You are on page 1of 39

February 10 2007

Law Society of Upper Canada


Allison J Cheron
Barrister and Solicitor
Manager
Complaints Services
Comail@lsuc.on.ca
My mistake. I had already received it
Decmber 14 2006 (See page 31)
Re: File 06-3422

Dear Ms. Cheron

I am still waiting for your response to my December 1 2006 e-mail to you.

As I have stated in previous writings commencing June 23 2006 I have been illegally
terminated from a contract by Gregory M. Mulligan Lawyer for Dalgleish of Bolsover.

Gregory M. Mulligan acting for Dalgleish terminated my contract by letter dated June 16 2006
stating I was to commence work June 5 2006 and to be completed by June 15 2006 and that at
that time I was barely started. Then he goes on to state many other fabrications by his client.

I see no reason why the lawyer shouldn’t trust his client about why he wants to terminate after
all he must have good reason to go to the bother of seeing a lawyer.
Indeed he did, which was for immoral financial benefit to himself which I will have no problem
proving.
Every word the man stated was a lie including the dates on the contract. That alone is enough
evidence to prove he is a fabricator but witnesses will attest to the rest.

That however is not the gist of my complaint to the Law Society as I have articulated to you on
several occasions.

Mr. Mulligan surely must be aware of the seriousness of terminating a contract and it would be
incumbent on him to at least verify the starting and completion date before he cites in the letter
to me.

Having failed to do that he surely should have after I queried him in the e-mail I sent June 23
2006.

It is obviously of the utmost importance to the situation because there was no starting date or
completion date on the contract.

The fact is, since he was a cousin of an acquaintance of mine I gave him a low price and stated
in the contract that I would be completed when Ms. Silverthorn his aunt who owns the property
states that the work is completed to her satisfaction.

I have written you on several occasions regarding this matter.

1
I am just an ordinary person trying to survive in this world, as are we all, but by Mr. Mulligan’s
neglect to view the contract, which is his authority to act upon, I have been wronged both
morally and financially.

Both Mr. Mulligan and your office have been apprised of this since June 23 2006 and I reiterate
that I have repeatedly stated this in subsequent writings.
It is just too important of a fact not to have looked into and yet your office has refused to state
whether you did or not.

It is beyond reasonable comprehension that people in your profession would not do so as any
normal person would whether they are a barber, painter, carpenter, salesmen, waitress or
whatever.

Of course it would be irrelevant if they did because they would take such a matter to a lawyer
because that is how it’s done and they would be obliged to trust them because we don’t have
any choice.

Unfortunately the major problem with the law is that those who have careers in other fields of
endeavor presume it’s all about moral conscience and presume those practicing it are moral.
That’s the rub.

The legal system is set up by lawyers for lawyers to the great detriment of society.

I believe I have mentioned this in previous writings to you as I have in the BLACK BOOK.

You people are too intelligent not to be coherent to this and of course intelligent enough to
deny it.

Unfortunately you are not intelligent enough to cover it up in your writings but it doesn’t matter
does it because you are all in it together and the individual who has certain God given rights
declared by the Constitution Act, 1982 (Document) has them taken away by the Constitution
(Establishment).

What can the individual do but shrug their shoulders and try to live with it and look forward to
Heaven after death..
You people are a blight on society.

You turn the simplest situations into federal cases all for the love of money and what it can
buy.
By your greed you turn a world into hell rather than the Heaven referred to in the Lord’s
Prayer.

We all love money you know because most of us are trying to survive in this hell you create
completely adverse to the Constitution ACT which makes you all guilty of treason.
Most of us try to earn it honestly and we were of the opinion that the legal system was put in
place to assert that ideology.

We have every logical reason to believe that.

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and
the rule of law:
2
Fact trumps Belief

It is the most outrageous pathetic betrayal perpetrated upon society however ingenious but then
any rogue like Sadam Hosein could have assembled such a system and called it Democracy and
the population would be forced to accept it.
Sounds better when the document states we are free but in reality enslaved to work for the
establishment with a little left over after taxes to cloth and feed ourselves and put a roof over
heads.

Obviously I am wasting my time corresponding with you people because by your actions you
continuously evidence that which I state and I am satiated with the proof.

The inherent problem is to find someone in the legal system who actually cares about the
people.
Heaven knows I have tried but all I got was an abundance of proof that the establishment is
corrupt.

If you think I am a victim of refutable belief please trump me now.

