Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scott Foden
Professor Hoffmann
Intellectual Traditions
February 2, 2016
Even though cities and urban areas take up less than three percent of land throughout the
United States, over seventy five percent of Americans live in or around the city (Cox). Cities
have been growing ever since America was founded, but towns still occupy far more land than
cities. With cities constantly on the rise and more people leaving small towns every year, it
seemed reasonable to look at the symbiotic relationship between towns and cities. First off, what
population, or importance, than a town or village. For this paper, places will be considered cities
if the state considers them to be a city or if the village/borough is within a city. As for towns,
places that will be considered towns are places that the state considers to be a hamlet, village, or
town. Even though villages and hamlets are technically different from towns, it seemed
reasonable to put both hamlets and villages into the same category as towns because hamlets and
villages are smaller than towns. The goal of viewing this symbiotic relationship is to show the
importance of small rural towns. Even though cities are constantly on the rise, factors such as
land, and lower level education help show why small towns are critical for the development of
large metropolitan cities. Towns may have less appeal to Americans, but rural towns are essential
To show the symbiotic relationship between cities and towns, I decided to focus on some
of the biggest global cities within America. The paper will mostly consist of facts from the cities
of Boston, New York City, Los Angeles, and Chicago. These cities are considered to be some of
the biggest cities in America, with New York City having a population of approximately eight
Foden 2
million and Los Angeles having a population of about four million. Chicago also has a
population of three million while Boston has a population of about seven hundred thousand
(Largest Cities in the United States by Population). Even though these cities are extremely
populated, they also are defined as global cities. New York City is home to the world's largest
stock exchange and is also home to the most college students compared to any other city, well
Boston has the largest medical research programs in the country. Overall, these cities are some of
the most influential places in America, so it deemed essential to observe these cities and the
The first factor that I decided to look at is land and real estate. Large metropolitan cities
are some of the most expensive places in the world and it is almost impossible to get a cheap
place somewhere. In a place like Boston, on average, someone with a million dollars can buy
about 2092 square feet and in New York City and Los Angeles a million dollars can buy someone
about 2300 square feet (Kiersz). After looking at these prices I researched the average price for a
square foot in nearby towns close to these cities. After doing the calculations, a million dollars
can get someone over double the square feet they can get in the city. In the town I grew up in
which is twenty minutes away from Boston, a million dollars can buy someone on average 4500
square feet and towns fifteen minutes away from Boston such as Danvers and Beverly people
can buy about 4000 square feet. New York had even more of a drastic difference between real
estate prices. In the town West Milford, NJ which is only forty minutes away from the city,
people can get 8850 square feet of land with a million dollars and in Huntington, NY people can
get 6100 square feet of land. Even though some people can afford to live in the city, many people
do not have the money to buy an apartment or pay rent in the city. Also, even if someone can buy
an apartment in the city, in places such as Boston or New York people sometimes have to pay a
Foden 3
couple hundred dollars a month to park their car. With nearby towns offering cheaper
opportunities for housing it gives people the opportunity to work in the city while living away
Even though towns help cities with land and real estate, cities are essential for people that
live in towns and want to work. In cities throughout America, over a hundred thousand people
commute into the city every single weekday for work. Boston, New York, and Los Angeles are
considered to be the worst cities in America for commuting. On any given weekday,
approximately 787,000 people commute to Boston (Conti), 608,000 people commute to New
York City(Roberts), and 471,000 people commute to Los Angeles (471,000 Workers Commute
into Los Angeles County, Calif., Each Day). With that many people driving into the city every
single day, it is clear why cities are essential for towns. Cities employ hundreds of thousands of
people and are also essential for large companies. World-wide companies such as International
Business Machines (IBM) and Pepsi have their headquarters in New York City and companies
such as Walgreens and Boeing have their headquarters in Chicago, Illinois. With large companies
such as these ones employing over thousands of people, it is essential for their headquarters to be
at a common meeting place that everyone can make it to. Even though commuting to the city is
considered to be one of the worst experiences in the world, cities help to employ the people that
Another large aspect of the relationship between towns and cities is education. In almost
every town in America, a lower level school can be found such as an elementary, middle school,
or high school. Towns are perfect for children that are learning the basics to education and are
learning grades one through twelve. Towns help children get the ground basis for education
because the schools are close to the students so they can live at home while in school. Although,
Foden 4
cities are essential for students when it comes to post-secondary education. With post-secondary
education becoming more common, it is more essential that colleges lie in the cities. After
graduating from high school, people find more specific schools that relate to the career they want
to pursue and that is why colleges in the city are essential so that way it is a place everyone can
get to. To test out this statement, I decided to track the amount of colleges in cities compared to
towns in states such as Illinois, New York, and Massachusetts and found that colleges were far
more prevalent in cities compared to towns. After researching where every college is in the state
of Illinois I found out that seventy-six colleges were in the city while twenty-one colleges were
in towns. That means that seventy-eight percent of colleges within the state of Illinois were in
cities instead of towns. Boston and New York shared similar statistics as well. Out of the one
hundred twenty-two colleges that I tracked in Massachusetts, about seventy percent of colleges
lied in cities. New York has one hundred and nineteen colleges in cities compared to the fifty-
eight that are in towns. Also, New York City single handedly holds over fifty colleges. After
looking at this information, it is clear why both towns and cities are essential for educational
purposes. Towns are the easiest way for students to receive lower forms of education. With
generally an easy commute and public transportation provided by public schools, it is reasonable
why students should get their lower education in local towns. Although, once students have to
pursue a specific pathway and career, cities give students the opportunity to pursue the career of
their choosing.
The last feature that I studied closely is farming throughout towns and cities. To find out
where farms were in certain states I attempted to search throughout Google Maps finding all of
the farms in certain states. Even though all of the farms did not appear, the farms that sold their
food at their own farm tended to appear. The first state that was investigated was Massachusetts,
Foden 5
and the statistics helped prove that towns are essential. I recorded twenty major farms in the state
of Massachusetts and a hundred percent of those farms lied in towns instead of cities. In Illinois,
I only counted twenty major farms as well but over sixty five percent of the farms lied in towns.
Towns are essential for farmers to grow their crops, especially in a place such as Illinois which is
the leading producer of corn, soybeans, and swine. The land in which farmers grow crops on is
After looking at the facts, it is clear why urbanization is not always a good thing. There
are negative factors that people think of when it comes to urbanization such as pollution,
violence, and physical inactivity, but people also seem to forget that urbanization leads to a
decrease in rural towns, which is something that is essential to America. Without town's, people
that could not afford to live in urban areas would have nowhere to live at a cheap price. Also,
food would not be able to be grown in large proportions at a cheap price and fresh and local food
would be harder to access. Towns and cities share an incredibly strong symbiotic relationship,
and even though urbanization is always on the rise, rural towns is what keeps cities alive and
successful.
Works Cited
471,000 Workers Commute into Los Angeles County, Calif., Each Day." The United States
Cox, Wendell. "How Much of the World Is Covered by Cities?" How Much of the World Is
Kiersz, Andy. "Here's How Much Real Estate A Million Dollars Buys You In Every Major US
City." Business Insider. Business Insider, 11 Mar. 2014. Web. 02 Feb. 2017.
Largest Cities in the United States by Population." Ballotpedia. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Feb. 2017.