Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://scp.sagepub.com
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
Additional services and information for Social Compass can be found at:
Subscriptions: http://scp.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations http://scp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/55/3/264
Reginaldo PRANDI
Religions and Cultures: Religious
Dynamics in Latin America
The author seeks to analyse the relationships between religion and culture
in Latin America, especially in Brazil, highlighting the fact that the different
religions enjoy diverse relationships with culture in a single location. He also
addresses the fact that religions interpret culture in different ways and these
interpretations help define their conversion strategies and how best to confront
opposing religions. For the sake of discussion, the author considers, hypotheti-
cally, a not-so-distant future in which Latin America becomes predominantly
evangelical, and asks what will happen to Latin Americas supposed Catholic
culture if the evangelical religions do indeed take over.
The relations between religions and cultures bring to mind a variety of issues
and approaches. It is my intention in this article to point out recent trends in
religion, and show that each religion has its own distinct relationship with
culture, and that the nature of these varying relationships has a direct bearing on
the dynamic of todays religions in terms of their growth, stagnation or decline.1
Although the immediate reference is Brazil, it would seem that much of what
happens in that nation can also be observed in other Latin American countries,
DOI: 10.1177/0037768608093689
http://scp.sagepub.com 2008 Social Compass
Sociologists perceive that religion, especially the kind that can be classified as
internalized (Camargo, 1971; Pierucci and Prandi, 1996), provides worldview,
changes peoples habits, internalizes values, and generally provides guidelines
for behaviour. Anthropologists teach us that culture consists of a process by
which humans organize and give meaning to their actions through symbolic
manipulations which are the basic attributes of all human endeavour, in the
words of Eunice Durham (2004: 231). It is standard practice to assert that reli-
gion not only constitutes culture but also provides culture with normative and
axiological components. And culture, on the other hand, interferes with religion,
reinforcing it or forcing it to change and adapt. Even though such definitions
can be questioned in light of a contemporary conceptual crisis, religion and
culture still refer to one another, especially when it comes to notions of nation,
country and region.
It is widely stated that Latin American culture is Catholic, although such a
statement must take into consideration the internal variations caused by historic
factors that are unique to each different country and region. An example of
such variations can be seen in the African Catholic syncretism that takes place
in some regions, including, primarily, in Brazil. In these countries, religions
with African roots occupy a relevant space, even more than belief systems
grounded in indigenous influences; in countries which have a smaller, or even
non-existent African influence in their Catholic structures, one can normally see
a larger indigenous influence than is seen in Brazil. Overall, we also know that
culture changes, and the formation of a global culture shapes local trends.
Nowadays, with the advance of the evangelical churches and the decline of
Catholicism, the debate about religion and culture has raised important ques-
tions, such as the one we have already motioned: might a Latin America that
is mostly evangelicalif indeed such a change were to take placebecome
culturally evangelical? Would this lead to an obliteration of African Brazil-
ian influences, an obliteration which is espoused by todays evangelicals?
These questions belong to a game of fortune-telling, and yet they call for
reflection. After all, culture and religion are intertwined, to the point of merg-
ingas has happened in the past and continues to happenin a variety of situ-
ations and societies. And they can also, at least conceptually, lead to different
definitions.
The tendency to draw up multiple approaches to the interpretation of religion
and culture is not unique to social scientists, who concern themselves with
theories and with producing meanings behind social reality. There are also pro-
found differences in the way that religionsand their thinkersperceive culture
and define themselves as institutions, producing specific placement strategies
II
The climate of unrest of the 1960s radically called into question the inherent
notion that culture is unchangeable and homogenous. The illusion (more than
the reality) of fixed and cohesive cultures disintegrated, as did the idea of a
fixed identity at birth notes Adam Kuper (2002: 26372). Added to this is the
dissolution of previously established religious affiliation.
