LETTER TO THE UMPC HEALTH PLAN MEDICARE PROGRAM Re Lancaster YMCA Membership and Whirlpool Spa Claim May 6, 2017 PDF

Stan J.
Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-528-2200
May 6, 2017
UMPC HEALTH PLAN MEDICARE PROGRAM

U.S. STEEL TOWER
600 GRANT STREET
PITTSBURG, PA 15219
LANCASTER CENTER CITY BRANCH BOARD OF MANAGERS

265 HARRISBURG AVENUE
LANCASTER, PA 17603
717-393-9622
SAMANTHA SEIFRIED, CHAIR JENNIFER REINHART, VICE CHAIR STEVE KIRCHNER, TREASURER
JANE PRICE, SECRETARY MICHAEL C. ANTHONY ERIC ARCUDI MARK CLOYD BRIAN DETWILER
PLA FENIMORE LAURE FLINN BRAIN KEENER DONALD MANN RUTH RIVERA NICOLE SEUFFERT
KRISTEN SIMON
RE: STANLEY J. CATERBONE

MEMBER NUMBER 00327039601
GROUP MCHMO1528
Rx BIN NUMBER 003858
Rx PCN MD
LANCASTER YMCA FREE MEMBERSHIP

HUMAN CLAIM FOR WHIRLPOOL SPA
Dear UMPC,
After immediately taking advantage of the FREE ONE YEAR MEMBERSHIP I was finally able
to take whirlpool spa treatments after 2 years of trying to do the same there and other locations
without success. YOU ARE A LIFESAVER I am now able to at least get some PAIN RELIEF.
Thank you.
Below is a letter dated June 20, 2016 that was sent to my previous MEDICARE
ADVANTAGE PLAN, HUMANA FOR YOUR REVIEW -
[June 21, 2016
Humana Correspondence Office

P.O. Box 14601
Lexington, KY 405124601
Re: Purchase and Installation for Whirlpool Bath To Alleviate Back Pain
Dear Claims Department,
On April 22, 2016 a nurse arrived at my home with photo identification for my third party
Medical Matrix health review. The nurse became annoyed and started to harass me. She kept
trying to get me to terminate the meeting without continuing the health review, which I did not
do. In our meeting I discussed my need for whirlpool spa treatments to help alleviate my back
pain. I reported to her that I once had an outdoor hot tub that worked miracles for my back pain
and recently contacted the company that sells and installs the step-in whirlpool spas. She
promised me that she would pass this information along to Humana and they would contact me.
A few weeks ago I called Humana and the customer service representative disclosed that
there was no record of my Medical Matrix Health Review in your records. In addition, I called
the Medicare hotline and they disclosed that it is very likely that you would cover the purchase
and install of a whirlpool spa for my bathroom. Enclosed is my documentation for your review
and considerations for my claim. I have included medical reports, prescriptions of pain
medications, and product specifications. The whirlpool spa that I selected is the only available
spa that will fit in my bathroom. My home was built in 1952 and is a 1000 sq. ft. row home in
Lancaster, Pa.
The purchase price is $3,674.00. If need be, I could do the install. Please contact me as
soon as possible with your reply.]
I sent that letter after talking to a REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE MEDICARE HOTLING who
assured me that MEDICARE would MOST LIKELY support my claim and award me the benefit of
THE INSTALLATION AND PURCHASE OF AN IN-HOME SPA. Un fortunately, HUMANA never even
acknowledged my claim. I then filed an official complaint with the PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT
OF INSURANCE. I received an official letter stating that the PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF
INSURANCE forwarded my complaint to MEDICARE IN WASHINGTON, D.C.,
Attached is the documentation so that you can hopefully process my claim. Since my last
claim, I have found a more economical and better fit for my WHIRLPOOL SPA needs. COSTCO
has the AQUATERRA VERONA 22 JET, 6-PERSON SPA listed at $2,999.99 DELIVERED. I am now
in the process of finishing my SCREENED-IN-PORCH project and after this weekend will now
have the perfect place for installation. FOR THE RECORD, I HAD A SOFTTUB SPA since 1996 in
my previous home in Conestoga, PA and here at 1250 Fremont Street until 2013. I had to sell
the spa on Craigslist due to my brothers dogs. They had eaten away all of the grass, and the
area around my hot tub became impossible to maintain.
In addition, concerning the conduct of both staff and patrons of the CENTER CITY YMCA
when I am using the facilities, please review the following:
STAN J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
STATE-OF-AFFAIRS
SINCE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TOOK CONTROL as of MAY 4, 2017
___________________
Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly
discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and
fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling
arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to
defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which
would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to
thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We
continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of
protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member
of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster
County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC
Scandal (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
_______________________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-528-2200
FINANCIAL RESOURCES SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY MONTHLY BENEFIT AMOUNT IS

$1,379.00 NET PER MONTH AFTER DEDUCTING MEDICARE AND SUPPLEMENTAL HEALTH
INSURANCE STAN J. CATERBONE has been collecting Social Security Benefits for symptoms and
illnesses as a direct result of the SYMPTOMS AND ILLNESSES RELATED TO U.S. SPONSORED
MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES since 2008, and the Social Security Administration declared
STAN J. CATERBONE PERMENENTLY DISABLED on December 5, 2005; the date that STAN J.
CATERBONE declared a victim of 24/7 synthetic telepathy. Stan J. Caterbone applied for
benefits in April of 2009 and on August 26, 2009 received a check for $21,456.00 REPRESENTING
one year of retroactive benefits, monthly benefits began in September of 2009 and MEDICARE
Benefits began in April of 2010. THE COMPLETE 200 PAGE CASE FILE IS AVAILABLE AND HAS
BEEN POSTED ON SEVERAL SOCIAL MEDIA SITES.
I) In May of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone's CASH RESERVES were approximately $60,000 in various
cash accounts. This fact is evidenced in the Application for Homeowners Rehabilitation Program
with the City of Lancaster. In January when the Trump Administration entered the White House
the cash reserves were approximately $11,200.00.
The cash reserves have been depleted to approximately $5,000 through a systematic and
calculated program of vandalisms, thefts, fraud, and extortions. The Preliminary Injunctions for
Emergency Relief filed in Federal and State Courts are ATTEMPTS TO MITIGATE these programs.
Injunctions have been filed for the past 10 years in various courts. See the Stan J. Caterbone
Court CORECTED Matrix as of APRIL 18, 2017 for details.
II) In 2005 Stan J. Caterbone filed a Chapter 11 Reorganization Bankruptcy Case in the U.S
Bankruptcy Court for Eastern District of Pennsylvania in Reading, Pennsylvania, Case No. 05-
23059. The Chapter 11 case was filed exactly one week after filing in U.S. District Court Case No.
05-2288. The purpose of the Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan was to alert the creditors from
1987 to date that all accounts would be paid in full from the future settlements from the claims
of CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et.al., No. 05-2288. The initial bankruptcy plan
was dismissed in August of 2011 without any resolution and without any creditors being paid
any funds.
III) As the federal and state claims were litigated and preserved from ORDERS of the U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals, Cases No. 07-4474 and 07-4475 in 2008, further attempts to litigate all
claims again became futile due to the efforts of the COINTELPRO PROGRAM, which is responsible
for the computer and electronic hacking, the HARASSMENT Program, and ultimately the
LANDMARK OBSTRUCTION OF PROCESS AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE Cases.
IV) Finally a REORGANIZATION AND DISCLOSURE PLAN was filed on February 7, 2017 for
Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan 17-6015. Unfortunately, the case is again tied up in APPEALS
Courts awaiting resolution in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case
No. 17-01233, with Judge Edward G. Smith presiding.
THE INTERNET, COMPUTER, FILES, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES
I) The following capabilities have been seriously degraded or destroyed completely:
1. INTERNET CONNECTION AT 1250 FREMONT STREET DESTROYED (ATT HOTSPOT

SIGNAL JAMMED) FORCED TO USE THE LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY WHICH COSTS
TIME AND PARKING FEES, NOT TO MENTION THE HARASSMENT AND HACKING
PROGRAM THAT EXISTS AT THAT FACILITY, SEE CATERBONE v. Duke Street
Business Center, et.al., Case No. CI-08-13373 Which Is an OPEN Case.
1. LOST ACCESS TO FEDERAL ELECTRONIC FILING PACER ACCOUNT (FORCED TO

TRAVEL TO FEDERAL COURTHOUSES IN PHILADELPHIA AND READING FOR
COURT DOCKETS AND TO FILE MOTIONS, EXHIBITS, APPEALS, ETC.,
2. LOST ACCESS TO EBAY, AMAZON, ETC., - CAN NO LONGER PURCHASE ITEMS AT
DISCOUNT COST IS IN THE THOUSANDS ALONE
3. LOST ACCESS TO COMCAST CABLE FRAUDULENT BILLING PRACTICES
4. LOST ACCESS TO PAID SOFTWARE ADOBE PDF PROFESIONAL; WORD, EXCEL
(FORCED TO USE GENERI FREE THIRD PARTY DUPLICATES)
5. SPORADIC ABILITY TO PRODUCE DVD'S COMPUTER HACKERS
6. INABILITY TO UPLOAD CRITIC DOCUMENTS TO SCRIBD.COM ACCOUNT FOR
PUBLIC VIEW
7. PRINTING CAPABILITIES WERE TAKEN AWAY IN OCTOBER OF 2016 WHEN THE
$500.00 COSTCO XEROX COPIER/SCANNER/FAX WAS VANDALIZED FORCING
TRIPS TO STATE STREET COPY IN HARRISBURG FOR $.06 PER PAGE.
8. IN FEBRUARY A CANNON B/W PRINTER WAS PURCHASED HOWEVER THE
SCANNER CAPABILITIES WAS DISABLED UPON PURCHASE FORCING THE USE
THE LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY WHICH COSTS TIME AND PARKING FEES, NOT
TO MENTION THE HARASSMENT AND HACKING PROGRAM THAT EXISTS AT THAT
FACILITY, SEE CATERBONE v. Duke Street Business Center, et.al., Case No. CI-
08-13373 Which Is an OPEN Case
9. ALL WIRELESS HEADPHONE CAPABILITIES WERE LOST IN FEBRUARY OF 2017.
10.NO LESS THAN 5 SMARTWATCHES PURCHASED AT KOHLS HAD TO BE RETURNED
DUE TO COMPUTER HACKING SOMEONE DID NOT WANT THAT ELECTRONIC
DEVICE USED.
11.ON MAY 1, 2017 MY MOTOG SMARTPHONE WAS RENDERED USELESS WITH ONLY
CAPABILITIES TO READ EMAILS. ON MAY 1, 2017 I WENT TO COSTCO WHERE I
PURCHASED THE PHONE. COSTCO SAID THE 90 INSTORE WARRANTY EXPIRED
IN FEBRUARY AND THEY GAVE ME A CONSIERE TECHNICAL NUMBER TO CALL
FOR A REPLACEMENT. OF COURSE, WITHOUT PHONE SERVICE, THAT WAS
IMPOSSIBLE. ON MAY 3, 2017 I ACTIVATED MY OWN ATT GOPHONE AT THE ATT
STORE FOR $31.00 ON ROHRERSTOWN ROAD AND THE STORE STAFF GAVE ME A
PHONE NUMBER TO CALL MOTOROLA WARRANTY DEPARTMENT FOR A NEW
PHONE. ( I was busy finishing building my bench seat storage locker under the
patio so I did not make the calls right away) SO NOW I HAD 2 OPTIONS FOR A
REPLACEMNT, ATT WARRANTY DEPARTMENT AND COSTCO CONSIERE TECHNICAL
DEPARTMENT. THEY TOLD ME THE PHONE WAS STILL UNDER WARRANTY AND
THEY WOULD SEND A REPLACEMENT. AFTER 2 DAYS WITHOUT PHONE SERVICE
I AT LEAST HAD THAT. SO NOW I HAD 2 OPTIONS FOR A REPLACEMNT, ATT
WARRANTY DEPARTMENT AND COSTCO CONSIERE TECHNICAL DEPARTMENT.IN
THE EARLY MORNING OF MAY 4, 2017 MY ATT GOPHONE AND MY FLASH DRIVE
FOR LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT WAS STOLEN FROM MY HOME. I NOW AGAIN
HAVE NO PHONE SERVICE TO CALL AND GET MY REPLACEMENT FOR MY MOTO G
SMARTPHONE.
II) SCANNING OF DOCUMENTS CAPABILITIES DESTROYED; FORCED TO USE THE LANCASTER

COUNTY LIBRARY WHICH COSTS TIME AND PARKING FEES, NOT TO MENTION THE HARASSMENT
AND HACKING PROGRAM THAT EXISTS AT THAT FACILITY, SEE CATERBONE v. Duke Street
Business Center, et.al., Case No. CI-08-13373 Which Is an OPEN Case.
2. ANTENNA TV RECEPTION DEGRADED TO ONLY A FEW STATIONS DOWN FROM 11,

NO MORE WGAL-TV 8, NO MORE NEWS BROADCASTS
3. SMARTPHONE NO MORE BOOKMARKED PDF CAPABILITIES, COMPUTER HACKED

24/7 WHILE SEARCHING DOCUMENTS, PHONE CALLS, CANNOT ANSWER ANY PHONE
CALLS GOES DIRECTLY TO MESSAGE
4. DOCUMENTS AND FILES CONSTANTLY ALTERED, MODIFIED, DELETED, AND/OR

STOLEN (On April 17, 2017 approximately 17 Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas CIVIL CASES WERE DELETED FROM THE COURT MATRIX AND HAD TO BE
ENTERED AGAIN INTO THE DATABASE)
5. FORCED TO ADD ANOTHER LOCKED CLOSET
LITIGATION AND COURT CASES
1. In January Stan J. Caterbone took the LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT HABEUS CORPUS CASE,
No. 14-02559 from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Federal Court to the United States
Supreme Court in Case No. 16-6822. The United States Supreme Court Justices held
CONFERENCE on Friday January 6, 2017 and reviewed the case and DENIED the Petition to
rehear the case. In February Stan J. Caterbone was GRANTED VISITING PRIVLEDGES BY
SUPERINTENDANT HAYLETT AFTER SUBMITTING A PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
BACKGROUND CHECK. THE VISITING PRIVLEDGES ARE OPEN ENDED.
2. IN ADDITION STAN J. CATERBONE FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF IN THE LANCASTER COUNTY
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CI-17-00210 in SAVAGEv. BROWN, et.al.,. DAVE
BROWN IS THE CO-AUTHOR WITH LISA MICHELLE AMBERT OF THE NEWLY RELEASED
BOOK TITLED LOVE, MURDER, AND CORRUPTION NLANCASTER COUNTY MY
STORY. STAN J. CATERBONE HAS BEEN COMMUNICATING WITH DAVE BROWN FOR
ALMOST 10 MONTHS. STAN J. CATERBONE ALSO SENT A REQUEST FOR COMMUTATION TO
PRESIDENT BARRACH OBAMA IN DECEMBER. IN MARCH STAN J. CATERBONE PAID FOR
AND RECIEVED AN APPLICATION FOR PARDON FROM THE PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD
IN HARRISBURG AND WILL HAND DELIVER TO LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT IN THE NEAR
FUTURE IN FRAMINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTES.
3. In the same month, January of 2017 Federal Judge Yavette Kane in the Middle District of
Pennsylvania in Harrisburg favorably overturned a MAJOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF, Case No. 16-2513, which was dismissed by Federal Judge Martin
Carlson and TRANSFERRED the Case to the Eastern District in Philadelphia on January 31,
2017. Several phone calls were made for the new DOCKET NUMBER to both the Middle and
Eastern District Clerk of Courts without success to obtain the new CASE DOCKET NUMBER.
Finally a trip to Philadelphia to the Eastern District Clerk of Courts, THE CASE WAS
FINALLY DOCKETED AFTER SITTING ON A DESK FOR ALMOST 4 WEEKS. The was
DOCKETED AS 17-0867 AND ASSIGNED TO FEDERAL JUDGE EDWARD SMITH, IN EASTON,
PENNSYLVANIA. On March 28, 2017 Judge Smith ARBITRARILY DISMISSED the case, and
on APRIL 12, 2017 JUDGE SMITH DID THE SAME FOR A MOTION OF RECONSIDERATION,
WHICH AFTER LEGAL REVIEW, PROVES AT LEAST GROSS INCOMPETENCE AND MOST LIKEY
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND PUBLIC CORRUPTION. TOMMORROW THE CASE WILL BE
APPEALED TO THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS.
4. In 2005 Stan J. Caterbone filed a Chapter 11 Reorganization Bankruptcy Case in the U.S
Bankruptcy Court for Eastern District of Pennsylvania in Reading, Pennsylvania, Case No.
05-23059. The Chapter 11 case was filed exactly one week after filing in U.S. District
Court Case No. 05-2288. The purpose of the Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan was to alert
the creditors from 1987 to date that all accounts would be paid in full from the future
settlements from the claims of CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et.al., No. 05-
2288. The initial bankruptcy plan was dismissed in August of 2011 without any resolution
and without any creditors being paid any funds.
5. Stan J. Caterbone is currently the AMICUS for Former ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

PENNSYLVANIA, KATHLEEN KANE in Case No. 3576 EDA 2016 in the Eastern District of the
Superior Court. Briefs are due on June 16, 2017 by the KATHLEEN KANE Legal Team,
headed by Joshua Lock. As AMICUS, the COURT and ALL PARTIES must copy all legal
filings to Stan J. Caterbone.
6. In the LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS there are 4 Civil Cases
DESIGNATED AS OPEN on the Court Dockets,
I) CI-16-08472 in CATERBONE v. LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, et.al., an INJUNCTION

FOR PAIN MEDICATIONS;
II) CI-16-05815 in CATERBONE v. THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE, an INJUCTION for
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE now in the PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT with ORAL
ARGUEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR THE SUMMER OF 2017;
III) CI- 15-10167 in CATERBONE v. HOTEL BRUNSWICK, et.al., A Case for ANTI-TRUST
VIOLATIONS for the FILM AND ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY; and
IV) CI-08-13373 in CATERBONE v. The Duke Street Library, et.al., a case involving the
early existence of COMPUTER HACKING, HARASSMENT, ETC.,
VII) SUMMARY APPEALS were filed in the LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS for
FABRICATED CRIMINAL TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS and FRUADULENT INSURANCE CLAIMS IN 2016
AND 2017. The most CORRUPT CASE WAS Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL
TO SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA October 28, 2016 when the following occurred:
The Appeal was never DOCKETED BY THE CLERK OF COURT
THE $75.00 PNC BANK MONEY ORDER WAS EXTORTED
The FABRICATED CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS REMAIN ON THE RECORD
THIS CASE IS A CLASSIC VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, PUBLIC CORRUPTION,
EXTORTION, FALSE ARREST, AND PROVES THAT THE LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY OPERATES AS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
VIII) STAN J. CATERBONE LETTER TO THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATORS February 15,
2017
__________________________
FEBRUARY 15, 2017
To: PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATORS

Re: STATE OF AFFAIRS AND FOLLOW-UP TO ANTI-STALKING LEGISLATION EFFORTS
As you many of you know I have been visiting your legislative staff over the past 18 months on many
occasions and distributing materials, including my proposed legislation for more effective and
comprehensive ANTI-STALKING laws in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Due to the severity of
the HARASSMENT AND TORTURE PROGRAM that I am forced to experience on a daily basis, and the
continued ESCALATION by Lancaster City Residents, Neighbors, Law Enforcement, Court Staff, Judges, and
those of Elected Office, I find that I must again refresh your office staff with a renewed sense of urgency to
hear my pleas for help, and serve as a voice of others that are victims of the same said crimes, possibly by
the same said perpetrators.
In order to UPDATE YOU WITH THE CURRENT-STATE-OF-AFFAIRS I am providing the following updated
documents via links in an effort to remind you of your responsibility to me as your constituent and to others
like me.
_________________________
PHYSICAL PAIN, TORTURE, AND CRIPPLING
I) The following is from Case No. CI-16-08472 in CATERBONE v. LANCASTER GENERAL

HOSPITAL, et.al., an INJUNCTION FOR PAIN MEDICATIONS filed in September of 2016;
The PLAINTIFF has used the following treatments and therapies to counter the pain and
suffering in the back and groin areas with success:
1. Spa Therapies, hot tubs and whirlpool baths
2. Message Therapies
3. Laser-Light Therapies
4. Stretching and basic excising
5. Walking
6. Bicycling
THE FOLLOWING MEDICAL DEVICES WERE USED AND/OR INSTALLED

7. Handicap Rails for basement toilet
8. Toilet Seat Riser in upstairs bathroom
9. Tommy Copper back and knee braces
10. Standard Walker
11. PennDOT Handicap Placard
12. Elevated Computer on Desk to stand while using the computer
13. Shoe Inserts
14. (2) - 3ft pickers used to retrieve objects without bending over
15. Memory Foam Adjustable Bed with Vibrating at the lower and upper regions
III) Today Stan J. Caterbone's physical capacity from the TORTURE PROGRAM has been so
degraded that walking has become so degraded that:
1. Walking is so difficult that on most days after 50 or so steps resting is vital

2. Bicycling is impossible
3. Several times a week a WALKER is used in the basement
bedroom,office,laundry, bathroom
4. It is impossible to tie shoes, put on socks (socks have not been worn since the Spring of
2016), clip to nails (Visits to the NAIL SALON at the Manor Shopping Center has occurred
for one year), bending over is impossible.
THE FACT THAT A SUPPLY OF PAIN MEDICATIONS AND THE HOT TUB FOR SPA THERAPY COULD
RESOLVE MOST OF THE ABOVE IS A LANDMARK TORTURE CASE.
IV) One week ago upon waking up the PROGRESSIVE PRESCRIPTION GLASSES WERE STOLEN
resulting in Stan J. Caterbone wearing 2 different RETAIL READING GLASSES.
V) ON APRIL 24, 2017 THE LANCASTER YMCA HAD AN OPEN HOUSE FOR ALL UMPC MEDICARE
BENEFICIARIES. I ATTENDED AND UNDER MY CURRENT PLAN A FREE YEAR LONG MEMBERSHIP
WAS ISSUED SO THAT I COULD FINALLY GET A REGULAR WHIRLPOON SPA TREATMENT. I TRIED
TO USE THE LANCASTER YMCA WHIRLPOOL SPA ABOUT ONE YEAR AGO WITHOUT SUCCESS. I
STARTED TREATMENTS IMMEDIATELY ON APRIL 24, 2017 AND HAVE GONE EVERYDAY,
SOMETIMES THREE TIMES PER DAY. HOWEVER IT WAS NOT WITHOUT A COST THE STALKING
AND HARASSMENT MADE IT ALMOST INNEFFECTIVE. ON THE EVENING OF MAY 3, 2017 THE
STAFF AT THE LANCASTER YMCA GOT DESPERATE AND PUT A CLOSED FOR MAINTENANCE
SIGN ON THE WHIRLPOOL SO NOW I AM NOT ABLE TO GET ANYMORE TREATMENTS. ON MAY 3
2017 I STARTED ANOTHER INSURANCE CLAIM TO UMPC FOR ANOTHER WHIRLPOOL SPA FOR MY
HOME, IDENTICAL TO THE CLAIM MADE TO HUMANA ON JUNE 20, 2016; WHICH WAS ALSO THE
BASIS FOR THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF FILED IN SEPTEMBER OF
2016. UNFORTUNATELY, JUDGE DAVID ASHWORTH, THE LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF
COMMON PLEAS JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE CASE REFUSES TO ADJUDICATE EVEN THE IN FORMA
PAUPERIS APPLICATION. IN NOVEMBER OF 2016 I FILED A MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGEMENT, STILL NO RULING IN THE CASE.
SOCIAL AND PUBLIC ACCESS

I) Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few
FABRICATED NO TREPASS NOTICES every year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated
mental illness history. In addition to isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with
good live music. Prohibit from defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy
history of strong Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church.
The Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of entitled
benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during the same time
period.
1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of 2005,
original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing Fulton Bank in
2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice, Corraborated by Jack
Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice,
allowed to reenter in 2015.
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City Police in
2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley, and
Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael Geesey, in
2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John Valentino,
Owner, No Formal Notice
10.Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11.Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in March of
2009, by 1st Class Mail
12.Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13.Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by Lori
Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.
14.TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice
15.Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No Formal
Notice
16.Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17.O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18.Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security Officer.
19.Lancaster General Hospital, Gary S. Gehman, MD, May 25, 2010, for recording Dr. Brian Sullivan
of Abbeyville Family Health re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and posting on my Wordpress Blog.
20.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason was for
complaining of harassment and stalking.
21. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police Chief Pete
Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President, Debra Hoeckler
22.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times, with no
reason and no written notice.
23.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and was told
by bartender to leave and not come back.
24.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me communicate with
Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288 for Fulton Bank in U.S.
District Court.
25.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain regarding
harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.
26.Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Northwest Office Building, November 23, 2015,
Harrisburg, PA, Delivered COMPLAINT re Bars and Restaurants in Lancaster engaged in
Discrimination, Stalking, Harassment, Assaults, etc., Would not allow access to Legal Counsel, and
female who took complaint would not provide ID.
27.Southeast Medical Facilities and Brightside Church Office, February 2016, Would not issue
pain medication and filed a Private Criminal Complaint with the Lancaster County District Attorney,
no opinion as of yet.
28.Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office in Strawberry Square, Harrisburg, PA I arbitrarily
received a phone call while delivering a CD-ROM to PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane re
CORRUPTION OF JUDICIAL, LAW ENFORCEMENT, AND POLITICIANS of Pennsylvania.
29.U.S. Federal Facilities per the National Security Agency Interrogation of March 9, 2016 at the NSA
Headquarters in Ft. Meade, Maryland. Handcuffed and Interrogated for over an hour and finally let
go and told not to continue on to Washington, D.C. And said I was no longer permitted to visit any
U.S. Federal Facilities.
30.Lancaster Newspapers In June of 2016 I arbitrarily received an email the day I was supposed to
participate in a town meeting at LNP and warned me that I was banned and had been for years
although in the year before I had meetings with editors regarding my MOVANT standing in the Lisa
Michelle Lambert case.
31.TELLUS360, May of 2016, I went to enter on a weekend night and the doorman told me I could
not enter that night without any explanation or reason.
32.Yorgos Restaurant and Bar, The owner, Mrs. Arbitrarily barred me during the month of March,
right before the false imprisonment at the NSA in Ft. Meade, Maryland
33.Annie Baily's Irish Pub, A bartender arbitrarily barred me in July, then they allowed me in then
again a so called Manager banned me again. I recorded the last incident.
34.Altana Club, Bar, and Meeting Space On Thursday, July 14, 2016 Scott, the bartender
arbitrarily banned me, which again I recorded.
35.The Press Room Bar and Restaurant A bartender arbitrarily barred me, then again on
Thursday July 14, 2016 another bartender banned me, which again I recorded.
All of the above use the tactics of threats and harassment in order to invoke and provoke a response worthy
of arrest or involuntary psychiatric commitment. When the strategy fails they resort in illegal verbal no
trespass notices by low level employees. In the summer of 2015 a Lancaster City Police Officer, while
parked at the Sunoco convenience store on the corner of West Orange and Prince Street informed me that
the establishments were required to provide written notice, or they could not be enforced.
II) Downtown Lancaster Establishment's that have been endorsing and engaging in WHOLESALE
STALKING, HARASSMENT, AND COLLUSION TO PHYSICAL THREATS OF VIOLENCE ON A REGULAR
BASIS, 2005 to present:
1. Yorgos Restaurant and Bar

