Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Very Respectfully,
1
For Educational Purposes Only
FOR
Dr. Heidi Gurdo, Ed.D, MArch
Prepared By:
Capstone Consulting
400 Stanton-Christiana Road
Newark DE, 19703
13, April 2017
2
For Educational Purposes Only
Engineering
Report
FOR
Lums Pond Campground
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Table of Contents
Sections
1.0 INTRODUCTION
3
For Educational Purposes Only
5.0 OUTFALLS
5.1 Pipe Flow
8.0 Conclusion
9.0 References
Appendix A
Ratio of Peak Hourly Flow to Design Average Flow, figure 6.0
Appendix B
Plan view of the Treatment Plant
Appendix C
Profile view of the Treatment Plant
4
For Educational Purposes Only
ENGINEERING REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
5
For Educational Purposes Only
The model that Capstone Consulting 2017 has chosen that shall best
suit your proposed sites needs is the Model R Oxigest Wastewater
Treatment System by Smith and Loveless. This treatment is the best option
for the site because it is a packaged plant and it comes with all the required
components. A package plant was determined to be the best option for this
site, rather than a septic or land application due to the soils on the property.
The soils on the property are frequently flooded within the specific area that
effluent will be discharged.The proposed stormwater management plan set
forth by Capstone Consulting 2017s Civil and Environmental Engineering
department will aim the stormwater towards the southwest side of the
property to account for flooding and stormwater management in this area.
A packaged plant was chosen over septic because the soils are not
suitable for septic. Septic tanks are buried underground tend to leach out
effluence over time which may cause groundwater contamination. Septics
also empty into drainfields which may be effective for some time, however
they ultimately collect toxins such as chemical additives, heavy metals,
fats, oils, greases, paints, and paint thinners. Theses toxins may eventually
render the drainfield ineffective and may provide further risk of
contamination (Simply Septics,DNREC 1996). This plant shall be
designed to treat the water above ground and then discharge treated
effluents back into the canal. With this design, water is already treated to a
specific standard before going back into the environment and the surface-
water body of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. The specific standard
that the treated water shall adhere to is the pre-existing National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for the Lums Pond and
Chesapeake and Delaware Canal watersheds.
6
For Educational Purposes Only
The plant is also field-erected, meaning the contractor will bring in the
parts and build it on-site. A pump station equipped with a will be provided
by the manufacturer Smith and Loveless. There will also be a fence
included to surround the perimeter of the plant in order to keep tenants and
small children at a distance during operator adjusting times. The system
removes biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids
(TSS), nitrogen, phosphorus and or potassium (NPK), or total potassium
and nitrogen (TKN) and phosphorus and nutrients. It also requires minimal
maintenance. There is an existing permit at the current Lums Pond
Wastewater Treatment Facility that sets the limitations of the quality of
effluent being discharged into the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. For
good engineering practice, it is recommended that two operators, rotating
between a nine to five schedule, check the effluent levels and keep them in
a record log on a bi-weekly basis, as well as work within the standard
procedures within an operation and maintenance plan to ensure general
upkeep of the facility.
According to the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and
Environmental Control (DNREC), the permittee must take all steps
necessary to minimize any adverse impact to the Waters of the State which
may potentially result from operation under the issued permit. In order to
operate under the limitations of an issued permit and ensure that there is
minimal adverse impact, it is required that an Operation and Maintenance
Plan (O&M Plan) be submitted to the department (DNREC) for review
following the construction of the wastewater treatment facility. The general
requirements for the O&M plan may be found under section 6.7.2.2.1 of the
State of Delaware Regulations Governing the Design, Installation and
operation of On-site Wastewater Treatment Facilities and Disposal systems
on the DNREC website. The Model R Oxigest system has been chosen
because the treated effluent from the model will minimize adverse impact to
the waters, and the system will meet the limitations and requirements
specified by the existing National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit.
7
For Educational Purposes Only
The proposed service area for the wastewater treatment facility is the
proposed Smart Growth community to be developed on the Lums Pond
State Park Campground Property, located at 1060 Howell school Rd, Bear
DE 19701, tax parcel #11-047.00-005, Deed Record E-126-247.