One nation one culture, one culture one nation is a thing of the past, and
precedes the fall of the colonial era. Nowadays, when someone talks about cul-
ture the first image that comes to mind is of global culture, without barriers
cultural globalization. This all-encompassing culture is characterized by the
III
If we are going to think about a culture we must first take into consideration
the group of people who are taking part in it, using it to orient their actions, and
manipulating and transforming its symbols. If, in the case of religion, its values
and norms are of greatest interest to us, we must acknowledge that they only
make sense in terms of the real behaviour of individuals, and they cannot be dis-
sociated from the actions they orient, which in turn constitute cultural standards,
which are both historical and concrete. One cannot lose sight of the fact that
there is a permanent and accelerated process of cultural redefinition in todays
society and individuals. Institutions and the marketplace itself are all aware of
this to varying degrees, and they not only want to make the most of this situa-
tion, but they also want to interfere in this process.
The opposite to this would be thinking of culture in terms of a container,
a common concept in the field of comparative education, which employs a model
that defines and differentiates culture in opposition to the other (Lambeck and
Boddy, 1997), like two characters having a conversation. This allows treating
it with a concrete objectivity that it doesnt in fact have, as if individuals lived
inside culture, and culture contained individuals, isolating them and setting
limits on human behaviour and human understanding (Hoffman, 1999). The
container can be transformed from the outside, affecting the individuals con-
tained in it. But culture isnt an isolated, sealed compartmentindeed, is less so
every day. There are of course various grades of culture, with varying degrees
of commonalities. More than ever, individuals who belong to a specific culture
are in permanent contact with others who have their own cultures, and they
become integrated with one another in a globalizing culture, without frontiers,
in which different sources and references cross over and substitute for each
And he concludes:
Therefore, inculturization always implies and connotes a relationship between faith and the
culture(s), realities that encompass the totality of life and the human being, on an individual
and community level. (ibid.)
Along the same lines, Catholic theologian Faustino Teixeira states that incul-
turization always implies a reinterpretation of creation, the shock of contact
with creation and that successful inculturization is heavily dependent on a
deep knowledge of the culture with which Christianity is establishing relations
(Teixeira, 2007). Evidently, this course of action in or with a specific culture
focuses on identifying the specific cultures, the national, regional, local vari-
ants, the group, class and social categories in order to invest the evangelizing act
with a grain of scientific truth borrowed from an archaic form of anthropology
that reifies the concept of culture and perceives it as the bearer of individuals.
Meanwhile, Pentecostal and Neopentecostal Protestantisms soldier on, con-
quering more and more followers in this Catholic Latin America, converting
them one by one, without ever concerning themselves with the evangelization
of the culture. Their strategy consists of bringing new followers into the Church,
converting them one by one, building more and more temples, because they
know that the chicken fills its stomach one kernel at a time. They take from the
culture a few elements to be used in their favoursymbols, references, images,
and blessings, as well as small sympathetic magical elements the conversion
candidate is already comfortable with.
The recent history of Pentecostalism in Brazil shows that its expansion
strategy begins with the individual, the small, the crumb, and grows slowly and
steadily, before finally revealing itself and claiming its place and demanding
recognition within a culture. The emblematic Universal Church of the Kingdom
of God (Igreja Universal do Reino de Deus) started off in abandoned ware-
houses, bankrupt cinemas and other derelict buildings. Eventually, the day
arrived when its founder announced that the time had come to build cathedrals.
And the cathedrals of this Churchsymbols of the Churchs process of insti-
tutionalization and its inclusion into Brazilian culturehave slowly crept into
the urban scenery of the largest Catholic country on the planet. Similarly, large
mosques have spread throughout Europes capital cities, including in Rome,
revealing the unquestionable presence of an Islam planted by immigrants who
for decades prayed in the shadows.
Antnio Flvio Pieruccis prescient words outline the noticeable difference
between Catholicism and the evangelical religions with regards to culture.