2. Mariott Bar at Penn Square
3. Annie Baily's Irish Pub
4. TELLIUS 360 Irish Pub, Nightclub, and now computer lab
5. Altana Club, Bar, and Meeting Space
6. Cigar Bar
7. O'Hallorans Bar and Restaurant
8. Lancaster Dispensing Company
9. The Press Room Bar and Restaurant
10. The Federal Taphouse
11. Lancaster City Police Department Headquarters
III) Again 1252 FREMONT STREET and SURROUNDING BLOCKS are used as PREMIER
STALKING/HARASSMENT CLUBS. Leaving and Entering the HOME AT 1250 FREMONT STREET IS
IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT STALKERS DOING THE SAME.
June 10, 2016 Statement re Pitt Bull Attack at 1252 Fremont Street
The spics (slang for entitled Spanish assholes) at 1252 Fremont Street were all outside in the back
yard when I started to work. My laborer, Norm showed up and then they all of a sudden disappeared. I had
to go into the backyard of 1252 to undo the temporary fence I erected yesterday. I open the gate, close it
behind me and the BLACK PITBULL and YORKIE come running out of the house attacking me. The spics set
it all up by leaving when they knew full well that I would be coming into the yard to work on the fence.
THAT IS THE SECOND TIME HE BIT ME, THE FIRST TIME THEY LET HIM OUT AND HE CAME IN MY
YARD AND SNAPPED AT ME JUST MISSING MY FINGER!
ONE DAY WHEN I WAS WORKING THE spics PUT A BROWN PITTBULL IN THE YARD SO I COULD
NOT WORK!
Yesterday, the bitch offered to move an old freezer so I could work on the fence. I said "no, that is alright, I
can get it myself". That is the first time I talked to the bitch since she chased me in my front lawn last fall
because I blew the leaves and some floated into her pile of leaves on her front lawn. THE BITCH DOES
NOT OWN 1252 FREMONT STREET, AND AFTER I SET THE POSTS AND INSTALLED THE FIRST
SECTION OF FENCE, ME AND THE OWNER, DAVE SHRECK, DISCUSSED MY PROJECT AND HE GAVE
ME HIS PERMISSION TO ERECT AND INSTALL THE FENCE. THAT WAS PROBABLY 4 WEEKS AGO!
ARE THE DOGS LICENSED? AND WHOS' ARE THEY? LIKE MOST PEOPLE IN THAT HOUSE YOU
DON'T KNOW WHO LIVES THERE AND WHO DOES NOT!
When I left for the Hospital at about 3:00pm on June 10, 2016 The Bitch yelled uncontrollable at me from
on of her windows as I went to my car, which was parked in the back of my yard. She kept yelling I am not
ever going to be allowed in her yard. The theme has been ever since I started my project to thwart my
attempts at progress every step of the way.
The breaking point came on Thursday when I declared the screened in porch would be done by Monday,
June 13, 2016. Too much privacy for me for all my neighbors to envision me having. To this day and time,
6:00pm on Saturday, June 11, 2016 I have not gone out in my back yard since the attack. I had my laborer
Norm, bring in all the tools right after the attack.
_________________________________
THE ABOVE RESULTED IN THE FOLLOWING:
1. 4 HOUR EMERGENCY HOSPITAL VISIT TO LANCASTER REGIONAL

2. 10 VICODIN FOR PAIN WERE PRESCRIBED
3. A RABID DOG REPORT WAS ISSUED
4. WORK ON THE BACKYARD PROJECT WAS INTERUPTED AND STILL NOT COMPLETED DUE TO
THE THREATS AND THE USE OF DOGS AS DETERENTS
5. LOSS OF TIME AND CAPTIAL INVESTMENT IN MATERIALS TO COMPLETE PROJECT
6. HARASSMENT BY LANCASTER CITY ZONING OFFICIALS FOR MATERIALS STORED IN THE
BACK ORCHARD
7. THE PERCEPTION OR REALITY THAT THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE ARE USING 1252
FRIMONT STREET TO SUPPORT AND RECRUIT FOR THE COINTELPRO HARASSMENT
PROGRAM
8. SUPPORT AND RECRUITMENT FOR THE LANCASTER COUNTY COINTELPRO HARASSMENT
PROGRAM
IV) After 2 years of replanting the FRONT YARD IVY BED and THE IVY BED BEING IN THE BEST
CONDITION SINCE THE ORIGINAL PLANTING IN 1970'S SOMEONE DELIBERATELY WITH MALICE
DESTROYED THE IVY BED WITH MAJOR AREAS OF DEAD SPOTS. SEVERAL FLATS OF IVY WERE
PURCHASED AT STAUFFERS ON RHORESTOWN ROAD.
V) FOR THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS I CAN NO LONGER ENJOY THE OUTSIDE OF MY HOME,
FRONT OR BACK, DUE TO THE THREATS AND HARASSMENT OF 1252 FREMONT STREET. I CAN'T
EVEN SIT ON MY BACK OR FRONT PORCHES TO SMOKE A CIGARETTE OR HAVE A CUP OF COFFEE.
MOST DAYS I HAVE TO TRY TO STATEGICALLY PLAN WHEN TO TAKE OUT THE TRASH, MOW THE
GRASS, WATER MY PLANTS AND GRASS, ETC. FOR THE PAST MONTH OR SO I HAVE TO SNEAK IN
AND OUT OF MY OWN HOME.
DATED: MAY 4, 2017

Respectfully,
______________________

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-528-2200
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly
discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within
International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1
Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law
enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our
communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We
continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to
continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed
from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle
Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
ACTIVE COURT CASESACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF
JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION
TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for
Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle
Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 17-01233 Chapter 11 Appeal for 17-10615; Case No. 17-0867
Preliminary Injunction from Middle District; Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.; Case No. 16-
cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR
HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-
0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015;
16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472 INJUNCTION re Pain
Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case No. 16-10157
Stan J. Caterbone

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
MARCH 21, 2017
STAN J CATERBONE & ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

INTERNET LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS
7 SOCIAL MEDIA SITES
23 NEW LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS, March 13, 2017
84 INTERNET LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS, February 14, 2014
STAN J. CATERBONE & ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

SOCIAL MEDIA SITES
_________________________
1. STAN J. CATERBONE'S WEBSITE www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
2. STAN J. CATERBONE'S YOUTUBE CHANNEL -

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWqz_swlj5dsEvufnsJjRSQ
3. STAN J. CATERBONE'S TWITTER PAGE - https://twitter.com/SCaterbone
4. STAN J. CATERBONE'S SCRIBD PAGE FOR DOCUMENTS -

https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
5. STAN J. CATERBONE'S LINKDIN PAGE - https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?

id=429457751&trk=nav_responsive_tab_profile_pic
6. STAN J. CATERBONE'S AUDIO RECORDINGS ON YOURLISTEN.COM

http://yourlisten.com/Stan.Caterbone
7. STAN J. CATERBONE'S AUDIO RECORDINGS ON SOUNDCLOUD -

https://soundcloud.com/stan-caterbone?
utm_source=soundcloud&utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=twitter
23 NEW LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS

16. Case No. 17-cv-867-EGS Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief MOTION TO FILE
EXHIBIT TITLED LETTER TO HUNTINGTON BANK ANDREW GRIMMIT re Liquidation Offer
March 21, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/342581480/Case-No-17-cv-867-EGS- Preliminary-
Injunction-for-Emergency-Relief-MOTION-TO-FILE-EXHIBIT-TITLED- LETTER-TO-HUNTINGTON-
BANK-ANDREW-GRIMMIT-re-Liquidati
17. LETTER to HIGH INDUSTRIES re MARRIOTT BAR THREATS, HARASSMENT, THEFT OF

MONIES March 13, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/341731227/Letter-to-High-Industries-
Re-MARRIOTT-HOTEL-BAR-Threats-Harassment-Theft-of-Monies-March-13-2017
18. FEDERAL PRIVATE CRIMINAL NOTARIZED COMPLAINT Filed in U.S. EASTERN DISTRICT
COURT March 12, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/341681228/FEDERAL-PRIVATE-
CRIMINAL-NOTARIZED-COMPLAINT-Filed-in-U-S-EASTERN-DISTRICT-COURT-March-12-
2017
19. History of the Internet - DARPA and Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group March
12, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/341681178/History-of-the-Internet-DARPA-and-Stan-
J-Caterbone-and-Advanced-Media-Group-March-12-2017
20. WIKILEAKS CIA DATA DUMP re 100 NAMED TARGETED INDIVIDUALS OF MIND CONTROL
https://www.scribd.com/document/341681162/TARGETED-INDIVIDUAL-TESTIMONIES-AND-
LISTS-Our-Selected-Witnesses-by-WIKILEAKS-March-10-2017
21. CHAPTER 11 CASE No. 10615 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO JUDGE RICHARD FEHLINGS ORDER OF
FEBRUARY 28, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/341519915/Chapter-11-17-10615REF-
NOTICE-OF-APPEAL-TO-U-S-DISTRICT-COURT-FOR-THE-EASTERN-DISTICT-OF-
PENNSYLVANIA-OF-JUDGE-RICHARD-FEHLINGS-ORDER-of-February-28
22. 02101-NT-000214-2016 ORDER BY LANCASTER COUNTY COMMON PLEAS JUDGE MERRIS

SPAHN GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION
https://www.scribd.com/document/341298288/STAN-J-CATERBONE-MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016-
re-NOISE-TOO-LOUD-ORDER-by-JUDGE-MERRILL-SPAHN-IN-FORMA-PAUPERIS-
GRANTED-APPEAL-DOCKETED-February-22-201
23. STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP INVOICES AND STATEMENTS OF
MARCH 8, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/341298279/Advanced-Media-Group-
INVOICES-and-STATEMENTS-for-March-8-2017
24. NOTARIZED ENOUGH IS ENOUGH DECLARATION BY STAN J. CATERBONE MARCH 5, 2017

https://www.scribd.com/document/341018022/NOTARIZED-ENOUGH-IS-ENOUGH-by-Stan-J-
Caterbone-on-March-2-2017-and-Case-No-CI-16-08472-EMERGENCY-INJUNCTION-FOR-
PAIN-MEDICATIONS-March-5-2017
25. LETTER TO MATHEW HAVERSTICK, ATTORNEY FOR SCOTT MARTIN re MARTINE v.

LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFF MARK REESE FOR IMPEACHMENT
https://www.scribd.com/document/340996107/Stan-J-Caterbone-LETTER-to-Matthew-H-
Haverstick-re-MARTIN-v-Reese-CI-17-04626-March-5-2017
26. STAN J. CATERBONE NEW CASE IN U.S. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT IN EASTERN DISTRICT
CASE No. 17-867 CATERBONE v. NSA, et.al., PRELIMINARY INJUCTION FOR EMERGENCY
RELIEF https://www.scribd.com/document/340923402/STAN-J-CATERBONE-NEW-CASE-Case-
No-17-cv-00867-EGS-Preliminary-Injunction-for-EMERGENCY-RELIEF-in-U-S-EASTERN-
District-of-Pennsylvania-March-4-20
27. KATHLEEN KANE APPEAL CASE IN SUPERIOR COURT OPINION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
COURT OF MARCH 2, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/340823932/Superior-Court-of-
Pennsylvania-Case-No-3575-EDA-2016-MONTGOMERY-COUNTY-OPINION-AND-STAN-J-
CATERBONE-AMICUS-March-2-2017
28. STAN J. CATERBONE LETTER TO PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATORS re ANTI-STALKING

PROPOSED LEGISLATION OF MARCH 3, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340823930/STAN-J-CATERBONE-LETTER-TO-THE-
PENNSYLVANIA-STATE-LEGISLATORS-March-3-2017
29. STAN J. CATERBONE NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT FOR LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS CASE CI-17-00206 SAVAGE v. Dave Brown re LAMBERT BOOK
https://www.scribd.com/document/340736354/LANCASTER-COUNTY-COURT-OF-
COMMON-PLEAS-Cases-No-CI-17-00206-SAVAGE-v-BROWN-et-al-re-AFFIDAVIT-of-
ENOUGH-IS-ENOUGH-March-2-2017
30. NOTORIZED DECLARATION TITLED ENOUGH IS ENOUGH BY STAN J. CATERBONE ON

MARCH 1, 2017 https://www.scribd.com/document/340618722/ENOUGH-is-ENOUGH-by-Stan-J-
Caterbone-on-March-1-2017
31. LETTER TO TARGETED INDIVIDUAL ABBE EDISON OF PITTSBURG, PA re ADVISE ON

COUNTER TECHNIQUES https://www.scribd.com/document/340479872/LETTER-TO-ABBE-
EDISON-February-27-2017
32. CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY CASE No. 17-10615 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF JUDGE
RICHARD FEHLINGS DISMISSAL OF FEBRUARY 26, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340479838/Chapter-11-17-10615REF-MOTION-FOR-
RECONSIDERATION-OF-JUDGE-FEHLINGS-ORDER-OF-FEBRUARY-16-2017-February-26-
2017
33. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE COMPLAINT No. 055746172-0101 re GEICO

COMPLAINT FOR ACCIDENT OF FEBRUARY 28, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340354393/PENNSYLVANIA-DEPARTMENT-OF-
INSURANCE-COMPLAINT-re-STAN-J-CATERBONE-GEICO-CLAIM-NUMBER-055746172-
0101-030-with-AFFIDAVIT-February-25-2017
34. STAN J. CATERBONE LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CASE No. CI-08-
13373 PREACIPE TO ADD DEFENDANTS MASON PFLUMM et.al., February 25, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/340354387/Lancaster-County-Court-Case-No-08-CI-13373-re-
PRAECIPE-TO-ADD-DEFENDANTS-February-25-2017
35. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE COMPLAINT No. 055746172-0101 re GEICO

COMPLAINT FOR ACCIDENT OF FEBRUARY 28, 2017 WITH NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT
https://www.scribd.com/document/340278864/PENNSYLVANIA-DEPARTMENT-OF-
INSURANCE-COMPLAINT-re-STAN-J-CATERBONE-GEICO-CLAIM-NUMBER-055746172-
0101-030-with-NOTARIZED-AFFIDAVIT-February-25-20
36. STAN J. CATERBONE NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT FOR LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS CASE CI-17-00206 SAVAGE v. Dave Brown re REQUEST FOR APPEARANCE AND
AMICUS BRIEF https://www.scribd.com/document/339729747/STAMPED-VERSION-
LANCASTER-COUNTY-COURT-OF-COMMON-PLEAS-Cases-No-CI-17-00206-SAVAGE-v-
BROWN-et-al-REQUEST-FOR-APPEARANCE-and-AMICUS-BRIEF-Febr
37. STAN J. CATERBONE LETTER TO PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATORS re ANTI-STALKING

PROPOSED LEGISLATION OF FEBRUARY 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/339421116/STAN-J-CATERBONE-LETTER-TO-THE-
PENNSYLVANIA-STATE-LEGISLATORS-February-15-2017
38. STAN J. CATERBONE'S PHOTO INVENTORY OF 1250 FREMONT STREET HOME, LANCASTER,
PENNSYLVANIA OF FEBRUARY 14, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/339337180/STAN-J-CATERBONE-1250-FREMONT-
STREET-LANCASTER-PA-INVENTORY-February-14-2017
84 INTERNET LINKS OF EVIDENCE OF ALL CLAIMS
1. ERIC COHEN AND ROBERT BERUBE, Federal Public Defender for Esteban Santiago, Ft.
Lauderdale Shooter, INVOICE AND FEE SCHEDULE January 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337072519/ERIC-COHEN-Federal-Public-Defender-
for-Esteban-Santiago-Ft-Lauderdale-Shooter-INVOICE-AND-FEE-SCHEDULE-January-20-
2017
2. STAN CATERBONE NAMED AMICUS FOR KATHLEEN KANE Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Case No. 3575 EDA 2016 FRIDAY JANUARY 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337120127/STAN-CATERBONE-NAMED-AMICUS-
FOR-KATHLEEN-KANE-Superior-Court-of-Pennsylvania-Case-No-3575-EDA-2016-FRIDAY-
JANUARY-20-2017
3. WHISTLEBLOWERS KAREN STEWART AND STAN CATERBONE A Candid Discussion of

Electronic Harassment Protocols, January 11, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336256943/WHISTLEBLOWERS-KAREN-STEWART-
AND-STAN-CATERBONE-A-Candid-Discussion-of-Electronic-Harassment-Protocols-
January-11-2017
4.The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking Program

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/surreptitious-reincarnation-cointelpro-cops-program-
stan-caterbone
5. Video: Media Blacks Out Edward Snowdens Talk On COINTELPRO & History Of Mass
Surveillance
http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-media-blacks-out-edward-snowdens-talk-on-
cointelpro-history-of-mass-surveillance/224222/
6. Letters: Snowden deserves pardon by John and Bonnie Raines, Philadelphia of the Citizens
Commission to Investigate the FBI in 1971
http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20170119_Letters__Snowden_deserves_pardon.
html
7. Legal Implications of the Soviet Microwave Bombardment of the U.S. Embassy

https://www.scribd.com/document/336787302/Legal-Implications-of-the-1959-Soviet-
Microwave-Bombardment-of-the-U-S-Embassy-January-17-2017
THE COMPUTER HACKER WANTS THIS FREE SPACE

SO HAVE AT IT - ASSHOLE
8. Congressman Robert Walker Pleading July 7 1991 Important
https://www.scribd.com/document/270267368/Congressman-Robert-Walker-Pleading-
July-7-1991-Important
9. That time the CIA was convinced a self-proclaimed psychic had paranormal abilities
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/01/19/that-time-the-
cia-was-convinced-a-self-proclaimed-psychic-had-paranormal-abilities/?
postshare=8421484844095309&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.b487b6ae00e7
10. Obama's most enduring legacy may be the establishment of the modern US surveillance
state
http://www.businessinsider.com/obamas-most-enduring-legacy-the-modern-us-
surveillance-state-2017-1
ANTI-TRUST LINKS OF EVIDENCE
11. The Extortion of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pa by COINTELPRO PROGRAMS January
17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336832214/The-Extortion-of-220-Stone-Hill-Road-
Conestoga-Pa-by-COINTELPRO-PROGRAMS-January-17-2017
12. AMG LEGAL SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE Mastered on April 16, 1991 at Commadore Inc., January
17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787897/AMG-LEGAL-SYSTEMS-PROTOTYPE-
Mastered-on-April-16-1991-at-Commadore-Inc-January-17-2017
13. Stan J. Caterbone, Controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., 1993 to 1998 January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787739/Stan-J-Caterbone-Controller-of-
Pflumm-Contractors-Inc-1993-to-1998-January-17-2017
14. Sam Lombardo and Raolph Mazzochi Charlotte Street Proposal by Advanced Media
Group and Stan J. Caterbone January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787416/Sam-Lombardo-and-Raolph-Mazzochi-
Charlotte-Street-Proposal-by-Advanced-Media-Group-and-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-17-2017
15. B2B Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16, 2017

https://www.scribd.com/document/336787303/B2B-Consulting-From-1999-to-2002-
January-16-2017
16. 1999 Excelsior Place Business Plan by Stan J. Caterbone January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336719627/1999-Excelsior-Place-Business-Plan-by-Stan-J-
Caterbone-January-16-2017
17. Stan J. Caterbone AIM MUTUAL FUNDS Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336738750/Stan-J-Caterbone-AIM-MUTUAL-FUNDS-
Consulting-From-1999-to-2002-January-16-2017
18. Pro Financial Group Brochure and Eastern Regional Free Agent Camp by Stan J. Caterbone
January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336704842/Pro-Financial-Group-Brochure-and-Eastern-
Regional-Free-Agent-Camp-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-16-2017
19. STAN J. CATERBONE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP JOINT VENTURE WITH DALE HIGH January
15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637179/56-STAN-J-CATERBONE-ADVANCED-MEDIA-
GROUP-JOINT-VENTURE-WITH-DALE-HIGH-January-15-2017
20. Institutional Investors Mortgage Banking Business Development of 1987 January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637178/58-Institutional-Investors-Mortgage-Banking-
Business-Development-of-1987-January-15-2017
21. 1987 JOINT VENTURE - Tony Bongiovi, Power Station Studios, and Flatbush Films with Stan
J. Caterbone January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637176/55-1987-JOINT-VENTURE-Tony-Bongiovi-
Power-Station-Studios-and-Flatbush-Films-with-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-15-2017
22. STAN J. CATERBONE'S Financial Management Group, Ltd., Anti-Trust Litigation File of October
17, 2015
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637173/57-STAN-J-CATERBONE-S-Financial-
Management-Group-Ltd-Anti-Trust-Litigation-File-of-October-17-2015
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY FALSE IMPRISONMENTS

AND COINTELPRO LINKS OF EVIDENCE
23. FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence Agencies

November 12, 2016
https://www.scribd.com/document/329761557/FALSE-IMPRISONMENT-AND-ILLEGAL-
INTERROGATIONS-by-U-S-Intelligence-Agencies-and-U-S-Sponsored-Mind-Control-EVIDENCE-
November-2-2016
24. Letter REQUEST for COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to President
Obama, November 15, 2016
25. Stan J. Caterbone and Conflicts With the Trump Administration - Monday November 14, 2016
| False Claims Act | Military
26. STAN J. CATERBONE and the DEPARTMENT of DEFENSE Documents and Evidence of
Conspiracy to .... Saturday November 12, 2016
27. Feds Probe Fulton Bank and 3 Other Subsidiary Banks of Fulton Financial With Stan J.
Caterbone Civil Actions and Mind Control Research of Monday November 9, 2016 |
28. Robert Gates
29. Letter to James Comey, Director of FBI Re Cointelpro Used to Obstruct Justice Monday
November 28, 2016 | Federal Bureau Of Investigation | Central Intelligence Agency
30. VITALLY IMPORTANT - LETTER and DOCUMENT to Cappello & Noel, LLP of Santa Barbara, CA
Friday November 25, 2016
31. Report of Douglas F Gansler/Kathleen Kane on Misuse of Commonwealth Email Systems

November 22, 2016 Published by ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP |
32. Pro Se Legal Representation In The United States | Motion In United States Law
33. Lancaster Mayor Rick Gray Says There is Room for Improvement in Police
34. Communication - CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Bureau, et.al., November 22, 2016 |
Central Intelligence Agency
35. Chapter 12 - ROHYPNOL AND SATELLITE and Chapter 11 - NEIGHBORS FROM HELL, from
Satellite Terrorism in America, by Dr. John Hall Copyright 2009
36. | J. Edgar Hoover | Federal Bureau Of Investigation
37. JIM GUERIN, FOUNDER OF ISC, FAREWELL LETTER OF 1989 December 26, 2016 | Justice |
Government
38. CHRISTOPHER PATTERSON Candidate for JUDGESHIP and His 1987 EFFORT FOR MY
GUARDIANSHIP Friday December 16, 2016
39. ANOTHER LANCASTER COVER-UP THE SALE OF THE MASONIC HALL IN THE CITY OF
LANCASTER, by The Advanced Media Group, December 15, 2016 | Fraternal Service
Organizations
40. Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com TOTALS and MONTHLY From

May of 2016 to January 2017 - January 10, 2017
41. My Friend and Colleague Soleilmavis Liu of China a Victim of Mind Control Living in China
Who Started Peacepink- August 28, 2016
42. TD Ameritrade TRADEKEEPER PROFIT-LOSS FOR 2004 TRADES and 2017 FULTON STOCK
January 9, 2017
43. POLICE INCIDENT REPORTS OF PHYSICAL ASSAULTS FOR STAN J. CATERBONE 2005 TO 2016
January 6, 2017
44. Judiciaries
45. UPDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS re CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Department US

District Court Case 08-cv-08982 December 28, 2016
46. Section 504 Of The Rehabilitation Act | Rehabilitation Act Of 1973
47. UPDATED - EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as Targeted Individuals of

U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and Related Hearings and Lectures, December 27, 2016
48. Torture
49. Stan J. Caterbone on Twitter: "I'm reading FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL
INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence... on @Scribd! https://t.co/T3D9nIYvMt #ReadMore"
50. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 re PRAECIPE TO ADD DEFENDANTS COMEY
AND TRUMP REMOVE OBAMA January 23, 2017
51. INVOICE AND Letter to James Comey, Director of FBI Re Pro Se Billings Invoice Wednesday
November 30, 2016
52. Kathy Harrison (KATHLEEN HARRISON NAMED IN SAVAGE SUIT v. Dave Brown) Email Re Bi
Polar March 10, 2005
53. The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking Program -
Lancaster City Police Strategic Plan, August 24, 2016
54. LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Cases No. CI-17-00210 and CI-17-00206
BOWMAN and SAVAGE v. BROWN, et.al.,
55. REQUEST FOR APPEARANCE and AMICUS BRIEF January 25, 2017.pdf | Amicus Curiae |
National Security Agency
56. Family of Karlie Hall files suit against Millersville University, others; calls death preventable
January 25, 2017 | Law Reference | Government
57. Stan J. Caterbone Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Filled in Forms January 27, 2017
58. U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT ISSUANCE LETTER FOR NEW CASE NO. 17-10615-ref To Judge
Fehling Friday January 27, 2017
59. Stan J. Caterbone Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case No. 17-10615 Judge Fehling Filed On January
27, 2017 - CASE FILE | Plea | Defamation
60. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 EXHIBIT re THE DONALD TRUMP PRESIDENCY
and STAN J. CATERBONE as of January 28, 2017 - electronically filed | Federal Bureau Of
Investigation | Nasa
61. ACCIDENT REPORT NO. 1701-029468 LANCASTER CITY POLICE OFFICER REPPERT SATURDAY
JANUARY 28, 2017
62. Lancaster County Court Case No. 08-CI-13373 PRAECIPE TO AMEND COMPLAINT January 29,
2017 - FILED ELECTRONICALLY January 29, 2017
63. Stewart Baker - Wikipedia
64. 16-cv-2513 Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief in Middle District NOTICE OF APPEAL
TO USCA THIRD CIRCUIT January 26, 2017 | Defamation
65. Homeowners Rehab Application File of June 8, 2015 - COINTELPRO EXTORTION MODEL
RESULTS January 30, 2017
66. Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se, U.S.C.A. Third Circuit BRIEF STATEMENT OF JUDICIAL
MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY of February 1, 2017
67. PLAINTIFF Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF
EASTERN DISTRICT of PENNSYLVANIA With IFP and Civil Cover Sheet - on February 2, 2017
68. Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 17-10615REF SUBMITTALS FOR FEBRUARY 3 - February 2, 2017
69. Jeremy Scahill on Donald Trump and the Military-Industrial Complex - Truthdig
In an interview with acTVism, the investigative journalist also discusses the
70. significance of the Ramstein Air Base in Germany. - 2017/02/02
71. Pennsylvania State Police Liquor Control Enforcement Formal Complaint AGAINST
DOWNTOWN LANCASTER BARS, August 12, 2016 | Lawsuit | United States Courts Of Appeals
72. Case No. CI-16-08472 EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR PAIN MEDICATIONS - Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas September 21, 2016 - CRIMINAL ACT OF TORTURE |
73. Torture LAW and the United States - Wikipedia by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP, February 4, 2017
74. CI-16-08472 DOCKET SHEET February 3, 2017 and Torture LAW and the United States -
Wikipedia by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, February 4, 2017
75. LIP News - CORRUPTION IN THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND LNP - February
4, 2017
76. LETTER to Andrew Wallet re Britney Spears Conservatorship February 4, 2017
78. 16-Cv-2513 Preliminary Injunction for EMERGENCY RELIEF in Middle District ORDER by
JUDGE KANE TRANSFER to EASTERN DISTRICT PHIL January 31, 2017
79. Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board LETTER Re 2016-788 (Asworth) 2016-789 (Reinaker)
February 2, 2017
80. Chapter 11 17-10615ref REORGANIZATION PLAN February 7, 2017 | Bankruptcy | Chapter
81. Chapter 11 17-10615REF STAN J. CATERBONE CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN and

