Julia Munro, MPP

York North

August 21, 2007

Dear Ms Munro

I am writing in response to your response of July 31 2007 to my e-mail communication of July 23

2007 which was just one of a preponderance of e-mail communications I have sent you describing
the inappropriate actions of the establishment.

I do not apologize for my tardiness to respond to your response for I am confident that you were not
requiring a response and perhaps you even knelt in prayer that you had heard the last from me.

I do wonder what caused you to respond to this particular letter and not the many others preceding
them. I will review that letter as I am wont to do for anything significant that may help in my
unrelenting endeavor to trigger a domino like action sooner than later which will befall upon the
conspirators of the counterfeit democracy.

The stage is set and they have persistently done it to themselves for they have taken far too many
strides away from the law and have trusted too many to be loyal to their cause and trusted the
people would remain ignorant to their ingenious plot but over the years with the significant
improvement in communications the plot thickens to a gel which finds them stuck fast with their
hands in the kitty and I do not make reference to a cat although that would have been the best way
to get attention but not an option where only truth will suffice..

The evidence I have provided you irrefutably proves the whole legal system acts consistently to
deceive the people and in fact the system is successful due the loyalty of the establishment
personnel to the conspiracy.

As an MPP, an elected representative of the people it is inappropriate of you not to interfere in the
workings of provincial adjudicative agencies, the courts or any other body which is detrimental to
the well being of your constituents as well as all constituents in Ontario.

If you have perused the evidence and choose to remain ignorant you are no different than the rest of
the personnel of the establishment and are as much a part of the conspiracy and corruption as are the
rest as your letter clearly indicates.

What is appropriate to the conspiracy is your loyalty to it which of course is inappropriate to the
people and the Charter itself which guarantees the individual rights and freedoms.

I reiterate that I have presented you a comprehensive package of evidence which irrefutably proves
the whole legal system is corrupt and in fact is a deliberate conspiracy against the people.

Perchance you are not alert to the fact that you play a major role in this conspiracy as do the other
MPP’s so I ask you to have another look at my writings as they would be viewed from the people’s
stand point if they were provided the opportunity to access them.

The fact that you persistently suggest I seek legal advice proves you are not coherent to the facts of
my writings or are not sympathetic to the needs and well being of the people or both.
1
As you surely are aware the laws of Ontario must be consistent with the Constitution, the supreme
law of Canada and all laws are significantly influenced by lawyers who have infiltrated the
establishment which would be presumed to be natural and reasonable considering they are the only
profession authorized to practice law.

The problem is they are a personal interest group who assures their interests are attended to before
the enactments of laws which are intended to benefit every individual fairly and equally.

DO YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN?

Have you read any of the correspondence between me and the Law Society of Upper Canada?

I have forwarded you a copy of the BLACK BOOK which contains the correspondence I had with
their representatives up until September 1 2006 but there is a considerable amount more which I
would like to direct your attention to.

Lawyers don’t give a damn about the people’s Constitutional rights and have bestowed that as a
privilege upon them which is the accepted practice by all the members of the Society which
includes the provincial adjudicative agencies and the courts.

The whole damn justice system.

DO YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN?

Judge’s don’t become judges without considerable experience practicing law and as the Law
Society of Upper Canada has explained to me their members concerns are only to the best interest
of their clients and to that endeavor they feel free to tromp all over their clients adversaries
Constitutional rights.

There is much more than moral issues here for they have no conscience and feel they have the legal
right to do so and who of them would argue given the financial benefit to them all.

They are organized crime of the most high whose ingenious scheme is dependent on the loyalty or
naivety of those amongst or around them.

They are obviously not a secret society but they operate under a secret code which is only secret due
the ignorance and trusting nature of the people who actually have little choice but presume they are
intent on justice for the people.

All that stands between their form of justice and true Constitutional justice is the Wall of Ignorance
which would come tumbling down if you were to address the issues appropriately for the people
and not to continue acting appropriately for the conspiracy against the people, whether loyal or
naïve to their cause.

DO YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN?

The only difference between ignorance and intelligence is knowledge and the ability to use it for a
purpose.

2
The difference between good and evil is the purpose you use it.

You know full well what the people perceive as your intended purpose but your correspondence
betrays you clearly showing your inability to analyze the evidence or your reluctance to do so.

