Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Braulio Romero
Professor Collins
ENGL 1301
1 April 2017
Gun Control
In recent years gun violence has made gun control a topic of debate among supporters and
opponents of gun control, and like any argument there are two perspectives of the issue. On one
side there are citizens that believe guns should be more strictly regulated, but even on this side
there are two sides of the spectrum. There are some that want more thorough background checks
and more strict regulations on the type of weapons and ammunition that should be available to
civilians. On the other side there are those who advocate for a complete ban on guns. Both sides
have a common goal, to bring an end to the gun violence in the United States. William J.
Vizzard, author of The Current and Future State of Gun Policy in the United States explains
how the Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed in response to the assassinations of President John
F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King. This is just an example of how gun laws have been put in
place in response to gun related crime. Mainly, opponents are against gun laws because they
violate the rights protected by the Second Amendment of the Constitution. While most lawful
gun owners have no problem with the current regulations, there is a negative view on completely
banning all guns. The second issue is the regulations on what kind of weapons and ammunitions
that should be allowed to the public. Gun control has become a prominent topic of debate
because more gun laws are viewed by some citizens as the answer to gun violence, and other
Supporters of gun control suggest that more stern laws and regulations will resolve gun
violence. There are a number of regulations set in place when it comes to buying guns and they
vary state to state. Federal law states that only licensed dealers are required to conduct a
background check, however this is not enough to prevent gun violence. According to ProCon.org
between 1999 2013 a total of 464,033 deaths were gun related. 9,983 were homicides making
guns the leading cause of all homicides (66.6%). More comprehensive background checks when
purchasing guns and restrictions on certain ammunition would greatly decrease the chances of
guns ending up in the wrong hands. Supporters of gun control laws believe that more gun control
Other advocates of gun control believe that it takes more than just restrictions on gun
transactions to completely stop gun violence because federal law does not require private
individuals to conduct background checks. Under the Gun Control Act of 1968, private sellers
were defined as any individual that sold no more than four guns per year (William J Vizzard).
However, in 1986 the definition changed under the Firearm Owners Protection Act, defining
private sellers as any individual who does not rely on firearm sales as a primary source of
income. This created what is now known as the gun show loophole, meaning individuals can
purchase guns with no background checks in most states. Thus being why some individuals
believe that the only real answer to the problem of gun violence is a complete ban on guns.
Gun ownership is not only an American tradition but a right protected by the Second
Amendment of the United States Constitution. James Lindgren, author of Forward: The Past
And Future Of Guns, explains the Second Amendment in his report. The Second Amendment
reads, A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the
people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. When opponents interpret the Second
Romero 3
Amendment they believe that it protects their right to own firearms, any law that banning
firearms would be deemed unconstitutional. Opponents to more gun laws believe their right to
possess firearms is fundamental to maintaining freedom and liberty that is protected by the
constitution. Opponents to gun control laws believe that more gun laws infringe upon the right to
Most gun owners understand the importance of conducting background checks and how
such regulations help in preventing gun violence. However, there are some who do not believe
that a gun ban would stop gun violence all together. Gun bans would keep law abiding citizens
from having guns for self-defense, while criminals would simply ignore the laws. According to
procon.org, a Lancet study from March 10th 2016 showed no evidence that state gun control laws
decreased gun related deaths. Nine out of twenty five state laws have been associated to higher
gun death rates. Based on this, opponents to gun control believe that gun control laws or gun
Both sides of this debate make valid arguments, but regardless of which side is taken
by an individual, the ultimate goal should be to bring an end to gun violence. Gun laws and bans
could be put in place. However there is no evidence that this would bring a complete end to gun
violence because would be criminals will continue to illegally obtain weapons. Comprehensive
background checks should be in place to ensure that anyone obtaining a gun is legally allowed to
do so. Stricter gun laws or gun bans could potentially decrease the amount of gun violence that
takes place in the United States. However, gun violence will continue to be an issue that affects
Works Cited
Blocher, Joseph and Darrell A. H. Miller. "What Is Gun Control? Direct Burdens, Incidental
Burdens, and the Boundaries of the Second Amendment." University of Chicago Law
search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=114160392&site=ehost-live.
Lindgren, James. "Forward: The past and Future of Guns." Journal of Criminal Law &
search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=f5h&AN=112464434&site=ehost-live.
Vizzard, William J. "The Current and Future State of Gun Policy in the United States." Journal
of Criminal Law & Criminology, vol. 104, no. 4, Fall2015, p. 879. EBSCOhost,
search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=f5h&AN=110668173&site=ehost-live.