Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to The Classical Weekly
This content downloaded from 140.206.154.236 on Sun, 02 Apr 2017 05:28:00 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
30 CLASSICAL WEEKLY
intended to say. I quote the whole passage (verses we may do here at Allegheny College with Arnobius
17-9) in the King James version, except for the word the coming year.
avoid': The purpose of this example is to present one way
Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things
in which the work of the project is being facilitated.
honest in the sight of all men. If it be possible, as much
as lieth in youL, live peaceably with all men. Dearly be- Many will be interested in working in some field or
loved, avenge not yourselves, but rather avoid wrath; for author of their choice. Whatever the method is, the
it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the important fact, as Father Marique recently remarked,
Lord.
is that "although we have many collaborators we have
Those who essay to publish a translation of the New by no means a sufficient number for the gigantic
Testament should stuidy modern Greek. task." It is hoped that in the very near future many
DONALD BLYTHE DURHAM scholars will write to him to express a desire to con-
HAMILTON COLLEGE tribute to an undertaking which will result in a great
monument of the scholarship of Christian tradition.
This content downloaded from 140.206.154.236 on Sun, 02 Apr 2017 05:28:00 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
CLASSICAL WEEKLY 31
This content downloaded from 140.206.154.236 on Sun, 02 Apr 2017 05:28:00 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
32 CLASSICAL WEEKLY
This content downloaded from 140.206.154.236 on Sun, 02 Apr 2017 05:28:00 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
CLASSICAL WEEKLY 33
coulrse ut and the subjunctive, the subjunctive alone, plain, namely, the use of the present participle where a
and quod or quia and the subjunctive or indicative are third singular perfect indicative active would be ex-
found. These constructions show that the classical in- pected, e.g., ministros convocans, hisque astantibus
finitive with the subject in the accusative is giving waypraecepit (563. I).-
to the Romance analytical idiom in indirect discourse. In fine we can draw from the evidence gathered from
Debeo is uised many times with merely volitive or Arbeo two general conclusions about the eighth cen-
futiuritive significance, e.g., praecepisset ut . . custodire
tury: (i) that Latin was well on its way toward the
deberetur (578.I4) and confitente ut vitam mUtare Romance developments, but (2) that the written Latin
debuisset (563.25). This use of a helping verb shows was still reflecting the vernacular and had not yet
the weakening of the modal force in the subjunctive become a dead language.
and the rise of auxiliary verbs to replace modal forms. JONAH W. D. SKILES
Lastly, there is one recurrent oddity that I cannot ex- WESTMINSTER COLLEGE, MISSOURI
REVTIEWS Miss Bodkin does not take the next step in the
analogy, although it seems important to do so if we
The Quest for Salvation in an Ancient and a are not to find ourselves sharing- the bewilderment of
Modern Play. By MAUD BODKIN. 54 pa g-es. the Ox-
malority of the characters in Eliot's play. That is to
ford University Press, London I94I ($.85) say, in both plays, the execution of the will of God and
A modern play which is frankly modeled after an suibmission to it are involved. It is significant that
ancient Greek tragedy might be expected to attract a Acschylus chose to have Athena cast the deciding, vote
classicist into a study in comparisons. However, in The at the trial of Orestes, thus making her the agent for
Qnecst for Salvation in an Ancient and a Modern Play, the execution of the divine will, as she was also to
it is a psychologist, not a classicist, who is comparing become the agent for bringing about the conversion
the work of the modern playwright, The Family Re- and stibmission of the Furies to that same divine will.
union by T. S. Eliot, with its Greek prototype, the Similarly, the role which Agatha plays is consistent
Etumenides of Aeschylus. It is not surprising, therefore,
with the way in which God causes His will to be exe-
to find that Miss Bodkin has approached her subject cutted at the present time, that is, through human
from a psychological viewpoint; and the fact that her agency and through spiritual forces, rather than by
book throws light upon two plays which have signifi- the direct intervention of a divine being. If, as Miss
cance for oLur day makes it especially provocative and Bodkin feels, Eliot was dealing here solely with indi-
livcly. vidulal salvation, his thesis is strangely inconsistent with
Both plays deal with the pursuit by the Furies of an the burden of his other writings.
individual sinner, with his quest for salvation, and withi One wonders why she questions the element of two-
his final deliverance, involving the transformation of fold salvation in The Family Reunion, while she admits
his pursuers. Briefly, Miss Bodkin's comparison runs its achievement in the Eumenides. We know that Eliot
thuLs: The Furies in Eliot's play are not mere projec- has a plan for reorganizing the world, based upon the
tions of an individual conscience, but, like the Erinyes principles and teachings of Christ. To anyone who
of Aeschvluis, are ministers of an impersonal law of reads the description of his idea,1 it is apparent that
retribution having the aspect not only of malignant he, like Harry, has seen a vision, but that he, too, is
revenge, but also of primitive justice. In both plays the at a loss to make that vision completely articulate so
Fturies are the embodiment of an intangible force which that others may understand. After Harry's deliverance,
emanates from the wrongs of past generations and his relatives arrive at the mistaken conclusion that he
works with the power of "causal efficacy" through later is to become a missionary; and he is unable to explain
generations. They are also the embodiment of a curse that there is much more than that to his decision.
(alias "repetition-compulsion") which is the energy of In the ancient play we have little more than the
passion fixed in an evil relationship or custom. When promise of blessings resulting from the achievement of
this energy is released and redirected, it becomes the communal salvation. It remained for history to write of
sustaining force of a better order of individual and social its stuccess or failure. So also with the suggestion of
life. In Aeschylus this release and change in relation- world deliverance today through the realization of
ships between the protagonist and his pursuers is Harry's (or Eliot's) vision. His plan is yet untried, and
wrought by the direct persuasion of Athena. In Eliot's it remains for history to write the verdict.
play the transformation is the result of the redirection The fact that one does not necessarily agree with
by his Aunt Agatha of the protagonist's mind into Miss Bodkin at every point does not detract from the
channels of remembrance and analysis of the experi-
lCf. T. S. Eliot, The Idea of a Christian Society, Harcourt,
ences of his unhappy childhood. Brace, New York, 1940.
This content downloaded from 140.206.154.236 on Sun, 02 Apr 2017 05:28:00 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms