Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How Statistics
Revolutionized Science
in the
Twentieth Century
19
clockwork universe
Newtons laws of
motionBoyles laws of gases
40
19
Emperor NapolonPierre
Simon Laplace
19
19 40
error function
19
determinism
1
2
19
paradigm
20
correlation
oddsrisk
randomnessprobabilitystatistics
unpredictability
Talmud
probability distribution 2
Aristotle
17 18
BernoullisFermat
de MoivrePascalgames of
chance
statistics distribution
1971
Lancet
25% 4
10%
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Chapter 01 The Lady Tasting Tea
Chapter 02 The Skew Distribution
Chapter 03 That Dear Mr. Gosset
Chapter 04 Raking Over the Muck Heap
Chapter 05 Studies in Crop Variation
Chapter 06 The Hundred-Year Flood
Chapter 07 Fisher Triumphant
Chapter 08 The Dose That Kills
Chapter 09 The Bell-Shaped Curve
Chapter 10 Testing the Goodness of Fit
Chapter 11 Hypothesis Testing
Chapter 12 The Confidence Trick
Chapter 13 The Bayesian Heresy
Chapter 14 The Mozart of Mathematics
Chapter 15 The Worms-Eye View
Chapter 16 Doing Away With Parameters
Chapter 17 When Part is Better than the Whole
Chapter 18 Does Smoking Cause Cancer
Chapter 19 If You Want the Best Person
Chapter 20 Just A Plain Texas Farm Boy
Chapter 21 A Genius in the Family
Chapter 22 The Pieasso of Statistics
Chapter 23 Dealing with Contamination
Chapter 24 The Man Who Remade Industry
Chapter 25 Advice From the Lady in Black
Chapter 26 The March of the Martingales
Chapter 27 The Intent to Treat
Chapter 28 The Computer Turns Upon Itself
Chapter 29 The Idol With Feet of Clay
1
20 20
20 60
Hugh Smith
HH. Fairfield Smith
Groton,
Ronald Aylmer Fisher
1935
The Design of Experiments
2
50%
10
9
20
16
William Harvey
19
Albert Michelson
19
Gregor Mendel
10 20 40
19 20
20
90
90
1921
(the Annals of Applied Biology)
20
90
confounded
90 20
0 100
treatments,
controls
2
19
17 Johannes Kepler
Laplace
19 90
KKarl PearsonCharles
Darwin
K
19
20 60 K
19 70 K
Karl Marx
Carl Karl
K
19 80
The Grammar of Science
100
21
K
Francis Galton
Galton
Marks
biometrical
laboratory
regression to the mean
5 7
coefficient of correlation
20
K
gg
g
18 19
1820
Kskew
distribution
parameters
almost measurements
K
1. the mean
K
20 30 K
Jerzy NeymanK
K
1934
1897
20
K RRerhael Weldon
K
For
instance is no proof
K
K
Biometrika
25
1910
1921 Julia
Bell
1908
student
t
K
1911
K
20 K
K
K
Oliver
CromwellK
2
K
K
On Jewish Genlile Relationships
the
National Socialists
Nazis
Jewish race
Aryan race
Westminster Abbey
K
K
K
goodness of fit test
10 K EEqon Pearson
20
K E
20
18
PlymouthDartmouth
DNA
DNA
19
K 20
21
3
Guinness Brewing
Company 20
1899
William Sealy Gosset 23
the Danish
telephone company
1904
Poisson
3
distribution K
1 4
3
S 1819 SD
100
K
K1906
K
K
30
1937
Harold
Hotelling 20 30
61 Majory
t
The Probable Error
of the Meam1908
Monte Carlo
techniques,
small sample
K 4
10 20
K
Stratton
4
K
K K
Frederick Mosteller
John Tukey
4
t
4
4 4 4
4
Sz
zt
t 1967
Stanford University
Bradley Efron
hypothesis tests
significance tests
K
K
1912
5
1908
K
t
Gonville and
Caius College 22
K
20 3
K
K
K
K
K
4
1919 29
6
Robert Ball
6
Harrow Public School
Public Schools
1909 1912
iterative formulas
statistical mechanics
quantum theory 1913
K
KK
K
K
K
phenotypes
20
DNA
7
Johann
19 60
Willian Bateson
20 20 30
1925
Statistical Methods for
Research Workers
14
3
13
George
Harald Cramr
1945
Mathematical
Methods of Statistics
20 70
Yale University LJSavage
20 70
1919
Transaction
K
Rothamsted Agricultural
Experimental StationJohn Russell
Super-Phosphate
90
1000
90
53
Studies in
Crop Variation. . The Influence of Rainfall on the
Yield of Wheat at Rothamted
1921 11
variation
variance
1907
1909
K
Harpenden
1950 John Wiley
6
1923
1924 1929
20
123 7.