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT February 7, 2017
82. Third Circuit Senior Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, who is President Donald Trump’s
older sister, decided this week to go inactive on the bench, relinquishing her staff and chambers
despite being scheduled to hear cases this year.
83. STAN J. CATERBONE June 18, 2008 US District Court Case 08-02982 CATERBONE v. Lancaster
City Police Bureau, et.al., CASE FILE | Complaint
84.STAN J. CATERBONE MJ-02101-NT-0000470-2017 DUTIES AT STOP SIGN - MOTION TO

DISMISS February 12, 2017
DOCUMENT DIVIDER
Landmark Human Rights Torture Case
%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !
()*+
, # $ (-.+/
000 &&" " ! & 1#
# 2& !" #
-(-3*)43))++
))$ )+(-
56 " & ! 60 6
, # ' 7 "
, # ' 6
*+ 8
, # $ (-.+)
56 " & , 0 # & "

! !# 7 6 ! !# 7 '" !
" 6
.+( 8
6!" "16! $ (9(+.
: 3(.3+4;-) "! ! ' < # ! 7 ! "! 7

, 8 !&6 5
! " # $ $
! %& ' (()* ++"
, ! % %% #
# $ - , #
# ! . % ,
% " ! # / - (0
, "
1 2 3 ! $
% " ! "
! % 4
, ! 5 = "! ! ' & #' < # !
7 > "! 7: 3 1 ! !# ! ? #6 ! 6 #8
1 6 # < ! ! 6 , # ' 6 ' 0! 6 '
< !# ! 6 7!" !#! " 1" ! 0! 6 6 '" ! !#! "
# @ $# )+(.3-44$ & ! $ 6 # ! 0! 6 ! ! 7'
5 A 5 5 5 5 5 B @ 5 5
,, 5 C , D 5 5 ,, 5 @ 5
5 , 5 , 5 5 5 6
8= ""! 5 ! ! !# ? ' 6 "" 7 7 #
LETTER TO JUDGE DAVID ASHWORTH Page 1 of 904 Wednesday March 22, 2017
56 7 "" 0! & ! 1 7 6 ! < # ! $! :
E 1 !" 7 )+(. 6 , 5 # !# 0! 6 !# F ! & 6 7! 7

! 36 3 6 1'3 1 56 , 5 6 6 ! # (99. 7 ! 7
6 "1 ! "" ! ! & 1 ! "" 0! & 7" G! !"! ' 06!#6 ! "" 0
7 #6! & G #! ! & )+() 6 , 5 " 6! 6
!# ! 7 6 , 5 6 #6 7! ! "' 0
! # 6 , 5 1 ! ! # 6 &6 6 , 5 H
!# 11" " # "!#' 1 !" ))$ )+(. 6 , 5 0 ! !
' 7 6 7! , 5 A$ 06!#6 ! 6! 1 ' 7
6 1 ! 3 " ! 1 ' 6 !# " 7!" 7
6 ! 1 ! ' !# 6 ' 56 !# " !G
1 ! ! F 7 6 3 3 1 6 6 , 5 6 1 #!7!# ""'
#6 7 ## 6 1 ! 6 6! & 6 6 11 ! #
6 ! ! )($ )+(. 6 , 5 7!" (++ 1 & , , 0! 6
6 !# !# " 7!" 11 6 #" ! & ! $ 7 1 $
7 #8 0" & 6 , ! & 6 # 1 ! 7 !# "!#'
G#6 & $ 6 , 5 0!"" 8 6 !# 11" " "
56 , # ! ' "!# 1 $ 1 #!7!# ""' # ! " 8 @ ! & $ 6

& & ! " # 1 !& 7 1 1 ! ! # )+(+$ 06!#6 ! #"
"7 " 56 0 ! ! !" "" 7 6 #! !"
# ! ! " #" ! ! 7 " # 6 6 , 5 6 7!" ! # )++*
56 77 ! #" 7 !# "" & ! 7 " !"" 7 !# # ! ! !
! " ' 1 '#6! !# # ! $ /+) 1 ! ! ! 6
77 6 !"" & " # ! ! " ! " ' 1 '#6! !# # ! 06!#6 6
,3 5 >3 53, 7 6 1 # !1 ! 7 1 ! !# !
" ! & ! # 1 !& # ! ! " # 1! #' # ! " 8
# 7 # ! 7< !#
, + , 5 I J ! !
% % % " % 0
( , # " 1! "
) , # &! " !# "
/ 6 ' 1! !"' # !#
; @ ! ""! $ ' !"" !"' # !#
* ! ! & $@ " 77!#
. G1 $ 6 0 77!#
- , # " !# & '
, 5 I J %
%% ! 0
1 56 1! $6 06! "1 " 6
( & 56 1!
) , 3,!&6 56 1!
/ #6! & !# G#! ! &
; C "8! &
* @!#'#"! &
, 5 I J %
0
( !# 1 !" 7 !"
) 5 !" ! ! 1 ! 6
/ 5 ' 11 #8 8 #
; C "8
* 5 !# 1 " #
. " 1 8 06!" ! & 6 # 1
- 6
4 ) 3 /7 1!#8 ! < # 0! 6 ! &
9 ' < " @ 0! 6 ! ! & 6 " 0 11 &!
1 " : ! 4 % !
! % 0
( A 5 ,> @
) , 71 "1 1 ' "
/ , 7 11 ! ' # 1 "1 1 '$ ! $ #
" $ ! 7 ! $ ! # K ! #" ! & 06 " 1! & I 1
& 6'1 "J
; , 7 1 # ! 7 " 0 7 # ' " "K " # "$ $
7 "
* , 7 " ! 6!1 ! #" ! & 7
!"'K 7 ! K 1 7 ! "
. , 7 ! " 7 "!7 "1 0 " 8 0!
- , 7 7 7 ! 0 0 , # !
! & 56 7 6' !# " $
$ 3 6 &! & 7 $ ! ! ! ! $ ! # ! ! ! $
! & 7 ! & 1 "!# 1" # ! $
! " ! 7! "" # "1 1 ' !&6 $ # ! 7< !#
4 , 7 7 7 K # 1" ! 6 ! '
11 ! ' # 6! 1 " ! ()*+
$ , # $ '" ! 8! & ! ! 1 ! " " " 7
' 7 ! 0! 6 7 76
9 , 7 7 7 ' # ! 7 " ! 1 ! '
! 8 6 7 "6 # 1 " 0 77
(+ , 77 " # 1 ! 6!1$ # #8! & 7 !
(( , 7 ! 11 ! ! L
6% !
% 0
( 74 8 ! %
9 %
9 %% % "
) % 4 ! !
. ! 4 : ! % %
"
/ 74 8 - !
% ! ; < =
74 8 ! :
"
; ! )
4 ! % =
%% !
%
"
* % + >+( + " &,
# $ - / ! ? '
> + " "
. , (* !
% !
@ % % 3
) % % "
(** % % < A # " . ((* %
% % ?% $ ". %
% , $ ! " + % %
. % % )
% ! % % %
, - / $ ? & '" "" " M)/)$+++ ++ 6
G
6 < # 6! $ 6 $ G ! $ # ! 7
< !# 1 & ! # (94- N > 5 5 C ,,>
5 5 5 > 5 5 C , 5 5 5
, C 5 , 5 5 , 5 C 5 5
,> @
5 $ 5 , 5 , , $ 5 5 5
,, C @, , , > A 5 5
5,> , 5 5 5 > 5 5 , 5 $
5 C 5 5 5 @ 5 5 5 5 > >
5 5 , C
5 55 5 > 5 5
55
1 # 7 ""'$
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
$ ,! !&
%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !
()*+
, # $ (-.+/
000 &&" " ! & 1#
# 2& !" #
-(-3*)43))++
!# ! #" ! : 6 # ! 1 6 " $ 7 $
1 "!#"' ! # ! ! # (94- & ! & 1 "!# IC6! " @" 0 J 0! 6 "" & ! 7 ! # # 7
0! 6! ! " !& " "$ "# 7 , # $ I 1" & !" ' ""! & F !
6 7 !# M( @!""! ! (99)J 7 "' 0 7 # 7 1 ! 6
6 0! 6 6 ! 7 " 0 7 # 6 ! $ 06!#6 0 " ""' 1 # G1 1 "!#
# 1 ! C !"!P # !# ! 60 7 6 "! " "!#! #8 1 $
1 1 '$ ! C # ! 7!&6 7 < !# 6 &6 6 $ # !# !
7 1 # ! & !&6 # ! 1 ! 7 < !# # ! 1 ! "
7 6 ! 1"' !7 ' 0! 6 7 # ,! 0" &# , # '
, # ! ' 6! ! 3 1 ' C6! " @" 0! & 7 6 # "I 6 5
7 1 ! "JQ
5 5
+/3(.39+++* 77!# 7 6 ! # ! G # ! $ ! 56! ! # ! 7 11 " 3
, 5 , 5 @ , 5> +):B 5) B(K +/3(.39+++;. ,,
,, 5 5 5 5
1 (.3.4)) 5 5 C 5 5 $ 1 " 5) B(
69 1 % # # !
56! ! # ! 7 11 " $ 1 " 5): *B. $ 1 " 5) B( 57 ,! !#6 ""
, . +):B 57 ,! !#6 "" , K. 5) . )BB B
! !# ! !# 7 (.3;+(; 5 @ ! $ ". $
1 " 5) )B(. +) :(*B. B) ++( 57 ,! !#6 "" , K +) **. 5)B5+ *) (* K
! !# ! " ! !# 7 (.3 )*(/ 5 K (.3# 3(-*(
5 5 @
0 " 6 7 '" ! !#! " # @ N )+(.3;.) $
# $ $ %$ ? & , @ 0
'" ! 1 $ $ 1 " :+: 5. :+B 5K * 5 !# 7 D 6" D
1 ! 7 '" ! /*-* )+(. !# 7
D 6" D . ' 11 "$ 1 "
$?):5), ) () 5 7 D 6" D ((.; )+(.. $ 1 " +5 +.
+ ( +K (.3()(9 "! ! ' < # ! 7 )+(.
, # ' 7 " $ 1 " 5) +* + 4 .$ 1 " 5) *B 1 C1$ 61
? .$ 1 " +) 5 < $ .$ 1 " *) :: :. +) 5 . 5) ::B( $ ) 5) :B
@ 8 1 #' 7 56 ! !# 7 '" ! (-3(+.(*K $ 1 " 5) +
%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !
()*+
, # $
(-.+/
000 &&" " ! & 1#
# 2& !" #
-(-3*)43))++
)($ )+(-
5 5 @
5 5, D ,, , ,, 5
. - , 5
- )/ C, D ,, , $ #6 (/$ )+(-
4 4; 5 5, D ,, , $ '
(;$ )+(;
$ ,! !&
%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !
()*+
, # $ (-.+/
000 &&" " ! & 1#
# 2& !" #
-(-3*)43))++
!# ! #" ! : 6 # ! 1 6 " $ 7 $
1 "!#"' ! # ! ! # (94- & ! & 1 "!# IC6! " @" 0 J 0! 6 "" & ! 7 ! # # 7
0! 6! ! " !& " "$ "# 7 , # $ I 1" & !" ' ""! & F !
6 7 !# M( @!""! ! (99)J 7 "' 0 7 # 7 1 ! 6
6 0! 6 6 ! 7 " 0 7 # 6 ! $ 06!#6 0 " ""' 1 # G1 1 "!#
# 1 ! C !"!P # !# ! 60 7 6 "! " "!#! #8 1 $
1 1 '$ ! C # ! 7!&6 7 < !# 6 &6 6 $ # !# !
7 1 # ! & !&6 # ! 1 ! 7 < !# # ! 1 ! "
7 6 ! 1"' !7 ' 0! 6 7 # ,! 0" &# , # '
, # ! ' 6! ! 3 1 ' C6! " @" 0! & 7 6 # "I 6 5
7 1 ! "JQ
5 5
+/3(.39+++* 77!# 7 6 ! # ! G # ! $ ! 56! ! # ! 7 11 " 3
, 5 , 5 @ , 5> +):B 5) B(K +/3(.39+++;. ,,
,, 5 5 5 5
1 (.3.4)) 5 5 C 5 5 $ 1 " 5) B(
69 1 % # # !
56! ! # ! 7 11 " $ 1 " 5): *B. $ 1 " 5) B( 57 ,! !#6 ""
, . +):B 57 ,! !#6 "" , K. 5) . )BB B
! !# ! !# 7 (-34.- 5 @ $ "$ "! ! '
< # ! 7 > , K (.3;+(; 5 @ ! $ ". $ 1 " 5)
)B(. +) :(*B. B) ++( 57 ,! !#6 "" , K +) **. 5)B5+ *) (* K
! !# ! !# 7 N , 5 , , 5$ #6 4$ )+(-
6 1 (( @ 8 1 #' 11 "7 (-3(+.(*
! !# ! " ! !# 7 (.3 )*(/ 5 K (.3# 3(-*(
5 5 @
0 " 6 7 '" ! !#! " # @ N )+(.3;.) $
# $ $ %$ ? & , @ 0
'" ! 1 $ $ 1 " :+: 5. :+B 5K * 5 !# 7 D 6" D
1 ! 7 '" ! /*-* )+(. !# 7
D 6" D . ' 11 "$ 1 "
$?):5), ) () 5 7 D 6" D ((.; )+(.. $ 1 " +5 +.
+ ( +K (.3()(9 "! ! ' < # ! 7 )+(.
, # ' 7 " $ 1 " 5) +* + 4 .$ 1 " 5) *B 1 C1$ 61
? .$ 1 " +) 5 < $ .$ 1 " *) :: :. +) 5 . 5) ::B( $ ) 5) :B
@ 8 1 #' 7 56 ! !# 7 '" ! (-3(+.(*K $ 1 " 5) +
5 5 @
, 5
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
4 5 5 @ H C @ 5 N 000 &&" " ! & 1#
9 5 5 @ H > 5 @ ,3
6 1 :RR000 ' # R#6 "R CFPO 0"<* 7 < B
(+ 5 5 @ H 5C 55 3 6 1 :RR 0! # R
(( 5 5 @ H @ 5 3
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R *< *#
() 5 5 @ H , D 3 6 1 :RR000 "! 8 ! # R1 7!" R ! 0Q

! S;)9;*--*( 8S O 1 ! O O1 7!" O1!#
(/ 5 5 @ H > , 5
6 1:RR' "! # R
(; 5 5 @ H , 3
6 1 :RR #" # R 3# Q
O # S #" O# 1 !& S 6 O ! S 0!
)/ C, D ,, ,
() (-3# 34.-3 "! ! ' < # ! 7 & #' "! 7

5
5 , A @ 5 5 5, , 55 5 5 5 @ D C
5 ,!F ! ! 77 #6 )($ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;)*4(;4+R 3 3(-3# 34.-3 3 "! ! '3
< # ! 37 3 & #'3 "! 73 5 35 3 , 3 A @ 535 5, 3, 55 35 3
5 5 3@ D3 C3 53 3,!F ! !
(/ , 55 5 55 @ 5 5 $ 5$
5 5 #6 (/$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;(-/())-R, 3 3 !&63
! 3 3 553 5 ,3@ 356 3 356 7 3 73
! 3 #63(/3)+(-
(; , 5 , 5 T , 5 !" !
5 5 5 5 #6 ()$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;(.4())4R ,3 5 3
,3 5 T 3 , 53 !" 3! 3 3 3 5 3 5 53
53 #63()3)+(-
(* ! ' 7 6 3 # !
1 #6 ()$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;(.4((-4R ! '3 73 6 3 3
3 3 3 3 3 3 # 3 ! 3 13 #63()3)+(-
(. C D , D 5 (++ 5 5 ,
5 ,
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;(.4((.)R5 5 3 ,3
5 5 3 3, 5 3 3 " # 3C! 3 '3C D , D 3 #63
(+3)+(-
(- 5 (( (+.(* 5 ,5
, @ > )4$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;(*(99(*R 6 1 3((3(-3
(+.(* 3 5 3 3 ,35 3 3 3 5 53 53 35 3
5 3 5 53 3 >, 3 3 3 3 , 3
3 73 '3)4
(4 +)(+(3 53+++)(;3)+(. @> , 5 5> ,

5 , 5
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;()94)44R 5 3 3 5 @ 3 3
+)(+(3 53+++()(;3)+(.3 3 35 3, 3 3 '3 3
,,3 3 3 3 3 5 3 ,3 D 5 3
'3))3)+(
(9 5 5 @
5 5 5 4$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;()94)-9R # 3 ! 3 13
3 3 5 5 5 37 3 #6343)+(-
)+ 5 T , 5 @> 5 5 @
*$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;(+(4+))R 5 T 3 3 3
3 '3 3 3 3 3 #63)3)+(-3 3 3 3 3(.3

+4;-)3 >3 5 3 3 3 5 3 #63*3)+(-
)( , 55 5 5 C 5 D$ 55 > 55 5
5 , 5 5> D 5
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;+99.(+-R 3 3 3
, 55 3 3 6 03 3 !#83 3 5 3 3 3 3(-3+;.).3 #63
*3)+(-
)) 5 5 @ C , 5 5 5
5 5 5 (-34.- 5 @ $ "$
, > 5 > ,
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;+9)/;+)R 5 3 3 5 @ 3
C3 3 3 3(-3# 3++4.-3 3 "! ! '3 < # ! 37 3
>3 , 3! 3 3 3 5 3 ! !# 3 73 '" ! 3 #63;3)+
)/ D 5 , D , 5
5 > 5> 5 )$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;+4)/9/)R 1 ! 3 3 73
'" ! 3 3 3/*-*3 3)+(.3 5 >3 5>3 3
3 5 3 3 5 @ 3 3 #63)3)+(-
); 5 5 @ , 55 5 >, 5 5 , , 5
5 3 5 ,D , , 5 /$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;+4)/9/+R 5 3 3 5 @ 3
, 55 35 35 3 >, 3 5 5 3, , 5 3 #63/3)+(-
)* 5 5 @ 5 T 5 , 5 5>
5 , 3(-3++)+. @ 0
, @ 5@ D
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;+-/./*;R, 5 3 5>3
53 3 3 , 3 3 3 3(-3++)+.3 3 3@ C 3 3
"3 3 53 73 3 3 3 #63)3)+(-
). 5 T , 5 5 5, @> 5
5 @ ($ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;+.(4-))R 3! 3 3 '3
3 3 3 3 #63(3)+(-
)- , 55 5 55 , @@ 55 @ $
5 5 B
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;+;-94-)R, 55 35 3 @@ 3
3 '3)-3)+(-
)4 5 (( @
D 5 > (-3(+.(* 5
5 , ,
@ > ).$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;+;-94/4R 6 1 3((3(-3
(+.(* 3 5 3 3 5 3 3 3 , 3 3
3 @ >3(.3)+(-3 '3).3)+(-
)9 >, 5 5 , 5 +**-;.(-)3
+(+( , 5 5 @ > )4$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;+/*;/9/R >, 3
5 53 3 3 , 53 3 5 3 3 5 @ 3 3
, 3 @ 3+**-;.(-)3+(+(3+/+30! 63 53 '3)*3)+(-
/+ 5 5 @ , 5 5> 5 ,
3+43(//-/ 5 5 , "$
' )*$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;+/*;/4-R, # 3 '3 3
3 3+43 3(//-/3 3 35 3 3 5 3 '3)*3
)+(-
/( >, 5 5 , 5 +**-;.(-)3
+(+( , 5 5 @ > )4$ )+(- C 5
5 T 5
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/;+)-44.;R >, 3
5 53 3 3 , 53 3 5 3 3 5 @ 3 3
, 3 @ 3+**-;.(-)3+(+(3+/+30! 63 5 T 3 53
'3)*3)+
/) 5 5 @ 5 T 5 , 5 5>
5 , 3(-3++)+. @ 0
B 5 @
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//9-)9-;-R 5 3 3
, 5 3 5>3 53 3 3 , 3 3 3 3(-3++)+.3
3 3@ C 3 3 "3 B 53 3 3 3 3@ 3
// 5 5 @ , 55 5 >, 5 5 , , 5
5 3 5 ,D , , 5 @ > (*$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//9;)(((.R 5 3 3 5 @ 3
, 55 35 35 3 >, 3 5 5 3, , 5 3 '3(*3)+(-
/; 5 5 @ H 5 5 > ()*+ 5 5 5
$, 5 $ >, @ > (;$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//9//-(4+R 5 3 3 5 @ 3
()*+3 53 5 53, 5 3 3 5 >3 '3(;3)+(-
4; 5 5, D ,, ,
( @ 5@ @ $ " "!# 7 7 ! & $

, " 6 $ , ' )+$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//-+-)*(9R 3 3 "3 "!#3
7 37 3 3 ! & 3 3, " 3 6 3 3 3 3
, 3 '3)+3)+(-
) 5 5 @ D 5 , D 1 ! 7
'" ! /*-* )+(. > > )+$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//-()+()-R 5 3 5 @ 3 3
3 3D 5 , 3D 3 1 ! 3 3 73 '" ! 3 3 3/*-*3 3
)+(.3 >3 >3)+3)+(-
/ C 5, @, C D 5 C 5 5 5 @ N ! ! # ! 7
" # !# # " $ ' (($ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//.)*.9;/RC 5, @, C 3D 3
5 C 53 3 5 3 5 @ 3 3 ! 3 ! # ! 3 73 " # !#3 3
# " 3 '3((3)+(-
; 56 1 ! ! ! # ! 7 5 , 0! 6 6 &3 "8! &

&
6 1 :RR000 "! 8 ! # R1 " R 1 ! ! 3 ! # ! 3# ! "1 3# 1 3
1 & 3 3#
* ! : ! @" #8 0 0 U 5 "8 5 , ! ' 7

!"" #
6 1:RR000 ! 1 0 # R ! 3 ! 3 " #8 3 3 0 3 0 3 "83
3# ! "1 36! '3 73 3 !"" # R));)))R
. , : 0 1 ' 6 @ ! ! $ 6!" "16! 7 6

! !P ! ! !& 6 @ ! (9-(
6 1:RR000 16!""' # R16!""'R 1! ! R)+(-+((9O, OO 0 O O1
6 "
- , & " 1"!# ! 7 6 ! !# 0 @ 7 6 '

6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//.-4-/+)R, & "3 1"!# ! 3 73 6 3(9*93
! 3 !# 0 3@ 3 73 6 3 3 3 '3 '3(-3)+(-
5 5 D C 5 5
5 53 ,
4 & C "8 " ! & "' - (99( 1

6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R)-+).-/.4R & 3 3C "8 3
" ! &3 "'3-3(99(3 1
9 56 ! 6 0 # ! # "731 #" ! 1 '#6!# 6 1 " !"! !

6 1 :RR000 0 6! & 1 # R 0 R1 3 ! R01R)+(-R+(R(9R 6 3 ! 3
6 3#! 30 3# ! # 3 3 "731 #" ! 31 '#6!#36 31 "3 !"! ! RQ
1 6 S4;)(;4;4;;+9*/+9 ! S O 0 O S ;4- . ++ -
(+ H ! & " & #' ' 6 "! 6 7 6

!"" #
6 1:RR000 ! ! ! # R 3 3 ! &3" & #'3 6 3 3 3
!"" # 3 3)+(-3(
(( 56 G ! 7 ))+ !"" $ & $ ' 5 ,

' (-$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//.4/))(;R56 3 G ! 3 73))+3 3 !""3
3 & 3 3 '3 5 , 3 3 '3(-3)+(-
() , , > 5 5 5> 1 !" (.$ (99( #$

' (-$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//.-4-49-R 3, ,3 > 5 3
5 5> 3 3 3 1 !"3(.3(99(3 3 3 #3 '3(-3)+(-
(/ $ "" 7 7" # $ # $ (99/ (994 ' (-$

)+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//.-4--/9R 3 3 3 "" 3 73
7" 3 # 3 #3(99/3 3(9943 '3(-3)+(-
(; , "16 PP #6! 6 " 1 " ' # !

1 ' (-$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//.-4-;(.R 3, 3 3 "163 PP #6!3
6 " 3 3 1 "3 '3 # 3 ! 3 13 3 3 3 3 '3
(-3)+(-
(* @)@ " ! & (999 )++) ' (.$ )+(-

6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//.-4-/+/R@)@3 " ! &3 3(9993 3)++)3
'3(.3)+(-
(. (999 G# " ! " # @ ! " ' ' (.$ )+(-

6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//.-(9.)-R(9993 G# " ! 3 " # 3@ ! 3 " 3
'3 3 3 3 '3(.3)+(-
(- 5 , " ! & (999 )++) ' (.$

)+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//.-/4-*+R 3 3 3 3 5 ,3
3 " ! &3 3(9993 3)++)3 '3(.3)+(-
(4 ! #! " 1 @ #6 &! " & 1 '

' (.$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//.-+;4;)R 3 ! #! "3 13@ #6 3 3
3 &! "3 3 & 3 13 '3 3 3 3 '3(.3)+(-
(9 5 5 @ 5 5 C 5 ,
' (*$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//../-(-9R*.3 5 3 3 5 @ 3 3
3 3 53 5 3C 5 3 , 3 3 '3(*3)+(-
)+ ! ! " & & @ 8! & @ ! " 1 7 (94- '

(*$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//../-(-4R*43 ! ! "3 3 & & 3
@ 8! &3@ ! 3 " 1 3 73(94-3 '3(*3)+(-
)( (94- 5 5 35 ' @ &! !$ 0 ! ! $ " 6 !"

0! 6 ' (*$ )+(-
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//../-(-.R**3(94-3 53 5 35 '3
@ &! !3 0 3 ! 3 ! 3 3 " 63 !" 30! 63 3 3 3 '3
(*3)+(-
)) 5 5 @ H ! #! " & 1$ , $ !35 ,! !& ! !"

7 # (-$ )+(*
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R//../-(-/R*-3 5 3 3 5 @ 3 3 ! #! "3
& 3 13, 3 !35 3,! !& ! 3 !" 3 73 # 3(-3)+(*
)/ , 5 ,, , 5 5 ' ""!& #
& #! ()$ )+(.
6 1 :RR000 # ! # R # R/)9-.(**-R , 3 53 3 ,, ,3
5 5 3 '3 3 3 ""!& # 3 & #! 3 3 3 3 1 3 ! 3 "3
3 3)3)+(.
); , B 57 5 5 7 6 # 7 ,! !#6 "" ,
! $ (*$ )+(.
)* 7"!# C! 6 6 5 1 ! ! ! 3 '
(;$ )+(. V " " ! # V !"! '
). 5 5 @ 6 5 5 7 # ! # 7
1! #' ' ()$ )+(.
)- " @ 8 / 6 ! ! '@ 8 7 " ! #! " C! 6

! !" # ! ! " #6 7 ' 9$ )+(. V
)4
)9 , '$ ! # 7 @ ! "1 # !#
' )4$ )+(. V "@ 7 !& ! V " ""!& #
& #'
/+ 5 ,,> 5 5 3 , 55 5 11 "" "$ ,, 7

@ $ ! ' )*$ )+(.
/( 1 7 &" " RD 6" D ! 7 0 " 6 !"

' ))$ )+(. "! 6 ' V
/) , & " 1 ! 56 ! V ! ! , 0
// , # ' !#8 ' ' 56 ! 7 1 ! "!#
/; !# ! 3 5 @ , # ! ' "!# @ $ "$ ))$

)+(. V " ""!& # & #'
/* 6 1 () 3 > , 5 ,, 5 6 1 (( 3 @ ,,$
7 ""! 5 ! ! !# $ ' 6 "" 1' !&6 )++9W
/. V & V "@ 7 !& !
/- $ $ C ,, , 55 (949 # ).$ )+(. V

!# V
/4 5 55 ! 7 ! (94- 5 >
! ' # (.$ )+(.
/9 5 , 5 3 5 , 5 ,, 5 5>
, 5 $ ' 56 # ! 1$ # (*$ )+(. V " !#
& !P !
;+ & ! !# 7 000 &&" " ! & 1# 5 5 , 5 ,>

' 7 )+(. ' )+(- 3 ' (+$ )+(-
;( ' ! "" & " !" ! ,! 7 6! !# ! 7 ! " ,! ! & !

