Static Calculation for Flowtite Pipes

Project: SOHAR THERMAL POWERPLAN

Owner: ACWA
Agent: SEPCO-III
Calculation Nr.: MU-001
Date: 28/04/2017
Amiantit-Company: Amiantit Fiberglass Industries Ltd.
DRAFT
The software is a free tool, which may used by persons with technical knowledge
concerning the pipe statics, soil
mechanics and construction analysis. The software can not replace a structural e
ngineer.
The calculations are valid for products of the Amiantit Group only. All input fo
r the calculation have to be proved by the
user to ensure that the data equals the condtitions on the construction site. Th
e results of the calculation can be reached
only if it is proved that the input suits the real values. Calculations are base
d on values given by the user; data and
experiences are added if necessary. The results of this structural analysis may
be reached in practice only if the
assumptions meet the conditions found on the construction site. Appliance, fitti
ng and real loading are out of reach of the
software provider; these are the user's area of responsibility. The user is resp
onsible for the stability of a building and the
necessary material quantities.
Ami-Tools V. 4.8.1.3 - 28/04/2017 21:43:38 1
SOHAR THERMAL POWERPLAN
Content
1 Burried Pipe Design according AWWA M45 second edition: BURRIED PIPE 3
1.1 Input 3
1.2 Values from database 3
1.2.1 Installation conditions 3
1.2.2 Load Parameters 3
1.2.3 Advanced deflection options 3
1.3 Results 4
1.3.1 Confirmation of pressure class 4
1.3.2 Checking working pressure 4
1.3.3 Checking surge pressure 4
1.3.4 Calculation of deflection at allowable long-term strain 5
1.3.5 Calculation of soil load 5
1.3.6 Calculation of live loads 5
1.3.7 Calculation of the composite constrained soil modulus 5
1.3.8 Calculation of the predicted deflection 6
DRAFT
1.3.8.1 At minimum cover depth 6
1.3.8.2 At maximum cover depth 6
1.3.9 Checking combined loading 6
1.3.9.1 At minimum cover depth 6
1.3.9.2 At maximum cover depth 6
1.3.10 Checking buckling 7
1.3.10.1 At minimum cover depth 7
1.3.10.2 At maximum cover depth 7
1.3.10.3 At minimum cover depth 7
1.3.10.4 At maximum cover depth 7
Ami-Tools V. 4.8.1.3 - 28/04/2017 21:43:38 2
SOHAR THERMAL POWERPLAN
1 Burried Pipe Design according AWWA M45 second edition: BURRIED PIPE
1.1 Input
Caption: BURRIED PIPE
Assumptions: AWWA M45
Conclusion: none
Include sketch in output: Yes
Pipe from database: Yes
Selected pipe: PN16 SN5000 DN1000
Type of glassfibre pipe: Pressure Series (FP 2.1)
Pipe is pressure pipe: Yes
Nominal pressure: PN 16 [bar]
Nominal stiffness: SN 5000 [N/m]
Nominal diameter: DN 1000 [mm]
1.2 Values from database
DRAFT
Outer diameter: OD 1,025 mm
Nominal reinforced wall thickness (ASTM D3567): t 12.3 mm
Thickness of the liner: t
L
1.0 mm
Total wall thickness: t
t
13.3 mm
Hoop tensile modulus of elasticity: E
H
21,248.6 N/mm
Hydrostatic design basis: HDB 0.65 %
Ring-bending strain, long term: SB 1.30 %
1.2.1 Installation conditions
Maximum cover depth: H
max
3.0 m
Minimum cover depth: H
min
1.2 m
Groundwater: Yes
Depth to water table: H
max
1.0 m
Depth to water table: H
Wmin
0.5 m
Trench width: B
d
2.0 m
Soil stiffness category (Table 6-1): SC1: Crushed rock, < 15% sand, < 5%
fines
Type of filling (Table 5-4): Compacted
Backfill unit weight: 18.8 kN/m
Specific weight below water: 11.5 kN/m
Material and Compaction (Table 5-1): Sand; compaction: moderate to high
Native soil type (Table 5-6): Granular
Native soil (granular): Very, very loose (0 - 1 blows/ft)
Bedding coefficient: Inconsistent haunch achievement (Kx =
1.2.2 Load Parameters
Working pressure: P
w
0,1)
2.40 bar
Surge pressure: P
s
3.20 bar
Vacuum pressure: P
v
1.00 bar
Traffic load: HS 20 Truck load
1.2.3 Advanced deflection options
Standard deflection coeffizient / lag factor: Yes
Standard permitted deflection (5%): Yes
Ami-Tools V. 4.8.1.3 - 28/04/2017 21:43:38 3
SOHAR THERMAL POWERPLAN
1.3 Results
Traffic load: HS 20 Truck load
Mean pipe diameter: D 1,012.67 mm
D =OD - t
1.3.1 Confirmation of pressure class
P
c
<
HDB
FS