LAWYERS ARE NOT A VIABLE OPTION to me or any other person of moral purpose.

I have provided an attachment dated February 10 2007 regarding a personal incident which I had
reported to the Law Society of Upper Canada.

Their responses to me prove they have no concern for the guaranteed Charter rights of the people of
society and their only concern is to their society and its members who by their response of August
15 2006 clearly explains the Society’s role in society which is not consistent with the society
demanded by the Constitution Act, 1982 which guarantees clear and specific rights equally to each
individual.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or
physical disability.

This section: 15.(1) is clearly representative of that which would be expected of an ideology which
recognizes the supremacy of God as stated in the first line of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms.

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule
of law:

As you struggle to remain focused on the content of the 40 pages of the attachment I request that
you reflect a little on the fact that I have requested you to read it for the purpose of being coherent
to the facts so that you may act informed and appropriately for the people who you represent.
Assuming you are alert you will recognize the efforts I have made to this endeavor and have done
so to the best of my ability which has proven to be inadequate for more reason than just my
inexperience and incompetence as an author.

It is the inadequacies of the establishment to seek the truth for they are founded on deceit and intent
on covering this truth as they purport to seek the truth for the benefit of the people of society.

Though the entirety of the 40 page attachment there is an exorbitant number of words used to bring
attention to the fact that a lawyer wrote me to state that my contract with Dalglaish/Silverthorne had
been terminated because there was a completion date that I had not met and then went on to state
more malicious lies about my competence to fulfill the requirements of the contract.

Throughout the 40 pages I requested the lawyer to provide me and the Law Society a copy of the
contract which he referred to which would prove he had no authority to terminate the contract for it
clearly had no starting or completion date and in fact stated that I would be finished only when I
have fulfilled the requirements of the contract and Ms Silverthorne was completely satisfied that I
have done so. I will forward a copy of the contract upon request.

This doesn’t require a major court case to resolve considering the Law Society of Upper Canada
personnel are lawyers themselves who should be competent to see the injustice perpetrated by its
3
member who uttered lies for the benefit of his client who was not out to seek justice but in fact was
intent to use the system for his own evil purpose.

The legal system is not at all what the people are led to believe and only those with careers in the
system benefit which includes the criminal element for they know the inadequacies of the system
which is their business to know and use for their criminal purpose.

Ask any criminal if he is one and he will deny as sure as any lawyer who is willing to protect him
under the guise of assuring their rights are being protected as they step all over the moral peoples
rights while doing so.

DO YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN?

The peoples rights are a given, clearly defined in the Charter yet lawyers who we presume are on
the side of the law and a moral society prove by their actions they are not and what recourse does a
moral person have?

Hire a lawyer to take a lawyer to court where they will be judged by a lawyer who has already
proven that he has been successful in the deception?

I think not.

DO YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN?

A person is only entitled to the full protection of the law which he is entitled to which goes with the
presumption of innocence.

When clear evidence is provided that suggests one is not as innocent as presumed it is a logical
recourse that they be provided the opportunity to prove their innocence.

One of the best ways to do so is to allow an officer of the law to present the evidence which
suggests their non compliance with the law and request the person to cooperate in their investigation
to confirm their innocence as any moral innocent person would do.

Refusing to let an officer search ones premises in performance of his or her duty to gather evidence
is an obstruction of justice which benefits only the immoral for the victim is hindered from seeking
the evidence which would lead to justice and compensation.

What legitimate reason would a person have to deny a search that would prove them innocent where
cooperation aids in the sanctity of everyone’s guaranteed rights of protection.
It must be everyone’s duty to cooperate with the law

Surely one who steals from someone must be made to reimburse the victim and fully compensate
him for his trouble if justice is to be considered served.

When lawyers advise their clients of their rights not to speak to anyone without legal counsel they
do not consider the rights of the people of society to know the truth in seeking justice and to get it as
efficiently and cost effective as they can.

Truth is the magic word when it comes to justice.

4
Without it justice is improbable yet lawyers do their best to obscure it and the best make it to be
judges who purportedly seek the whole truth nothing but the truth
DO YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN?

The evidence in my particular situation regarding the criminal act of fraud by my former tenant is
irrefutable as you should already know having read my letter to the Toronto Sun dated October 8
2006 and yet injustice goes on as detailed in my 15 Lawyer Files which I have also sent you.

