You are on page 1of 99

CE 412

Structural Analysis and Design Sessional-II

Department of Civil Engineering


Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology
Version 1; November, 2015
AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Preface

This lab handout is intended to give an overview of a Multi storied Building and a
Balanced Cantilever Bridge structural analysis and design. It concentrates on the gravity loading
only. This handout provides a basic guideline for analysis, design and detailing works as well as
reviewing a standard code of practice. To provide the undergraduate students a well-organized,
user-friendly, and easy-to-follow resource, this handout is divided into two major parts. The first
part mainly focuses on the structural analysis and design of Reinforced concrete (RC)
Multistoried Building that includes design of Slab, Beam, Column, Stair, Water reservoir and
Lateral load analysis. The other part deals with the Balanced Cantilever Bridge including an
introduction to Bridge Engineering, details about Balanced Cantilever Bridge, design of Deck
Slab, design of Railing, Post and Curb/Sidewalk, design of Interior Girder considering dead and
live loads only, design of Exterior Girder considering dead and live loads only, design of
Diaphram or Cross Girder and Design of Articulation. Handouts of Dr. Khan Mahmud Amanat,
and Mr. Ruhul Amin, of BUET were helpful as well as suggestions from some faculty members
of the Department of Civil Engineering, AUST.

Zasiah Tafheem
Shafiqul Islam

Department of Civil Engineering


Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology

Page | 2

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

INDEX

Part I
Structural Analysis and Design of the Multistoried RC building

Sl. No. Name Page no.

1 Introduction 5

2 Design of Stair 10

3 Design of Overhead Water Reservoir (OWR) 14

4 Lateral Load Calculation 23

5 Design of Slab 27

6 Design of Beam only for Gravity Load 31

7 Design of Column 38

8 References 45

Page | 3

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Part II:
Preliminary Design of the Superstructure of a Balanced Cantilever
Bridge for Gravity loading

Sl. Name Page No.


No.

1 Introduction to Bridge Engineering 49


2 About Balanced Cantilever Bridge 60
3 Design of Deck Slab 69
4 Design of Railing, Post and Sidewalk 71
5 Design of Interior Girder 74
6 Design of Exterior Girder 90
7 Design of Cross Girder/ Diaphram 92
8 Design of Articulation 93
9 References 99

Page | 4

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Part I:Structural Analysis and Design of the Multistoried building

Introduction
Generally the design of any structure (building, bridge etc) can be dividing in two segments,

Foundation design (footing, basement, retaining wall, abutment, underground water


reservoir etc)

Design of superstructure (beam, column, slab, girder, stair etc)

Figure 1: Super structural elements

Page | 5

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 2: Foundation elements

Page | 6

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 3: Gravity load distribution

Page | 7

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Foundation design: it can also be dividing in two parts,

Determination of soil load bearing capacity, soil stability and the lateral forces introduce
by soil.

The structural design of the elements beneath GL.

# Note: the B.C. of soil and the other parameters like atterberg limit, angle of internal friction,
consolidation can be taken direct from soil report but a general cross check between the relations
among the parameters are required.

Steps of design

Specified the type of structural system like RCC or Steel or Composite, beam supported
or flat plate or braced etc.

Specified the loads considering the type of services like residential or commercial or
institutional etc based on associate codes and judgments.

Prepare a preliminary model of the structure with preliminary sections based on the
judgment.

Analysis the model for desired load combinations according to BNBC in the context of
Bangladesh,

I. DL+LL

II. 1.4DL+1.7LL

III. 0.75[1.4DL+1.7LL1.7{1.1(EQx or EQy)}] ~ 1.05DL+1.275LL+1.4(EQx or EQy)

IV. 0.75{1.4DL+1.7LL1.7(Wx or Wy)} ~ 1.05DL+1.275LL+1.275(Wx or Wy)

Design the structural elements separately by considering their integrity and construction
feasibility of that design.

Page | 8

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Design Criteria
U.S.D Method W.S.D Method
c' = Cylindrical strength of concrete
c' = Cylindrical strength of concrete
c =0.45 c'
y = Yield strength of reinforcement

Vc =Allowable shear force without web


y = Yield strength of reinforcement

Ec =w1.5 33 c'
reinforcement = 2
c w
b d
Es 29x10 6
n= Er
= 145 15 x33 fc
V = Allowable shear force with web
n
k =(n+r)
reinforcement = 8
c w
b d
j = 1- k/3
V =Allowable peripherial shear force in slab
and footing without web reinforcement 1
R =2 fckj

vc =Allowable shear stress without web


=4
c w
bd
reinforcement =1.1 c
Strength reduction factors : v= Allowable shear stress without web
# Flexure, without axial load = 0.90 reinforcement =5 c

# Axial compression and axial compression Vc =Allowable peripherial shear stress in


with flexure: slab and footing without web reinforcement
=2 c
Members with spiral Reinforcement = 0.75

Other reinforcement = 0.70

# Shear and torsion = 0.85

# Bearing on concrete = 0.75

Page | 9

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Design of Stair

Figure 4: Typical stair

Live Load= 100 psf = 0.1 ksf

Dead load Calculation:


1 6 10
3.59150
2 12 12
Rises & Steps= 1000
= 0.98 k

6 6
7.52 +4.52 3.5150 8.75 3.5150
Waist= 12
= 12
=2.3 k
1000 1000

Total Dead Load=Landing slab + (Rises & Steps+ Waist)


