Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s12010-013-0357-1
Abstract Antimicrobial activity of silver nanoparticles is gaining importance due its broad
spectrum of targets in cell compared to conventional antimicrobial agents. In this context,
silver nanoparticles were synthesized by gamma irradiation-induced reduction method of
acrylamide and itaconic acid with irradiation dose up to 70 kGy. Silver nanoparticles were
examined by Fourier-transform infrared, scanning electron microscopic images (SEM), and
ultravioletvisible spectrophotometer. The particle size was determined by X-ray diffraction,
transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and dynamic light scattering. The antibacterial
effect was studied by disk diffusion method against some bacterial pathogenic strains. Silver
nanoparticles showed promising activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and slightly
active against Escherichia coli, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and Klebsiella
pneumonia. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles was tested against P. aeruginosa.
The killing rate of P. aeruginosa was found to be 90 % of viability at (100 l/ml) of silver
nanoparticles. Exposure of P. aeruginosa cells to silver nanoparticles caused fast loss of
260 nm absorbing materials and release of potassium ions. The TEM and SEM observation
showed that silver nanoparticles may destroy the structure of bacterial cell membrane in
order to enter the bacterial cell resulting in the leakage of the cytoplasmic component and the
eventual death.
Introduction
The growth of unwanted bacteria has for a long time been and is still a problem for the food
industry and in the medical field. Therefore, there is a need for methods to kill or slow down
the growth of unwanted bacteria. Resistance in human pathogens is a big challenge in fields
like pharmaceutical and biomedicine. Antibiotic resistance profiles lead to fear about the
transmission electron microscope (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and scan
electron microscope (SEM). The bactericidal activity using silver nanoparticles was
carried out by determine bacterial killing kinetics, MIC and MBC determination,
release of cellular materials and finally the interaction between silver nanoparticles
and bacteria using SEM and TEM.
Chemicals
Acrylamide (AAm) of purity of 99.9 % (Merck, Germany) itaconic acid (IA) of purity
99.9 % (Aldrich, Germany), silver nitrate, and isopropyl alcohol were used in this study.
Aqueous solution of 1 g of AAm, 0.1 g of IA, and 5 mmol AgNO3 were dissolved in 5 ml distilled
water then added 0.15 ml isopropyl alcohol as scavenger of hydroxyl radical. The prepared
solutions placed in glass test tubes and gamma irradiated to 5, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 70 kGy at
ambient temperature using a Co60 gamma source. The prepared hydrogel embedded silver
nanoparticles obtained in cylindrical shapes were cut into 2 mm and dried for constant weight.
Characterization
The dried hydrogels were ground to a fine powder, then mixed with dried KBr, and pressed
to a disk for IR analysis. FTIR spectra of hydrogels measured by FTIR spectrometer (6300,
JASCO Japan) in the range from 400 to 4,000 cm1.
UV-Vis Spectrophotometry
Preliminary characterization of the formed silver nanoparticles in the hydrogels was carried
out using UV-Vis spectroscopy. Usually, silver (Ag) nanoparticles exhibit unique and
tunable optical properties due to their surface plasmon resonance that are dependent on
shape, size, and the distribution of the nanoparticles [18]. UV-Vis absorption spectra of the
hydrogelsilver nanocomposites were recorded on JASCO V 560 UV/Vis spectrophotom-
eter with a scan range of 300600 nm. For this study, silver nanoparticles were extracted
from hydrogelsilver nanocomposites by soaked in distilled water (10 mg hydrogel/ml H2O)
over a period of a week at room temperature; the supernatant was used to measure the
absorption spectra. The distilled water was used as a blank solution.
XRD Investigation
The XRD method was used to identify the silver nanoparticles in the polymer
nanocomposites. These measurements were carried out on Shimadzu X-ray diffrac-
tometer (XRD-6000 model) equipped with X-ray tube [Cu target, 40 kV (voltage),
30 mA (current)]. The X-ray data were recorded in the range from 4 to 90 2 with
continuous scanning mode and scanning speed 8 /min. The average particle size of
472 Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2013) 171:469487
the nanoparticles was calculated from the full width at half maximum (FWHM) and
the peak position of XRD line broadened according to the Scherrer equation:
.
d K b cos
where d is the particle size, K=0.89 is the Scherrer constant related to the shape and index (hkl)
of the crystals, is the wavelength of the X-ray (Cu Ka, 1.54056), is the diffraction angle,
and is the corrected full width at half maximum (in radian) [19].
To measure the particle size by DLS, finely grounded hydrogels silver nanoparticles powder
(0.01 g) were extracted in 20 ml bidistilled water, stirred for 30 min until become homoge-
neous, filtered, and the supernatant was measure by Zeta Potential/Particle Sizer
NICOMPTM 380 ZLS Pss. NICOMP particle sizing systems Santa Barbara, CA, USA [20].
A JEOL-JSM-5400 scanning electron microscope (Japan) was used for investigating the
pore structure of different hydrogels at high magnification and resolution by means of
energetic electron beam. The exchange Ag was characterized by EDX Oxford-ISIS attached
to SEM-JEOL-5400 with voltage of 20 keV. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) investi-
gate the morphological changes of tested P. aeruginosa were treated by 50 l/ml of hydrogel
silver nanopartictes prepared by irradiation dose 20 kGy compared with untreated strain.
Strain were prepared by cutting the agar, fixed for a minimum of 3 h in 2.5 %v/v glutaral-
dehyde 100 mM phosphate buffer solution of pH 7.2 and then fixed in 1 %w/v osmium
tetraoxide for 1 h at 300 C. After each fixation, the cells were washed twice with phosphate-
buffered saline (PBS), dried, and then coated with gold coater for 5 min. The coated samples
were examined with SEM [21].
Applications
The following human bacterial pathogens both Gram-positive MRSA and Gram-negative E.
coli, K. pneumonia, and P. aeruginosa as multidrug-resistant strains were purchased from
Microbiological Department in NCRRT Atomic Energy Authority Egypt. Cultures were
grown on nutrient agar plate and maintained in the nutrient agar slants at 4 C. Overnight
culture in the nutrient broth was used for the present experimental study.
Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2013) 171:469487 473
Disk diffusion assay was performed to determine the antibacterial activity of silver
nanoparticles in triplicates [22]. Overnight cultures of tested pathogens which contain
approximately 106107 colony forming unit were swabbed over the surface of sterile
MuellerHinton agar plates using sterile cotton swabs. Disks impregnated with silver
nanoparticles prepared with irradiation doses (20, 30, 40, 50, and 70 kGy) compared to
plain hydrogel were applied on the solid agar medium by pressing slightly and incubated at
322 C for 24 h. After incubation, the zone of inhibition was measured and expressed as
zone of sensitivity millimeter in diameter.
To examine the bacterial killing kinetics of silver nanoparticles, a modified method de-
scribed by Pal et al. [23] was followed. P. aeruginosa was grown in 10 ml of nutrient broth
supplemented with different concentrations (10, 15, 25, 50, 75, and 100 l/ml) of silver
nanoparticles irradiated by 20 kGy at 32 C without agitation. Killing kinetic rates and
bacterial concentrations were determined by measuring the colony forming unit in the
nutrient agar plates. Percentage of bacterial growth inhibition was calculated according to
equation of Shahi et al. [24].
.
BGI% BCBT 100 BC
where BGI is the bacterial growth inhibition, BC is number of bacterial colonies in the
control, and BT is number of bacterial colonies in the treatment.
For determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of silver nanoparticles required for
the inhibition of P. aeruginosa, broth dilution method was used. This method facilitates the
testing of inhibitory activity at various silver nanoparticle concentrations. Nutrient broth was
supplemented with different concentration of nanoparticles (5200 l/ml) and inoculated
with bacterial suspension (initial inoculums, 3108 CFU/ml). Control tube was maintained
without silver nanoparticles. The MIC was determined after 24 h of incubation at 37 C by
observing the visible turbidity and measuring the optical density of these culture broths at
600 nm [25]. The MIC is the lowest concentration of antimicrobial agents that completely
visually inhibits 99 % growth of the microorganisms. The MIC measurement was done in
triplicate to confirm the value of MIC for tested bacteria.
The concentration of free potassium ions in bacterial suspension was measured after
exposure to different concentrations of silver nanoparticles 50 l, 100 l in sterile peptone
474 Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2013) 171:469487
water (0.1/100 ml) for 0, 30, 60, and 120 min. At each pre-established interval, the
extracellular potassium concentration was measured by photometer (Alfa Wassermann
Starlyte 111, Na+, K+, Cl analyzer). Control flasks without silver nanoparticles were
tested similarly. Results were expressed as amount of extracellular free potassium
(mmol/l) in the growth media in each interval of incubation [26].
The measure of the release of 260 nm absorbing material from P. aeruginosa cells
under study was carried out in aliquots of 2 ml of the bacterial inocula in sterile
peptone water added to different concentrations of silver nanoparticles (25, 75, and
100 l) at 32 C. After 120 min of treatment, cells were centrifuged at 3,500 rpm,
and the absorbance of the obtained supernatant was measured spectrophotometrically
using JASCO V 560 UV/VIS spectrophotometer at 260 nm to detect the bacterial cell
damage [26].
In order to find out and elucidate the antibacterial mechanism of silver nanoparticles,
scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy techniques were used.
Cells of P. aeruginosa before and after treatment were fixed overnight with 2.5 % glutar-
aldehyde. For SEM, these cells were then fixed in 1 %w/v osmium tetra oxide for 1 h, at
300 C; after each fixation, the cells were washed twice with PBS, dried, and then examined
with SEM. For TEM, samples were postfixed in 2 % osmium tetraoxide, dehydrated in a
series of graded ethanol, infiltrated, and embedded in LR white resin. Then, ultrathin
sections (5070 nm thickness) were cut, stained with uranyl acetate and counter stained
with 4 % lead citrate. These sections were mounted on carbon coated copper grids and
inserted into TEM [21].
rays
H2 O RH:HO; e aqetc 1 radical formation
(2) initiation
Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2013) 171:469487 475
(3) Copolymerization
(4) macroradical
formation
(5) crosslinking
The solvated electrons e aq and H are strong reducing agents so that the silver ions
reduced into the zero-valet state:
Ag e aq Ag 6
Ag H Ag H 7
In contrast, hydroxyl radical (OH) is a powerful oxidizing species that able to oxidize the
ions or the atoms into a higher oxidation state, and thus to compensate the reduction reactions 6
and 7. For this reason, isopropyl alcohol as OH radical scavenger was added to this solution.
The OH radicals capable of abstracting hydrogen from the alcohol producing isopropyl radical,
which acts as a reducing agent to reduce silver ion (reactions 8 and 9) [28]
CH3 2 CHOH OH CH3 2 C OH H2 O 8
Characterization
UV-Vis Spectra
Fig. 1 FTIR spectra of a P(AAm/IA) and b P(AAm/IA)-Ag nanoparticles hydrogels prepared at 30 kGy
Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2013) 171:469487 477
single narrow peak in the UV-Vis spectra, which means the size distribution of the silver
nanoparticles is narrow. At higher irradiation dose, such as 20 and 30 kGy, the peak
intensities found to be higher (0.708 and 0.72) than that in 5 kGy (0.65) and that
means there is more yield of silver nanoparticles. The peaks at 20 and 30 kGy are
somewhat broader than that at 5 kGy, which means that the silver nanoparticles size
distribution is broadened. At a higher irradiation dose at 40 and 50 kGy, the peak is
the broadest and the intensity is the lowest (0.692 and 0.68). The reason can be
attributed to the degradation effect of gamma radiation on the prepared hydrogels.
It is known that, at low irradiation dose, the hydrogels are much cross-linked and less
degraded, and so the silver particles are well fixed by the amide and carboxylic group in the
hydrogel network and they less agglomerate. When much hydrogel are degrade into the
small fragments at high irradiation dose, some silver particles that cannot be enveloped in
the hydrogel network agglomerate into big particles. And so, the silver particles number
decrease and the size distribution is broadened. Figure 2 showed that the absorption peak for
5 kGy at 395 nm was red shifted to 435 nm for 20 and 30 kGy, and a further red shift to 445
and 465 nm for 40 and 50 kGy was observed. Furthermore, it clearly confirms that no
aggregations or cluster formation of silver particles because of complete absence of peaks or
tails at 560 nm.