Population in units for the proposed community and converted to
gallons per day (GPD) is displayed by the table and figures below, figure
1.0a, set forth by the Capstone 2017 Civil and Environmental Engineering
Technology Departments:
8
For Educational Purposes Only
(GPD) (GPD)
Single Family 87 # of 3 100 26,100
Homes Houses
Townhomes 63 # of 3 100 18,900
Houses
Apartments 30 # of 3 100 9,000
Houses
School/College 1 # of 100 15 1,500
Buildings
Commercial 11,500 Square 0 0.2 2,300
Feet
Average 57,800
Hydraulic Load
GPD stands for gallons per day. The total volume of water coming
into the wastewater treatment plant is approximately 57,800 Gallons Per
Day. The calculations as to how this total was reached are as follows:
An average use of 100 gallons per person per day was determined.
This average use is defined by the 10 State Standards Great Lakes Upper
Mississippi River Board Recommended Standards for Wastewater
Facilities. This decision was determined based upon the fact that the 100
gallons of wastewater per person day is more stringent for calculation
purposes, than the gallons per day based upon dwelling units by building
9
For Educational Purposes Only
type as defined by the New Castle County sewer use design flows. ( New
Castle County, Sewer, July 2007).
Since there are 87 single family homes, each with 3 occupants, at a
design rate of wastewater usage of 100 gallons per person per day, this
results in an average volume of 26,100 gallons per day (GPD). There are
63 townhomes, each holding 3 occupants, with an average use of 100
gallons of wastewater per person per day. This results in an average
volume of 18,900 GPD. For the apartments, there are 30, with 3 occupants
per apartment, and an average use of 100 gallons of wastewater per
person per day. This results in an an average volume of 9,000 GPD. There
is only 1 proposed school/college for the site, with 100 occupants and an
average use of 15 gallons of wastewater per person per day. This will result
in an average volume of 1,500 GPD for the school/college. There are also
proposed commercial buildings for the site.
The Civil Engineers of Capstone Consulting 2017 have proposed that
an area of 11,500 square feet will be taken up on the site for commercial
use. A factor of 0.2 is used to calculate the average daily volume of flow
coming from proposed commercial buildings on the site which shall result in
an average volume of 2,300 GPD. This is based upon building type so the
calculation came from the New Castle County sewer use design flows
(New Castle County Delaware, Sewer, July, 2007).
In summary, the total average volume of influent waste; or waste
coming into the plant, calculated based upon the predicted average flow
volumes for each type of dwelling; is 57,800 Gallons Per Day.
10
For Educational Purposes Only
predicted amount, the plant will have flow equalization for excess flow
storage and will regulate the excess flow. It has been determined that the
ratio for the proposed plant is approximately 4:1. According to the
recommendations from the 10 State Standards Recommended Standards
for Wastewater Facilities, flow equalization is recommended when the ratio
is greater than 3:1; If the ratio of design peak hourly flow to design
average flow is 3:1 or more, flow equalization shall be considered. This
may be accomplished by either building a wet weather retention basin and
gradually returning the excess flow to the treatment plant during off-peak
periods or by providing a plant large enough to handle all
flows.(Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities,2014, p.15).
This flow equalization included in the design will be the basin accounting
for peak flows, as well as times of lesser flow, so that the pumps being
used dont become overworked or damaged.
The pumping rate shall be infinitely adjustable between these limits
and shall be adjusted by a throttling valve in the air supply line. All openings
and passages shall be large enough to permit the passage of a sphere 3"
(75 mm) in diameter. S&L MULTIFUSER diffuser(s) shall be provided and
all necessary air control valves(S & L).
11
For Educational Purposes Only
TSS stands for total suspended solids. Total suspended solids are
simply the solid materials of the influent that do not settle out to the bottom
of the settling tanks during the wastewater treatment process.
The following are tables which were used to calculated the total
average influents that will be coming into the plant from the residents:
Figure 1.2a shows Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) influent. Figure
1.2b shows Total Suspended Solids influent. Figure 1.2c shows Nitrogen
influent, and figure 1.2d shows Phosphorus influent.
12
For Educational Purposes Only
13
For Educational Purposes Only
numbe
r of
(lbs/person/ Townhome house
100 47.25 299.2 0.25 day) s 63 s 3
numbe
r of
(lbs/person/ house
100 22.5 299.2 0.25 day) Apartments 30 s 3
numbe
r of
(lbs/person/ buildin
15 25 359.04 0.25 day) College 1 gs 100
(lbs/person/ 1150
0.2 4.61 240 0.25 day) Com. 0 sq ft 0
total=144.11 total=299.2
Figure 1.2b Total Suspended Solids influent.
