January 4 2008

Andree Leduc
Commission For Public Complaints Against the RCMP

Re: Your Files PC-2007-2316

PC-2007-2317

Request for an immediate review of my complaint against the RCMP whereas RCMP
Commissioner William Elliot is in non compliance with the RCMP Act as defined on page 2

Step 1 is to an immediate public hearing with the initiative to a PUBLIC ENQIRY (see page 42)

Whereas I filed a complaint regarding the refusal of the RCMP to investigate Government
corruption and conspiracy evidence on my web sites.

http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

His refusal to cooperate in compliance with the RCMP Act is consistent with my complaint against
2 members of the RCMP refusing to investigate the Government corruption and conspiracy

I have attached pertinent evidence of the RCMP refusal and non compliance with the RCMP Act

This document is published on the aforesaid guardians ……web site where the evidence
is irrefutable of the conspiracy and the RCMP Commissioner’s refusal to comply with the
RCMP Act implicating him in the government conspiracy.

Please take appropriate action as defined on page 42

Please acknowledge receipt. of this document.

Thank you
Frank Gallagher

1
January 3 2008

Stockwell Day
Minister of Public Safety
Ottawa, Canada K1A 0P8

It has been two months to the day since I responded (see pages 6-17) to the e-mail you sent me November 2
2007 dated October 2 g 2007 (see pages 12-13).
When you didn’t respond immediately I sent you another e-mail November 5 2007 (see pages 18-27)

You still have not responded to these e-mails which perhaps explains why the RCMP Commissioner William
Elliot has not sent me a status report which was due in compliance with the RCMP Act on or about December
16 2007 according to the November 8 2007 letter I received from Andree Leduc of the Commission for Public
Complaints Against the RCMP (see page 3)

On January 2 2008 I e-mailed the RCMP Commissioner requesting the status report ASAP (see pages 2-4)

I suspect the delay involves you, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Robert Nicholson
and Prime Minister Stephen Harper but should you not be aware of his tardiness to comply with the Act I
thought it prudent to inform you so that you may look into the matter since you stated in your e-mail
“As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must
ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions and the fundamental
rights and freedoms of Canadians.” and then went on to say ( see page 12)
“The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and accountability and is taking action to
ensure government business is conducted in a responsible manner.”

I had serious doubt and mentioned that in my November 3rd and 5th and in fact that is what the purpose of this
entire exercise is about which has caused me to publish the evidence on my web site.

Nothing has changed since the enactment of the Federal Accountability Act, 2006 simply because
deception is traditionally your forte and modus operandi as Confucius said

“There were no dates in this history but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY,,, finally I began to make out what was written between
the lines: the whole volume was filled with the single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”

Please take the initiative to comply with the law NOW in appropriate manner, not as you are wont to do.

An immediate response acknowledging receipt of this email accompanied with a statement that you will
endeavor to cooperate in a manner consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights is requested and expected. The status report please.

Frank Gallagher
2
January 2 2008

RCMP Commissioner
William Elliot
webmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Re: Professional Standards Unit

File # 2007-1355445

Dear Commissioner

On November 8 2007 I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
complaining that 2 members of the RCMP refused to investigate Government corruption and
conspiracy evidence on my web sites
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
and http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

I received acknowledgement from them dated November 8 2007 Files # PC-2007-2316 and
PC-2007-2317 stating in accordance with the RCMP Act they had forwarded my complaint to
you for appropriate action and you are required to acknowledge receipt of my complaint
within 45 days of receiving it and then provide me a status report every 30 days thereafter.
(See page 2)

I received acknowledgement of receipt dated November 16 2007 from the RCMP

Professional Standards Unit (see page 3)

It appears to me I should have received a status report from you dated December 16 2007 at
the latest making it well over due.

I would appreciate that status report ASAP please

Thank You

Frank Gallagher
3
4
5
6
November 3, 2007

Minister of Public Safety

Hon. Stockwell Day
Day.S@parl.gc.ca

Dear Stockwell Day

I very much appreciate the letter signed by you however informative it does
not address the issues.

A Public Inquiry is most definitely required on the public side, point of

view as these puppet Task Forces only address the issues of continuity in
covering up the conspiracy against the people perpetrated by the Attorney
General's Office and ultimately the government of Canada, all at the tax
payers expense

I have watched you on CPAC and have had good vibes about you, but
unfortunately sanity tells me the smoother you are the further you will
climb in the government ranks but I also allow for naïve ignorance too as
the police believing they are quite intelligent as they are told at the
beginning of their careers that the law has nothing to do with common sense
which should be the first clue as they train to be ignorant detectives.

They just fall in line and when controversial topics come up like mine they
consult with the Attorney General or his agents, Crown Attorneys but
ultimately they must lay the charges and in the issues I have addressed the
Ontario Attorney General is the major player in the conspiracy against the
people which the evidence I have accumulated over the passed 2 years
irrefutably proves which I am sure you are well aware of.

This would be a venture into incurable absurdity questioning Michael Bryant

if it is okay to charge him with conspiracy and treason. It is quite
possible he would say sure go ahead and then when the ball is in his court
he can decide whether or not to prosecute himself, for he gets the final
decision.

Anyway what would be the point of consulting with the Attorney General who
would obviously state I was confused and didn’t have a clue about the law
and if the cops had the slightest understanding other than what they are
told and what they see happen in court over and over again as their officers
crawl away with their heads between their toes frustrated as hell knowing
full well the evidence met the criteria of common sense which they still
haven’t got the grasp of the law being nothing to do with common sense.

How the hell can laws be obeyed if they have nothing to do with common sense
and who benefits when that is the case other than lawyers who have infested
the whole legal system with the people trusting that they will keep an eye
on each other when in fact the people should have each others backs watching
the every move of these crooks as they ravish the moral civilization as they
sleep peacefully in trust.

Sure at the moment it seems like I have ventured into a trek of superfluous
futility greater than the challenge Christopher Columbus had getting ships
to prove the world was round but it was an eventuality that had to happen
simply because the world is round, spherical to be more correct.

7
You know as well as I do the evidence I have is irrefutable and if it ever
gets out to the public it will be supported by everything in reality and
obviously due the most serious nature of the issues you people are quite
confident it will never see the light of day and should there be signs of it
nearing the light my lights will be turned off which is no particular
concern to me being an old 65 with my eventuality approaching in any event.

That fact alone must surely tell you I am not addressing the issues for me
or financial gain but for the purpose that is long over due being done and
if not for so many fitting circumstances that perchanced upon me I would be
golfing, fishing and whatever my perceptions would be of the heavenly thing
to partake in.

My Dick and Janeing you people is so obvious to Spot as is your responses

which may appear intelligent alone but when related to the evidence and the
issues you address are abundantly incompetent to the test and yet obviously
would be judged by the system in place as sane in the insane world you
people have created.

The evidence which I have presented you all proves irrefutably it would go
nowhere in the present illegal system but a jury of the people could cause a
most serious ruckus which is definitely not my intention for I am a sane and
moral person who has kept his head when all around have lost theirs.

Do you have any idea what it feels like to be the only sane person in the
world and when the term common sense is used it is in reference to my way of
thinking.

Sure it is a high improbability that I will get the information out and
perchance I do I will probably be certified insane but history will know the
document to mean I was sane as they peruse the insanity of the intelligence
of man induced by the government to ransack us poor ignorant fools.

I will tend to go on hoping to strike a chord perchance there is one amongst

you who would pick up on the necessity of giving sanity a chance before it
is too late which is quite possibly already a wee bit too late.

Well enough of the rambling for now as I bring your attention to the 2
attachments which I have already circulated the Do your part.doc file.

I now make it abundantly clear that I want you to address the issues within
these documents, the aforesaid and the “Boomerang Democracy Resolve” FFF,
Forthright, Forthcoming, Forthwith consistent with The Law, the supreme law
of Canada, the Constitution Act 1982 whereas 25 years ago the individual’s
Charter Rights and Freedoms were guaranteed by the Federal government but
they have not put a modus operandi in place conducive to the guarantee and
in fact have put a system in place conducive to the members of the Law
Society of Upper Canada who hold every position in the legal system who the
Law Society adamantly state or imply their members do not give a damn about
the individuals guaranteed Charter Rights which my evidence irrefutably
attests to.

Our Rights are guaranteed and are attached to the individual as an arm and a
leg yet it’s like pulling teeth to access them.

The lawyers charge us every time we care to access what is already ours and
the system is too costly making justice prohibitive for the moral majority.

8
The people finance the system to protect us as per our Charter Rights and
then charge us individually when we try to access the system which is a
venture into futility trying to find justice from members of the Law Society
who don’t give a damn about our Charter Rights

Now what the hell is that all about?

Yes, I am requesting a response to that question most

definitely
The lawyers have built an empire from our tax money for their benefit and
the evidence is everywhere in reality and irrefutable within the contents of
my writings which the people whose e-mails are listed below have received.

I have also requested on many occasions, an answer to a very simple question

from the prominent people in matters of law whose e-mail addresses you will
also find on page 15 of the Do your part.doc which now includes your
Day.S@parl.gc.ca address.

I ask you all once again what the entity “threshold” means in matters of the
law you people administer and enforce in Canada.

In particular I would like to know what the term “threshold” means in

reference to the evidence I presented to you all in the Toronto Sun document
dated October 8 2006 which the York Regional Police and Randy Craig of the
OPP Anti-Rackets refer to as the invisible delineator which the judge pulls
from his or her hat to determine that my irrefutable evidence did not chin
the line considered to be the “threshold” which determines whether or not
they can commence or cause to commence proceedings in the provincial courts?

The answer is obvious as is the no response to the question as is the

refusal of all the aforesaid people to bring the issues I have addressed to
the public’s attention.

I request each and every individual whose e-mail address is on page 15 of

the attached document, “Do your part.doc(582KB)” to please respond to the
“threshold” question

The playing intelligently ignorant option has worn thin so I suggest

demonstrating another one of your initiatives to appear FFF.

Oh, it would be prudent to mention that the (4) Click on Preamble Federal correspondence
Recap October 9 2007 on page 11 of the Do your part.doc which is to be found on my web
site Guardians of the Canadians Charter of Rights and Freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-
freedoms quite convincing that you all were provided the opportunity to prove your
indifference to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights was fiction rather than truly the
Attorney General’s fiction which is in laymen terms conspiracy and treason when the people
willingly refuse to generously suspend their disbelief as per page 2 of the document behind the
black bar which is to be found on page 8 of the aforesaid Do your part.doc

9
I state once again as I have many times before, Do not befuddle the
befuddlement any further insulting the intelligence of our right to be
ignorant of the fiction of the traditionally unscrupulous ways of the
members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who are so bloody arrogant in
their belief they are superior to God in their most devilish ways.

Hon Stockwell Day

By all means inform me as to who else agrees with the no need for a Public
Inquiry into the RCMP pension fund scandal which was linked to the upper
command and the DOJ

I noticed you copied your response to the DOJ confirming for me that he is
aware of the issues and the media confirms for me that he has done nothing
to address these issues which are of a most serious nature which Louis
Theoret, Federal Ombudsman of Victims of Crime understands which you will
read in the
Preamble Federal correspondence Recap October 9 2007 document

Clearly the DOJ, Department of Justice

He closed the file leaving predictable victims at the mercy of the

conspiracy.

With reference to your following statement with full respect for Canada’s
democratic traditions I dare say Canada’s democratic traditions are passe’
as of 1982 when the individual’s Rights were guaranteed by the Charter
necessitating a revamp of the legal system so as to be competent to back the
guarantee consistent with and conducive to the provisions of the Charter

You state you are accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must
ensure the Force functions with full respect for the fundamental rights and freedoms of
Canadians and clearly the evidence shows that Sgt. Michael Thomson of the RCMP was
provided copies of Lawyer Files 1-14, 13A of which lawyer File # 14 was addressed to him
dated April 7 2007 which he has refused to respond to.

On October 18 2007 I and my mother went to the RCMP office on Harry Walker Blvd. south
of Davis drive with a prodigious amount of evidence which included copies of the 15 Lawyer
Files, the 73 page letter to the Toronto Sun dated October 8 2006 and a copy of the Dave
Grech compiled correspondence September 1 2007 and a copy of the recording of the Tribunal
hearing which irrefutably proves that Don Wilson filed a false and misleading information
with the ORHT valued at $43,000 + which is an offense under S.206 (2) of the Tenant
protection Act, 1997 and committed the criminal act of fraud over $100,000 in a public
building financed by the people of Ontario to administer justice to and for the people in
compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and the criminal code of the Constitution
Act, 1982.

Sgt Steinebeck met with us for about an hour and declined to take the evidence, which I had
brought because the RCMP web site stated they would not accept evidence by e-mail which I
had provided all the evidence to Sgt Michael Thomson by e-mail but he had declined to
respond to it.

10
Sgt.Steinebech admitted he knew of me when I questioned him about a half hour into our
meeting and he went on to state that he already had copies of all the documents I had brought
because they had received them by e-mail and opened a file for them.

So the big question is why have they not commenced or caused to commence proceedings
against Rick Hennessey, Regional Director of the ORHT as per Lawyer File # 1, of tampering
with the evidence and refusing to file the afore mentioned charges against Don Wilson which
makes Rick Hennessey guilty of Obstruction of a landlord in pursuit of his rights under s. 206
(1) of the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and obstruction of justice in the matter of the criminal
act of fraud under the Constitution Act 1982.

Dave Grech of the Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs
also declined to file the charges as above and referred to in Lawyer File # 2 addressed to him.

Hon. John Gerretsen Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing also refused to commence or
cause to commence proceedings on these issues as addressed to him in Lawyer File # 3
making him guilty of the same charges as above and more as referred to in the said Lawyer
File # 3 which also includes matters of non consistencies with the Constitution.

The evidence also points to the same charges against the Attorney General Michael Bryant in
Lawyer File # 7 and conspiracy against the people along with other matters regarding non
compliance with the Constitution Act, 1982.

Everyone else referenced in the 15 Lawyer Files are also guilty of conspiracy against the
people and obstruction of justice under the Constitution Act 1982,
They have all received the evidence and have also been informed that should they have
misplaced it they can find it on my web site Guardians of the Canadians Charter of Rights and
Freedoms http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-
and-freedoms

So you see “As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public
for the RCMP and must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s
democratic traditions and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.”

I believe you are accountable to the public for the RCMP failure to function with full respect
for my Charter Rights and Freedoms which are truly fundamental.

I take you at your word that you will ensure that the RCMP functions consistent with the
Constitution and conducive to my guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms and every
other individual of Canada whose guaranteed protection is dependent on punishment due the
crime attentive to deterrence which is the first line of defense in the guaranteed protection of
the people.

If you should require any more evidence than that which has been provided to Sgt. Michael
Thomson of the RCMP please do not hesitate to request by e-mail at franklyone@hotmail.com

11
I trust you understand the serious nature of the issues regarding the conspiracy by the Attorney
General Michael Bryant and the evidence irrefutably proves the Ontario Government does not
have a modus operandi in place capable of backing the individual’s Charter Rights and
Freedoms and in fact the modus operandi in place is conducive to the benefit of the lawyers
and criminal element extremely detrimental to the moral majority.

Once again I state the evidence is all available on my web site Guardians of the Canadians
Charter of Rights and Freedoms http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-
canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms where you will find links to 9 other web sites
which contain the irrefutable evidence of the Attorney General conspiracy.

A Public Inquiry is in order and I request you do so FFF

Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher
Cc

Day.S@parl.gc.ca
victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca;Michael.Thomson@rcmp-rc.gc.ca;prevention@ps.gc.ca;randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca;
communications@ps.gc.ca;McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca;bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; brooksn@scc-
csc.gc.ca;bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org;
bob.runciman@pc.ola.org;bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca;baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;comail@lsuc.ca;citytvhosts@citytv.com;citydesk@
tor.sunpub.com;city@thestar.ca;
christine.elliott@pc.ola.org;cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca;dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca;dinovoc-
qp@ndp.on.ca;dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca;dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca;debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca;dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca;
dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca;editor@rd.ca;editor@tor.sunpub.com;elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca;ernie.harde
man@pc.ola.org;fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca;frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca;fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca;
fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca;fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca;gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca;grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;goldsy@sen.parl.gc.ca;gilla@sen.par
l.gc.ca;gautht@sen.parl.gc.ca;gcarlino@ombudsman.on.ca;hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca;
hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca;haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca;harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca;joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca;johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;jaffem@sen.
parl.gc.ca;jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca;julia.munroco@pc.ola.org;kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca;
kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca;kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca;

lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca;losier@sen.parl.gc.ca;lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca;lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca;communications@ps.gc.ca;mcgee
d@sen.parl.gc.ca;munsoj@sen.parl.gc.ca;moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca;mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca;merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca;mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca;
mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca;massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca;nejmcust@mms.org;nimhinfo@nih.gov;
mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca;nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca;
onbox@ps.gc.ca;olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;pm@pm.gc.ca;pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca;prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca;poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca;
poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca;phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca;pkormos-
qp@ndp.on.ca;stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca;stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca;stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca;spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithd@sen.parl.gc.
ca;
sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca;szwebmaster@yahoo.com;tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca;tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca;vanlop0
@parl.gc.ca;vanlop1@parl.gc.ca;web@ps.gc.ca;webadmin@justice.gc.ca;wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca;
zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca; info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca

rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; cbentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org;

jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org; gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org;gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org;bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org;

12
warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org;Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca;
Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;

MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca; Day.S@parl.gc.ca;

Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;Toews.V@parl.gc.ca;Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca; Finley.D@parl.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca;
OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca; Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca;
Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca; Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca;
Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca; Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;dwatch@web.net;info@ocsj.ca;
ocap@tao.ca;info@olderwomensnetwork.org; terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca;
justice@socialjustice.org;info@chfc.ca
sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca;
potterl@scc-csc.gc.ca;phil.jensen@servicecanada.gc.ca;AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; josee.dubois@psst-tdfp.gc.ca;
elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca; mmacpherson@pco-bcp.gc.ca; dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca;
aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca; clgascon@fja.gc.ca; plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; francois-giroux@cas-
satj.gc.ca;bob.ward@chrc-ccdp.cadp.ca

Minister of Public Safety

Ministre de a Sécurité publique
Ottawa, Canada K1A 0P8
OCT 2 g 2007

Mr. Frank Gallagher

frank.gaIIaghersympatico.ca

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

Thank you for your correspondence of July 19, 2007, regarding the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police (RCMP) pension fund as well as your concerns that rights under the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms are not being protected. I apologize for the delay in responding.
As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP
and must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions
and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.

The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and accountability and is

taking action to ensure government business is conducted in a responsible manner. In order to
deliver on its commitment to make Government more accountable, on April 11, 2006,
Canada’s new Government introduced the Federal Accountability Act, which received Royal
Assent on December 12, 2006. Through this Act, the Government of Canada has introduced
specific measures to help strengthen accountability and increase transparency and oversight in
Government operations. To clarify roles and responsibilities, the Federal Accountability Act
designates Deputy Ministers and Deputy Heads such as the Commissioner of the RCMP as
accounting officers who are accountable before the appropriate committee of Parliament to
answer questions related to their responsibilities.
Canada
-2-
The RCMP is an important national institution that plays a significant role in the safety and
security of Canadians; ensuring public trust and confidence is an important component of
achieving that role. Canada’s new Government has taken a number of recent steps in respect of
this important national institution.

13
On April 13, 2007, Mr. David Brown was appointed to lead an independent investigation into
allegations relating to the RCMP pension and insurance plans. The mandate for this
investigation gave Mr. Brown the flexibility to recommend whether a more formal inquiry was
necessary to address any outstanding questions. In his report, submitted to the Government on
June 15, 2007, Mr. Brown recommended that no formal inquiry was necessary. I have closely
reviewed Mr. Brown’s report and have accepted all of his recommendations.
On July 16, 2007, the Government announced the creation of a five-member Task Force on
Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP, to be chaired by Mr. David Brown. In
addition to the appointment of Mr. Brown as Chair, Linda Black, Richard Drouin, Norman
Inkster, and Larry Murray — each with varied expertise and experience — have been
appointed as members of the Task Force. The Task Force will make recommendations to
improve management and accountability within the RCMP, and will report back to the
Government by the end of 2007.
Furthermore, the appointment of William J.S. Elliott as the new Commissioner of the RCMP,
with a career that has been marked with distinction as well as expertise in the area of national
security, will provide the RCMP with the renewed leadership that it critically needs at this
time.
With respect to the criminal allegations under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 mentioned in
your letter, please note that criminal matters in Ontario fall within the purview of the
Honourable Michael Bryant, Attorney General of Ontario. You may therefore wish to raise
your concerns with his office, using the contact information provided below:

Ministry of the Attorney General

McMurtry-Scott Building
720 Bay Street, 11th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5G 2K1
Telephone: 416-326-2220

-3-
With respect to your concerns about the application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms, I have taken the liberty of forwarding a copy of your correspondence to my
colleague the Honourable Rob Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada,
for his information and consideration. In addition, a copy of your correspondence has been
forwarded to Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner.
I regret that I cannot help in the way you had perhaps hoped, but wish you well in resolving
your concerns.
Yours sincerely,
c.c.: The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Q.C.
Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner
Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety

14
I am well aware of the Federal Accountability Act,2006 and in fact have
written the Prime Minister Stephen Harper, providing him with evidence which
his office responded hoping I understand why his office can not get
involved.

I do not understand why his office can not get involved unless of course his
office is involved with the conspiracy which clearly the evidence shows must
be by not getting involved.

