GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND

LIMITED PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

of
Twin Boro Field
Block 1105, Lot 15
Borough ofDumont
Bergen County, New Jersey

Prepared For:
Borough of Dumont
50 Washington Avenue
Dumont, New Jersey 07621

I June 16, 2010

Our File No: A·660·016·001

Alaimo Group
200 High Street, Mt. Holly, NJ 08060 Tel: 609 267·8310 Fax: 609 267·0301
2 Market Street, Paterson, NJ 07501 Tel: 973 523-6200 Fax: 973 523-1765
 Geotechnical Evaluation and
Limited Phase II Enviro/lmental Site Assessment of
Twin Bo/"o Field
Borough of Dumont
Bergell Coullly, New Jersey

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 .0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1
1.1 Scope of Work ..... . .. . .......... .. ......... ... ....... . ... . .. . .. ............. .. ..... ... ...... .... ...... 1

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION . ...... . ........... ............ . . .... . . ........ .. ...... . .......
. . .. u . . . . . .. .. . . u ..... 2
2.1 Location ................ .................................................................................. 2
2.2 Topography ......... .. .
. ...... . ... .
.. . ... . . . .. .. ........ . .. ... . ... .... . . . . ...... ... . ... . .... .......... . 2
.

2.3 Geology ... .... ... ........... ... . . ....... . ......

. ... . . ..,.............................. ,"' ..... ,...... 2
.. ..

2.4 Soil Conditions . ... . ..... ..... ...... . ... "., ......... , .. , ............... , ............................. 2
.

2.5 Hydrology .... . ...

. .... ... .. . .... ... . .
. .. ........ . "..................................................... 2
2.6 Land Use Context. . ... . ...
.. ......... . "", .......... "......... "",............................... 2
.

2.7 Utilities ... ........ ... .. ... ..

. ... . ..... . ,...................................... ".........',......... """, 2

3.0 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION ................................................................ 3

3.1 Field and Laboratory Testing Program ... ...... . ....... .. . . ..... .. ... 3 . .. . . .. ... ... . ..... .

3.2 Subsurface Conditions ... .. ... .... . . . .. . ... .. ..

. . . ... .... 4
........ .. ..... .. . ... .. . . .. .... . ....... . .

3.3 Discussion of Geotechnical Results .... ... . . ... ..... . ........ . .... . ... . .. .
. . . . ....... .. .. 5
. .

3.4 Site Maintenance/Improvement Alternatives . . ..... . .......... . . ............. . .... . ... 6

3.5 Additional Subsurface Evaluation... . .. ... . . .. ...... ..
. ..... .. ........ . .... . ... . ........... .7

4.0 UMITED PHASE II ESA: SITE Il\'VESTIGATION .................... .............. 8 .

4.1 Environmental Testing Program . ... . ....... . .. . . . .. " ............................... 8

.. . .. . . .

4.2 Laboratory Analysis ... . ... ........ . ...... . .. . . .. ..

. .. .. .. . ..... . ..... , ....................... "",8
4.3 Discussion of Analytical Results .... ..... ..... . .... ..
. . . ........ ... ..
.. . ... . . ... . .. 10
. .. .. .

4.4 Additional Environmental Evaluation ....... .. . ........ .. . . ........ . ... .. . ... . ......... II

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................ 1 2

5.1 Limitations .. . . . . . ..... ... ... . .. .. .. .. ..... "..,................................,............. 12
. . .. .. . . .

5.1.1 Geotechnical Evaluation . . ... . ......... . . .... .... .. . ...... ... . ..... .... . ...... . .. 12
..

5.1.2 Limited Phase II: Site Investigation ........ ......... . . . ..... .. .

. .. . .. .. .... . . 12
5.2 Conclusions . .... .. ... .. .. . . .. . "............. ".........,',.............. ,............................ 13
5,2, I Geotechnical Evaluation .... . . ........ . ..... . .. . .
... . . ... .. .... . .... . ..
. .......... . 13
5.2.2 Limited Phase II: Site Investigation . ....... ... "............................. 13
5,2,3 Areas ofConcern .. . . ...... .. . .... ..
. ...... .. . .. ... . .
. .. . . . ..... .
..... . . . ..
.. . .. ..... . . 14
.

5.3 Recommendations .... . ,...,........,""',...................... ,',............................. 14

5,3.1 Environmental Reporting . ... .. ...
. .. . . .... ... ..... . ..... . .... . . .. .
. .. .. . . ... ..
. . .. 14
5.3.2 Remedial Investigation ... " ......................... " .............................. 15
5,3,3 Remedial Action ...... . . ... .. . .. ... .. . ..... .. . . ....... . . . .. ..... ........... ....... . . . " 15
.

5.3,4 Restricted Use . .. . .. . ...... . " .............. "..... " ............................... " .. 15
.
 Geotechnical Evaluatioll amI
Limited Phase II Ellvirollmelltaf Site Assessmellt of
Twill Bom Field
Borough of DI/mollt
Bergell COlll/ty, New Jersey

LIST OF TABLES

Tllble Descriptioll Page

Table I Summary of Subsurface Conditions .............. . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . ......... 4

Table 2 Summary of Analytical Results .................................................... 9
Table 3 Comparison to Historic Fill Database ................. ....................... 11

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Description Page

Figure 1 Boring Location Sketch after 15

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appelld/xA Borillg Logs

Appelldlx B Laboratory Data Deliverables
 Geotechnical Evallllltioll alUl
Limited Phase II Euvlronmental Site Assessment of
Twill Bom Park,. Block 1105, Lot 15
Borough ofDUmollt
Bergen CO/tilly, New Jersey

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Alaimo Group was retained by the Borough of Dumont to perform this Geotechncial
Evaluation and Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of Borough owned property
known as Twin Bol'o Field, which is part of Twin Bol'o Park. The subject property is denoted as a palt of
Block 1 !O5; Lot 15 on the Dumont Borough Tax Assessment Map (sec Figure 2) and is accessible from
Aladdin Avenue via Darcy Lane.

The purpose of this evaluation is (0 follow-up on the findings of the Phase I ESA which found
evidence of differential soil stability apparently due to historic filling activities.

1.1 Scope Of Worl,

The geotechnical evaluation consisted of the installation of six (6) t est borings to asceltain the
sllbslHfacc conditions and the limited Phase II ESA involved the sampling of fill from those borings for
the presence of environmental contaminants.

The scope of work for the Limited Phase II Site Investigation was outlined in a letter proposal
dated March 30, 20 I 0 from the Alaimo Group. The work was completed in substantial compliance with
the accepted proposal.

- J -
 Geotechllicaf Evaluatioll olld
Limited Phose II Ellvirollmental Site Assessmellt of
Twill Bo/'o Field
Borollgh ofDUlllout
Bergel! COllllty, New Jersey

2.0 SITE DESCItlPTION

2.1 Location

The Phase I ESA was conducted of the entire tract, known as Block 1105, Lot 15, but the limited
Phase II Site Investigation has focused on Twin Boro Field where historic filling repOltedly occlIl'red.

2.2 Topogl'aphy

The Site topography can be characterized as gently sloping to east/nOlthcast.

2.3 Geology

According to regional geologic mapping. the Site is underlain by at least 10 feet of Rahway glacial
till which is characterized as reddish brown to reddish yellow silty sand. The underlying bedrock is
denoted as the Passaic Formation and consists of sandstone and siltstone about 20-25 feet below the
ground surface.

2.4 Soil Conditions

The soils on the Site are mapped as .!ldorthents.loamy (9-8 percentJ'l2p�f�uently l1.9od<&l
UdkffB and are classified as well-drained soils with a moderately low-to-moderately high capacity to
transmit water. The typical profile consists of 12 inches of loam underlain by 48 inches of silty clay.

2.5 Hydrology

There are no flood pI'one areas or wetlands within the limits of the Site.

2.6 Land Use Context

The Site is gcncmlly located in a residential area of medium intensity and is bordered to the
north by single-family detached residences; to the cast by a high rise apartment bui Iding; to the west
by the remainder of Twin Boro Park; and to the south by lands owned by Bergenfield Borough llsed
for public and recreational purposes. The Site consists of a multi-purpose field known as Twin Boro
Field. Other recreational fucilities in Twin Boro Park include a street hockey rink and a swim club
that is leased to a non-profit organization.

2.7 Utilities

The area is served by public water and sewer, electricity, phone, and other utilities.

-2·
 Geotechnical Evaluation amI
Limited Pbase II Ellvirollmelltal Site Assessment of
Twill Boro Field
Borough ofDumont
Bergen Coullty, New Jersey

3.0 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATlON

The geotechnical evaluation of the Twin Boro Field was undertaken by the Alaimo Group in
conjunction with a geotechnical subsconsultant, Duffield Associates of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

3.t Field and Laboratory Testing Program

A total of six (6) Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings were performed at the Twin Boro
Field in general accordance with ASTM D 1586 on May 1 2,20 I O. The test borings were installed to
a maximum depth of 20 feet below the existing ground surface. The test boring locations are shown
on Figure 1. The test boring locations were se lected to evaluate the four corners of the field as well
as the approximate center of the field.

The test borings were performed by Granese Drilling Inc. of Shrewsbury, New Jersey
utilizing a truck mounted Mobile B-59 drill rig with hollow stem augers. All work was performed
under the direct supervision of the geotechnical subconsultanL Test boring Jogs prepared by Duffield
Associates describing the conditions encountered are presented in Appelldix A oHhis report.

At the completion of the drilling, the boreholes were tremie grouted with a bentonite-cement
grout with the exception of TB-2. During the execution of TB-2, the subconsultant observed that the
sidewalls of the borehole had caved during drilling and the borehole had incl'cased in size to a
diameter of approximately 15 inches. A representative of the Borough of Dumont was contacted and
material was provided by the DPW for the backfilling of the TB-2 borehole. After the auger was
removed, the borehole was backfilled with the soil cuttings and sand from an onsite stockpilc.

Excess soil was mounded above each test boring location to compensate for potential future
settlement at the boring locations. No additional compactive effort or site restoration was performed.
Additional settlement and softening of the grout and soil placed in the boreholes may occur resulting
in a depression or hole in the ground surface. Consequently, future maintenance and restoration of
the boring locations may be required to prevent uneven surface conditions.

Soil samples were obtained during the field exploration program and used for subsequent
laboratory testing for geotechnical properties and environmental contaminants. The geotechnical
testing consisted of determining the natural moisture content (ASTM D 2216) and the percent
passing the No. 200 sieve (ASTM sill1c1ay fraction) for a total of seven samples obtained from the
test borings. The results of the geotechnical laboratory testing were used to aid in the classification of
the soils encountered that are summarized on the boring logs.

During the field investigation, each of the soil samples obtained form the borings was field
screened using a photoionization detector (PID). Additional environmental lahoratory testing was
performed 011 several soil samples obtained during the test borings. The results of the laboratory
analyses are presented in Section 4.0 of this report.

-3-
Twin Boro Field: Dumont Borough June 16,2010
Geoteclmi�.�1 Evaluation and Limited PUa§e lJ ESA Rep011 Page4

3.2 SubsUl'face Conditions

Beneath a layer of topsoil, the subsurface conditions encountered on the Site can generally be
described as apparent and possible fiI! material consisting of loose to medium density silty sand
ranging in depth from three (3) to six (6) feel below ground sW'face (bgs). The apparent fill material
was determined to overlay natmal fine-grained material (silt and clay) of mediuIII to very stiff
consistency and loose to very dense sand with varying amounts of silt and clay.

The apparent fill stratum was observed to contain small amounts of miscellaneous debris
(e.g., crushed stone, organics, wire insulation, coal fi'agments) in test borings TB-I, TB-3, and TB-5.
In addition to this stratum of miscellaneous debris, a layer containing small amounts of organic
materials (e.g., roots and leaves) was obselved in test borings TB-2 and TB-5 at depths ranging from
six (6) to eight (8) feet and fi'Om three (3) to foul' (4) feet bgs, respectively.

Refusal (0 the advancement of the drilling augers was encountered in several of the borings
pelformed during this evaluation. Shallow refusal to the advancement of tbe drilling augers was
obselved at a depth of 8 feet during the construction of test boring TB-2. The reason for refusal is not
known but appeared to be a subsurface obstruction rather than geologic rock. Auger and split spoon
refusal on apparent massive rock was obselved at depths ranging fi'om 17 to 18 feet bgs in test
borings TB-I and TB-3. Drilling refusal was not encountered during the perfolmance of test borings
TB-4, TB-5, and TB-6 to the depth of the borings. The general subsurfltce conditions encountered
are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1
,-_=-:___..,._;-_-,--"
S o:, Subsur ace COfldit."oic:':.;.:. /'\,..
:cIl:.:1t",lm=T(I""rL.: · �;;;-_�;-_______--,
SII'alum App"oxlmate G eneralized Description
thickness "fe c: et" L-+
A 0.3-0.5 TOPSOIL :-:-���� ..........- - ---;���-
1.5 Apparent FILL: brown, orange brown, black, red-brown fine to medium
sandj some to trace silt, trace coarse sand, trace gravel, trace debris (ie.,
�nr-----+-----c-=-- ---f.. crushed stone, organics, ..wire insulation} coal fragments); � :::o st�
",i", --i __

C 4.0-- Orange-brown, brown, red-brown fine to medium SAND, some to trace

sil t/clay, little to Irace gravel, trace Coarse sand (moist to wet, loose to
S -:-
: _ _ _ _--I__-;-;;-;;-�-- t--;v:;;�, n ) ; m;g""s::.: ," M�, S",pc>., ::SC� �---.-;o---_
e r de se
f-;;:m-
D 1.0-2.0 ORGANICS (Le., roots, leaves); black fine to medium SAND; some
___+ -;;-
� __ +� �
__ - or anies (Le., ro o ts);}ittle silt; (wet) ..
E 9.0-- Red, brown, white, black SILT/CLAY, some to trace fine to medium
sand, trace coarse sand, tracc gravel (Moisl to wet, medium to stiff
__
..::L
--"--,c",o=nsisteney); USCS;lvI ::::L
::J,c: C "--______ �

NOTES:
1. Soil descriptions utilized herein mrd ou tlte test boring logs are defined in the (lunched General Notes.
2. Stratum B not encountered during lest borings TB-4 and TB-6.
3. Stratum C not encountered during test boring TB-5 and noljitJly pene/m/ca in lest borings TB-4 (I11d TB-6,
4, So'aluItT D only enCOllltlered in lest borings TB-2 and TO-5.
5, S!.!:r!!Jlt!L.fi only ellcoll1Y�t�d ill test bOJi!!g�--,!]J-l and TB-�_gt!.dJ!ot /iJllypen_t:!�qj�4JtJ test bOJ'illg]!t:�.�
__ ........
� ________
�

Groundwater obselvations during the performance of the test borings are indicated 011 the test
boring logs. In general, groundwater was encountered in tbe test borings ranging from 4.8 to 9.0 feet
below the existing ground sUiface.

-4-
Twin Bol'o Field: Dumont Borough June 16,2010
Geote<;hnical EYal1!ation and Limited 1'111\�e II ESe. Report _��..... .. �______ ,,,e-"'
Pmag
"- '5
.

3.3 Discussioll of Geotechnical Results

The northern palt of the field (borings TB·\ and TB·5) exhibited the characteristics of
granular fill material to a depth of 4 to 6 feet below the ground surface, underlain by natural silt,
clayey silt, and clay to the depth of the borings (10·18 feet bgs). The fill layer contained trace debris
near the surface and significant quantities of organic materials in the nOltheast cornel' of the Site (TB·
5) in a layer at a depth of 3 to 4 feet bgs.

The central part of the field (borings TB-2 and TB-6) exhibited the characteristics of granular
fill material to a depth of 5 to 8 feet below the ground surface, underlain by natural sand to the depth
of the borings (20 feet bgs). The filliayel' contained significant quantities of organic materials in one
of the two test borings (TB-2) at a depth of 6 to 8 feet below the ground surface. Directly below this
fiUlayer with organics, auger refusal occurred, apparently as a result of a subsurface obstruction.

The southem part of the field (borings TB·3 and TB-4) exhibited the characteristics of
granular fill material to a depth of approximately 6 feet below the ground surface, underlain by
natural sand to the depth of the borings (17-20 feet bgs). The fiUlayer contained evidence of trace
debris near the surface.

The presence of apparent fill over the entire field is of concel'll from a geotechnical
evaluation perspective for the following reasons:

•
The method placement is unknown.
•
The condition of the suhgrade priOl' to placement of the fill is unknown.
•
The consistency of the fill soils is unknown.

The placement of fill materials in an uncontrolled manner can result in differential 01' uneven
settlement. If the fill materials were not placed in an engineered manner or if the fill materials were
not consistent, settlement will occur. The rate of settlement will tend to diminish with time. In this
patticular case, there has been considerable time since the conversion of the site to recreational use.
In addition, due to the predominately granular (sand) consistency of the fill material, it is probable
that the majority of the settlement has occurred.

Nevertheless, continued settlement may occur in areas of fill containing significant quantities
of debris 01' organic materials. At this Site, a layer with significant quantities of organic materials was
observed at 6 to 8 feet below the ground surface in test boring TB-2 and at 3 to 4 feet below ground
in TB-5. The areal extent of this organic layer has not been determined but its presence is consistent
with the information presented in the Phase I ESA based on the key site manager interview.

Based on the conditions observed, the continued development of "depressions" in the field
will be primarily associated with the organic and debris layers that have been identified. Settlement
will occur as gradual depressions 01' as sudden changes in the ground surface due to the collapse of a
soil laycr. In fact, very loose conditions and a possible subsurface void were observed during the
performance of test boring TB·2 when the sidewalls of the borehole were observe to cave and the
borehole increased in diameter to approximately 15 inches.

-5-
Twin Boro Field: DUlllont Borough June 16,2010
Geotechnic�1 Ev�luation al!!lJjmited Phase II ESA Report Page 6

3.4 Site MailltcnancelImpfovement Alternatives

The geotechnical sllbconsliitants have developed several options regarding the maintenance
and improvement of the recreational field. The option that is selected will depend upon the inlital
construction cost, long-tenn maintenance cost, and the importance of the facility in serving the
Borough's recreational needs.

•
Removal and Replacement of fill. One option is to completely remove the previously
placed fill material and replace it with suitable material placed in controlled lifts with
proper compaction. The geotechnical subconsultants have estimated that up to 5 feet of
fill material would need to be undercut in areas of the field where debris and/Ol' organics
were evident. Shallow test bodngs would be needed to delineate the extent of the organic
and debris areas. The removal of the previously placed fill materials would also allow
confirmation that firm subgrade conditions were present prior to placement and
compaction of suitable fill in controlled lifts. The site cou Id be regraded to improve
surface drainage and, if necessary, underdrains could be installed. An in-igation system
for the field could also be installed without concern about continued settlement.