SURELY YOU MUST SEE WHAT I MEAN.

By the way, I have sent the evidence to more than 20 lawyers to act on my behalf but I have only
received one response which stated that it would literally require hundreds of hours to proceed and
he was alone in a small business that did not have the time to do the case justice but wished me
luck.

That describes the system very well and only those with money have the opportunity to play that
game of chance.
The more money the more luck.

That is what lawyers are all about and I should clarify that they are no different than any other
person whose conscience would be significantly tested given the opportunity of circumstance.

As is often said “But for circumstance go I”

I have brought all this and more to your attention for you to have the appropriate circumstance to
act on behalf of the people, your constituents and yourself to reveal the present and clear
circumstances which stand in the way of a moral society.

How obvious can it be that we need watchdogs to oversee watchdogs to the infinitive if we can not
trust you and others like you to look coherently at the evidence and respond likewise?

DO YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN?

If not you, then who?

I have written everyone I can possibly think of as you know, except perhaps the Queen and the
problem remains.

I have written the Governor General and the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario but they have found no
reason to respond.

The only way this rampant assault on the people by those with the opportunity to do so is to inform
the people of the truth and let nature take its course.

That is what you can do as you have the experience and knowledge to commence or cause to
commence proceedings which will eventually remediate the circumstances which allow the
pilfering of the people by the professionals who use the powers bestowed upon them by the

5
authority of the Constitution to bestow upon themselves a greater power for their personal benefit
humongously detrimental to the people and society as a whole whom they profess to serve.

I have every reason to believe that you as my representative are the appropriate person to
appropriately deal with these serious issues which are detrimental to your constituents and in fact to
people world wide.

Inspector Graeme Turl of the York Regional Police has advised me in his letter of August 16
2007 (Please see page 12) that the issues concerning the laws of Canada should be brought to
the attention of my MP and my MPP which I have persistently for some time now but Peter
Van Loan will not respond and you have declined to deal with the issues.

You have been armed with the evidence you need, you need only comprehend it and then act
appropriately for the people not the establishment which has conspired against them.

I am sure I have provided you more than an appropriate amount of evidence to assure you know
what I mean so I will presume that you DO KNOW WHAT I MEAN.

Now I suggest to you that your immediate action is required to demonstrate where you stand.

If you believe I am wrong in my analysis of the evidence you should not fear bringing it forth for
the people to decide and in fact if you are a people too it is incumbent upon you to do so.

Perhaps you feel they are too ignorant to decide and you could relay that message as well.

The evidence remains which includes your efforts of July 31 2007 which I dare say is far from
appropriate to the circumstances.

DO YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN?

Perhaps now that I have informed you that lawyers will not help me you might wonder why and
reread more closely that which I have intended to convey to you over the months.

I can not perceive that I have not provided you the irrefutable proof of what is wrong nor can I
believe that you are not coherent to the facts if you have applied yourself to that endeavor on behalf
of the people whom you proclaim to be for so I ask you to ponder the words above and below from
2500 years ago where the struggle of humankind persists today due the same reasons they did then.

It is not from not knowing what must be done for it has always been there for the doing

6
Integrity is a word which clearly defines what the personnel of the establishment profess they have
and their actions clearly are testament to the fact that they are unequivocal liars.

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be
deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

To me that clearly states that every individual is entitled to all the rights as defined in the Charter as
long as they are in compliance with the Charter and in respect of each individual’s equal rights not
to be deprived but when irrefutable evidence is provided that one acted in disrespect of the Charter
and an individuals guaranteed rights they are to be held in disrespect of their inherent Charter rights
in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice which is commonly known to humankind
and definitely not that which is provided and interpreted by the legal profession which defines
justice as getting all that they possibly can out of unfortunate circumstances brought to their
attention.

If you will imagine two lawyers discussing the outcome of a case, could you imagine the following
as a probable conversation between them?

If you had of done justice to that case Zeb, you would be retired and want for nothing.
Abe, I could never retire, this is what I do. I am a lawyer for God’s sake.

It’s the excitement of taking even the smallest case and developing it into a profitable entity that
would please the Gods without actually killing the innocent ignorant soles who we throw back into
the pool in consideration of the members of our society who appreciate that our efforts today assure
their affluent existence of tomorrow.

