Professional Documents
Culture Documents
L.A.O.P.NO. 63 OF 2006.
Between:-
1. Mehtab Ali S/o. Khaja Sab R/o. Lonokur.
2. Medapathi Mallaiah S/o. Sangaiah (died) per L.Rs.
Claimants No.5, 6 and 7).
Respondent.
O R D E R:
1894(for short the Act) by the L.A.O. who be the Special Deputy
L.A.O) for determination of true and correct market value of the land
above individuals.
sake.
Sl.No Name of the House Extent of Rate per Structur Total value.
claimant. No land in sq. e value.
sq. meter meter.
1 Mehtab Ali. 1. 1-8/3 20-16 gts 6-00 8,932-00 9,083-00
--
2. M.Mallaiah. 1-66 70-63 6-00 13,118/- 13-541-00
3. L.Nagshetty 1-75/5 22-01 6-00 35,840/- 35,972-05
4. K,Veeraman 1-74/5 70-04 6-00 19,146/- 19,568-40
emma.
3
all claim statements are one and the same. They state that the L.A.O.
did not consider their claims in a proper perspecstive and they simply
awarded is very very poor and that they have received the said award
amount under the protest and thereafter this reference was got made
by them
found.
states that the L.A.O. did not consider the claims of the claimants in a
proper and reasonable manner, that PW2 along with his assistants
etc., etc.,
made in O.P.240/1996.
2. To what relief?
5
POINT NO.1:-
of the properties are assessed and what is the mode adopted by him
respect of the value of the open land and the value of the structures
respondent.
proper and scientifc way and that they simply mentioned some values
are acquired. They further contend that there are many villages
L.A.O.Ps. all the courts unanimously enhanced the rate of the land
from Rs.6-00 per square meter to Rs.8-00 per square meter and also
contend that the L.A.O.s did not prefer any appeals against the said
6
High Court also up-held the order of District Court in O.P.44/1997 and
Government/L.A.O.
claimants, inspite of the said notices, the respondent did not choose
regard to proper and just values of the properties. In all the above
land/site as Rs.8-00 per square meter. Thus the value of the land as
So also the Hon'ble Judges have taken the assessment made by the
engineer. In all most all every case of land acquisition belonging this
Konda was the person who assessed the value in a scientific manner
to Rs.8 per sq. meter from Rs.6-00 per sq. meter. So also the value of
examined as PW2.
16. Thus, taking all those things into consideration, the following is
Clai Awardee's Name. House Extent Structure Exhibit Value estimated Value of the
mant Numbe Sq. value fixed based on by PW2 structure already
Num r. meter. by the Architectural awarded in this
ber. L.A.O. Engineer. reference.
1. Mehtab Ali. 1-8/3 25-16 Rs. 8,932/- Ex.P1 Rs.72,000-00 Rs.50,400-00
2. M.Mallaiah S/o. 1-66 70-63 13,118/- Ex.P2 Rs. 1,05,000-00 Rs.73,500-00
Sangaiah. Per L.Rs.
C-5 to C7 namely;
1. M.Siddamma.
2.
M.Sagameshwar.
3. M.Veeresham.
3. C.Nagshetty S/o. 1-75/5 22-01 35,840/- Ex.P3 Rs.2,70,000-00 Rs. 1,89,000-00
Basappa died per
L.Rs. C-8 to C-11).
1. C.Veera
Manemma.
2. C.Satish Kumar.
3. L.Santosh
Kumar.
4.
L.Sangameshwar.
of the above table and also fixing the market value of the land at
(3) Interest at 9% for one year and thereafter at 15% P.A. till
the date of realization. The claimants are entitled for interest on 30%
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE.
WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR
PETITIONER. RESPONDENTS.
PW1 L. Satish Kumar. Nil.
PW2 Chandra Shekar Konda. Architectural Engineer.
PW3 M.Sangshetty.
PW4 P.Muralidhar.
10