6
150 0.98+2.3
12
= + =0.2 ksf
1000 3.58.75

Floor Finish= 25 psf = 0.025 ksf

Total load, W= (0.1*1.6) + [1.2*(0.2 +0.025)] =0.43ksf


Page | 10

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

0.43 23.5+8.75
+ = = =7.6 k-ft/ft
14

0.43 15.75 2
= = =11.85 k-ft/ft
9

d= (t-1) = (6-1) = 5"

fy= 60000 psi


f'c= 3000 psi
. 3000 0.003
= . .+ = 0.85 0.85 60000 0.003 +0.004 = 0.015

pmax fy
Mu = pmax fy b d2 1 0.59
fc
11.8512 142 .2
d2 = 0.015 60 = =17.8
0.90.015 6012 10.59 8
3

d = 4.21"< provided, 5" (ok)

Table 1: Minimum ratios of temperature and shrinkage reinforcement in slabs based on gross
concrete area. (Ref: ACI Code, Design of Concrete Structure, 13th edition, Chap-13, P-417)

= . = 0.0018 12 6 = 0.129in.2
7.612
+ = = 0.7 = 0.37in.2 (controlled)
0.960 5
2

0.3760
= = = 0.7(ok)
. .85312

0.1612
Now, = 5.2"; use 12mm@5" c/c alt ckd
0.37

Again,
Page | 11

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

11.8512
= = 1 =0.58in.2 (controlled)
0.960 5
2

0.560
= = = 1.1(ok)
. .85312

The distance between two cranked rod is 10".


0.1612
So, Required reinforcement = 0.58- =0.39in.2
10

0.39 10
The extra negative reinforcement required, 0.16 * 12 = 2. So, use 2-12mmas extra top.

For shrinkage, Asmin = 0.0018 12 6 = 0.129in.2


0.121 12
Now, 0.129
= 11.23"; use10mm@10" c/c

Stair Beam

Assume beam size, 10"x12"

d= (t-1) = (12-2.5) = 9.5"

So, self weight = .83*1*150= 0.12k/ft


0.5 15.753.50.2 2 +0.5 15.753.50.1 2
Load on Stair beam = + 0.42*10*0.12 + 0.12 = 2.7 k/ft
8

2.7 8
+ = = =12.3 k-ft
14

2.7 82
= = =10.8 k-ft
16

. 3000 0.003
= . .+ = 0.85 0.85 60000 0.003 +0.004 = 0.015

pmax fy
Mu = pmax fy b d2 1 0.59
fc
12.312
d2 = 0.015 60 = 18.45
0.90.015 6012 10.59
3

d = 4.3" < provided, 5" (ok)



Asmin= bd = 0.32 in2

12 .312
+ = = 0.7 = 0.3 in.2
0.960 9.5
2
Page | 12

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

0.360
= = = 0.7(ok)
. .85312

So, use 2-16mm st at top and bottom.

Figure 5: Reinforcement Details of stair.

Page | 13

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Design of OWR

Figure 6: Roof top water reservoir

Given Data:
f'c= 3000 psi
fy= 60000 psi

Size of a water Reservoir:

6th floor building of 2 units& 5 members in each unit.


[Water consuming 210 per capita per day]

Page | 14

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Total members= 6*2*5= 60 persons.


Total water consuming= 60*210= 12600 litters for a full day.
12600
= m3 = 12.6*3.283 = 445ft 3
1000

Inner length & width of Reservoir is,


Length=14.5 ft
width=7.5 ft
445
so, Height=7.514.5 =4.09 ft+1 ft=5.09 ft~ 6 ft ; [where, free Board= 1 ft]
Height= 6 ft

Figure 7: Pressure distribution on reservoir wall

For Vertical Reinforcement:

Let wall thickness = 5"


so, Effective depth, d= 5-1 = 4"
. 3000 0.003
= . .+ = 0.85 0.85 60000 0.003 +0.004 = 0.015

pmax fy
Mu = pmax fy b d2 1 0.59
fc
2.2512 27
d2 = 0.015 60 = =3.8
0.90.015 6012 10.59 8
3

Page | 15

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

d = 1.84"< provided, 4" (ok)

= . = 0.0018 12 5 = 0.12 in2 /ft

[Let, a=0.25]
2.2512
= = .25 = 0.13 in2 /ft(controlled)
.9050 4
2

0.1360
= = = 0.26(ok)
. .85312

use, 10mm@8in c/c.

For Horizontal Reinforcement:


. . 14.5 14.5
= ( + ) = 62.5 * 6* ( + ) = 5438 lb
2 2

Again,
force 5438 5438
= = 60000 =0.09 in2 /ft
stress fy

Use 10 @ 8in c/c

Slab Load Distribution:

Bottom slab:

Table 2: Minimum thickness of nonprestressed one-way slabs. (Ref: ACI Code, Design of
Concrete Structure, 13th edition, Chap-13, P-416)

7.5
Thickness= 20 12 = 4.5 in

Page | 16

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

4.5
1 150
Self weight of slab =. 12
= 0.067ksf
1000

5wA l4A 5wB l4B


=
384 EI 384 EI

wA l4A = wB l4B
4
lB
wA = wB
lA

Wa =16* Wb

Wa +Wb = 0.067 ksf

Wb = .004k/ft

Wa = .064k/ft

Floor Finish= 25 psf = 0.025 ksf

Total load, W= (0.0625*1.6) + [1.2*(0.064 +0.025)] =0.21ksf

Moment for short Direction

0.217.5
+ = = = 0.84 k-ft/ft
14

0.217.52
= = = 0.5 k-ft/ft
9

. 3000 0.003
= . = 0.85 0.85 = 0.015
.+ 60000 0.003 +0.004

pmax fy
Mu = pmax fy b d2 1 0.59
fc
0.8412 10
d2 = 0.015 60 = 8 =1.25
0.90.015 6012 10.59
3

d = 1.11" < provided, 3.5" (ok)

= . = 0.002 12 4.5 = 0.11in2 /ft

Page | 17

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

0.8412
+ = = 0.1 = 0.05in.2
0.960 3.5
2

0.0560
= = = 0.1(ok)
. .85312

So, all the reinforcement will be controlled by As min.

Use 10mm @ 8 in c/c ckd and 1-10mm as extratop.

Top Slab:

For top slab there is no water load and some life load which is negligible. As the bottom slab is
controlled by 4.5" thickness and Asmin, so will be the top slab.

Figure 8: Reinforcement details of top slab overhead water reservoir

Page | 18

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Beam Design:

Here, Load from Bottom Slab= 0.21ksf

Beam Thickness, t=12 in

Effective Depth, d=(12-2.5)=9.5 in

Self weight = .83*1*150= 0.12k/ft

Figure 9: Load distribution of slab

Moment for
1
7.53.5 0.21
Triangular portion=2 + 0.12 + .42 6 0.15 = 0.86k/ft
7.5

1
14.5+7.5 3.750.21
Trapezoidal portion= 2
+ 0.12 + .42 6 0.15 =1.1k/ft
14 .5

Page | 19

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Table 3: Moment and shear values using ACI coefficients. (Ref: ACI Code, Design of Concrete
Structure, 13th edition, Chap-12, P-395)

Page | 20

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 10: Moment coefficients for beam.

1.114.5
+ = = =16.5 k-ft
14

1.114.5
= = =14.5 k-ft
16

pmax fy
Mu = pmax fy b d2 1 0.59
fc

=1.44in< 9.5 in Provided. (Ok)


M12 16 .512
+As = a = 1 = 0.41in2
fy d 0.960 d
2 2

As fy
Where, a = =0.95in (Ok)
.85fc b

200 200 109.5


Now, Asmin= fy bd = = 0.32 in2(Ok)
60000

Use 2-16mmst at top and bottom.


Page | 21

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 11: Reinforcement details of roof top water reservoir beam

Page | 22

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 12: Reinforcement details of roof top water reservoir

Lateral Load Calculation


Earthquake Load Calculation:

Here,

Seismic Zone-coefficient, Z=0.15 [Dhaka] 40.575 ft

Structural Importance Coefficient, I=1


[Residential]

Response Modification Coefficient, R=9


47.875 ft
1.25S
Now, Numerical Co-efficient, C= 2 = 2.21 Figure 13: Plan of the building
T3

Page | 23

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

s2 =1.2
50
T=Ct*(hn)3/4=0.073*(3.28 ) 3/4=0.5650.75;

1.25 12
C= 2 = 2.21
(0.56)3
1
W= DL* Area* Storied= 175*47.875*40.575*5*1000 =1699.7 k~1700 k

Z I C W 0.15 1 2.21 1700


V= = = 62.6 kip
R 9
1 1
Wi = DL*Area*1000 = 175*47.875*40.575*1000 = = 339.9 k~ 440 k

Wi hi = 440*(10+20+30+40+50) =60000

Here, Ft=0 as, T<0.75


VF t W i h x
Load on each floor, Fx= W i h i
(62.60)440 h x
Fx= = 0.417 hx
60000

Table 4: Equivalent earth quake forces at different levels.

Floor hx Force, Fx=0.417 * hx

Ground Floor 10 ft 4.17


1st 20 ft 8.34
2nd 30 ft 12.51
3rd 40 ft 16.68
4th 50 ft 20.85+ Ft = 20.85

Wind Load Calculation:

Page | 24

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

40.575 ft

5@10= 50 ft
B= 47.875
ft

(a) (b)

Figure 14: a) Plan b) Elevation of the building

Here,
Gust Co-efficient, CG = 1.43
Cc = 47.2 106

B= 46.43
L= 39.88
Heght, h= 50

Now,
Important Co efficient, CI = 1.00; for Office Building.
Combined height & , Cz = Table 6.2.15
km
Wind Velocity= 210 (Dhaka)
hr
qz = CC CI Cz Vb 2 = 2.08 Cz

Table 5: Overall pressure coefficients, Cp for rectangular building with flat roof. (Ref: BNBC
1993)
Page | 25

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Here,
L
= 0.85;
B
h
= 1.04;
B
Cp = 1.49
Pz = CG Cp qz = 4.43 *Cz

Table 6: Equivalent wind forces at different floor levels.


Height (m) Cz qz kn Fz = Pz *A (KN) Fz (KN) F (K)
pz = ( )
m2
3.048 0.368 0.76544 1.63 1.63*3.0478*4.33 21.51 1.80
6.096 0.415 0.8632 1.84 1.84*3.0478*4.33 24.28 5.42
9.144 0.498 1.03584 2.21 2.21*3.0478*4.33 29.17 6.51
12.192 0.57 1.1856 2.53 2.53*3.0478*4.33 33.39 7.45
15.24 0.63 1.3104 2.79 3.0478 18.41 4.109
2.79* *4.33
2

Design of Slab

Page | 26

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 15: Typical floor plan


(0.8+ )
200000
Thickness, t = 36+9

Considering the largest two panels of 22'-10"x13'-2" and 22'-10"x11'-6". As the longest
dimension among both of them are same the thickness will depend on .
22.83
So, = 13.17 = 1.73

Thickness, t =5.63 in. 5.5 in.