But what if the truth gets out Zeb?

Hell it’s already out. Why do you think we have so many Society members all feeding from the
trough of truth?
They’re dumb and we are smart. They get what they deserve and so do we.

Damn Zeb, you know what I mean. What if the people find out?

How Abe? How will they find out?

You know Julia Munro.

The question is will you do it?

Reality is a staggering number of truths which each truth is supported by a staggering amount of
evidence which support no lies but identify the liars.

One who proclaims to exist for the benefit of the people but refuses to act to that endeavor is more
than a liar but not less than a traitor.

I beseech you study the evidence until you are certain you are coherent to the facts and the issues I
have brought forth to you and act without prejudice or bias in service of the people.

That will require you to have an honest look at your self and what your true purpose is.
7
The evidence is clear as to what is expected of you considering all things that are real and once
again I suggest that if you have any doubt as to what the people want of you all you need do is ask
them.

You have the wherewithal and access to the media which I can only wish for or pass the
information to you and wish you do the honors.
Remember that mine is not a selfish wish for it is the wish of all humankind since the beginning of
time which we may eventually know once truth becomes the way and kneeling in prayer identified
for what it is.

A wasted effort wishing for something that one has given up on or never tried to understand to a
point of dealing with the reality which finds one on their knees.
Twenty billion people praying will not stop the floods and other effects of global warming nor
praying that someone else will solve the problem for it was someone else who caused it.

It surely wasn’t you or you who caused the problem and you on your knees surely are not helping
other than to keep out of the way of those who are actually trying.

Everyone can help in one way or another regardless of their familiarity with a problem for all they
need do is recognize the problem and see that it is tended to appropriately.

If I were with a person alone who just cut his arm off would I pray for a doctor or attempt to
improvise as if I was one?

Snap out of it where ever you are.

Delve into the evidence and look around you to see how things really are.

I thank you for your time and pray standing that you will make every effort to comprehend the
issues and why you who has earned a respected position of trust has been provided the opportunity
to strut your stuff in respect of that trust, the people and the principles the Constitution is founded
on.

If you should require more documentation or have any questions at all regarding my writings please
do not hesitate to e-mail me.

Only by meaningful dialogue can we remove any ambiguity that may exist in your mind and in that
endeavor I suggest that we meet.

Throughout my writings I have attempted to answer all the questions so they need not be asked but
if you have one that escaped me I would appreciate the opportunity to respond to it.

Surely you have given my writings some thought but I suggest not enough nor are you coherent to
the facts which call out loud and clear for your help which you would do so for the people if you
were indeed for the people and if indeed you are cognizant of the facts.

Don’t ask for whom the bell tolls for it tolls for thee……and me and everyone who hears it.

DO YOU HEAR IT?

8
With due respect I ask that you respect my concerns which should concern you as they would
concern anyone who is aware of my concerns.

Those people who have not responded and those who have, acted inappropriately in accordance
with the Constitution, the aspirations of God, and the people.

Those who responded as you did appropriate to the conspiracy would appear to the naïve that you
give sound advice but quite contraire to one privy of the facts and cares for the well being of the
people of society and respects each individuals guaranteed Charter rights as if they were their own
which of course would be if they were similarly respected by everyone.

PLEASE, PLEASE TELL ME THAT YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN.

Tell me you know that the Constitution is incapable of enforcement for it is just a document and tell
me that you know the administering and enforcement of the individual guaranteed Charter rights
must be done by the people financed to do so in a manner conducive to the Charter where
consistency is demanded to that endeavor so as to demonstrate due diligence to the guarantee which
is the catalyst intended to protect each and every individual equally, and any personnel in the
government employ assigned to the administration and enforcement must be held responsible to that
endeavor lest the guarantee be a worthless piece of paper as worthless as the person who failed the
people as assigned.

We can not correct the damage done but we can sure as hell be sure that person does not remain in
such a position so as to put our rights and freedoms in immanent danger.

Okay, I know you have to know what I mean or I am writing to a person reincarnated as a potato
with eyes and ears but nothing under the skin that resembles a brain or a heart which may influence
a conscience, which may very well exist in a potato for it is invisible to the common person, but
even the astute who may be blind and still see into one’s conscience may be well advised never to
suggest they have communicated with a potato unless of course they have studied it well as might a
farmer or a related specialists.