A copy of his Office’s e-mail can be found in the Government Correspondence

compiled September 1 2007 which is referenced in the afore said Preamble
Federal correspondence Recap October 9 2007 document

The afore mentioned document clearly shows: the Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C.,
M.P. Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada has been informed along with
everyone else who I have mentioned and clearly nothing has been done to address these most
serious issues.

You yourself Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety are aware that The
Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P. Minister of Justice and Attorney General of
Canada has been informed as you clearly state in your response to me dated November 2 2007
and a copy is hereto copied immediately above with the date incorrectly noted OCT 2 g
2007

Clearly the DOJ is implicated in this conspiracy as well as the RCMP Pension Fund scandal
which the Standing Committee of Public Accounts was ordered to sit on.

You have also Cc Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Q.C. Conflict of Interest and Ethics
Commissioner and the records show I have already been there, done that but her Office had no
authority to deal with the issues.

Your letter of November 2 2007 confirms everything I state that you people do nothing other
than a dog chasing its tail which certainly appears busy and attentive to something but if it
weren’t for the coincidental consistent movement of head and tail its head would be found
stuffed firmly up its ass.

The evidence is clear that the Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP,
to be chaired by Mr. David Brown. In addition to the appointment of Mr. Brown as Chair,
Linda Black, Richard Drouin, Norman Inkster, and Larry Murray will accomplish absolutely
nothing other than to appear as if they are benefiting the public as is the Fiction of the
Attorney General which does nothing but provide members of the Law Society with luxurious
benefit to the colossal waste of tax payers money.

The accountability and responsibility has already been defined in the “Roles and
Responsibilities of the Attorney General” on the Ontario Attorney General web site and
common law and common sense demands the guarantor of the guarantee to the individual’s
Charter Rights and Freedoms as provided in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is
the responsible and accountable party to back the guarantee which is the Federal Government

15
and clearly The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P. Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada is mandated with that obligation.

If not he, then who?

That seems to be the gazzilion $ question.

“The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and
accountability and is taking action to ensure government business is
conducted in a responsible manner.”

BULLSHIT

To cite a man of wisdom from 2500 years ago ….Confucius says

“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across
every page were the words BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY….finally I
began to make out what was written between the lines; the whole volume was
filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”

Mr. Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety

On this 3rd day of November 2007 under the authority of the Constitution Act, 1982
(Document) with due regard to Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms charge you
to uphold your responsibility to which you will be held accountable by the people.
“As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the
RCMP and must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic
traditions and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.”

The RCMP have been provided the evidence as have you and all the people whose e-mail
addresses I have provided and I insist on behalf of the people that you commence or cause to
commence proceedings for the restructuring of the antiquated legal system that has been
superseded by the 1982 enactment of the Constitution which demands a modus operandi
consistent with and conducive to the guarantee of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms.

Common sense and all that’s sane demands government personnel be irreproachable in this
endeavor FFF, Forthright, Forthcoming, Forthwith and I will tentatively presume you are the
man for this most significant job in this moment of time in history where it is absolutely vital
to the well being and safety of the people of Canada

As Minister of Public Safety Mr. Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. it is incumbent upon you to lead
the way in the interests of each and every person in Canada who is individually guaranteed
Rights as provided by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom and you must do so with
integrity, fortitude and conviction FFF attentive to, consistent with and conducive to the
guarantee to each and every individual of Canada as per the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms.

16
The present legal system is extraordinarily incompetent to that endeavor to the humongous
waste of tax dollars to the horrific detriment to the people of Canada who finance the system
for their benefit of a moral society under the supremacy of God.

It matters not if you believe God exists or ever did for when you have exercised your
responsibilities under the supremacy of God we will all be believers as the spirit of God and
the spirit of The Law is one and the same.

I reiterate a continuity of the befuddlement will not be tolerated giving due cause to commence
proceedings against every individual of the present government personnel who has been
granted authority under the Constitution to administer and enforce it consistent with and
conducive to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom consistent with the aspirations
attributed to God clearly defined in

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms

1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set
out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably
justified in a free and democratic society.

2.
Every
one
has
the
follo
wing
funda
ment
al
freed
oms:
(a)
freed
om of
consc
ience
and
religi
on;
(b)
freed
om of
thoug
ht,
belief

17
,
opini
on
and
expre
ssion,
inclu
ding
freed
om of
the
press
and
other
medi
a of
comm
unica
tion;
(c)
freed
om of
peace
ful
asse
mbly;
and
(d)
freed
om of
assoc
iation
.

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be
deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental
or physical disability.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the
inconsistency, of no force or effect.

18
Whatever the cost to the taxpayer to this endeavor will be money most well
spent.

I remind you attentiveness to efficiency and effect is demanded as per

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to
be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

The public have been deprived for far too long and it to this endeavor I do not see the
benefit to dwelling on the past which the legal system has a firm grip on which has been
long stretched and an immediate release will propel us far into the future.

I have been FFF and I would expect and respect to be responded to in kind.

Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher

PS
Your immediate attention is required

Are you the man for this most significant challenge?

Answer would be most gratefully appreciated

19
Stockwell Day oomerang
Politician
Men’s natures are alike; it is their habits that carry them far apart
Politician’s perspective
How difficult to find the words to once and for
ever make the people understand our plight to keep
the avarice sated while satiating the peon providers
with carrots of dreams potentially possible but
impossible due the likes of us.
The ignorant people endeavoring to live a simple
life have no idea how complicated it is for us to
ensure they remain simple to appreciate the simple
life whilst we publicly argue over the rights to
their elusive dreams without waking them.
Nobody knows the troubles I have seen keeping
them peacefully happy bordering poverty whilst
we must consistently seek out fair ways to divvy
up the true worth of their efforts.
He who is sincere hits what is right, and apprehends without the exercise of thought
emocracy esolve Frank Gallagher
Citizen
Citizen’s perspective
Long ago the government took our guns promising
to protect us while we endeavored to earn and stake
out our perception of heaven.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is but
words on paper written by people who traditionally
pen their way to our heaven leaving us believing our
Day will come
Well Mr. Day is here and he takes us softly into the
night
Some day our Knight will come.
Belief is the elusive dream that would be if not for
the Charlatan’s of State and Church whose habits
we feed
20
 Learning without thought is labor lost, learning without thought is perilous

Today centuries of knowledge is available at our finger tips, yet without

consistent attentiveness to genuine purpose attentive to reality it will persistently
be that which separates us from the Ideal.

He who is known as an early riser can sleep to noon

He who sleeps to noon will be left with naught, but a can of worms
Words are the weapons of politicians which they manipulate to manipulate the
people

How sad people with brains capable of unfathomable, most magnificent

accomplishments far beyond that which could possibly be imagined of the
capabilities and aspirations of God due their ignorance and persistence to it,
which attentiveness to tradition born of ignorance of the times serves to lengthen
the chain of time between Ideals being variables of the intelligence or ignorance
as you prefer, of the minds of times.

It has been 2500 years since Confucius walked the earth with his words of
wisdom and 2000 years since Jesus taught us the spirit and his conviction to it
and approximately 515 years since Christopher Columbus proved the world was
round.

We know the words of Confucius and Jesus to be true and perhaps we would
believe the world was flat today if it wasn’t for Mr. Columbus doing more than
just talking in circles lifting his ass off where upon it was sitting and put it where
it needed to be to prove the reality that was considered fiction by the most wisest
of the ignorant who lived in 1492.