In the meantime time I will attempt to present the facts to the people until they present their
own.

The people will find the Power and the Glory of the spirit of God when they answer their
prayers.

3
4
5
6
So, could I see it please?

I would hope that the Law Society would agree with me and ask you to
send them a copy as well.

Perhaps they may even ask you to apologize to me and request that you
make things right.

Hell, they may request that you charge Robert Dalgleish with fraud or
something under the criminal code subsection something or other.

We will see.

Frank Gallagher

cc: The Law Society of Upper Canada


comail@lsuc.on.ca

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
August 22 2006

To: The Law Society of Upper Canada


Aldano-Maria Bigos
Complaints Services Representative
Client Service Centre
Comail@lsuc.on.ca
Fax 416-947-5263

From: Frank Gallagher


34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick, On.
L4P 2P8
Fax 905-476-8959
Franklyone@hotmail.com

Dear Ms. Aldano-Maria Bigos

Re: Your File No. 06-3422

I am responding to your letter dated August 15 2006 (copy attached) which is your response to
my query in a letter to Gregory M. Mulligan dated and e-mailed June 23 2006 (copied to you)
(copy attached)

I want it made clearly noted that I am disappointed with your response and further noted that it
is nothing less than I expected.

You see, I am just about 64 years old now and have learned that family will
stick together and in this case, who the hell does this guy think he is, just some common folk
with the nerve to question one of our families character.

He doesn’t have the sense to realize that he is talking about one of Canada’s best who are
licensed to do what ever is necessary to rob their client’s enemies at will under the guise of
protecting their client’s interests.

You do not mention that they are required to do so in such a manner as can be deemed
acceptable by law and so I assume that justice is not a factor when it comes to a commoner
being ransacked by a lawyer who is just doing his best for his client’s interests.

Hard to swallow at first but over the years one becomes familiar with the connivances of
lawyers and it behooves me the respect they retain while for every crook that hits the courts
there is at least one crook defending him.

So just to keep focused at this time, two months ago I received an e-mail on June 23 2006 from
Gregory M. Mulligan dated June 16 2006 in which he runs off at the mouth in his client’s best
interest which is okay with you people down there at the Law Society of Upper Canada.

25
No concern for the adversary of the client and just how this action of ordering me off the
Dalgleish/Silverthorn may affect me, emotionally and financially.

In fact the client’s foe is assumed guilty, immediately, even when the prima fascia evidence of
innocence is staring them in the face.

The prima fascia evidence which I refer to is the contract which Gregory M. Mulligan states
exists with a starting date of June 5 2006 and a completion date of June 15 2006. Then he
spews a pile more crap in reference to this contract and I say wait a minute. What contract?
Will you please send me a copy of this contract?
I have requested a copy over and over and over again, because to us simple folk if a person is
going to act on the grounds of the terms of a contract not being met one would have such a
contract in hand? Wouldn’t they?
Or is a lawyer allowed to just make up things as they pop into his head?

Personally I think not and I suggested that, by asking the simple question “by what authority
does he order me off the premises of Dalgleish/Silverthorn?

Gregory Mulligan purports that there is a contract with a completion date of June 15 2006 and I
happen to know for fact that there is no such contract.

Now I expect to hear from you that this is just a matter of a lawyer’s word against mine who is
just a commoner anyway, but that matter will have to be taken up in court.
Why not, it gives two of your people work and me an innocent victim unwarranted headaches
and most likely I will decline to pursue the matter to the best interest of Mr. Gregory
Mulligan’s client.

Now I repeat again, by what authority did he act upon when he terminated a contract and let me
repeat again, could I have a copy of that contract.

It has been mentioned over and over again and I must assume that you have now seen the
contract because you have taken near two months to ….Well let me cite the Law Society of
Upper Canada letter dated June 26 2006.

“While we realize the importance of a quick response, we also need to take the time to
ensure that your letter is given the attention it deserves. Normally we will contact you or
respond to you in approximately 30 days, depending on the type of inquiry”

I presume that 2 months should have afforded you the opportunity to acquire
a copy of the contract from Gregory M. Mulligan and set it along side the letter which Gregory
M. Mulligan sent me dated June 16 2006 to determine if there is any credence or validity to his
claim and if not the man is a shyster.

Now don’t tell me that is a matter for the courts to decide because I have lost out on the balance
of which is owed by the contract and you hold the damn evidence in your hands that the very
document he used as the authority to state that I was in breach of contract due to failure to
complete by June 15 2006 in fact states no completion date at all.