In-place Densification. The in-place densification of tile shallow subsurface conditions

may be considered a practical means of improving the subsurface conditions. The
purpose of the densification process would be to induce the settlement of underlying
materials into void spaces and thereby reduce the magnitude of future settlement and to
identify yielding conditions. The geotechnical subconsultants have indicated that to
achieve the required subgrade improvement, the site would be densified with at least 20
passes of a IS-ton (minimum) vibratory roller. (A "pass" equals up and back.) Ten passes
would be performed in a north-south direction and ten passes would be performed in an
east-west direction. Once this densiftcation process was completed, the areas whel'C
settlement has been induced would be stripped of topsoil and filled with suitable granular
material in loose lifts as needed to establish grade. Areas that have been identified as
yielding or areas where otherwise unsuitable sllbgrade conditions are encountered would
be undercut to fil<m subgrade conditions and backfilled with compacted fill. The fill
material would be compacted to a firm condition before the placement of topsoil. It is
anticipated that even after this procedure is completed, some continued settlement would
likely continue to occur as a result of decomposition of the organic and debris containing
matel'ial that has been identified. Therefore, this option will significantly reduce, but not
eliminate, settlement and the need for future maintenance.

• Continued Periodic Maintenance. The least cost option for the Borough is to continue to
periodic regrading and filling of depressions in the ground surface in response to
differential settlement. This appl'Oach would address the settlement of the pl'Cviously
placed fiU containing debris and organics but is not preventive. While this option would
reduce the initial cost, it would necessitate continued maintenance costs and will not
reduce the potential for settlement. At a minimum, the surface would be stripped of
topsoil and granular fill would be placed in loose lifts with a maximum thickness of eight
inches. Yielding or othelwise unsuitable subgrade conditions that encountered would be
undercut to firm subgrade conditions and backfilled with compacted fill. The fill would
be compacted to a finn condition prior to the placement of topsoil.

-6-
Twin Bom Field: DUlIlont Borough Juno 16,2010
GCQtecll(licalEv ."lua!ioll@..Q.
J JlllitcdYhase ILESA RCllorl._... __� ._. . _ . __ .. ..
. Page 7

The factors that need to be considered in selecting an improvement option are the quality of
the desired recreational facility and the capital cost needed to achieve that facility.

The least cost alternative is a continuation of the frequent maintenance activities needed to
fill voids and depressions that develop over time. However, the differential settlement detracts from
the quality of the recreational field and undoubtedIy impacts the safety of the participants.

The denisilication process will improve the facility and substantially reduce the occurrence of
differential settlement by improving the compaction of the shallow surface layer. In simplistic terms,
this method will reduce, but not eliminate, differential settlement. It also has the advantage of not
exposing the fill materials of questionable quality that have been detected.

The best and morc costly alternative would be to remove several feet of unsuitable material
and replace it with suitable compacted fill on a stable subgrade. This approach would effectively
eliminate any future settlement and enable the development of an excellent recreational facility. The
one factor that affects this option is whether the excavated material requires disposal due to its
environmental quality.

3.5 Additional Subsurface Evaluation

Additional subsurface evaluation is recommended prior to the selection of the improvement

option to morc fully define the extent of the fill layers containing debris and organics and to identifY
the presence, orientation, and relative size of any below grade voids, obstructions, or surface
irregularities. A non-destructive geophysical survey utilizing ground penetrating radar (GPR) or
electromagnetic conductivity (EM) methods would be employed for this purpose. The geophysical
survey should be supplemented with shallow test borings that will confirm the subsurface conditions.
Based 011 the survey and the shallow test borings, the area and depth of the undercutting and the
placement of compacted fill can be morc full determined.

-7-
 Geotechnical Emll/ation (/1/(1
Limited Phase II Ellvirolllnel1ta/ Site Assessment of
Twin Boro Field
Boraugh ofDumOflf
Berge/f COI/llty, New Jersey

4.0 LIMITED PHASE II: SITE INVESTI GATION

4.1 En vi mn m en ta l Testing Program

In order to determine the quality of the subsurface materials, the tests and procedures described in
this section were undel1aken.

A photoionization detector (PID) was used during the installation of all six (6) test borings and did
not detcct potential volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in any of the test borings.

As noted above, physical observations of the borings revealed the presence of a layer containing
significant quantities of organic materials in test borings TB-2 and TB-5 at depths ranging from 6 to 8 feet
and 3 to 4 feet respectively.

A total of four (4) soil samples were collected and submitted to the laboratory for analysis. Two
(2) samples were collected for analytical testing fi'om the layers containing significant quantities of
organic material. These samples were obtained from the 5 to 6 foot below the ground surface (bgs)
interval in TB-2 and from the 3 to 4 foot bgs interval in TB-5. The l\vo other samples selected for
analytical testing were fl'om were from the 2 to 3 foot interval in TB-1 and from 6 to 7 feet bgs interval in
TB-3.

The four samples were sent to Test America Inc. of Edison, New Jersey for the following
analyses:

Priority Pollutant List (PPL) metal by the EPA Methods SW-846 60 I OB and 7470A;
PPL VOCs by EPA Method SW-846 8260B;
PPL semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method SW-846 8270D;
•
PPL pesticides by EPA Method SW-846 8081A; and,
•
PPL polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by EPA Method SW-846 8082;

4.2 Laboratory Analysis

The Test America analytical reports are presented in Appendix A and are summal'ized in this
section as well as on Table 1. The analytical results shown in Table 1 are compared to the NJDEP
guidance values for Residential and Non-residential Direct Contract New Jersey Soil Remediation
Standards Soil Cleanup Criteria as published in the NJAC 7:26D Remediation Standards last revised 011
November 4, 2009.

-8-
Twin Boro Field: Dumont Borough June 16, 2010
Geoteehnical Evaluation and Limited Ph�.�e II ESA Re",p�or�t ___ Page 9

Table 2
Summary ofAllalytcal Results

I'PL SEMIVOLATILE COMPOUNDS (SVOCs) in m .. k",-;g,-,-;

, __ ,- _--,
Accnapl;iii,iie·
..... ······Nil O.II -o-
J --==
ND 0.20 J 3,400 37,000
�ph'Il1'lcl1e NO 0.097 J Nil Nil NA 300,000
Anlhracene - N O _ _ O 2. 4_--'J ND 0.26 J 17,000 30,000
I -.;,"' .;;";;
BCl1zo[njnnlhfll.,,,,IO NO;- --t +--;.O, �7"1,___I-...O�.2 ... . J I-�".O 7
", 8........ 38;-__+-___�O" .6:�O +____-;C".2 0:c-l
DelllO[n!pyreno ND 0.69 NO 0.41 0.20 I 0.20
�?.olb!flno..nlhcnc Nil 0.82 NO 059 0 .6�O +___=",2".0: 1
..:d;;; -
• mBenzQi i!:h.liiierYl cne NO 0.68 N Il _ --c0",.46--,--,J'--I_ �_
;- +
� 380,OOO
.. 30,000
",
Bcn701�!flno",I�(iemc ND 0.30 NO 0.23 6.0 23
liifz:ethYlhc�l1lJ'I1!llal"t" ND 0.21 J 0.12 J 0.19 J 35 140
Chryscllc Nil 0.96 NO 0.56 J 62 230
Dlbenz a h)anthrncene- ND 0.13 ND ND 0,20 0 ,20
� l1lnlhene.... NO _ t---i-L;c8�_-;-+-� N7.D � 1.3 2,.3QZ�� ....
�
24,OOO
Flnorene .. _ . ND 0.15 J ND 0.44 J 2,300 24,000
" n"'c____---i'_-f,N*O:--.._ +--';.O e;6!.1.___I---BN�
--l!'d enoJI,2,3,C<!Jt>yre" D :-"�+--'0.7 4'"6'-- --+ ---�10 . 6, O --o;;o;c2 . 0
�
�I.�anthrel\c : ND 1.5 ND 1.8 :Cf+
NA 300,000
PYrrne j NO 1.5___ NO __
+-'= +-� . 0.79
�� _ ...c:.+___-",=+-.. _..
J 1,700 18,000
=--- +-
No othcrSYOCs detected-,----I--'-
C' �

�I,.PESTICIIlESfPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) in m Ikg

4,4' ·DDD - ND 0.055 NO ND 3.0 13
� �O: '" ;:0-�P-t -�"' - -+--c "' O:; ';;-�-,-t- ...........�-�+-----i'i:-l
4,4'-DDif····· �······ ···· ND OO86 ND O .OI8 D 2.0 9.0
;;)i;:ODT ND 0.029 ND ND 2.0 8.0
-=-+--f, *_ _+--';"';-_ _I-_ _-;�+---_f:;;;
�hlordal1e ND 0.17 p ND 1.7 0.20 l.O
Dieldrin .. _.. ND 0.0055 Jp N'D:;:--_--
t O,- '" O. "'2,,8'-_;-:-t 0.040 0.20
�:c.
gamma-BHC(Lindanc) mm NO ND NO ---'_0°0 ., 0,,, 16,- JJ:..J.
D _ __ 0.40
� .......2,ll...
No other pesticides or PCBs detected.

Xi'£, �JETALS h'JlIg!"kg'-

,
' _.....
Arsenic __+-t; 1. 4 -- - 4.5 1.9 3.2 19 19
:;; -+ �
m�Cry1lium ND: 0.37 J 0.20 J NO 16 ' 140
��h!.��l,--___ NO 0.98 JI 1.1 J 78 78
9.�
"_____

Chromium .. _.. ___ 4.6__-t_� ;;--

1 7.9 6.7 NA NA
_
�

��-..---- 71.8 22.0 3,100 45,000

�
Lead 251 222 400 800
, 0.22 0.31 23 6$
J 11.9 7"0 J 7.0 J 1,600 23,000
Nil 4.9 H Nil NO 39Q 5,700
Zinc �
19.2 137 31.3 152 .......... 23,000 110.000
a c--s cd�lc �c�lc �e<c-l -�·······
f.7N"o"'o�tC"he �r�I1�,e�I-cl
Notes.
1. Allalytical results arc cOlllparoo to Ihc guidance values to the NJDEPr Residential and Non-Residential Direct ContactSoil Cle anup Criteria
pursuant to N J. A.C, 7:26D, lnst am ended on N o vembe r 4. 2009.
2. Bo ld type with light shading indicntcs the results exeeeds Residential Difl"Ct Contact Soil Cleanup Criteria
3, Bold l)'PC with Imedium sbading indicates the re:suHs excce<Js R csideJHial and Non-Residential Direct Contact Soil Cleanup Critcrm
Recoyery Qr RPD exceeds control lim its
B: Compound was found in the blank and sample.
J: Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal 10 the MO L and the concentration is an ap proxi ma te vaiuc.
p: The %RPD hctw\-"eo the: primary and continuation coluum/dcicdoris .40%. TIle lower value has been reported.
NA: Cliteria not established.
mglkg: Milligrams per Idiogram

-9-
Twin Bol'o Field: Dumont Borough June 16,20 10
Geotechnical Evaluation and Limited Ph,!se II ESA Report __� �_� . Page 10

The analysis of the samples from TB-I and TB-3 indicated the presence of semi-volatile organic
compounds and metals. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) pesticides, or PCBs were not detected above
the detection limit in these samples. Furtbermore, the concentrations of tlle SVOCs and metals were
determined to be well within the Residential and Non-residential Clean up Criteria and arc not a cause fOl'
regulatory concern or action.

The analysis of the sample from test boring TB-2 indicated the presence of semi-volatile organic
compounds, pesticides, and metals above laboratory detection limits. Volatile organic componnds (VOCs
were not detected above the detection limit in this sample. The concentrations reported lor
benzo(a)anthracenc, benzo(b )fiuroanthene, indeno( 1,2,3,-cd)pyrene were above the Residential Cleanup
Criteria and the concentration repotted for benzo(a)pyrene was above the Non-Residential Cleanup
Criteria.

The analysis of the sample from test boring TB-5 indicated the presence of semi-volatile organic
componnds (SVOCs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), pesticides, PCBs, and metals above
laboratory detection limits. In addition, the concentrations reported for benzo(a)pyrene and the pesticide
chlordane were above the Non-Residential Cleanup Criteria.

4.3 Discussion of Analytical Results

The analytical test results of the samples obtained from test borings TB-2 and TB-5 suggest that
the subsurface conditions associated with the observed organic materials have been impacted. The
analytical results of the samples colleeted of the organic materials indicate the following:

•
Benzo(a)anthracenc, bcnzo(b)fiuroanthene, indeno( 1 ,2,3,-cd)pyrcne arc present at
concentrations above the Residential Cleanup Criteria in one (TB-2) of the two samples
collected;

•
Benzo(a)pyrene is present at concentrations abovc the NOll-Residential Cleallup Criteria in
both samples.

•
Chlordane is present at concentratiolls above the Non-Residential Cleanup Criteria in one
(TB-5)of the two samples collected;

•
Other semi-volatile and priority pollutants are present in borings TB-2 and TB-5 at
cOllcentratiolls that are bclow the cleanup critel'ia but are above the detection limit.

Concentrations of contaminants that are above the NJDEP Cleanup Criteria must be repOited to
the NJDEP under the Site Remediation Reform Act (SRRA).

The fill material may be characterized as historic fill matel'ial pursuant to the NJDEP Technical
Requirements which is defined as "non-indigenous material, deposited to raise the topographic elevation
ofthe site, which was contaminated prior to emplacement and is in no way connected with the operations
at the location ofthe emplacement and which includes, without limitation, construction debris, dredge
spoils, incinerator residue, demolition debris, fly ash or non-hazardous solid waste."

- 10-
Twin Bora Field: Dumont Borough June Hi, 2010
Geo�e"ht1jcaL!�yaluf\JiQILal!!!1i!l1iteQJ'has�!tESA RSl101t __�_��__�_� _____�� _ l'!!ge I I

Tile Technica I Requirements provide limits based on the historic fi Il database at the NJDEP of
specific compounds. Table 3 compares the SVOCs concentrations reported on the Site with the Historic
Fill Database values repOlted in Appendix D of the Technical Requirements. As the Table indicates, all of
the onsite values are below the average reported in the historic fill database.

Tubie .>
Compul'isoll to Historic Fill Database

1. Hislol'h� database values are from Appendix D a/the NJDEP Requirements

2. Sire value shown is Ihe highest concentration reporfed/or samples fi'DlII TB�2 or TB�5;

4.4 A ddi t io nal Environmental Evaluation

The presence of contaminants above the accepted cleanup criteria triggers the need for further
onsite investigation. In accordance with NJDEP regulations, a Remedial Investigation (RI) is required to
delineate the vertical and horizolltal extent of contamination. This follow-up work can be done in an
expedited manner because the fililaycr of concern is relatively shallow. Geophysical methods may also
help define the limits of subsurface anomalies.

-1\-
 Geotechnical EvaluatiOlI and
Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment of
Twill Bora Field
BOI'ol/gll ofDUll/alit
Bergell COUllty, New Jersey

5.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

5.1 Limitations

5.1.1 Geotechnical Evaluation

The geotechnical evaluation was limited in scope and was intended to ascertain the general site
conditioos that are present on the Site. The number of borings was kept to a minimum since the purpose
was to characterize the general site conditions, A detailed geotechnical investigation would be necessary
pl'ior to detailed design of Site improvements.

5.1.2 Euvirollmental Evaluation

2J,2.1 Phase I ESA BackgrounQ

The Phase I ESA prepared for Twin Bol'o Park rep0l1ed that the Site had been used as an inter­
municipal sewage disposal facility in the 1950's and that when that use was terminated, the site was split
between Bergenfield and Dumont and eventually converted by the respective municipalities to
recreationalllse. An interview of a person knowledgeable of the site's history (Irwin Buchheister)
revealed that the site was repOltedly the subject of exteusive filling operations as shown by the following
excerpt:

Mr. Huchlleister recalls Ihal extensive waste disposal activilies occurred On the site after the sewage disposal use
was lerminated. Reporledly. tire sludge pils werefilled in will, aI/types of wasIe malerials. While the sludge pils
and filler bed were located on the eastern fringe of Ihe subject property, Mr. Buchheister recalls that the waste
disposal and fill activities occurred over much ofwhal is now occupied by tbe multi-purpose field and parking
101.

Based on this information, the Phase I ESA concluded that there was no evidence of recognized
environmental conditions in connection with the prope11y with the exception of "potentiai residual
contaminants associated with historic fill activities".

5.1.2.2 Limited Phase II ESA (Site Investigation)

The limited Phase II ESA was undertaken to ascertain the validity of the reported historic fill
activities on the site. The scope of the Phase II was to determine whether unsuitable materials were
present in the fill stratum and to determine the chemical composition of this material relative to accepted
soil cleannp criteria. The scope did not include defining the extent of any contamination, which typically
occurs in a Remedial Investigation, or undertaking any remedial action plans.

-12-
Twill Bora Field: Dumoll! Borough June 16,2010
GeoteelUlical Evaluation and LimiJed :rha�e lIES.... Re1)QfL! ___ ..__ .. __... __ .. _�. Pa !,w 13

5.2 Conclusions

5.2.1 Geotechn ical Evaluatiou

The key findings of the geotechnical evaluation can be summal'ized as follows:

•
The presence of granular fill material with trace debris and organics was confirmed over
the entire Twin Boro Field site ranging in depth from about three (3) to eight (8) feet
beneath tlte topsoil layer. The presence of fill is of concern from a stability standpoint
because of the unknown method of placement, the unknown condition of the subgrade
prior to placement, and the potential presence of unsuitable materials within the fill
stratum.

•
The granular fi II material was determined to be composed of a variety of materials and of
loose density. A layer of significant quantities of organic materials was observed in two of
the six borings a few feet below the surface. The differential settlement that has been
experienced ovcr the years is due to the fact that the fill was not placed in a controlled
manner and was not composed of suitable fill material.

•
Section 3 of this report identifies methods of reducing or eliminating the differential
settlement that has occurred, and will continue to occur, at this Site. These options have
been categorized as complete removal and replacement of the unsuitable material,
densification of the material, or continued periodic maintenance.

5.2.2 Limited I'hasc II ESA: Site Investigation

The key findings of the Phase II Site Investigation can be summarized as follows:

•
The laboratory analysis of samples collected from the fill layers where significant organic
materials were observed detected the presence of semi-volatile organic compounds
(SVOCs) above the NJDEP Residential and Non-Residential Direct Contact Soil Cleanup
Criteria. The elevated concentrations of SVOCs were fOllnd in one quadrant of tne
recreational field at a depth of at least 2 feet below the ground surface. There is no
indication that users of (he facility have been exposed to the contaminated fill.

•
The contaminated fill material appears to satisfy the definition of "historic fill" which is
fill material that was contaminated at the time of emplacement. The characterization of
the fill material as "historic fill" has significance with regard (0 remedial action
alternatives.

• Furthclmore, the analysis of the sample collected from one of the test borings detected
an elevated concentration of the pesticide chlordane which appears to be an isolated and
distinct Area of Concern.

Based on the observation of tile subsurface conditions and the analysis of samples collected
from test borings, it can be concluded that the fill material that was used when the site was changed
from a wastewater treatment facility to a recreational complex was contaminated prior to emplacement

-13-
Twin Bol'O Field: Dumont Borough June 16, 20 I0
Q!'�Q1ej:hnical i';yalul\tion !lnd Lim it,!! Ph;tJic 1l1lS� RePQlt�� ��_ �����
_ ��___ _ __��_ 1l.\gu'1

or was contaminated during emplacement and appears to satisfy the definition of "historic fill". These
fill activities occUlTed about 50 years ago. There is no indication that the subsurface conditions have
been impacted by actions during the intervening time.

The concentration of the detected contaminants in the fill material was found to be below the
average concentration reported in the NIDEP historic fill database presented in Appendix D of the
NIDEP Technical Requirements. This determination will need to be confirmed by additional analytical
data compiled during a remedial investigation of the Site. If the historic fill characterization is
confirmed, the person responsible for conducting the remediation of historic fill material shall do so
pursuant to NJ.A.C. 7:26£.6.2(d).

5.2.3 Areas of Concern

Based on the limited Phase II investigation, the Areas of Concern can be identified as follows:

I. Historic Fill. The filling activities that were reported in the Phase I ESA have been
confirmed by observations of split spoon samples and by the analysis of soil samples. The
nature and depth of the fill is variable across the site. Semi-volatile organic compounds were
detected in two of the four samples above the NIDEP Cleanup Criteria but below the
average concentration reported in the NIDEP historic fil[ database. A remedial investigation
is needed to determine the extent of the contaminated fill. It appears that the historic fill of
concern is a thin layer of material ranging in thickness fi'om 1-3 feet and in depth from 3 to 7
feet bgs.

2. Pe�sticit!l< disposal. The analysis of one of the four samples detected an elevated
concentration of the pesticide chlordane. Chlordane is an organochlorine compound that was
used as a pesticide in the U.S. until 1983. Because of concern about damage to the
environment and harm to human health, the (EPA) banned ail uses of chlordane in 1988. The
presence of a pesticide at the repOlted level is not typical of historic fil[ and may be due to
the disposal of a waste m aterial during the historic emplacement. The presence of this
contaminant is being treated as an Area of Conccl'l1 that is distinct from that of historic fill
remediation.

5.3 Recommendations

It is recommended that the following actions be undettaken to reduce the Borough's

environmental liability, to comply with applicable regulations, and to improve the recreational facility.

5.3.1 Environmental Reporting

The detection of contaminants above the Cleanup Criteria must be repOltcd to the NJDEP in
accordance with the Site Remediation Reform Act. The Alaimo Group will coordinate with the Borough
on the notification proccdure.

-14-
Twin Boro Field: Dumont Borough June 16, 2010
Geotechn icl\1 Evuluatio.l1 and Limited Phase II ESA Rcpo"'
rt'--- _______ Page 1 5

5.3.2 Re medial Investigation

The presence of contaminants and the identification of Areas of Concern necessitates that a
Remedial Investigation be undertaken to fully define the horizontal and vellical extent of the
contamination and the concentration of the contaminants. The need for a Remedial Investigation will
also require that all environmental reports be configured to fully adhere to the NJDEP Technical
Requirements.

I t is recommended that geophysical techniques be used to identify the extent of subsurface

anomalies and that a geoprobe be used to confirm the presence of organic contaminants. A geoprobe is
capable o f installing shallow probes and collecting samples of fi l l material i n a time efficient manner.
Samples should be collected within the fill area and used to define the horizontal and vertical extent of
the contamination. These methods arc suitable since the depth ofthe fill iayel' of concern ranges from 3
to 7 feet bgs.

5.3.3 Remedial Actioll

Once the extent of the contamination is fully defined, a remedial action wOfk plao will need to
be developed by the person responsible for the site remediation. The remedial action a lternatives may
range from the imposition of a deed restriction to enable site-specific use standards to the complete
removal and proper disposal o f tile contaminated materials. The factors that affect the selection of the
most suitable option are construction cost and the quality of the recreational fac i lity desired.

The remedial action that is to be selected will depend upon the results of the Remedial
Investigation; a final determination on whether the fi l l material can be characterized as h istoric fil l; and
a decision by the Borough on whether the recreational field should be upgraded concurrent with the site
remed iation. l fthe Borough decides to completely remove and replace the fi ll material in order to
establish a finn subgrade for the field, the contaminated material that is excavated would be d isposed of
at a suitable disposal faci l ity. The complete removal and replacement of unsuitable materials within five
(5) feet of the surface appears to be the most viable option from a geotechnieal and environmental
perspective but also the one with the h ighest eost.

In the event that the Borough chooses to remediate the site but not to make substantive
improvements to the recreational field, the use of institutional controls may be considered for the
historic fill provided that other Areas of Concern within the historic fill are remediated. In this regard,
the elevated concentration of the pesticide chlordane identified in the TB-2 sample would likely need to
be remediated. In this case, the remedial actions would entail continued periodic maintenance of the
field in response to selllement and the imposition of a deed restriction to enable the approval of site­
specific recreational use standards.

5.3.4 Restricted Use

It is recommended that a deed restriction be imposed on the property to enable the development
of a site-specific Recreational Land Use standard that more accurately reflects the risk to human health.
The site-specific standard would be less stringent than the Residential direct contact soil cleanuJl criteria
and would reflect the l'isk that call be reasonably attrihuted to the site conditions.

- 1 5-
 Geolecllllical Eva/llalioll alUl
Limited Pllase II Environmenlal Sile Assessmellt of
Twin Bom Field
Bomugh of Dllmolll
Bergen CO/lilly, New Jersey

APPENDIX A

Boring Logs
 DUFFIELD
ASSOCIATES TEST BORING TB-1
Cons!J/rants in tho Geosciences (Page f of f)

Geotechnical and Environmen!al Dale Started : May 12, 2010 Olinng £qu:pmenl : Truck�mounted Mobile B·5�

Consulting ServiO)s Dale Completed : May 12, 2010 Oliliing Methods : SPT (ASTM 01586, HSA)

Tw; n 8oro fie ld logged by : BJS

Borough of Du mon !, New Jersey 'A'eather : Rain, 50's

Pro ject No. 8387.GBiEC .... � Exc, Con[(actoI ; Mike Granese!Gfa��se Drilling, Inc.
......
Sample Coodllian Waler Levels
_� During ExcaVation

0 � Augers.at 10 ft
: Layer I
�<:J
Depth
Sample
in DePtn
Number Remarks
feel rect DESCRIPTION
i

(f�:
0
0.3 14 inches)
Fill: Brown fine to medium sand. some to fittle silt,
8-1
trace gravel, trace debffS {e.g" crushed stone, organics)

\
�
'
2 20 - --- - - - -- - -- ----- -- - --- -

Poss,ble Fill· Orange-brown fine 10 medium SAND,

S-2 0.0
trace silt, trace gravel

• F·· SP

r .. ( SAME S-3 0.0

a 6.0 Pi'i+l---, ----·�·----·--· �·------ --i

Red, brown SilT, some 10 little fine to mediu m sand.

SAA 0.0
trace gravel
Ml
a
0.0
S-5A
8-5B

10

0_0

12

I
Cl
Red etAY, liUle sil!, trace fine to coarse sand 8-6

0.0
1.

�ia
18 16.0 � NU RECOVERY-
--- ------- - ---
13-7

20

i
22
•
NOTES;
1. 8orin9 t e rminated approximately 18,0 feet belO'N existing grQund $urrace (b.e.g.s,)
2, Wet on Spoon encountered al ap proxlmal e:fy 7,6 reel b.e.g.s.
3, Waler level at approximately 8.0 ree:tb,e,Il.S. wilh augers at 10 feel b,e,s}-s.
4, Boring grouted and capped with soll cuttings following dlilling,
 DUFFIELD
ASSOCIATES TEST BORING TB-2
Consultants in Uu: Geosciences (Page 1 of 1)

Geotechnical and Environmental Dale Started : May 12,20:10 Drilling Equipment : Truck-mounted Mobile 8,59

Consulting Services Date Compleled : May 12,2010 Drilling Methods : SPT (ASTM 01586, HSA)
Twin Bora Fleld Logged by : BJS

Borough of Dumont. New Jersey Wealher : Rain, 50's

Project No. 8387.0BIEC Exc. Conlfactor : Mjke GranesefGranese Dolling, Inc.

: Sample CondiVon Waler Levels

..I.. During Excavation

Deptn Layer
•
in Depth
feel feel DESCRIPTION
o
I r 5 InCneS)
0.4
Fill: Red-brown, black fine sand. some silt, trace
·

gravel, trace coarse to medium sand

·

2•
" :xs:
0.0
SAME S·2A
.'

"
3.3 � --
I} t'UI: B rown. Ian fine to medium SAND, some S·28
' silt, trace gravel, trace medium t o coarse sand 0.0
4 .
:,1 SM
SAME (wet) S·3A 0.0 16.4 30.1
·
' .Ii
·
5.0
"

, � - � FilfSrown,red flnetomedium SAND and

S·38 0.0
·
SM • Sl l , trace fine gravel
6 6.0 .. r---------------------------
..:.\:.
_'. '/':: Possible Fill: Black fine to medlum SAND, some
SP SA 0.0
organics (e.g., roots), HUle silt
<:\-;:
8 6.0 ::2c- - --NO RECOVERY- -
-
- - - - - - ..
S·5

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

NOTES: surface,
1. Boring terminated approximately 10.0 feet oolow ex/sling ground surface (!.i.e.g.s.) 5, After approximately 1 hout the hOle was observed to be approximately 15 inches in
2. Wet on Spoon encountered at approximalety 5.0 (€ill !.i.e.g.s. diameter at the ground surlaoo
3. Groundwater not observed during drilling. 6. Boring backt1l!ed with auger cuUiogs and stOCkpiled sand obtained from Borough 0'
4. Auger hole appeared 10 enlarge during drHling . Hole approxlmatety 12 Inches In Dumont
diameler atSl.lrface and approximately 15 inches In diameter oonealh the ground
 ;" DUFFIELD
""" ASSOCIATES TEST BORING TB-3
Consultants in the Geosciences (Pag. 1 of 1)

Geotechnical and Environmental Date Slarted : May 12, 2010 DrlHing Equipment : Truck�molJnted Mohl!e 8·59

ConsulUog Servicos Da!e Completed : May 12, 2010 Drilling Methods ' SPT (ASTM 015S8, HSA)
T....in Boro f!eld t09ged by : BJS

Borough of Dumont, NO\v Jersey Weather ; Rain, SO's

Project No, e357,GBIEC Exe. Contractor ; Mike GraneselGranese Drilling, Inc:.

Sample CondItion Water levels

1 DUling EXcalJation

5L.. At completion

'" 1 Augers 316ft

Depth layer :c
in Deplh � Sample PID
(d.u.) Remarks
feet � Number
feei
C) DESCRIPTION
o
"": '' I ti ,ncnes)
.
0.5, �
FILL: BlOwn-orange fine kl. medium sand, ....... little to trace
slit, trace debris (e.g., wife ln�"I�ti;"';'\ . S-1 0.0

2 2.0
. ' 1---+---------------.---.- ------
Possible Fill: Brown fine SAND. sam. sill. trace S-2 19.4 25.4
SM
medIum to coarse sand

20

22 ,
NOTES:
1. Borinl) lermlnated approximately 17.0 feel below exlsling ground surface (b.e.g.s.)
2, Wet on Spoon encol.lntered al approximalely 4.8 reel b.e.g.s.
3, Water level at approximately 5.2 feet b.e.g.s. with augers al 5.0 feel b.e.g.s..
4. Upon completion, weier leve! obseNed at approximalely 5.2 feel b.e.g.s,
5, Boring grouted and capped with soil cuLtfngs following drill:ng.
 DUFFIELD
ASSOCIATES TEST BORING TB-4
Consultants in the Geosciences
----�-..... -=---=-�--�--="--�'�-c'-
(page 1 of 1)
Dale Started : May t2, 2010 Drilling Equipment . Truck-mounted Mobile 8-59
Geo1ecnnlcal and Environmental
Consulting Ser vices Date Comple1ed : May 12, 2010 Drilling Methods SPT (ASTM DfSS6, HSA)

; BJS
.

Twin Boro �le!d logged by

BorQugh of Dumont, New Jersey Weather : Rain. 50's

-"'I--"p':l:;ej' =�:1 :;::
N' O''':8'':: :�BI
: 'G:: ''::':'
3 a:7:
'1 -- - - - -
Exc. Contraclor ; Mike Granese/Granese Drilling, Inc.

r:
I

I I
mP I e C Q OOjlJon : Waler leve!s !
1 During EXcavation

! !
i
iii
layer, �I �
--.1!_ Augels at 10 ft -'
•

i
.
Depth
PtD Moisture
i en:
--- Sa'l1plQ Percent I
in Depth ���

�
:�

[i }
Number (d.".) Conlant Passing: Remarks
...._-- --

feet teet a:.:: ...

C> :::> DESCRIPTION (%) 200Sievo,

:::t
:, : == ::;!��
5' L""
-oo:jr--O-i �::i � nen; ch; to;:;'�� di= um= =S=A=N·D·=.=Iit=1t .= \=:=-==== ==�=�== =�==t===
c---

·;;;ib��L F:�P�:�:� r::��:TnCfii

..

trace silt, trace fine grave! 8-1 0.0

2
1:":
SAME, little sill S-2 0.0

4
SP
PossibTe Fill: Orange-brown fine to medium SAND, little
to trace silt (moist)
0.0
S-3A

6 •
Possible FiIr: Blacl< fine fo medium SAND, trace silt 5-36
0_0

Brown-tan, yellow fine to medium SAND, trace silt S-4

1'':.,/
0.0

8 8,0 ... .� ---- ----.- .--- --- •. .---

Brown"orange, Ted fine to medium SAND, some sm. S-5

trace clay (wet)
10
Q,O

12

:j
14 SM Brown-gray SAME, trace fine gravel S-6
'' ,,
0.0
16

18 -

Red�brow(\ SAME, tittle coarse sand S-7

20 --i 20,0

22
NOTES:
______ ..... ___ " �_ _ _..l.._ _ ___ '-- __ .1...
___ 1 _ .... -.L.-----'---1
1. Boring tennlnated approxl<fialoiy 20,0 feel be!ow existing ground surface (b.e.g.s.)
2. Vltel on Spoon encountered at approxImately 7.5 feel b.e.g.s.
3. Water leve! at approximately 8J) feet tUMP. with augers at 10.0 te el b,e .g.s.
4. Boring grouted and capped with $(};! cuttings !ol:O'Ning drilling.
 DUFFIELD
ASSOCIATES TEST BORING TB-5
Consullants in the Geosciences (Page 1 of 1)

Geotcchl1ical and Environmental t

Date S arted : May 12,2010 Drilling Equlpmen-I -: -Tr-u-kc -·-�'Uflted Mob'le 13-59····�
Consulting SI)Nices Date Completed ; May 12, 2010 Drilung Methods : $p r (ASTM D1586.I"iSA)
Twin 130ro Field Logged b y : BJS

Borough of DumoC\� New Jersey Weather ; Rain, 50's

/-__,-_ project No. 6387,GB/EC __ ECX . .::C.o.
:: C"Ia
r c!or : .. Mke Grane$efGr�.� ese Orrlling, Inc.
_-=::: :. �::�
__

i
i Sample Condition Water levels
� During Excavallon

SL AI completion

0 1 Augers at 10 1t
i' Moist ure
tii
Oepth layer
"- Sample P1D Porcent
in Depth ---_ ....-

Number (ct.u.) Content Passing

fee t feel
DESCRIPTION :
(!) (%i 200 Sieve

O:"I; L".1"".P1'£oxlmately 5ln9hes)

0
0.4
t:.:r.'. ... .
""V! +r�.;;o';-p"S "; .... : 0.0
�ILl:
__

B(own-orange fine sand, some sill, trace medium ,

to coarse sand, trace gravel, trace debris (e.g" organics, i S-l 0.0 11.3 28.7
coal fragments)
2 0.0
Brown fine sand, gome sill, little medium sand S-2A

S-28
ORGANICS (e.g., roots, leaves)
'# ,H --- - - ------------------ --

4 4.0

NO RECOVERY 8-3 0.0

ML
Gray�white clayey SILT, ftace fine to medium and, s S-4 0.0 23.4 69.7
- trace coarse sand

6
:\E
- Red-brown clayey SILT, trace fine sand (W<lI) 5-5 24.1 94.0
..
- -- - -------
... -- ----
10 10.0
-_ ----�,-.
.

12

14

16

18

20�
2
2
f--_
NOTES:
�LI. ___ L-
1. Bering term inated �pproxlmately 10 feel below existing ground surface (b.e.g.s.)
at
2. Wet on Spoon encountered approximately 8.1 feet b.e.g,$.
3. Water level at approximale/y 8.5 (eel b.e.g,$. wah augers at 10 feel b.a.9.s.
at
4. Upon comp le tion , water level observed approximately 8.3 reel p.e.g.s.
5. Borfng grouted and capped Vwith soil uc t11fl,9s following drililng. I
�... -------

DUFFIELD
ASSOCIATES TEST BORING TB-6
Consultants in the Geosciences (Page 1 of 1)
-
: Truct;-mounted MobHe 8·59
�---�-
Geotechnlcal and Environmental Date Started : May 12, 2010 Drilling Equipment
SPT (ASTM 01566, HSA)
.
Consulting Services Date Completed : May 12, 2010 Drilling Melhods

Twln Boro Fjeld Logged by BJS

.
Borough of Dumont, New Jersey Weather Rain, 50's

Project No. 8387.GB/EC Exc.Contf3ctor - Mike GraneselGranese Drilling, Inc.

Sample Condition Water Levers

.J... Du r ing Excavation

....sL. At rornpleUon

U �v... AUgers at 10 fi
Depth layot J: Pl 0 Moisture Percent
if) Sample
In Depth
U (d.n.)
fee! feel �
(!)
Vl
::;;
DESCRIPTION
Number Content
('%.)
Passing
200 Si';;.
Remarks

0"
- ,w·:· TOPSOIL (approximately 6 inches)""
05 : '.' ; 0.0
- '.,") :
" .- ..
';' ':
2 - :i ::. " Possible Fill: Brown-red tine to medium SAND, little silt S-l 0.0
"
...., '; SM

Possible Fill: Brown-orange fine to medium SAND,

4 8-2 0,0 15,5 22.1
some slit, trace coarse sand, trace grave!

:' ---�+-�--�-�----
Black, fed fine to medium SAND, mUe sm, liUle fine to
8-3 0,0
medium gravel

6 Brown fine SAND, little medium sand. ffUle silt S·4 0,0

10 Brown. red, �Iack nne to medium SAND, lillie sHi (wei) S-5

0,0
: "
':.., .
" '
12
"
.. ; SM
; ... �',
'.
'. Red-brown nne to medium SAND, lillio clayey sill, lillie
14 S-6
fine to medrum gravel, trace coarse sand

- :. '.'
0.0
18

�
"
18

", SAME, tlace fine gravel S-7

c·

20 - -----------------�-,-j

22 • •

NOTES:
1, 80riog temlinated appfOximataly 20.0(eet be!ow exisUng ground suIface {b.e.g.s.)
2. VVet on Spoon enccuntered at approximately SA foot b.e.g.s.
3. water level at approximately 9.0 feet b.e.!:}.s.wilh augers at 10 feel b.e.g.s.
-1. Upon completion, walet level observed at approximately 8.7 feet b.e.9.s.
5. Boring grouted and capped wjth SOtl cuttings 'o!lowlng drllling.
 Geotecllllical Evaltltltioll a/l(l
Limited Phase II Ellvirolllllellfal Site Assessment of
Twill Boro Field
Borollgh ofDurnrmt
Bergen COI/llty, New Jel'lIey

APPENDIX B

Laboratory Data Deliverables

 ANALYTICAL REPORT

Job Number: 460-13139-1

Job Description: Dumont Fields - Twin Boro

For:
Duffield Associates
5400 Limestone Road
Wilmington, DE 19808

Attention: Mr. Bradley Summerville

ApPfC)l.wfone\eue,
Jam",C,>"lci
ProjectM"".,-1
1i/3I2()10355 PM

Jamie Capaci
Project Manager I
jamie.capaci@testamericainc.com
06/03/2010

The test results in this report meet all NELAP requirements unless specified within the case narrative. Pursuant to
NELAP, this report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. All questions
regarding this report should be directed to the TestAmerica Edison Project Manager.

TestAmerica Edison Certifications and Approvals: Connecticut: CTDOH #PH-0200, New Jersey: NJDEP (NELAP)
#12028, New York: NYDOH (NELAP) #11452, NYDOH (ELAP) #11452, Pennsylvania: PADEP (NELAP) 68-00522 and
Rhode Island: RIDOH LA000132

TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.

TestAmerica Edison 777 New Durham Road, Edison, NJ 08817
Tel (732) 549-3900 Fax (732) 549-3679 �l\w'.tesla,r:!.leri�;&QG.,�Qm

Page 1 of 623 06/03/2010

 Table of Contents
Cover Title Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .... .. 1

Data Summaries. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. 6

Report Narrative.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . ..... ... . . .. . .. . . . . .... 6

Sample Summary. . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .... .. . . 8

Executive Summary. . . . . ... . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

Method Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . . ... .. ... . . .. 12

Method I Analyst Summary. . . . .... . . . . . ..... . .... . . . .... . . . . . ... .. 13

Sample Datasheets . . . . .. . ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... .. . . . . .. . . ... ...

,
14

Surrogate Summary. ... ... . .. . . . ... .. . . . . . .. . . ... . . ..... . . . .. . .. . 62

QC Data Summary. .. ... . . . . . . . . ... . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ... .. 66

Data Qualifiers. . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . . .. .... .... . .. ... 95

QC Association Summary. . ... . . ... . . . .. .. . .. . .. . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . .. 97

Lab Chronicle. . . . ... .. . ... . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .... .. 101

Organic Sample Data. . . . . . .. . . . ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. 106

GC/MS VOA. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . ... . . . . . ... . .. . .... . . .. 106

Method 82608 .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . ... . .... .... . . .. .. ............... 106

Method 82608 QC SummaI)' ........... ...... .

107
" " .

........
Method 82808 Sample Data
114
Standards Data
142
Method 82608 ICAL Dala ..
142
Method 82608 CCAL Data ....
154
Raw QC Data " . . .... . .
157
Method 8260B Tune Data
157
Method 82608 Blank Dala , , ,
165
• • . . , • . . . .

Method 82608 lGSItGSD Data

171
• . . . . . . . • • • . . .

Method 8260B Run logs.

185

Page 2 of 623 06/03/2010

 Table of Contents
Method 8260B Prep Dala
187
• • • . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • . •

GC/MS Semi VOA.............................................. . 189

Method 8270C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . .
189
Method 8270C QC Summary ... ,
190
Method 8270C Sample Data, .
202
Standards Data
298
. • . . . , , . . . •

Method 8270C ICAl Dala...

298
Melhod 8Z70C CCAl Dala ..
309
RawQC Data
312
. . • , '

Method 8270C Tune Oata ,

312
Method 8270C Blank Du!a
320
• .

Method 8270C lCSllCSD Data

329
. . • . . . • • • • . . .

Method 8270C MSiMSD Data.. . .

336
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • .

Method S27DC Run Logs. . . .

340
. . . . . . . . . .

MethodB270C Prop Dale ,

342
_ . . . • . . . . , . ' " , • • • " . . . . _ . . .

GC Semi VOA...... , , . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . , , ... . . . . .

344

Method 8081 A . . . . . . . , , . . . • . . . . , . . . . . . , . • . , , . . . , . . . .
. . . . , , , . . , , . . . . . . . . . .
344
Method 8OS1A QC Summary .......
345
.

Molhod 8081A Sample Data .....

360
Slandards Data.
389
Method SOB1A [CAl Dala .
389
Method 8081A PEM Dala .
409
Method 8081A CCAl Dala .
417
RawQC Data .................
425
.

Method 8081 A Blank Data

425
_ . . • .

Method 8081A lCSILCSD Dala ..

431

Page 3 of 623 06/03/2010

 Table of Contents
Method8081AMSIMSD Data
441
Method B081ARun Logs ............... . ....... .... 445

Method808tA Prep Data.

448

Method 8082 . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
450
Method8082 QC Summary • • • • • . . . . . . . .
........... 451

Method8002 Sample Deta .............

464
.

Standards Data ........... , , . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . ........................ 488

Method8082 ICAl Data... .. . . . . . . . . . • . . . • • . • . • . • . . • • . . . . . • • . • • . • • • . . • • • • . . . . • •

488
Method8082 CCAL Oat. . • . . . . • . . • . . . • • • • . . . . • . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . • . • . • • • • . . . • • . . ... . . 538
Raw QC Data. . .. . . . . . ...... . . . . . .
546
. • • • • . . . . . . . . . • • • • • . . . . • • . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . • . • .

Method8082 Blank Data

546
. . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . • . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Method8082 LCSILCSD Data.......

552
.

Method8082 MSIMSD Data

563
. . . . . . . . . . . . • . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . • • • • . . . . . .

Method8082 Run Logs

567
. . • . . . . . . . . .

Melhod8082 Prep Daia . .. , ......... ............... . ......... 570

.
. . , _ . _ . . . . . _ " , . . . .

Inorganic Sample Data ...................... . .............. 572

Metals Data ..... ......... ........................ ............. .

572

Met Cover Page ............................................. ............. 573

Met Sample Data ........................................................ .

574

Met QC Data . . . . • . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
578
MellCVICCV ............. ............
578
. • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • . . . . . .

Met Blanks, .
580
Met ICSAlICSAB ....
584
Mel MSIMSDIPDS
588
• • • • . • . . .

Met Duplicates, . ,
589
. . . . . . .

Mel LCSfLCSD ........................................ . . .

590
" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page 4 of 623 06/03/2010

 Table of Contents
Mel Serial Dilution
592
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Met MDL . . ..... . ... .. . . . . .. . . .. . .. ... . ... .. . . ..... . .. .. . .... .. ...... . ..

593

Met Linear Ranges . .. .. ... ... . .. . ... . . ... .... . .. . . . . .. . .... .... . .. . ... .... 595

Met Preparation Log ... . . . . . .. .. ... ... .. .... ... . . . . . .. . . . ... ..... . . . .... .. 596

Met Analysis Run Log . . . . . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ... .... . . .. . . . . . . . . . .

598

Met Prep Data . . .. . . .. . . . . . . ...... . . .. .. ... .. . .. ... . . . . . . . . .. ... .. .. . .. . . 600

General Chemistry Data..................... . ................... . 603

Gen Chern Cover Page .................................................... 604

Gen Chern MDL .... ... .... . ...... .. .. . . .... . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. .... . . . 605

Gen Chern Analysis Run Log . . ... .. . . ... . .. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . ... 606

Gen Chern Prep Data .. .. . . ... .. . . . . ...... . ... . .. ...... . .... .. . . . ......... 61 3

Shipping and Receiving Documents.. .. .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .. . .. 621

Client Chain of Custody. . .. . . . . . . ... . ... . .... . ... . . .. . .... . ..... .. 622

. Sample Receipt Checklist. . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . ... .. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 623

Page 5 of 623 06/03/2010

 CASE NARRATIVE

Client: Duffield Associates

Project: Dumont Fields - Twin Boro

Report Number: 460·13139·1

form of an exception report, where only the anomalies related to this report, method specific performance
This case narrative is in the
and/or QAJQC issues are discussed. If there are no issues to report, this narralive will include a statement that documents that there are
no relevant data Issues,

It should be noted thai samples wilh elevated Reporting limits (RLs) as a result of a dilution may not be able to satisfy customer reporting
limits in some caSes. Such increases in the Rls are unavoidable but acceptable consequence of sample dilution that enables
quan1lflcation of target analytes or Interferences which exceed the calibraUon railge of the inslrument.

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoId round�off errors in carculated resulls.

Ail holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these sampres, unless otherwise detailed in the
indlvfdual sections below.

RECEIPT
The samples were recefved on 05/13/2010: Ihe samples arrived fn good condmon, properly preserved and on ice, The temperature of the
coolers a t receipt was 3.3 C.

Nole: AI! samples whlcil require thermal preservation are considered acceplable if the arrival femperalure Is wilhin 2C of the required
temperalure or method specified range. For samples with a specffied temperature of 4C, samples with a temperature ranging from just
above freezfng temperature of water to 6C shall be acceptable. Samples Dmt are hand delivered immediately following collecUon may not
moo l lhese criteria, however they wW be deemed acceptable according to NELAC standards. if there is evidence that the chilling process
has begun. such as anival on ice, 131(;.

TOTAL METALS
Samples 460-13139-2. 460-13139-4, 460-13139-5 and 460-13139-7 were analyzed for total metals i n accordance with EPA SW.s46
Method 6010B. The samples were prepared on 0511412010 and analyzed on 0511812010.

The matrix splke(MS) recoveries for antimony in batch 37477 was outside control llmits. The associated laboralory control sample (lCS)
recovery met acceptance criteria ,

Samples 460-1313S-2(4X). 460-13139-4(4X). 460-13139-5(4X) and 460-13139-7(4X) reGuired dilution prior 10 analysis. The reporting
limits have been adjusted accordingly.

As a standard practice all soil samples and reiated QC sample� (i.e MS. leS, Dup, MS, SO) are diluted 2X�4X prior to analysis. Furthor
••

dilulions may be required dependent upon anaiyte levels in the samples. Refer to the analytical rasults forms for dilutions,

No other difficulties were encountered during the metals analyses,

All other quality control parameters were Within the acceptanco Ilmlts,

TOTAL MERCURY
Samples 460-13139-2, 460-13139-4, 460-13139-5 and 460-13139-7 were analyzed for total mercury- 1n accordance with EPA SWM846
Method 7471A, The samples were prepared and analyzed on 05114/2010.

No difficulties were encountered during the mercury analyses.

All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES
Samples 460-13139-2. 460�13139-4. 460�1313S�5 and 460·1313S�7 were analyzed for organochlorine pesticides in accordance with EPA
SW-846 Melhod a081A The samples were prepared on 05f14/2010 and analyzed on 05117/2010.

DeB surrogate recovery for the following sampJe(s) was outside control Itmlts: 460�131394 on the primary column. Evidence of matrix
interference Is present; therefore, re�extracUon and/or fe-analysis was not performed.

No other difficullies were encountered during the pesticides analyses,

All other quality control parameters were w1thin the acceptance limits,

Page 6 of 623 06/03/2010

POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS)
Samples 460-13139-2, 460-13139-4, 460-13139-5 and 460-13139·7 were analyzed for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in accordance
with EPA SW-846 Method 8082. The samples were prepared and analyzed on 05/14/2010.

No difficulties were encountered during the PCBs analyses.

All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GC-MS)

Samples 460-13139-2, 460-13139-4, 460-13139-5 and 460-13139-7 were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (GC-MS) in
accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8260B. The samples were prepared on 05/14/2010 and analyzed on 05/18/2010.

No difficulUes were encountered during the volatiles analyses.

All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

SEMIVOLATILE ORGAN(C COMPOUNDS (GC-MS)

Samples 460-13139-2, 460-13139-4, 460-13139-5 and 460-13139-7 were analyzed for semlvolatile organic compounds (GC-MS) in
accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8270C. The samples were prepared on 05/17/2010 and analyzed on 05118/2010.

The laboratory control sample (LCS) for balch 37564 was oulstde conlrol limits for the following analyte: Benzidine.

The matrix spike I matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) precision for batch 37564 was outside control limits for Benzidine.

The matrix spike I matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) recoveries for batch 37564 were outside conlrollimits for 2,4-Dinilrophenol,
4,6-01nitro-2-melhylphenol and Benzidine.

No other difficulties were encountered during the semivolaliles analyses.

All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

PERCENT SOLIDS
Samples 460-13139-1 through 460-13139-8 were analyzed for percent solids in accordance with ASTM 02974-87 Modified. The samples
were analyzed on 05/14/2010 and 05/1712010.

No difficulties were encountered during the % solids analyses.

All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

Page 7 of 623 06/03/2010

 SAMPLE SUMMARY

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

DatelTime DatefTime
lab Sampte ID Client Sample ID Client Matrix Sampled Received

460-13139-1 T8-3 2-3 Soil 05/1212010 0900 05/13/2010 1830

460-13139-2 T8-36-7 Soil 05/1212010 0945 0511312010 1830
460-13139-3 TB-2 2-3 Soil 05/1212010 1030 0511312010 1830
460-13139-4 TB-2 5-6 Soil 05/1212010 1045 0511312010 1830
460-13139-5 TB-1 2-3 Soil 05/12/2010 1125 05/13/2010 1830
460-13139-6 TB-1 5-6 Soil 0511212010 1145 05/1312010 1830
460-13139-7 T8-53-4 Soil 0511212010 1230 0511312010 1830
460-13139-8 T8-46-7 Soil 0511212010 1340 0511312010 1830

TestAmerica Edison

Page 8 of 623 06/03/2010

 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY· Detections

Clieni: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460·13139·1

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Reporting

Analyle Result J Qualifier Limit Un i ts Method

460·13139·1 18.32·3

Percent Moisture 17.9 1.0 % MOisture

Percent Sol1ds 82.1 1.0 % Moisture

460·13139·2 18-36·7

Benzota]anthracene 28 J 41 ug/Kg 8270C

Bis(2·ethylhexyl) phthalate 120 J 410 ug/Kg 8270C
Arsenic 1.9 1.2 mg/Kg 6010B
Beryllium 020 J 0.46 mglKg 601 0B
Chromium 9.1 2.3 mglKg 60108
Copper 13.9 5.8 mglKg 6010B
Lead 1 7.5 1.2 mglKg 6010B
NlcI<el 7.0 J 9.3 mglKg 6010B
Zinc 31.3 7.0 mglKg 60108
Percenl; Moisture 1 8.8 1.0 % Moisture
Percent Solids 81.2 1.0 % Moisture

460·13139·3 18·22-3

Percent Moisture 13.9 1.0 % Moisture

Percent Sollds 86.1 1.0 % Moisture

TestAmerica Edison

Page 9 of 623 06/03/2010

 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Detections

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number; 460-13139·1

Lab Sample ID Client Sample 10 Reporting

Analyle Result I auallfier Limit Units Method

4 60 ·131 3904 18·25·6

Acenap/lU1ylene 97 J 380 ugfKg 8270C

Aoonaphthene 110 J 380 ug/Kg 8270C
Fluorene 150 J 380 ug/Kg 8270C
Phenanthrene 1500 380 uglKg 8270e
Anthracene 240 J 380 uOiKg 8270e
Fluoranthene 1800 380 uglKg 8Z70e
Pyrena 1500 380 uglKg aZ70e
Benzo[a]anthracene 710 38 ugIKg 8Z70e
Chrysene 9 60 380 uOiKg aZ70e
Bis(2·ethylhexyl) phthalate 2 10 J 380 uglKg 8270e
Benzo[b]fluoranlhene 820 38 uglKO 8270e
8enzo(k)fluoranthone 300 38 ug/Kg 8270e
Benzo[alpyrono 690 38 ug/Kg 8270C
Indeno!1,2,3-cdJpyrene 610 38 uglKg a210e
Dibenz{a,h)anthracene 130 38 ug/Kg 8210C
B enzo{g,h,i)perylene 6BO 380 ug/Kg 8270C
Chfordane 1 10 p 71 ug/Kg BOB 1A
4,4'-DDD 55 1.1 ug/Kg 80B1A
4,4"DDE 8.6 P 7.1 ug/Kg 80B1A
4,4'-DDT 29 7.7 ug/Kg B08 t A
Oleldrin 5.5 Jp 7.7 ug/Kg aOB1A
Arsenic 45
. 1.1 mg/Kg 6010B
Beryllium 0.37 J 0.46 mg/Kg 601 DB
Cadmium 0.98 J 1.1 mg/Kg 6010B
Chromium 17.9 2.3 mg/Kg 6010B
Copper 71.8 S.l mglKg 6010B
lead 2 51 11
. m OiKo 6010B
Nickel 11.9 9.2 mg/Kg 6010B
SiNer 4.9 B 23
. mglKg 6010B
Zinc 137 6.9 mglKg 6010B
Mercury 0.22 0.035 mglKg 1471A
Percent Moisture 12.B 10
. % Moisture
Percent Solids 87.2 1.0 % Moisture

460·13139·5 18-1 2-3

A rseni c 1.4 1.0 mglKg 6010 B

Chromium 46
. 2.8 mglKg 6010 8
Copper 7.2 5.0 m o lKo 6010B
lead 7.9 1.0 molKo 6010B
Nickel 5.4 J 8.1 mg/Kg 6010B
Zinc 1 9 .2 6.1 mg/Kg 6010B
Percent Moisture 6 .5 10
. % MoIsture
Percent SOlids 93.5 10
. % MOIsture

TestAmerica EdisQrt

Page 10 of 623 06/03/2810

 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Detections

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Lab Sample ID Client Sample 10 Reporting