1 185
15 4
8 12
regression
Broadbalk
1876
1880 1894
1901
1876
1894 1901
1876
1876 the
Education Act
1880
1894
John
Lawes
1901
1923
fertility gradient
ananlysis of variance
analysis of covariance
1922
K
K
1924
degrees of freedom
TLT. L. Kelley
K
1924
the Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society of London
53
1 1924
34
5
Frank
Yates
K
1947 BBC
10
Leonard
Henry Caleb Tippett
LHC 1902
Imperial College1923
LHC
Shirley Institute
1924
the Galton Biometrical Laboratory
K
K
K
17 18
Questions of the Day and of the Fray
Soapy Sam
Bishop
Wiberforce
1860
THT. H. Huxley
K
K
extreme values
K
75
USACE
Statistics of Extremes
20 20 30
8
Brown Shirts
1922 Four Years
8
of Political Murder
1933
Richard Vin
Mises
1940
9
1966 Leo Baeck
Institute
8
J
The
and Exile
20
7
The Royal Statistical Society
1934 12 18
20 20
M.S.
1934
F.R.S.
The
Logic of Inductive Inference
MM. Greenwood
16
ALA. L. Bowley
K 3
K
E
E 10
E
K
K
K
20 30
70
K
K
K
finite
subset
statistic
estimator
median
consistency
(unbiasedness):
efficiency
bias
biased
27 intent to treat
maximum likelihood
estimator, MLE
MLE
regularity conditions
MLE
MLE
MLE
10
likelihood function
MLE
MLE
MLE
MLE
20
MLE
1966
MLE
10
20 50 CRC. R. Rao
MLE
Rao-Blackwell
theorem
iterative
algorithms MLE
David Smith 1923
History of Mathematics
14 Athenian drachma
Venetian ducat 127
60
Nan Laird
James Ware
EM
EM
simulated annealing
kriging
MetropolisMarquardt
K
20 30
40
8
3
Louisville
Memmphis
AtlantaNew Orleans
Chester Bliss
20 20
A B
probit analysis
probit
50 percent lethal does
LD-50 50%
LD-50 50%
toxicology
16
PAP. A. Paracelsus,1493-1541
LD-50
11
LD50
LD-10
LD-50
11
JTJ. T. Lichfield
20 60
LD-25LD8025%
80% 50%
LD-011%
65000
1%
LD-01
C 1933
DFranklin D.
Roosevelt
Frank Yates
Leningrad Plant
Institute
LD-50
20 50
Riga
20 60
30
central
limit theorem 20 30
conjecture
19
variate
K
symmetry
(kurtosis)
sufficient estimator
50
20 20 30
20
20
20 30
William FellerRichard
von Mises(Paul Lvy)
Andrei Kolmogorov
Jarl Waldemar Lindeberg
Harald Cramer
Abraham WaldHerman Hartley
Guido Castelnuovo
Corporate state
anti-intellectualism
University of Salamanca
Miguel de Unamuno
70 Millan
Astray
Francisco FrancoM
M
M
Princeton University
Columbia University
J
Emmy Noether
Bryn Mawr College
Aryan
1934
Lindeberg-Lvy Conditions
Wassily
Hoeffding1948
Annals of Mathematical
Statistics
statistic
U-U-statistics
U-
1914
1933
Ludwig Bieberbach
Richard Courant20
theories of real
analysis
Deutsche Mathematik
1940
1944
Harald Geppert
Hermann Schmid
1945 2
1946
Peter Blackett
operational research
operations research
10
20 80
chaos
12
theory
random
determinism
12
Brian DaviesExploring ChaosTheory and Experiment
ReadingMAPerseus Books1999
1963 Edward Lorenz
butterfly effect
20
Henri Poincar
Poincar plots
K
K
goodness of fit test
2
chi-square goodness of fit
testkai
(chi family)
2
K
2
2
1922
hypothesis testing
significance testing
24
significant
19
20 significant
significant
significant
P
P
P-value P
P
P
0.01 P
1929 Proceedings of
the Society for Psychical Research
P
psychical research
20
P 0.01
P 0.2
18
1928 35
University of
Kharkov
19 20
20 30
80
the University of Warsaw
1928
EEileen
E K
K
EK
E 1928-1933
E
E K
2
2
E
2
P
2
P
27
1939
1939
contagious distribution
1939
1939
1939
1974
11
E
P
E
P
K
E
E
13
13
E 6
E E
power
P
E
null hypothesis
alternative hypothesis
P
P
1956 LJ
Raj Raghu Bahadur
20 50
50%
4
8 2 5 8
4
0.30.