Load:

Page | 27

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Self weight of slab =


Floor finish= 30 psf
Partition wall= 40 psf
Live Load = 40 psf

Total, W = (174+64) = 231psf

fc=3000 psi
fy= 60000 psi

m= = 0.58 ~ 0.6 and case 4

m= = 0.5and case 9

Table 7: Moment coefficients for two-way slabs. (Ref : BNBC 1993)

Conditions Case 4 Case 9

- CA 0.089 0.088

-CB 0.011 0.003

+CA(DL) 0.053 0.038

+CB(DL) 0.007 0.002

+CA(LL) 0.067 0.067

+CB(LL) 0.009 0.004

For, case 4
Short distance A, +M= { =
short distance A, -M = { *W* =

For, case 9
Short distance A, +M= { =
short distance A, -M = { *W* =
Page | 28

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

So, in short direction M = and +M=

= 0.132

= 0.11

(ok)

Now, lt ckd

Again,

= 0.18 (controlled)

(ok)

The distance between two cranked rod is 16".

So, Required reinforcement = 0.18 - =0.09

The extra negative reinforcement required, * =1. So use 1- as extra top.

By observing the moment coefficients it can be said that, all the reinforcement in long direction
will be controlled by Asmin.

So, the reinforcement will be lt ckd and 1- as extra top.

Page | 29

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 16: Reinforcement Details of Slab

Page | 30

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Design of Beam Only for Gravity Load


1
2
3
1

4
1

A C E
Figure 17: Beam layout

Load on slab, W = 231psf


and,
fc=3000 psi
fy= 60000 psi

= = 0.016

Page | 31

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Beam in-between A and B grid on grid 2

Trapezoidal panel:

= = *(22.92 +11.42)*5.75 = 98.73

= = *(18.29 +4.08)*7.105 = 79.4

Load on bam:
Let, Depth, h = 18''

Self weight= * = 0.187 kip/ft *1.2 = 0.22 kip/ft

Load from Slab = + = 1+1 = 2 kip/ft

Partition wall on beam = 0.42* 9* 120 = 0.45 * 1.2= 0.54 k/ft

Total load = 0.022 + 2 +0.54 = 2.57 kip/ft

Page | 32

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 18: Moment coefficient for slab and beam.

At grid 2-A joint

-M= = = 54 kip-ft

At grid 2-B joint

-M= = = 86 kip-ft

At mid span

+M= = = 62 kip-ft

As we always provide reinforcement at both top and bottom of a beam section, a designer could
consider the beam always as double reinforcement for economy.

Assume fs' = fy, 2-16mm at compression zone and two later of reinforcement,

so d - d= 18 - 2.5 2 = 13.5'',
Page | 33

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Mn = As' fs' (d - d') = 0.9*(2*0.31)*60*(13.5-2.5)/12 = 31 k-ft

So Mu(concrete) = 86 31 = 55 k-ft

d = 9.6'' < 13.5" (Ok)

-As(at 2-B joint) = = 1 in

a= 2.4 (ok)

min = 200/fy = .003

= = = 0.012> min and < 0.016 (max). So ok

Use 2-20mm or 1-20mm and 2-16mm as extra top.

-As(at 2-A joint) = = 0.4 in

a= 1 (ok)
Use 1-20mm as extra top.

At mid span
Assuming stress block depth (a) equal to flange thickness hf and two layer of reinforcement.

d = 18-2.5-2=13.5".

+As = = 0.64 in

a= 1.5 < 5.5, so rectangular beam.

+As = = 0.55 in

a= 1.2 (ok)

use 2-16mm as extra bottom.


Page | 34

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

If it was a T beam then,

Effective flange width

i) One fourth of the beam span = = 5.73' ~ 69"

ii) Stem width plus 8 times the slab thickness on both side = b w + (8*2)hf = 10" + 16*5.5" = 98"

iii) Steam width plus a flange overhang not greater than half of the clear distance to the next
beam = 10" + + = 155"

so, effective flange width, b = 69".

Asf =

Mn1 = *Asf*fy*(d - hf/2)

Mn2 = Mu - Mn1

As - Asf = ;a=

As = Asf + (As Asf)

N.A. c = > hf (T beam checked)

Shear Design:

Vu =0 .5WL=18.3k
*Va = 2* b*d = 2*0.85 10*19.5 = 18.16 kip

Use 10mm as shear reinforcement.

Smax = = = 29 in

Smax = = = 6.5 in (Govern)

Smax = 24"

S= = = 833 in

Page | 35

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

So provide 10mm @ 6.5" c/c although the beam.

Beam in-between B and D grid on grid 2

Load on bam:

For UDL,
Depth, h = 18'', as it is the continuation of previous beam.

Self weight= * = 0.187 kip/ft *1.2 = 0.22 kip/ft

Load from Slab = + = 1 + 3.38 = 4.38 kip/ft

Partition wall on beam = 0.42* 9* 120 = 0.45 * 1.2= 0.54 k/ft

Total load = 0.022 + 4.38 +0.54 = 4.94 kip/ft

At grid 2-B and 2-D joint

-M= = = 38 kip-ft

At mid span

+M= = = 26 kip-ft

For point load

= = *11.5*5.75 = 33.06

Point load from Slab = = 3.8 kip

Page | 36

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

M= = = 4.4 kip-ft

So finally

- M =38 + 4.4= 42.4 kip-ft

+ M= 26 + 4.4= 30.4kip-ft

By observing the values of


moment the negative moments at
supports will be controlled by the
continuation of adjacent beam. For
positive moment no extra
reinforcement other than the
continues reinforcement bars.