26
You did a lot of dancing around to avoid the only pertinent fact and by your refusal to even
comment on the whereabouts of the contract involve you and the Law Society of Upper Canada
in on the conspiracy to wreak havoc upon an innocent person as the documents clearly prove.

You did so unconscientiously and willfully obstructed justice..

I would advise you to seek counsel and I highly suggest that you do not retain the services of
Gregory M. Mulligan because even if it is acceptable by the Law Society for him to act in such
a manner for the sake of his clients interest I should advise that by not looking at the said
contract to see that there was no completion date he has left his client wide open for charges of
theft and conspiracy to commit theft.

Of course his clients’ best interests will now have to play less than second fiddle as Mr.
Gregory Mulligan struts his stuff to weasel his way out of this one.
This man Robert Dalgleish is everything I stated he was in my response letter to Mr.
Mulligan’s June 16 th and even more.

Robert Dalgleish had family coming out to visit from out west who were going to do projects
around the house for aunt Charlotte and one of the projects was to straighten up a stone and
mortar retaining wall which I ended up doing at great financial loss to me but it saved them
countless hours if they were to do the project by hand shovel.

I suggest that it was no coincident that I was ordered off the property immediately after I had
delivered and paid for the majority of the materials to complete the project and it is no
coincident that my materials were used to finish off the project. If one were to ask, I am sure
that the answer would be that family finished off the project at great expense to me and great
savings to Dalgleish/Silverthorn.

There is much more to it than just the financial disaster to me for it involves the loss of my
business which was a direct result of the willful defamation of my character and business name.

I ask you one more time, just for the record. Will you please send me a copy of the contract
which Gregory M. Mulligan purports to have.

I suspect that you are bound not to hand out documentation submitted by the lawyer but will
you comment as to whether or not you received a copy of the contract from Mr. Mulligan and if
so when?

I also highly recommend that you forward this to your superiors and request that they respond
to me ASAP as I now intend to bring this matter forward.

In regards to you sending a copy of your response dated August 15 2006 to Mr. Gregory M.
Mulligan I say certainly. He is entitled to know your decision even though I doubt it should be
any surprise.

I am just a plain simple commoner who has nothing to hide and unaware of all the illegal,
immoral, shenanigans bestowed upon those in the legal profession and I suppose that you may
even suggest that the laws offer me the same opportunity to skip and duck moral, illegal
conduct and conspiracy what ever if I could afford a good lawyer who doesn’t mind being bad.

27
You need not concern yourself that it took you near two months to arrive at your decision
because this is not out of the norm for a commoner to be put on hold while attempting to rip off
a little justice from the system.

I would like to note that it took a way less than a day to respond to your response and I suggest
that simple innocence is easier to put to paper than conspired tangled webs and in this case not
so tangled.

Frank Gallagher

August 23, 2006

VIA E-MAIL ONLY

Frank Gallagher
franklyone@hotmail.com

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

Re: Our File No. 06-3422

I acknowledge receipt of your e-mail regarding Gregory M. Mulligan, which


we received on August 14, 2006. Please be advised that we are in the
process of reviewing your correspondence.

Yours truly, Should read August 22 2006

Aldona-Maria Bigos
Complaints Services Representative
Client Service Centre

28
October 27 2006

To: Aldona-Maria Bigos


Law Society of Upper Canada
Comail@lsuc.on.ca

From: Frank Gallagher


34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick, On
L4P 2P8
franklyone@hotmail.com

Re: Your File No. 06-3422

Dear Aldona-Maria Bigos

I am writing in reference to your letter of August 23 2006


acknowledging receipt of my letter dated August 22 2006 which
you state you received August 14 2006.

I am wondering if you are any where near completion of


reviewing my concerns of my August 22 2006 letter to you
regarding your response dated August 15 2006 to my letter to
Mr. Gregory Mulligan of Bournes,Jenkins & Mulligan, Barristers,
Solicitors & Notarie Public dated June 23 2006 which I copied
to the Law Society of Upper Canada for your review of his
conduct.

I had expressed my displeasure with your response and requested:

I ask you one more time, just for the record. Will you please send me a copy of
the contract which Gregory M. Mulligan purports to have.

I suspect that you are bound not to hand out documentation submitted by the lawyer but will
you comment as to whether or not you received a copy of the contract from Mr. Mulligan and if
so when?

I also highly recommend that you forward this to your superiors and request that they respond
to me ASAP as I now intend to bring this matter forward.

I would think that you have had sufficient time now, to review,
(over 2 months to obtain a copy of the contract from Gregory M.
Mulligan, actually 4 months, because you should have had a copy
in order to respond to my original complaint)and set it down on
a desk in front of you along side his letter sent to me to
terminate my contract for the purpose of confirming your
original decision that it is quite all right for a lawyer to
run off at the mouth with a pile of Bull Shit according to your
“ Rules of Professional Conduct” in the performance of his duty
as you stated in your response dated August 15 2006 to my
original complaint dated June 23 2006.
29
You would be amazed what goes on in the minds of us simple people.
How simple we think things are in the world we live in.

Not until someone deprives us do we begin to understand our naivety and you won’t believe
that even though I was confident that I had addressed my concerns to an authority which should
be competent to deal with them I am so simple that I do not comprehend your response even
though it was well articulated.

I would have thought that all you had to do was look at the contract and see if Mr. Mulligan
had any authority to terminate it with lies.

It just seems to me if he is going to cite a contract he should have a look at it.


It is obvious that he didn’t look at it or he wouldn’t have stated what he did.

Damn, there I go again displaying my ignorance for all to see.

I hope when you are through laughing at me you will try to explain one more time why it is
okay for people in your profession to do what Mr. Mulligan has done to me.

Perhaps if you don’t type so fast and explain it in the simplest form I may better understand.

Meanwhile I am so thankful that you people are there to look after us.

Please apologize to Mr. Mulligan for me being so upset and concerned only about myself and
the detrimental affect his actions had on my livelihood.

I am so ashamed of myself that while I was accusing him of not giving a damn about me I
wasn’t giving a damn about him and his livlihood.

It goes a way deeper than just this incident for I have been writing a lot lately about people’s
Charter Rights, equality and fairness and stuff like that while all along it has been me who has
been unfair.

I have a whole lot of apologizing to do but to do it proper I want to make sure I have a thorough
handle on the facts, as best as I am capable of understanding, so that I may do it justice.

Please understand the urgency for your response, (but still type slow).

Thank you,

Frank Gallagher

30
31
32
December 19 2006

Dear Allison J. Cheron

I thank you for your response dated December 14 2006 to my e-mail dated August 22 2006 and my e-
mail of October 27 2006 in which I questioned why your response to my e-mail of August 22 2006 was
taking so long.

4 months since I requested a response and 1 ½ months since I asked why it was taking so long.
Could you please tell me why it took so long?

Once again I must state my disappointment with the Law Society response.

You write” the Law Society does not require a lawyer to investigate the facts provided by a client before
writing such a letter for the client.”
You also write “the Law Society does not review contracts and determine if they have been legally
terminated.”
4 months for that.

“Shoot first and ask questions later” was a kid’s joke and I laughed when I heard it but it’s not so
funny when it actually happens to you.

This is a for real, life going on out here and one of your members shot the horse out from under my ass.
What the hell have facts got to do with it you imply?

I can’t make a move without considering the facts and neither can you but you have no regard for my
welfare or my Charter Rights when working. Would you kick me if I was lying on the sidewalk?

Please have a look at Rule 1 in your book of standards and try a little harder and quicker to respond
PLEASE.
(103) Interpretation
(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules
in the spirit
as well as in the letter.

Thank you,
Frank Gallagher

33
Pages 144-146 from the
See page 48 Who knew? BLACK BOOK

Soon, maybe or perhaps in a long while I will have a response from the Law Society of Upper
Canada concerning an entirely different matter aside from Don and the ORHT which will
further evidence that which I have stated in these writings.
The correspondence I have in my immediate possession already documents that which I state
but I just feel it prudent to wait at this time.

There is no hurry now for my benefit.

It took them 2 months to make a decision that could have been made in two days.

A timely proper decision could have saved me a lot of grief.

Although their letter acknowledging receipt of my complaint was sympathetic to my concerns


and they stated that they were coherent to the importance of an early resolve they took 2
months to come to a conclusion that they couldn’t help me. What a surprise eh?

This is on record.

When I present the correspondence you will see that the Law Society of Upper Canada has
provided the proof of their major role in the conspiracy to rob the people blind while they sleep
under the enchanting spell placed upon them by the Constitution Act, 1982.