Nitrogen Nitrogen
Waste Concentrations Concentration Loading Buildng # of Unit of Number
(GPD) (lbs/day) (mg/l) Rates Units Desciption Units Measure of People
(lbs/person Single Family
100 12 55.05 0.046 /day) Homes 87 #houses 3
(lbs/person
100 8.69 55.05 0.046 /day) Townhomes 63 # house 3
100 4.14 55.05 0.046 (lbs/person Apartments 30 number 3
14
For Educational Purposes Only
of
/day) houses
College
(lbs/person/day)b
ased on
Wastewater N% number
recommendation of
15 0.828 66.06 .046*.18 from H&H book 1 buildings 100
Commercial
(lbs/person/day)b
ased on
Wastewater N%
recommendation 1150 sq ft of
0.2 0.673 35 .046*.18 from H&H book 0 building 0
total=26.33 total=53.85
Figure 1.2c Nitrogen influent.
15
For Educational Purposes Only
number
of
100 0.57 7.6 Apartments 30 houses 3
number
of
building
15 0.095 7.6 College 1 s 100
0.2 0.15 7.6 Commercial 11500 sq ft 0
total=3.68 total=7.61
Figure 1.2d Phosphorus influent.
The effluent that the manufacturer provided Capstone Consulting 2017 with
was in milligrams per Liter or mg/L. To be sure that the effluent meets the
standard in pounds per day the universal loading equation from Hammer &
16
For Educational Purposes Only
Hammer was used to convert into pounds per day. (Water and
Wastewater, 2012).
The universal loading equation is the total flow in Million Gallons per
Day (MGD), Multiplied by the effluent in milligrams per Liter, multiplied by a
constant of 8.34.
Effluent standards to meet based upon the effluent limitations that the
lums pond sub watershed and the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal can
handle according to the Delaware Department Natural Resources and
Environmental Control and the existing National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System ( NPDES) permit for the watershed:
BOD: 13 lbs/day
TSS: 26 lbs/day
Nitrogen: 9 lbs/day
Phosphorus: 2 lbs/day
17
For Educational Purposes Only
Characteristics summary
The plant shall adhere to all requirements set forth by the National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and the effluent may be
discharged into a water system such as the C&D canal.
Advantages of the Smith & Loveless MODEL R Oxigest System include:
Fine or Coarse bubble diffusers for aeration and odor control purposes
18
For Educational Purposes Only
3.1 General
19
For Educational Purposes Only
3.3.1 Odor
The plant itself will be relatively far away from the residents and odor
from this treatment system is expected to be minimal. The Smith and
Loveless Model R Oxigest system includes an aeration process in which
the final effluent will have no considerable odor. A cap will be placed on the
system by Smith & Loveless in order to eliminate any potential odor issue.
3.3.2 Noise
There will not be significant noise coming from the new treatment
plant. Due to the distance between the location of the facility and the rest
of the residential/commercial development on site, noise will not be a
considerable issue.
20
For Educational Purposes Only
Due to the wastewater entering the facility at five feet below ground a
pump station will need to be implemented in the design. The Smith and
Loveless Model R Oxigest plant is to be constructed above ground to
ensure no stormwater entry into the treatment system. The proposed
design will be constructed in the same area as the existing plant, which is
the the south-east portion of the property. According to the United States
Department of Agriculture's Web Soils Survey, the existing plant location
contains longmarsh and indiantown soil types and is a frequently flooded
area. The proposed stormwater management plan set forth by Capstone
Consulting 2017s Civil and Environmental Engineering department will aim
the stormwater towards the southwest side of the property to account for
flooding and stormwater management in this area. A stormwater
management bioswale and large infiltration basin will be provided on the
southeast end of the site which will cause 100% infiltration of the Resource
protection event, (RPv), as well convey and control stormwater runoff and
potential flooding within the area. Please refer to Capstone Consulting
2017s stormwater management plan for further details.
21
For Educational Purposes Only
3.3.6 Lighting
Lighting at the wastewater treatment plant will be limited to only when
service is needed to ensure no disturbance to nearby residential areas. We
will be following the guidelines for the previous permit on the property.
22
For Educational Purposes Only
Flow meter samplings and reports and documents are the ultimate
responsibility of the Chief Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator. The flow
metering will be controlled by a manual valve and have a body constructed
with tough machined acrylic meter, and highly polished to a clear finish with
a direct reading permanent scale. The float and guide rod shall be
constructed of 316 stainless steel. The F/NPT adaptors shall be
constructed with a high grade Viton-O ring seals and aluminum stress ring
thread supports, and is operable in direct sunlight(Wastewater, 2012).