Figure 19: Moment co-efficient for single span beam

Figure 20: Reinforcement detail of beam

Page | 37

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Design of Column

Figure 21: Interaction diagram for compression plus biaxial bending a) uniaxial bending about
Y axis; b) uniaxial bending about X axis; c) biaxial bending about diagonal axis; d) interaction
surface. (Ref: ACI Code, Design of Concrete Structure, 13th edition, Chap-8, P-274)

Page | 38

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 22: Interaction diagram for nominal column strength in combined bending and axial load.
(Ref: ACI Code, Design of Concrete Structure, 13th edition, Chap-8, P-260)

Considering,

fy= 60000 psi


f'c=4000 psi

For a column,

P = 554 K

Mx = 85 K-ft

My = 120K-ft

For, tied column, due to accidental eccentricity strength reduction factor = 0.8 and

Page | 39

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Based on importance strength reduction factor = 0.65, (ACI Code, Design of Concrete
Structure, 13th edition, Chap-8, P-252)

let, g = 2%

Now, Pn = [0.85 fc*Ag + g *Ag*fy]

554 = 0.65*0.8[0.85*4*Ag+0.02*Ag*60]

Ag = 232 in2

Let, 18"x15"

For My or dimension parallal to X axis,

= dx/Dx = (18-2.5*2)/18 = 0.72~ 0.7

Eccentricity ex = My/p = 120/554 = 0.21' = 2.6"

ex/h = 2.6/18 = 0.14

From graph, K = 0.79

Py = 853 k

For My or dimension parallal to X axis,

= dy/Dy = 0.67 0.6

ey = 85/554 = 0.15' = 1.8"

ey/h = 1.8/15 = 0.12

From graph, K = 0.85

Px = 918

For Po,K = (1.1+1.12)/2 = 1.11

Page | 40

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Po = 1200

+ -

= +

Pn = 0.65*700 k =455k < 554 k (not ok)

As the difference between capacity and load is 20% so, size increment will be required. But
neglecting it continue the design.

So, column size 18"x15"and As = 0.02*18*15 = 5.4 in2. Use 12- .

Figure 23: Minimum spacing between reinforcement bars

Page | 41

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

The distance between reinforcement bars must be such to allow the largest expected concrete
size gravel to pass between them. In order to have properly anchored reinforcement, it is
mandatory for rebars to be surrounded by concrete.
The minimum spacing between two reinforcement bars should be at least equal to the maximum
coarse aggregate dimension plus a margin of 5 mm.

Tie bar

bars are used.

Longitudinal Spacing

16 dbof main bar = 16*20/25.4 = 12"

48 dbof tie bar = 48*10/25.4 = 18"

Least dimension = 15"

So, spacing at top and bottom 12/2 = 6" c/c and at middle span 12" c/c.

Figure 24: Failure mechanism of a column

A column with 10% fewer rebars has around 10% lower capacity strength. However, if we
remove even a single intermediate stirrup, the capacity strength of that same column will be
lowered even by 50%. This happens because the stirrups removal doubles the buckling length of
the rebars previously enclosed by it.

Page | 42

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Cross sectional Spacing

# the reinforcement at a distance greater than 6" from the outer most bar should be under a lateral
tie and

# Alternate bar should be under lateral tie.

Figure 25: Tie arrangement of rectangular column ((Ref: ACI Code, Design of Concrete
Structure, 13th edition, Chap-8, P-254)

Page | 43

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 26: Standard bar hook for tie and stirrup. (Ref: ACI Code, Design of Concrete Structure,
13th edition, Chap-5, P-177)

Figure 27: Typical column detail

Page | 44

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

References
Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC), 2006.

Concrete Technology by Nevill.

Design of Concrete Structure by Nilson (13th edition).

Design of RCC Members by WSD and USD Methods, Public Works Department (PWD),

1997.

Treasure of RCC Designs by Sushil Kumar (16th edition).

www.buildinghow.com

Page | 45

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Part II
Preliminary Design of the Superstructure of a Balanced Cantilever
Bridge for Gravity loading

Page | 46

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

LECTURE SCHEDULE

Lecture 1

Introduction to Bridge Engineering


About Balanced Cantilever Bridge
Design of Deck Slab

Lecture 2

Design of Railing, Post and Sidewalk


Design of Interior Girder

(Dead load Calculation, Shear force diagram, Bending Moment Diagram for dead load,
Influence line for shear & moment at different sections)

Lecture 3

Design of Interior Girder, Exterior Girder

(Shear force diagram, Bending Moment Diagram for live load including truck load and
Lane load at different sections, Corresponding Impact shear & moment, Design of
reinforcement for shear & moment)

Lecture 4

Design of Cross Girder/ Diaphram and Articulation

Page | 47

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

BRIDGE DESIGN SUBMISSION GUIDELINE


The Design Report shall explain the details of the design process. It shall include the
following items:
Design Specification, Standards followed in Analysis & Design
Loads and Load Combinations
Design of Slab
Design of Railing, Post and Sidewalk
Design of Interior Girder
Design of Exterior Girder
Design of Diaphrams or Cross Girders
Design of Articulation

[Note: Appropriate hand sketches showing the details of reinforcements must


accompany all design calculations.]

