Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In ordinary language, the term market refers to a public place in which goods and services are bought and
sold. In economics, market stands for any effective arrangement for bringing buyers and sellers into
contact with one another such that the prices of same goods tend to equalize easily and quickly.
Economists understand by the term market not any particular market place in which things are bought
and sold but the whole of any region in which buyers and sellers are in such free intercourse with one
another that the price of the same goods tends to equality easily and quickly
- Cournot
Market is any area over which buyers and sellers are in close touch with one another, either directly or
through dealers, that the price obtainable in one part of the market affects the price paid in other parts
- Benham
Thus the market has the following basic components. (Managerial Economics by R.Cauvery. Page no. 174)
A commodity should be offered for sale in the market. Otherwise there is no question of buying the
commodity. Therefore, existence of sellers is a necessary for any market.
Buyers and sellers should have close contact with each other.
There should be price for the commodity. The exchange of commodities between buyers and sellers
occurs at a particular price which is mutually agreeable to both the buyers and sellers.
There should be buyers of the product. If a country consists of people who are poor, there can hardly
be market for luxuries like cars, VCR etc.
A market is said to be perfect when all the potential sellers and buyers are completely aware of
the prices at which transactions take place and all the offers made by other sellers and buyers, and when
any buyer can purchase from any seller and conversely.
Under such a condition, the price of a commodity will tend to be the same after allowing for the
cost of transport including import all over the market.
Perfect competition refers to the market structure where competition among the sellers and buyers
prevails in its most perfect form.
In theory perfect competition implies no rivalry among firms. Perfect competition, therefore can
be defined as a market structure characterized by a complete absence of rivalry among the individual
firms.
The term perfect competition refers to a set of conditions prevailing in the market. a perfectly competitive
market is one which has the following characteristics.
1. Large number of sellers and buyers. (Managerial Economics by D.N.Dwivedi. Page no. 217)
Under perfect competition, the number of sellers and buyers is very large. The number of sellers and
buyers is so large that the share of each seller in total supply and the share of each buyer in total demand
is so small that no single seller can affect the market price by changing his supply, nor can a single buyer
by changing his demand.
3. Free entry and free exit. ( Principles of Economics by D.N.Dwivedi. Page no234)
There is no legal, technological, economic, financial barrier on entry of new firms to the industry. Nor is
there any restriction on exit of the firms from the industry. That is, a firm may enter the industry and quit
it at its will. Thus, when normal profit of the industry increases, new firms enter the industry and if profits
decrease and better opportunities are available, firms leave the industry.
5. Perfect knowledge of Market condition. (Fundamentals of Business Economics by D.M.Mithani. Pg no. 230)
Perfect competition requires that all the buyers and sellers must possess perfect knowledge about the
existing market condition, especially regarding the market price, quantities and sources of supply. When
there is such perfect knowledge, no buyer could be charged a price different from the market price.
Similarly no seller would unnecessarily lose by selling at a lower price than the prevailing market price.
This way, perfect knowledge ensures transaction at a uniform price.
Price determination under perfect competition: (Economics for Managers by D.M.Mithani. Page no.158)
Under perfect competition, there is a single ruling market price the equilibrium price,
determined by the interaction of forces of total demand (of all the buyers) and total supply (of all the
sellers) in the market.
Thus, both the market or equilibrium price and the volume of production in a market under
perfect competition are determined by the intersection of total demand and total supply. To elucidate the
price of intersection, let us consider hypothetical data on market demand for and market supply of wheat,
as in table below.
Comparing the market demand and supply position at alternative possible prices, we find that
when the price is Rs. 20, supply of wheat is 10,000 kg., but demand for wheat is only 1,000 kg. Hence,
9,000 kg. of wheat supply remains unsold. This would bring a downward pressure on price, as the seller
would compete and the force will push down the price. When the price falls to Rs. 19, demand rises to
3,000 kg., while the supply will contract to 8,000 kg. Still the supply is in excess of demand. Thus, the
surplus of the supply causes a further downward pressure on price. Eventually, the price will tend to fall.
This process continues till the price settles at Rs. 17 per kg at which the same amount (5000 kg) is
demanded as well as supplied. This is termed as equilibrium price. Equilibrium is the market clearing
price. In this price, a market demand tends to be equal to the market supply.
If, however, we begin from a low price (Rs. 15 per kg.) we find that the demand (10,000 kg.)
exceeds the supply (2,000 kg.). Thus, there is a shortage at Rs. 15 per kg. This causes an upward pressure
on the price, so the price will tend to move up. When the price rises, the demand contracts and the supply
expands. This process continues till the equilibrium price is reached, at which the demand becomes equal
to supply. At equilibrium price, there is neutral pressure of demand and supply forces as both are equal in
quantity. In general, a pictorial depiction of price is determined at the intersection point of the demand
curve and the supply curve.