I wish I had been there to witness the force of gravity that day as the face of
arrogant ignorant wisdom was realized, falling swiftly to assert their due place in
history.

History is the ignorance of times, not to be grasped firmly in retention but to

retain in progressive assent to the Ideal of present wisdom which are all but
variables in time where duration a variable of reluctance to let go the past.

21
The wisest person who sits on his ass will starve to death when the ignorant
become wise to them

He who keeps danger in mind will rest safely in his seat; he who keeps
ruin in mind will preserve his interest secure; he who sets the dangers
of disorder before himself will maintain a state of order

He offering words of wisdom in offset of irrefutable wisdom best be successful

lest he be offset, as a reliable source of wisdom.

Good day Mr. Day….I hope you have attentively put your mind to the facts and
absorbed well the issues I have presented you and quite frankly I hope stored in
the capacity your name suggests Mr. Stockwell.

Knowledge is that which we know to be true however when not used true to purpose defines
one’s true purpose

Reality is the truth impervious to perception however reality is precisely due to perception left
unattended.

Ignorance is simply absence of knowledge inherent to us all which persistently reminds,

keeping us simple in ignorant ways on refusal to acknowledge and attentively address it

Have you ever wished you had of said this rather than that and had perhaps a chance to do it
all over again.

I see no reason why it need be a wish and given the significance of the issues I have been
attempting to communicate it would be negligent of me not to make every effort to convey
that which I know to be true to the person I believe is responsible to deal with the issues and it
is to that endeavor I take you at your word until you prove different.

To make my intent clearly transparent and unambiguous I am writing you to inform you that
under normal circumstance I have chanced upon evidence that irrefutably proves the
governments of Canada and Ontario have conspired against the people creating a two tiered
system as a pathetically noticeable byproduct of their modus operandi which they themselves
have documented and I present for all to see on my web sites.

I do not yet have irrefutable proof as to your involvement other than by association and your
prominent position in the system which has been well documented by the personnel of the
system, oh and of course your response to my e-mail of July 19 2007 you affirm you received

22
and responded to 3 ½ months later on November 2 2007 incorrectly dated OCT 2 g 2007 a
copy of which immediately follows.

At this point you could very well be just one of their puppets intelligent in their ways but
ignorant as to their true purpose which everything in reality attests to.

One concentrating on the betterment of their career is apt to focus on that which will get them
there rather than focusing on the true purpose of playing an important role in the government
structure which is financed by the people who understand the necessity of all paying their fair
share towards the developing and maintenance of a moral society as defined by the supreme
law of Canada, the Constitution Act, 1982 which with the inclusion of the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms clearly states whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize
the supremacy of God and the rule of law

I shall do my best not to reiterate upon reiterations I have reiterated so many times before but
I will inform you once again where these reiterations are to be found along with all the
evidence which supports all that I state to be irrefutably true.

http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms

On this site is listed 9 other sites which combined hold the truth that need be gleaned to
respond to my most worthy concerns of Public Safety which you Hon. Stockwell Day are the
Minister of and remain tentatively Honourable in my unique perception..

Your words in your response to my e-mail to you July 19 2007 which said response was e-
mailed to me November 2 2007 but bares the date OCT 2 g 2007 which I immediately
responded back to on November 3 2007 indicates a person to be possessed of the knowledge
to deal with the issues, however when actually placed side by side with the letter you are
responding to provides many truths not relative to that which I seeked which is of course the
purpose of all my writings to get more than just words which are inane to the purpose as
would the world still be flat if not for Chris getting off his ass to prove the words true which
he spoke.

So, attentive to the fact humans err and do everything imaginable and unimaginable I address
the verbatim of your e-mail response to my July 19 2007 which you refer to.

It’s is in this way we can communicate and have a meeting of the minds, not only yours and
mine but whomever reads and follows up in the spirit of The Law ( Constitution document)
which all laws and those people granted authority under must be consistent with and
conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms which are consistent
with the aspirations attributed to God who the supreme law of Canada recognizes as supreme.

Given the most magnificent importance of the Canadian Constitution which governs everyone
and everything they do it is perquisite the government personnel who are financed to uphold
The Law and have sworn to do before God who is supreme be irreproachable to that endeavor

23
for it is the promise and guarantee of the Charter which ultimately protects and benefits each
and every individual of Canada in this sanctuary of the spirit of God.

Integrity, FFF to purpose is not an option to assure that which is humanly possible to protect
the people consistently consistent with the guarantee which is ultimately the responsibility of
each and every individual granted authority under the Constitution to administer and enforce it
consistent with the provisions found therein which must be interpreted in the spirit of The Law
under the supremacy of God.

The spirit of God is clear as direct from Jesus which is least likely to be mistaken by
humankind.

Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You

It is in this spirit I write to you which will be the test as to the spirit you respond
to me

Perhaps there will be some ambiguity presented from both sides along the way and given the
significance of the issues it is you Hon. Stockwell Day I address, to all your capacities of
government authority along with your capacities as an individual being one and the same with
every other individual guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms subject to and limited only to
compliance with The Law consistent with and conducive to the Charter.

It is you personally who I expect to respond to me given the most significant issues regarding
Public Safety and I do not consider a response from your janitor or anyone else of your staff to
be competent to your personal perception, however you are responsible for your assigns but it
is impossible for the meeting of our minds if you abstain.

As they say, first meetings have great influence on the perception of others and your first letter
leaves me wanting.

I remind you I have a prodigious amount of evidence that you must surely be aware of that
provides me the opportunity to discern when deviations from the purpose are being initiated
and it is your competence to assess the evidence I am addressing and testing for all to see.

I will presume that you are in concurrence with me in any issue you fail to address, and you
standby and hold to be true as within your knowledge to be true FFF.

My endeavor is to assure you are fully cognizant to and coherent to all the evidence I have
presented and where you may perceive to be some doubt as to that which I state to be true and
backed by fact it is your responsibility to address the issues of your perceptive doubt so that I
may direct you to the evidence which will remove any doubt as to your intention to befuddle
perceptions.

If you have any doubt at all as to that which I state to be irrefutably true, it is your
responsibility to table the evidence in support of your doubt and of course I will remain

24
consistent, true to purpose which must be yours in the prominent position of authority you
hold, granted under the auspices of The Law.

I have already responded to your response to me which is attached below on November 3 2007
and it is the intent of this letter to inform you that a response by you personally with great
effort to integrity FFF will be expected as required of a person in your prominent position in
the administering and enforcing of The Law of our country consistent with the authority
granted you consistent with the spirit of The Law and God who is recognized supreme

I ask you to explain to me, clearly how any of the verbiage in your response which you so
proudly signed to address the issues which I presented to you.

Every word you have had written and signed proves your consistency to the fiction of the
Attorney General described in the Do you part. doc I sent you on November 3 2007 which
contains a black bar like the one below which you may click on to refresh you memory.

http://books.google.com/books?