6! C6 # 1! 83 & )4$ )+(.
;) 5 ! 5 D 53, )++; 5 )+(- ,5

5 D ' 9$ )+(-
;/ , 5 5 > , ,5 5 5 @ )++*
5 )+(. ' .$ )+(-
;; !#! !
;* 5 5 5 5 5 5 @ , # ! ' "!# 1
! !# +43# 3+494) # )4$ )+(.
;. # ! *+; 7 56 6 !"! ! # V 6 !"! ! # 7 (9-/
;- 5 3 A , 5 # !1 7 C6! " " 0 5 ! ! 5 &

! ! " 7 1 ! " " ! & , # $
# )-$ )+(.
;4 5
;9 50! :X H ! & , 5 ,, ,
5 5 ' ""!& # 2 # ! Y 6 1 :RR # R5/ 9 >
Z X
*+ , # ' +43 3(//-/ 5 5

> 5 @ ' )/$ )+(-
*( , '$ ! # 7 @ @!""! & !#

C ' /+$ )+(.
*) D 6' ! ID 5 , 5 @ 0 J
!" @! " #6 (+$ )++*
*/ 56 1 ! ! ! # ! 7 5 , 0! 6 6 &3 "8! &

& 3, # ! ' "!# &!# " $ & );$ )+(.
*; , 5 5> 5 , 3(-3++)(+ 3(-3

++)+. @ C @ C $ "$
** B 5 @ ' )*$ )+(- 1 7 V !#

! V ! " # ! ' & #'
*. !"' 7 D "! "" 7!" ! & ! !"" !"" ! ! '$ 6 K # "" 6

1 " ' )*$ )+(- V , 0 7 # V
*- 6 1 (( @ 8 1 #' !"" ! ' )-$ )+(-
*4 @ D 5 > 5 , 55 C (-3(+.(*3 75
& 6"! & ! ' ' )-$ )+(-
*9 6 1 (( @ 8 1 #' (-3(+.(* & 6"! & !"

' )-$ )+(- 3 , V " V 7 !
.+ , # ' +43 3(//-/ A @ 5 5 , 5

> 5 5 @ 7 ' )4$ )+(- 3 " # !# ""' 7!" V
"@ 7 !& ! V
.( 5 5 (-+(3+)9;.4 , 5 5> , 5
5 > > )4$ )+(-
.) , # ' +43 3(//-/ 5 , 5

' )9$ )+(- 3 , , 5 ,,> ' )9$ )+(-
./ 0 @ 8 3 C!8!1 !
.; (.3# 3)*(/ "! ! ' < # ! 7 & #' "! 7 ! ! " ! !# 5

,5 5 5 ' ).$ )+(- V 7 !
.* 0 6 11"!# ! !" 7 4$ )+(* 3 5 , A5 5

, ,5 ' /+$ )+(-
.. " ' $ $ 56! ! # ! @ 5 5 5 ,

5 @ , 5> 7 ' ($ )+(-
.- , 5 $ , > 5 >
, 5 5 5 7 >, C! 6 ! !" 6 3
' )$ )+(-
.4 6 1 (( @ 8 1 #' (-3(+.(* @ 55 , @ >/3 '

)$ )+(-
.9 ' # 6!"" " 5 1 6 !"! '3 ! " 1" G 3 5 6 !&

! ! 0 0! 6 #5 ! $ 6 ! !& ! < "! " ! # 6
-+ !& !7!# # 7 6 ! ! @ ! ' 3 )+(-R+)R+)
-( '" ! "!# ,!F " 7 # " 1" ! 5

C 5 C , 5 @ $ & ()$ )+(. V , 0 ! V ! 7
11 "
-) 3(.3+4;-) > 5 5 3
, # ' 7 " 1 )($ )+(. 3 , 5
5 5 V
-/ 5 , C 6 ! 3 C!8!1 ! '
$ ' ;$ )+(-
-; 3(.3+4;-) D 5 5 ' /$ )+(- 5 , C 6 !

3 C!8!1 ! ' $ ' ;$
)+(-
-* , 0 3 5 5 , 5 5> , 5 5 , 3
' ;$ )+(-
-. , 55 0 C "" @ ! ' 1 6!1 ' ;$ )+(-
-4 (.3 3)*(/ "! ! ' < # ! 7 > , ! ! " ! !#

' D 5 5 5 5 , ' /($ )+(-
-9 '" ! !#! " # @ , 55 )+(.3-44 I 0 6J )+(.3-49

I ! 8 J ' )$ )+(-
4+ 6 1 (( (-3(+.(* 7 T 5 , ' -$ )+(- V @ 8 1 #' V

6 1
4( 6 1 (( (-3(+.(* 5 5 @ 5 (( T 5 ,
, 5 5 5 ' -$ )+(-
4) 56! ! # ! ! & ' 5 1@ '$ 06 ! ! "

5 1 F K " ! $ #! 6! 0 8 & ! # ! 6 #6$ "! F ! 6! &
6 77 #6 1! ! & #6 " 6 # 6! '
4/ 5 5 @ (4$ )++4 ! !# +43+)94) 5 @

, # ! ' "!# @ $ "$ , V 1" !
4; 5 5 @ 3+)(+(3 53++++;-+3)+(- 5 5 5 3 5
5 ' ()$ )+(-
THE ACTS COMMITED AGAINST ME, STAN J. CATERBONE ARE ILLEGAL AND CRIMINAL!
PROTHONOTARY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Katherine Wood-Jacobs George Alspach
Prothonotary Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
Case Number
vs.
CI-16-08472
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL (et al.)
PROTHONOTARY DOCKET ENTRIES

09/22/2016 COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, IN PRO SE
09/22/2016 CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE VS. LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL; ABBEYVILLE
FAMILY MEDICINE; PATIENT FIRST URGENT CARE; SOUTHEAST MEDICAL; MEDEXPRESS
URGENT CARE; LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AND THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT
10/03/2016 MOTION FOR A 30-DAY CONTINUANCE, FILED
10/03/2016 EXHIBIT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE IN PRO SE
10/31/2016 CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ASHWORTH
11/15/2016 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FILED
February 03, 2017
THIS IS HOW THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER KEEPS ME CRIPPLED

AND TORTURES ME - BY JUDGE DAVID ASHWORTH REFUSING
TO MAKE A RULING ON THIS CASE - CLASSIC TORTURE BY DEFINITION
CI-16-08472 INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF Page 1 of 16

(c) CountySuite Prothonotary, Teleosoft, Inc.
Saturday February 4, 2017
Torture and the United States - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torture_and_the_United_States
Torture and the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Torture and the United States includes documented and alleged cases of torture both inside and outside the United States by members of the U.S. government,
the U.S. military, U.S. law enforcement agencies, U.S. intelligence agencies, U.S. health care services, and other U.S. public organizations.
While the term "torture" is defined in numerous places, including dictionaries and encyclopedias of various nations or cultures, this article only addresses the
legal definition of the term, under the codified and case law of the United States of America.[nb 1] After the U.S. dismissed United Nations concerns about
torture in 2006,[1] one UK judge observed 'America's idea of what is torture ... does not appear to coincide with that of most civilized nations'.[2] A two-year
study by U.S. independent group The Constitution Project concluded that it was "indisputable" that U.S. forces had employed torture as well as "cruel, inhuman
or degrading treatment" in many interrogations; that "the nation's most senior officials" bear ultimate responsibility for allowing and contributing to the spread
of these techniques, and that there is substantial evidence that information obtained by these methods was neither useful nor reliable.[3]
Contents
1 Legislation, regulation, and treaties regarding torture
1.1 Prohibition under domestic law
1.1.1 Bill of Rights
1.1.2 18 U.S.C. 2340 (the "Torture Act")
1.1.3 Military Commissions Act of 2006
1.1.4 U.S. Army Field Manuals
1.2 Prohibition under international law
2 Historical practices of torture
2.1 Slavery
2.2 Lynching
2.3 "Third degree"
2.4 World War 2
2.5 Torture abroad during the Cold War
2.6 Torture (Countries With U.S. training) Post World War II to 1975
2.6.1 U.S. intelligence training manuals
3 Domestic torture in modern times
3.1 Domestic police and prisons
3.1.1 Police brutality
3.1.2 Prisoner abuse
3.2 Border Patrol and immigration detention
4 Torture abroad
4.1 Khalid el-Masri
4.2 Forms of torture and abuse
4.3 Application of Fifth Amendment to overseas torture
4.4 Torture, interrogation and prisons in the War on Terror
4.4.1 "Stress and duress"
4.4.2 Legal analyses
4.4.3 Authorization and methods of torture and abuse
4.5 Secret detention facilities
4.6 Torture and extraordinary rendition
4.7 Protests
5 United Nations Convention Against Torture
5.1 History of U.S. Accession
5.2 Ratification
5.3 Evidence of violations
6 U.S. case law on the convention
6.1 Burden of proof
6.2 In re M-B-A
6.3 Defining "torture"
6.4 Matter of J-E
7 See also
8 Notes
9 References
10 Further reading
11 External links
Legislation, regulation, and treaties regarding torture

Torture is illegal and punishable within U.S. territorial bounds. Prosecution of abuse occurring on foreign soil, outside of usual U.S. territorial jurisdiction, is
FEDERAL TORTURE
CI-16-08472 INJUNCTION
LAWSFOR EMERGENCY RELIEF
Page 2
1 of 16
14 Saturday February 4, 2017
1 of 14 2/4/2017 1:33 AM
difficult.
Prohibition under domestic law
Bill of Rights
It is debated as to whether or not torture as a punishment falls under the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment to the United States
Constitution. The text of the Amendment states that:
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
The U.S. Supreme Court has held since at least the 1890s that punishments which involved torture are forbidden under the Eighth Amendment.[4]
18 U.S.C. 2340 (the "Torture Act")
An act of torture committed outside the United States by a U.S. national or a non-U.S. national who is present in the United States is punishable under 18
U.S.C. 2340 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2340). The definition of torture used is as follows:
As used in this chapter
(1) torture means an act committed by a person acting under the color of law specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain
or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control;
(2) severe mental pain or suffering means the prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting from
(A) the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering;
(B) the administration or application, or threatened administration or application, of mind-altering substances or other procedures
calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality;
(C) the threat of imminent death; or
(D) the threat that another person will imminently be subjected to death, severe physical pain or suffering, or the administration or
application of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personality; and
(3) United States means the several states of the United States, the District of Columbia, and the commonwealths, territories, and
possessions of the United States.
Military Commissions Act of 2006
In October 2006, the United States enacted the Military Commissions Act of 2006, authorizing the President to conduct military tribunals of enemy combatants
and to hold them indefinitely without judicial review under the terms of habeas corpus. Testimony coerced through humiliating or degrading treatment would be
admissible in the tribunals. Amnesty International and numerous commentators have criticized the Act for approving a system that uses torture, destroying the
mechanisms for judicial review created by Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, and creating a parallel legal system below international standards.[5][6][7] Part of the act was an
amendment that retroactively rewrote the War Crimes Act, effectively making policy makers (i.e., politicians and military leaders), and those applying policy
(i.e., Central Intelligence Agency interrogators and U.S. soldiers), no longer subject to legal prosecution under U.S. law for what, before the amendment, was
defined as a war crime, such as torture.[8] Because of that, critics describe the MCA as an amnesty law for crimes committed during the War on Terror.[9][10]
U.S. Army Field Manuals
In late 2006, the military issued updated U.S. Army Field Manuals on intelligence collection (FM 2-22.3. Human Intelligence Collector Operations
(http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm2-22-3.pdf), September 2006) and counterinsurgency (FM 3-24. Counterinsurgency (http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir
/army/fm3-24.pdf), December 2006). Both manuals reiterated that "no person in the custody or under the control of DOD, regardless of nationality or physical
location, shall be subject to torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, in accordance with and as defined in U.S. law."[11] Specific
techniques prohibited in the intelligence collection manual include:
Forcing the detainee to be naked, perform sexual acts, or pose in a sexual manner;
Hooding, that is, placing hoods or sacks over the head of a detainee; using duct tape over the eyes;
Applying beatings, electric shock, burns, or other forms of physical pain;
Waterboarding;
Using military working dogs;
Inducing hypothermia or heat injury;
Conducting mock executions;
Depriving the detainee of necessary food, water, or medical care.[12]
Prohibition under international law
Torture in all forms is banned by the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which the United States participated in drafting. The United States
is a party to the following conventions (international treaties) that prohibits torture, such as the 1949 Geneva Conventions (signed 1949; ratified 1955), the
American Convention on Human Rights (signed 1977), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (signed 1977; ratified 1992), and the United
Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (signed 1988; ratified 1994). It has neither signed nor
FEDERAL TORTURE
Page 3
2 of 16
2 of 14 2/4/2017 1:33 AM
ratified the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture.[13] International law defines torture during an armed conflict as a war crime. It also
mandates that any person involved in ordering, allowing, and even insufficiently preventing and prosecuting war crimes is criminally liable under the command
responsibility doctrine.
Historical practices of torture

Slavery
People living as slaves were regulated both in their service and when walking in public by legally authorized violence. On large
plantations, slave overseers were authorized to whip and brutalize noncompliant slaves. Slave codes authorized, indemnified or
even required the use of violence and were long criticized by abolitionists for their brutality. Slaves as well as free Blacks were
regulated by the Black Codes, and had their movements regulated by patrollers, conscripted from the white population, who were
allowed to use summary punishment against escapees, which included maiming or killing them.
Lynching
Lynching was a public act of murder, torture, and mutilation carried out by crowds, primarily against African Americans. A form of
mob violence and social control, usually involving (but by no means restricted to) the illegal hanging and burning of suspected
criminals, lynch law cast its pall over the Southern United States from the mid-19th to the mid-20th centuries. Victims were usually
black men, often accused of acting uppity towards (being insolent), assaulting, having sex with, or raping white people.
The documented murders of 4,743 people who were lynched in the United States between 1882 and 1968 were not often
publicized. It is likely that many more unrecorded lynchings occurred during and after this period which influenced The Great Peter, aka Gordon, a
Migration of 6.5 million African Americans away from southern states. A 1970s lynching site found in Noxubee County, slave from Louisiana,
Mississippi, a location central to regional mob violence, belies the continuation of lynching as a torture method. 1863. The scars are a
result of a whipping by
Most lynchings were inspired by unsolved crime, racism, and innuendo. 3,500 of its victims were African Americans. Lynchings his overseer, who was
took place in every state except four, but were concentrated in the Cotton Belt (Mississippi, Georgia, Alabama, Texas and subsequently discharged.
Louisiana).[14] Forms of violence and torture also included genital mutilation, strangulation, maiming and the severing of limbs. It took two months to
Both police and lawmakers, and later federal agents, were frequently complicit in lynching while affiliated with Ku Klux Klan recover from the beating.
groups, releasing prisoners to lynch crowds and/or refusing to prosecute the participants in a public act of murder. Despite
numerous attempts to do so, federal anti-lynching legislation was consistently defeated.[15]
"Third degree"
The use of "third degree interrogation" techniques in order to compel confession, ranging from "psychological duress such as prolonged confinement to extreme
violence and torture", was widespread and considered acceptable in early American policing.[16]:47 In 1910 the direct application of physical violence in order
to force a confession became a media issue and some courts began to deny obviously compelled confessions.[17]:42 In response to this, "covert third degree
torture" became popular, since it left no signs of physical abuse. The publication of the Wickersham Commission's "Report on Lawlessness in Law
Enforcement" in 1931 highlighted the widespread use of covert third degree torture by the police to force confessions, and led to a subsequent decline in its use
over the 1930s and 1940s.[17]:38
World War 2
During World War II, the U.S. military interrogated high-level Nazis at a secret camp, "P. O. Box 1142," outside Washington D.C. The interrogators did not use
physical torture, but did use psychological tricks, like threatening to turn the prisoner over to the Soviets.[18]
Some captured German U-boat crewmen were subjected to "shock interrogation" techniques, including exhausting physical exercise and beatings, after their
capture during Operation Teardrop.
After the war, in 1948, the United States Air Force invited German Luftwaffe interrogator Hanns Scharff to brief them on his interrogation techniques, which
did not use physical means to obtain information.
Torture abroad during the Cold War
American officials were involved in counter-insurgency programs in which they encouraged their allies, such as the ARVN to use torture, and actively
participated in it, during the 1960s to the 1980s. From 1967 to at least 1972, the Central Intelligence Agency coordinated the Phoenix Program, which targeted
the infrastructure of the Communist National Front for the Liberation of South Vietnam ("Viet Cong"). The program killed 26,000 Viet Cong and captured over
60,000.[19] Critics of the program assert that many of those identified by the program as Viet Cong members were actually civilians, who when captured
suffered torture by the South Vietnamese Army, under CIA supervision.
American trainers and intelligence coordination officials supported the internal security apparatus of the regimes of South America's southern cone as those
regimes carried out kidnappings, "disappearances", torture and assassinations during the 1970s and 1980s as part of Operation Condor.[20][21][22] Similar
support was provided to right-wing governments of Central America, particularly in the 1980s. Numerous participants in these abuses were trained by the U.S.
Army School of the Americas.[23] Americans were present as supervisors in the Mariona Prison in San Salvador, El Salvador, well known for a wide variety of
forms of torture.[24] One author, Jennifer Harbury, focussing on Central America, concluded that "A review of the materials leads relentlessly to just one
conclusion: that the CIA and related U.S. intelligence agencies have since their inception engaged in the widespread practice of torture, either directly or
through well-paid proxies."[25]
FEDERAL TORTURE
Page 4
3 of 16
3 of 14 2/4/2017 1:33 AM
In 2014, a report by Brazil's National Truth Commission asserted that the United States government was involved in teaching torture techniques to the Brazilian
military government of 1964-85.[26]
Torture (Countries With U.S. training) Post World War II to 1975
Torture Countries identified by Amnesty International.[27]

Torture Country U.S.-trained Military/Police U.S. military Aid (19461975) $US(1979)
Greece 14,144 2,794,900,000
Portugal 2,997 361,900,000
Spain 9,872 920,200,000
Turkey 18,900 4,576,400,00
Indonesia 4,757 218,200,000
Philippines 15,245 805,800,000
South Korea 32,479 6,542,300,000
South Vietnam 35,788 16,490,500,000
Iran 10,807 1,412,500,000
Saudi Arabia 1,380 295,900,000
Morocco 2,209 138,700,000
Tunisia 636 62,400,000
Venezuela 5,341 142,200,000
Uruguay 2,537 85,900,000
Paraguay 1,435 26,400,000
Peru 6,734 193,500,000
Nicaragua 4,897 25,500,000
Mexico 738 14,300,000
Haiti 567 4,200,000
Guatemala 3,030 39,300,000
Dominican Republic 3,705 38,200,000
Colombia 6,200 154,800,00
Chile 6,328 216,900,000
Brazil 8,448 603,100,00
Bolivia 3,956 56,600,000
Argentina 3,676 230,300,000
Source: The Washington Connection and Third World Fascism, Chomsky N, Herman ES, Spokesman (1979), ISBN 0-89608-090-0, pg 361.
U.S. intelligence training manuals
The Torture Manuals was a nickname for seven training manuals that had excerpts declassified to the public on September 20, 1996, by the Pentagon.
One was the 1963 CIA document, KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation, which describes interrogation techniques, including, among other things,
"coercive counterintelligence interrogation of resistant sources." The CIA techniques involved were used in the CIA's Phoenix Program in South Vietnam.
Eventually the CIAs psychological methods were spread worldwide through the U.S. Agency for International Developments Public Safety program and U.S.
Army Mobile Training Teams.[28]
Other manuals were prepared by the U.S. military and used between 1987 and 1991 for intelligence training courses at the U.S. Army School of the Americas
(SOA). The manuals were also distributed by Special Forces Mobile Training teams to military personnel and intelligence schools in Colombia, Ecuador, El
Salvador, Guatemala, and Peru.
The manuals advise that torture techniques can backfire and that the threat of pain is often more effective than pain itself. The manuals describe coercive
techniques to be used "to induce psychological regression in the subject by bringing a superior outside force to bear on his will to resist." These techniques
include prolonged constraint, prolonged exertion, extremes of heat, cold, or moisture, deprivation of food or sleep, disrupting routines, solitary confinement,
threats of pain, deprivation of sensory stimuli, hypnosis, and use of drugs or placebos.[29]
In a July 2002 memo sent to the Pentagon's chief lawyer by the military's Joint Personnel Recovery Agency, or JPRA, the military agency that provided advice
on harsh interrogation techniques for use against terrorism suspects, not only referred to the application of extreme duress as "torture" but warned that it would
produce "unreliable information".[30][31]
See also Office of Public Safety.
FEDERAL TORTURE
Page 5
4 of 16
4 of 14 2/4/2017 1:33 AM
Domestic torture in modern times
Domestic police and prisons
Police brutality
In more modern policing, police brutality has involved torture. Police officials have generally described these cases as
aberrations or the actions of criminals in police uniform, as New York City Police Commissioner Howard Safir described the
attack on Abner Louima.[32] Police brutality critics, such as law professor Susan Bandes, have argued that such a view is
erroneous and that it "allows police brutality to flourish in a number of ways, including making it easier to discount individual
stories of police brutality, and weakening the case for any kind of systemic reform."[33]
In the 1970s and 80s the Chicago Police Department's Area 2 unit under Commander Jon Burge repeatedly used electroshock,
near-suffocation by plastic bags and excessive beating on suspects. The City of Chicago's Office of Professional Standards
(OPS) concluded that the physical abuse was systematic and, "The type of abuse described was not limited to the usual beating,
but went into such esoteric areas as psychological techniques and planned torture."[34]
In 1997, Abner Louima was sodomized with a plunger by New York City police.[35] The officer was convicted and sentenced to Prisoners at a whipping post
30 years in prison in a Delaware prison, c.
1907.
In May 2006 in Geneva, Switzerland the United Nations Committee against Torture released a report, which took note of the
"limited investigation and lack of prosecution" in connection to accusations of torture in Areas 2 and 3 of the Chicago Police
Department and called on American authorities to "promptly, thoroughly and impartially" investigate the accusations, and provide
the committee with more information.[36][37]
In 1983 Texas sheriff James Parker and three of his deputies were convicted for conspiring to use waterboarding to force
confessions. The complaint said they "subject prisoners to a suffocating water torture ordeal in order to coerce confessions. This
generally included the placement of a towel over the nose and mouth of the prisoner and the pouring of water in the towel until the
prisoner began to move, jerk, or otherwise indicate that he was suffocating and/or drowning."[38] The sheriff was sentenced to ten
years in prison, and the deputies to four years.[38][39]
In September 1997, two former officers from the Adelanto Police Department, San Bernardino County, California, were jailed for
two years on federal charges, after pleading guilty to beating a suspect during questioning and forcing another man to lick blood off
the floor in 1994.[40]
Water torture in Sing
According to the Innocence Project, about 25 percent of wrongfully convicted innocent people were coerced into making false Sing, New York, 1890.
confessions or false incriminating statements.[41] Most of the victims were threatened by the terror of harsher sentences if they
remained non-compliant.
Prisoner abuse
In 2005, a Channel 4 documentary "Torture: Americas Brutal Prisons" showed video of naked prisoners being beaten, bitten by
dogs, and stunned with Taser guns and electric cattle prods.[42] In one case a prisoner is strapped to a restraint chair and left for
sixteen hours; two hours after being unshackled he dies from a blood clot. In another, mentally ill prisoner Charles Agster is Human rights critics have
suffocated to death. Another prisoner is found with a broken neck, broken toes and internal injuries following an argument with called the use of restraint
guards; after one month in a coma he dies from septicaemia. Fire extinguisher sized canisters of pepper spray are used to cover chairs at Guantanamo
prisoners with chemicals, and they are then left, resulting in second degree burns. Photos are shown of Frank Valdes, a convicted Bay for force-feeding a
killer on Death Row, who was beaten to death after writing to local Florida newspapers with allegations of prison officer corruption form of torture.
and brutality. Many of the segments in the documentary were several years old, e.g. from 1996, and were originally released to
lawyers seeking justice for the victims of the offenses shown. Several Lawsuits was filed against the Prison which resulted in the
Inmates . Other prison officers involved in the incidents were suspended from duty or discharged of their employment.
A 2010 memoir by Wilbert Rideau, an inmate at Angola Prison from 1961 through 2001, states that "slavery was commonplace in Angola with perhaps a
quarter of the population in bondage" throughout the 1960s and early 1970s.[43] The New York Times states that weak inmates served as slaves who were raped,
gang-raped, and traded and sold like cattle. Rideau stated that "The slave's only way out was to commit suicide, escape or kill his master."[43] Herman Wallace
and Albert Woodfox, members of the Angola 3, arrived at Angola in the late 1960s and became active members of the prison's chapter of the Black Panther
Party, where they organized petitions and hunger strikes to protest conditions at the prison and helped new inmates protect themselves from rape and
enslavement.[44] C. Murray Henderson, one of the wardens brought in to clean up the prison, states in one of his memoirs that the systemic sexual slavery was
sanctioned and facilitated by the prison guards.[45]
From the year 2000 onwards, the Supermax facility at the Maine State Prison was the scene of video-taped forcible extractions that Lance Tapley in the Portland
Phoenix wrote "look[ed] like torture."[46] Additionally, audio recordings were made of the torture of Lester Siler in Campbell County, Tennessee. Officers
involved in the incident were convicted in court and sentenced to 25 years in prison
Border Patrol and immigration detention
The U.S. Border Patrol interdicts people crossing the border and maintains checkpoints and carries out raids in border regions. Human Rights Watch has
documented severe human rights abuses by the Border Patrol, "including unjustified killing, torture, and rape, and routine beatings, rough physical treatment,
FEDERAL TORTURE
Page 6
5 of 16
5 of 14 2/4/2017 1:33 AM
and racially motivated verbal abuse."[47]
Detained immigrants, including refugees seeking asylum, at the Esmor Inc. facility in Elizabeth, New Jersey, rebelled after practices of verbal and physical
abuse, humiliation and corporal punishment. After the uprising, two dozen of them were beaten, stripped, forced to crawl through a gauntlet of officers, and
made to chant, America is number one.[48]
A report by the Justice Department Office of the Inspector General on the experience of 762 post-9/11 detainees found confirmed the physical and verbal abuse
of detainees. On arrival at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York, the detainees were slammed face first into a wall against a shirt with an
American flag; the bloodstain left behind was described by one officer as the print of bloody noses and a mouth. Once inside they were threatened with
detention for the rest of their lives, verbally abused, exposed to cold, deprived of sleep, and had their hands, cuffed arms, and fingers severely twisted.[49]
Torture abroad
Khalid el-Masri
In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court deferred to state secrets privilege when they refused to hear the case of Khalid el-Masri, who was kidnapped and tortured by
the CIA under the Bush administration on December 21, 2003.The ACLU said that torture included methods of "forced anal penetration".[50][51]
Forms of torture and abuse
Certain practices of the United States military, civilian agencies such as the CIA, and private contractors have been condemned both domestically and
internationally as torture. A fierce debate regarding non-standard interrogation techniques exists within the U.S. civilian and military intelligence community,
with no general consensus as to what practices under what conditions are acceptable.
These practices have resulted in a number of deaths. According to Human Rights First, at least as many as 8 detainees have been tortured to death in U.S.
custody in Iraq and Afghanistan.[52] The aversion of some military personnel forced to administer torture has been so strong, that one soldier, Alyssa Peterson,
is believed to have committed suicide to avoid further participation.
Application of Fifth Amendment to overseas torture
In 1999, a U.S. court found that the Fifth Amendment does not apply in the case of overseas torture of aliens. Jennifer Harbury, a U.S. citizen whose husband
Efran Bmaca Velsquez had been tortured and murdered by CIA officials in Guatemala, complained that these actions violated her husband's Fifth
Amendment right not to be deprived of life or liberty without due process of law. On December 12, 2000, the Court of Appeals for the District Court of
Columbia rejected this claim, citing a lack of jurisdiction, since the events were planned and controlled in the United States, but the actual torture and murder
occurred in Guatemala, a location where the U.S. did not exercise "de facto political control".[53]
Torture, interrogation and prisons in the War on Terror
"Stress and duress"
In 2003 and 2004 there was substantial controversy over the "stress and duress" methods that were used in the U.S.'s War on Terrorism, that had been
sanctioned by the U.S. Executive branch of government at Cabinet level.[54] Similar methods in 1978 were ruled by ECHR to be inhuman and degrading
treatment, but not torture, when used by the United Kingdom in the early 1970s in Northern Ireland. CIA agents have anonymously confirmed to the
Washington Post in a December 26, 2002 report that the CIA routinely uses so-called "stress and duress" interrogation techniques, which human rights
organizations claim are acts of torture, in the U.S.-led War on Terrorism. These sources state that CIA and military personnel beat up uncooperative suspects,
confine them in cramped quarters, duct tape them to stretchers, and use other restraints that maintain the subject in an awkward and painful position for long
periods of time.[55] The phrase 'torture light' has been reported in the media and has been taken to mean acts that would not be legally defined as torture.
Some techniques within the "stress and duress" category, such as water boarding, have long been considered as torture, by both the United States government
and human rights groups.[56] In its annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, the U.S. State Department has described the following practices as
torture:
stripping and blindfolding of prisoners (Egypt)