2 t E
H
D
(5-2)
Pressure class: P
c
16.00 bar
Value for (HDB/FS)(2t EH / D): P
c,max
18.69 bar
The pressure class of the pipe is smaller than (HDB/FS)(2tEH/D).
1.3.2 Checking working pressure
P
c
=P
(5-3)
Working pressure: P
w
w
2.40 bar
Pressure class: P
c
16.00 bar
The working pressure is lower than pressure class of the pipe.
1.3.3 Checking surge pressure
P
c
=
P
w
+ P
s
DRAFT
1.4
(5-4)
Working pressure: P
w
2.40 bar
Surge pressure: P
s
3.20 bar
Pressure class: P
c
16.00 bar
Working pressure + surge pressure is lower than 1.4 times pressure class of the
pipe.
Ami-Tools V. 4.8.1.3 - 28/04/2017 21:43:38 4
SOHAR THERMAL POWERPLAN
1.3.4 Calculation of deflection at allowable long-term strain
?y
t
t
a
=
S
b
D
FS D
=t + t
L
f
2
t
t
Shape factor: D
f
5.5 [-]
Maximum allowable Iong-term vertical pipe deflection (absolute): ?y
a
121.22 mm
Maximum allowable Iong-term vertical pipe deflection (relative): ?y
a
/D 11.97 %
Maximum permitted long-term installed deflection: dd/D 5.00 %
The maximum permitted long-term installed deflection is smaller than the maximum
allowable Iong-term deflection.
1.3.5 Calculation of soil load
W
c
=?
s
H
(5-9)
at minmum
depth
at maximum
depth
Cover height H 1.20 3.00 m
Vertical soil load on the pipe W
c
22.56 56.40 kN/m
Vertical soil load on the pipe, considering buoyancy W
c
' 17.45 41.80 kN/m
1.3.6 Calculation of live loads
Traffic load: HS 20 Truck load
at minmum
depth
at maximum
depth
I
=1 + 0.33 [(2.44 m - h)/2.44 m] = 1 (5-11)
Impact factor I
f
f
1.17 1.00 [-]
Factor to account for live load distribution with depth of fill LLDF 1.15 1.15 [
-]
Length of tire footprint t
l
254 254 mm
L
1
=t
+ LLDF H (5-12)
Load width parallel to direction of travel L
1
l
1.63 3.70 m
Width of tire footprint t
w
h
int
=
(1.83 m - t
)
LLDF
w
Depth at which load from wheels interacts h
int
L
L
2
2
=t
=
t
w
w
+ LLDF H H = h
+ 1.83 m + LLDF H
2
int
H > h
int
Load with perpendicular to direction of travel L
2
508 508 mm
1.1 1.1 m
1.86 2.89 m
Wheelload at surface P 71.3 71.3 kN
W
L
=
1.2 P I
L
1
L
2
f
Traffic load on surface W
L
32.89 7.98 kN/m
1.3.7 Calculation of the composite constrained soil modulus
M
s
=S
c
M
sb
DRAFT
(5-19)
at minmum
depth
at maximum
depth
Additional factor for the soil modulus due to vertical stress
(note 7, table 5-4)
f
w
1.00 1.00 [-]
Ami-Tools V. 4.8.1.3 - 28/04/2017 21:43:38 5
SOHAR THERMAL POWERPLAN
(5-6)
(5-15)
(5-13)
(5-14)
(5-10)
Constrained soil modulus of the pipe zone embedment M
sb
19.11 24.90 N/mm
Constrained soil modulus of the native soil at pipe elevation M
sn
0.34 0.34 N/mm
Soil support combining factor S
c
0.18 0.16 [-]
Composite constrained soil modulus M
s
3.46 4.00 N/mm
1.3.8 Calculation of the predicted deflection
?y
D
=
(D
L
W
c
+ W
L
) K
0.149 PS + 0.061 M
x
s
Bedding coefficient K
x
at minmum
depth
0.100 0.100 [-]
Deflection lag factor D
L
1.500 1.500 [-]
Predicted vertical pipe deflection ?y/D 2.7 3.3 %
Maximum permitted long-term installed deflection dd/D 5.00 5.00 %
1.3.8.1 At minimum cover depth
The predicted deflection is lower than the permitted deflection.
1.3.8.2 At maximum cover depth
The predicted deflection is lower than the permitted deflection.
1.3.9 Checking combined loading
e
pr
HDB
=
e
b
r
S
b
c
1 e
=
1 -
b
r
S
FS
b
pr
e
pr
HDB
FS
b
c
Pressure design factor FS
pr
at minmum
depth
1.80 1.80 [-]
Bending design factor FS
b
1.50 1.50 [-]
Rerounding coefficient r
c
0.92 0.92 [-]
Working strain due to internal pressure e
pr
0.05 0.05 %
Working strain due to maximum permitted deflection e
b
0.36 0.36 %
?pr / HDB 0.07 0.07 [-]
[1 - ((eb rc) / Sb)] / FSpr 0.41 0.41 [-]
(eb rc) / Sb 0.26 0.26 [-]
[1 - (epr / HDB)] / FSb 0.62 0.62 [-]
1.3.9.1 At minimum cover depth
Combined loading (working strain due to internal pressure) is ok.
Combined loading (working strain due to maximum permitted deflection) is ok.
1.3.9.2 At maximum cover depth
DRAFT
Combined loading (working strain due to internal pressure) is ok.
Combined loading (working strain due to maximum permitted deflection) is ok.
at maximum
depth
at maximum
depth
Ami-Tools V. 4.8.1.3 - 28/04/2017 21:43:38 6
SOHAR THERMAL POWERPLAN
(5-8)
(5-22)
(5-23)
1.3.10 Checking buckling
q
a
=
1
FS