Such, an ingenious plot, right there, in our faces where we couldn’t see it.

I mean, we all knew something isn’t right but how do you put your finger on it?

I mean everything must be legitimate right?


With all the law enforcement offices out there throughout Canada looking after us and all the
great wording in the Charter , Schedule B, Part 1 of the Constitution Act ,1982.

Surely if there were something wrong with the system one of our brilliant investigative forces
would have got to the bottom of this or maybe they are all at the bottom of this.

I personally do not think our Investigations and Enforcement officers have the ability nor the
desire to look out for our rights as guaranteed by the Constitution.

Correction, I know so.

The evidence is all there in the previous pages but unfortunately the same evidence proves that
they can’t investigate to a proper conclusion if all the investigation was done for them and the
only and proper conclusion was handed them.

Such a sad, sad how do ya do.

34
Anyway, as usual, I will lay the evidence on the table and I will give them all another chance to
see if they can make any sense of their ability to reason to the “proof beyond a reasonable
doubt….plateau.”

I must reiterate that these writings are not only backed by evidence but in the majority the
evidence is the writings themselves.

Supporting evidence is everywhere.


Everyone of you has a story or more to tell, and for every story there exists the evidence in
court room files.

The evidence is in the actions of those mandated to provide a modus operandi to guarantee our
rights and the evidence is there as to who benefited from their efforts.

If it wasn’t the people then they must be held suspect as to their role in this conspiracy.

The proof is in the pudding as they say and now all that need be done is to identify the chefs
which is a matter of record

Its all there in Schedule A of the Constitution Act, 1982.

Right there, where they identify the chairs and their authorities.

Find the chair and see who sits in it and by all means play no music during this part of the
investigation.

Well, I have reconsidered my decision to wait for the Law Society of Upper Canada response
for I do not believe it is in the best interest of the people and it surely would not serve them if I
were to allow time for my records and me to disappear.

So here we go. It is 1:30 AM Sunday morning and while they sleep I will fill e-mail boxes with
fact and await the truths that emerge.

Each will have one of them thar opportunity knocks but once kinda thing going for them and it
is their immediate action which they will be judged as so much is based upon first impression.

That is a matter of record

35
Although it is not for me to say, I will express my opinion that the urgency is to make things as
intended by the Constitution Act, 1982 for the immediate benefit of all the people of society.

There is no time to waste filling our courts with those who would have it their way instead of
ours.

If the people of Canada are ever to reap the intended provisions of the Constitution, the
Constitution must be known and deemed to be completely and absolutely in tact. In no way has
the foundation been cracked. It is as solid today as ever it was.

The enactment of the Constitution was the transition from hope to promise of that which the
people wanted and in this there can be no doubt.

In centuries to come will be debates as to the intentions of those who sat to write and those who
presided to administer the writes.

It matters naught whether the words were written to assure the people that the powers that be
had the best interests of the people at heart or if the powers that be wrote them for the intention
of deception.

It matters only that the words are that which the people wanted to hear and by declaration
became the supreme law of Canada.

By so doing the powers that be became the powers that were and the people became the powers
that be.

The irony is that if deception was their intent, mission accomplished, they have been deceived
because the ball was transferred to our court.
It always has been since the enactment we were just slow to get on it.

Now I will submit the Law Society of Upper Canada correspondence and see where the ball
bounces.

See the Bolsover Contract

36
The Bolsover Contract Excerpt from the BLACK BOOK page 147

June 16 2006 Gregory M. Mulligan of Bourne, Jenkins & Mulligan ordered me off the property
of a client of mine and terminated a contract on false allegations. He stated the contract was for
me to commence work on June 5 2006 and was to be completed on June 15 2006 and then goes
on to state other crap which I would imagine came from his client Robert Dalgleish.

I wrote Mr. Mulligan asking by what authority does he do so and I question what rights he has
to fire off such a letter full of crap. I asked him to provide me with a copy of the contract he
refers to but he declined to send me one.

I forwarded a copy of my letter to him to the Law Society of Upper Canada making known my
contempt.
The Law Society of Upper Canada took 2 months to return as ridiculous a response as the claim
Gregory Mulligan made to terminate my contract and yet neither will forward me or
acknowledge that they have such a contract. That could very well be because there is no such
contract.

I do have a contract with Robert Dalgleish’s aunt however and there is neither a starting date
nor a completion date. In fact it clearly states that I am to receive full payment on completion
of the work listed on the contract when Charlotte Silverthorn decided that the work was done to
her satisfaction.