One recycled flow occurs within the system and is displayed in the
diagram in section 4.8.
23
For Educational Purposes Only
The design average flow is 57,800 gallons of wastewater per day (GPD),
therefore, on average, the plant may handle wastes up to 33,992.71pounds
per day (lbs/day) on average.
This is based on the universal loading equation:
.0578 MGD X 6000 mg/L X 8.34 = 33,992.71 pounds of total waste per day
(lbs/day total).
24
For Educational Purposes Only
The BOD influent that the new plant will have from the residents is 126.64
lbs/day. The effluent will be 12.53 lbs/day. Therefore the removal efficiency
will be 90% or:
(126.64lbs/day-12.53lbs/day)/126.64lbs/day x 100 = 90%
4.5.2 TSS
TSS stands for total suspended solids. Total suspended solids are
simply the solid materials of the influent that do not settle out to the bottom
of the settling tanks during the wastewater treatment process. The TSS
influent that the new plant will have from the residents is 144.11 lbs/day.
The effluent will be 25.5 lbs/day. Therefore the removal efficiency will be
82% or:
(144.11lbs/day-25.5lbs/day)/144.11lbs/day x 100 = 82%
4.5.3 Nitrogen
25
For Educational Purposes Only
4.5.4 Phosphorus
The Phosphorus influent that the new plant will have from the
residents is 3.68 lbs/day. The effluent will be 1.93 lbs/day. Therefore the
removal efficiency will be 45% or:
(3.68lbs/day-1.93 lbs/day)/1.93 lbs/day x 100 = 47%
26
For Educational Purposes Only
A process flow diagram with flow arrows has been provided and shows the
overall process of where the wastewater flows within the system in a linear
fashion. This representation is displayed in figure 6.1
27
For Educational Purposes Only
Minimizing surface area elemental exposure saves heat, and protects the
biological processes occurring in the tank for treatment of the wastewater.
The system comes with electrical operation switches that allow the
operators to control how they want the zones or tanks within the system to
operate. Influent wastewater that is fed into the system flows into a
moderately aerated flow equalization zone for stabilization of flow and
organic loading, before it is sent into one of two anoxic zone tanks. In the
anoxic tanks, the wastewater is mixed with return activated sludge solids
( RAS) through a pipe known as the RAS line. This mixing of the influent
and RAS waste yields short periods of low dissolved oxygen for the
purposes of preventing any undesirable bacteria that may harm to the
tanks or their biological processes.
The influent then passes through the aeration zone. This includes
state-of-the-art air diffusion equipment. This equipment is used for oxygen
transfer, effective mixing, and has minimal energy usage. Diffusion zones
within the system may be adjusted by the operator within the aeration zone
to help optimize treatment. The aeration zone also contains instrumentation
for process monitoring of pH, dissolved oxygen, mixed liquor suspended
solids (MLSS), and temperature levels. This allows the wastewater
treatment operator to easily control the plant from the remote operations
control system that will be included in this plant
28
For Educational Purposes Only
kind of materials within the waste from the population. Smith and Loveless
considers flow equalization, advanced nitrification and or denitrification, and
tertiary treatment when evaluating design models. This is displayed in
figure 2.1a. If you look closely at figure 2.0, you can see that the
recommended model is a combination of all three design considerations. In
the design in figure 2.0, flow equalization is on the end where the influent
comes in, and then the process is followed up by two anoxic tanks included
in this system. The two anoxic tanks provide treatment by biological
processes that aid in the removal of nitrogen. In the tanks, nitrogen is
broken down into nitrate, and then exposed to environment that lacks free
oxygen. Organisms then use the nitrate as an electron acceptor, and
release nitrogen in the form of nitrogen gas or oxides. This process is also
known as denitrification. The flow of wastewater then continues into the
aeration chamber where the waste is aerated. After aeration the
wastewater flows into the clarifier for clarification processes to take place
with chemical treatment. From then on the water continues into a tank
where there is filtration, disinfection, and re-aeration of the wastewater.
After that, the treated water exits the whole system and is discharged into
the Chesapeake and Delaware canal under the permit limitations. The
excess sludge is then sent to the sludge holding tank. The leftover sludge
and grit will be minimal and the client may choose to dispose of it through
the recommended disposal methods discussed in section(s) 3.4 and 4.7 of
this report. The flow design figure of how the wastewater treatment process
will occur is shown in figure 2.0. A sample of how the treatment plant may
look on the site is shown in figure 3.0.