4
500
250
250
P
0.0001.
P P
P
P
P
1921
14
John Maynard Keynes
14
JM
1921
A Treatise on Probability
P
0.05 P
0.05
5%
1955
Statistical
Methods and Scientific Inference
20 60
David Cox
20 80
WW. Edwards Deming
24
1935
bulletin de la Socit Mathmatique de France
1981
David
Blackwell Howard
University
Lucien Lecam
Elizabeth Scott
Evelyn Fix
1962
20
50
12
20 80 AIDS
HIV human
immunodeficiency virus
20 30
15
HIV
15
epidemiology
interval
estimatepoint estimate
5.7
3.7 12.4
12.4
20
3.7
20
20 80 National
Academy of Science
John
Tukey 22
50
44%
3
44%
41%44%3%
47%44%+3%
1934
On the Two Different
Aspects of the Pepersentative Method
confidence intervals
confidence bounds
GMG. M. Bowley
Isaac Todhunter 19
K
Edgeworth
100% 0
95% 95%
fiducial probability
fiducial distribution
fiducial intervals
95%
95%
95%
95%
13 LJ
Bruno de Finetti
90% 95%
inverse
probability
18 Reverend
Thomas Bayes
Bayesian heresy
13
8
697 1797
150 1
1 34
17
1268
Doge Rainieri Zeno
30 30 9
9/30
9/29
8/29
JM
18
18 RT
5 the events
before the events after
A 4 A
CA
16
16
Bayess theorem
Reyes
syndromecase-control
study
95% A
B 5
Pearsonian revolution
20
20
60
20
Annals of Statistics
20 70
Frederidck MostellerDavid Wallace
Federalist
1787
James Madison
Alexander HamiltonJohn Jay
70
19
12
17
ifwhenbecauseoverwhilstasand
30
upon
0.23
3.24 12 11
upon
1.1
17
3
12
18
in 24 23
in 22 25
hyper-parameter
20
in 20
200
18
18
hyper-hyperparameter
20 80
EM
21
200
personal probability
17
probability
LJ 20 60
70 20
60
standard
gamble
67%
a
prior set of probabilities
prior probability
a posterior set of probabilities
5050
50%
20 80
prior odds
posterior odds
Bayes factor
12
12
1000001 5050
14
20
NAndrei N.
13
Kolmogorov 1987 85
Mariya
Yakovlevna Kolmogorov
Tambov
Vera Yakovlevna
Spring Swallows 5
k k
14
1920 17
15 16 Novgorod
14
14
20 30
1938
Norbert Wiener
1953
1963 Tbilisi
David Kendall
1942
Anna Dmitrievna Egorova
80
70
1971
Dmitri
Mendeleev
Pushkin
1953
50
Pavel Aleksandrov
Hardy
von
Karman
Gdel
Large Soviet Encyclopedia
1941
1954
1.
2.
18
3 5
19 20
18
20
17 18 20
axiomization of
probability theory
stochastic process
N
George Box
event
probability space
1965
1987 10 20
20 30
random variable
accidental magnitude
1956
The Annals of Mathematical
StatisticsSSS. S. Zarkovic
20 30
20
30
NVN. V.
Smirnov
VIV. I. Romanovsky
EE. Slutsky
DTrofim D.