X-ray Diffraction
In order to confirm the identity of the nanoparticles, X-ray diffraction technique was
employed. As shown in Fig. 3a, the observed peak around 2 value 20 corresponds
to the amorphous nature of hydrogels. Figure 3bf containing diffraction signals at 2
values of 37.7, 43.9, 64.3, and 77.4 attributed to the diffraction (111), (200),
(220), and (311) planes of the bulk Ag, respectively, which can be assigned to Ag
face cubic center structure silver nanoparticles confirming the presence of silver
nanoparticles in the hydrogel nanocomposites [33, 34]. Interestingly, the XRD patterns
do not exhibit any characteristic diffraction peaks of blank hydrogel (Fig. 3a).
478 Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2013) 171:469487
From the full width at half maximum, the particle size for the sample can be calculated.
According to the Scherrer formula,
.
d K b cos
where d is the particle size, K=0.89 is the Scherrer constant related to the shape and index
(hkl) of the crystals, is the wavelength of the X-ray (Cu Ka, 1.54056 ), is the diffraction
Fig. 3 XRD pattern of a P(AAm/IA) 30 kGy and P(AAm/IA)-Ag nanoparticles hydrogels prepared by
different irradiation dose of bf 20, 30, 40, 50, and 70 kGy, respectively
Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2013) 171:469487 479
angle, and is the corrected full width at half maximum (in radian). The average crystallite
size of different Ag nanoparticles was represented in Table 1. From the table, it can be notice
that the particle size decrease by increasing of irradiation dose up to 50 kGy then increase at
70 kGy which may be attributed to the increase of the degree of cross-linking by increasing
the irradiation dose. It is well known that the degrees of conversion and cross-linking greatly
depend on the irradiation dose.
The higher exposure dose means longer exposure time, which consequently prolongs the
propagation step of the process of copolymerization leading to higher degrees of conversion
and cross-linking. The decrease in the particle size by increasing of irradiation dose up to
50 kGy may be because of increasing the cross-linking percentage in the hydrogels, which
lead to reduce the free volume available for the formation of Ag nanoparticles by increasing
the tightness of the network structure. The results indicate that the higher irradiation dose
leads to the narrower phase transition, which may hinder the aggregations or cluster
formation of larger silver particle size.
Figure 5 shows TEM image and the particle size distribution of silver nanoparticles
stabilized by P(AAm/IA) hydrogel prepared by gamma irradiation at a total dose of
50 kGy with starting AgNO3 concentration of 5 mmol. It can be seen that the silver
nanoparticles formed in the cross-linked networks are spherical in shape and well dispersed
without aggregation. The size distributions were obtained by measuring the diameters of 37
particles in three images of an arbitrarily chosen area of TEM image (Fig. 5b). As can be
seen, a small particle size in the range of 2555 nm has been observed (mean
diameter=42.53 nm), and most of the nanoparticles are separated from each other due to
the protection by hydrogels. A small size of nanoparticles are seen in TEM micrographs
indicates a good stabilization of silver nanoparticles in P(AAm/IA) hydrogels.
Fig. 5 Typical TEM images (a) and histogram of particle size distribution (b) from the as-made silver nanoparticle
samples prepared with a total dose of 50 kGy and starting AgNO3 concentration of 5 mM (bar scale, 500 nm)
Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2013) 171:469487 481
Fig. 6 DLS measurement of silver nanoparticle samples prepared with a total dose of 50 kGy and starting
AgNO3 concentration of 5 mmol
was found to be about 72.3 nm. The large Ag nanoparticles measured by DLS compared to
that measured by X-ray and TEM analysis was because this method measures hydrodynamic
diameter, which is greater due to the polymer attached to the particles and may be due to the
association and chance of aggregation into larger size via van der Waal's force or hydrogen
bond [35, 36]. The decrease in the Ag nanoparticle size under these conditions may be
because the Ag nanoparticles found to be far apart from each other and decrease their chance
for aggregation into larger size.
Applications
Fig. 7 a Zone of inhibition (ZOI) for tested pathogenic strains against silver nanoparticles at different
gamma irradiation doses and b photograph showing zone of inhibition for P. aeruginosa against silver
nanoparticles at different irradiation doses: 1 (20 kGy), 2 ( blain hydrogel), 3 (30 kGy), 4 (40 kGy), 5
(50 kGy), and 6 (70 kGy)
Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2013) 171:469487 483
ranging from 10 to 100 g/ml (Table 2). The presence of these particles at a
concentration 10 g/ml inhibits bacterial growth by 8.57%. By increasing the amount
of silver nanoparticles to 25, 50, 75, and 100 g/ml, the number of bacterial colonies,
grown on plates is gradually reduced. The silver nanoparticle concentration of
100 g/ml shows 90% inhibition of P. aeruginosa colonies growth on nutrient agar
medium. As a result, in comparison to antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles
prepared by other authors [39], these particles have a relatively good biocidal effect
depending on the concentration of silver nanoparticles as well as on the CFU of the
bacteria used in the experiments.
