jurisdiction.
19. d) Conversion of existing POS to BVS: The existing partner
banks will convert all POSs on biometric withdrawal; a complete road
map with the banks is being finalized so as to complete switch over to
BVS by June 2017. During negotiation with the banks for extension in
contracts for next term of one year, the banks would be under
obligation to meet the shortfall of agreed point of sales (POS) and
ensure 100% biometric enabled POS for withdrawal by end of current
FY. 2016-17. Moreover State Bank has also issued instructions to all
financial institutions to ensure biometric based withdrawal by 30th
June, 2017. All BDC operations are expected to shift to BVS by June
2017. 70% of BISP payments will be done biometrically by Dec, 2017.
20. e) Monitoring mechanism: In order to mitigate beneficiarys
grievances comprehensive monitoring mechanism is being devised to
monitor and supervise operational activities at POS level to ensure
grievance redressal of the beneficiaries. Under SBP regulations the
partner Banks are under obligation to put in place a robust agents
oversight mechanism and submit monthly report on such complaints
against agents which includes punitive actions i.e. blacklisting and
termination of their contracts. In collaboration with partner banks a
joint monitoring mechanism will be put in place to enhance oversight
on performance of agent network to mitigate grievances of the
beneficiaries.
21. g) Performance indicators: BISP has defined certain performance
indicators with timelines for the partner banks to fulfill performance
milestones i.e establishment of new POS where required, conversion of
existing BDC, mobile phone and post office operations to BVS,
complaints against payment agents (POS), payment related grievances
of beneficiaries etc. In case of non-compliance to achieve the defined
service delivery milestones, penalty levels against each indicator have
also been defined.
16
example, marked reduction in service charges is done. Service charges
have been reduced from 4% to 2.75% in Smart Card and Mobile cases
while from 3.1% to 2.75% charges have been reduced in case of BDC.
17
significantly by creating strong deterrence for any financial
mismanagement. Cases related to the possible banks role in corruption
and fraud are also sent to FIA Cyber Crime wing after preliminary
investigations as these are very complicated in nature and require
expertise that BISP does not have. A proposal has been developed by the
M&E wing for establishment of Vigilance Cell at BISP to monitor and
preempt fraudulent practices through softwares generated alerts. This is a
very sophisticated data analysis tool which generates reports on daily
basis and will help in effective monitoring of Banks and Field operations
alike. Field Operations have also initiated number of in house inquiries to
strengthen the slogan of Say NO TO CORRUPTION.
Impact Evaluation
Keeping in view the importance of impact evaluation, the Government
of Pakistan has contracted Oxford Policy Management (OPM) to
undertake a rigorous evaluation of the programmes impact. Following
are the key findings of the first follow-up report conducted by OPM:
Primary Impact
18
BISP is having an impact on increasing consumption expenditure
and reducing poverty for households within the relevant RD treatment
sub-sample. The evaluation indicates that per adult equivalent monthly
consumption expenditure has induced a net increase for the RD
treatment sub-sample of Rs. 318. Overall BISP causes a 22% point
reduction in poverty for the RD treatment group
BISP has induced a fall in the depth of poverty. It was found that
BISP has reduced the poverty gap by 6 percentage points for the RD
treatment group. This means that BISP has led to an improvement in
the welfare of beneficiary households such that they are not only less
likely to be under the poverty line, but also that those who remain in
poverty are closer to the poverty line.
BISP has reduced rates of malnutrition amongst girls (aged 0-59
months) as measured by wasting, a measure of short-term
malnutrition.
64% of female beneficiaries report that they retain control over the
cash transfer, in terms of how the transfer is spent. This result appears
to hold regardless of whether the beneficiary actually collects the
transfer herself.
Secondary Impact
BISP has caused a change in the livelihood strategies adopted in
beneficiary households. BISP has decreased the proportion of working
aged men engaged in casual labour but increased the proportion of
men who are self-employed. This indicates that BISP may be supporting
the adoption of less vulnerable livelihood strategies.
BISP reduces the proportion of boys who engage in child labour.
BISP is associated with an increase in the reported expenditure on
health, increasing per adult equivalent health expenditure by around
Rs. 50.
BISP has induced an increase in the propensity to save amongst
beneficiary households in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The payment
mechanism also presents an (untapped) potential to improve the
financial access of beneficiary households.
19