Table 8: Design Data For Students


Parameters For Odd Roll No. For Even Roll No.

fc / 3000 psi 3500 psi

fy 40 ksi 60 ksi

Lane Width 10 ft 13 ft

No. of lanes 3 2

No. of Longitudinal girders 5 4

Live load HS 15-44 HS 20-44

Total Span Length = Student Number + 120 ft


Wearing Surface + Protective Coating = 10 psf + 15 psf = 25 psf
Width of Sidewalk = 3.5 ft
Page | 48

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGE ENGINEERING

What is a Bridge?
A Bridge is a structure providing passage over an obstacle without closing the
way beneath.
The required passage may be for a road, a railway, pedestrians, a canal or a
pipeline.

Requirements of an Ideal Bridge


Economical
Serves the intended functions with safety and convenience
Aesthetic elegant look

Selection of Bridge Site


A straight reach of the river
Steady river flow without serious whirls and cross currents
A narrow channel with firm banks
Suitable high banks above high flood level on each side
Rock or other hard strata close to the river bed level
Absence of sharp curves in the approaches
Avoidance of excessive underwater construction
Avoidance of expensive river training work
Proximity to a direct alignment of the connected road

Page | 49

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Choice of a type of a Bridge


Channel Section
Sub-soil condition
Grades and Alignment
Hydraulic Data
Weather
Navigation requirements
Economic and Strategic considerations
Labour availability
Materials of Construction available
Period of Construction
Type of loading
Erection Facilities

Types of Bridge
Slab Bridge
Deck-girder Bridge
Balanced- Cantilever Bridge
Suspension Bridge
Cable-stayed Bridge
Arch Bridge

Page | 50

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 28: Deck-girder Bridge Niteroi Bridge, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil

Figure 29: Arch Bridge - Sydney Harbour Bridge, Australia

Page | 51

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 30: Cable-stayed Bridge Rion Antirion Bridge, Greece

Figure 31: Suspension Bridge Akashi Kaikyo Bridge, Japan

Page | 52

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Different Parts of a Bridge


Foundation: The portion below the bed level of a river.
Substructure: The parts below the bearings level and above the foundation.
Superstructure: Components above the level of bearings.

Components above the level of bearings

Superstructure

Substructure

Foundation

Figure 32: Different parts of a Bridge

Components of a Bridge
Deck Slab
Girder
Diaphram or Cross Girder
Bearings for the decking
Abutment, Wingwall
Pier, Viaduct
Foundation (i.e.Pile)
Handrail, Curb/ Sidewalk
Approach to the Bridge (to connect the bridge proper to the roads on either side)

Page | 53

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Softwares for Bridge Design


SAP 2000
CSiBridge
ADAPT ABI 2012
Structural Bridge Design
CRSI (Slab Bridge Designer)
ANSYS Civil FEM Bridge

Components of a Balanced Cantilever Bridge

Figure 32: Longitudinal Profile showing Different components

Page | 54

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

BRIDGE TERMINOLOGY
Abutment
The end supports of the superstructure of a bridge.
Supports the bridge deck at the ends.
Retains the approach road embankment.

Wing walls
The walls constructed on both sides of the abutments.
Anchor the bridge to its approach road.
Support the embankments of approach road.
Protect the embankments from the wave action of running water.

Figure 33: Transverse section

Curb/ Sidewalk
Raised portion of a roadway slab on both sides.
Provided to check the vehicle to fall out the bridge.
Width of 60cm & Height of 22.5 cm are adopted.
Roadside slope is kept as 1 in 8 upto 20cm & top portion is curved.

Page | 55

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Footpath
The passage where only pedestrians are allowed to walk.
Width may be taken as 1.5 to 2.2 metre.

Handrail
Protective measures adopted to prevent the falling to river of the bridge users.

Pier
Intermediate supports of the superstructure of a bridge.
Transfer load from the superstructure to the sub-soil through the foundation.
Obstruct the flow of water on the upstream.
Facilitate a long bridge to be converted into segments.

Figure 34: Afflux

Afflux
The rise in water level of the river near bridge due to obstruction created by
obstruction of piers.
Afflux = Difference of levels of downstream and upstream water surface of
bridge.

Page | 56

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Freeboard
The difference between the high flood level and the level of the crown of the road
at its lowest point.

Approaches/ Embankments
The structures that carry the road or railway track upto the bridge.

Approach Slab
The slab provided to join the approach road with the bridge. One end rests on the
backfill of the abutment and extends into the approach at least by 3.5m.

Backfill
Materials used to fill the space at the back of the bridge. They are the broken
stone, gravel, sand etc. and should be clean.

Figure 35: Total span, total clear span, span and clear span

Total Span & Total Clear Span

Page | 57

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

The centre to centre distance between the end supports of a bridge is termed as
total span. Clear distance between the end supports is termed as total clear
span.

Span & Clear Span


The centre to centre distance between any two adjacent supports is termed as
span. Clear distance between any two adjacent supports is termed as clear span.

Headroom
The distance between the highest point of the vehicle using that bridge and the
lowest point of any protruding member of the bridge.

High Flood Level (HFL)
The highest water level ever recorded during a flood in a river or stream.

Low Flood Level (LFL)


The lowest water level in a river or stream during dry weather

Mean or Ordinary Flood Level (MFL)


The flood level that normally occurs every year.

Loads on Bridge
Dead load
Live load (i.e. Vehicles and Pedestrians)
Dynamic or Impact effect of live load
Wind loading
Seismic Forces
Buoyancy
Water current forces

Page | 58

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Thermal Forces
Erection Forces
Earth Pressure
Centrifugal Forces (for curved deck)
Longitudinal Forces (for stopping vehicle)
Ice loading

AASHTO Live Load (Truck load)

Figure 36: Truck loading as per AASHTO 2002

Page | 59

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

ABOUT BALANCED CANTILEVER BRIDGE

What is a Balanced Cantilever Bridge?