I remind you due to circumstances beyond your control and obviously everyone’s, any further
response in support of the Fiction perpetrated by the Office of the Department of Justice and
the Attorney General of Canada is superfluous for Fiction runs rampant and my files are
abundantly saturated with it, all irrelevant to the issues front and center dealing with the
criminal acts perpetrated firstly by my former tenant in a public building financed to
administer and enforce justice in accordance with The Law , the Constitution Act, 1982 and
the obstructions of justice perpetrated by the person’s identified in the 15 Lawyer Files which
can be found on my web site: Law Society of Lower Tier Canada
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society where you will see listed all the pertinent
evidence which Sgt. Steinebech of the RCMP confirmed he had available to him which they,
the RCMP had filed from my e-mails to Sgt. Michael Thomson.
Sgt. Steinebech also confirmed they have a copy of the Tribunal Hearing recording dated June
30 2005 which they have had for near two years now which was witnessed by my mother,
demonstrating no resemblance to that which you have written.

However what you have written reflects stunning resemblance to the fiction of the Attorney
General to be found by clicking on the aforesaid black bar, and the wisdom of Confucius 2500
years ago which bodes well with the acceptance of the Attorney General of Ontario to respect
the Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General .
to guard the unscrupulous ways of the tradition of his Office with no respect to the
Constitution which is ultimately his responsibility.

There were no words in this history but scrawled this way and that across every page were the
words BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY….finally I began to make out
what was written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single page: EAT
PEOPLE

25
Ultimately the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of Canada, Rob Nicholson who
you copied your response to me to is informed of the issues I have addressed to you and I
appreciate your efforts to this endeavor.

I make note that you refer to Rob as someone referred to the new Commissioner of the RCMP
as Bill drawing some attention as that which is most obvious that he and all upper echelon of
any government department, agency or whatever are receptive to the conspiracy and the
RCMP pension fund scandal also was linked to the DOJ.

Now he either acts responsibly with due regard to The Law which authorized his mandate or
he is in neglect of his responsibility leaving the Public Safety of the people unprotected as
demanded by the guarantees to the individual as provided in the Charter.

“As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the
RCMP and must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s
democratic traditions and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.”

Clearly Canada’s democratic traditions have been precluded by the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms where The Law recognizes the supremacy of God and the Law Society of
Upper Canada adamantly states their members do not give a damn about the individual’s
Charter Rights and went on to prove it in their correspondence dealing with a matter I brought
before them to address.

So you Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. have clearly acknowledged your
responsibility and accountability to the people in matters of the functions of the RCMP as
above and below

“As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the
RCMP and must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s
democratic traditions and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.”

This has been like pulling teeth as documented number (1) which heads the list of the
documents I presentd to the RCMP on October 18 2007 which Sgt. Steinebech affirmed the
RCMP already had on file.
Once again I refer you to that which I previously stated which can be found on my web site:
Law Society of Lower Tier Canada http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-
society where you will see listed all the pertinent evidence which Sgt. Steinebech of the
RCMP confirmed he had available to him which they, the RCMP had filed from my e-mails to
Sgt. Michael Thomson.

I have no doubt your belated apology in your delayed response of November 2 2007 3 ½
months after my e-mail of July 19 2007 you refer to in your response, copy attached following
my commentary was necessitated because you never intended to respond until the 41 page
document (1) To: Randy Craig Det Sergeant OPP Anti-Rackets Preamble Federal
correspondence Recap October 9 2007.doc Oct. 9, 2007 which is to be found on my web site
aforesaid immediately above.

26
Your admittance as to your responsibility and accountability is gratefully appreciated and all
that remains is for you to do your job in bringing the people to justice who have deprived me
of my guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms.

I remind you my documents are spread much further than you are aware of and it would be
wise to deal with the issues FFF in accordance with the Constitution with due regard to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights.

Surely things can be dealt with more reasonably than they are dealing with it in Pakistan.

Quite a challenge for you people of the government but we the people have been satiated with
the Reality you have bestowed upon us in your years of unscrupulous disrespect for the people
who have paid your way.

The Lord surely works in mysterious ways!!!

to those who refuse to understand Him.

Right?

Far from respect

Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher

PS

Amen

27
Minister of Public Safety
Ministre de a Sécurité publique
Ottawa, Canada K1A 0P8
OCT 2 g 2007

Mr. Frank Gallagher

frank.gaIIaghersympatico.ca

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

Thank you for your correspondence of July 19, 2007, regarding the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police (RCMP) pension fund as well as your concerns that rights under the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms are not being protected. I apologize for the delay in responding.
As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP
and must ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions
and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.

The Government is committed to a high standard of transparency and accountability and is

taking action to ensure government business is conducted in a responsible manner. In order to
deliver on its commitment to make Government more accountable, on April 11, 2006,
Canada’s new Government introduced the Federal Accountability Act, which received Royal
Assent on December 12, 2006. Through this Act, the Government of Canada has introduced
specific measures to help strengthen accountability and increase transparency and oversight in
Government operations. To clarify roles and responsibilities, the Federal Accountability Act
designates Deputy Ministers and Deputy Heads such as the Commissioner of the RCMP as
accounting officers who are accountable before the appropriate committee of Parliament to
answer questions related to their responsibilities.
Canada
-2-
The RCMP is an important national institution that plays a significant role in the safety and
security of Canadians; ensuring public trust and confidence is an important component of
achieving that role. Canada’s new Government has taken a number of recent steps in respect of
this important national institution.
On April 13, 2007, Mr. David Brown was appointed to lead an independent investigation into
allegations relating to the RCMP pension and insurance plans. The mandate for this

28
investigation gave Mr. Brown the flexibility to recommend whether a more formal inquiry was
necessary to address any outstanding questions. In his report, submitted to the Government on
June 15, 2007, Mr. Brown recommended that no formal inquiry was necessary. I have closely
reviewed Mr. Brown’s report and have accepted all of his recommendations.
On July 16, 2007, the Government announced the creation of a five-member Task Force on
Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP, to be chaired by Mr. David Brown. In
addition to the appointment of Mr. Brown as Chair, Linda Black, Richard Drouin, Norman
Inkster, and Larry Murray — each with varied expertise and experience — have been
appointed as members of the Task Force. The Task Force will make recommendations to
improve management and accountability within the RCMP, and will report back to the
Government by the end of 2007.
Furthermore, the appointment of William J.S. Elliott as the new Commissioner of the RCMP,
with a career that has been marked with distinction as well as expertise in the area of national
security, will provide the RCMP with the renewed leadership that it critically needs at this
time.
With respect to the criminal allegations under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 mentioned in
your letter, please note that criminal matters in Ontario fall within the purview of the
Honourable Michael Bryant, Attorney General of Ontario. You may therefore wish to raise
your concerns with his office, using the contact information provided below:
Ministry of the Attorney General
McMurtry-Scott Building
720 Bay Street, 11th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5G 2K1
Telephone: 416-326-2220

-3-
With respect to your concerns about the application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms, I have taken the liberty of forwarding a copy of your correspondence to my
colleague the Honourable Rob Nicholson, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada,
for his information and consideration. In addition, a copy of your correspondence has been
forwarded to Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner.
I regret that I cannot help in the way you had perhaps hoped, but wish you well in resolving
your concerns.
Yours sincerely,
c.c.: The Honourable Rob Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Ms. Mary Elizabeth Dawson, Q.C.
Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner
Stockwell Day, P.C., M.P. Minister of Public Safety

29
 This way up This way down

There were no dates in this history but scrawled this

Do not do to others what you would not way and that were the words BENEVOLENCE,
do to yourself RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY…finally I
Recompense injury with justice and began to make out what was written between the
recompense kindness with kindness lines; the whole volume was filled with a single
phrase:
The lord helps EAT PEOPLE
those who help
themselves