In the above fig PM is the equilibrium price, at which OM is the quantity demanded as well as
supplied. At point P, the demand curve intersects the supply curve. To understand the process of
equilibrium, suppose the price is not at the equilibrium point. Now, if the price is higher than the
equilibrium price, as OP1, then at this price the supply is P 1b, while the demand is P1a. Thus, there is a
surplus amounting to ab. That is to say, more is offered for sale than what the people are willing to buy at
the prevailing price. Hence, to clear the stock of unsold output, the competing sellers will be induced to
reduce the price. Eventually, a downward movement and adjustment, as shown by the downward pointed
arrows, will begin, which would lead to
(i) The contraction of supply as the firms will be prompted to reduce their resources in the industry,
(ii) The expansion of demand, as the marginal buyers and other potential buyers will be attracted to buy in the
market and old buyers also may be induced to buy more at the falling price. Similarly if the price is
below the equilibrium level, the demand tends to exceed the supply.
At OP2 price, for instance, the demand is P 2d, while the supply is P2c. thus, there is a shortfall of
supply amounting to cd. That is to say, buyers want to purchase more than what is available in the market
at the prevailing price. This induces the competing buyers to bid up the price. So, an upward push and
adjustment will develop as shown by the arrows pointed upwards. Thus, the demand contracts as marginal
buyers will be driven away from the market and some buyers will buy less than before. On the other hand,
the supply expands as the existing firms will increase their output to which new firms will also add their
output. Evidently when the price is set at an equilibrium point at which the demand curve intersects the
supply curve, shortages and surpluses disappear, hence, there is perfect adjustment between demand and
supply under the given conditions.
Monopoly is that market form in which a single producer controls the entire supply of a single
commodity which has no close substitutes. There must be only one seller or producer. This sole seller in
the market is called monopolist. The commodity produced by the producer must have no close
substitutes. Monopoly can exist only when there are strong barrier to entry. The barriers which prevent the
entry may be economic, institutional or artificial in nature.
From the above discussion, let us summarize the main characteristics of monopoly as follows.
A monopolist is a price maker and not a price taker. In fact, he is independent in making the price
decisions. He need not take into account, while determining his own price/prices, the possible reactions of
other firms, as the products of these firms are not closely competitive substitute for his product in any
significant way. So he can afford to ignore them. The monopolist, as such is in a position to fix the price
for the product as he likes.
A monopolist has control over the market supply; hence he is a price maker. Thus, under the
given cost and demand situation of his product in any period, he has to determine price and output
simultaneously. His price output decision is obviously motivated by profit maximization. Evidently, he
will adjust output and price in such a way that marginal cost and marginal revenue are equal, whereby he
reaps maximum profit. Thus, the profit maximizing combination of output and price is determined by
comparing the cost and revenue schedules at different price and output levels, as shown in Table.
A comparison of column 6 and 7 in table shows that when a monopolist produces 4 units, his
MR=MC (Rs. 80 in both cases) at price Rs. 140 per unit. In this situation, total revenue is Rs. 560, while
total cost is Rs. 500; hence total profit is Rs. 60. Considering per unit basis, the average revenue per unit
is Rs. 140 while the average cost is Rs. 125, so profit per unit is Rs. 15. For 4 units of output, thus the
total profit is Rs. 15 * 4 = Rs. 60.
(Hypothetical Data)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Quantit Price Total Total Average Margina Margina Remark Profit
y of (Rs.) Revenue cost Cost l Cost l s (+)
Output Average (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) Revenue or
(Q) Revenue (TR) (TC) (AC) (MC) (Rs.) Loss (-)
(AR) (MR)
0 200 0 100 - - -
1 200 200 250 250 150 200 MR>MC -50
2 180 360 350 175 100 160 MR>MC +10
3 160 480 420 140 70 120 MR>MC +60
4 140 560 500 125 80 80 MR=MC +60
5 120 600 600 120 100 40 MR<MC 0
6 100 600 720 120 120 0 MR<MC -120
7 80 560 870 120 150 -40 MR<MC -310
Alternatively, if the monopolist fixes the price, the output will be determined accordingly. But, for
profit maximization he adopts the rationale of equating MC with MR and the process of adjustment is
easily described graphically. Anyway, though a pure monopolist has full control over the market supply,
he cannot determine price independently of the market demand for his product. Thus, when equilibrium
output is decided at the point of equality between MC and MR, the price is automatically determined in
relation to the demand for the product. In our illustration, the monopolist will not charge a price higher
than OP, because if he does so, he will not be able to sell OM output.