Analyte Result I Qualifier limit Units Method

460-13139-6 T8-1 5·6

Percent Moisture 11.9 1.0 % Moisture

Percent Solids 88.1 1.0 % Moisture

460·13139-7 T8·53-4

Acenaphthene 200 J 860 ug/Kg 8270C

Fluorene 440 J 860 ug/Kg 8270C
Phenanthrene 1800 860 ug/Kg 8270C
Anthracene 260 J 860 ug/Kg 8270C
Ftuoranthene .1300 860 ug/Kg 8270C
Pyrene 790 J 860 ug/Kg 8270C
Benzo[a1anlhracene 380 86 ug/Kg 8270C
Chrysene 560 J 860 ug/Kg 8270C
Bis(2-ethythexytj phthatate 190 J 860 ug/Kg 8270C
8enzo[b]f\uoranthene 590 86 ug/Kg 8270C
Benzolk]fluoranthene 230 86 ug/Kg 8270C
Benzo[a]pyrene 4 10 86 ug/Kg 8270C
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 4 60 86 ug/Kg 8270C
Benzo[g ,h,IJperylene 460 J 860 ug/Kg 8270C
gamma-BHe (Lindane) 16 Jp 17 ug/Kg 8081A
Chlordane 1700 170 ug/Kg 8081A
4,4'-ODE 18 P 17 ug/Kg 8081A
Dieldrin 28 17 ug/Kg 8081A
Arsenic 3.2 2.5 mg/Kg 6010B
Cadmium 1.1 J 2.5 mg/Kg 6010B
Chromium 6.7 5.1 mg/Kg 6010B
Copper 22.0 12.7 mg/Kg 6010B
Lead 222 2.5 mg/Kg 6010B
Nickel 7.0 J 20.4 mg/Kg 6010B
Zinc 152 15.3 mg/Kg 6010B
Mercury 0.31 0.082 mg/Kg 7471A
Percent Moisture 61.5 1.0 % Moisture
Percent Solids 38.5 1.0 % Moisture

460-13139-8 TB-4 6-7

Percent Moisture 16.3 1.0 % Moisture

Percent Solids 83.7 1.0 % Moisture

TestAmerica Edison

Page 11 of 623 06/03/2010

 METHOD SUMMARY

Client: Duffield Assoclales Job Number: 460-13139-1

OescripUon lab location Method Preparation Method

Matrtx: Solid

Volatile O rganic Compounds (GCIMS) TALEOI SW8468260B

Closed System Purge and Trap TALEDI S W8465035

Semlvolallfe Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass TAL EDI SW846827 0C

Speclromelry (GCIMS)
Aufomated Soxh!et Extraction TALEDI SW846354 1

Organochlorine Pesticides (GG) TALEDI SW8461lO81A

Automated Soxhlel Extraction TALEDI SW8463541

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography TALEDI SW8468082

Automated SQxhlet Extraction TALEDI SW8463541

Metals (ICP) TALEDI SW8466010B

Propardtion, Metals TALEDI SW8463 050B

Mer<:<'ry (CVM) TAL EDI SW8467471A

Preparation, Mercury TALEDI SW8467471A

Percent Moisture TAL EDI EPA Moisture

Lab Reference.:

TALEDl TestArner'ica Edison

Method References:

EPA;;:;; US Envfronmental Protecllon Agency

SW846= "'Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, PhyslcaUChemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986And Its Updates.

TcstAmerica Edlsof'i

Page 12 of 623 06/03/2 010

 METHOD I ANALYST SUMMARY

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139·1

Method Analyst Anal yst 10

SW846 8 260B Boykln, Kenneth KB

SW846 8270e Zhao, Chunxin CZ

SWB46 BOB1A Manfangit, Ferdie FM

SWB46 8082 Diaz, Carol B CSO

SW846 6010B Chang, Chum DSf eDC

SWB46 7471A Sheikh. Relia 8 RBS

EPA Moisture D ave Virendra

, VD

TestAmerica Edison

Page 13 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associales Job Number: 460-13139-1

C l ient Sample 10: TB-36-7

Lab Sample 10: 460-13139-2 Dale Sampled: 05/1212010 0945

Client Matrix: Soil % Moisture: 18_8 Date Received: Q5f13/2010 1830

8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GCfMS)

Method: 8260B Analysis Batch: 460-37643 Instrument 10: VOAMS12

Preparation: 5035 Prep Batch: 460-37413 Lab File 10: o37400_d
Dilution: 1.0 Initial WeighWolume: 5.02 9
Dale Analyzed: 05/18/2010 0018 Final WelghWo[ume: 5 mL
Date Prepared: 05/14/2010 0850

Analyte DryWt ---Corrected: Y Result (ugIKg) Qualifier MOL RL

- - -·---- --- --­
Chloromethane -·--
---

1.2 U 0.78 1.2

-- --------------,.- - - -,-�,,--.- ----.-----�--
---" --�,-
--

Bromomethane 1.2 u 0.50 1.2

Vinyl chloride 1.2 u 0.29 1.2
Chloroethane 1.2 u 0.49 1.2
Methylene Chloride 1.2 u 0.58 1.2
Trichloronuoromethane 1.2 u 0.32 1.2
1.1-0ichloroelhene 1.2 u 0.45 1.2
1,1-Dichloroethane 1.2 u 0.31 1.2
trans-1,2·Dichloroethene 1.2 u 0.35 1.2
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.2 u 0.29 1.2
Chloroform 1.2 u 0.29 1.2
1,2-Dichloroethane 1.2 u 0.48 1.2
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1_2 u 0.23 1.2
Carbon tetrachloride 1.2 u 0.12 1.2
Bromodlchloromethane 1.2 u 0.37 1.2
1,2-Dichloropropane 1.2 u 0.39 1.2
cis-1,3- Dichloropropene 1.2 u 0.25 1.2
T richloroethene 1.2 u 0.45 1.2
Dibromochloromelhane 1.2 u 0.69 1.2
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.2 u 0.73 1.2
Benzene 1.2 u 0.91 1.2
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.2 u 0.27 1.2
2-Chloroethyt vinyl ether 6.1 u 1.6 6.1
Bromoform 1.2 u 0.86 1.2
Tetrachloroethene 1.2 u 0.40 1.2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroelhane 1.2 u 0.93 1.2
Toluene 1.2 u 0.37 1.2
Chlorobenzene 1.2 u 0.59 1.2
Ethylbenzene 1.2 u 0.23 1.2
Xytenes, Total 3.7 u 0.96 3.7

Surrogate %Rec Qualffier Acceptance Limits

--

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 92 70 - 138

-_._-,-,,---- - �-,,---.------..-------,-,,----------�,,�.---

Toluene-d8 (Surr) 88 66 - 126

Bromonuorobenzene 102 72 - 132

TestAmerica Edison Page 14 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139·1

ClI'ent S am pl e 10: TB·36·7

Lab Sample ID: 460-13139-2 Date Sampled: 0511212010 0945

Client Matrix: Soil % MoIsture: 18.8 Date ReCeived: 0511312010 1830

82608 Volaute Organic Compounds (GCfMS)

Melhod: 8260B Analysi s Batch: 460-37643 Instrument 10: VOAMS12

Prepardtion: 5035 Prep Balch: 460·37413 Lab File 10: o37400,d
Dilution: 1,0 In!tlal WeighWolume: 5,02 9
Date Analyzed: 0511612010 0018 FInal WeighWolume: 5 mL
Date Pr epared: 05114/2010 0850

Tentatively Identiflad Compounds Numbe( TIC's Found; o

Cas Number Qualifier

TestAmerlca Edison Page 15 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Cllen!: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10: TB-2 5�

lab Sample ID: 460-13139-4 Dale Sampled: 0511212010 1045

Cllent Matrix: Soli % MOisture: Dale Received: 0511312010 1830

8260S Volatile O(ganlc Compounds (GC/MS)

Method: 8260B Anal�'sis Balch: 460�37643 Instrument 10: VOAMS12

Preparation: 5035 Prep Balch: 460-37413 lab File fD: o37401.d
Dilution: 1.0 Initial WeighWolumo: 3.75 9
Dale Analyzed: 0511812010 0043 Final WelghtNo[ume: 5 ml
Date Prepared: 05114/2010 0854

Qualifier MDl RL
U���--·� -O�97�-·
Bromomeihane 1.5 U 0.63
Vinyt chloride 1.5 U 0.36
Chloroethane 1.5 U 0.61
Melliylene Chloride 1.5 U 0.72
Trichlorofluoromethane 1.5 U 0040
1,1-Dichloroethene 1.5 U 0.56
1,1-Dichforoethane 1.5 U 0.39
trans-1,2-0ichtoroethene 1.5 U 0.43
cis-1,2-DI'chloroelhene 1.5 U 0.36
Chloroform 1.5 U 0.36
1,2wDichloroethane 1.5 U 0.60
1,1.1-Tricl1loroefhane 1.5 U 0.29
Carbon tetrachloride 1.5 U 0.15
Bmmodichloromethane 1.5 U 0.46
1,2-Dlchforopropane 1.5 U 0.49
cis-1.3-Dichloropropene 1.5 U 0.31
Trichloroethene 1.5 U 0.55
Dlbromochlofomelhane 1.5 U 0.66
1, 1,2�Ttichloroethane 1.5 U 0.91
Benzene 1.5 U 1.1
trans-1,3·0ichloropropene 1.5 U 0.34
2·Chloroethy1 vinyl ether 7.6 U 1.9
Bromoform 1.5 U L1
T elrachloroothene 1.5 U 0.50
1,1.2.2-Tetrach!oroethane 1.5 U 1.2
Toluene 1.5 U 0.46
Chlorobenzene 1.5 U 0.74
Ethylbenzene 1.5 U 0.29
Xylenes, Tolal 4.6 U 1.2

SUIT?9�!: __
�
," .. " .---�- �
t!I/j)Rec
.--�---��
Qualifier ._.��...

�.
:Ac:-;ceptance
�
Limits
1.2-Dichloroethane·d4 (SUIT) 95 - 138
T oluene-d8 (SUIT) 89 66 - 126
Bromo(!uorobenzene 105 72 -132

TestAmerica Edison Page 16 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460·13139·1

Client Sample 10: TB·25-6

Lab Sample 10: 460-13139-4 Dale Sampled: 0511212010 1045

Client Matrix: Soil 0/" Moisture: 12.8 Date Received: 05/1312010 1830

8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GCIMS)

Method: 8260B Analysis Batch: 460-37643 Instrument 10: VOAMS12

Preparation: 5035 Prep Batch: 460-37413 Lab Fite lO: 037401.Q
DiluUon: 1.0 lnifial WaighWo!ume: 3.75 9
Date Analyzed: 0511812010 0043 Final WelghWolume: 5 mL
Date Prepared: 0511412010 0854

Tentatively Identified Compounds Number TiC's Found: o

Cas Number RT Est. Result (ugIKg) Qualifier-

None

Tf;'\stAmerica Edison Page 17 of 623 06/03/2Q10

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

cnent Sam ple 10: 18·12·3

Lab Sample ID: 460·13139·5 Dale Sampled: 0511212010 1125

Client Matrix: SoU % Moisture: 6.5 Dale ReceiVed: 05113120101830

alGoa Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)

Method: 8260B Analysis Batch: 460·37643 Instrument 10: VOAM S1 2

Preparation: 5035 Prep Balch: 460-37413 Lab File lD: o37402.d
Dilution: 1.0 lniUa! WeightNolume: 3.09 9
Date Analyzed: 05/1812010 0108 Final WelghWolumo: 5 mL
Date Prepared: 0511412010 0855

Re",,11 (ugIKg) Qualifier MOL

Anatyle
a;lor;;;i;;e hane ·· · -. ��.. . .DryWl Corrected: Y
..�.�. �.���.�.� �1�i ... ..
.. .�. ···-·· ·-·······�·- ·
RL
.. ---�-. - �--- -

U 1:r 1.7
Bromomethane 1.7 U 0,71 1.7
Vinyl chloride 1.7 U 0,41 1.7
Chloroethane 1.7 U 0,69 1.7
Methylene Chloride 1.7 U 0,82 1.7
Trichtorofiuoromethane 1.7 U 0.45 1.7
1.1-Dichloroethene 1.7 U 0.64 1.7
1,1-0ichloroelhane 1.7 U 0.44 1.7
1rans-1,2-Dichroroothone 1.7 U 0.49 1.7
cls·1,2-Dichloroethene 1.7 U 0.41 1.7
Chloroform 1.7 U 0.41 1 .7
1,2-Dichloroethane 1.7 U 0.68 1.7
1,1,1-Trichloroeihano 1.7 U 0.32 1.7
Carbon tetrachloride 1.7 U 0,17 1.7
Bromodich!oromethane 1.7 U 0.53 1.7
1,2-Dichloropropane 1.7 U 0,55 1.7
cis·1.3-Dlchloropropen e 1.7 U 0.35 1,7
Trich!oroethene 1.7 U 0.63 1.7
Dibromochloromethane 1.7 U 0.97 1,7
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.7 U 1.0 1.7
Benzene 1.7 U 1.3 1,7
trans·1,3-Plchloropropene 1.7 U 0.38 1.7
2-Chforoethy1 vlnyl ether 8.7 U 2.2 8.7
Bromoform 1.7 U 1.2 1.7
Tettachloroethene 1.7 U 0.57 1.7
1.1,2,2-T elrachloroethane 1.7 U 1.3 1.7
Toluene 1,7 U 0.52 1.7
Chlorobenz.ene 1.7 U 0.83 1.7
Ethylbenz.ene 1.7 U 0.33 1.7
Xylenes, Tota! 5.2 U 1.4 5 .2

Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits

1,2-Dlchloroethano=<i4(S·urr)
-"�.�--�...

100 70 - 138
Toluene-dB (Surr) 90 66 -126
Bromofluorobenzene 108 72 - 132

TestArnerrca Edison Page 19 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139·1

e!fenl Sample W; TB.12·3

Lab Sample ID: 46()'13139·5 Date Sampled: 0511212010 1125

Client Matnx: Soil % M oisture: 6.5 Date Received: 05/13/2010 1830

82608 Volatllo Organic Compounds (GClMS)

Method: 82608 Analysis Batch: 460·37643 Inslrument 10: VOAMS12

Preparation: 5035 Prep Batch: 460·37413 lab File JO: 037402.d
Dltulion: 1.0 lolUal WeighWolume: 3.09 9
Dale Analyzed: 0511812010 0108 Final WeighWolume: 5 ml
Date Prepared: 05114/2010 0855

Tentatively Ide ntified Compounds Number TIC's Found: o

Cas NUmber RT Est. Resu lt (ug��L_� _

_ �Qua�fi.':.._�
Nono

TestAmerica Edison Page 19 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139·1

Client Sample 10: TB·53-4

Lab Sample 10; 460·13139-7 Date Sampled; 05/12120101230

Client Matrix: Soil % Moisture: 61.5 Dale Received: 05/13/2010 1830

8260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)

Method: 82608 Analysis Balch: 460·31643 Instrument lD: VOAMS12

Preparatron: 5035 Prep Batch: 460·31413 Lab File 10: 037403.0
Dilution: 1.0 Initial WeighWo!ume: 2.50 9
Date Analyzeo: 05/1812010 0133 Final WeighWolume: 5 mL
Date Prepared: 05/14/2010 0858

TentatiYely Identified Compounds Number llC's Found: 3

Cas Number Anatyt_ RT Est. Result (uglKg) Qualifier

-- Acilio"•.... �.�� .. �... .. . . .� ... . -� ...... ....... ··..�·1.94 "---'-� - ��---.. -.

1100
2·8ut8non8 (MEK) 3.23 220
Unknown 10.68 28 TJ

/
Tf3stAmerica Edison Page 21 of 623 06/0 3 2010
 Analytical Data

Client: Duffietd Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10: TB-36·7

lab Sample 10; 460·13139·2 Date Sampled: 0511212010 0945

Client Matrix: Soli % MOIsture: 18,8 Da!e Received: 0511312010 1830

8210C Semlvotatile Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)

Method: 8270C Analysis Batch: 460·37818 Instfument 10: BNAMS10

Preparation: 3541 Prep Balch: 460-37564 Lab File 10: p2888,d
Dilution: 1,0 Inmal WelghWolume: 15,00 9
Date Analyzed: 0511812010 1500 Final WeightNolume: 1 mL
Dale Prepared: 0511712010 0900 Injection Volume:

Analyte DryWl Corrected: Y Result (uglKg) Quallfier MDL RL

-,�--.-� .... ""-'�-'4fo'--------"�' "'--0--- --"'50"--- ".'"
J5henOi�-
"��"���

2-Chlorophenol 410 U 54 410

2-Nitrophenol 410 U 67 410
2,4�Dimethylphenol 410 U 65 410
2,4·0ichlorophenol 410 U 65 410
4-Chloro-3-melhylphenol 410 U 68 410
2,4,6- Tochlorophenol 410 U 73 410
2,4-Dlnllrophenol 1200 U 86 1200
4�Nltrophenol 1200 U 100 1200
4 ,6wDinitro-2-methyiphenot 1200 U 190 1200
Pentachlorophenol 1200 U 200 1200
N-Ntlrosod!methylamlno 410 U 41 410
BIs(2-chloroethyl)elher 41 U 8,5 41
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 410 U 56 410
1 ,4�D!chlorobenzene 410 U 61 410
1.2-Dichlorobenzene 410 U 65 410
N·Nitrosodi-n�propyfamjne 41 U 5,4 41
Hexachloroethane 41 U 6,9 41
Nilrobenzene 41 U 9,1 41
!sophorone 410 U 47 410
B1s(2-chloroethoxy)mothano 410 U 58 410
1 ,2.4�T richlofobenzone 41 U 6.7 41
Naphthalene 410 U 60 410
Hexachlorobutadlene 83 U 17 83
Hexachlofocyclopentadiene 410 U 120 410
2-Chloronaphthalone 410 U 58 410
Dimethyl phthalate 410 U 55 410
Acenaphthytene 410 U 58 410
2,6-Dlnllrotoluene 83 U 10 83
Acenaphthene 410 U 58 410
2,4·Drnilroto!ueno 83 U 12 83
Oiethy! phthalate 410 U 55 410
4-Chiorophonyl phenyl ether 410 U 70 410
Fluorene 410 U 69 410
N-Nitrosooiphenylamlne 410 U 66 410
4�Bromophenyl ptlenyl ether 410 U 73 410
Hexachlorobenzene 41 U 5.7 41
Phenanthrene 410 U 71 410
Anthracene 410 U 72 410
Ol-n-bu!yl phthalate 410 U 62 410
F!uoranthene 410 U 68 410
Pyrene 410 U 10 410
BenZidine 410 U' 87 410
Butyf benzyl phthalate 410 U 48 410
3,3'·Dichlorobenzldine 830 U 90 830
Benzo[a]anthracene 28 J 7,5 41