With just one more “DO YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN?” I depart anxiously awaiting any sign of
comprehension from your end.

I am not sorry if you find me to be a pain in the ass and I gladly say you are welcome if you are
pleased that I have brought these significant issues concerning the well being of the people to your
attention.

In either case, appropriate action is demanded and one would be wise given the choice to take the
option which leaves them in charge of their destiny.

You know what I mean.

Sincerely
Frank Gallagher

PS

9
I may not have dotted every I or crossed every t for I trust the program to do it and when I and the
people can trust the establishment to do what is necessary for the benefit of the people we will know
that there is a program in place which we have good reason to trust.

Your focus to the relevant facts in the attachment “Law Society” is requested and necessary to
derive at the appropriate conclusion.

Although there is a lot to read it all has significant purpose relative to the well being of the people
which is your legitimate purpose.

Speed reading will satisfy your conscience that you have read it but your response will reveal the
truth of so many things, perhaps at least one more than you realize.

You need not fear the truth if you are honest and forthright. Please change He to She in the
following statement to retain focus as to whom it is directed.

THRESHOLD FOR A CRIMINAL PROSECUTION

On page 12 is a copy of a response from the York Regional Police dated August 16 2007 which
once again states that I was informed that the facts of my incident didn’t meet the threshold for a
criminal prosecution.

I have repeatedly requested that the YRP inform me as to what the threshold is as well as the
other police departments but they refuse to answer.

I have also asked if it has anything to do with the amount of money involved and I suspect perhaps
the problem is there is no money to be made by the legal people and justice is not served.

The fact that they condone such criminal acts in their courts clearly shows their concern for the law
and the protection of the people.
The best way to deal with crime is to stop it before it happens and that is the ideology of
punishment to deter crime.

By not dealing with such cases crime can only spread as the word is passed along to the immoral
and of course when crime flourishes so does the legal system to the great detriment of the people.

I will forward the YRP a copy of this letter requesting once again that they answer this question?

I reiterate that if you have attentively studied my writings in particular the letter to the Toronto Sun
dated October 8 2006 you will know that the evidence irrefutably proves the criminal acts were
committed by Don Wilson my former tenant.

The recording of the Tribunal hearing TNL-67103 clearly proves the same thing and I have
provided the YRP with a copy.

10
I notice that each time a different person from the YRP reviews the evidence they actually just look
for what ever their personnel have previously stated and reiterate their words where not one has
addressed the issues.

I reiterate they have every piece of evidence that could possibly be required to support my
allegations so it would be impossible to ever prosecute anyone for criminal acts.

THESE ARE VERY SERIOUS MATTERS AND I ADAMANTLY REQUEST YOU REVIEW
THE EVIDENCE WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND BIAS.

SINCERELY
Frank Gallagher

PS

Chief Armand P LaBarge

York Regional Police

Please personally respond to the “threshold” matter above stating clearly where the evidence I have
provided you concerning the criminal act of fraud committed by Don Wilson my former tenant in a
court room financed by the people to administer justice to and for the people in the endeavor to
protect them in accordance with the provisions of the Charter by administering punishment to deter
crime before it is committed, falls short of the “threshold for a criminal prosecution”.

The evidence is quite clear that the only thing that falls short is the entire legal system.

It has been over 2 years since I began my trek for justice and you have the records of my trek
which clearly shows I have circled, crisscrossed and proliferated the system with pertinent
documents vital to the sanctity of the people’s Charter rights and their well being.

I will be faxing you a copy of the 40 page document regarding the law society which clearly shows
where the problem lies in the system.

How can we possibly expect our rights to be protected controlled by lawyers whose professional
conduct is monitored by the Law Society of Upper Canada who clearly state their lawyer members
only responsibility is to the interest of their clients an other words where the money comes from.

The evidence is clear and the people desperately need your help.

Peter Van Loan, MP

As my Federal representative I request you apply yourself attentively to the issues addressed above
I need not explain further as to how serious these issues are.

The obstruction of Justice by Hon. John Garretsen addressed in Lawyer File # 3 and other writings
is an example of the disregard for the laws of Ontario and Canada by the personnel of the
establishment and I obviously request you deal with him in the appropriate manner consistent with
the spirit of the Constitution in respect of the people’s perspective.

11
12