He would not like to lower the price, either because that will reduce his maximum profit. Thus,
when OP price is charged and OM output is sold, the monopolist obtains a maximum profit, which is
represented by the shared rectangle PABC. This is termed as monopoly profit and it is over and above the
normal profit, which is already estimated in the total costs of the firm. Another important point that must
be observed in the diagram is that the monopolist is in equilibrium on the elastic segment of his demand
curve (the AR curve). Secondly, the monopoly equilibrium output is determined at the falling path of the
AC curve, which means that the monopolist restricts output before producing it at the optimum level of
minimum average cost in order to maximize his profit.
Monopolistic Competition. (Principles of Economics by D.N.Dwivedi Page no.268 and
Perfect competition and pure private monopolies are rare phenomena in the real world.
Monopolistic competition approximates most closely to the real business world. Monopolistic
competition is a market structure in which a large number of sellers sell differentiated products which are
close, but not perfect substitutes for one another. Monopolistic competition combines the characteristics
of perfect competition and monopoly. The important distinguishing characteristics are (a) Product
differentiation (b) Existence of many firms supplying the market, and (c) The goods made by them are
close substitutes. i.e., their product are similar but not identical.
Many examples of monopolistic competition and product differentiation can be cited. Many firms
in India produce toothpaste, but the product of each differs from its rivals in one or more respects.
Different toothpaste like Colgate, Pepsodent, Close-up, Babul etc provides example of monopolistic
competition.
Another example of monopolistic competition consumer knows for sure the difference between
different brands of mobile phones Nokia, Samsung, Sony, Reliance, LG, etc. Since each firm produces a
product distinguishable from that of other firms, each firm holds a monopoly power over its own
products. Although products are differentiated, they remain a close substitute for one another. This creates
condition for competition among the firms which are monopolists in their own rights. This kind of
competition is the genesis of monopolistic competition.
Monopolistic competition, as the term suggest, entails the attributes of both monopoly and pure
competition. The following are the main features of monopolistic competition.
6. Perfect Knowledge. (Economics for Managerial Decisions by K.M.Pandey and M. Pandey. Page no 174)
All sellers and buyers are aware of all current opportunities. Onces knowledge of what others are doing
is sufficient to prevent him from taking a lower or paying a higher price than what are doing. It is true for
both the finished goods as well as the factors of production.
7. Rational Behaviour. (Economics for Managerial Decisions by K.M.Pandey and M. Pandey. Page no 174)
All buyers behave in the manner that maximizes their utilities (i.e., satisfactions) and all sellers behave to
maximize their profits. In other words, both the parties are aware of their own interests and try to
maximize them.
8. Non price competition. (Industrial Economics & Management by S.P.Singh. Page no. 89)
Through non price competition firms in the market try to win over customers. There are many methods of
competing rivals other than price cutting such as guarantee for repairs with a particular time, after sales
service, a gift scheme with particular purchases, a discount not declared in the price list or transport free
of cost etc. All these methods are secrete ways of attracting customers to particular brands.
(Managerial Economics by R.Cauvery. Page no. 217) and (Economics for Managers by ICFAI. Page no 107)
Oligopoly is a situation where there are few firms producing a product. The word oligopoly originates
from the Greek word Oligos meaning few and the Latin word Polis meaning Seller. The product sold
by the firms may be homogeneous or differentiated.
Oligopoly is a form of imperfect competition in which a few firms produce either a homogeneous product
or products which are close but not perfect substitutes for each other. This kind of market structure has a
small number of large producers. The number of firms may vary from two to ten firms. A market in which
there are only two players is called a duopoly.
Oligopoly is a situation in which few large firms compete against each other and there is an element of
interdependence in the decision making of these firms. A policy change on the part of one firm will have
immediate effects on competitors, who react with their counter policies.
Definition: Competition among the few - Feller
Example: In auto mobile industry, Marutis Alto, Hyudais Santro, Daewoos Matiz, Fiats Palio and
Tatas Indica, etc., are the outstanding examples of differentiated oligopoly. Similarly cooking gas of
Bharat, Hindustan Petroleum(HP) and Indane are the example of homogeneous oligopoly.
Features/Characteristics/Conditions of Oligopoly:
1. Small numbers of Large sellers. (Economics for Managers by V.G.Mankar. page no 377)
There are small numbers of large sellers supplying either homogeneous products or differentiated
products.
4. Monopoly element.
As products are differentiated the firms enjoy some monopoly power. Further, when firms collude with
each other they can work together to raise the price and earn some monopoly income.
5. Advertising.
The only way open to the oligopolists to raise his sales is either by advertising or improving the quality of
the product. Advertisement expenditure is used as an effective tool to shift the demand in favour of the
product. Quality improvement will also shift the demand favorably. Usually, both advertisements as well
as variation in designs and quality are used simultaneously to maintain and increase the market share of
an oligopolist.
7. Constant Struggle.
Competition is of unique type in an oligopolistic market. Here, competitions consist of constant struggle
of rivals against rivals.