Heaven is to die for but there is a better way

The Constitution is the tool but in the hands of fools

30
 The deceitful Mind Is betrayed by the Body
Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet reality is precisely due to perception

A Constitution not enforced is as superfluous as a brain not used

http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms

The Proof of the Truth of the Government Corruption and

Conspiracy has been published on my webs site for all to see
including Commissioner William Elliot of the RCMP
I have filed a complaint with the “Commission For Public Complaints Against The
RCMP” for refusing to investigate Government corruption and conspiracy and
under the RCMP Act the Commissioner was required to acknowledge receipt of
the complaint by Christmas Day at the latest. The Commissioner was suspected to
be in on the conspiracy and his failure to comply with the Act has seriously
implicated him whereas a Public Inquiry is the only sane recourse to resolve the
issues. I have attached the pertinent evidence.
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society
December 27 2007

Commission for Public Complaints Against The Royal Canadian Mounted Police
7337 137 Street, Suite 102
Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1A4
Fax 604-501-4095
complaints@cpc-cpp-gc.ca

Attention Andree Leduc

Enquiries and Complaints Analyst
Frank Gallagher
Re: File No. PC-2007-2316
Manager, CST RET.
Re: File No. PC-2007-2317 GCCRF
Dear Andree Leduc

In response to your letter of December 20 2007 (copy attached) I thank you for admitting your
incompetence and lack of authority to deal with the issues of Government corruption and

31
conspiracy which are of a pressing concern to me and in my opinion should be a pressing
concern to you but obviously you are oblivious to that reality, understandable however
because I have a firm grasp of it.

You have stressed once again, that the purpose of the Commission is to provide the public
with an opportunity to make complaints concerning the conduct of the members of the RCMP
in the performance of their duties.

I understand you have neither the expertise nor the legal authority to permit you to become
involved in issues beyond the scope of this mandate.

It is important to note that I am alert to the narrow minds of government personnel and your
limited respect for the individuals of the moral majority not in the employ of the government
services and your persistence to insult our intelligence.

Let me put emphasis on the fact that I thank you as a citizen of Canada being an individual of
the public, for the opportunity to make a complaint concerning the conduct of the members of
the RCMP in the performance of their duties and in fact, as you are aware I have taken
advantage of your generosity, however I must also emphasize I am a taxpayer and I suggest
you keep that in mind should you care to continue in your endeavors.

Your admittance, and though appreciative of your integrity, is discerning that you are
incompetent but admittance is the first step to the cure.

Integrity is an exceptionally wonderful trait rare in the employ of the government and we can
not afford to lose you.

If it would give you any satisfaction I am incompetent too having no experience in dealing
with a government conspiracy when I began back on June 30 2005 even though I was aware of
persistent government corruption and conspiracy as we all are I never had substantial evidence
of it, but with confidence in my integrity and ability to think things out I set out to prove it and
now confident that I have a voluminous, and I thank you for that word because I have been
stuck with “ a preponderance” and “ a prodigious” which I thanked Karen Noakes #440 of the
York Regional Police” for, to describe the amount of irrefutable evidence I have supplied to a
voluminous number of government personnel who have refused to deal with the issues
published on my web site implicating them in the conspiracy.

At this moment I will accept the fact you are incompetent which you have admitted and
demonstrated and will offer you some suggestions with the endeavor to keep you out of
trouble and more useful to the Canadian people.

I have filed a complaint against two members of the RCMP for failing to investigate
government conspiracy as you are aware and have acknowledged in your letter of November 8
2007 (copy attached)

32
There is little needed to investigate the complaint for all that is required to do is ask the
officers involved and they will confirm it.

On my complaint I identified my mother as witnessing the refusal by Sergeant Roy Steinebach

on October 18 2007 so I doubt there will be any denying of that which I complained about.
Too simple so far right?

What the issue will be is whether or not the RCMP had the right to refuse to investigate the
evidence which they may if it is considered trivial, frivolous, or vexatious.

I believe the complaint itself is evident that it is not trivial, Right?

Is it frivolous or vexatious?

You don’t know right?

That is why I have been forwarding the evidence to you in advance so as to provide you the
opportunity to familiarize yourself with it and to get your mind thinking in appropriate manner
due the serious nature of the issues..

Your admittance of your incompetence and inexperience to that endeavor is discerning I

reiterate but never the less you will be called upon to make that very important decision.

At some point a public hearing will be in order and it would be prudent for the Chair to assign
a competent panel to the task and to that endeavor I heartedly suggest you study the evidence
published on my web site.

With due regard to your present ineptness I advise that attentiveness to the issues in the
document Law Society of Upper Canada Part 1 Part 2 will suffice to determine whether or not
the members of the RCMP who I have complained about are negligent in performance of their
duties.

I have presumed you people are not members of the legal profession and that is precisely what
is required of a jury in this instance not being biased, well perhaps that is not entirely correct,
however all that is required is a sane mind of integrity although one or the other is in question
due your letter to me but it will all become clear as we proceed.

You will find that Law Society document at the top of the page on my web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms

I remind you there will be no authority provided by the government conspirators to any
person, or government department or agency to take them out and likewise there will be no
cooperation from anyone under the influence of the conspiracy and in fact when they become
aware of this document will attempt to interfere with you in performance of your duty and I

33
suspect they will be very convincing as they continue to obstruct justice. Perhaps you have
already consulted with them.

I dare say they will be successful in their initiative but at that time if you were to take the news
to the media you will be assured a prominent spot in the hearts of the moral majority and you
will play a major role in the restructuring of the system consistent with and conducive to the
support of the Charter guarantee.

Adversely the consequences are unpredictable though will certainly be detrimental to some
significant degree of your concern.

Take a few moments if needed to reason that out and then keep it firmly and prominent in
mind.

Given the serious nature of the issues and our inexperience at dealing with such issues it is of
the utmost importance to get the evidence into experienced hands and most importantly
responsible hands which is an improbability due the fact the entire legal system is corrupt and
involved in the conspiracy, which at the moment I am giving you the benefit of the doubt due
to the lack of irrefutable evidence.

To that endeavor I expect full cooperation immediately consistent with your mandate, which
must be consistent with the Constitution.

I must advise that all correspondence with you will be published on my web site and failure to
respond to me in a timely manner will alter your status implicating you in the conspiracy.

The ultimate goal is obviously a Public Inquiry and I do expect full cooperation to that
initiative where it is the only viable option relative to the circumstances.

The Law Society document requires no professional experience to assess as to whether or not
it makes sense for members of the Law Society of Upper Canada to administer and enforce the
law consistent with and conducive to the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution Act, 1982
which includes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantees every
individual equality in protection and benefit in all matters before and under the law.

I suggest you make particular note of that.

Throughout my documents published on the web I have copied excerpts from the Charter but
for your convenience I provide you this.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no
force or effect.
I should mention that I am 65 years old and do not intend to spend the rest of my life tending
to a simple matter of bringing down the government conspiracy and I expect you to respect my
concerns.

34
I must say I was quite surprised, impressed and appreciative as to how quickly you processed
my original complaint to the RCMP.

Back to the matter on hand, the Law Society document, after reading you will be coherent to
the fact it is an improbability that members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who are
required to administer justice in accordance with the Constitution can do so when they are not
required to give a damn about the individuals guaranteed Charter rights which seriously
compromises the guarantee, wouldn’t you think?

