IS102 CAT

Assessment of Project Presentation

Project Group : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 (please circle one)

Project Title : ____________________________ (in full)

The instructor will grade the presentation based on the following criteria.

Project Presentation Scores

Criteria 0~2 3 4 5
Each member in the team
There is weak co- There is very strong
presents his/her share of
ordination among There is some co- evidence of team work
power point slides with
team members. The ordination among and co-ordination. The
Organization/content very little co-ordination
team gives team members. team gives strong
of presentation and among members (not clear
impression of being Student presentations impression of being
power point slides on who is doing what).
somewhat are seen as organized very organized and
Presentation is very
disorganized and and efficient. efficient in their
disorganized and
inefficient. presentation.
inefficient.
Presentation
Presentation uses Presentation has unique
Presentation overall has occasionally uses
high quality graphics graphics that explain
Graphics superfluous graphics or no graphics that rarely
to support text and and reinforce screen
graphics. support text and
presentation. text and presentation.
presentation.
Clear layout and Distinctive clear
User Interface, Cluttered and confusing Clear layout and
appearance. But not interface, Well
Layout and interface. Can be appearance. Easy to
easy to read and designed, user friendly
Appearance improved. read, use and relate.
relate. and logical
All the members
Some members are
Most of the members in Most members are at demonstrate full
uncomfortable with
the team do not have grasp ease with expected knowledge (more than
information and are
Subject Knowledge of information; most answers to all required) by answering
able to answer only
cannot answer questions questions, but fail to all class questions with
rudimentary
about subject. elaborate. explanations and
questions.
elaboration.
Most of the members read All members maintain
off the report with no eye Some members Most members eye contact all the time
contact, and there is no occasionally use eye maintain eye contact with the classmates.
attempt to critically engage contact with the most of the time with There is obvious
Critical Engagement the class or share classmates, but still the classmates. They attempt to engage
of learning knowledge. Students are read most of report make reasonably learning and promote
obviously going through and make some good attempt to learning. They have
the motion of doing attempt to engage the critically engage the obviously succeeded in
presentation. class in learning class in learning. critically engaging the
class in learning.
The group shows no The group shows The group shows The group shows
patience and understanding little patience and some level of patience and
in working together, and understanding in patience and understanding in
lack initiative to help the working together, understanding in working together and
Collaborative team
weaker students. There is and lack initiative to working together and helping the weaker
efforts
obvious tension in the help the weaker helping the weaker students. There is
group. There is no students. There is students. There is excellent spirit of team
commitment at all from some tension in the good spirit of team work in the group.
every member. group. work in the group.
IS102 CAT

Assessment of Project Report

Project Group : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 (please circle one)

Project Title : ____________________________ (in full)

The instructor will grade the report based on the following criteria:

Need Improvement Meet Expectations Exceptional

Objective/Criteria
(0~1) (2~3) (4~5)
Creative application of
Application did not "fit" Application was relevant and
Effectiveness for Excel to problem. Uses
problem. Other solutions seemed useful in solving the stated
Given Application Excel strength to address
more suitable. problem.
need of problem.
Listed and analysed only some Listed and analysed pertinent
Aanalysing the Listed and analysed the
of pertinent issues and lacks in- issues but lacks in-depth
Pertinent Issues pertinent issues in depth
depth analysis. analysis.
Correctly identified the
Correctly identified the key Correctly identified the key
problem and provided a
Identify the key problem(s) without providing problem(s) but did not provide
strong supporting
problem(s) any justification of the a strong supporting justification
justification for selection of
problem(s) for selection of the problem(s).
the problem(s)
Exhibits independent thinking.
Originality & Lack creative element. Standard Exhibits originality.
New elements to problem.
Novelty subject did not extend problem. Creative and interesting.
Includes analytics.
Provided a plausible
Providing a Provided a plausible solution Provided a plausible solution
solution with good
Plausible Solution without justifications with inadequate justifications
justifications
Presenting a list Identified an appropriate list of Identified a list of
Identified only one or two
of alternative alternative but failed to provide alternatives and provided
alternatives
solutions details for all the alternatives details for each
Listed the pros and cons of only Listed the pros and cons of all Listed the pros and cons of
Comparing and
some alternatives and failed to the alternatives but failed to all alternatives and provided
contrasting the
provide a rigorous, comparative provide a rigorous, comparative a rigorous, comparative
alternatives
evaluation of the alternatives analysis analysis of them
Well structured and
Structure of the Poorly structured and materials Well structured but materials materials are presented in a
essay are disconnected are not well connected coherent manner, with good
linkages