8. Lack of Uniformity.
Lack of uniformity in the size of different oligopolies is also a remarkable characteristic.
Price Determination under Oligopoly. (Business Economics by V.G.Mankar. Page no. 314)
Due to indeterminate nature of demand curves of oligopoly there is no single and simple solution to the
price determination problem under oligopoly. This is due to uncertainty regarding the reactions of the
rivals to any move by an individual firm.
Again the objective of the firm in an oligopoly situation may not necessarily be profit maximization. Prof.
Rothschild says that an oligopolists objective in price output fixation is maximizing security or achieving
reasonable amount of profit over a long period of time. According to Prof. Boumal, it is maximizing of
sales which is an objective of an oligopolist.
It is for these reasons, viz., indeterminancy of demand curve and variety of objectives, that there is no
single determinate solution of the oligopoly price problem. There are many possible solutions. We may
discuss here a few of them.
After indulging in price-war and cut-throat competition, the firms in oligopoly may reach an express or
implied agreement on a common price policy to be followed by all. They realize after the experience that
such price war is against their collective and individual interest. By pulling together, they would like to
promote the interest of all in the group. This pulling together and entering into a formal agreement is
known as a Cartel. A Cartel originally refers to a common sales agency, undertaking selling operations
of all the firms in a group selling and identical or similar (i.e., differentiated product). A Cartel in its
present form is defined as a group of firms that coordinate their activities in order to maximize the total
profits of the group.
The Game Theory Model. (Business Economics by V.G.Mankar. Page no. 323)
The theory of games model is developed by Prof. Von Neumann and Morgenstern. An industrial firm
under oligopoly has to select a rational course of action assuming possible reaction of its rivals, which in
return would affect itself. The firm has to prepare its own strategies as regards (i) the price variation, (ii)
changing quality of the product and (iii) Expanding promotional expenditure, such as on advertisement,
exhibition displays, home to home canvassing, and etc. Then the likely strategies of the other firms are to
be prepared. Then with the help of a matrix is showing respective profits resulting from the strategies to
firm A and other firm B (in a two firm model) is prepared. Then firm A will find out various alternatives
which would give minimum gain to the firm. It will choose the one which maximum among the minimum
gains. This is the policy of Playing it safe. The outcome of the gain is only known at the end of the
game.
Critically speaking, the game theory assumes that the firm is pessimistic and wants to play safe in the
game. It is assumed that the rival firm will follow the worst strategy as a reaction. This is questioned by
many economists. This will not apply to a dynamic businessman who may like to take risk and get as
much profit as possible.
Secondly, the game theory assumes the advance knowledge of the strategies open to the firm and other
rival firms. But this is not realistic. The real world is full of uncertainties.
Depreciation.
The word depreciation is derived from the Latin word depretium where de means reduce, and
pretium means price. Thus, literally the term stands for a decrease in the value of fixed or capital assets.
With proper care and maintenance we can keep a machine or equipment in a good running condition.
However, we cannot stop its wear and tear which is bound to occur. After a lapse of time, the efficiency of
that machine or equipment is reduced to such a great extent that it becomes uneconomical to be used
further and needs replacement by another unit. This process by which the efficiency and value of machine
or any other assets goes on reducing with lapse of time, during use, is known as depreciation.
Definition.
In practice, the term depreciation is commonly used in a very wide sense covering diminution in the
value of the assets caused by outside fluctuations in realizable and replacement values, and also
amortization in the cost of assets over the period of its use.
- De Paula
Objectives:
The various objectives in recording depreciation on building, plant and equipment cost revenue are as at
follows:
Because so many factors need to be considered in arriving at the annual figure of depreciation, no one
single system or method could be prescribed. A variety of methods of allocating depreciation expense
have been employed over the years, and these are discussed and illustrated below:
Then,
D = C S Rupees
If the original cost of machinery is Rs. 1,00,000 and its salvage value is Rs. 20,000 after a useful life of 5
years. The annual depreciation cost will come to Rs.
S = 1,00,000 20,000
= 80,000
= Rs. 16,000
Under this method, a fairly high rate of depreciation is to be fixed, so as to reduce the assets account to nil
or to its break-up value. The method is usually applied in case of plant and machinery, furniture and
fixtures, etc., and is probably most popular among businessmen. Its chief advantage is that the revenue
charge is equitably averaged over by year.
The equation for calculating the rate of depreciation charges under the sinking fund method is:
D = R (C - S)
(1 + R)n 1
S = Scrap value.
= 20,000
= 20 * 4,000
= 80,000 hours
80,000
= 25 paisa/hour
5+4+3+2+1 = 15
If the cost of a machine is Rs. 20,000 and its scrap value is Rs 5,000 the depreciation charges for
each year of its estimated life of 5 year, would be as here under:
15
15
15
15
15