Once you are cognizant to the facts study Lawyer Files # 1-3 found near the bottom of web
site http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society which should convince you of the
government conspiracy and the need for a Public Inquiry.

So with expedience in mind with foresight, benefit of evidence they will continue in their
reluctance to investigate and being in receipt of their inane verbiage I will forward you a
request for a review and you may at that time ask the RCMP to conduct a further investigation
of my complaint attentive to the issues regarding the Law Society of Upper Canada Part 1
Part 2 document and Lawyer Files # 1-3 regarding obstruction of justice in a criminal fraud
committed in front of a judicator in a public building financed to administer justice consistent
with the guaranteed Charter rights.

Their response to that will be most interesting and I presume there are provisions in the RCMP
Act for a timely response.

At this time, presuming they will not investigate the government conspiracy in its entirety, a
public hearing will be in order leading to a Public Inquiry which is imminent whether or not
you cooperate.

Your cooperation is inevitable sooner or later and I needn’t expand on the benefits of sooner.
Should you need any assistance you will find me most cooperative to reasonable request.

I thank you in advance and hope I have made my intentions and that which is required of you
absolutely clear.

Due to your present status of incompetence I will not burden you with further documents
presently over your heads.
We will eventually get around to them one way or another.

Frank Gallagher

PS
I am an individual of Canada and I expect equal service and benefit of your office and demand
you do not delete any further e-mails I send you which will be and are your responsibility
under your mandate.
I also advise that by deleting evidence I provide you by e-mail, which is my right is tampering
and destroying evidence pertinent to a criminal prosecution along with obstruction of justice.

35
I remind you I have done nothing but act responsibly and it is you who are wanting,
necessitating me to attend to the matter.

To that endeavor I will expect an immediate acknowledgement of receipt as a reply

e-mail with contents of my request attached.

Should that fail I will apprise you of the evidence by other means available to me.

On receipt I will expect acknowledgement by e-mail with your assurance you will cooperate in
a manner consistent with and conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and in
particular mine in efficient and effective manner with due regard to the rights of the tax
payers.

These are most serious matters regarding the safety and well being of every individual in
Canada and must be dealt with due regard..

My web site and the public await your response which is of pressing concern to me and you if
you are coherent and susceptible to reason.

We will see.

It is absolutely ridiculous to use Canada Post which serves only to delay.

I am publishing everything on the web so there is no concern about privacy and confidentiality
and it would be an initiative showing your ability to think things out logically rather than stick
to inane policy due the circumstance where policy will not allow you to take affirmative action
against government corruption, conspiracy and Organized Crime as you will know when you
study the evidence.

I reiterate that you must study it to determine if it is trivia, frivolous or vexatious which it is
obviously not for the evidence is signed by government personnel and staff of the Law Society
of Upper Canada.

It’s all real, and yes you are involved with exposing it or attempting to cover it up because it
most definitely will get to a PUBLIC INQUIRY and so will you one way or another.

The consequences are your choice.

36
How would one
know when it was
received by the
Commissioner? I’ll
presume
November 16 2007
as per page 8

37
 November 16 2007
How would one know a Friday so 3 days to
when it was actually deliver not counting
received? Saturday and
Did it sit on someone’s Sunday.
desk for a while or is it
acknowledged as it
comes in?

Obviously not the Commissioner nor is

the letter head the Commissioner’s.

I will tentatively presume this to be

standard procedure making the report
due 30 days from November 16 2007
being December 16 2007 allowing 5
days mail delivery December 21 2007

38
 Received by mail
Dec.23 2007

December 31 2007 Resent by e-mail

Andree Leduc
Complaints Against RCMP
Enquiries and Complaints Analyst

Please see attachment “Commission RCMP

Complaints Dec. 27 2007” and immediate response
required
January 2 2008 Out with the old….In with the new.

Andree
Having not received acknowledgement of receipt of e-mail I am now forced to send by fax at
undue cost to me due your failure to cooperate in a manner conducive to the well being of
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which are not being supported by government personnel,
severely compromising their safety and in direct defiance of the law and indifference to the
people who finance your services

Immediate response required …….Get up to speed……..Formal complaint coming soon

Frank Gallagher
39
40
 The Stockwell Day letter pages 27 and 28
demonstrates the divertive manner the government
conspirators adopt when pressure is on them further
demonstrtd by the Federal Accountability Act,2006.
A Public Inquiry into the RCMP Pension Fund scandal
which revealed the improprieties of the upper command
linked to the DOJ was diverted to a Task Force which
Stockwell confirmed was the best way to go which
served to cover up the conspiracy. The task Force has
provided their report to the RCMP which I have not
seen
That is evidence which should show no mention of a
diligent investigation into the DOJ link to the RCMP
Pension Fund and no punishment dealt out to
the upper command implicated in the conspiracy
irrefutably making my point justice is an improbability
under the present administration.where their endeavor is
to stick together to ransack the people and when they are
caught they simply orchestrate their way out of it. A
PUBLIC INQUIRYwas warranted then and a PUBLIC
INQUIRY is warranted now where I reiterate the Task
Force report is evidence of their persistence to
conspiracy and deceit.

The evidence is voluminous an investigation is

necessary and the RCMP Commissioner has
implicated himself in the conspiracy demonstrated
by his refusal to cooperate and comply with RCMP
ACT being 18 approximately 18 days overdue of
providing a status report within 30 days of
acknowledging receipt of the complaint.

The facts are clear and simple as is the necessity of

a Public Inquiry with the ultimate objective to clean
up the government conspiracy and organized crime
intent on ransacking the moral majority to the
benefit of the members of the legal profession to the
astronomical detriment of the moral majority.
The legal system must be radically restructured to
ensure consistency with the Constitution conducive
to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

I hereby request a review of the evidence with the intent to expedite to a Public Inquiry with due regard to
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no
force or effect. Your duty as per your mandate is abundantly clear as is the evidence and due the
circumstances a PUBLIC Inquiry is the only option. Should the conspirators attempt to interfere as they are
wont to do you must get the information to the people via the media Frank Gallagher
41
 The public hearing as is within your
mandate need not be lengthy if the
public hearing is well publicized
which you must be attentive to that
endeavor and it is now time for the
media to fulfill their responsibility to
the people.

Any attempt to delay the public

hearing or elongate it will be seen as
being orchestrated by the conspirators
and another venture into superfluity.

The circumstance does not warrant heading

to this eventuality where a PUBLIC
INQUIRY is demanded and
recommendations to the RCMP and Public
Safety is not an option where the Minister of
Public Safety, the RCMP Commissioner the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General are
guilty of conspiracy if not treason and must
stand trial before the people.

Hardly would they heed a recommendation

to severely punishment themselves.

I reiterate a PUBLIC INQUIRY is the only valid

and reasonable approach due the circumstance
and very serious nature of the issues.

Frank Gallagher
See page 42 which provides for an immediate
public hearing providing a direct route to the
inevitable PUBLIC INQUIRY
42
This document “ RCMP COMPLAINT January 4 2008 will be found on web site

http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms

Obviously the people need to be informed in

the public interest and a loud public
hearing is the quickest way to a PUBLIC
INQUIRY and then some trials and due
punishment in deterrence initiatives with a
restructured system and a completely
independent body of the people for the people
with authority to bring all issues before the
people which the media are more than morally
responsible to do.
They must not be allowed to be harassed by the
government in anyway.

43