A cantilever bridge is a bridge built using cantilevers, structures that project


horizontally into space, supported on only one end.
The suspended span is designed as a simply supported span with supports at
the articulations.
A simple cantilever span is formed by two cantilever arms extending from
opposite sides of an obstacle to be crossed.

Why Balanced Cantilever Bridge?

Page | 60

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 37: A bridge having simply supported span

Figure 38: A bridge having continuous span

Page | 61

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 39: A bridge having intermediate hinges

Advantages of Balanced Cantilever Bridge


Being a Determinate Structure.
The problem of large stress due to differential support settlement is eliminated
due to the internal hinges.
The design section becomes economic.
Less concrete, steel are required for cantilever design.

Disadvantages of Balanced Cantilever Bridge


Requires a little more skill on the part of the designer.
Requires more elaborate detailing of the reinforcements.
Articulations are very congested with steel and anchorages.
Page | 62

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Example- Worlds largest Cantilever Bridge

Figure 40: Quebec bridge, CANADA

Details of Quebec Bridge, CANADA

Total length: 987 m (3,239 ft)


Width: 29 m (94 ft) wide
Longest span : 549 m (1,800 ft)
Opened: December 3, 1919
Carries: 3 lanes of roadway
1 rail line
1 pedestrian walkway
Crosses: St. Lawrence River

Page | 63

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Example - Bangladesh China Friendship Bridge

Figure 41: Bangladesh China Friendship Bridge or Mukterpur Bridge, Bangladesh


(Source: Googlemap)

Details of Bangladesh China Friendship Bridge


Bridge Type : Pre-stressed concrete box girder
Length : 151 m (over river Dhaleswari on Dhaka-Munshigonj road)
Width : 10 m (carriage way - 7.5 m & sidewalk - 2x1.25 m)
No. of Lanes : 2 Lanes
No. of Span: 37 nos.
No. of Abutment: 2 nos.
No. of Piers: 38 nos.
Type of Foundation : Pile foundation

Page | 64

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Cantilever Span

Figure 42: All spans of Bangladesh China Friendship Bridge

Page | 65

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 43: Articulation/ Halving joint

Figure 44: A back view showing diaphragm/cross girder and longitudinal girder

Page | 66

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

DESIGN OF DIFFERENT COMPONENTS

Longitudinal Profile

Figure 45: Longitudinal profile a three spanned balanced cantilever bridge

Total Span, L g = 2 ft
Middle Span, L Assumed Relations:
M

End Span, L L = 1.25 L


E M E

Suspended Span, L L = 0.6 L


S c s

Cantilever Span, L H > L /14


C S

Page | 67

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Width of Longitudinal Girder,

Figure 46: Transverse section

S = [(Clear Road width Number of Girder Girder width) /(Number of Girder -


1)] 2 (Haunch width)
Design Specification & Method

AASHTO 2002
(American Association of State Highway & Transportation Officials)
USD Ultimate Strength Design Criteria

Page | 68

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

DESIGN OF DECK SLAB

Figure 47: Reinforcement in Deck Slab

Design Steps

Assume Slab thickness, t

Determine self-weight of slab = (150 t /12) psf

Consider wearing surface

Determine total dead load in psf , w (Self weight of slab + load of wearing surface
DL

2
Determine Dead load Moment , M = + (1/9 )w s
DL DL

Page | 69

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Determine Live load Moment , M = [{(s +2) /32} P


LL 15 or 20
] 0.8

[Here 0.8 is continuity factor as the slab is continuous over > 3 supports]

Determine Impact Moment, M = I (M ). Here Impact Factor, I = 50/(L +125)


I LL

Determine Total Moment, M = M + M + M


DL LL I

1/2
Check, d = [M / { b f (1- 0.59 f / f )}]
req. u max y max y c'

2
where M = b d f (1- 0.59 f / f )
u y y c'

Determine main steel area, A = M / [ f {d - (a/2)} where a = A f / 0.85 f b.


s (req) u y s y c'

Check, A >A
s (req) s(min)

Determine the distribution steel, P = 2.2/ < 0.67


distr

Page | 70

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

DESIGN OF RAILING

Figure 48: Railing and Post

Each railing shall be designed for 50 lb/ft uniformly distributed live load acting
simultaneously in both vertical and horizontal direction.
Opening between rails < 6 inch for portion 27 in. vertically from walkway surface.
Opening between rails < 8 inch for portion above 27 in. from walkway surface.

Design Steps:

Assume, 5in. X 5in. Railing


Consider Live load on each railing = 50lb/ft
Determine Dead load per unit length
Determine total load wT per unit length
Determine Maximum Moment = (1/10) wT l2
Determine steel Area As .

Page | 71

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

DESIGN OF RAIL POST

Figure 49: Rail Post

Minimum Height of Rail Post = 42 inch.


Rail posts shall be designed for only a lateral load of P = 50 L acting at the top of
the post where L= Spacing of the posts.

Page | 72

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

DESIGN OF CURB/SIDEWALK

Figure 50: Cross-section of Curb or Sidewalk

Determine P1, P2 , P3, P4.


Determine bending moment M & F at critical section
Determine steel area, As1 due to M
Determine As2 = F / ( fy )due to F
Place 50% of As2 at top & remaining 50% at bottom.