Previous studies also showed that there are several mechanisms about the bactericidal
effect of silver nanoparticles. Silver nanoparticles may attach to the surface of the cell
membrane, interrupting permeability and metabolic pathways of the cell [40]. Silver
nanoparticles not only interact with the surface of the membrane but can also penetrate into
the bacterial cell membrane [41]. In addition, silver nanoparticles can bind to the DNA
inside the bacterial cells, preventing its replication or interaction with the bacterial ribosome
[42, 43]. It has been discovered that silver nanoparticles can damage the structure of the
bacterial cell membrane and reduce the activity of some membranous enzymes, which cause
E. coli bacteria to die eventually [44].
Silver nanoparticles were selected to study MIC and MBC using the broth dilution
method. MIC of silver nanoparticles against P. aeruginosa at a concentration 110 l/ml
showed bacteriostatic compound and the MBC or bactericidal effects against P.
aeruginosa, which was 125 l/ml. Silver nanoparticles exerted a bactericidal effect
against the bacterial strain under study because the MBC/MIC ratio values were lower
than 1.2 [3].
The results of loss 260-nm absorbing materials of P. aeruginosa cells treated with
silver nanoparticles at (25, 75 and 100 l/ml) and release of potassium ions at (50
and 100 l/ml) are shown in Figs. 8 and 9, respectively. The DO260 nm of the filtrate
of the cells exposed to silver nanoparticles revealed an increasing release of 260 nm
absorbing material according to the time exposure and silver nanoparticles concentra-
tion. The efflux of potassium ions from P. aeruginosa cells occurred immediately after
the addition of silver nanoparticles following a steady loss along the evaluated
intervals. No leakage of potassium ions was observed when the strain grew in media
0 280 0
10 256 8.57
15 215 23.2
25 169 39.6
50 100 64.3
75 65 76.8
100 29 90.0
484 Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2013) 171:469487
without the silver nanoparticles. These results suggest that increased permeability of
membrane is a factor involved in the establishment of the antibacterial property of
tested silver nanoparticles.
Exposure of P. aeruginosa cells to silver nanoparticles caused fast loss of 260 nm
absorbing material and release of potassium ions, these findings assume that the accumula-
tion of silver nanoparticles in the cytoplasm membrane causing loss of their integrity and
become increasingly permeable to protons and ions. Marked leakage of cytoplasm material
is used as indicative of gross and irreversible damage of cytoplasm membrane and plasma
membrane [41]. Moreover, the observation that the amount of loss of 260 nm absorbing
material was as extensive as the leakage of potassium ions might indicate that the membrane
structural damage sustained by P. aeruginosa cells resulted in release of macromolecules
constituents.
Fig. 10 Scanning electron microphotography of P. aeruginosa: a normal cells and b cells after treatment with
silver nanoparticles
In order to achieve an understanding of this effect, knowledge about the structure of bacteria is
needed. Morphology and structure of normal P. aeruginosa cells and treated by silver
nanoparticles for 18 h were observed using scan electron microscope. After treatments with
silver nanoparticles, structural changes in the morphology of bacteria were clearly observed in
the scanning electron micrographs as the surfaces of the cells were damaged (Fig. 10a and b).
These results are in concurrence with the earlier antibacterial studies carried out with silver
nanoparticles [41, 45]. In addition, these findings were further supported by transmission
electron micrographs. The TEM images given in Fig. 11a and b reveal that these nanoparticles
were attached to the surface of bacterial cell wall, permeated the cell membrane, and entered
into the cell interior. As a result, silver nanoparticles interact with the cell wall and membrane,
damage the cell membrane, increase the cell permeability, and leak the intracellular contents by
cell disruption. These observations confirm the earlier findings on the antibacterial mechanism
of silver nanoparticles [9, 10, 41, 46].