Lysenko
Alexander Ya
Khintchine
Walter Shewhart
20 50 Nikita
Khrushchev
20 90
15
florence Nightingale
Crimean War
pid chart
Ivington
10
University CollegeLondon
Jeremy Bentham
Bedford
College
Nan Laird
6
3
K
K
K
K
Tables of the
Correlation Coefficient 1938
Brunsviga
20 30
16
S
Henden
J
Statistical Reserch
MemoirsFN
K
K
J
20 20 1940
K
1933 KFN
K 70
6
Chelsea
9
KFN
20
20 AAA. A.
Markov
FN
1939
1940 1941
100
30
E
FN
Combinatorial Chance
combinatorics
D. E.
Barton
1970
Riverside
1977 68
1988 1995
1962 FN
GamesGodsand Gambling
V
bivariate
6
16
20 40
Frank Wilcoxon
18
t
18
S
outlier
t
t
t
P
t
FN
Biometrics K
Biometrika
1945
BHenry B. Mann
Ohio State University D
D. Ransom Whitney
1940 1944
1947
19
nonparametric test
19
K
20 30
NV
N. V. Smirnov
ordered ranks
Herman Chemoff I
I. Richard Savage
ordered statistics
different
underlying distribution
20 60
distribution-free tests
K 1914
1971 Jaroslav
Hjek
1974 48
1.
2. parametric model
1948
the University of Tasmania
4 52
EJG 1897
the University of Melbourne
1927
EJG 1926
Hobart
1936
1948
12
1936
30000
2400
1948
philosophers stone
K
25
the University of
Chicago RRR. R. Bahadur LJ
L. J. Jimmie Savage 1956
Bahadur
warrior
savage
23 contaminated
ditributions
17
K
K
K
opportunity sample
20 30
Bombay
Calcutta
Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis
20 20
K FN
1931
Indian Statistical Institute
SN
S. N. RoyCRC. R. Rao RCR. C.
PKR. K. SenMadan Puri
Bose
20
20
10
judgment
sample
the Nielsen
ratings
Nielsen Media Research
specific subclasses
homogeneous groups
2000
random
sample
1970
20 30
20 30
1932 1939
YonkersMargaret
MartinBamard College
the U. S. Bureau of the Budget
1933 6
B
B. Altman department store
48 15
Florence Doty
Katherine Gibbs
Albany
the New York State Division of Placement
and Unemploymentthe office of research
and statistics
Morris Hanson 1933 the
University of Wyomingthe
Census Bureau
10%
40%the U. S.
Chamber of Commerce
0.5%
1937
1937
300 1500
2%
2%
the U. S. Postal Service
William
Hurwitz
1953
Sample Survey
Method and TheoryWilliam
Madou
21
20 60
Gallup Poll
Hansen Hurwitz
Jerome Cornfield
the National
Institutes of Health
case-control studies
the Framingham Study
1948 Massachusetts
typical town
50
Perils of Pauline
1967
1973 J
Wassily Leontief
20 40
input-output analysis
5*5
12*12
24*24
24*24
7
24*24
Mark
finetune
the
Consumer Price Indexthe
Current Population Surveythe
Census of Manufacturing 10
the intermediate adjustment
PC
Jawaharlal Nehrn
1962
30
E
4
8
72 5 7
18
1958 Centennial Review
Cigarettes, Cancer and
Statistics Nature
Lung Cancer and Cigarettes?
Cancer and Smoking
Mayo Clinic
Joseph Berkson
1959
5 the National
Cancer Institute,NCIthe American Cancer
Societythe Sloan-Kettering Institute
30
the Tobacco
Institute
1960
inductive
reasoning
Bertrand Russell 20 30
60
20
Principia Mathematica
set theory
symbolic logic 20
Aristotelian logic
Socrates
2500
19 20
propositions
TF22
22
TTrue
F
False
T
FM
maybe
90
andornot
equalsatomic
propositions
A B A causes B
3
thalidomide
IUD23
23
20 80 VGDthe case
of Marder V. G. D. Searle
95%0.63.0
20 30
pure reason
material implication
A B
B A
13
19 Robert Koch
infective agent
1.
2.
3.
50
5
1959
24Richard Doll
24
5 William Haenszel
EE. Culter
the School of
Ernst Wynder
controls 10 1958
5
retrospective studies
artificial sweetenerbladder
cancer
25
20 90 the Yale
Medical SchoolAlvan Feinstein
Ralph Horvitz
Feinstein-Horvitz rules
case-control
prospective study
1958
50 000
50 000
5
dose response
Hammond
Horn 187 783
1958 4
200 000
1958 30
VS.