subjecting prisoners to prolonged sun exposure in high temperatures and tying of hands and feet for extended periods (Eritrea)
sleep deprivation and "suspension for long periods in contorted positions" (Iran)
sleep deprivation and solitary confinement (Jordan)
prolonged standing and isolation (Turkey)[57]
Legal analyses
In June 2004, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, and the New York Times obtained copies of legal analyses prepared for the CIA and the Justice
Department in 2002. These documents developed a legal basis for the use of torture by U.S. interrogators if acting under the directive of the President of the
United States. The legal definition of torture by the Justice Department tightly narrowed to define as torture only actions which "must be equivalent in intensity
to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death," and argued that actions that inflict any
lesser pain, including moderate or fleeting pain, do not necessarily constitute torture.
It is the position of the United States government that the legal memoranda constituted only permissible legal research, and did not signify the intent of the
United States to use torture, which it opposes. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has complained about this prominent newspaper coverage and its
FEDERAL TORTURE
Page 7
6 of 16
6 of 14 2/4/2017 1:33 AM
implications.[54]
However, many influential U.S. thinkers also believe that Rumsfeld himself is a major part of the problem, quote the New York Times
columnist Bob Herbert:
... there is also the grotesque and deeply shameful issue that will always be a part of Mr. Rumsfeld's legacythe manner in which American troops
have treated prisoners under their control in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantnamo Bay, Cuba. There is no longer any doubt that large numbers of
troops responsible for guarding and interrogating detainees somehow loosed their moorings to humanity, and began behaving as sadists, perverts
and criminals.
Bob Herbert, [58]
The Bush administration told the CIA in 2002 that its interrogators working abroad would not violate U.S. prohibitions against torture unless they "have the
specific intent to inflict severe pain or suffering," according to a previously secret Justice Department memo released on 24 July 2008. The interrogator's "good
faith" and "honest belief" that the interrogation will not cause such suffering protects the interrogator, the memo adds. "Because specific intent is an element of
the offense, the absence of specific intent negates the charge of torture," Jay Bybee, then the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, wrote
in the memo. The 18-page memo is heavily redacted, with 10 its 18 pages completely blacked out and only a few paragraphs legible on the others.
Another memo released on the same day advises that "the waterboard" does "not violate the Torture Statute." It also cites a number of warnings against torture,
including statements by President Bush[59] and a then-new Supreme Court ruling "...which raises possible concerns about future U.S. judicial review of the
[interrogation] Program."
A third memo instructs interrogators to keep records of sessions that use "enhanced interrogation techniques." The memo is signed by then-CIA director George
Tenet and dated January 28, 2003.
The memos were made public by the American Civil Liberties Union, which obtained the three CIA-related documents under Freedom of Information Act
requests.[60]
Authorization and methods of torture and abuse
The Post article continues that sensory deprivation, through the use of hoods and spraypainted goggles, sleep deprivation, and selective use of painkillers for at
least one captive who was shot in the groin during his apprehension are also used. The agents also indicate in the report that the CIA as a matter of course hands
suspects over to foreign intelligence services with far fewer qualms about torture for more intensive interrogation.[55] (The act of handing a suspect to another
organization or country, where it is foreseeable that torture would occur, is a violation of the Convention against torture; see torture by proxy.) The Post reported
that one U.S. official said, "If you don't violate someone's human rights some of the time, you probably aren't doing your job."[55]
Based on the Justice Department analyses, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld later approved in 2003 the use of 24 classified interrogation techniques for use
on detainees at Guantanamo Bay, which after use on one prisoner were withdrawn. In court filings made public in January 2007, FBI agents reported that
detainees at Guantanamo Bay were: chained in a fetal position to the floor for at least 18 hours, urinating and defecating on themselves; subjected to extremes
of temperature; gagged with duct tape; held in stress positions while shackled; and subjected to loud music and flashing lights.[61][62] Senior administration
officials have repeatedly denied that torture is being conducted in the detention camps at Guantanamo Bay. However, the Bush administration explicitly
endorsed the use of interrogation techniques such as waterboarding in memos to the CIA,[63] and one Pentagon official has publicly admitted that torture was
conducted at Guantanamo Bay.[64]
Manfred Nowak, United Nations Special Rapporteur on torture, said that numerous cases of torture ordered by U.S. officials and perpetrated by U.S. authorities
are well documented.
"We possess all the evidence which proves that the torture methods used in interrogation by the U.S. government were explicitly ordered by former
U.S. defence minister Donald Rumsfeld...Obviously, these orders were given with the highest U.S. authorities' knowledge." [65]
Allegations emerged that in the Coalition occupation of Iraq after the second Gulf war, there was extensive use of torture techniques, allegedly supported by
American military intelligence agents, in Iraqi jails such as Abu Ghraib and others. In 2004 photos showing humiliation and abuse of prisoners leaked from Abu
Ghraib prison, causing a political and media scandal in the U.S. and the whole world.
Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State ultimately told the CIA the harsher interrogation tactics were acceptable,[66][67] In 2009 Rice stated, "We never tortured
anyone." [68]
On February 14, 2010, in an appearance on ABC's This Week, Vice-President Dick Cheney reiterated his support of waterboarding and enhanced interrogation
techniques for captured terrorist suspects, saying, "I was and remain a strong proponent of our enhanced interrogation program."[69]
Pressed by the BBC in 2010 on his personal view of waterboarding, Presidential Advisor Karl Rove said: Im proud that we kept the world safer than it was,
by the use of these techniques. Theyre appropriate, theyre in conformity with our international requirements and with U.S. law. [70]
Secret detention facilities
Both United States citizens and foreign nationals are occasionally captured outside of the United States and transferred to secret U.S. administered detention
facilities, sometimes being held incommunicado for periods of months or years. Overseas detention facilities are known to be or to have been maintained at
least in Thailand, the Philippines, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Jordan, Egypt, Iraq, Kuwait, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Cyprus, Cuba,
FEDERAL TORTURE
Page 8
7 of 16
7 of 14 2/4/2017 1:33 AM
Diego Garcia, and unspecified South Pacific island nation(s). In addition, individuals are suspected to be or to have been held in temporary or permanent U.S.
controlled facilities in Indonesia, El Salvador, Nigeria, Equatorial Guinea, Libya, Israel, Denmark, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, Hungary, Germany, and
Scotland. There are also allegations that persons categorized as prisoners of war have been tortured, abused or humiliated; or otherwise have had their rights
afforded by the Geneva Convention violated.
Torture and extraordinary rendition
Extraordinary Rendition is the apprehension and extrajudicial transfer of a person from one country to another.[71]
The term "torture by proxy" is used by some critics to describe situations in which the CIA[72][73][74][75] and other U.S. agencies have transferred suspected
terrorists to countries known to employ torture, whether they meant to enable torture or not. It has been claimed, though, that torture has been employed with
the knowledge or acquiescence of U.S. agencies (a transfer of anyone to anywhere for the purpose of torture is a violation of U.S. law), although Condoleezza
Rice (then the United States Secretary of State) stated that:[76]
the United States has not transported anyone, and will not transport anyone, to a country when we believe he will be tortured. Where appropriate,
the United States seeks assurances that transferred persons will not be tortured."
Whilst the Obama administration has tried to distance itself from some of the harshest counterterrorism techniques, it has also said that at least some forms of
renditions will continue.[77] Currently the administration continues to allow rendition only "to a country with jurisdiction over that individual (for prosecution of
that individual)" when there is a diplomatic assurance "that they will not be treated inhumanely."[78][79]
The U.S. program has also prompted several official investigations in Europe into alleged secret detentions and unlawful inter-state transfers involving Council
of Europe member states. A June 2006 report from the Council of Europe estimated 100 people had been kidnapped by the CIA on EU territory (with the
cooperation of Council of Europe members), and rendered to other countries, often after having transited through secret detention centres ("black sites") used by
the CIA, some located in Europe. According to the separate European Parliament report of February 2007, the CIA has conducted 1,245 flights, many of them
to destinations where suspects could face torture, in violation of Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture.[80]
Following the 11 September 2001 attacks the United States, in particular the CIA, has been accused of rendering hundreds of people suspected by the
government of being terroristsor of aiding and abetting terrorist organizationsto third-party states such as Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, and Uzbekistan. Such
"ghost detainees" are kept outside judicial oversight, often without ever entering U.S. territory, and may or may not ultimately be devolved to the custody of the
United States.[81][82]
Protests
On April 30, 2009, 62 members of Witness Against Torture, led by Carmen Trotta[83] were arrested at the gates of the White House demanding that the Obama
administration support a criminal inquiry into torture under the Bush administration and release innocent detainees still held at Guantanamo. The protesters
wearing orange jumpsuits and black hoods, were arrested, and charged with "failure to obey a lawful order" when they refused to leave the White House
sidewalk.[84][85]
Protests have been held regarding the issue of torture and its legality as lately as 2015.[86]
United Nations Convention Against Torture

History of U.S. Accession
The United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment was adopted on 10 December 1984 at the
thirty-ninth session of the General Assembly of the United Nations.[87][nb 2] It was registered, and came into force, on 27 June 1987 in accordance with Article
27(1) of the Convention.[88]
The United States signed the Convention in the spring of the following year, officially declaring at the time of its signature on 18 April 1988[88] that
The Government of the United States of America reserves the right to communicate, upon ratification, such reservations, interpretive
understandings, or declarations as are deemed necessary.
Thereafter, the United States formally notified the United Nations and its member states, a few months prior to its ratification, that [89]
...nothing in this Convention requires or authorizes legislation, or other action, by the United States of America prohibited by the Constitution of
the United States as interpreted by the United States.
Ratification
The U.S. ratification itself, on 21 October 1994, came some six years after the spring 1988 signature and was subject to numerous (A) reservations, (B)
understandings and (C) declarations. These can be read verbatim at the UN treaty website[88] and are parsed here as follows:
FEDERAL TORTURE
Page 9
8 of 16
8 of 14 2/4/2017 1:33 AM
A. Reservations: The U.S. made two reservations in connection with its ratification.
(1) The U.S. would only be bound to prevent the "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment" that are addressed by Article 16 of the
Convention[87][nb 3] to the extent the term "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment" was synonymous with the "cruel, unusual and
inhumane treatment or punishment prohibited by the Fifth, Eighth, and/or Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States".[90]
(2) Pursuant to treaty option, the U.S. is not bound to resolve questions by international arbitration, but it "reserves the right specifically to agree to follow
this or any other procedure for arbitration in a particular case."[91]
B. Understandings: The U.S. announced certain interpretive understandings, "which shall apply to the obligations of the United States under this
Convention:"
(1) Regarding the definition of certain terms in the Convention,

(a) "Torture"[nb 4] must be specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain. Furthermore, "mental pain" refers to prolonged mental
harm resulting from either
(1) the intentional infliction of severe physical pain;
(2) the administration of mind altering drugs;
(3) the use of other procedures that are also "calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality;"
(4) the threat of imminent death; or
(5) the threat that another person (e.g. a spouse or relative) will imminently be subjected to the foregoing.
(b) "Torture" must be an action against a victim in the torturer's custody.
(c) "Sanction"[nb 5] includes judicially imposed sanctions and other enforcement actions authorized by United States law or by judicial
interpretation of such law.
(d) "Acquiescence"[nb 6] requires that the public official, prior to the activity constituting torture, be aware that such activity is imminent, thereafter
violating his or her duty to prevent such activity.
(e) A non-compliance with applicable legal procedural standards[nb 7] does not per se constitute torture.
(2) Article 3 forbids deporting a person "where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture." The
U.S., attempting to avoid the difficulty of interpreting "substantial grounds for belief," interprets the phrase to mean "if it is more likely than not that he
would be tortured." This is essentially the preponderance of evidence test.
(3) Article 14 requires a State Party to provide, in its domestic legal system, a private right of action for damages to victims of torture. The U.S.
understands this to apply only for torture committed within territory under the jurisdiction of that State Party.
(4) The U.S. does not consider this Convention to restrict or prohibit the United States from applying the death penalty consistent with the Constitution of
the United States.
(5) The Convention will only be implemented by the United States "to the extent that it exercises legislative and judicial jurisdiction over the matters
covered by the Convention." In other words, the Convention per se is not U.S. law. By itself, it has no legal effect within the U.S. or upon its
representatives. Rather, the Convention imposes an obligation[nb 8] on the U.S. to enact and implement such domestic laws as will cause it to come into
conformity with the requirements of the Convention. This understanding is echoed in the declaration below.
C. Declarations: The U.S. declared that the provisions of Articles 1 through 16 the Convention are not self-executing.
Evidence of violations
By transferring military detainees to Iraqi control, the U.S. appears knowingly to have violated the Convention Against Torture. The Convention proscribes
signatory states from transferring a detainee to other countries "where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected
to torture." The U.S. had received reports of more than a thousand allegations, many of them substantiated by medical evidence, of torture in Iraqi jails. Yet U.S.
authorities transferred thousands of prisoners to Iraqi custody, including almost 2,000 who were transferred to the Iraqi government as recently as July 2010.[92]
U.S. case law on the convention

Burden of proof
In the U.S., an alien seeking protection against deportation under Article 3 of the Convention[nb 9] must establish that it is more likely than not that he will be
tortured in the country of removal.[nb 10][93] Thus, the alien seeking to stop his deportation bears the burden of proof (or risk of non-persuasion) to show that
torture is "more likely than not" to occur in the destination country.
In re M-B-A
In re M-B-A, a 2002 decision by the BIA,[94] concerned a 40-year-old Nigerian woman who was facing a deportation order due to a drug conviction in the US.
She claimed that if returned to Nigeria, she would be imprisoned and tortured as a result of her U.S. conviction.
In her December 1999 hearing before the immigration judge, she presented evidence of Nigeria's Decree No. 33, which authorized imprisonment in her
FEDERAL TORTURE
Page
Page10
9 of
of14
9 of 14 2/4/2017 1:33 AM
situation. When asked how she knew she would be tortured, she said that some years ago, she had spoken with a Nigerian friend,[nb 11] who had been convicted
of a U.S. drug offense and then returned to Nigeria in 1995. The friend had told her that her family had to bring money to the jail for protection, that she slept on
the floor and that "you probably get raped" by the guards because they have authority to do "whatever they can do." The friend remained in jail for 2 months
until the family paid a bribe. M-B-A did not know if the friend had seen a judge before being incarcerated, or if the friend had been raped in the prison.
M-B-A also presented evidence that she had a chronic ulcer, asthma and suffered from depression; that she was on medication but had no one to help her with
medicine if she ended up in jail; that her father was deceased and her mother lived in the UK and that she had no relations to help her in Nigeria, aside from an
uncle who had sexually abused her as a child. She claimed she would be beaten and raped in prison by the guards and that most women suffered this treatment,
and that her ex-fiance (who lived in Nigeria) would bribe prison guards to beat her.
The full Board of Appeals[nb 12] considered the question of whether M-B-A had carried her burden of proof in showing that it was more likely than not that she
would be tortured by a public official upon her return to Nigeria.
In a close 7-6 decision, the Board found that M-B-A had not demonstrated that it was more likely than not that she would be imprisoned in Nigeria on the basis
of Decree 33. She did not present any evidence on the question of the extent to which the Decree was enforced, or against whom it was enforced. Her own
evidence about enforcement was either (a) her own speculation or (b) based on the conversation with her friend's experience during a different Nigerian
regime.[nb 13] The Board stated
she has [not] met her burden of [establishing] that it is more likely than not that her return to Nigeria would result in her detention or imprisonment.
. . . [She] must provide some current evidence, or at least more meaningful historical evidence, regarding . . . enforcement of Decree 33 on
individuals similarly situation to herself. . . . [Her] case is based on a chain of assumptions and a fear of what might happen, rather than . . .
demonstrating that it is more likely than not that she will be subjected to torture. . . .
Accordingly, the BIA held that M-B-A should be deported.
There were two separate dissenting opinions,[nb 14] both of which agreed with the enunciated standard of proof to be used ("more likely than not"), but
disagreed over the question of whether the burden had been met by M-B-A. Judge Schmidt's dissent cited the U.S. State Department's report on Nigeria's prison
system, reported that one area of abuse in Nigerian prison was the intentional withholding of medical aid or medication. He found on the basis of this report that
such withholding (for purposes of e.g. gaining bribes or inflicting punishment) was common in Nigeria and that death from such actions was common. He did
not, however, address the majority's assertion that M-B-A had failed to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that she would be imprisoned in the first
place under Decree No. 33, apparently taking this for granted.[nb 15]
Defining "torture"
"Torture" within the meaning of the Convention (and 8 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 208.18)[93] is an extreme form of cruel and inhuman treatment and
does not extend to lesser forms of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment.[93][95][nb 16]
For an act to constitute torture it must satisfy each of the following five elements in the definition of torture:[95]
the act must cause severe physical or mental pain or suffering

the act must be intentionally inflicted
the act must be inflicted for a proscribed purpose
the act must be inflicted by (or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of) a public official who has custody of the victim
the act cannot arise from lawful sanctions
Matter of J-E
Thus, in the U.S. immigration case of Matter of J-E-, 23 I&N December 291 (BIA 2002)(ID 3466), the indefinite detention of criminal deportees by Haitian
authorities did not constitute "torture" where there was no evidence that the authorities intentionally and deliberately detained deportees in order to inflict
torture. Likewise, substandard prison conditions in Haiti did not constitute "torture" where there is no evidence that the authorities intentionally created and
maintained such conditions in order to inflict torture.[95]
J-E was a Haitian who had entered the U.S. illegally and who was later convicted of selling cocaine. The Government sought to deport him, but J-E claimed that
he would be imprisoned and tortured if he were returned to Haiti. Therefore, he argued, Article 3 of the Convention prevented his being deported. The Board set
out the five-part test for torture and noted that
While the Convention Against Torture makes a clear distinction between torturous and non torturous acts, actually differentiating between acts of
torture and other bad acts is not so obvious. Although not binding on the United States, the opinions of other governmental bodies adjudicating
torture claims can be instructive.
The Board thereupon considered Ireland v. United Kingdom, 2 Eur. Ct. H.R. 25 (1978), where the European Court held that suspected terrorists who were
subjected to wall standing, hooding, a constant loud and hissing noise and who were deprived of sleep, food and drink by the British Army were subjected to
"inhuman and degrading treatment" but not to "torture." It was admitted by all parties that J-E would be indefinitely detained upon return to Haiti. Deportees
were held by police in holding cells for weeks before release. However, the State Department report (relied upon by all parties) confirmed that the Haitian
government used this policy as a warning and a deterrent, to try to prevent deportees from committing crimes in Haiti.
Thus, Haiti's detention policy in itself appears to be a lawful enforcement sanction ... to protect the populace from criminal acts by Haitians who are
FEDERAL TORTURE
Page 11
10 of 16
10 of 14 2/4/2017 1:33 AM
forced to return to the country after having been convicted of crimes abroad. ... this policy is a lawful sanction and, therefore, does not constitute
torture.... [Also] there is no evidence that Haitian authorities are detaining criminal deportees with the specific intent to inflict severe physical or
mental pain or suffering. Nor is there evidence that the procedure is inflicted on criminal deportees for a proscribed purpose, such as obtaining
information or a confession.... Haiti's detention practice alone does not constitute torture within the meaning of the regulations.
J-E contended that in any case, the combination of indefinite detention with the admittedly substandard conditions of Haitian prison constitute torture. However,
the Board noted that the Convention required that "torture" required a "specific intent" by the accused country in order for torture to result:
Although Haitian authorities are intentionally detaining criminal deportees knowing that the detention facilities are substandard, there is no
evidence that they are intentionally and deliberately creating and maintaining such prison conditions in order to inflict torture. ... the Haitian prison
conditions are the result of budgetary and management problems as well as the country's severe economic difficulties.... there is no effective
delivery system [for food]... we cannot find that these inexcusable prison conditions constitute torture within the meaning of the regulatory
definition.
Finally, J-E maintained that mistreatment was common in Haitian prison and that he would be subjected to such mistreatment, and that constituted torture. The
Board found that there was, in Haiti,
Beating with fists, sticks and belts ... by far the most common form of abuse. However [there are] other forms of mistreatment, such as burning
with cigarettes, choking, hooding and ... severe boxing of the ears, which can result in eardrum damage.... there were also isolated allegations of
electric shock...[and] withholding medical treatment.
The Board considered all the evidence submitted and concluded that it showed that isolated incidents of torture did occur in Haitian detention facilities.
However, this evidence was not sufficient to demonstrate that it was more likely than not that J-E would be subjected to torture upon his detention. There was no
evidence that the torture was persistent or widespread; or that the Haitian government used torture as a policy; or that there was no meaningful international
oversight.[nb 17]
The Board accordingly heldin yet another 7-6 opinion with substantial dissenting opinionsthat J-E had failed to carry his burden of showing that the
admitted mistreatment was so pervasive that it therefore was more likely than not that he would be tortured in a Haitian jail, as opposed to being subjected to
cruel and inhuman acts that, while despicable, were less than torture within the meaning of the applicable law. Most of the actions reported against Haiti, the
Board decided, were sanctioned under Article 16 the Convention as acts that were "cruel and inhuman" and that State Parties were obliged to correct, but
nevertheless did not constitute "torture" within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention.
J-E's appeal to the BIA was therefore dismissed and the deportation order remained in effect.
See also
Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse
At the Center of the Storm book by former CIA head George Tenet
Human Rights Record of the United States
International humanitarian law
Lexical definition
Precising definition
Universal jurisdiction
Use of torture since 1948
Water cure (torture)#Philippine-American War
Other human rights issues in the United States
Tramp chair, 19th-century torture device used by American police

