Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EKAPUTRA SANANTO
MANAGEMENT 2013
UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA
INDONESIA
1
Statement of Authorship
We who undersigned in the following confirm that the work presented in this
paper,
This work has not been submitted and/or presented for any other event uunless
otherwise stated. All sentences or passages quoted in this paper from other
peoples work have been specifically acknowledged by clear-cross
clear cross referencing to
author, work, and page(s).
2
Abstract
Automation articulates the ever-expanding horizon of technological
change. Industrial relations emerge out of the employments generated through this
change. Both automation and employment have an organic relationship; each
influences the other. The technological advancements have changed the existing
methods of production, structures of organizations, and pattern of relationship,
which create a better, faster, and more efficient way of producing goods and
services. However, some argue that the production of more goods and service
with fewer inputs will produce long-term unemployment which will later be
discussed further in this paper. This paper consists of five parts. The first part
outlines the automation and its advantages and limitations. The second paragraph
outlines the effect from the technological advancement to employment. The third
paragraph further analyses the true relationship between technological
advancement in the unemployment rate. The fourth and the fifth paragraph give
both conclusion and some solutions to face the problems from human-machine
tradeoff; by using Universal Basic Income.
I. INTRODUCTION
In the early 1970s, the world started running out of new ideas in how to
produce, and this lead to the age of slower technological process in economy. But,
in the middle of 1990s, economic growth took off, mostly in the English-speaking
countries such as United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, because of
advances in computer information and technology including the Internet. And
today, technological advancement is one of the most beneficial on movements of
the 21st century. Technological advancement means some change allowing the
production of more goods and services. Any better, faster, or more efficient way
of producing is a technological advancement. Technology advancement allowed
for the growth and economic expansion of many individuals. However, there is a
renewed concern that technological advancement may displace much of the
manufacturing (or any other) workforce, and this will lead to the widespread
unemployment, social disruption, and human hardship. Such a fear is the natural
3
reflex of the man who sees a machine replacing him in his work. Conservative
economic thinkers tend to describe persons who fear the rapid advances of
technology as a Luddites; although this term may seem inaccurate. The terms
Luddites actually refers to uneducated workers who destroyed textile machinery
and other symbols of advancing technology in early 1800s. But nowadays, those
who concerned about technological advancement are quite well educated people
and therefore they are not Luddites. Some of them just expressed what they saw as
technological advancements undesirable distributional effect across income
groups.
4
II. THOERITICAL FRAMEWORK
Overall Impact
5
bank tellers, and telephone operators, are replacing human with robots that
perform the required tasks at a cheaper and more efficient rate.
More than 10,000 front office jobs have been cut across the top ten banks
since 2011. The job cuts are resulted from the replacement of human by
computers, and this trend looks set to continue. This could lead us to eventually no
longer need humans for manual labor and add more focus to more complex or
creative occupations, such as engineer, programmers, doctors, or architects. By
removing workers and decreasing required salaries, this creates more profit for the
company while the unskilled workers are left without a job.
One of the basic principle of economic is that wants are unlimited. This
given facts assures that people in the future will still be fully employed to the
extent they choose to be, even if there is a headlong rush to automate and
mechanize industry in this decade and beyond. For example, the Detroit
manufacturing that was severely impacted by the financial crisis. There was about
160.000 unemployed in Detroit that was believed to never go back to making
automobiles partly because automation has taken their jobs. Interestingly,
300.000 new jobs was created instead. These are the proof that any potential
6
unemployment problem, then, is not inherent in technological advancement,
which is beneficial in the long run. They may be short-run problems when
resource markets are less than perfectly competitive, but markets will eventually
adjust to eliminate any involuntary unemployment resulting from technological
advancement.
Therefore, all we need is the right policy to spread the benefits of increased
production efficiency to the society, instead hold back the innovation. The
Japanese cases have shown that if we hold back technology, cunsomers will have
to pay the price through unecessary artificial trade barriers fall or labor restrictions
are reduced.