Agent Orange
herbicide
20 70
inductive inference
19
1913 WGeorge W. Snedecor
University of Kentucky
University of Iowa
FY
F. Y. Edgeworth
20 30
Statistical
Methods1940
P 20 70
20 30
Gertrude Cox19001978
7
Methodist Chruch
1931
University of
California
William Cochran
1950
Experimental Designs
Science Citation Index
5
K
Galton Biometrical Laboratory
20
20 90
30%
13%
20
1940
University of North CarolinaFrank
Graham
Sam Wilks 20
North Carolina State
University
10
10
26
18901977
1921 1941 10
1930
Annuals of
Mathematical Statistics
20
1946
Duke University
the Census Bureau the
Bureau of Labor Statisticsthe National
Center for Health Statisticsthe Bureau of
Management and Budget
Janet Norwood 1991
Douglass College
Rutgers University
New JerseyNew Brunswick
19 Bernard
Norwood 20
1949
Tufts University
1979 1991
1979
New Deal
1963
1970
1978
CPI
0.2
market basket
weight
20
6
Weibull distribution
Rockwell
20 60
halothane
Yvonne Bishop
10
log-linear
model
20
20 20 SSamuel S. Wilks
19061964Texas
Euclid
order of infinity
the American Mathematical Society
RIR. I. Moore
FEverett F. Linquist
Journal
of Educational Psychology
1933
1939
Institute of Advanced Studies
HMH. M. Wedderburn
finite mathematical groups
Solomon Lefshefz
algebraic topology27
Luther Eisenhart
Educational Testing Service
27
Albert Einstein
Bell
Telephone Laboratories28
20 40
Office of Naval Research
Frederick Mosteller
W
Theodore W. Anderson
Alexander Mood
28
Shewhart chart
Walter Shewwhart
Stigler
UGeorge Udny Yule
Charles
Winsor
proximity
fuses
20
50
sequential estimation
sequential method
Plato
29
the Journal of the American Statistical Association
Abraham Wald
design
of experiments
20 60
infinite sets
sigma fields
29
20 80
Annals of Statistics
Annals of Probability
20 80
Applied Statistics30
20 50
80
Statistics in
Medicine
30
A
Statistics
80
28
1964 58 50
SSS. S. Wilks
Medal
real world
21
20 25
14
IJI. J. Good
Goodack
17
35
Whitechapel
Goodack
GoodsCameo Corner
IJ 1916 12 9
Isidore
The Virtuous Isidore
Jack IJ
10 2
Diophantine
Pells equation
Pythagorean Brotherhood
2 16
10
1993
Hardy 20 2030
12
Aske 31
Hampstead
serve and obey
Smart
31
1448 1689
20
1300
300
19
Jesus College
1941
partial dimension
Bletchley Park
1940
12 06 14 09 06 23 11 19 20 01 13
06
12
14
13
empirical Bayes
hierarchal Bayes methods
University of Manchester
classification theory
closeness
1967
Virginia Polytechnic Institute
1994
Blacksturg
Persi Diaconis
1945 1 31 IJ
HE
H. E. Dudeney
14
5
Dia Vernon
60
Persi Warren
Catskill
200
24
14
City College of New York
1971 26
32
1974
17
24
100
20
50
1920 1930
20 70
projection pursuit
10
100
90
30-40
500
10 5000
2 5000 2
10 20 10
5000
5000
22
1966
Tukeys one degree of freedom for
interactionTukeys fast Fourier
transformTukeys quick test
Tukeys lemma
exploratory data analysis
60
33
1915 New
Bedford
Brown
University
1939
topology
metamathematics
33
S
1938
1944
Fire
Control Research Office
20 P
Pablo Picasso
50
1945
Murray Hill
1987
Budenbom
5060
21
John Cornfield
60 70
Gregor Mendel
34
19401950
Men of Mathematics
1819
Numerology
35
Bode's law
aromatic
amines
60
K
histograms
square root
rootgram
whiskers
box plots
stem and leaf plots
bit software
4
4 5
20
time serieslinear
models
robust estimation
2000
23
20 80 S
18 19
1907
Albert Michelson
17
Johannes
Kepler
faulty value
1972
16
robust
36
error
36
error
FDA
FDA
HF
blunders
George Box
robust
residual
1986
lewisite
1943
Joan
1978
robust
robustness
the probability of
errorBradley
Efron 1968
t EJG
E. J. G. Pitman
20 60
1972
contaminated
distribution
20%
lazy eye
Monte
37
Carlo
20 50
10
80%
37
1.