United States war crimes
United States and state terrorism
United States and state-sponsored terrorism
Unethical human experimentation in the United States
Notes
Footnotes
1. See article on precising definition. 4. The term "torture" is legally defined in Article 1(1) of the Convention, as
2. The United States was one of the primary sponsors of a Convention to prohibit follows:
torture and to protect human rights.Report (http://www.state.gov/www/global
/human_rights/torture_intro.html); See In Matter of J-E, discussed herein.
3. These Article 16 acts are, by definition, not torture, but rather acts which For the purpose of this Convention, the term "torture" means any
evidence cruelty or inhumanity but which nevertheless do not rise to the level of act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental,
"torture" under the Convention. is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining
from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing
him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected
of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third
FEDERAL TORTURE
Page 12
11 of 16
11 of 14 2/4/2017 1:33 AM
person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, 10. See Understanding number 2 attached to the U.S. ratification of the Convention,
when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of establishing the preponderance of evidence rule for the US.
or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other 11. She suggested that she had spoken to this person by telephone sometime in
person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or 1995, more than four years before she was giving her testimony.
suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful 12. The Board consists of up to fifteen immigration law specialists, who sit as
sanctions. immigration appellate administrative law judges. The Board is a part of the
executive branch of the U.S. Government, rather than the judicial branch; it is
not an "Article III" court under the U.S. Constitution, but rather a type of
However, the U.S. has declared that the Convention is not self-executing and administrative court within the executive branch. Its decisions are subject to
therefore the Convention's definition does not directly apply in U.S. law. The appeal to a U.S. Court of Appeals.
U.S. has implemented the Convention definition through its Code of Federal 13. In May 1999 the military regime in Nigeria was replaced with a civilian regime
Regulations. under President Obasanjo. Note 2 of decision.
5. The term "sanction" is used in Article 1. 14. A total of six judges dissented, four of them joining in one of the dissenting
6. The term "acquiescence" is used in Article 1. opinions.
7. For instance, a failure to promptly inform a suspect that he has a right to see a 15. The majority decision does not address the question of the likelihood of torture
lawyer, free of charge if he is indigent. within prison; instead, it finds that M-B-A did not show, by the required
8. This "obligation" might itself only be enforceable in the court of world opinion evidence standard, that she would be imprisoned at all, which rendered the
or through United Nations resolution against the US. question of treatment within prison as moot.
9. Article 3 provides that 16. This does not imply that such "lesser" forms can be committed by governments
with impunity. Article 16 the Convention, for example, imposes on each State
1. No State Party shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite a Party an obligation to try to prevent such "lesser" forms of cruel treatment, even
person to another State where there are substantial grounds for though they do not rise to the level of torture. But only such severe actions that
believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture. do rise to the level of "torture" are grounds for preventing deportation under the
terms of Article 3 of the Convention.
2. For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, 17. The Board noted that the Haitian government cooperated with the Red Cross in
the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant delivering aid and allowed a Miami Herald reporter access to the prisons (part of
considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the the newspaper story was used by J-E as his evidence in the hearing).
State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass Furthermore, the U.S. had urged the Haitian government to discontinue the
violations of human rights. indefinite detention practice and the President of Haiti had visited jails and had
pardoned several women there, due to the awful conditions.
As noted, the U.S. opted to interpret the vague language of "substantial grounds"
in article 3(1) as synonymous with the preponderance of evidence standard
found in the common law; the "preponderance" standard has been subject of
ample decided cases in the US, creating plenty of judicial precedent.
References
1. "UN calls for Guantnamo Bay to close". The Guardian. 16 February 2006. 10. Military Commissions Act of 2006
Retrieved 22 May 2012. Why The Military Commissions Act is No Moderate Compromise
2. Norton-Taylor, Richard; Goldenberg, Suzanne (17 February 2006). "Judge's (http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dorf/20061011.html) By Michael C. Dorf,
anger at US torture". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 January 2011. FindLaw, October 11, 2006
3. The Constitution Project (2013), The Report of the Constitution Project's Task The CIA, the MCA, and Detainee Abuse (http://writ.lp.findlaw.com
Force on Detainee Treatment (http://detaineetaskforce.org/). Retrieved 25 April /mariner/20061108.html) By Joanne Mariner, FindLaw, November 8,
2013. 2006
4. In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. 436, 447 (1890) ("Punishments are cruel when they Europe's Investigations of the CIA's Crimes (http://writ.news.findlaw.com
involve torture or a lingering death."). /mariner/20070220.html) By Joanne Mariner, FindLaw, February 20,
5. Amnesty International, Rubber stamping violations in the "war on terror": 2007
Congress fails human rights (http://web.amnesty.org/library/index Nat Hentoff (December 8, 2006). "Bush's War Crimes Cover-up". Village
/ENGAMR511552006), 27 September 2006. Voice. Archived from the original on 2009-08-13. Retrieved 2007-04-02.
6. Martin Scheinin, U.N. Expert on Human Rights and Counterterrorism The John McCain Charade (http://www.commondreams.org/views06
Concerned that Military Commissions Act is Now Law in United States /1001-23.htm) by Robert Kuttner, the Boston Globe, October 1, 2006
(http://www.unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/view01 Republican Torture Laws Will Live in History (http://www.alternet.org
/13A2242628618D12C12572140030A8D9?opendocument), 27 October 2006, /rights/42414/) By Larisa Alexandrovna, AlterNet, October 2, 2006.
U.N. Press Release 11. FM 2-22.3. Human Intelligence Collector Operations (http://www.fas.org
7. Jeremy Waldron, The Rule against Torture as a Legal Archetype /irp/doddir/army/fm2-22-3.pdf), 6 September 2006, p. 5-20.
(http://www.vanderbilt.edu/alumni/email/InBrief/2006Spring 12. FM 2-22.3. Human Intelligence Collector Operations (http://www.fas.org
/charney_lecture_06.html), Charney Lecture, 2006 /irp/doddir/army/fm2-22-3.pdf), 6 September 2006, p. 5-21.
8. No longer punishable under U.S. law 13. Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture (http://www.oas.org
Thoughts on the "Bringing Terrorists to Justice Act of 2006" /juridico/English/Treaties/a-51.html)
(http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20060922.html) John Dean, FindLaw, 14. Dahleen Glanton, "Controversial exhibit on lynching opens in Atlanta" May 5,
September 22, 2006 2002, Chicago Tribune. Reproduced online (http://web.archive.org
The Military Commissions Act of 2006: A Short Primer - Part Two of a /web/20050311100917/http://www.deltasigmatheta.com/archiv13.htm) on the
Two-Part Series (http://writ.news.findlaw.com/mariner/20061025.html) site of deltasigmatheta.com, archived on the Internet Archive March 11, 2005.
By Joanne Mariner, FindLaw, October 25, 2006 15. Robin D.G. Kelley, "'Slangin' Rocks ... Palestinian Style,'" chapter 1 of Police
Why The Military Commissions Act is No Moderate Compromise Brutality, Jill Nelson (ed.), 2000.
(http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dorf/20061011.html) By Michael C. Dorf, 16. G. Daniel Lassiter (2004). Interrogations, Confessions, and Entrapment.
FindLaw, October 11, 2006 Springer Science+Business Media. ISBN 0-306-48470-6.
9. Pushing Back on Detainee Act (http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061016/ratner) 17. "From coercion to deception: the changing nature of police interrogation in
by Michael Ratner is president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, The America". Crime, Law and Social Change. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 18.
Nation, October 4, 2006 1992.
18. Strickler, Laura (December 9, 2014). "Secret WWII camp interrogators say
torture wasn't needed". CBS News. Retrieved 2016-10-13.
19. Counterinsurgency Lessons from Vietnam for the Future (http://usacac.army.mil
/CAC/milreview/English/MarApr06/Andrade-Willbanks.pdf), (PDF), Military
Review, MarchApril 2006
FEDERAL TORTURE
Page 13
12 of 16
12 of 14 2/4/2017 1:33 AM
20. J. Patrice McSherry. Predatory States: Operation Condor and Covert War in 47. Human Rights Watch, World Report, 1993
Latin America (https://rowman.com/ISBN/9780742536876). Rowman & 48. Human Rights Watch, Locked Away: Immigration Detainees in Jails in the
Littlefield Publishers, 2005. p. 36 (https://books.google.com United States, September 1998. Dan Frosch, "Detention Center Blues," In These
/books?id=tSDg6xa4z2YC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA36#v=onepage&q&f=false). ISBN Times, June 14, 2004.
0742536874 49. U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General, The September 11
21. Greg Grandin (2011). The Last Colonial Massacre: Latin America in the Cold Detainees: A Review of the Treatment of Aliens Held on Immigration Charges in
War (http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago Connection with the Investigation of the September 11 Attacks, June 2003.
/L/bo11643711.html). University of Chicago Press. p. 75 Supplemental Report on September 11 Detainees Allegations of Abuse at the
(https://books.google.com/books?id=6FivSpNY2fkC&lpg=PP1& Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York, December 2003.
pg=PA75#v=onepage&q&f=false). ISBN 9780226306902 50. ACLU petition, 2006 (https://www.aclu.org/files/pdfs/safefree
22. Walter L. Hixson (2009). The Myth of American Diplomacy: National Identity /elmasri_iachr_20080409.pdf). (PDF) . Retrieved on 2012-05-28.
and U.S. Foreign Policy (http://yalepress.yale.edu 51. Burke Hansen. Supreme Court denies cert in el-Masri rendition case
/book.asp?isbn=9780300119121). Yale University Press. p. 223 (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/09/el_masri_state_secrets/). The Register
(https://books.google.com/books?id=DNId6HxkzQwC&lpg=PP1& (2007-10-09)
pg=PA223#v=onepage&q&f=false). ISBN 0300151314 52. Human Rights First Releases First Comprehensive Report on Detainee Deaths in
23. "Graduates of the School of the Americas include military officers and leaders U.S. Custody (http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/media/2006_alerts
implicated in torture and mass murder in Guatemala, El Salvador, Chile, /etn_0222_dic.htm), 2006-02-22, Human Rights First, Press Release
Argentina and Haiti, among other Latin American countries." Miles Schuman, 53. "Application of Fifth Amendment to Overseas Torture of Alien". The American
"Abu Ghraib: the rule, not the exception (http://soaw.org Journal of International Law. 95 (3). July 2001.
/newswire_detail.php?id=429)," Globe and Mail (Toronto), May 14, 2004. 54. Torture Policy (cont'd) (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles
24. Miles Schuman, "Abu Ghraib: the rule, not the exception (http://soaw.org /A56753-2004Jun20.html) Editorial in the Washington Post 21 June 2004
/newswire_detail.php?id=429)," Globe and Mail (Toronto), May 14, 2004. 55. Dana Priest and Barton Gellman, "U.S. Decries Abuse but Defends
25. Harbury, Jennifer (2005), Truth, Torture, and the American Way: The History Interrogations (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-
and Consequences of U.S. Involvement in Torture (https://books.google.com dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A37943-2002Dec25&
/books?id=ZIcZjlj1hLEC& notFound=true)" Washington Post, December 26, 2002; Page A01
dq=%22Truth,+Torture,+and+the+American+Way%22&printsec=frontcover& 56. "The United States has long considered waterboarding to be torture and a war
source=bn&hl=en&ei=vOg5SqaRE5arjAeEvvGhDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result& crime." Human Rights Watch, "U.S.: Vice President Endorses Torture
ct=result&resnum=6), Beacon Press ISBN 978-0-8070-0307-7 (http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/10/26/usdom14465.htm)," October 26, 2006.
26. Adam Taylor (10 December 2014). Brazils torture report brings a president to 57. Human Rights Watch, "Descriptions of Techniques Allegedly Authorized by the
tears (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/12/10 CIA (http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/11/21/usdom12071.htm)," November
/brazils-torture-report-brings-a-president-to-tears/). The Washington Post. 2005.
Retrieved 12 December 2014. 58. Much of what has happened to the military on Donald Rumsfeld's watch has
27. Amnesty International,Report on Torture [US edition, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, been catastrophic (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/23/opinion
1975], and specific AI country reports. /23herbert.html?ex=1270785600&en=37bef79604f97228&ei=5090&
28. James Hodge and Linda Cooper, "Roots of Abu Ghraib in CIA techniques partner=rssuserland) by Bob Herbert New York Times 23 May 2005
(http://ncronline.org/NCR_Online/archives2/2004d/110504/110504a.php)," 59. Bush, George W. (2001-11-13). "President Issues Military Order on Detention,
National Catholic Reporter, November 5, 2004. Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in the War Against Terrorism".
29. Lawg.org (http://www.lawg.org/misc/Publications-manuals.htm) White House. Retrieved 2009-04-25.
30. JPRA Operational Concerns Over Application of Various Means of Induced 60. Previously secret torture memo released (http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS
Duress (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/pdf/JPRA- /07/24/cia.torture/index.html), July 24, 2008, CNN.com
Memo_042409.pdf), (PDF), July 25, 2002, hosted by the Washington Post 61. FBI, FOIA document (http://foia.fbi.gov/guantanamo/detainees.pdf)
31. Document: Military Agency Referred to 'Torture,' Questioned Its Effectiveness 62. Mark Tran, "FBI files detail Guantnamo torture tactic
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04 (https://www.theguardian.com/guantanamo/story/0,,1981955,00.html),"
/24/AR2009042403171_pf.html), April 24, 2009, the Washington Post Guardian, January 3, 2007.
32. Safir on ABC Good Morning America, August 18, 1997; quoted in Human 63. Joby Warrick, CIA Tactics Endorsed In Secret Memos
Rights Watch, "New York (https://www.hrw.org/reports98/police/uspo99.htm)", (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10
Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States, /14/AR2008101403331_pf.html), Washington Post Staff Writer, October 15,
1998. 2008; A01
33. Susan Bandes, Tracing the Pattern of No Pattern: Stories of Police Brutality 64. "Pentagon official says 9/11 suspect was tortured". Associated Press.
(http://llr.lls.edu/volumes/v34-issue2/bandes.pdf), 34 Loyola Law Review, 2001. 2009-01-14. Retrieved 2009-01-14.
34. Paige Bierma, Torture behind bars: right here in the United States of America 65. Call to Try Bush (http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/02/02), Inter
(http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1295/is_n7_v58/ai_15533722), The Press Service, February 2, 2009
Progressive (http://progressive.org/about), July 1994. 66. As Bush Adviser, Rice Gave OK to Waterboard Fox News, April 22, 2009
35. Justin Volpe plead guilty and was sentenced to 30 years in prison. "Policeman in (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/22/timeline-released-senate-shows-
torture case changes plea to guilty (http://www.cnn.com/US/9905 condoleezza-rice-okd-waterboarding/)
/25/police.torture.02/index.html)," CNN, May 25, 1999. "Volpe receives 30-year 67. Senate Report: Rice, Cheney OK'd CIA use of waterboarding CNN, April 23,
sentence for sodomy in Louima brutality case (http://www.courttv.com/archive 2009
/national/louima/121399_volpe_sentence_ctv.html)," Court TV, December 13, 68. April 30, 2009, "Rice Defends Enhanced Interrogation" by Glenn Kessler
1999. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/Politics,)
36. Davey, Monica (2006-05-20), "Judge Rules Report on Police in Chicago Should 69. " 'This Week' Transcript: Former Vice President Dick Cheney". This Week. ABC.
Be Released", New York Times February 14, 2010. Retrieved February 27, 2010.
37. "Report of the Committee against Torture, Thirty-sixth session" (PDF). United 70. http://www.timesonline.co.uk, March 13, 2010, "Karl Rove says water torture is
Nations. May 2006. justified - and a source of pride" by Giles Whittell
38. Evan Wallach (2007-11-02). "Waterboarding Used to Be a Crime". Washington 71. Michael John Garcia, Legislative Attorney American Law Division. Renditions:
Post. Constraints Imposed by Laws on Torture (http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec
39. Eric Weiner (2007-11-03). "Waterboarding: A Tortured History". National /RL32890.pdf) 8 September 2009; link from the United States Counter-
Public Radio. Terrorism Training and Resources for Law Enforcement web site
40. Amnesty International, Rights for All (http://web.amnesty.org/library/index (http://www.counterterrorismtraining.gov/leg/index.html)
/engAMR510351998), 1 October 1998. 72. Charlie Savage (17 February 2009). "Obama's War on Terror May Resemble
41. "False Confessions". The Innocence Project. Retrieved June 6, 2012. Bush's in Some Areas". The New York Times. Archived from the original on
42. "Torture cases". Channel 4. 2016-07-23. Retrieved 2 January 2010.
43. Oshinsky, David (June 11, 2010). "Book Review - In the Place of Justice - By 73. "Background Paper on CIA's Combined Use of Interrogation Techniques
Wilbert Rideau". The New York Times. (https://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/082409/olcremand/2004olc97.pdf)".
44. "Southern Injustice". Mother Jones. Retrieved 2013-12-15. 30 December 2004. Retrieved 2 January 2010.
45. Butler, Anne, and C. Murray Henderson. Dying to Tell. Center for Louisiana 74. "New CIA Docs Detail Brutal 'Extraordinary Rendition' Process
Studies, 1992. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/28/new-cia-docs-detail-
46. Lance Tapley, Torture in Maines prison (http://www.portlandphoenix.com bruta_n_271299.html)". Huffington Post. 28 August 2009. Retrieved 2 January
/features/top/ts_multi/documents/05081722.asp), Portland Phoenix, November 2010.
1117, 2005.
FEDERAL TORTURE
Page 14
13 of 16
13 of 14 2/4/2017 1:33 AM
75. Fact sheet: Extraordinary rendition (https://www.aclu.org/safefree 84. Anti-torture activists arrested at White House (https://www.google.com
/extraordinaryrendition/22203res20051206.html), American Civil Liberties /hostednews/ap/article
Union. Retrieved 29 March 2007 (English) /ALeqM5jgOLS9bxJ4L58oWKMKWbwnxKURhwD97T0ISO0)
76. "Remarks of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice Upon Her Departure for 85. 62 Arrested at White House Protest (http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/139275
Europe, 5 Dec 2005". U.S. State Department. Retrieved 17 August 2012. /62_arrested_at_white_house_protest/)
77. "Obama preserves renditions as counter-terrorism tool 86. Vibes, John (January 20, 2015). "Nationwide Protests Against Torture Planned
(http://articles.latimes.com/2009/feb/01/nation/na-rendition1)". LA Times 1 For Jan 31 In The US #EndTorture". The Daily Liberator.
February 2009. Access 21 November 2011. 87. Official Text of Convention (http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cat.htm)
78. Erdbrink, Thomas (1 September 2011). "N.Y. billing dispute reveals details of 88. Convention Status (http://treaties.un.org/Pages
secret CIA rendition flights". The Washington Post. /ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&id=129&chapter=4&lang=en)
79. "Renditionsand Secrecy Around ThemContinue". 2011. Retrieved 89. Convention Status - footnote 12 (http://treaties.un.org/Pages
7 October 2011. Panetta's clarification of current US "Rendition policy". /ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&id=129&chapter=4&lang=en)
80. Resolution 1507 (2006). (http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/Documents 90. Yee (2004) p. 208 (https://books.google.com/books?id=gpqa9smhWqcC&
/AdoptedText/ta06/ERES1507.htm) Alleged secret detentions and unlawful pg=PA208#PPA208,M1), Footnote 18. cites Convention Against Torture, Annex
inter-state transfers of detainees involving Council of Europe member states] I,I.
81. Mayer, Jane. The New Yorker, 14 February 2005. "Outsourcing Torture: The 91. Yee (2004), p. 208, Footnote 18. cites Convention Against Torture, Annex I,I(2).
secret history of America's 'extraordinary rendition' program.". Retrieved 92. Al Jazeera, 2010 October 24, "The Secret Iraq Files: The War US Turned Blind
20 February 2007. Eye to Torture; Leaked Documents on Iraq War Contain Thousands of
82. According to former CIA case officer Bob Baer, "If you want a serious Allegations of Abuse, But a Pentagon Order Told Troops to Ignore Them,"
interrogation, you send a prisoner to Jordan. If you want them to be tortured, you http://english.aljazeera.net/secretiraqfiles/2010/10/20101022161828428516.html
send them to Syria. If you want someone to disappearnever to see them 93. CFR Provisions (http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&
againyou send them to Egypt." The CIA's Rendition Flights to Secret Prisons: tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title08/8cfr208_main_02.tpl)
The Torture-Go-Round (http://www.CounterPunch.org/rajiva12052005.html) By 94. 23 I&N December 474 (BIA 2002) (ID#3480), available at USDOJ.gov
Lila Rajiva in CounterPunch, 5 December 2005 (http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/efoia/bia/Decisions/Revdec/pdfDEC/3480.pdf)
83. Arthur Delaney (30 April 2009). "Anti-torture Protestors Arrested in Droves 95. In the Matter of J-E- (http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/nfvol23.html),
Outside the White House". Huffington Post. Retrieved 17 December 2009. volume 23, case 3466 (http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/efoia/bia/Decisions/Revdec
/pdfDEC/3466.pdf) (BIA decisions).
Yee, Sienho (2004). International crime and punishment: selected issues', University Press of America, ISBN 9780761828877
Further reading
Cecilia Menjivar, Nestor Rodriguez (eds.): When States Kill: Latin America, the U.S., and Technologies of Terror, Austin: Texas University Press, 2005
Alfred W. McCoy: A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, From the Cold War to the War on Terror, Henry Holt, 2006, ISBN 0-8050-8041-4
Kristian Williams, American methods: torture and the logic of domination, South End Press, 2006, ISBN 0-89608-753-0
US Senate Report on CIA Detention and Interrogation Program, 2014 (http://www.intelligence.senate.gov/study2014/sscistudy1.pdf)
External links
Four memos on torture (http://publicservice.evendon.com/DOJMemosM.htm), released April 16, 2009, in response to a Freedom of Information Act
lawsuit
Senate Armed Forces Committee Report on Torture (http://publicservice.evendon.com/SenateTortureReport1M.htm), released April 22, 2009
Periodic reports of the United States to the Committee Against Torture (CAT) (http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/index.htm)
Warrant to Torture?: A Critique of Dershowitz and Levinson (http://acdis.illinois.edu/publications/207/publication-
WarranttoTortureACritiqueofDershowitzandLevinson.html), ACDIS Occasional Paper by Jonathan Allen, published by the Program in Arms Control,
Disarmament, and International Security (ACDIS), University of Illinois, 2005
Convention Status (http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&id=129&chapter=4&lang=en)
Newsweek: Inspector General Report Reveals CIA Conducted Mock Executions (http://www.democracynow.org/2009/8
/24/newsweek_inspector_general_report_reveals_cia) - video report by Democracy Now!
'The Past is a Foreign Country?' Obama and the Torture Files (http://www.iss.europa.eu/nc/actualites/actualite/article/the-past-is-a-foreign-country-
obama-and-the-torture-files/) by Alexandra Barahona de Brito, Opinion, May 2009 European Union Institute for Security Studies
Human Rights First; Tortured Justice: Using Coerced Evidence to Prosecute Terrorist Suspects (2008) (http://www.humanrightsfirst.info/pdf/08307-
etn-tortured-justice-web.pdf)
Human Rights First; Leave No Marks: Enhanced Interrogation Techniques and the Risk of Criminality (http://www.humanrightsfirst.info/pdf/07801-
etn-leave-no-marks.pdf)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Torture_and_the_United_States&oldid=763176186"
Categories: Torture in the United States Crime in the United States Political history of the United States Violence in the United States
This page was last modified on 1 February 2017, at 18:58.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of
Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
FEDERAL TORTURE
Page 15
14 of 16
14 of 14 2/4/2017 1:33 AM
File & ServeXpress Basic https://secure.fileandservexpress.com/Basic/authorize.asp?dowhat=print...
! " ! # $$
% & &
! '( ( ! )* + ) )' %,-. * )./ 0. '+ + ,
"
% '
# $ # & &
! 1 2 3 . 2 ( 145 2 " 67 2 + 9! # -
$ : 7 & 2 2
)* + ) )' %,-. 8 ! " 8
'( " ) * +), -% . ! / 0/ 1 *#2 32 4567

' '
'
) !$ ! 1 2 3 . 2 ( 145 2 " 67 2
2 ; ; $ !
2 )* + ) )' %,-. 8 ! " 8
# $ 8
: 7
< ! $ 2=
& 9 :56:;:;; <5%55
CI-16-08472 INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF

Page 16 of 16 Saturday February 4, 2017
1 of 1 2/4/2017 1:41 AM
Preliminary Injunction for EMERGENCY RELIEF
!! "
# $%% & '(
)$! $ !*% $
+++ ))% % $ ) #, &
- .
/ 0 '
& ! % !,$ %
0 $ #%%$ ' * $%% $%* $&$
$ $ ! )
# 1 ! $& % 0 $)1 !$ 1# &1
2, !! )
1 * ! ,$ ' $& % $ & ' & ! )$ % $& %
& ! )$ % $& %
& ! $ * %$& ,
& $ % 30 $ ) ' & ! $ * %$& ,
! 4 5555555555555
%$ $ * ) &* 6# & $ 7 %$ 7/
4 , $ $& $ !
555555555558 8555555555555
' $ $)
(
!! " # $%% & '
)$! $ !*% $
+++ ))% % $ ) #, &

! & 9) $% &
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Page 1 of 813 September 22, 2016
Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief
%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !
((( &&" " ! & )#
* +, * *
, - * -, # ' . "
"! ! ' & #' / # ! . "! . ) 00$ 0123
2 & - * -, # ' . "

"! ! ' & #' / # ! . "! . ) 02$ 0123
2 , * * *
0 + 4
5 ) "
6 ! !# ! . / # !
7 "! . &8
3 #" ! ' 8 , * " '
9 ' 8 , * " '
:
; < + *
0 < + * - * * * * -, # '
. " "! ! ' & #' / # ! . "! . ) 02$
0123
5 00$ 0123 " ! # . - -*8 )'- )

2 2 ' 0;$ 0123 =) !# " !"
0 ' 0;$ 0123 - ! 8& "" 8 #' = # ! # !) ! .
=)
2 ' 0;$ 0123 =) !# " ! #8 & # !
! & !
6 0 # 9$ 0127 ! ! & #' ! ! . + #> ! !
7 5 #8 05$ 0123 - =) !# " !" - ! ! . + #> ! !

2 #8 05$ 0123 - =) ! #8 & # ! (! 8 #
# !) !
3 6 ' 21$ 0123 - =) # !) ! . ='#

2 ' 21$ 0123 - =) !# " !" - ! ! . + #> ! !
9 7 ! ! ! " )" ! ! ! & 8 !# "

"! !# . ! " ") # !#
: ' 07$ 0121 - , # " )! " -* ) !# !

* ! ! !#
; + & 7$ 0127 - )) * * !# )) " #

))"!# !

21 3 ) 22$ 011; - , , . ""! . ' !"" !"'

" 8. + #> !
22 9 # 22$ 0127 - !# " !" . , " !# !# & ' )

' "
2 , " !# !# & ' ) ,! ! & !# ! #" ! &
!# !
20 ' 011: - !#" ' =) 8 '" ? " 8 *! " @ @ * #8@ *

> . ! " "" & !
25 : =) ! ! ! # !) ! . ! ' & 2;$ 0123

? , * * ?
26 ; 21$ 0123 - , # &! " !# " ! + "" #> 2070

& #' !# " !" . 21$ 0123
2 *
0 , # &! " !# " A , ,
5 A *
27 * +, * * B < , * # !) . ?8! " " ( * ! ! .

* & ! ! " ) ! " "! 8 ' #
! ) ) 29$ 0123
2 2 + #>& . * & ! ! "
0 0 ! . ! " ?! -* #8 * >
$ ' 8 '" ? " 8 011:
2 * " .#
0 # !
5 ! ! ') . # C #8D
6 *8 &! ! & . C #8D 8 (!
7 ?8 ! C #8D E
3 = )" .C #8D
9 *8 " & 8! ' . *
: " ? #! # - ! # "
; " ? " 8 "( ) #8
21 ?8' C #8D 8 ## . "
22 < "" 8 ) & " . "!F! &
20 < ! # " "" & ! ' 4 ? ?$
25 < *8 " !F #8 !G .C #8
26 < *8 8 > ' 8 ! "# ) .C #8D
27 < * C >! . " 8 D
23 < # ) ! .C #8D !
29 < *8 )8 " &' . 8 ! !
2: < ) ! &C #8D #8 !G .
2; < #" ! B (8 ' # &
23 5 "" ( * ! ' . * * " 0

" 2 "' 20$ 0123
29 6 * # !) . 8 !#8 ! ' #!" "!# ! & . ' 2;$ 0127 ! &

! ' " ! 7-0 + ) # -+ ? ) ! )) . 8 '
* & ! ! " .. ! & ' ) . 8 ! '
2: ( !#" . !#8 ! ' #!" " ! * + ) # + ? )

2; 7 4 ( $ ?8! " " ( * & ! ! "

2 * # !) @*8 ! 8 ! ( ' '# )8
#! ) 8 @
0 *8 ! (B < , B )" ' ) > !
) ! '4 (
5 ?8! " " ( . 8 8 ( 8 ,!&8 '4
(
6 # ! (
01 3 "! #4! '$ ' ""!& # ..!# $ ?8! " " ( $ * &
! ! "
2 * # !) . & F' >!H ! ( ?! 8 "! #>! '
02 9 !#> + &!#8$ 8 =) #8 . ) ! "

2 # 2$ 0127 !#> + &!#8 , # 8 . #
! + "! $ '
00 : # ! ) = # ! '
2 2 # ! ) !- , &! " ! = # !
'
0 0 , . '" ! ) ! !> " & !F
">! & +!"" . :$ 011;
5 5 , - !- ">! & ) , &! " !
6 6 & . = # ! '
7 7 = # ! '
3 3 ) . = # ! ' # 21$ 0127
9 9 ! ' . " ?8! " " (! & * & ! ! "
: ; *8 8 ! , & " '
; 21 !"' ! '
21 22 *8 "!# #
22 20 , # ' I . ) ! "
20 25 ..! ! . ! . # 21$ 0127
25 26 0; , * ! # 2;:9
26 27 0: ,, , * *
27 23 J !F ..! ! . ) 23$ 0121
# !
23 29 J !" !# ! !F ! ..! ! . 0121
29 2: " ) ! " ..! ! 2;;3
2: 2; ' ..! ! . ) ! " 2;;2
05 ; 2;97 * * A * * , * . 8 2;97
! " # ! & > "
2 4 " 2) .
0 4 " 0) .
5 4 " 5) .
6 4 " 6) .
7 4 " 7) .
3 4 " 3) .
9 4 " 9) .
: 4 " :) .
; 4 " ;) .
21 4 " 21 ) .
22 4 " 22 ) .
20 4 " 20 ) .
25 4 " 25 ) .
26 4 " 26 ) .

06 21 ) " . * ! 8 & & ! ! '

# ! ) #8 29$ 0123 (! 8 ..! ! 4
) , !
2 , " + ' ) . '" ! ' "4 8"
4 J ' " ..!#
0 ..! !
5 +!"" 4 ! "! & . ( " ## @ " # ) - ?8 8 4 8" 4
# ! ! ""' @
07 * K )" & ! * !"" # $ ! "$ "'

L* * , * * ,
2 # !
0 * " .
5 + #>&
6 +! - " # & !# ? )
7 & ">! &
3 * ! ! "
9 , * * *
: 0127 ! ' . !#8 "!. ! " ! + ! & ) # +
? )
; ,

%$ $ * ) &* 6# & $ 7 %$ 7/
4 , $ $& $ !
"# "$% & ' ( ) * + , " -. / 0 ,-12$"- ' #3 "0-#

4-#+ 51$6 ))7 ** * ' + 8* ' & ( ) (
+ 98 ) -4-15-"0. 1 ) ' 1 0! : ; $ $ ) +1 1
, %$ $ * !, &$ % $ 6# & $ !1 #% ) +1 1 $& 1 $ )
!1 #% :#$ ' 1 & # * & 1 !$! 7 1 ! 7 1 ,% $ )!
, $ $ *& !$ 77$ $ ! 7, $ ! 1$ , ! ! * 1 , 7 +1$&1
1 & # * :#$ ; $ <=><? @ 1 &$!$ +1 1 )
1 $ ) ) &* $ 6# & $ $! 1 7 % 7 1 ! # $!& $ 7 1 & # A
1 7$%$ ) 7 $ * 1 ,% $ $77 ! # $& %%* $ % 1$
1 $ )
8 8 10 0 8 ' ** ) 18 <& & =&
8 & ( 8 ' 8 & 6#! ' * '( ' >* ! ' ) ! (
* ' <& & & ( ** ,& 8 ! ( ) ( 8 &
* ' ( ' ' ( ' ) ) * '8 <& & ' )) & 8
& ) & *
# ? *
555555555558 8555555555555
' $ $)
(
!! " # $%% & '
)$! $ !*% $
+++ ))% % $ ) #, &

! & 9) $% &
0 '
< B>4<C4DBBB= 77$& 7 1 $ &#$ 2 &# $ ' $ ! 1$ $ &#$

# 7 ,, %! 4 0
@ ' @ A B>4<C4DBBBEC
F 1$ $ &#$ # 7 ,, %! 0 " A@ 1 , << 0 3 #, &*

,, %B 0 " @ 7 $! $&1 %% B @ 7
$! $&1 %% AB B @@ @
> $! $& # ! $! $& 7 0 " @ @ $ $ 7 #!

