Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sample, William
Dr. Colombo
UWRT 1104
29 February 2017
Works Cited
Sample
2
1. The purpose of the jury is described by LawTeacher as to weigh up the evidence and to
decide what the true facts of the case are or what actually happened.
2. According to The Guardian, jurors are settling the fates of their fellow citizens in crown
courts up and down the country every day of the week, determining by their verdicts
whether or not defendants are guilty of the most serious crimes of violence and
Juries must come up with a verdict and decide if someone accused of a crime is innocent of
guilty. They must use evidence presented to them and look at facts to decide their verdict.
top
1. According to The Guardian, At the start of every criminal trial, the jurors take an oath to
try the defendant and give a true verdict according to the evidence. They also mention
that there is no other part of the constitution that is so open to the public, where ordinary
people participate in decisions such immediate importance and wield real power.
2. Cheryl Thomas believes a bias may still exist with juries and said As a result, American
research showing White juror bias against non-White defendants has been relied upon to
that prevents biases. She says How the jury is delivered and implemented is also
extremely important, not only because the juries should be replicable and participants
outputs should not depend on the personal attributes of the facilitator or educator, but
because explicit training, guidelines, and processes are in place, and a sense of
than they aquit in rape, they do not exhibit any racial bias and they only fail to reach
doubt that from time to time juries take likes and dislikes to witnesses, advocates and
even the judge but it would be interesting to find out how often and why (Morton 361).
Biases cannot be completely abolished but can be prevented by making jurors decide under
oath. There will always be likes and dislikes among the jurors and they will be impacted
top
Sample
4
1. LawTeacher describes the process to reach a verdict by saying the judge gives the
direction to the jury on the relevant law, which the jury has to apply to the facts of the
A verdict is reached by looking at the facts the jury is presented with and they usually make the
top
Sample
5
1. Law teacher says elgibility for the jury service used to depend upon the existence of the
property qualification, and the juries were criticized for being predominatly male,
middle-aged, middle minded and middle class which is probably why the system has
changed.
2. Vallejos says that there is explicit training, guidelines, and processes that are required
of jurors.
There are specific qualifications to participate in a jury and they must be informed and vetted to
be involved.
top
Sample
6
1. Lawteacher believes the judge gives the direction to the jury on the relevant law and
the public which means the constitution has an influence on the democratic processes
There are many factors that may influence the jury including the way the judge handles the case
top
Sample
7
Works Cited
Mendelle, Paul. Why Juries Work Best. Liberty Central, Guardian News and
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/feb/21/juries-work-best-research.
www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/research-and-analysis/moj-
Carter, Ramona Statache, Tom Rodden, Derek McAuley, Monica Cano, Svenja
Sample
8
Adolphs, and Claire O'Malley. "Juries." Acm Sigcas Computers and Society.
law/the-jury-system.php?cref=1>.
top