2.
1964
Box-Cox
transformations
24
1980 NBC
70
NBC
80
WW. Edwards Deming
1939
1947 G
G. Mac Arthur
American way
Ichiro
Ishikawa
JUSE
JUSE
Statistics
Day
1980 NBC
50
50 50
3
3
3 3
1/5 50
3 1% 6 6
10% 50
3
10
13
15
70 zero defect
80
TQM
reliable
special causescommon
environmental
100 000
1920-1930 Walter
ShewhartFrank Youden
1970
Star-Spangled Banner
1900 IowaSioux
University of Wyoming
University of Colorado
Agnes Belle
1927
IllinoisCicero
38
Hawthorne
AT&T
5%
38
Hawthornee effect
20
30
5%
1927
12
2000
30000
1993 12 10
California 93
12 20
11
WThe W. Edwards
Deming Institute
11 J E
A B
25
20
60
19
Stella Cunliffe
1976 11 12
30 London School of
Economics
Roterdam
Bergen-Belsen
1929
1946
7
Newcastle
queuing theory
3
7
1970
the British Home Office
10 15%
P
0.001
26
65
1886
1912 26
33
1919
FOLK
theorem
Lindeberg 20 30
1.
2
martingale
martingale
50%50%
Martingale
Martingale
Martique
1940
20 80 Aarhus
UniversityErik Anderson
University of UtrechtRichard Gill
1
20
Richard Olshen
Lee-Jen Wei
20 80
27
20 80
Rechard Peto
5
Aalen
martingale approach
20 50
M. C. Anderson Hospital
Edmund Gehan
A
A
A A
A A
intert to treat
39
39
1963 Francis Anscombe
P
P
1977 R 23
P
significance testing
hypothesis testing
P
W
P
evolutionary variation
in operationsEVOP
analysis of
variance
K
method of moments
P
Abraham Wald
sequential analysis
20 60
Baltimore
20 80 90
Donald Rubin
A B
1980
boot-strap
28
Guido Castelnuovo
1915 University of
Rome
1919
40 7
1935
70
1952
87
40
Corrado GiniIstituto
Centrale Statistica in Rome
20 30
Francesco Paolo Cantelli18751966
18
1916
41
18 Elementsformal mathematics
theorem
lemma
Joseph
Glivenko
Stieltjes integral
1933
20
20
20 50 60 70
80
1982 Bradley
Efron Bootstrap
1982
resampling
computer-intensive
fuzzy
approximation nonoptimal
kernel
Bart Kosko
19
Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz
Norbert Wiener
20
70
42
20
42
compound-Poisson distribution
stuttering PoissonPoisson-binomial
29
1962 Thomas Kuhn
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
19
19
19
Lambert Adolphe Jacques Qutelet
optimum estimation
1 2
risk analysis
65% 3%
65% 3%
95%
correlation
correlated
underlying assumption
16 Girolamo
Cardano Ars Magna
16
500
1.
2.
3.
0.0001
10000 1
A B C ABC
the Probable and the
Probable
common law
50%
gate crashers
1000
499 1000
50.1%
1000 1499
model logic
21
95%
95%
95% 1
95%
A
B
null hypothesis
permutation test
20 80
The U. S. National Academy of Science
LJ
1954
The Foundations of Statistics
95% 72%
1921
A Treatise on Probability
72% 68%
partial ordering
1921
Hebrew University
Daniel KahnemanAmos Tversky
20 70 80
P
P. Slovic
5050
90% 75%
1974
Patrick Suppes
improper distributions
queuing theory
21
21
20 70
fuzzy
set theory
20
W. H. Freeman
Don Gecewicz
Eleanor Wedge Vivien Weiss
Patrick Farace Victoria
TomaselliBill PageKaren BarrMeg Kuhta Julia Derosa
1857 KKarl Pearson
G Guido
1865
Castelnuovo
1866 GGregor Mendel
FPFrancesco Paolo
1875
Cantelli
W S
1876
William Sealy Gosset
1886 PPaul Lvy
RAPonald Aylmer
1890
Fisher
PCParasanta
1893
Chandra Mahalanobis
1893 HHarald Cramr
1894 JJerzy Neyman
1895 K
E S Egon S.