29
For Educational Purposes Only
30
For Educational Purposes Only
31
For Educational Purposes Only
5.0 Outfalls:
32
For Educational Purposes Only
a chart that refers to calculating the ratio of peak hourly flow to design
daily average flow.
The current pipe size does not meet the 10 State Standards
Recommendations for pipe size. For this reason, Capstone Consulting
2017 recommends that the outfall sewer shall be modified to meet the
standard. The discharge pipe to the receiving stream at the same location
of the existing outfall location (C and D canal) will be decreased to a
diameter to 3.0 inches for nominal pipe size. This decrease will create a
flow of 2.16 feet per second and will be within the recommended standard
for pipe size and pipe flow.
Calculation:
Q= .108cfs
A=.05
V required=2.0 feet per second
33
For Educational Purposes Only
Q/A=V,
.108cfs/.05 square feet= 2.16 feet per second.
Capstone Consulting recommends that a topological berm or fill of
grade be provided to allow a form of cascade aeration to take effect and
take place before effluents reach the final body of water. This is much like a
miniature waterfall; as the water trickles down the grade and through
vegetation and soil before entering the stream, to allow for an increase in
dissolved oxygen. This will achieve a form of limited cross-stream
dispersion in order to protect aquatic life movement, wildlife, and growth
within the immediate area of the receiving stream.
Summary of Outfalls
34
For Educational Purposes Only
discharge pipe is below the frost line. Capstone Consulting 2017 highly
recommends that the same depth of the discharge pipe currently on site be
used for the newly installed discharge pipe to ensure that the effluent does
not freeze over or provide any other technical liabilities.
35
For Educational Purposes Only
36
For Educational Purposes Only
Land Use
Topography
Wetlands
There are no wetlands within the project area that would be affected
by the proposed wastewater treatment system as demonstrated in the
following figure,
37
For Educational Purposes Only
(National Wetlands Inventory, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service November 2016)
The soil on site is a mixture of sand and clay. Overall the soil on site
is a mixture of acidic and alkaline with the majority being acidic.
The soil of the area on site where the waste water treatment system
is proposed to be built on is of Longmarsh and Indiantown soils (frequently
flooded) with a soil infiltration rate of 600 micrometers per second.
Longmarsh and Indiantown soils have a hydrologic rating of B/D from the
38
For Educational Purposes Only
Due to these soils having a high potential for runoff and flooding,
there is a recommend a stormwater management facility slightly west of
this area to protect the wastewater treatment plant. A large bioswale, as
well as an infiltration has been included to infiltrate 100% of the runoff from
rain and stormwater. This is also one of the main reasons a package plant
is highly recommended over a land application or septic; because the soils
are not suitable for septic.
39
For Educational Purposes Only
40
For Educational Purposes Only
Evapotranspiration systems were looked into. They are not the best
option because they are subject to climate and weather patterns, and they
also require a significant amount of land coverage.
41
For Educational Purposes Only
Tying into the New Castle County sewer system makes sense, but
the tie in to the sewer system is very far on the other side of the Lums Pond
State park and would be prohibitively expensive.
8.0 Conclusion
Capstone Consulting 2017 has chosen the Smith and Loveless Model
R Oxigest packaged plant as the new wastewater treatment system for this
site.The proposed Smart Growth community is expected to produce an
average of 57,800 gallons of wastewater per day (GPD). With the
installation of flow equalization, the plant may handle up to 207,200 GPD
before overflow on peak flow days due to the safety factor. This treatment
system will be able to properly treat all influent from the community and
adhere to the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and
Environmental Controls (DNREC) environmental standards and limitations
for wastewater effluent disposal into the Chesapeake and Delaware canal
watershed. According to Capstone Consulting 2017s final research
findings, the Smith and Loveless Model R Oxigest wastewater treatment
facility is the best option for the proposed Smart Growth community over
other wastewater treatment applications and technologies. This is because
the model R Oxigest system will only be 40 feet, 4 inches in diameter
therefore, taking up a very small amount of land space. Preserving land
area will allow preservation of the existing habitats within the area as well
as contribute to the ideals of the new Smart Growth community by
providing an educational opportunity for its tenants.
42
For Educational Purposes Only
9.0 References
43
For Educational Purposes Only
from :https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?
url=https://owl.english.purdue.edu/media/pdf/20110928111055_949.pdf
44
For Educational Purposes Only
45
For Educational Purposes Only
Appendix A
46
For Educational Purposes Only
Appendix B
47
For Educational Purposes Only
Appendix C
48
For Educational Purposes Only
49