1.2 C
n
' 8 SN
0.33

(f
s
M
s
k
?
)
0.67
R
h
(5-24b)
at minmum
depth
Design factor, buckling FS 2.50 2.50 [-]
Scalar calibration factor to account for some nonlinear effects C
n
' 0.55 0.55 [-]
Factor to account for variability in stiffness of compacted soil f
s
' 0.90 0.90 [-]
Modulus correction factor for poisson's ratio of soil ?
?
' 0.74 0.74 [-]
Correction factor for depth of fill R
h
' 0.96 1.01 [-]
Allowable buckling pressure q
a
(5-25) q
v
= ?
w
h
w
+ R
w
W
c
+ P
v
=q
a
Specific weight of water ?
w
at maximum
depth
153.54 176.95 kN/m
9.80 9.80 kN/m
Height of water surface above top of pipe h
w
0.70 2.00 m
Water buoyancy factor R
W
0.81 0.78 [-]
Buckling pressure, groundwater + soilload + vacuum q
v
125.08 163.59 kN/m
1.3.10.1 At minimum cover depth
The calculated buckling pressure due to groundwater, soil pressure and vacuum pr
essure is lower than the allowable
buckling pressure.
1.3.10.2 At maximum cover depth
The calculated buckling pressure due to groundwater, soil pressure and vacuum pr
essure is lower than the allowable
buckling pressure.
(5-26) q
v
= ?
w
h
w
+ R
w
W
c
+ W
L
=q
a
Buckling pressure, groundwater + soil + traffic q
w
57.97 71.57 kN/m
1.3.10.3 At minimum cover depth
The calculated buckling pressure due to groundwater, soil pressure and traffic l
oads is lower than the allowable
buckling pressure.
1.3.10.4 At maximum cover depth
The calculated buckling pressure due to groundwater, soil pressure and traffic l
oads is lower than the allowable
buckling pressure.
All necessary proofs are ok.
DRAFT
Ami-Tools V. 4.8.1.3 - 28/04/2017 21:43:38 7
SOHAR THERMAL POWERPLAN