TestAmerica Edison Page 22 of 623 06/03 /2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-1 3139·1

Client Sample 10: TB-36·7

lab Sample 10: 460-13139·2 Date Sampled: 0511212010 0945

Client Malrix: Soil % Moisture: 18.8 Date Received: 0511312010 1830

8270C Semhfolatile Compounds by Gas ChromatographylMass Spectrometry (GClMS)

Method: 8270e Analysis Belch: 460·37818 Instrument 10: BNAMS10

Proparation: 3541 Prep Balch: 460·37564 lab File 10: p2888.d
Dilution: 1.0 l nilla! WeightNolume: 15.00 9
Date Analyzed: 0511812010 1500 Final WelghtIVolume: 1 ml
Date Preparod: 0511712010 0900 injection Volume:

Analyle Dr)'W-,-�or,="te(t Y Result (ugIKg) Qualifier MOL RL

���'410������---"'��
ChrySana �----�-----�--�"���--
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 120 J 54 410
Dl�n-octyl phlhalate 410 U 48 410
Benzo[bJl1uoranthane 41 U 6.1 41
Benzo[k}fiuoranthene 41 U 5,7 41
Benzo[aJpyrene 41 U 5.0 41
Indeno[l,2,3-<d]pyren e 41 U 6.5 41
Oibenz(a,h}anthraceno 41 U 4.9 41
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 410 U 43 410
bis (2-<:hlorotsopropyl) ether 410 U 53 410

Surrogate %Rec QUalifier limits

- -
Nltrobenzene::tiS
-.-.--
- --.-�---
---

Phenol-<:l5 82 41 -118
Terphenykl14 100 16 -151
2.4.6�T ribromopheno! 78 10 - 120
2-Fluorophenol 76 37 ·125
2-Fluorobfphonyl 78 40 - 109

TestAmerjca Ediso n Page 23 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

C lient Sample 10: 1B·36·7

Lab Sample 10: 460-13139·2 Date Sampled: 05/1212010 0945

Client Matrix: Soli (I/o MoIsture: 18.8 Date Recaived: 05/13/2010 1830

8270C Semivolatile Compounds by Gas ChromafographyJMass Spectrometry (G C/MS)

Melhod: B270C Analysis Balch: 460·37818 Instrument 10: BNAMS10

Preparation� 3541 Prep Batch : 460·37564 lab File 10: p2888.d
Dllutlon: 1.0 InItIal WeighWo!ume: 15.00 9
Date An alyzed: 05/18/2010 1500 Final WeighWolume: 1 mL
Date Prepared: 05/17/2010 0900 lnjeeUon Volume:

Tentativel y Identified C ompounds Number TIC's Found: o

Qualifier

TestAmeriea Edison Page 24 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

CUent Sample 10: TB·25·6

Lab Sample ID: 460·13139·4 Dala Sampled: 0511212010 1045

Client Matrix: Soli % Moisture: Dale Received: 0511312010 1830

8210C Se mlvo la t l le Compounds by G�s Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)

Melhod: 8270 C Analysis Saleh: 460·31818 instrument 10: BNAMS1Q

Preparation: 3541 Prop Balch: 46()'37564 Lab File 10: p2900.d
Dilution: 1.0 Initial WelghWolume: 15,05 9
Dale Analyzed: 0511812010 2025 Final WeighlNolume: 1 mL
Date Prepared: 0511712010 0900 Injection Volume:

Analyle
... __ _____ Y."t c:.()""':t,,d:"l'
IJr� __
Result (uglKgJ
'380'----- QuaUfier MDL RL
pf)enol--
2�Chlorophenol 380 U 51 3BO
2�Nitrophanol 380 U 62 3BO
2,4-Dimethytpheno! 3BO U 61 380
2.4�D1c.hloroph eno' 380 U 61 380
4-Chloro-3-mothylphenol 3BO U 63 3BO
2.4,6-Tlichlorophonol 380 U 6B 380
2,4-Dinilrophenol 1100 U 80 1100
4-Nltrophenol 1100 U 97 1100
4,,6·Dinilro-2 -methylplienol 1100 U 180 1100
Pentachlorophenol 1100 U 180 1100
N-Nitrosodimethylamine 3BO U 39 380
Bis{2�chforoelhyl)ether 38 U 1.9 38
1.3-Dichlorobenzene 3BO U 52 3BO
1.4-Dlchlorobenzene 380 U 56 380
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 380 U 60 380
N· Nltrosodi-n·propylamlne 38 U 5,0 3B
Hexachloroethane 38 U 6A 38
Nilrobenzene 38 U 8,5 38
Isophorone 3BO U 43 380
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 380 U 54 3BO
1,2,4-Trichforobenzeno 38 U 6,2 38
Naphthalene 3BO U 55 380
Hexach!orobutadiene 11 U 15 11
Hexach!orocyclopentadiene 3BO U 110 380
2-Chforonaphthalene 3BO U 53 3BO
Dimelhyt phfhalate 380 U 51 3BO
AcenaphthyJene 97 J 54 380
2.6�Djnitroto!uene 77 U 9,6 11
Acenaphlhene 110 J 54 380
2,4-DfnitrotoJuene 11 U 11 71
Dlethyl phthalate 3BO U 51 380
4-Chrorophenyl phenyl elher 380 U 65 380
Fluorene 150 J 54 3BO
N·Nltrosodlphenylamine 3BO U 62 380
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 380 U 67 380
Hexach!orobenzene 38 U 5,2 38
Phenanthrene 1500 66 380
Anthracene 240 J 67 380
DI..,·butyt phthalate 380 U 58 380
Fluoranthene 1800 63 3BO
Pyrene 1500 65 380
Benzidine 380 U' 80 3BO
Butyl benzyl phthalate 380 U 44 380
3,3'-Dichlorobenzldine 110 U 84 110
Benzo[a]anthracene 710 7,0 38

TestAmorica Edison Page 25 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Clien!: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Cllont Sample 10: T8-2SO{;

Lab Sample lD: 460-13139-4 Dale Sampled; 05112120101045

Client Matrix: Soil % Molsture: Dale Received: Q5/1312010 1830

8270C SernivoJatile Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Sp.ectromelfy (GCJMS)

Method: 82 70C Analysis Batch: 460-37818 Instrument 10: BNAMS10

Preparation: 3541 Prep Batch: 460-37564 Lab File 10: p2900,d
Dilution: 1,0 initial WelghtNolume: 15,05 9
Date Analyzed: 05/18/2010 2025 Final WeightNolume: 1 mL
Date Ptepared: 05/1712010 0900 Injection Voiume:

!,nal�: Qualifier MOL RL

_,��" " �
, ��-,�,-��-�!!��!�; y -'300 '
Chrysene
Bis{2-othyihexylj phthalate 210 J 50 380
Di-n-octyl phlhalale . 380 U 45 380
BenzolbJflu oranthene 820 5,6 38
Benzo[k]l1umanthene 300 5,3 38
Benzo[aJpyrene 800 4.7 38
Indeno[l,2,3'cdjpyrene 610 6,0 38
Dibenz(a,h}anthracene 130 4,5 38
Benzo[g,h,iJperylene 680 40 380
h1s (2�chloroisopropy1) ether 380 l! 50 380

Acceptance Limits
��r rog�_�._,�. �'�.T�r._'_�_"'�"'__ �" '"'
%Rec
59
-'-""�''''
Qualifier
�-''- ''''-�'''''-''-''- ' ' ' ' ' '-''-'--''- - TOfr�--'"
Nitrobenlene-dS 38
Phenol--d5 60 41,118
Terphenyl--d14 74 16- 151
2,4,6�Tnbromophenol 53 10·120
2�Fluorophenol 55 37 ·125
2�FluQrobiphenyi 67 40 - 109

TcstAmerica Edison Page 26 Qf 623 06/0 3/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10: TB·2 �-6

tab Sa m pl e l D: 460·13139-4 Date Sa m pl ed: 05/12120101045

CHent Malrix: Soil % Moisture: 12.8 Date Received: 05/13/2010 1830

8270C Semi volatile Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass SpaClrometry (GC/MS}

M.thO<l: 8270C Analysis Batch: 460-37818 InsirumanllD: BNAMS10

Pre p aration: 3541 Prep Batch: 460-37564 tab FlielD: p2900.d
Diluti on: , 1.0 Initial WelghWolume: 15.05 9
Dale Analyzed: 05118/2010 2025 Final WeighWolume: 1 mL
DatePreparod: 05117/2010 0900 fnledian Volume:

Tentatively Identified Compounds NUmber TIC's Found: 9

Cas Number Araly1e RT Est. Result (ugIKgJ Qualmer

- "���··-�- 15-H�
1 2" AH� 1'�-'�-'--'"-�-�-'
-- -- �-.--..."----.- �-- -9�-�O----- ----'"--rT- -".c.
P
-- --�,

C
C15H12PAH-2 9.25 440 TJ
C15Hl01C15H12 PAHs 9.33 550 TJ
C15H12PAH·3 9.36 320 TJ
84-65-1 9,10-Anthracenedione 9.54 510 TJN
C16H14 PAH 9.77 330 TJ
C17HI2PAH-l 10A9 370 TJ
C17HI2PAH-2 10.60 380 TJ
C20H12PAH 13.25 500 TJ

TestAmerica Edison Page 27 of 623 06/0 3/2010

 Analytical Oata

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Cltent Sample 10: TB·1 2·3

Lab Sample ID: 460-13139·5 Date Sampled: 05/1212010 1125

CUent Mattix: Soil % MoIsture: 6.5 Dale Received: 05/1312010 1830

6270C Semlvolatile Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)

Method: 8270C An.lysis Baloh: 460·37818 Instrumenl lD: BNAMS10

Preparation: 3541 Prep 8.loh:460-37564 lab File ID: p2881.d
Ditutlon: 1.0 Initial WeightJVolume: 15.02 9
Dale AnalyZed: 05/1812010 1152 Final WeightJVo!ume: 1 mL
Date Prepared: 0511712010 0900 Injection Volume:

Analyle DryWI Correcled: Y Result (ugJKg) Qualifier MDL RL

--- -
- _._ - .. '�35il-�--- -- -U-'--
Phenol
-_ . .

2-Chlorophenot 350 U 47 350

2-Nitrophenol 350 U 58 350
2,4-Dimethylpheno! 350 U 57 350
2,4-Dieh!oropheno[ 350 U 57 350
4-Chloro-3-methyfphenol 350 U 59 350
2,4,6-Trichloropheno! 350 U 63 350
2,4·Dinitrophenol 1100 U 75 1100
4-Nitrophenol 1100 U 91 1100
4,6-Dinitro-2-methytpheno! 1100 U 170 1100
Pentachlorophenol 1100 U 170 1100
N-Nitrosodimethylamine 350 U 36 350
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 35 U 7.4 35
1.3-Dichlorobenzene 350 U 48 350
1 A·Dichlorobenzene 350 U 53 350
1.2-Dlchlorobenzene 350 U 57 350
N-Nitroso()i-n-propylamine 35 U 4.7 35
Hexachloroethane 35 U 6.0 35
Nitrobenzene 35 U 7.9 35
Isophorone 350 U 41 350
Bis{2-chloroethoxy)methane 350 U 50 350
1,2,4-Trichlorobanzene 35 U 5.8 35
Naphthalene 350 U 52 350
Haxachlorobutadlane 72 U 14 72
Hexachlorocyclopentadlene 350 U 100 350
2-Ghloronaphthalene 350 U SO 350
DImethyl. phthalaie 350 U 48 350
Acenaphthy!ene 350 U 51 350
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 72 U 9.0 72
Acenaphthene 350 U 50 350
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 72 U 10 72
Diethyt phthalate 350 U 47 350
4-Chloropheny[ phenyl elher 350 U 61 350
Fluorene 350 U 60 350
N�Nitrosodjphenylamine 350 U 58 350
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 350 U 63 350
Hexac.hlorobenzene 35 U 4.9 35
Phenanthrene 350 U 62 350
Anthracene 350 U 62 350
Di-n-butyl phthalate 350 U 54 350
Fluoran1hene 350 U 59 350
Pyrena 350 U 61 350
Benzidine 350 U' 75 350
Butyl benzyl phthalate 350 U 41 350
3.3'·DichlorobenzIdine 720 U 78 720
Benzo[a]anthracene 35 U 6.5 35

TestAmcrica Edison Page 28 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10; T6-12-3

Lab Sample ID: 460-13139-5 Da!e Sampled: 05/12/2010 1125

Client Matrix: Soil % Molslure: 6.5 Dale Received: 05/13/2010 1830

8270C Semivolatile CompeundtJ by Gas ChromatogtaphyJMass S p e c trometry (GeIMS)

Method: 8270C Analysts Betch: 460-37818 Instrument ID; BN AMS 1 0

Preparation: 3541 Prep Batch: 46()'37564 lab Fife ID: p2881.d
Dilution: 1.0 Initial WeighWolume: 15.02 9
Date Analyzed: 0511812010 1152 Final WelghtlVolume: 1 mL
Dale Prepared: 0511712010 0900 tnjec!lon Volume;

Analyle Corrected: Y Res ult (ug/Kg] Qualifier MDL RL

iirysene········ ..- , . 350 --··· -·-·�···- U-� ..--- -..
C
.-� ...�.-.. .. . . . '-." .•... . .-.�. ..�

51 350
Bls(2-elhylhexyl] phthalate 350 u 47 350
Di-n-octyl phthalate 350 u 42 360
Benzo[b)fluoranthono 35 u 5.3 35
Benzo(k1f1uoranthene 35 u 4.9 35
8enzo(a)pymne 35 u 4.3 35
Indeno!1.2.3·cdJpyrene 35 u 5.7 35
Dibenz(a.h}anlhraccno 35 u 4.3 35
Benzo[gMlpefy1ene 350 u 37 350
bls (2--chlorolsopropyl) ether 350 u 46 350

Surrogato %Rec Qualifier Umi l

s
Nilfobenzene�(f5""�
Phenol-d5 68 41 -118
T erphenyl-<l14 91 16 - 151
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 93 10 - 120
2·Fluorophenol 58 37 -125
2-Fluorobiphenyj 69 40 -109

TestAmeric:a Edison Page 29 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139·1

Client Sample 10: TB·12·3

lab Sample 10; 460·13139·5 Date Sampled: 0511212010 1125

Client Matrix: Soil % Mofsture: 6.5 Date Received: 0511312010 1830

8270C Semivolatile Com pound s by Gas ChromntographyJMass Spectrometry {GC/MS)

Method: 8270C Analysis Batch: 460-3181 a Instrument ID: BNAMS10

Preparation: 3541 Prep Batch; 46()'37564 leb Fite iD; p2881.d
Dilution: 1.0 Initial WejghWol�Jma; 15.02 9
Date Analyzed: 05/1812010 1152 Final WelghWolume: 1 ml
Date Prepared: 05/1712010 0900 Injeciion Volume:

Tentatively Identmed Compounds Number TIC's Found: 0

RT Qualifier

TestAmerica Edison Page 30 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10: T8-53-4

lab Sample 10: 460-1 3 1 39-7 Dalo Sampled: 0511212010 1230

CHent Matrix: SoU % Mo!s!ure: 61.5 Dale Received: 0511312010 1830

8270C Semlvolatlle Compounds by Gas ChromatographylMass Spectrometry (GCfMS)

Method: 8270C Analysis Balch: 460-37818 Instrument 10: BNAMS10

Preparation: 3541 Prop Balch: 460-37564 Lab File ID: p2899.d
Dilution: 1.0 Inittal WclghWolume: 1 5.01 9
Date Analyzed: 05/1812010 1958 Final WalghWolume: 1 mL
Date Prepared: 0511712010 0900 Injection Volume:

Analyte Ory\Nt Corrected: Y Result (ug/Kg) Qualifier MOL Rl

---�--- ··�··--·-�-�---··- _._-_ . .._..• ·-U· ·········-··ilo-···-··--···8�-·· · ··
Phenol 860
2�Chlotophenol 860 U 110 860
2-Nltrophenol 860 U 140 860
2,4-0imethylpi1enol 860 U 140 860
2,4-Dichlorophenof 860 U 140 860
,4-Chloro-3-melhylphenol 860 U 140 860
2,4,6-Tlichlorophenol 860 U 150 860
2,4�Dinitrophenol 2600 U 100 2600
4-Nitropheno! 2600 U 220 2600
4 ,6-0initro-2�methyipheno� 2600 U 410 2600
Pentachlorophenol 2600 U 420 2600
N-Nitrosodimelhylamine 860 U 88 860
Bis(2�chloroethy!)ether 86 U 18 86
1,3-0ichlorobenzene 860 U 120 800
1 A·Dichlorobenzene 860 U 130 860
1 ,2�Dichlorobanzene 860 U 140 860
N-Nitrosodr-n·propyfamlne 86 U 11 86
Hexachloroethane 86 U 14 86
Nitrobenzene 86 U 19 86
Isophorone 860 U 99 860
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)mothllne 860 U 120 860
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 86 U 14 86
Naphthalene 860 U 130 860
Hexadllorobutadiene 170 U 35 170
Hexachlorocyclopentadlene 860 U 250 860
2�Chloronaphlhalene 860 U 120 860
Dimethyl phthalate 860 U 120 860
Acenaphthylene 860 U 120 860
2,6·Dinifroto!uene 170 U 22 170
Aoonaphthene 200 J 120 860
2,4-Dinitroto!uene 170 U 25 170
Diethyl phthalate 860 U 120 860
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 860 U 150 860
Fluorene 440 J 150 860
N-Nitrosodlphenylamine 860 U 140 860
4 ·Bromophenyl phenyi other 860 U 150 860
Hexachlorobonzone 86 U 12 86
Phenanthrene 1800 150 860
Anthracene 260 J 150 860
Di-n-butyl phlhalale 860 U 130 860
Fluorantheno 1 300 140 860
Pyrena 790 J 150 860
Benzidine 860 U' 180 860
Butyl benzyl phthalate 860 U 100 860
3,3'·Dlchlorobenzidine 1700 U 190 1 700
Benzo[a}anthraoone 380 16 86

TestAmerica Edison Page 31 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical D ata

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10; T6-53-4

Lab S ample ID: 46Cf.13139-7 Dale Sampled: 05112120101230

Client Matrix: Soil % Moisture: 615
, Date Received: 05113/2010 1830

6270C Semivolatite Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)

Mel hod : 8270e Analysis Balch: 460-37818 Instrument ID: BNAMS10

PreparaUon: 3541 Prep Balch: 460-37564 Lab Fita ID: 1·2899_0
DUution: 1.0 In!Ual WeighWolume: 15,01 9
OateAnalyzed: 0511812010 1958 Final WeighWolume: 1 ml
Date Prepared: 0511712010 0900 Injection Volume:

Analyte DryWt Corrected: Y Result (uglKg) Qualifier MDL RL

,- ------ --�- --- i20- 8
:J-----'
.��,-�,-��- -� '�- ��----- 6ir -

Chrysena 560
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) ph thalate 190 J 110 860
Df�n-octyl phthalate 860 U 100 860
8enzo[b]Huoranthene 590 13 66
Benzo(k)ftuoranth ene 230 12 86
Benzo[a}p},rene 410 11 86
Indeno[1,2,3-cdjpyrene 460 14 86
Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 86 U 10 86
Benzo(g, h.iJperylene 460 J 91 860
bis (2-chloroisopropyt) ether 860 U 110 860

Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits

55- ----- '----'--- '
Nfirobenzene�d5
--�'-''--.-'- -
- ------
38 -105
-- - -- �---------
-'�" .-'-'''-'- -'
�.-"'-�"

Phenol-d5 41 41 -118
T erphenyl-<l14 54 16 -151
2,4 6, �Tnbromophenol 52 10 -120
2 -Fluorophenol 39 37 -125
2�Auorobipheny1 60 40 -109

iestAmerica Edison Page 32 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associa!es Job Number: 460-13139-1

ellent Sample 10: TB-53-4

lab Sample 10: 460-13139-7 Date Sampled: 0511212010 1230

Client Matrix: Soil % Moisture: 61.5 Oato Received: 0511312010 1830

8-270C SemtvoJatiJe Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectromotry (GC/MS}

Method: a270e Analysis Belch: 460-37818 Instrument 10: BNAMS10

Preparation: 3541 Prep Batch: 460-37564 lab File ID: p2899.d
Dilution: 1.0 Initial WeightNoluma: 15.01 9
DateAnalyzed: 0511812010 1958 Fina! WeightNolume: 1 ml
bate Prepared: 0511712010 0900 Injection Volume:

Tentatively Identified Compounds Numbor TIC's Found: 25

Cas Number Analyte RT Est. Result (ugIKg) Qualifier

-'�--------'---- .. ------·----·---... -.-- .�--·---------·--·Y2 i -·---5400----' · ---.--
Unknown-l T TJ
UnknownAlkane-1 12,22 13000 TJ
UnknownAlkane-2 13.16 23000 TJ
Unknown-? 13.86 4200 TJ
7616-22-0 ,gamma,�Tocopherof 13.96 8500 TJN
UnknownAlkane-3 14,13 16000 TJ
59-02-9 VitamIn E 14.36 11000 TJN
Unknown-3 15.02 3800 TJ
Unknown-4 15.21 6500 TJ
Unknown-5 15.37 10000 TJ
Unknown-6 15.62 30000 TJ
Unknown Sterol 15.72 10000 TJ
1000194-62-4 4,4,6a,6b,8a,11,11,14b-Octame!hy1-1,4,40 15.77 30000 TJN
Unknown-7 15.81 4700 TJ
Unmowf)*8 15.86 9800 TJ
Unknown·9 15.98 22000 TJ
Unknown-10 16.11 36000 TJ
Unknown-11 16.27 11000 TJ
Unknown�12 16.32 23000 TJ
Unknown�13 16.37 10000 TJ
Unknown�14 16.44 10000 TJ
Unknown�15 16.55 13000 IJ
Unknown�16 16.75 3400 TJ
Unknown-17 16.86 5100 TJ
Unl<.nown·1B 17.40 4500 TJ

TestAmerica Edison l>age 33 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10: TB-36-7

Lab Sample 10: 460-13139-2 Date Sampled: 05/1212010 0945

Client Matrix: Soil % Moisture: 18.8 Date Received: 05/13/2010 1830

8081A Organochlorine Pesticides (GC)

Method: 8081A Analysis Batch: 460·37575 Instrument 10: PESTGC1

Preparation: 3541 Prep Batch: 460-37420 Initial WeighWolume: 15.00 9
DlIution: 1.0 Final WeighWolume: 10 mL
Date Analyzed: 05/1712010 0800 Injection Volume: 1 uL
Dale Prepared: 05/14/2010 0915 Result Type: PRIMARY

Anatyte DryWt Corrected: Y Result (ug/Kg) Qualifier MOL RL

f:8 �,�--.-��"-"��--

U
��,�-�- -�-� - ---���"�- ------>�'--��

Aldrin 8.3 8.3

alpha-BHC 8.3 U 1.5 8.3
beta�BHC 8.3 U 1.1 8.3
delta�BHC 8.3 U 1.3 8.3
gamma�BHC (Lindane) 8.3 U 0.96 8.3
l
Ch ordane 83 U 18 83
4,4'-000 8.3 U 0.99 8.3
4,4'-00E 8.3 U 1.6 8.3
4,4'-00T 8.3 U 1.0 8.3
Dieldrin 8.3 U 1.6 8.3
Endosulfan I 8.3 U 1.7 8.3
Endosulfan Ii 8.3 U 1.2 8.3
Endosulfan sulfate 8.3 U 1.1 8.3
Endlin 8.3 U 1.2 8.3
Endlin aldehyde 8.3 U 2.1 8.3
Heptachlor 8.3 U 1.2 8.3
x
�eptachlor epo ide 8.3 U 1.7 8.3
Toxaphene 83 U 17 83

Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance limits

�� � - 1 � - irr- =- fe;;-;; �-
l xy
�-
- -'- -��-----. ---��--'�----'---'--- 115 ----��-------'-------�-- -�22 -� - -�-�,.-�---�.-�----

Te trac loro- 141

DCB Decachlorobiphenyl 125 1 0 - 165

TestAmerica Edison Page 34 of 623 06/0 3/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield AssOCiates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10: T9·36-7

Lab Sample ID: 460-13139-2 Dale Sampled: 0511212010 0945

Client Matrix: Soli % Molsture: 18.8 Dale Received: 0511312010 H130

8081A Organochtorine Pesticides (Ge)

Method: S081A Analysis Balch: 4 6()'37575 Instr umenllD: PESTGCl

Preparation: 3541 Prep Batch: 460·37420 IniUai WeighWolume: 15.00 9
Dilution: 1.0 Final WeighlNo!ume; 10 mL
Data Analyzod: 0511712010 0800 lojQc!1on Volume: 1 uL
Date Propared: 0511412010 0915 Resull T ype: SECONDARY

Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Limits

'Te-tiachioro-:m�xYiena�--·-· �

DCB Decachlorobiphenyi 105 10 -165

TestAmerica Edison Page 35 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10: TB-25·6

Lab Sample 10: 460-131394 Date Sampled: 05/1212010 1045

Client Matfix: Svil % Moisture: 12.8 Dale Received: 05/1312010 1830

8081A Organochlorine Pesticides (GC)

Method: S081A Ana lysis Batch: 460·37575 Instrument 10: PESTGCl

Preparation: 3541 Prep Batch: 460-37420 Initial WeighWo[ume: 15.01 9
Dilution: 1.0 Final WeighWo!ume: 10 mL
Date Analyzed: 0511712010 0827 Injection Volume: 1 uL
Date Prepared: 0511412010 0915 Result Type: PRIMARY

Aoatyte DryWt Corrected: Y MDL RL

-
Aldrin�'.' - ------��---w-'�-��-�-----�- ______�w
alpha·BHC 7.7 U 1,4 7.7
beta·SHC 7.7 U 1.0 7.7
delta-BHC 7.7 U 1.2 7.7
gamma-BHe (Lindane) 7.7 U 0.89 7.7
Chlordane 170 p 17 77
4,4'-000 55 0.92 7.7
4,4'-D D E 8.6 p 1.5 7.7
4.4'-00T 29 0.96 7.7
Dieldrin 5.5 Jp 1.5 7.7
Endosulfan I 7.7 U 1.6 7.7
Endosulfan n 7.7 U 1.2 7.7
Endosulfan sulfate 7.7 U 0.99 7.7
Endnn 7.7 U 1.1 7.7
Endrin aldehyde 7.7 U 1.9 7.7
Heptachlor 7.7 U 1.1 7.7
Heptachlor epoxide 7.7 U 1.5 7.7
Toxaphene 77 U 16 77

Surrogate %Rec QualIFIer Ac ceptance Limlls

Tetmchloro:m:xYtene - -�---�- -
" ' ----�- ..- 22 -141
'"---'�'�"-'--"'---------�
DCB Decadlloroblphenyl 168 X 10 - 165

TestAmerica Edison Page 36 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10: TB-25-6

lab Sample 10: 460-13139-4 Date Sampled: 05/1212010 1045

Client Matrix:: Soli % Moisture: 12_8 Date Received: 0511312010 1830

8081A Organochlorine Pesticides (Gel

Method: SOSlA Analysis Batch: 460-37575 Instrument 10: PESTGCl

Preparation: 3541 Prep Batch: 460-37420 Initial WeighWo!ume: 15_01 9
Dilution: 1.0 Final WelghWolume: 10 mL
Date Analyzed: 0511712010 0827 Injectlon Volume: 1 uL
Dato Prepared: 0511412010 0915 Result Type: SECONDARY

Surroga1e %Rec Quallfl€:r Acceptance Limits

ret;8ChfOro:.-m:XY ene�--- -----�---�-�--N"�-��-��-- 106 ·-�-�·"-�··�· - .. -�.----�.�--� -------->- ---- ----,----

l 22 -141
DCB Decachlorobiphenyl 155 10,165

TestAmerfca Edison page 37 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Clie nt Sampl e 10; TB-12-3

lab Sample 10: 460-13139-5 Date Sampled: 05/1212010 1 125

Client Matrix: Soli % Moisture: 6.5 Date Received: 0511312010 1 830

8081A Organochlorine Pesticides (Ge}

Method: 8081A AnalySIS Batch: 460-37575 Instrument ID: PESTGCl

Preparation: 3541 Prep Batch: 460-37420 Initial WelghWolume: 15.00 9
Dilution: 1.0 Final WeightNolume: 10 ml
Date Analyzed: 05117120 10 0841 Injection Volume: 1 llL
Date Prepared: 0511412010 0915 Resuft Type: PRIMARY

Analyte
Aldrin ��'-"P

alpha-BHe 7.2 u 1.3 7.2

bela- SHC 7.2 u 0.97 7.2
delta-BHC 7.2 u 1.1 7.2
gamma-BHe (Lindane} 7,2 u 0.83 7.2
Chlordane 72 u 16 72
4,4'-DDD 7.2 u 0.86 7.2
4,4'-DDE 7.2 u 1.4 7.2
4,4'-DDT 7.2 u 0.90 7.2
Dieldrin 7.2 u 1.4 7.2
Endosulfan I 7.2 u 1.5 7.2
Endosuffan II 7.2 u 1.1 7.2
Endosulfan sulfate 7.2 u 0_92 7.2
Endrin 7.2 u 1.0 7.2
Endnn aldehyde 7.2 u 1.8 7.2
Heptachlor 7.2 u 1.0 7.2
Heptachlor epoxide 7.2 u 1.4 7.2
Toxaphene 72 u 15 72

Surrogate
T-etfaChI(;ro::m.xYlene�� �-..

DCB Decachloroblphenyl 138 10 - 165

TestAmerica Edison Page 38 of 623 06/ 03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associales Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10: T8-12-3

Lab Sample ID: 460-13139-5 Date Sampled: 05/12120101125

Client Matrix: Soil % Moisture: 6.5 Dale ReceIved: 05/1312010 1830

a081A Organochtorlne Pesticides (GC)

Method: SOSIA Analysis Batch: 460-37575 fnslrument ID: PESTGCl

Preparation: 3541 Prep Batch: 460-37420 tnittal WelghWo!ume: 15.00 9
Dilution: 1.0 Final WeighWolume: 10 mL
Date Analyzed: 0511712010 0841 Injection Votume: 1 uL
Dale Prepared: 05114/2010 0915 Rasull1ype: SECONDARY

TeslAmerica Edison Page 39 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10: TB-53-4

Lab Sample 10: 460-13139-7 Dale Sampled: 05/1212010 1230

Client Matrix: Soil % Moisture: 61_5 Date Received: 0511312010 1830

8081A Organochlorine Pesticides (GC)

Method: 8081A Analysis Balch: 460�37575 Inslrument 10: PESTGC1

Preparation: 3541 Prep Balch: 460-37420 Inilial WeighWolume: 15.00 9
Dilution: 1.0 Final WeighWolume: 10 mL
Date Analyzed: 05/1712010 0909 Injection Volume: 1 uL
Date Prepared: 05/14/2010 0915 Result Type: PRIMARY

Analyte DryWt Corrected: Y Result (ug/Kg) Qualifier MOL RL

_ 1
U T
�_ ��_C
__ "_" , ___ _____________ •______,______•___,__••____•___�__•__.�____•_________�_•• --�----'--- --- .

Aldrin 17 3.8
alpha-BHC 17 U 3.2 17
bela-BHC 17 U 2.4 17
della-BHC 17 U 2.7 17
gamma-BHC (Lindane) 16 Jp 2.0 17
Chlordane 1700 38 170
4,4'-000 17 U 2.1 17
4,4'-00E 18 P 3.4 17
4,4'-00T 17 U 2.2 17
Dieldrin 28 3.4 17
Endosulfan 1 17 U 3.7 17
Endosulfan II 17 U 2.6 17
Endosulfan sulfate 17 U 2.2 17
Endrin 17 U 2.4 17
Endrin aldehyde 17 U 4.3 17
Heptachlor 17 U 2.5 17
Heptachlor epoxide 17 U 3.5 17
Toxaphene 170 U 36 170

Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limits

��� ------_._--- -.----,-----�-,,---�.---- --------�--- . --,-- -�------ --__
. --

T etrachloro-m-xylene 76 22 -141
DCB Decachlorobiphenyl 75 10 - 165

TestAmerica Edison Page 40 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associales Job Number: 460-13139·1

Client Sample ID; TB·534

lab Sample 10: 460-13139-7 Dale Sampled: 05/1212010 1230

CIJent Matnx: Soil % Moisture: 61.5 Date Received: 05/13/2010 1830

8081A Organoc.hlorine Pesticides (Ge)

Method: SOB1A Analysis Batch: 460-37575 Inslrument 10; PESTGCl

Preparation: 3541 Prep Batch: 460-37420 1nmaJ WerghWolume: 15.00 9
DIlution: 1.0 Final WejghtNolume: 10 mL
Oate Analyzed: 05/1712010 0909 lnjection Volume: 1 uL
Date Prepared: 05/14/2010 0915 Result Type: SECONDARY

Surrogate %Rec Qualmsr Acceplance limits

--- ----�-- ii4 --- ,��"'-�--�- -�-'�'- �-"��-22�1 1--""'"
,.etrBChloro=-n;:xylene 4
DCB {)ecachlorobiphenyl 7S 10 - 16S

TestAmerica Edison Page 41 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139·1

Client Sample 10: TB·3 �·1

Lab Sample 10: 460-13139·2 Date Sampled: 0511212010 0945

Client Mairix: Soit % Moisture: 18.8 Date Received: 0511312010 1830

8082 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography

Melhod: 8082 Analysis Batch: 460·37531 Instrument 10; PESTGC7

Preparation: 3541 Prep Batch: 460·37391 Initial WelghWolume; 15.00 9
DHution: 1.0 Final WolghtNolume: 10 mL
Date Analyzed: 0511412010 1959 Injection Votume:
Dale Prepared: 0511412010 0719 Result Type: PRIMARY

Result (uglKgl Qualifier

83 _·u
Aroclor 1221 83 U 25 B3
Aroctar 1232 83 U 47 83
Arm;lor 1242 83 U 16 83
Aroclor 1248 83 U 22 83
Aroclor 1254 83 U 28 83
Aroclor 1260 83 U 9.2 83
Arocfor 1262 83 U 14 83
Arodor 1268 83 U 14 83

%Rec QuaUfier Acceptanw Umlts

. .��.�.----.- �'-'-'-27:-i •. .• • •••.�.-.-.

108 65

TestAmerica Edison Page 42 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10: Ta-36-7

Lab Sample ID: 460-13139-2 Date Sampled: 0511212010 0945

Client Matrlx: So i( Date ReC<lived: 0511312010 1830

8082 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas ChromatQgraphy

Method: 8082 Analysls Balch: 4611--37531 Instrument ID: PESTGC7

o
Prop ara U n: 3541 Prep Balch: 460-37391 InItial WeIghWolume: 15_00 9
DlJution: 1,0 Final WelghVVolume: 10 mL
Date Analyzed: 0511412010 1959 Injection Volume:
Date Prepared: 0511412010 0719 Rosull Typo: SECONDARY

Surrogate %Rsc
phen'Yi
DCSbecaChlorobi
- "'-�-"�" -�,

��-';106
- .. '-�-�

TesfAmerica Edison Page 43 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associales Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10: TB-25-6

Lab Sample ID: 460-131394 Date Sampled: 0511212010 1045

Clienf Matrtx: Soil % Moisture: 12_8 Dala Received: 0511312010 1830

8082 Polychlorinated Blphenyfs (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography

Method: 8082 Analysis Balch: 460-37531 Instrument 10: PESTGC7

PreparaUon; 3541 Prep B a tch: 460-37391 Initiaf WeighWo!ume: 15.03 9
Dilution: 1_0 Final WeighWolulOO: 10 mL
Dale Analyzed: 0511412010 2032 Injection Volume:
Date Prepared: 0511412010 0719 Result Typ.: PRIMARY

Analyle DryWI Con-ecled: Y

_��__�_M'�____ ����._�_.___
��sult1'g'!(�l _ QUalifier MOL RL
ArOCiOrl (J1S--- - -- --. 77
Aroclor 1221 77 U 23 77
Aroclor 1232 77 U 43 77
Aroclor 1242 77 U 15 77
AfOclOr 1248 77 U 20 77
Arnelor 1254 77 U 26 77
AToclor 1260 77 U 8_6 77
Aroclor 1262 77 U 13 77
Amclor 1268 77 U 13 77

Surrogate %Rec Qualifier Acceptance Limns

DCB DecaChiOrobfPhenyf�'- - ------ ------2T:'tS5 --- .--------....

