Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Priya Patel
Adam Padgett
ENGL 102
02/28/2017
Inquiry: Is the definition of a racist we perceive to be today, just a way of covering up the racism
Proposed Thesis: I argue that racism is not as prevalent in todays society as it used to be in the
pre 1960s, yet we dont realize that there are subtle racial biases, in the 21st century, that are held
Fieseler, Robert. "Exposing Bias: Race and Racism in America." Harvard Extension School.
This Harvard article is an interview between two professors who teach race in American at the
University. They are talking about how there is a bias towards certain races that everyone holds
in our society and that is what is causing oppression of races. . The article states, In Brazil,
knowing someones color is a clue about his or her social status, but its not the only piece of
information that you need to know. Are they wealthy? Are they educated? (Fieseler). It also
talks about how in the past, in America, your social status was based on your race. This idea
could potentially affect the future generations and cause others to believe so without have a valid
reason of why? Often biased actions are individualistic. We all have different opinions and we
choose to allow certain biased views to enter our minds. This can relate to the main inquiry in
which it is trying to explain that racism today is seen by color but not just that also their social
Patel 2
standing, so it is not complete racism. This article is credible because it is from Harvard
University and the questions are answered form well accredited professors who are professors at
the university. This source is suitable for my paper. It helps show how racism and race is viewed
Blake, John. "The new threat: 'Racism without racists'" CNN. Cable News Network, 27 Nov.
Blake talks about how there is racial bias happening in America currently. This was explained
through the psychological experiment of two pictures. One picture of a white man with a knife
attacking an unarmed white man and the second being the white man with a knife attacking an
unarmed black man. In the first picture, when asked, many people got the answer correct when
asked who was holding the knife. In the second picture however, both black and white who
answered, said that the black man was holding the knife. This is showing how a certain racism
cannot be grouped by race and that we are we have bias within and out of our race. This
experiment, conducted by CNN, shows that there is racial bias and that humans are always
biased and put certain people in groups based on race. Ross says. "This is one of the most
insidious things about bias. People may absorb these things without knowing them." (Blake).
They however do not consider it racism until something great or profound is done to a certain
race. This source is credible even though it is news because the article was found from a google
scholars search. The article is from 2014 and is relatively new. The article could be biased in
experiment, again we dont know if those people didnt identify with being racist in the
beginning of the experiment. This source would defiantly be suitable for my topic because it is
talking about how racism is subtler now and isnt really seen as racism.
Patel 3
Brown, Geraldine. "The Millennials (Generation Y): Segregation, Integration and Racism."
The central claim of this source is that racism has changed as the generations have. In generation
Y, also known as the millennials, racism has become more varied among many racial groups
rather than a few main groups we were used to in the past (Brown 7). Brown explains how when
asked about racism, the first thing to pop up in our minds is the history of learning about one race
dominating another minor race (Brown 7). However, the case with racism has become vaster in
this generation. He states that even if one is not racist towards another race, they are also racist
within their own. Certain cultures very importance based on the shade of their skin within their
race (Brown 7). The source itself seems credible due to it being a peer reviewed source. She is
the current editor of the ABNF journal, a RN, and has a PhD in Nursing. This article is biased in
the sense that it is targeting the millennials yet that varies from 1980s to the early 2000s, so it
kind of implies that there was no racism that was acknowledged greatly within a race before
then. This source is suitable for my project because it goes over a key topic, which is what is
Kristof, Nicholas. "Is Everyone a Little Bit Racist?" The New York Times. The New York
In this article Nicholas Kristof is talking about how there is stereotyping within each race. For
African Americans you think that young males are related to criminal activity. However, there is
also those who think that Americans are white. Not all Americans are white. The main point in
this article is that they are people who believe in equality yet they have a biased view on the
Patel 4
world, and that is the supposed cause of racism to happen. An interesting experiment was
described in this article as well and it showed how we can be racist subconsciously through video
games. A student from the University of Colorado used an online shooter game to test if there
was bias between white and black. The students were the police officers who were shown a
series of black and white males with some holding guns and some holding innocent objects. In
the result more blacks were shot in the video game, especially with undergraduate students
playing. The first time I took the test, years ago, I shot armed blacks in an average of 0.679
seconds while waiting slightly longer 0.694 seconds to shoot armed whites (Kristof).
Relating this back to the inquiry question, this article is showing how we associated guns with
the blacks more so than whites. It shows that we rely on more associations with racism than skin
colors. This source is somewhat credible, it is a popular article rather than peer reviewed, and
was written in 2014 so relatively new. The author is a human rights & women rights activist, as
well as interested in health and global affairs. The article could be biased in that we dont know
everyone who was used in the experiment. That information might vary the results. Was it
student who believed they werent racist going in? This source is suitable because it shows how
we subconsciously stereotype certain races. When doing so you may not realize why but your
mind automatically puts certain groups of people in certain categories leading to racism.
Northup, Temple. "Is Everyone a Little Bit Racist? Exploring Cultivation Using Implicit and
Explicit Measures." Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, Sept.
This source is more focused on the journalism side of the racism. The article talks about how
there is a unbalanced view of each race in media in todays news. One example is of how
Patel 5
African Americans are seen more as criminals than other races due to racial stereotyping.
Especially in the eye of the media (Northup 38). Due to this being the media it easily allows
others to be influenced causing the general population to associated criminals with a certain race
over others. This article is credible since it is a peer reviewed source and the author, Temple
Northup, has good knowledge of mass communications. The article relates to the inquiry in
which racism isnt so much that blacks are beneath us but that we associated certain negative
activities with a race, whereas before in the pre 1960s it was just solely based on color of the
skin. This article could be somewhat biased because the article only talks about media being
racist when the title is Is Everyone A Little Bit Racist. The title can be misleading in the way that
others think its generalized but instead there is just one topic. This source is somewhat suitable
for my topic; I use the example to stress that we automatically correlated a race to an activity
Mullainathan, Sendhil. "Racial Bias, Even When We Have Good Intentions." The New York
Times. The New York Times, 03 Jan. 2015. Web. 28 Feb. 2017.
The author in this article is writing about how there is subtle discrimination that is happening
more currently but we dont realize it. The key to fast thinking discrimination is that we all
share it. Good intentions do not guarantee immunity. (Mullaninathan). This doesnt mean you
are consciously being racist but rather subconsciously. We have snap judgements that come from
associating certain races to a category. Relating back to the inquiry question, this article shows
that racism has become more of a snap judgement rather than disgust by physical appearances. In
the past it was based on color only but now an days its about the race and what they do
commonly. Those acts are used to discriminate the groups of races, and that shows superiority.
Patel 6
This article is somewhat credible even though the article is from New York Times, because the
author is a Harvard professor. The bias in this article could be when the article says that Many
studies show yet there is no detail of the studies in which they show more prejudice shoves
toward a race. We dont know who was involved in these studies. This article would be
somewhat suitable for my topic that it explains how more racism occurs subconsciously for those