1895 S
Pearson
1899 CChester Bliss
GMGertrude M.
1900 M
Cox
1900 WW. Bateson
1
Biometrika FF. Galton
K
1902
1 RR. Weldon
ANAndrei
1903
Nikolaevich Kolmogorov
SSSamuel S.
1906 S
Wilks
The probable Error of the
1908 WS
Mean t
students t-test
F N Florence
1909
Nightingale David
1911 FFrancis Galton
The
1911 K
Grammar of Science
J Jerome
1912
Cornfield
1912 RA
correlation
1915 RA
coefficient
1915 JJohn Tukey
1916 Glivenko-Cantelli lemma FP
2
L J L. J.
1917 LJ
Jimmie Savage
Calcotlo G G.
1919
della probabilit Castelnuovo
1919 Rothamsted Experimental RA
Station
Lebesgue
1920 HH. Lebesgue
integration
A Treatise J M J. M.
1921
on Probability Keynes
1921 RA
Studies in Crop Variation.
1923 RA
Studies in Crop Variation.
1924 RA
Studies in Crop Variation.
The
Elimination of mental Defect
1924 RA
1925 Statistical Methods for RA
Research Workers
3
1925 RA
ML Estimation
1926 RA
1927 RA
Studies in Crop Variation.
Neyman
Pearson
1928 JES
hypothesis testing
LHCTippett
1928
RA
1928 RA
Studies in Crop Variation.
Annals of
1930 Mathematical Statistics HH. Carver
The
1930 Genetical Theory of Natural RA
Selection
Indian PCP. C.
1931
Statistical Institute Mahalanobis
1933 AN
Sankhya
1933 PC
4
probit analysis
1933 CC.Bliss
S SSSamuel
1933
Princeton S. Wilks
confidence
1934 J
intervals
central limit
1934 PJ
theorem
1934 Leningrad Institute CChester Bliss
for Plant Protection
martingale theory
1935 P
The Design of
1935 RA
Experiments
1936 K
MM. Hansen
1937
FF. Stephan
1937 WS
Statistical Tables for RAF
1938
Biological Agricultural and F. Yates
Medical Research
Statistical GWG. W.
1940
Methods Snedecor
5
H Henri
1941
Lebesgue
Mathematical Methods of
1945 H
Statistics
1945 F
1947 A
sequential estimation theory
MannWhitney HGDR
1947
EJGE. J.
1948
G. Pitman
WGW. G.
1949
Cochran
WGGM
1950
G
1952
Guido Castelnuovo
1957 RA
Statistics of E J
1958
Extremes EJGumbel
rebust GEPG. E.
1959
P. Box
6
1959 ELE. L. Lehmann
Combinatorial FNDE
1960
Chance D. E. Barton
Savage-de LJB
1962
Finetti B. de Finetti
1962 RA
1962 RA
1964 S SS
An analysis of GEPDR
1964
transformations D. R. Cox
1966 FP
1967 JJ. Hjek
YMMY. M. M.
1969
Bishop
reliability theory
1970 NNancy Mann
Weibull distribution
1970 Games Gods and FN
Gambling
7
1971 P
1971 LJ LJ
D F D. F.
Andrews PJP.
J. BickelFRF.
1972 R. Hampel PJP.
J. Huber WH
W. H. RogersJW
J. W. Tukey
1972 PC
S V Stella
1975 Royal Statistical
Cunliffe
Society
1976 GEP
1977 DR
1977 Exploratory Data Analysis J
1978 M GM
1979 C
1979 J
7
1979 Bureau of Labor JJanet Norwood
Statistics
1980 S ES
1981 J
chaos theory
RR. Abraham
1982
CC. Shaw
AA. Tversky
1983
DD. Kahneman
1985 H
1987 AN
Kernel based
1987 regression TT. Yamakawa
LJ
1989 LJL. J. Cohen
1990 Spline Models for GG. Wahba
Observational Data
OO. Aalen E
1992 E. AndersonR
R. Gill
7
1995 FN
Cochrans
CC. Jennison
1997 methods BWB. W.
sequential analysis Turnbull
R A R. A.
EM
BetenskyJCJ.
1999
C. LindseyLM
L. M. Ryan
2000 J