See for yourself if any one of the churches that specializes in purely individual conversion,
such as the evangelical churches, with a view to addressing the challenges of our time,
is going to waste any time with the re-evangelization of a culture! And yet these are the
churches that most grow in these Catholic nations that stretch out from north to south
in Catholic America, as they rapidly reach in protestant America the new Spanish or
Brazilian immigrants, who are indeed culturally Catholic but are available for a potential
evangelical conversionthis departure does not cease to multiply itself, undermining from
within and from under the culturally Catholic peoples that Pope John Paul IIs pastoral
discourse tirelessly contemplated, with large doses of vanity, while he looked out from his
murky Polish rearview mirror. (Pierucci, 2005)
Furthermore, if one looks back nostalgically, one can see that the Catholic
Church has turned its back on the cultural changes that take place with regard
to important parts of the population, if not the entire population. By doing this,
it loses touch with reality, and shows itself up as old-fashioned, intransigent,
and incapable of keeping abreast of modern times and serving as the compass
and voice of the times (an image which was exactly what the Second Vatican
Council tried to avoid). Culturally active and up-to-date segments of society
see the Catholic Church as an enemy, as being against all the things that they
consider the decisive factors of the socio-cultural change that they have already
attained and are yet to attain, free of religious mediation.
Catholic ways of thinking become in the end self-exclusive, as they fail to
keep abreast of the cultural changes made by the Catholic flock itself. Contem-
porary culture is in constant transformation, is increasingly secularized, and
offers multiple meanings for a world that seeks new answers and new solutions,
and creates previously unimagined needs, every day. Catholic ways of think-
ing attribute Catholic losses (such as followers, prestige and influence) to the
growing wear and tear of a new culture that undermines faith, corrodes Christian
values and replaces traditional religious orientation by scientific, philosophical
and political secular orientations available to everyone. The Catholic Church
must intervene in the new culture and restore the original culture, the culture of
the roots, of the formation of our society.
Nowadays, on the one hand, the Catholic Church, under the retrograde
command of Pope Benedict XVI, seeks to reestablish a doctrinaire and ritual
unity made relevant and culturally differentiated by the reforms of the Second
Vatican Council in terms of wanting to bring the Church closer to the worlds
transformations. The evangelical Churches, on the other hand, continue their
obsessive quest to multiply, diversify and invent new approachesto sacred
things and to convertsand dedicate themselves to developing new conversion
and persuasion techniques. They proclaim themselves to be the new path, they
change peoples concepts of money and of material goods, they try to solve
all sorts of personal problems, and create a supply of religious (and magical)
services previously unimagined over the course of Protestantism in its road to
disenchantment. In the end, they modify the relationship between God and man.
And they fill their Churches with new followers. But they want more. They also
want visibility, social recognition, and they want to be accepted as legitimate
members of contemporary culture.
IV
It would be impossible to list the large number of Catholic symbols and ele-
ments that are represented in Latin American culture in its different manifes-
tations. Proud Brazilians recently voted en masse to include the Christ the
Redeemer (Cristo Redentor) statue in Rio de Janeiro on the new list of the seven
wonders of the world, and their voice was heard. Were they fervent Catholics,
these Brazilians fighting for Christ the Redeemer to make it onto the list? They
were most probably ordinary Brazilians, lacking a specific religious affilia-
tion, who voted for a scenic monument, a tourist attraction that is as secular as
Copacabana beach or the Sugarloaf Mountain in Rio. The same statue appeared
in the electoral campaigns created by the government and the private sector
in exactly the same context. One can say the same thing about the countrys
colonial baroque churches and the modernist cathedral in Brasilia, and about
so many other buildings and elements of Brazils material heritage erected by
Catholics; the countrys immaterial heritage is also replete with festivals and
annual events, originally religious, that have been secularized by society. All
these things are Catholic and yet at the same time they are not. They are cultur-
ally Catholic, but not religiously so.
In Brazils case, and in the case of some other Latin American countries, one
cannot discuss culture without taking into consideration the presence of African
elements. In Brazil, some aspects of African influence go further back, such as
language, and can be traced back to slavery. Others are more recent and emanate
from the African Brazilian religions, which date to the first half of the 19th
century. African Brazilian religious influence is felt in popular music, in litera-
ture, poetry and theatre, cinema and television, in the arts, cooking, carnival and
NOTE
1.
This text reproduces, with minor changes, my inaugural address at the XIV Jornadas
Sobre Alternativas Religiosas na Amrica Latina, Buenos Aires, 25 to 28 September,
2007. My special thanks go to Mara Julia Carozzi and Alejandro Frigerio and other
members of the organizing committee for the distinctive honour of opening Jornadas in
2007. I would also like to thank Antnio Flvio Pierucci for critiques and suggestions
on this text.
REFERENCES