Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GOVERNANCE AND
LEGISLATION
Governance structure for SWM
MPOB
MRB 7
Commodity Waste MPB ministrie
MPIC
/ Biomass s
MTIB
MCB
involved
Jathropa
Waste / Timber/Wood
Waste NRE/ FRIM/
Resources Hazardous /
MPIC MTIB
Schedule Waste
NRE DOE
(solid and liquid)
incl. mining
Medical / Clinical NRE
Waste (MOH)
Construction/ SWCorp
KPKT JPSPN
Demolition Waste CIDB
Sewerage Sludge KeTTHA IWK
Multiple agencies governing waste there is no existing platform for overall waste Total
governance N/A
funding
Multiple agencies & mandates many ministries involved and unclear coordination
Grey areas exist in definition of some wastes and governing bodies
There are no clear guidelines on who has authority to divert wastes for capitalization of Outcome
opportunities whilst meeting waste diversion target
Establishment of a waste
Our proposal management platform that meets
regularly to coordinate matters on
Option 1: Set up a new Cabinet Committee Option 2: Leverage on existing Majlis
Teknologi Hijau dan Perubahan Iklim sustainable and holistic waste
(MTHPI) Committee management
Pros:
Perceived high level of commitment and more
Concerns:
Getting all ministers time for meeting may not be as
frequent meetings frequent to address all issues immediately
All ministers onboard, mandate to reconcile There is already an existing ministerial level committee
becomes easier Majlis Teknologi Hijau dan Perubahan Iklim (MTHPI)
Planning and budget all under KPKT How to consolidate all budget under one ministry -
Distribution of budget amongst multiple ministries may be
tricky
Multiple areas secretariatship is questionable
OVERALL WASTE GOVERNANCE OPTION 2
Option 2: Leverage on MTHPI as a mediating platform add one
more working committee for waste (become MTHPIS)
Pros:
Existing committee, just add one category (Sisa) Concerns:
Frequency of decision-making meeting only
Leverage on existing work already
once a year
commissioned by KeTTHA, KPKT, MPIC and
Execution and implementation of post-
MIGHT
decisions (cross-ministry) may be difficult
Involvement of multiple ministries (14), a good
Budget for implementation (especially cross-
platform for open communication
ministry) may be tricky
Technical Committee already up and running with
proposed programs
Secretariat
JPM (Bhg Kabinet)
Pros:
Frequent meeting (weekly) if there are
Concerns:
Execution and implementation of post-
cross-ministry issues to be resolved decisions (cross-ministry) may be difficult
It will be a high level committee addressing Budget for implementation (especially
the issues cross-ministry) may be tricky
Fast decision-making and fast
implementation
OVERALL WASTE GOVERNANCE OPTION 4
Option 4: Park total waste management under one Ministry (Long
Term Plan)
One Ministry
Municipal Construction/ Agriculture Commodity Timber/ Hazardous/ Medical/ Sewerage Landscap- Hazard/
Solid Waste Demolition Waste Waste/ Wood Scheduled Clinical Sludge ing disaster
Waste Biomass Waste Waste Waste Waste debris
KPKT KPKT MOA MPIC MNRE/MPIC MNRE NRE (MOH) KeTTHA PBTs ??
xxx : current ministry
This Ministry should also govern the following activities in order to meet the
objectives of ease of governance, monitoring, implementation and enforcement:
Natural resources management
Forest management
Irrigation and drainage management
Biodiversity and marine management
Land
Climate change
Disaster risk reduction, preparedness and response
Sustainable technology
Environmental conservation and management
OVERALL WASTE GOVERNANCE OPTION 4
Option 4: Park total waste management under one Ministry
Below is a list of countries that park all matters related to environment (including
waste) under one ministry for ease of governing, monitoring, implementation
and enforcement.
NO. COUNTRY DIVISION/MINISTRY JURISDICTION
Waste Management and Recycling Department, Covers global environment, air, transport, health, water,
1. Japan
Ministry of the Environment soil, ground, park and waste.
Department of Environment, Food and Rural
2. England Covers environmental, food and rural issues.
Affairs (DEFRA)
Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Danish Covers agriculture, air, chemical, industry, noise,
3. Denmark
Ministry of the Environment sustainability and waste.
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Covers almost all matters relating to environment except
4. USA
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) under other federal, tribal, state or local agencies.
New Covers air, climate change, fresh water, marine, land, RMA
5. Ministry for the Environment
Zealand and waste.
National Environment Agency, Ministry of Covers public health, environmental protection, waste and
6. Singapore
Environment and Water Resources meteorological services.
Covers water, sewerage, biodiversity, natural resources,
South Resources Recirculation Bureau, Ministry of
7. waste, environmental industry, environmental technology,
Korea Environment
health, climate, chemical, air, transport.
Pollution Control Department, Ministry of
8. Thailand
Natural Resources and Environment
9. Indonesia Environment and Forestry Ministry
STATE LEVEL SOLID WASTE & PUBLIC CLEANSING (SWPC)
GOVERNANCE OPTION 5
Option 5: State Secretary heads a committee for SWPC that
involves all agencies at state level providing related services to
SWPC
Pros:
SWPC to be addressed at state level
Concerns:
Budget for implementation
monthly Human resources (the necessary
It will be a high level committee expertise) and technical support for
addressing the issues at state level implementation
Fast decision-making and fast
implementation at state level
Governance structure for SWM
Legislations - Drafting
1. Regulations schemes for construction and demolition waste
Peraturan-Peraturan Sisa Pepejal Dan Pembersihan Awam (Skim Bagi Sisa Pepejal Pembinaan) 2015
3. Regulations on standards and specification for the design, construction, operation and maintenance of
sanitary landfill
4. Regulations on standards and specification for the design, construction, operation and maintenance of
thermal treatment facility
5. Regulations on standards and specification for the design, construction, operation and maintenance of MRF
6. Regulations on standards and specification for the design, construction, operation and maintenance of
transfer station
7. Regulations on standards and specification for the design, construction, operation and maintenance of
composing facility
8. Regulations on storage sites (for all types of wastes e.g. imported waste, recyclables etc.)
12. Regulations on extended producer responsibilities (buy back/ take back/ deposit refund system)
13. Regulations for Industrial Waste Disposal (to confirm with Regulations on schemes for business waste
commercial and industry)
15. Regulations on packaging (design, eco-labelling, % of recycled material and % recyclable material)
ORDER
16. Order on method or manner and level of recycling by any prescribed solid waste management facilities
17. Order on controlled solid waste to be recycled and the duty of any person to separate recyclable solid
waste
Proposed new policies to support all SWM planning and implementation
Low
CONSTUCTION &
DEMOLITION WASTE Policy Priority
IBS/modular Medium
Secondary material Medium
Planning & Design Stage
Recycling Medium
Construction Stage