,#!A ! ! @ @ FBB= $ # ! A0 " ! @ 1 , <<
,, %A A@B @ 7 $! $&1 %% A AAB @
A A A
E $! $& # $ % $! $& 7 ! <C4& 4<G=<

0
= + % 1 7 !*% $ # $&$ % #& 0 - ! FB<C4ECF

0 * 0 8 (0 8 )0 # ) 0 +
C !*% $ #, # 0 " @ 4 & ! # *

!$ !B 0 " @ 4 & ! $ * %$& , B0 "
4, B @ 4, A A 44 $&#! 7 H 1% H
G #, $ # 7 !*% $ 0 " 4# %$ $ * ) &*

6# & $ B 7 H 1% H ! <<CE FB<CB 0 " 4#
B 4# A <C4<F<D %$ $ * 6# & $ ! 7 FB<C
I & ! # * # 7 % !0 " A B B @
0+ @
D 0 3 #, &* # 7 1 ! $! $& 7 !*% $ ! <C4<B<=G
0 H
& * ( & * C & ! 8 ' < & * ! )

8 ) ,& +",+ & ' ( ! ' * !' +
A & +",+ >* C * ' C * A + 8 8 ) A
& ! # * & ' *8 ' & +",+ ! ' C* ) <
) ' ' ') ' 8 ,& +",+ & '' ' & * < !
& 8 8 > ) * ' 8)) '8 C* *8 & ' ' 8 ,&
* < ' ') 8 ' & ! & 8 8 > & +",+ & '' '
4 ( ) < C & +",+ & '< & ,& *( ' '98
(# 8 " <& & * < & * (! ,& +",+ &
* & ,+-", & ' 8 & ! ( ) *
' & < 8 ' ' ,& * ' < * '
& +",+ < /8 & -4-15-"0. 1$$4 ) & 1
4 ' 0 <& & +",+ < *8 * )8 ( ' 8 ( C ' ( & * 8 )
& & ' ) <& & < 8 )8 )) * & +",+
) 8 & 8 ' ) ' * & ' ! ') '
( ' )) & ! ' & ' ' 8 ' 8 8 '
+ & +",+ ) >* & ( ' )) 4 *

( 4 ' ! ' & 22-.3+ - 4+ . 1 0,+0- (! 1 '
(! ,& ' )) ) ' & +",+ & < : ; ( &( <
* * B # 2 8 ! ' # # 0 * ( ,& +",+ ' # #
0 * ( ' ** < ' ) *&( ' ' ! < ) < ) &
' ) ) ' ) 4 * ' 6* ! ) & *&(
& ) * & 22-.3+ - 4+ . 1 0,+0- )8 ' & &
' ' & +",+ ' (# 2 8 ! :+ &;
+ # 2 8 ! < * 3 ' * * ' ' )

* 4 ) & * * < ) ' ( *& ,& 4 & )
& ( & ' )) '# 8 ! & +",+ ( '< & *
' ' )) ! ! < & ) & ' (* ' 8)) & +",+ <
>* ' ( # 2 8 ! ' ' * ( ' *8 & ) ) ( *
' ) 6 * ' 4 ' 0 <& & < '( 8** ' ' ! ) ' ( &
8 ( ' & < ' )2 ) & ( ) ,& +",+
)) 8 & ' ' * * ' & ' & %$1# 1-
,D- "0 -,-1 5-"-1 D$ $+, ' ( ) ) "$ ,1- "$,+0- &
+",+ & 8' ( ) < ' ' * ' ( & "0 ,-1 5-"-1
D$ +, <& & 8' 4+ . #$0,$1 8 ' & 0 ( ) ,&
+",+ ) ' ! ! 5 D * & '98' '
&
FB<C 1 + ! , !& $ ,$ , $ $& $ ! 7 , $

!#77 $ )$ 1 &3 ) $ # * FD' FB<CA &1 F>' FB<CA * <B' FB<C
7$ %%* # <B' FB<C * 1 & ! )$ % $& % 1 2, !!
7 &$%$ * 1 ! , !& $ $ ) ,$ ! ? $& * & @ )#% !$! #
1 & ! & $ # 1 , !& $, $ ! 7 ! !$ #%* #)#! 7 FB<C 1
$!$ ! + #! 1 !! # 1 * 7#!$ ) 1 1
J
.
# 1 K! 77 ! $ $ $L &1 ) $ % & 7 1
$& $ !' 1 #! ! ! )* 7 %* 3$ ) M ,$%% ! ! #! ! 1
& # !# ! 77! 1 &1 ) $ % & +1$&1 % ! ! , $ ! $ )
1$)1 ! ! $ +1$&1 1 % ! $& $ , % ! #!&% % 2 ! +
%! , !& $ # , $ 1 , $ %$ 7 1 !$ 77 & 7
! $ #
+ & +",+ ** * ** ' ) 8 ( # ( 2 ) )

( * ' ' 6 * ' 4 ' 0 + 8' ' & ** '
** ! * < & 8 ) ' ) ' ' ' & * '
8)) ) * & ' C ,& +",+ 7 < ! < ' ( & $)) )
3 ' 8 8 ) & 8 ( ' % 1#-# )
' ' ' & +",+ ' ' ) # ) & C ) E @ <
< ' ' ) ! ) C * ) A ' ) ' < ,& +",+
' ' 0D1$"+0 ' 8 ( ' <& & !' '
( & ) & 2-"- +0+ 1. 1-3+-% ( '8 ' ! ( ! : ;( <& &
) ! < ' ! & : ; ( ,& ) ! < ) & +",+ < '8 '
<& & ! : ; ( ) & A ' ) ) ,& +",+
* ) 8& ' 8 !'
FB<= 1 ,,%$ 7 + ! )
7 1 !*% $ , 7 !, $ 7 , $ !#77 $ ) 7
) $ &3 , $ 1 % & ! + # $% , 7 FBFB + !
!$) * #% +1 7 %
, $% 7 FB<C 1 & # $& +$ 1 $& :# ! $ ) 1

7$ 7 $ 41 4 1 ,*4!, 1 1 1 # !$ & <DDC 7 # $
7 #! 1 %, $ %% $ $ ) , $ %% +$ ) 7% 2$ $%$ * +1$&1 $ #
%% + 7 ! &1$ ) 2 &$!$ ) FB<F 1 ! % 1$! # 1
# $& $ 7 1 1 !#&1 7$ ! # $ %* +
$ ! #& 1 , $ $ !# & 1 #)1 1 K
$& #,,% % !# & %$&* , $% FF' FB<C 1 + ! $!$ *
# ! 7 1 7$ J' +1$&1 $! 1$ , * 7
1 , $ ! 4 !#% $ #, * 1 $& % 7$% ! 7 1
$ !# ! , $ * ! $& ! 1 * 1 $& % $2 # !
, $! !# $ :# ! 7 1 4 4 , 1 1 1 !, &$7$& %%*
! &1 7 && 1 #,! $ ! 1 1$ ) 1 1 ,, !$ & 1
$!$ ! # F<' FB<C 1 7$% <BB , ) +$ 1 # 1 $&
$& % 7$% ! !#,, 1 &% $ ) $ ' 7 # #! , !' 7#! !
&3 +% ) 1 # $ ) 1 &# , $ 7 $& %$&* 2&1 ) !' 1
+$%% ! 3 1 $& #,,% % %
1 & ! $ * %$& , ' !, &$7$& %%* & $ % 3 0 $ ) ' 1 !

) ) $ !% & , $) 7 !! , , $ ! !$ & FBB=' +1$&1 $ &%#
! % 7 %! ! ! 1 + ! $ #! $ $% %% 7 1 &$ $%
& $ $ % &% $ ! $ 7 % ! & # ! 1 1 1 ! 7$% !$ & FBB=
1 ! 77 ! $ &%# 7 $& %% ) $ ! 7 % $%% !! 7 $& & $ $ $ !
#! # #! $ %# * ,!*&1$ $& & $ !' >BF , $ $ ! $! 1 !
77 ! 1 $%% ) % & $ $ % $ %# * ,!*&1$ $& & $ ! +1$&1 1
4 4 4 #! ! 7#! 1 , !& $, $ ! 7 , $ $& $ !
!#% $ ) $ !! # & , $) & $ $ % & !,$ &* & $ % 3
& ! 7 ! #& $ 7 6#! $&
& +",+ & * ' * ' * ' ) ! ( )

*&( ' ' ) ,& ( 8' & ) < ?
& ! % !,$ %
& ! )$ % $& %
1 * ! ,$ $%* & $&
0 $ #%%$ ' * $%% $%* & $&
$ $ ! ) ' 0# % # 77$&
2, !!' 1 ! + 77$&
& ! % ! $& # ) *
,& +",+ & 8 ' & ) < ' & * 8 & * '
8)) & C ' < & 8 ?
, 1 ,$ !' 1 # ! +1$ %, % 1!
!! ) 1 ,$ !
! 4 $)1 1 ,$ !
&1$ ) !$& 2&$!$ )
. %3$ )
0$&*&%$ )
,& +",+ 8 (8 & ) < ' ' ! ' ' & & ?
$& , $%! 7 ! $%
$% $! $ #,! $ ! 1
* ,, &3 3 & !
. %3
$& , % &
% ,# !3 ! +1$% #!$ ) 1 & ,#
1 ! !
F 4 >7 ,$&3 ! #! $ 6 & ! +$ 1 # $ )
* 6#! % 0 +$ 1 $ $ ) 1 % + #,, )$ !
, % / ,& * & ' 98 & & 8 ' ) & !

8 8' 8 ' & ) < ?
J 0
)* * * ( '
) ** 8 ( 8 * * * ( 8 ' 8 '
) ' !' B 8' <& * : * ' 8 &(* ;
)* ) < ) ! ( ! B ') '
) &* 8' ) (B ) ' B '* )
) ' ) ) * < 8' C <
) ) ' ) ! # < < - 3 8 '

0 '" ! - ' ,& ) &( D D $! 0&
0 ) 5 ' ' ' ' ) *8 *
' ! 8 ! ) 8 * * ( & ' 8
) 98
) ) ' ) ! B * & ' ' ! ( ** 8 (

8 & * ' 8
(! C * ! ! ) ( 8 ) < & 8
) )&
)) ' ) ! ( 8 ) * ' ( ! C &

) ' & *8 < )) '
)) * &* '8 ' C )
) 8 ** 8
%$ $ * ) &* 6# & $ 7 %$ 7/
,& > * F8 & * ( 8 & * (

- ( + 98 1 )?
; & & 98 ( * ! ' ' * & &

' F8 ( * ' (' B
; & 98 ( < 8 ' 8 ) )8 98 & ) '

( & 8 ) 98 < 8 ( & & ' *
& * ' B
; & * ( 98 < * * ( & * & 8 > '

' (* & '< )8 '8 B
@; & & ! ( C & & ) ' & &

< ) & < ' & C ( * ! & B
; & & 98 C ( 8 ' & )) ' ! (B '
; & * ( 98 < '! ( )) & *8
0
1 ,% $ ! 3! $ $ %$ 7 7 1 $ 1 7 7
J
4 4
# *
5555558 8555555555555
' $ $)
(
!! " # $%% & '
)$! $ !*% $
+++ ))% % $ ) #, &

! & 9) $% &
/ + % * ) $ $ # % ' ? <F=B
' & ! ' !*% $ ' <GCB> ' & ( & + A (
) & + G ' ) & 6 ' ) & + ) 8 '
' ' & + & * <& 8 ) < & ( - ( + 98
) 1 ) ,& *8 * ) & ' 8 : ; '! & 0 8 ( 0 8 ) 0
< ' )) ) & * * ) & ' ) 0 8 (
G ' C 'H ' ' *8 8 '
': ; F8 '' ' ) & * * ) & ! ' '&
# $! !, !$ % 7 , & $ ) $ ! &$ $L ! 7 % ! 1
& %* 1 !!' ' # ' & #! $& $ ! & $ !#$&$ 1 #)1
) $L ! %3$ ) % & $& # . 8 ' & ' &
) 5 ! & & ! * & <& * )
& + C & * ' ) ( )) ( ' ! 5 ! 8
* ' G ' C ' & * ' & * )
* ) ( 8 < & & & & 8 ' & )8 * 8 ) ( * ' )
& C * <& & ! ' ( ! & ' ( &8 & ,&
8 ( ' '( * * * ( 8 * * ( ' 8 & !
8 ) FD * ?!@ $ &%# ' # %$ $ 1 7 %% +$ )
$& $ $L $ K!/
0% 3 $ ) * + %%$ ) !# # $ )! +$ 1 % & ) $& )*

0 $ ) * * +$ 1 $%$ $ ) % & $& $ $,#% $ 77 & !
$ & )* . , ! #!$ ) $ 0 * 0 $ 2
' 8 < & * ' 0 ! D '
8 ! 0D ' ' ! 8 ') ' 8 ! & *
! ( C 8 ! ) * C () # '- (# !
( & G ' < & * & & ' G ' C ' & & !
' ' * ' < ) ' ' * ) A A
& C < >* ' ' * ' ' * ) 8 & 8 <
C < * ' C ) * ) ( *&( ( * '
* ( &
$ ) * 1 #)1 ! $ ! !$ ) &1 % )$ ! % 8 8
A '8 & ! < 3 8 & '
8 ' I 8 J & '8 ! 8 B (
* & C ) ( '
3$ ) %%* N1 ; 1 !K $& ! 1 #)1 1 $& + 1 $ ) 77 &
* 1 $& 8 % % , 1* ' >* * &(H ( &
* &( < & )8 @H '8 & * %& )8
* &( ' '8 ' ! & 8
< & ) 8 9 8' + 0H0+ K < ' 0 ' )
8 8 ! < & ) * ,& & ' C < ! (& +
C < ' >* #8 ' & ! * & < &
* & ' ) ) & '8 0 ! '
8 9 < & ' ) <& & ( ' & (< + (* &
8 ' * & ( & ' ) * ' * ! 4 ' ) *
# 1 & 2+ ' 6 * ! ( & *
& * & < & 8' * & # 1 ' *
<& & ( ' ( 8 ) -! (& & ( 8 ( ' ' ( 8 9
) ! ' & + ) < & & 8 & & '
8 ' ) < & < * C & '(
@ , $ $ ) 7 !% , # # % )$& % $ $ 4 ( ->* ' *

# * ! , & F8 '8 * ' ) A 4 ( < & C ) *
) # '- ( % * C C & ': ;B '& ) < B '
< && ) * &(
#&$ ) , $! #! ) ! $ $ 2$ ! $ *1 >* ' >

:0& ) L; & !( ' 4 ' * & 0 (
# * ' & 8& 1 ->* ' C & < 8' 8
' GG & 8 ' *8 % ) ' < ' & 8 &
' 8 ( & G ) ) & , 8 C 8 ' '
C + >* ' C ) <& ' * <& C ' 8'
* ( , C 8 '8 C
$ ) ! %3 !! 7 $ 1$&% ! %$L$ ) * 1 8
& 5 C $ G ' C A ' 8 ' ( + 8'
8 8 8 & ) 8 ' ( B ! 8 ) ) & B ' *8
0 * & ! ) ' A B B A ' 0 * <
' ! 8 *8 )) ' ' ) ' '8 ,&
G ' C C ' ' ! '8 < ' 8 ) <
( ,& G ' C ' & ) < ' ! <&
! ) (! 0 ) , C & (& ! 8 '
' C ( 8 ' < ! ! ' *
,,$ ) ?0#))$ )@ * ,1 ! 0 * ) *& ** H * < '
" < / ( 2 A < & ! D " < / ( & C '
*& ,& < ' ( 2 * 0 (! A
+ @ * < & * 8 < ) ' < & & (! ( 5
$)) 8 & (! : ( M C; ' ) < & *&
' * ( * * * ' 8 0 *8 D C *
< ) ' 8& & 0 8 ( ) ' & 0( 0 8 ) & '
28 8 )+ !
A 0% &3%$! $ ) $ 1 % 3 ' * ) * ( ' < &

& (! ( 5 ' & 0 8 ( D8 1
0 A
. 3,% & $ ) ->* ' A 4 5 8* '

D > ) D & + '8 ' )8 0 + H A ' *
' '8 '& % ) ' 8 ) G 8 )
& '&
# %$& $ ) 8 (* ' G ' C ' & <

* * ' & ! ( & ( & ) < * ? ,& 0 8 (
0 8 & 8 ,& 0 8 ( 8 ( & (! 0 C ' &
4 ! 6 ! ( ( ' 6 ! ( $)) + < ! 8 * 8 ' I"
, * J " A *8 * 0 8 ( & (
< & 8 98 8 + < * ) C ' & ) & *8
* ,& 0 8 ( 8 ( ' & 4 ! 6 ! ( C < ( (
*8 ) ( * *8 < ! ' G ' 'H & C ' * 8
2 C C < ( ( ) ' * > $& 8' ' ( &8 & ) < &* ! 8 '
8 ' ( )) 0 * & ! ) ' ' & 8
'< &! 8 8&
, # ->* ' < & * ) ! & 8 & ' )

" " < 4 ' * ' + 0H0+ " ) I + J ,& '
! ! ' ! & & ' ' ' & ' ' ( < ' & <
' 8 )) & ' <( + ' & ' ) ' 8
' 8 ' ) ' AA & 6 ' #
0 8 ) & - # ) (!
H$%%$ ) 0 < C ' < & * & 0 8 ( D8

& ' & 8& 1 # *
%% ) % $ ! 7 8 , $ ! A D " < / ( &
B AB ' 8 ' 1 * '
8 < & & 8& 1 # * ) 0
(! 'D ( ! + 8 0 *
@ %% ) % , !! !!$ ! * A ' 8 )
D H * ( '0 ' 8 ) '' 8
1*!$& % !! #% ! $ C ' ) ' * < & * * $ 0 )

' & 0 ( ) * < ) ' ' ') &
%! ! ! ->* ' A ' & ' &

0 < & ) (! 0 8 ( 0 8 ) 0 ,& )
< & & < ' '* 8 &
%! , $! ! * ' ( 0 8 ( A < &

& ' ' ' ) ' ( < & & ' ' ,& # (
) * ) < '< & ) * ) 8* !
<& & < ) ' ) 8 B & < ! < 8 ( ' *8 * )8 (
' 8 ' ' )8 8 ' ,& ** * ** < ) ' <& & 8 ' (
) ' ( )) * ,& < & & 8 ' (
!
A !*&1$ $& #! ! +$ 1 %! #$&$ %% ) $ ! 7 , !8 %3 ! $

A 8 ) ' & * G ) ! & 8 ( * D " <
/ ( ' 8 ( ) 8 * ( & '
8 ,& < ) 8'8 ' *& ( * ( * * ,&
8& 1 & ' ! ) & < * ! ) 8'
%$! , * A D " < / ( & B

AB ' 8 ' 1 * ' 8
< & & 8& 1 # * ) 0 (! ' D ( !
+ 8 0 * ( *8 & ! ' ' * < &! 8
F8 * B '!' ' B * B & 8 & ' B ** B 4
8 & ! * ' + & * ( < ! ) *8 & ' '
< ! ' C & < ' & ' 8 ' 8' '
8 ( * * ( ' & 8' ' *8 ' & <
& 8 & ' ' &
! $)1 $ ) ,& ) & ' 8 * ( & '8 ( !
' &' * ' A & 0 ' 8 '
* 0 & < *8 ' ' ' ,& I & J< ( '
& 8 & < * ' * & ( & ) ) ' ,& ' (
' ) (& 8 < 8 ' * ( & < ) '8 ' 8 8* 8 (
"8 8 * < ' * A
1 7 ! 7 , * !' ' ( ! 8 * * 8 '

' *
%$! 8 #&3 & ! >* ' ( ) *& (

8 8 ) ' < ) ' ) ) * ( & < )
( * * ' C 4 ' 8 8 * & 0 (
# *
2$& 1 $& % #!$ ) # $ ) ! ->* ' 8 <&

*8 * % 98 < & 'H) 8 ( * 1 &
8 ' G ' C
@ ,# &3$ ) 0 *8 D C * < ) ' 8& &

0 8 ( ) ' & 0( 0 8 ) & ' 28 8 )+ !
"8 8 * 8 & ! 8 ' 0 * ) *& & C <
* ' % ' < 8 (& C ' ' C ))
- ' 8 ' 8 ' ) ' < ) & C ' 8 (
* ) & ( 8' & ! < &' < ! *
* %3$ ) 4 0 * 4 ) 8 . &
4 2 ' ' & 2+ 0( 0 6
7 & 8 % *8 1 7 7 $%! * ' 6 )

* ' & ) '' A + A & ! ' !
* & 6 + * 5 <& & ! 8 !
8 ' ' 8 & ' & ' ** '
% & ) $& . , ! #!$ ) #!&% , ! !8 ,!

>* ' * $ >* < <& +< (& 8 ' &
* ' *< ! ( ) ) 8 :( 8 8 ( ' ! 8 8
<& & * ' (& '8 ' < ;+& ' < 8 ) & & 8 ) ' <
A % & ) $& . , ! #!$ ) 2# % $ #% $ >* '
& !,$ %$L $ ! ' D * G A : ; ) & 8 ' )

' ( B ) ' ( B ) ! & 8 <& ! ) (
8 (B ' ) A' ( ' * 0 G 0 ) D8 1 &
' A
$,#% $ 1 7 7 &# ! "8 8 & ) ' *8 )

' 8 ' 8 & * * ' ) & ! 8 ' A
4 ) & H4 ) A ' & 8 8 ' 8 & !
* "8 8 * & ! ) '< & < ) A
/ + & ! , ' + ' ! '8 ,+ ' 3 C ( A + A +

< & <& :*8 ' 0 * ' ' 8& '
8' '8 < & 2 & # ) 0 + ;
' ) ' + N 0 + 0 <& <
:-! (& ) , ( ( 08 2 ; + F ! 8& ) ' <
! ' ) E 2 ' 8' ( & 6 ' ( ' ! &
) ' 20H" < H ' " & ,& ( < ) 8 ' ' '
& 'F8 ' ( & < ) (! + < & & ' ' < '
( * + 0 -> 8 ! :0 ! ' 4 ' ) & 2 # 8'; & * )
) & * & 8 & )) '6 ' 0& 0
+ 0 < # * ) # ) :#$#; 0 ' * < & 6 '

+ 7 & ( 7 $ ) 7 ) <
9 O < & & " 8 ( ( " ) 4 ' 4 ( ' ( )
& " !( 2 ( 1 ( + < & 2 ' ) # ) + 0 ' < & 2 ' )
# ) ** + 0 * +0 +0 < &8 ' )
& < & * ) & # ) + ( #+ * 1
3 < <& & +0 ' 9 + < * ' & 2 ( 1 ( + ' ' &
) ( ) # ) 8 ' & ) 0 ' 8 ) & + 0 '
, ' + & ( 7 +< 8 * 9 ) & # ) '! '
1 & 9 ( # 1 < & & " + 8 ) ' ' ' , & (
"+ , ' ,+4+, ,& * 9 ' ! * ' * & * ) & ' ! * ) *8 '
* & ( + < ! ! ' & '' ) & # * ) # )
' < & ) & + A + < C ' ' ** & ' (
* ( ) & " 8 ( ( " . C (! <& ' ( *
< < & & " 8 & I ' ( J + +< ' ' ( # ) +
( #+ )) 8 8 ( 8 , > ' < F8 ' '
! < ' ' ( ! ) ' ) ' 8 ) ! & 8 + < ' '
' ( )) ) ( 4( & ( &( 8 , > & ' ! )( (
! * ' & ) & +< ( < && * (
4( ) & ' & < * ) 6 " !( >* & @ 7 ' >* '
( & * &( & 7 A 7 ' 7 8 ' ' ' 8 & & '
8& 'B ' ) ( * ! < & & * & ' & 4 ( 8 & ) &
# 8 9 ) ' & & < C ( ! -, >* ! ( &
* &( D ' ' 8 * 8 ' & <& & C >* '* '<
< C D 8 ' & " < . C 0 ( * 4 # ( % C ' )
& * & ! & * ' & ) ' > < C & ' ' ) ' ) )
8
Lancaster 7 of#Common
County Court %* 1 $ $ ) Page
Pleas 7 1$!16 of 813
1 $! !#!,$&$ #! $ September
1 1 1 22, 2016
6#! & $ 1$! OGB'BBB , * # 7 1$! $ 1 $ & 7 1$! 1 ' * '
+1 1 , !! $ FBBB <DIBP ,&
< && < & & < *
4( & < & 6 & 7 ' + < ! ) & #

>* 4K6 ,1 & 7 ' ! ) 8 ' : 8 * 8 8 ' < &
' ' * ; 2 0 ) A@B ,& +",+ & ' ) ' " G '
0 * & 0 ) (5 D ' ' (* *
& ' & & & I ' #J <& & 6
$ G ' C ' & A ) < & *8 ) ) 8'

< & + 0 ) C & A 7 + & 8 & & ( ' < ' = (
! < '= #8 & & 0 8 ' ( < ' A '
$ G ' C 'D ' & ) ) C >* ' (, ' + ' ! '8
< ! ( ' + & 6 * ' ' 8 ' 8 8 )
* &(B ( & * &(B ' * ' 8 & 8 & & 8 ) ' ' (
' ! 'H < * ,& 8 < ' &
8 8 ( < & & ) ) & ) ' 6 # 0 8 ) 0 ,-12$"- !
0 8 ( ! AA
,& & 8 ' ! ( * ) ( ) ' 8 ** ' 8 &

* ( & ' ) & 0 8 ( ) (! ) * *
# *
555555555558 8555555555555
' $ $)
(
!! " # $%% & '
)$! $ !*% $
<<< 8*
G<G4CCD4F<C>
# 7
- .
+ 1 ? , " -. / 0 ,-12$"- ' #3 "0-# 4-#+ 51$6
))
0 " 0+ 55555555555555
,& ))7 (/ 0 ' '! '4 ' 5 8* F8 ( 8 &

>* ' 8 (* * $1#-1 & * !' & ' ' >* ' 8 ) F8 '
& ' '
55555555555555555555555555555555555
# '?
# *
58 8555555555555
' $ $)
(
!! " # $%% & '
)$! $ !*% $
+++ ))% % $ ) #, &

! & 9) $% &
-OD+2+,
Stan J. Caterbone
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
June 21, 2016

P.O. Box 14601
there was no record of my Medical Matrix Health Review in your records. In addition, I called the
Medicare hotline and they disclosed that it is very likely that you would cover the purchase and
install of a whirlpool spa for my bathroom. Enclosed is my documentation for your review and
considerations for my claim. I have included medical reports, prescriptions of pain medications,
and product specifications. The whirlpool spa that I selected is the only available spa that will fit
in my bathroom. My home was built in 1952 and is a 1000 sq. ft. row home in Lancaster, Pa.
soon as possible with your reply.
Respectfully,


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Stan J. Caterbone
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
June 21, 2016