TestAmerica Edison Page 44 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460·13139·1

Cliant Sample 10: TB·25-6

lab Sample 10: 460·13139·4 Date Sampled: 0511212010 1045

Client Matrix: Soli % Moislure: 12.8 Date Roceived: 0511312010 1830

8082 Polychlorinated Biphenyls {PCBs} by Gas Chromatography

2
Methed: 808 Analysis Batch: 460·37531 Instrument 10: PESTGC7
Preparation: 3541 Prep Balch: 460·37391 Inltial WeighWolume: 15.03 9
DlIutiQn; 1.0 Final WeighWolume: 10 ml
Date Analyzed: 0511412010 2032 Injection Volume:
Date Prepared: 0511412010 0719 Result Typo: SECONDARY

Surrogate °JoRec Qualifier Acceptance limits

-:::--T65���-"--"�=·��"-·-
DCB DecaChfOrobfPf\enYT··· ··-····-·97�-·· · 2
----"�--.-

-- 7

TeslAmerica Edison Page 45 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460·13139·1

Client Sample 10: TB·1 2·3

lab Sample ID: 460·131 39-5 Dale Sampled: 0511212010 1 1 25

Clienf Matrix: Soli % Moisture: 6.5 Date Received: 051131201 0 1830

8082 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography

Method: 8082 Analysis Batch: 460·37531 Instrument 10: PEST G C7

PreparaHon: 3541 Prep Batch: 460·37391 Initial WeTghtNolume: 1 5.02 9
Dilution: 1.0 Final WelghWolume: 1 0 mL
Date Analyzed: 0511412010 2048 Injection Volume:
Date Prepared: 0511412010 0719 Result Type: PRIMARY

Analyte DryWt Corrected: Y Result (ug/Kg) Qualifier MOL Rl

ArOCIOr101'S-' .. �--�.. - "" '''-
-- ''''''' 72-- --_·' u
-_.... ·· '''' '-14 -

Areclar 1221 72 u 22 72
Aroclor 1232 72 u 41 72
Aroclor 1242 72 u 14 72
Aroclar 1248 72 u 19 72
Aroclor 1254 72 u 24 72
Aroclar 1 260 72 u 8.0 72
Aroel.r 1 262 72 u 12 72
Aroclor 1268 72 u 12 72

%Rec QUalifier
" �"�A'_'________._

113

TestAmcr!ca Edison Page 46 o f 623 0 6 / 0 3 /2 0 1 0

 Analytical Data

Cllenl: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460·13139·1

Client Sample ID: TB·j 2-3

lab Sample 10: 460·13139·5 Dale Sampled: 0511212010 1 1 25

Client Matrix: Soil % Moisture: 6.5 Dale Reooived: 0511312010 1830

8082 Po'ychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromato9raphy

Melhod: 8082 Analysis Balch: 460·37531 Instrument ID: PESTGC7

Preparation: 3541 Prep Balch: 460·37391 lnilia! WeightNofume: 15.02 9
Dilution: 1,0 Final W6ightNo�l.Jme: 1 0 ml
Dale Analyzed: 0511412010 2048 tnjectfon Volume:
Date Prepared: 0511412010 0719 Result Type: SECONDARY

Qualifier
1%Rec limlls
M
---�7---��--" - --�----· ---��-�-.

TestAmerica Edison Page 47 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460·13139·1

Client Sample 10: TB·5 34

Lab Sample 10: 460·131 39·7 Date Sampled: 05/1212010 1230

Client MatrIx: Soil % Moisture: 61.5 Date Received: 05!l312010 1830

8082 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography

Method: B082 Analysis Batch: 460·37531 Instrument 10: PESTGC7

Preparatlon: 3541 Prep Batch: 460·37391 loilia! WeightNolume: 15.02 9
Dilution: 1.0 FInal WeighWolumo: 10 mL
Date Analyzed: 0511412010 2 1 2 1 Injection Volume:
Dale Prepared: 05/14/2010 0719 Result Type: PRtMARY

Analyle r W or ected Y MDL RL

��__ . _�y I � . .r. " __;. c
:. ; �._,,;,,�.� ��.,,:. ._ti'-".c;._ .�-;;-;:c.c
; .' �,.,;,
Aroclor 1 0 1 6 '
..__ •. __ •
. ____ ..
__ •.
'. _ •.
___ ___
�'..�'

Aroclor 1221 170 U S2 170

Aroclor 1232 170 U 99 170
Aroolor 1242 170 U 33 170
ArocloT 1248 170 U 46 170
Aroclof 1254 170 U 59 170
Aroclor 1260 170 U 19 170
Aroclor 1262 170 U 30 170
Aroclor 1268 170 U 30 170

TestAmerica Edison Page 4 8 of 623 06 /03/20l0

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associales Job Number: 460-13139-1

Client Sample 10: Ta-s 3-4

Lab Sample 10: 460-13139-7 Date Sampted: 0511212010 1 230

Client Matrix: Soli % Moisture: 61.5 Date ReooiVed: 0511 312010 1830

8082: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography

Method: 8082 Analysis Batch: 460-37531 1 nstrument JO: PESTGC7

Preparation: 3541 Prep Batch: 460-37391 lnitial WelghWolume: 15.02 9
Dilution: 1.0 Final WelghtNolume: 1 0 mL
Oat. Analyzed: 05114120 10 2121 injection Volume:
Dale Prepared: 0511412010 0719 Result Type: SECONDARY

%Rec Qualltier

TfJstAmerica Edison Page 4 9 of 6 2 3 06/03/2010

 A nalytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-1 31 39-1

Client Sample 10: TB 3 6·7

-

Lab Sample 10: 460·13139·2 Date Sampled: 05112120 1 0 0945

Client Matrix; Soil 1:1/0 Moisture: 18.8 Date Received: 0511312010 1830

6010B Metals {ICP}

Method: 60108 Analysis Balch: 460·37705 Instrument lD: 1CP4

Preparation: 30508 Prep Batch: 460-37477 Lab File ID: 05182010Atxt
DilUtion: 4.0 InHiat WeighWo!urno: 1 .06 9
Date Analyzed: 05!H1I20 1 0 1 1 55 Fina! WeighWolume: 5 0 ml
Date Prepared: 0511412010 1542

Analyte
Antimonym�""� __ �---�

Arsenic 1.9 0.81 1.2

Be'Yllium 0.20 J 0.20 0,46
CadmIum 1,2 U 0.18 1.2
Chromium 9.1 1.4 2.3
Copper 1 3,9 0.95 5.8
Lead 17.5 0.58 1.2
Nickel 7.0 J 0.62 9.3
Selenium 2,3 U 1.1 2.3
Sliver 2.3 U 0.18 2,3
Thallium 2.3 U 1.1 2.3
Zinc 31.3 1.1 7.0

7471A Me","ry (CVM)

Method: 7471A Analysis Batch: 460-374 72 Instrument ID: lEEMAN5

Preparation: 7471A Prep Balch: 460-37424 Lab File 10: 37424hg1.PRN
Dilution: 1.0 InlUal WeIghWolu me: 0,63 9
Da18 Analyzed: 0511412010 1 252 Final WeighWolume: 100 mL
Date Prepared: 051141201 0 0925

Analyte D'YWt Corrected: Y Result [mglKg) Qualifier MDl RL

' -· '-'�
O.039
._----_... ,,--

Mercuty U 0.030

TestAme(ica Edison Page 50 o f 623 06/03 / 2 0 1 0

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-131 39-1

Client Sample ID: Ta·25-6

Lab Sample 10: 460-13139-4 Date Sampled: 0511212010 1045

Client Matrix: Soil % Moisture: 12 8. Date Received: 0511 312010 1830

6010B Metals (ICP)

Method: 6010B Analysis Batch: 460·37705 Instrument ID: ICP4

Preparatlon: 3050B Prep Batch: 460-37477 Lab File 10: 0518201 0A.1xI
Dilution: 4.0 Inltiat WeightNolume: 1.00 9
Date Analyzed: 0511812010 1201 Final WeightNolume: 50 mL
Date Prepared: 0511412010 1542

D MOL
Analyl�
_ _�._ �..__ .. � � '!"".t C,,:r�,:I:<l.: .:r...
_. _.. __ �.ResuI11mfll.K�) Qualifier RL
Antimony 2,3
�.�_ .

Arsenic 4.5 0.80 .

1 1
Beryllium 0.37 J 0.20 0,46
Cadmium 0.98 J 0.1 8 1.1
Chromium 17.9 1.4 2.3
Copper 71.8 0.94 5,7
Lead 251 0,57 1.1
Nickel 1 1.9 0.61 9.2
Selenium U 1,1 2,3
2.3
Sifver 4.9 B 0,17 2,3
Thallium 2.3 U 1.1 2,3
Zinc 137 1,1 6,9

7471A Mercury (CVM)

Method: 7471A Analysis Batch: 460·37472 Instrument 10: LEEMAN5

Preparation: 7471A Prep Batch: 460·37424 tab File ID: 37424hg1.PRN
Dllution: 1.0 In1tial WelghtIVolume: 0.64 9
Date Analyzed: 051141201 0 1255 Final WelghtlVolume: 100 mL
Oate Prepared: 051141201 0 0925

Anatyle DryWt Corrected: Y Rosult (mglKg) Qualifier MOL RL

��O -�
Mercury ,22 " -��-O:628 ..
_..._.__...

TestAmerica Edison Page 5 1 of 6 2 3 0 6 / 0 3 /2010

 Analytical Data

Client Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-131 39-1

Client Sample 10: TB-1 2-3

Lab Sample 10; 460-13139·5 Date Sampled; 0511212010 1125

Client Matrix: Soil % Moisture: 6.5 Dale Received; 0511 312010 1830

60108 Melals (ICP)

Method: 6010B Analysis Batch: 460·37705 Instrument 10: ICP4
Preparation: 3050B Prep Balch: 460-37477 lab File 10: 0518201 0A.ixt
Dilution: 4.0 Initial WeighWo!ume: 1.06 9
Dale Analyzed: 0511812010 1204 Final W€lightNolume: 50 mL
Date Prepared: 0511412010 1542

An.lyle DryWl Corrected: Y MOL RL

Antlffio
'ny ,--�-.-�-�--------------- -

Arsenic 1.4 0.70 1.0

Beryllium 0.40 u 0.18 0.40
Cadmium 1.0 u 0.16 1.0
Chromium 4.6 1.2 2.0
Copper 7.2 0.82 5.0
Lead 7.9 0.50 1.0
Nickel 5.4 J 0.54 8.1
Selenium 2.0 U 0.94 2.0
STIver 2.0 U 0.15 2.0
Thallium 2.0 U 0.98 2.0
Zinc 19.2 0.99 6.1

7471A Mercury (CVAA)

Method: 7471A Analysis Balch: 460-37472 InstrumentlD: LEEMAN5

Preparation: 7471A Prep Balch: 460·37424 Lab File ID: 37424hgl .PRN
Dilution: 1.0 Initial WelghUVolume: 0.60 9
Date Analyzed: 0511412010 1226 Final WelghUVolume: 100 mL
Date Prepared: 0511412010 0925

Analyte DryWt Correc1ed: Y Result (mglKg) Qualifier MDL RL

�_��'_ 7�__ . ..... ··· 0.Q35 �------- -ir- -
Mercury

TestAmerica Edison Page 52 of 623 06/0 3/2010

 Analytical Oata

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460·13139·1

Client Sample 10: lB·5 3-4

Lab Samp le 10: 460·13139-7 Date Sampled: 0511212010 1230

Client Matrix: Soli % Moisture: 61.5 Date Reooived: 0511312010 1830

6010B Metats (tep)

Method: 6010B Analysis Batch: 460�37705 Instrument 10; ICP4

Preparation: 3050B Prep Batch: 460·31477 lab File 10: 05182010A.!xl
D Uulto n: 4.0 inmal WeightNo!ume: 1.02 9
Date Analyzed: 05118/2010 1210 Final WeighWolume: 50 mL
Date Prepared: 05/1412010 1542

Analyte DI)'Wt Corrected: Y Resull (mgIKg) Qualifler MOL RL

-�,-�--� ..-.�
..._. '�--. - �. . . . .�. · �-� ·5�1
�·- . -��. . .�

Antimony �t.i-
Arsenic 3.2 1.8 2.5
Beryllium 1.0 U 0.45 1.0
Cadmium 1.1 J 0.40 2.5
Chromium 6.1 3.0 5.1
Copper 22.0 2.1 12.1
Lead 222 1.3 2.5
Nickel 1.0 J 1.4 20.4
Setonl um 5.1 U 2.4 5.1
SIlver 5.1 U 0.39 5.1
Thallium 5.1 U 2.5 5.1
Zinc 152 2.5 15.3

1411A Mereu'Y (CVAA)

Method: 7411A Analysis Batch: 460�37472 fnslrument 10: LEE MANS

Preparation: 1411A Prep Batch: 460-31424 Lab File ID: 31424hgl.PRN
[)jlution: 1.0 Inltlal WofghtNo!ume: 0.63 9
Date Analyzed: 05/14/2010 1259 Final WelghtNolume: 100 mL
Date Prepared: 05/14120 10 0925

Analyte DI)'WI Corrected: Y Result (mgIKg) Qual iflOr MOL RL

Meroory
" - �-�" .-.--

o.31� - ··�-·-·-

TestAmerica Edison Page S3 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Clienl: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460·131 39·1

Generaf Chemistry

Client Sample 10: TB·3 2·3

Lab Sample to: 460·1 3 1 39·1 Date Sampled: 0511212010 0900

CHent Matrix: Soil Dale Received: 0511312010 1830

Result DII Method

»-
17.9 - - -. ··1·,O·-�-�M·oTsIure -"----
Analysis Batch: 460·37508 Date Analyzed: 0511412010 2147 DryWt Correclod: N
Percent Solids 82.1 % 1.0 1.0 1,0 MoIsture
Analysis Batch: 460·37508 Dale Analyzed: 0511 412010 2147 Orywt Corrected: N

TestAmerica EdisDn Page 54 of 623 0 6/0 3/2 0 1 0

 Analytical D ata

Client Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

General Chemistry

Client Sample 10: TB-3 6-7

Lab Sample ID: 460-13139-2 Dale Sampled: 051121201 0 0945

Client MatriX: S01l Dale Received: 0511312010 1 830

Analyte Result Qual Units Rl RL Dil Method

1':O�'�'-'Moislure
-.- - . .. . .•.. .

Percent Moisture % 1.0

Analysis Balch: 460-37508 Date Analyzed: 0511412010 2147 DryWt Corrected: N

Percent Solids 81_2 % 1.0 1.0 1.0 Moisture

Analysis Batch: 460-37508 Dale Analyzed: 0511412010 2147 DryWl Corrected: N

TestAmerica Edison Page 55 of 623 0 6 / 0 3/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

General Chemistry

Client Sample 10: TB·22-3

lab Sample ID: 460-131 39-3 Data Sampled: 05112120 10 1030

ellent Matrix; SolT Date Received: 0511312010 1830

Analyle Resull Qual Units Rl RL Dil Melhod

�'. '----
·perconCMolsiuro "- . ,-o; .� .. �-..•. •..�..... .. % ·,··;:-_·········· ······7·.-····
1.0�-��r",olS;iUre· ·
Analysis Balch: 460-37508 Date Analyzed: 0511412010 2147 DryWI Corrected: N
Percent Solids 86.1 % 1.0 1.0 to Moisture
Analysis Batch: 460-37508 Date Analyzed : 051141201 0 2147 DryWt Correcled: N

TestAmerica Edison Pag.. 56 of 623 06/03/2 0 1 0

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-13139-1

General Chemistry

Client Sample ID: TB-25·6

Lab Sample 10: 460-131 39-4 Date Sampled: 0511212010 1045

Client Matrix: Soil Date Received: 05113/2010 1830

Analyte Result
128 - Qual Units RL RL Oil Method
Percent "Mo'i'sture-- " Moistu re
-�- - -'- -
---�.�.--- ----- ��-- --�-�-- --.--.----�.-- .�_.�---�_._ ._._��_._--"----'"_..__ .-
" --,,--. -�--. -
_ % 1.0 1.0 1.0
Analysis Batch: 460-37508 Date Analyzed: 0511412010 2147 DryWt Corrected: N
Percent Solids 87.2 % 1.0 1.0 1.0 Moisture
Analysis Batch: 460-37508 Date Analyzed: 0511412010 2147 DryWt Corrected: N

TestAmerica Edison Page 57 of 623 0 6 /03/ 2 0 1 0

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 46()·131 39-1

G(fneral Chemistry

Client SampJe 10: TB·1 2·3

Lab Sample 10; 480·j3139-5 Dale Sampled: 0511212010 1 1 25

Client Mamx: Soil Dale Received: 051131201 0 1830

Aoalyte Resul t Quat lIniis RL RL Oil Method

"p;"oonTMolSture 6,5 Moisture
Analysis Balch: 460·37508 Date Analyzed: 0511 412010 2147 DryWt Correded: N
Percent Sol1ds 93.5 % 1.0 1.0 1.0 Moisture
Analysis Batch: 460-37508 Date Analyzed: 0511412010 2147 DryWt Corrected� N

TestAmerlea Edison Page 58 of 6 2 3 0 6 / 0 3 /2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield As sociales Job Number: 460-131 39-1

General Chemistry

CHent Sample 10: TB-1 5·6

Lab Sample ID: 460·13139·6 Dale Sampled: 05/12/20 1 0 1 1 45

Client Matrix: Soil Date Received: 05113/2010 1830

Analyte ResuU Qual Units RL RL Oil Method

, - ---- -- ' - ------------- - - - -----,-- �-----,-------------- -,------------ ._-----------

Percent Moisture
�-�-- ----,--

1 1 .9 % 1 .0 1.0 1 .0 MoIsture
Analysis Balch: 460-37508 Dale Analyzed: 05/14/2010 2147 DryWI Corrected: N
Percent Solids 88.1 % 1.0 1.0 1 .0 MoIsture
Analysis Balch: 460·37508 Date Analyzed: 05/14/2010 2147 DryWt Corrected: N

TestAmerica Edison Page 5 9 of 623 06/03/2010

 Analytical Data

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460-131 39-1

General Chemistry

Ctrent Sampte 10: TB-5 34

lab Sampl e 10: 460-13139-7 Date Sampled: 05/1212010 1 230

Client Matrix: Soil Dale Received: 0511312010 1830

Analyte Result Qual Units RL RL 011 Melhod

"Percont "Moisture 1.0 1.0 Moisturo
Analysis Batch: 460·37639 Date Analyzed: 0511712010 1956 DryWt C o rrecled: N
Percent Solids 38.5 % 1.0 1.0 1.0 Moisture
Analysis Batch: 460·37639 Date Analyzed: 0511712010 1956 DryWI Corrected: N

TestAmerica Edison Page 6 0 of 6 2 3 06/03/2010

 Analytical Oata

Client: Duffield Associates Job Number: 460·13139·1

General Chemistry

Client Sample 10; TB-4 6·7

Lab Sample 10: 460·131 39·8 Dale Sampled: 05/1212010 1340

Client Matrix: SOn Dale Received: 05/1312010 1830

Analyle Result Qual Units RL RL Of! Melhoo

. ����, .�-�".��-,

Percent Moisture 16:3 - - - �- -o/;---- - 1.0

Analysis Balch: 460·37508 Dale Analyzed: 05114/2010 2147 DryWl Carrectoo: N
Percent Sollds 83.7 %
1.0 1.0 1,0 Moisture
Analysis Balch: 460·37508 Date Analyzed: 0511412010 2147 D""Wt Corrected: N

TestAmerica Edison Page 6l. of 623 06/03 /20l.0