IV. CONCLUSION
Each country around the globe have experienced their own history of
transition from one main economic main sources to another. United States has
seen long history of transition from agriculture in their early independence,
manufacturing era that started from industrial revolution, and finally reaching
their peak of service economy that supported by their vast innovation and
entrepreneurial human resources. China has their own history, but with a bit
different detail from United States due to their Communism background that still
prevailing until today.
7
This phenomenon is very quickly impacted lives in Indonesia, even only
ten years in the start of 21st century. The development of research organization
and education make the development of technology is getting faster than ever
before. With this pace of development, we are facing jobs and human resources
problem in a very quick tempo and intensity. The real example, especially in
Indonesia is the disappearance of the highway payment officer that gradually
getting replaced by machine, through e-toll card. Although currently they only
existed in small part of the gateway, it is only matter of time and resources that all
of this kind of jobs will be extinc. The other example is bank teller, and other
clerical functions that we usually seen in bank branches. Simple jobs like taxi
drivers also facing an apparent threat by the development of driver-less car, that is
just a matter of regulation, will be appear in a large scale on our streets. And there
are abundant jobs that are also threaten by machines, such as secretaries, farm
workers, typist, etc. Machines are getting better in a quicker time. And what
humans seem more helpless againts machine, is that they are self-learning. This
means that highly intellectual jobs also threatened by this phenomenon.
8
V. SOLUTIONS
9
more willing to quit jobs, take several courses and shift to other jobs in a short
term period. The Basic Income system also believed to increase entrepreneurial
skills and innovation between human resources, because they are not pressured
anymore to get a living. Innovation and creativity is vital in the future jobs market
that relying on services and entertainment. These features is one thing that
currently not owned by robots, nor being developed quickly in the coming years.
Just like any other ideas, this idea also have counter-arguments. Many
people believe that Basic Income will make people more lazy and decrease their
willingness to enter the jobs market. This is also shown by several experiments
around the world that this initiative is preventing people from doing jobs. As a
result, the price of very low-end goods and services will raise. Human laziness
also related to other implication that feared by the conservatives, such as
immigration and population boom. Immigration would increased if this initiative
only implimented by several countries. While population boom would occured if
Basic Income also given to childen, which give incentives to people to have more
children. The other arguments is about the financing. It is believed that Basic
Income is a very expensive to finance and many doubt that even rich countries
economic system will actually afford to absorb such progressive taxes.
Beside the unconditional Basic Income, that helps labor force to cope with
technological transition in the short run. There are several supporting policies to
make the increased production efficiency can be enjoyed by all parts of society.
First, to support Basic Income main goal, to allow labor forces to quit jobs and
improve their competence and skills, governments have to improve and provide
better courses and non-formal education. The non-formal education has to be
designated to people that previously doing clerical jobs such as driver, cashier, or
bank tellers. They have to be improved in a short time, so they have managerial,
entrepreneurial, and other non-clerical skills. Second, a country must have
adequate infrastructure, particularly internet. Because internet is the main
infrastructure that can make new jobs in the future that rely mainly on
entretainment. Such jobs already appear in large scale today in the form of
vloggers, internet entrepreneurs, video editors, and software developer. Last,
countries must strive to improve their bureaucracy to make establishing businesses
10
easier. Because, since basic income can improve innovation and
entrepreneurialism, it would be nothing if not supported by fast bureaucracy.
11
VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Mabry, R.H. and Sharplin, A.D. (1986). Does More Technology Create
Unemployment? . Cato Institute Policy. No. 68
Van Parijs, Philippe. (1992). Basic Income Capitalism. Ethics, Vol. 102, No. 3.
The University of Chicago Press.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/29770341?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40724409
http://www.jstor.org/stable/29770450
12
http://www.businessinsider.co.id/wall-street-trading-headcount-coalition-2016-
9/?r=US&IR=T#zd8Azczm3GxVB90a.97
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381835
http://www.jstor.org/stable/29770343
13