P.O. Box 14601
there was no record of my Medical Matrix Health Review in your records. In addition, I called the
Medicare hotline and they disclosed that it is very likely that you would cover the purchase and
install of a whirlpool spa for my bathroom. Enclosed is my documentation for your review and
considerations for my claim. I have included medical reports, prescriptions of pain medications,
and product specifications. The whirlpool spa that I selected is the only available spa that will fit
in my bathroom. My home was built in 1952 and is a 1000 sq. ft. row home in Lancaster, Pa.
soon as possible with your reply.
Respectfully,


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
C6032 BW Combination Bathtub | Watertech Whirlpools and Airbaths http://watertechtn.com/product/c6032-bw-combination-bathtub/
$2,967.00
Humana/Medicare Whirlpool Documentation Page 1 of 89 June 20, 2016
1 of 4 6/8/2016 3:32 PM

Contact us
2 of 4 6/8/2016 3:32 PM
$3,674.00 $4,213.00 $4,083.00

Contact us
3 of 4 6/8/2016 3:32 PM

Contact us
4 of 4 6/8/2016 3:32 PM
C6032 Elite Combination Bathtub | Watertech Whirlpools and Airbaths http://watertechtn.com/product/c6032-elite-combination-bathtub/
$3,674.00
1 of 4 6/8/2016 3:34 PM

Contact us
2 of 4 6/8/2016 3:34 PM

Contact us
3 of 4 6/8/2016 3:34 PM
$4,213.00 $4,413.00
$5,055.00

Contact us
4 of 4 6/8/2016 3:34 PM
Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 47-1 Filed 05/01/16 Page 29 of 67
Medical
Medical File
Filefor
for
for
Humana/Medicare Matrix
Matrix
Matrix
Medical
Medical
Medical
Whirlpool Appt.
Nurse
Documentation Page
Page65
Page 64of
21 of106
of 142
89 Friday,
Friday,June
April
April 22,
20, 2016
Medical
Medical File
Filefor
for
for
Matrix
Matrix
Medical
Medical
Medical
Whirlpool Appt.
Nurse
Documentation Page
Page66
Page 65of
22 of106
of 142
89 Friday,
Friday,June
April
April 22,
20, 2016
Private Criminal Complaint
Humana/Medicare re Pain
Whirlpool Meds
Documentation 17 of 49
Page 23 89 Wednesday, January
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Medical
Medical File
Filefor
for
for
Matrix
Matrix
Medical
Medical
Medical
Whirlpool Appt.
Nurse
Documentation Page
Page69
Page 68of
25 of106
of 142
89 Friday,
Friday,June
April
April 22,
20, 2016
Medical
Medical File
Filefor
for
for
Matrix
Matrix
Medical
Medical
Medical
Whirlpool Appt.
Nurse
Documentation Page
Page70
Page 69of
26 of106
of 142
89 Friday,
Friday,June
April
April 22,
20, 2016
Medical
Medical File
Filefor
for
for
Matrix
Matrix
Medical
Medical
Medical
Whirlpool Appt.
Nurse
Documentation Page
Page71
Page 70of
27 of106
of 142
89 Friday,
Friday,June
April
April 22,
20, 2016
Medical
Medical File
Filefor
for
for
Matrix
Matrix
Medical
Medical
Medical
Whirlpool Appt.
Nurse
Documentation Page
Page72
Page 71of
28 of106
of 142
89 Friday,
Friday,June
April
April 22,
20, 2016
Medical
Medical File
Filefor
for
for
Matrix
Matrix
Medical
Medical
Medical
Whirlpool Appt.
Nurse
Documentation Page
Page73
Page 72of
29 of106
of 142
89 Friday,
Friday,June
April
April 22,
20, 2016
Medical
Medical File
Filefor
for
for
Matrix
Matrix
Medical
Medical
Medical
Whirlpool Appt.
Nurse
Documentation Page
Page74
Page 73of
30 of106
of 142
89 Friday,
Friday,June
April
April 22,
20, 2016
Medical
Medical File
Filefor
for
for
Matrix
Matrix
Medical
Medical
Medical
Whirlpool Appt.
Nurse
Documentation Page
Page75
Page 74of
31 of106
of 142
89 Friday,
Friday,June
April
April 22,
20, 2016
Medical
Medical File
Filefor
for
for
Matrix
Matrix
Medical
Medical
Medical
Whirlpool Appt.
Nurse
Documentation Page
Page76
Page 75of
32 of106
of 142
89 Friday,
Friday,June
April
April 22,
20, 2016
Medical
Medical File
Filefor
for
for
Matrix
Matrix
Medical
Medical
Medical
Whirlpool Appt.
Nurse
Documentation Page
Page77
Page 76of
33 of106
of 142
89 Friday,
Friday,June
April
April 22,
20, 2016
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PRIVATE
COUNTY OF: CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
Magisterial District Number:
January 27, 2016 at 6:53am
MDJ Name: Hon . COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

VS.
Address:
DEFENDANT:
NAME and ADDRESS
Southeast Medical Clinic at Brightside Church
Telephone: ( ) Hershey Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
Patient First Urgent Care
Docket No.: Butler Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17601
Date Filed:
OTN:
(Above to be completed by court personnel) (Fill in defendants name and address)
Notice: Under Pa.R.Crim.P. 506, your complaint may require approval by the attorney for the Commonwealth before it can be
accepted by the magisterial district court. If the attorney for the Commonwealth disapproves your complaint, you may
petition the court of common pleas for review of the decision of the attorney for the Commonwealth.
Fill in as much information as you have.
Defendants Race/Ethnicity Defendants Sex Defendants D.O.B. Defendants SID (State Identification Number)
White Black Female Not Available

Asian Native American Male Not Available
Hispanic Unknown
Defendants A.K.A. (also known as) Defendants Vehicle Information Defendants Drivers License Number
Plate Number State Registration Sticker (MM/YY) State
None Known
I, Stanley J. Caterbone 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA 17603

(Name of Complainant-Please Print or Type)
do hereby state: (check appropriate box)
1. x I accuse the above named defendant who lives at the address set forth above
I accuse the defendant whose name is unknown to me but who is described as
I accuse the defendant whose name and popular designation or nickname is unknown to me and whom I have
therefore designated as John Doe
with violating the penal laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at Southeast Medical Clinic, Hershey Ave.
(Place-Political Subdivision)
Lancaster, PA 17603 and Patient First Urgent Care on Butler Avenue, Lancaster, PA 17603
in Lancaster County County on or about January 21, 2016
Participants were: (if there were participants, place their names here, repeating the name of the above defendant)
Dr. Theresa Jerrel of Patient First and Douglass Leahman, MD of Southeast Medical Clinic at
Brightside Church, Hersehy Avenue, Lancaster. Both did refuse to provide adequate medical care
and refuse to prescribe pain medications, the reason for the visits while also HARASSING ME!
AOPC 411A-10 Page 1 of 2

Whirlpool Meds
Documentation Page
Page 1 of
43 of49
89 Wednesday, January
June 27,
20, 2016
Defendants Name: PRIVATE
Docket Number: CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
2. The acts committed by the accused were:

(Set forth a summary of the facts sufficient to advise the defendant of the nature of the offense charged. A citation to the statute allegedly violated, without more,
is not sufficient. In a summary case, you must cite the specific section and subsection of the statute or ordinance allegedly violated. The age of the victim at the
time of the offense may be included, if known. In addition, social security numbers and financial information (e.g. PINS) should not be listed. If the identity
of an account number must be established, list only the last four digits. 204 Pa.Code 213.1 - 213.7. )
I have been seen by both Dr. Theresa Jerell and by Southeast Medical Clinic prior to
January 21, 2016 for the sole purpose of continuing my pain medications that were
previously prescribed by Dr. Brian Sullivan of Abbeyville Family Clinic. Dr. Sullivan
prescribed a regime of Naproxen and Hydrocodene, as evidenced on the Lancaster General
Hospital Plastic Surgery Visit Summation of December 11, 2015. Both Dr. Jarell and
Dr. Leahman not only refused to provide pain prescriptions, but the also engaged in
a whosale methodology of harassment akin to torture, given the severity of pain that
I am experiencing.
It is even more concerning that in the summer of 2015 I started this attempt at gaining
pain medications to treat the severity of pain that I am experiencing. It is now,
January
27, 2016 and I am still trying to find a remedy to my pain. On a scale of One to Ten,
as
often asked by the medical community, my pain is at least a ten. My pain gets so bad
that at nights I cannot walk and must use a walker. On several tript to Harrisburg, to
continue my efforts at getting Pennsylvania Legislative Support for my proposed
Anti-Stalking and Harassment Legislation, I had to turn around and go home for not
being able to walk.
The fact that Lancaster General Hospital is an ACTIVE DEFENDANT in an OPEN Case in both
state and federal courts, and considering thier NO TRESPASS NOTICE of 2010 that DENIES
ME ACCESS AND TREATMENT AT ANY LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL AFFILIATED MEDICAL FACILITY
Demonstrates that the only intention is to PROVIDE A MEANS OF DEALING WITH THE
PAIN FROM TORTURE WITHOUT ADEQUATE MEDICAL CARE, WHICH CAN BE CONSTRUED AS ATTEMPTED
MURDER, at some level of the law.
All of which were against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and contrary to the Act of
Assembly, or in violation of and to be completed at a later time
(Section) (Subsection)
of the
(PA Statute)
3. I ask that process be issued and that the defendant be required to answer the charges I have made.
4. I verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or information and
belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section 4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa.C.S. 4904)
relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
January 27, 2016 /S/ Stanley J. Caterbone
Date Signature of Complainant
Office of the Attorney for the Commonwealth Approved Disapproved because:
(Name of Attorney for Commonwealth-Please Print or Type) (Signature of Attorney for Commonwealth) (Date)
AND NOW, on this date , I certify that the complaint has been properly completed and verified.
(Magisterial District) (Issuing Authority)

SEAL
AOPC 411B-10 Page 2 of 2

Whirlpool Meds
Documentation Page44
Page 2 of
of49
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
Page 3 of
of49
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
Page 4 of
of49
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
Page 5 of
of49
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
Page 6 of
of49
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
Page 7 of
of49
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
Page 8 of
of49
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
Page 9 of
of49
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
!
" # " $% & '& ( ) * +

*
, *
* *- * . *
( /
* *
* **
* *- * *
* ( * .
0 1 234456 #& " * +! *
" 7( 8 * 296
!
" # $ %& ' %
( ( )

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
& *
) +
) & * ( +
) ,
-) ' +
-) & .)/)
- ) !*
- ) ( +
- ) *
0) + 1
( 2 +
(
0) 3 * 4 "5 % 6+ ( 7%
/ + + * 8 *
0 ) & * *1 9
0 ) & * +
0 ) &
0 -) +
0-) & +
0- ) + 9
+
0- ) :(

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 3
* * * ; * *
< ( <(
= ; * ** > " # +
. ** (
& * * 344?
& *
2 6
* *
* * *
* * ,
3445
#& +* ( *
. @
* A
. * * * *
& B /
* C
. * .
C *
B
& * / * *
=
>. * D54 " = 7( A 8

7 8 " &
# +A * *
A " 1 ,
. * #" '
" / ( +
* & * .
> . ' <( (
' D % > *
, & = #(
B = * +
C . * C

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 :
E & '
* #* + *
" 344F #& < , * D- " +

( . . * # + )
3G9 ( ! # )% 7 * * 8 -
, C " . *
" DDF H +
) +
< * * * 344? ! "#

# " ! "' * '
* " ' # + B " B
# * . + *
# * <( AE"+
" # + # + * *
* * #" *
. * + )* * *
* . D54
" $ % &
# + & " ' #

+ * *
B C **
B * * " > *
B #* I
" +
#% + B *
# +
* # + &
. .
* * )
-J ; =#
& * * *
. ' *- +
& B *# +

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 9
& < * ( *, 1 2 (,1 6 <
* E 2 E6 * . **
7 (,1 E8 *
2 * &6 *
* **
& * * *-
* . -
* K . *
& B * & &

*- . -
%
&
& (,1 E ** & A

< % * & & *
* **
** * -
& ** **
* *
* * " .
&
( * * &
& A < % *
& ! ! & !
:4 344F
. (,1 E
E *
* * &" 2 * 6

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 G
)& * (
+
& * ** *1 * *
D94 L ) 2 * 6
DG4 & 344G ' % & () $
1 H *
B * # 7 8
* ) *
" * ; - ' * * ( *
" *, > ; A * 1 ( *
> " * + 2H 3 D6
# + =
A DG4 D?3 " -

** *
* / *
"* C * * . "
* - . * .
B *
. *
*
" -* .
' , M
* * * *
# - +2 " &
36
* * <(
B * B * " '
D?: L ' DF: ,
; 1 ( C' 344: * " B
; * -
2 " & 96

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 ?
) ,
. # + =
& " ' * # + *

# + # *- * +
* * **
1 * *
. *
*
& * * B
*- * *
- . * * 2 " & 9-G6
" 3449 1 ! #& *
*
* * +2 " & D6
-) ' +
& $* ; / F 3445 $
+ , #& E ( ! 1 H " " ' ( " +
L ( . # + =
& 7L ( 8 / *
* ) *
** *
*
* * . '
' * * *
*
' B * L;E
' " *

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 5
-) & .)/)
& * " " -
" &
* B " "
" # + -
- * C C $+ ,!
& 3445 ' & - & "# "
<( & * . *
. =
& / D9F 1 , 7 8
** ; C * &
* * )
; & J
#H ; " + 2 ?9-G6
( " ** , *
* 2 ??6
& # +)
( 5 E * - &
"
" " * *
* " ** B
) " * *
& * E
, "
7& " 8 * *
D?5 . I
< E ' " *

* / * &
; " **
> ( *
2 9F36

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 F
- ) !*
( " - D54
* 3D D5D #E "
* - >** ! " D54 ( + =
* " ( * &
" ' -
D54
* " -
C L-<H&1 -
E -
/ ' )** *1
& )1 C D?4 E
> H * * #* +
& / *
* & *
C H ( * > " &
" -*
DG4 * - . D?4 .
* * )1 * -
/ L-<H&1 /
" 9 DF5 C H ( *
$ . $ = #>. C 2%">16
** B
L<H&1 " * DG4 +
( D5D #( * & "
+ * * * * 2* 6 B & "
# * ** B
+ E #7 8 * * +

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 D
- ) ( +
% * " ( *
* ( N) DD9
/ =# ; - '
* <( ' ; ' & * - =
" * D?4 + E , -
1 9G
0 1 2$ &.
* *
% &) < ( *
# - + - &
* ** * *
( B * .
* A
& 2 "
6
* - C *
2 -* B
- * B 6* ** &
*
* * C CC
* * "
* -
& ** * *
* ** ,
* B & * * *
" * *
- * I
1 * * / * *
-
* * ** N **
"
* *
= . .
& *
* . * C

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 4
- ) *
. =
" !" /
* *
> !< *
3 1 ! *
: !" * '
9 ! " ' #
+ I *
* .
2 ! 36
& -
* * C
* 344G ! , / 3 # # (. 453 -
, 1 ( *
* ;
* & * * & *
!# C * **
* +
) * # +# +
# +
* " B /
/ # + B
( ? 3445 / ; -
" &6 1 7/7 &6 ! # -
6 $ $ $ , # *<(
* C +

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016
& ! *# *
+ # A . " +
7& 8# * * * * *
C )
* * ! *
* "
*
* / * .
* * & +
0) + 1
( 2 +
(
E # + B *
* C
% " ' * -
# + * *
C &
* '
*
* *
& *# + -

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 3
0) 3 * 4 "5 %
6+ ( 7% / + + *
8 *
& . * * *
&
*# +
& . " # +
-
& DF9 " &I 4 * ) > 17

8 * L ) =
" DG4 &

** > 1* B
" *
& ( C 1 * > 1
H H I , . H * ( <
" # +& 1
* * DG4
H " **
N 4 *> 1
. B . H > 1* B
& H L *
3 * 1 ( DDF J A
; &I , * *
*# +( =
" % DG9 " *

# & +* * E *
( "
L;E
H * . *
" .
) %% / # * "
1A ; @+ % DFG E E
*( * * *
& *
E #" " *

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 :
+ : D5? 6 ! # ( (
+ 1 * =
& * "
&
** -
# + #(
2 6
+
# * *
*
+
: 1 * $+ ,! #& ( ; +
. " B " 9
344G 1
2& * E &I I O F?::96
* * * ; E "'
. " -
, * * ; E
#* + #" * ** +
. E
* " B
E *
/ ' "
* * >
7) 8 ' *
" * / E
" 9F *E *
& * * ** * ; (
, '
( " 7 *
8
) * * " * * B
M * * *
* * '
) H

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 9
(
*; "' * * B
* B
" ' ' . ** &

" ' '
** ' * ** '
& " '
0 )& * *1 9
B ; ;
. * * = *
** #
* *
+ . =
* * ; *; ( 344: <(
* " B ; 1 ( C *
" * *
*- *
> ! *
2 / 6
( / ! / * 2
* 6
" !" * :4
* ! >. * *
M H H !< *
I /
( !< * 2 6
2 D6

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 G
0 )& * +
# + =
& "
* B *
<= ( " DG4 , *

/ 9F * / *
7 ** 8# / '
+
< ( *- * E " H , **
H , * *- *
DG4
* " * L;E' B
* *
<> A M (
* . % , C
*
7 8
*
* * 2 " &
9 ! :3-::6
E / ' D?4 * 44
* 34 -,
*
2 ! ::6
& * " B . .
. & *
. * *- *
- )
E / ' % "
# * * + # .
*
** +2 ! F-D6

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 ?
. " # + =
" * * ; '
** * .B ) -
J * ** # *
. +& / #
*
+
& * B !#
* *
@+ 2 ! 4- 6
0 )&
-J . B * *
# * + #
+& * . # +*
=
-J * *
* .
' *-
& * ** * .
* & *
* **
* ** E
* .
*
# . C
* + * # * * +
# ' * +
< * *
* # +
/ / K *
/
* * 2 ! 46

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 5
0 -) +
& * &" *
, ; % C *
$ ) DF4 &I - %
DD? . * # +&
. * - * =
H ; % # +
% (
) *
I ; ' *
' >. - *
% * > *
* 34 . ! 4
8 % ' DG5 % '
> *
* * =
* =
# * +
* * C
* -
& *
% - * & # +
&" *
# + C
& *% ' DD? * *

=
I / * -*
* *
,
* "
* **
( I #& 7
8 " +(
* / &

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 F
# +A .
' C
> *
* "
I &I H * B
.
B -
*
& C B
& B B
* * (
# * +* # + * *
'
0-) & +
# *
* @+ -J *
# * =+
* =
3 * =
: # + * =
9 #* + * - *
# . +=
G * * #
+=
? # C
+
& * * * *
" #
B * * '
. * +&
# + # *
* +2 ! 4- 6
" -J "
* &" #
+ -J B 6 * "
( &"

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 D
-J
B 36 * &
*
&" # + :6 96 ?6 -
J B G6 * * #
+ &"
. #
* B * + *
-J ' B ?6 # C
+ &"
. - *
*
0- ) + 9
+
& **
&" # + B
* * * A ' =
& C " ' * #

+ # *- * +
* * **
& * * B *-
* *
- . * * 2 G6
& ** * * * =
* * '
* *
&" * &
*% ' =#
B - * +A
' =
& " ' # +

1 * *
. *
* 2 " &
9-G6

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 34
* # . * *- * +
& * .
& * .
& ** * * * * &"
&" .
* & * *
' &" &" *
* * &" &
* *- *
( ' * * *% '
B * *- * " &"
=
" DD5 ( * / (
> 1
( E "
DDG " * % & *
* " " / *
& * "
*
* "
& * & * * "
* * B *
/
7" 8 . *
*
&" "
* *# +
& * *
& # +

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 3
0- ) :(
, B * .
@ *<(
& *
** * . &
<(
** * !
* *
DG4 * B
& 344F ( ' *

Whirlpool Meds
June 27,
20, 2016 33
PROTHONOTARY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Katherine Wood-Jacobs George Alspach
Prothonotary Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
Case Number
vs.
CI-06-03349
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL (et al.)
PROTHONOTARY DOCKET ENTRIES

04/10/2006 COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE
04/10/2006 CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE (MA) VS LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, (M7)
ET AL
04/28/2006 AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
OF SAME.
04/28/2006 AMENDED CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE VS DR. EMILY PRESSLEY, PSYCHIATRIC
DEPARTMENT AND LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL.
05/16/2006 PRAECIPE-ENTER APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANTS, DR. EMILY PRESSLEY AND
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL. FILED BY MEGAN R. FORD, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
OF SAME.
01/12/2007 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE OF THE SAME.
04/03/2007 JUDGMENT-NON PROS PRAECIPE FOR JUDGMENT OF NON PROS ENTERED AGAINST
PLAINTIFF PURSUANT TO PA.R.C.P. 1037(B), FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF.
04/12/2007 PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 1028 (A)(1)
AND RULE 1028(A)(4) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. FILED BY: MEGAN R.
FORD, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
04/13/2007 PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS TO AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE
1028(a)(1) AND RULE 1028(a)(4) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE WITH
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILED BY: MEGAN R. FORD, ESQ. (SENT TO BUSINESS JUDGE
MADENSPACHER APRIL 17, 2007)
04/16/2007 JUDGMENT-NON PROS PURSUANT TO PA.R.C.P. 1037(B) FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO
SE.
04/18/2007 ORDER ISSUING RULE FILED. AND NOW, UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE ATTACHED
DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE
1028(a)(4) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, IT IS THIS 18 DAY OF APRIL,
2007, HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. A RULE IS ISSUED UPON PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFENDANTS NOT ENTITLED TO THE RELIEF REQUESTED PURSUANT TO THE PRELIMINARY
OBJECTION UNDER RULE 1028(a)(1). 2. PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE
PRELIMINARY OBJECTION UNDER RULE 1028(a)(1) WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS OF THE DATE OF
THIS ORDER. (SEE FILE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). BY THE COURT: MICHAEL J.
PEREZOUS, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICE TO: CHRISTOPHER W. MATTSON, ESQ. (2)
04/23/2007 MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
TO AMEND COMPLAINT. FILED BY: MEGAN R. FORD, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE
SAME.
04/24/2007 ADDENDUM TO COMPLAINT. FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE OF THE SAME. (SEE FILE OF CI-06-07330 FOR ENTIRE DOCUMENT).
04/30/2007 MOTION OF DEFENDANTS TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S PRAECIPE FOR JUDGMENT OF NON PROS.
FILED BY: MEGAN R. FORD, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
04/30/2007 MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE PRAECIPE FOR
JUDGMENT OF NON PROS. FILED BY: MEGAN R. FORD, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE
SAME.
Whirlpool Meds
Page 89 89
(c) CountySuite Prothonotary, Teleosoft, Inc.
Wednesday, January
June 27,
20, 2016

LETTER TO THE UMPC HEALTH PLAN MEDICARE PROGRAM Re Lancaster YMCA Membership and Whirlpool Spa Claim May 6, 2017 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

LETTER TO THE UMPC HEALTH PLAN MEDICARE PROGRAM Re Lancaster YMCA Membership and Whirlpool Spa Claim May 6, 2017 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Stan J.

UMPC HEALTH PLAN MEDICARE PROGRAM

LANCASTER CENTER CITY BRANCH BOARD OF MANAGERS

RE: STANLEY J. CATERBONE

LANCASTER YMCA FREE MEMBERSHIP

Humana Correspondence Office

Dear Claims Department,

FINANCIAL RESOURCES SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY MONTHLY BENEFIT AMOUNT IS

THE INTERNET, COMPUTER, FILES, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES

I) The following capabilities have been seriously degraded or destroyed completely:

1. INTERNET CONNECTION AT 1250 FREMONT STREET DESTROYED (ATT HOTSPOT

1. LOST ACCESS TO FEDERAL ELECTRONIC FILING PACER ACCOUNT (FORCED TO

II) SCANNING OF DOCUMENTS CAPABILITIES DESTROYED; FORCED TO USE THE LANCASTER

2. ANTENNA TV RECEPTION DEGRADED TO ONLY A FEW STATIONS DOWN FROM 11,

3. SMARTPHONE NO MORE BOOKMARKED PDF CAPABILITIES, COMPUTER HACKED

4. DOCUMENTS AND FILES CONSTANTLY ALTERED, MODIFIED, DELETED, AND/OR

5. FORCED TO ADD ANOTHER LOCKED CLOSET

LITIGATION AND COURT CASES

5. Stan J. Caterbone is currently the AMICUS for Former ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

I) CI-16-08472 in CATERBONE v. LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, et.al., an INJUNCTION

To: PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATORS

PHYSICAL PAIN, TORTURE, AND CRIPPLING

I) The following is from Case No. CI-16-08472 in CATERBONE v. LANCASTER GENERAL

THE FOLLOWING MEDICAL DEVICES WERE USED AND/OR INSTALLED

1. Walking is so difficult that on most days after 50 or so steps resting is vital

SOCIAL AND PUBLIC ACCESS

1. Yorgos Restaurant and Bar

THE ABOVE RESULTED IN THE FOLLOWING:

1. 4 HOUR EMERGENCY HOSPITAL VISIT TO LANCASTER REGIONAL

DATED: MAY 4, 2017

ACTIVE COURT CASESACTIVE COURT CASES

STAN J CATERBONE & ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

7 SOCIAL MEDIA SITES

23 NEW LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS, March 13, 2017

84 INTERNET LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS, February 14, 2014

STAN J. CATERBONE & ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

1. STAN J. CATERBONE'S WEBSITE www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

2. STAN J. CATERBONE'S YOUTUBE CHANNEL -

3. STAN J. CATERBONE'S TWITTER PAGE - https://twitter.com/SCaterbone

4. STAN J. CATERBONE'S SCRIBD PAGE FOR DOCUMENTS -

5. STAN J. CATERBONE'S LINKDIN PAGE - https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?

6. STAN J. CATERBONE'S AUDIO RECORDINGS ON YOURLISTEN.COM

7. STAN J. CATERBONE'S AUDIO RECORDINGS ON SOUNDCLOUD -

23 NEW LINKS OF EVIDENCE FOR ALL CLAIMS

17. LETTER to HIGH INDUSTRIES re MARRIOTT BAR THREATS, HARASSMENT, THEFT OF

22. 02101-NT-000214-2016 ORDER BY LANCASTER COUNTY COMMON PLEAS JUDGE MERRIS

24. NOTARIZED ENOUGH IS ENOUGH DECLARATION BY STAN J. CATERBONE MARCH 5, 2017

25. LETTER TO MATHEW HAVERSTICK, ATTORNEY FOR SCOTT MARTIN re MARTINE v.

28. STAN J. CATERBONE LETTER TO PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATORS re ANTI-STALKING

30. NOTORIZED DECLARATION TITLED ENOUGH IS ENOUGH BY STAN J. CATERBONE ON

31. LETTER TO TARGETED INDIVIDUAL ABBE EDISON OF PITTSBURG, PA re ADVISE ON

33. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE COMPLAINT No. 055746172-0101 re GEICO

35. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE COMPLAINT No. 055746172-0101 re GEICO

37. STAN J. CATERBONE LETTER TO PENNSYLVANIA STATE LEGISLATORS re ANTI-STALKING

3. WHISTLEBLOWERS KAREN STEWART AND STAN CATERBONE A Candid Discussion of

4.The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking Program

7. Legal Implications of the Soviet Microwave Bombardment of the U.S. Embassy

THE COMPUTER HACKER WANTS THIS FREE SPACE

ANTI-TRUST LINKS OF EVIDENCE

15. B2B Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16, 2017

INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY FALSE IMPRISONMENTS

23. FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence Agencies

28. Robert Gates

9 6 1 (( @ 8 1 #' (-3(+.( & 6"! & !"