You are on page 1of 3

RATIONALE CHECKLIST

Rationale V
PART I: ED 289A Module 5
Describe a teaching artifact that Part 1
represents the overall HTSB
standard I. HTSB OVERALL STANDARD
Standard 5: Application of Content
PART II:
Connect the teaching artifact to II. TEACHING ARTIFACT
a sub-standard and assess your Field Observation
proficiency
III. COURSE
PART III: ED289: Educational Psychology
Improve your proficiency for the
HTSB standard IV. TEACHING ARTIFACT DESCRIPTION
College supervisor supervises a lesson taught by Candidate in class.

PARTS I-III DEFINED V. TEACHING ARTIFACT RESULTS


For this assignment, my college supervisor came to observe my class
PART I: during a lesson in the heat transfer graphics unit. I showed her how my
State standard, teaching artifact, communication with learners, families and colleagues help to develop
and course name. Provide an collaborative relationships. By keeping in constant contact with my students,
accurate description of the their families and my professional learning community, this provides the best
artifact. Provide a sufficient learning outcomes for students.
description of the artifact results.

PART II:
Identify at least one appropriate
sub-standard and include the
entire language.. Connect the
language of the sub-standard
to the artifact. State your
proficiency level for the sub-
standard. Provide appropriate
evidence that supports your self
assessment.

PART III:
Identify an appropriate sub-
standard and clearly state a
desired improvement. Describe
at least two appropriate research
findings with viable resources.
Describe/demonstrate a specific
example how you plan to
improve.
RATIONALE CHECKLIST Part 2
PART I: I. SUB-STANDARD
Describe a teaching artifact that 10.4 CANDIDATE COMMUNICATES WITH LEARNING COMMUNITY TO
represents the overall HTSB DEVELOP COLLABORATION - Does Candidate use technology and other
standard forms of communication to develop collaborative relationships with learners,
families, colleagues and the local community?
PART II:
Connect the teaching artifact to II. CONNECTION TO ARTIFACT
a sub-standard and assess your I demonstrate that I use technology and other forms of communication
proficiency to develop collaborative relationships by attending weekly professional
learning community meetings, attending parent-teacher conferences
PART III: and having discussions with my students which guides my lessons for
Improve your proficiency for the observation. In the lesson observed by my college supervisor, the tshirt
HTSB standard project we were working on is the result of a combination of student interest
and PLC collaboration to create common assessments with my peers.

PARTS I-III DEFINED III. SELF-ASSESSMENT


I would rate myself as a 4 (Candidate always does this as a teacher) or
PART I:
exceeds proficiency because I meet with my coworkers weekly to work on
State standard, teaching artifact,
making sure our curriculum is aligned and best serves this group of students
and course name. Provide an
each year. I also keep in constant communication with parents and seek
accurate description of the
feedback from students about units and projects to help guide my decisions
artifact. Provide a sufficient
about future lessons.
description of the artifact results.
IV. EVIDENCE OF SELF-ASSESSMENT
PART II:
One evidence of self-assessment is in the commendations submitted by my
Identify at least one appropriate
college supervisor and our discussions about collaborating with families and
sub-standard and include the
other professionals.
entire language. Connect the
language of the sub-standard
to the artifact. State your
proficiency level for the sub-
standard. Provide appropriate
evidence that supports your self
assessment.

PART III:
Identify an appropriate sub-
standard and clearly state a
desired improvement. Describe
at least two appropriate research
findings with viable resources.
Describe/demonstrate a specific
example how you plan to
improve.
RATIONALE CHECKLIST Part 3
PART I: I. SUB-STANDARD TO IMPROVE
Describe a teaching artifact that 9.7 CANDIDATE IS FAIR AND EQUITABLE TO EVERYONE - Is Candidate fair
represents the overall HTSB and equitable in his/her treatment of students, parents, colleagues and the
standard public?

PART II: II. WHAT TO IMPROVE?


Connect the teaching artifact to I am working on maximizing my efforts of being fair across the board, but it is
a sub-standard and assess your something Id like to continue working on.
proficiency
III. RESEARCH FINDINGS
PART III: i. This article explains how fair isnt equal. I liked the argument made that
Improve your proficiency for the fairness is not necessarily treating all students the same because not all
HTSB standard students are the same - they have different motivations, choices, needs
and causes for behaviors. Some tips I found helpful are having flexible
consequences, teaching the class the concept of fair versus equal, keep
PARTS I-III DEFINED discipline private between you and the student and be willing to discuss
your strategy students and parents.
PART I:
Resource: https://www.edutopia.org/blog/fair-isnt-equal-richard-curwin
State standard, teaching artifact,
ii. This article discusses tips for being fair in the classroom. Some
and course name. Provide an
suggestions include knowing when youre having a bad day and
accurate description of the
correcting it or letting your students know what is going on, apologize
artifact. Provide a sufficient
when making a mistake or having a misunderstanding, and randomly
description of the artifact results.
select students when choosing students to work on something so it
doesnt appear as favoritism. Resource: http://www.brighthubeducation.
PART II:
com/classroom-management/15435-fairness-and-equality-in-the-
Identify at least one appropriate
classroom/
sub-standard and include the
entire language.. Connect the
IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF FINDINGS
language of the sub-standard
Based on my research, I plan to implement effective fairness in my classroom
to the artifact. State your
proficiency level for the sub- by following these tips:
standard. Provide appropriate 1) Having flexible consequences to choose from
evidence that supports your self 2) Discussing fairness versus equality with students
assessment. 3) If possible, letting students know when there is an issue going on that may
affect my decision making
PART III:
4) Apologizing when I make a mistake
Identify an appropriate sub-
5) Selecting students at random or using alphabetical order to determine
standard and clearly state a
desired improvement. Describe when students get to work on projects (that require one-on-one instruction)
at least two appropriate research
findings with viable resources.
Describe/demonstrate a specific
example how you plan to
improve.

You might also like