Integrity

Truth in the spirit as well as the letter of the law franklyone@ hotmail.com

September 4, 2007

Dear OACP

I have a serious problem regarding the administration and enforcement of law in Ontario and quite probably
it is inherent though out Canada.

I have irrefutable evidence that my former tenant and President, CEO, Director, etal of a company called Bio
Safe Natural Technologies Inc. alias Bio Safe Natural Products Inc. which I am a major investor, committed
the criminal act of fraud over $100,000 and filed false and misleading information over $43,000 on the first
day of the hearing June 30 2005 at the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal at 375 D”arcy Street, Newmarket,
which the judicator Nancy Fahlgren is well aware of and in fact she made a comment “ I see what is
happening” and I said “There oughta be a law” and she responded,“There is” and went on for a couple of
minutes to articulate how she has the authority to forward it on to the Investigations and Enforcement Unit of
the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and yada yada but didn’t state that she would although I
presumed she would. I asked her “Is that a rec” when she abruptly said “Yes, it is a recorder” I asked if I
would be able to get a copy and she said “Yes, after the hearing I could get a copy from her office”

The second day July 28 2005 Nancy Fahlgren stated at the beginning of the hearing that there would not be a
recording of the day’s hearing.

On August 8 2005 she signed an Order TNL-67103 which found for me and my former tenant was ordered to
vacate my premises as he had given notice that he would and was ordered to pay me approximately
$10, 000 in arrears of rent precisely as I claimed..

On August 10 2005 when I received the Order there was no mention if proceedings were to be commenced
or caused to be commenced against Don Wilson so I phoned the ORHT to enquire and also order a copy of
the recording of the hearing. I was abruptly told that I couldn’t speak with Judicator Nancy Fahlgren and
When I received a copy of the recording 1
nobody could tell me if proceedings were commenced.

When I faxed the ORHT on August 28 and 30 2005 to enquire as to whether or not charges would be laid
against Don Wilson I was informed by the Regional Manager Rick Hennessey by mail dated August 30 2005
that the Order has been made, the file closed and the ORHT would not be keeping the two letters I sent on
file and returned copies of them to me.

Meanwhile I faxed the Investigations and Enforcement beginning August 10 2005 and quite a few days of
faxing correspondence and evidence to them requesting all responses be in writing and immediate phone
calls back from staff wondering what I want them to do with it and why do I want written responses on I
finally got one by mail dated September 6 2005 from Dave Grech, Coordinator, Investigations who
explained why they would not commence or cause to commence proceedings against don Wilson.

For the top man in the department his response was as ridiculous as the dispute which Don Wilson had filed.
His response was absolutely incoherent to the facts.

So I wrote him again on September 13 2005 but this time decided to drive downtown to his office from
Keswick to walk him through it and provide copies of all the evidence again to make sure he had it and I
provided a disk copy of the Tribunal hearing which I had to leave with Roel Pascual because Dave was not
available.

Having not received a response from Dave Grech I wrote him again on October 3 2005 but no response.

By now I realized there had to be a whole lot more going on than meets the eye.

Why was his office so reluctant to write to me explaining why they would not respond and why did it take
near a month for him to respond with such ridiculous reasons for not commencing or causing to commence
proceedings against Don Wilson.

When I called the ORHT on August 25 2005 wondering where my CD copy was a girl named Cathy #153
said she would look into it and on the 26th I received a call saying it was ready.

When I picked it up and played it I noticed that all the previously mentioned conversations with Nancy
Fahlgren were missing from the tape.

Then I pondered as to why the 2nd day of the hearing July 28 2005 was not recorded.

Something was obviously wrong.

I mean here we have a person who had signed two agreements with a phony signature and denied having
ever seen them before and never signed them.
I provided the witness to one of the agreements who attested to the fact that Don Wilson did sign the four
pages of one of them.
Both were signed with the same fraudulent signature for the purpose of denying them and they both were
basically the same content dealing with matters of rent and other matters concerning other money he owed
me and other matters pertaining to shares of the company which were attachments to my purchase
agreements and other investors covering some shady actions taken by Don in the original agreements.

My mother signed the other agreement but I had not brought her to the Tribunal. She is 85 now and quite
well but who knows if she will be available if this drags out another couple of years.

The dispute Don Wilson filed with the ORHT is a ridiculous fabrication which I proved decisively.
2
So here I have irrefutable evidence that Don Wilson committed the criminal act of fraud regarding the 2
agreements and filed false and misleading information regarding the dispute he filed with the ORHT in a
building financed by the people to administer justice to and for the people before the judicator and the ORHT
won’t even discuss it, tampered with the evidence and didn’t record the second day of the hearing.

The Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs were reluctant to respond in
writing as to why they wouldn’t commence or cause to commence proceedings, but due to my persistence 27
days later Dave Grech gave in and responded incoherent to the facts and after much effort to explain his
errors including driving downtown with a complete fresh new copy of the evidence and a CD recording of
the hearing which irrefutably proves that which I allege he has refused to respond.

I wrote my MPP Julia Munro, the Attorney General and the Premier Dalton McGuinty among others and
Julia suggested I write the Ombudsman which I had done already and Dalton suggested I write the Minister
of Municipal Affairs and Housing Hon John Gerretsen which I did and he informed me that the ORHT was
an independent body at arms length of the government and couldn’t interfere and as for Dave Grech he trusts
him and sees no point in looking at the evidence so the case is closed.

I downloaded the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 to find that it is indeed an offense to furnish false and
misleading information under s.206 (2) of the Act and it is an offense to harass, hinder, obstruct or interfere
with a landlord under s.206 (1) 6. I

Tenant Protection Act, 1997

Offence

206 (1) Any person who knowingly does any of the following
6. Harass, hinder, obstruct or interfere with a landlord in the exercise of,
i. securing a right or seeking relief under this Act or in the court, or

(2) Any person who does any of the following is guilty of an offence:

1. Furnish false or misleading information in any material filed in any proceeding under this Act or provided
to the Tribunal, an employee or official of the Tribunal, an inspector, an investigator, the Minister or a
designate of the Minister.

So why would they do that?

Obviously there is a whole lot more at stake here than is immediately present.

It seems to me that Rick Hennessey wouldn’t likely act so strange if things were on the up and up and what
skin is it off his ass if he forwards the case onto the Investigations and Enforcement Unit as is the proper and
legal thing to do?

Why the messing with the evidence and why didn’t they record the second day?

Why was Dave’s office so reluctant to respond in writing and when Dave did why was his response so
ridiculous?

Why does Hon John Gerretsen trust Dave Grech when all he had to do was look at his response and the
evidence which I provided him which he states he read both?
3
Tenant Protection Act, 1997

Duties of Minister

200. The Minister shall,

(a) monitor compliance with this Act;
(b) investigate cases of alleged failure to comply with this Act; and
(c) where the circumstances warrant, commence or cause to be commenced proceedings with respect to
alleged failures to comply with this Act. 1997, c. 24, s. 200.

Clearly it was Minister Honorable John’s duty to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997
at the time.

Clearly the ORHT acted under the authority of the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 at the time.

Why would Honorable John state that he can’t get involved with the ORHT decision?

Why didn’t Honorable John do his duty and investigate the case of alleged failure to comply with the Act
and commence or cause to commence proceedings as they certainly are warranted?

Quite probably a lot of your members will know at a glance and be able to offer sound suggestions.

Perhaps if you tabled it or sent it out to the Chiefs they may like to take a crack at it just for the fun of it or
for any reason at all I would appreciate hearing from them.

It seems like quite a serious matter to me and quite likely they wouldn’t care to get involved.

Anyway I would appreciate any and all the help I can get.

Thank you,
Frank Gallagher