Page | 73

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

DESIGN OF INTERIOR GIRDER

Figure 51: Longitudinal and transverse profile of Interior Girder

Page | 74

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 52: Dead Loads and different sections of Interior Girder

Page | 75

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Table 9: Determining depth of interior girder at different sections


Section Distance from Depth of Girder, y Depth of Variable
Centreline (1loc.) (ft) (inch) part (inch)

10

11

12

13

14

Page | 76

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Dead load Analysis of Interior Girder


Determine Dead load coming from Self weight of slab & wearing surface.

Determine self weight of Longitudinal Girder from constant & variable part.

Determine self weight of cross girder/diaphram.

Dead Load from Variable part of Girder

Figure 53: Variable part of Interior Girder

Page | 77

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Table 10: Calculation of necessary data for Variable Part of Interior Girder
Section wij (ft) yi yj Load C.G. from Location
from left of load
(in.) (in.) Varying from CL
part (lb) (1loc.) (ft)
1-2

2-3

3-4

4-5

5-6

6-7

7-8

8-9

9-10

10-11

11-12

12-13

13-14

Page | 78

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Table 11: Determining concentrated load of cross girder/diaphram

Load of Diaphram Depth of Cross Width of Girder, bd Load (lb)


girder (in.) (inch)
P1

P2

P3

P4

P5

P6

Figure 54: Typical SFD and BMD of interior Girder due to dead loading

Page | 79

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Live Load Analysis of Interior Girder

Influence Line (IL)


IL is a digram showing the variation in shear, moment, reaction, stress in a
structure due to a unit load moving across the structure.

Miller Breslays Principle

The ordinates of IL for any stress element (such as axial force, shear force,
bending moment or reaction) of any structure are proportional to those of the deflection
curve which is obtained by removing the restrain corresponding to that element from
structure & introducing in its place, a corresponding deformation into the primary
structure which remains.

Figure 55: Influence line for shear and Moment at 2-section


Page | 80

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 56: Influence line for shear and Moment at 6&10-section

Figure 57: The dimension SG for live load multiplier


Page | 81

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 58: Forward and Reverse truck loading

Figure 59: Truck direction for Maximum positive and negative Shear

Page | 82

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 60: Lane loading as per AASHTO 2002

Figure 61: Lane load for Maximum positive and negative Moment at 10-section

Page | 83

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 62: Lane load for Maximum positive and negative Shear at 10-section

Page | 84

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Explanation of Loaded length (L) in Impact Formula

Figure 63: The length L for determining Impact Factor I

Page | 85

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Table 12: Design shear of Interior Girder at different sections

Page | 86

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Table 13: Design Moment of Interior Girder at different sections

Note: Use Dead load with its sign to combine with both positive and negative live load
moments

Page | 87

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Flexural Reinforcement Design of Interior Girder


Determine Effective width beff. for Interior Girder.

Choose minimum of Span/4, Centre to centre distance of Girder,

(16 x Slab thickness) + Girder Width for beff .

Consider the Design Moments for each sections.

Determine Steel Area As for maximum design moment.

Bar Cut-off will be done where required.

Table 14: Required flexural reinforcement of Interior Girder

Page | 88

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Shear Reinforcement Design of Interior Girder


Determine Shear Strength of Concrete,

Vc = 2 bw d

Determine required spacing of shear reinforcement,

sreq. = Av fy d / (Vu - Vc)

Also determine Maximum spacing for the check,

smax. = Av fy / (50 bw ) or, d/2 or, 24 inch (which one is the smallest)

Table 15: Required Shear reinforcement of Interior Girder


Section Design Shear Vc (kip) Av Srequired Sprovided
(kip)
(in.) (in.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Page | 89

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

DESIGN OF EXTERIOR GIRDER

Figure 64: Loads considered for Exterior Girder

Page | 90

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Live Load Analysis of Exterior Girder

Figure 65: The dimension d & SG for live load multiplier

Page | 91

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

DESIGN OF CROSS GIRDER/ DIAPHRAM

Figure 66: Cross-section of Cross Girder or Diaphram

Page | 92

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

ARTICULATION

The connection between the suspended span and the edge of the cantilever is
called Articulation.

The bearings at articulations can be in the form of sliding plates, roller-rocker


arrangement or elastomeric pads.

Figure 67: Possible Cracks near Articulation

Page | 93

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 68: Clearance requirement around bearing pad

Figure 69: Minimum Edge distance and expansion gap at articulation

Page | 94

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 70: Widening of Girder section for providing enlarged section near articulation

Page | 95

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Design of Articulation

Figure 71: Bearing and shear friction criteria considered for minimum width of bA

Page | 96

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

Figure 72: Elevation and plan view of Articulation showing reinforcement

Design Steps
Determine flexural steel area As1 based on moment MA .

Determine steel area As2 based on FA.

Determine steel area Ash based on direct tension of VA.

Determine required spacing s.

Page | 97

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

DETAILING OF ARTICULATION

Figure 73: Detailing of reinforcement

Page | 98

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II


AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY

REFERENCES

Lecture Note on CE 412, Prepared by Dr. Khan Mahmud Amanat,


Professor, Dept. of Civil Engg., BUET.

Lecture Note on CE 412, Prepared by Mr. Ruhul Amin, Assistant


Professor, Dept. of Civil Engg., BUET.

AASHTO Code 2002.

Nilson A.H., Darwin D., Dolan C.W. (2003), Design of Concrete


Structures, 13th edition, Mc. Graw Hill.

Page | 99

CE412: Structural Analysis & Design Sessional - II

You might also like