This is a clear and simple case proving the injustices served upon the Canadian people by those
in the legal profession.
I gave the Law Society of Upper Canada the opportunity to show discern for Mr. Mulligan’s
unfounded attack on my livelihood and their response shows that they see nothing wrong with
his actions.

This goes a long way to proving that the ordinary person in Canada can not possibly expect to
receive the justice promised by the Constitution Act, 1982 because those people who are
authorized by the system to act on the people’s behalf do not comprehend the meaning of the
word justice nor do they care. They obviously have no fear of repercussions from their actions
and why should they? Where would the repercussions come from? Their brothers or sisters?
Apparently not. Perhaps a little chiding on the side with a nudge and a wink.

Mr. Mulligan has acted in reckless abandonment of the privileges bestowed upon him to serve
in the legal profession which surely is governed by the laws of the arena which he is licensed to
practice in. His blatant disregard for my rights is a blatant disregard for the people’s rights of
Canada and the Law Society condoning his actions places them as guilty as he and by so doing
have implicated them in a conspiracy to ravage the populace of Canada under the guise of
providing services for the procurement of justice under the Constitution when it is obvious by
Mr. Mulligan’s actions that justice was the furthest thing in his mind.

The LS has not mentioned justice so am I to assume that is not their basic objective? Do ya
think?
In matters of Mr. Mulligan looking after his client’s best interests he has not demonstrated that
to me.

Now, I am no lawyer, but I have spent 40 years in the legal survey sector and I never once
stated or acted without an authority to back my decision. Whether it be the positioning of a
37
property line as defined under the Surveys Act or replacing a lost corner stake as per the call of
a deed without considering the rights and authorities of documentation supporting the abutting
properties and the rights of the other people who would be affected by my actions..

Mr. Mulligan has not considered my rights and in so doing has failed to look after his client’s
interests and by so doing has left his client liable to charges for damages to me. The only bright
spot is that Mr. Mulligan has left himself open for damages although the justice I have
witnessed leaves me skeptical.

I do not know if his actions reveal his incompetence or his faith in his and other’s of his
profession to operate outside the law unchecked. No hint of conscience nor moral conviction
for sure.

I am thinking that it is time that we found out.

The LS also state that Mr. Mulligan receives instructions and information from his client and
has an obligation to vigorously advance and defend his interests on this basis. I reiterate that
Mr. Mulligan has not considered my rights and in so doing has failed to look after his client’s
interests and by so doing has left his client liable to charges for damages to me.

As is the case when people are victimized the likelihood of receiving the justice guaranteed by
the Constitution is near impossible because those administering justice are incapable of
providing proof that their modus operandi is able to guaranty the guaranty of the Charter.

This I can prove and I have provided the evidence in the preceding 147 pages and I have at
least as many more pages to follow and many more if necessary.

The LS also mention that if I am unrepresented I may contact a referral service which they
provide.
I wonder how long the person would remain on the referral list if they confronted the LS with
the charges I state and I wonder to what extent of enthusiasm that person might exert against
the LS.
I am a little leary that person may be just a wee bit reluctant.

The law profession’s obstruction to justice is blatantly obvious and I have made reference to
just a few which were readily apparent as I glanced at their response to my inquiry dated
August 15 2006 and I can hardly wait to hear from them as they respond to my letter dated
August 22 2006 in which I expressed my disappointed with their response.

Such aggravation to the people of Canada these people inflict on society and for what is
painfully obvious.
Look in their driveways and look at their houses while you are there.

Look at their lifestyles and the smiles on their faces and look at the faces of the victims they
have left in their wake. Even their client’s do not fair well.

We can not have justice until those practicing law finally learn it.
How long must a lawyer practice before he can be considered competent and who would there
be to judge.

38
Damn, I just wet my pants but at least I had a good laugh for the moment, but as always when it
comes to law it was at my expense.

I’ll be right back as soon as I can find a dry pair.

Please see page 149-152 for my response to the Law Society response
page 153 for Mr. Gregory Mulligan’s termination of my contract
pages 154 & 155 for my response to Mr. Gregory Mulligan’s termination of my
contract
pages 156-158 for the Law Society of Upper Canada response to my June 23 2006
complaint

I rest for now while I set out to distribute some seeds for the betterment of the people of
Canada.

franklyone@hotmail.com alias franklyone justice Seed

39

You might also like