Fig. 11 Morphology and structure of bacterial cells under transmission electron microscopy: a normal P.
aeruginosa cells and b cells treated by silver nanoparticles
486 Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2013) 171:469487
Chen et al. [47] reported that the observation with TEM suggested that S-T-gel may
destroy the structure of bacterial cell membranes in order to enter the bacterial cell. S-T-gel
then condensed DNA and combined and coagulated with the cytoplasm of the damaged
bacteria, resulting in the leakage of the cytoplasmic component and the eventual death of
bacteria.
Conclusion
Our current study demonstrates the possible preparation of silver nanoparticles of different
sizes and morphologies using different irradiation doses. The degree of cross-links due to the
different irradiation doses appears to be the key factor in regulating the size of silver
nanoparticles. The prepared silver nanoparticles were evaluated using UV-Vis, XRD anal-
ysis, and DLS confirmed that the silver nanoparticles were formed in a nanoscale according
to the irradiation dose. TEM images showed that the silver nanoparticles are distributed in
the polymeric materials. The silver nanoparticles synthesized by gamma irradiation are
showing promising antibacterial activity on P. aeruginosa. These results indicate the poten-
tial of the synthesized nanoparticles towards the development of antibacterial coatings on
different material surfaces for various biomedical and environmental applications. These
formulations can be used for the treatment of drug resistant bacterial infections.
References
25. Panacek, A., Kvitek, L., Prucek, R., Kolar, M., Vecerova, R., Pizurova, N., et al. (2006). The Journal of
Physical Chemistry. B, 110, 1624816253.
26. Belloni, J., Mostafavi, M., Remita, H., Marignier, J. L., & Delcourt, M. O. (1998). New Journal of
Chemistry, 22, 12391256.
27. Karadag, E., Saraydin, D., Sahiner, N., & Gven, O. (2001). Journal of Macromolecular Science Pure
and Applied Chemistry, A,38, 11051121.
28. Bajpai, S. K., & Johnson, S. (2005). Reactive and Functional Polymers, 62, 271283.
29. Gupta, P., Bajpai, M., & Bajpai, S. K. (2008). The Journal of Cotton Science, 12, 280286.
30. Xie, J., Liu, X., & Liang, J. (2007). Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 106, 16061613.
31. Chena, P., Songa, L., Liub, Y., & Fang, Y. (2007). Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 76, 11651168.
32. Murphy, C. J., & Jana, N. R. (2002). Advanced Materials, 14, 8082.
33. Murthy, P. S. K., Mohan, Y. M., Varaprasada, K., Sreedhar, B., & Raju, K. M. (2008). Journal of Colloid
and Interface Science, 318, 217224.
34. Eid, M. (2011). Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers, 21, 297305.
35. Yang, X., Chen, L., Han, B., Yang, X., & Duan, H. (2010). Polymer, 51, 25332539.
36. Eid, M., El-Arnaouty, M. B., Salah, M., Soliman, E. S., & Hegazy, E. A. (2012). Journal of Polymer
Research, 19, 98359844.
37. Rai, M. K., Deshmukh, S. D., Ingle, A. P., & Gade, A. K. (2011). Journal of Applied Microbiology, 112, 841852.
38. Percival, S. L., Bowler, P. G., & Dolman, J. (2007). International Wound Journal, 4, 186191.
39. Elechiguerra, J. L., Burt, J. L., & Morones, J. R. (2005). Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 3, 110.
40. Sharma, H. S., Hussain, S., Schlager, J., Ali, S. F., & Sharma, A. (2010). Acta Neurochirurgica.
Supplementum, 106, 359364.
41. Kora, A. J., & Arunachalam, J. (2011). World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 27, 12091216.
42. Lu, L., Sun, R. W., Chen, R., Hui, C. K., Ho, C. M., Luk, J. M., et al. (2008). Antiviral Therapy, 13, 253262.
43. Yang, W., Shen, C., & Ji, Q. (2009). Nanotechnology, 20, 085102.
44. Li, W. R., Xie, X. B., Shi, Q. S., Zeng, H. Y., Ou-Yang, Y. S., & Chen, Y. B. (2010). Applied Microbiology
and Biotechnology, 85, 11151122.
45. Cho, K. H., Park, J. E., Osaka, T., & Park, S. G. (2005). Electrochimica Acta, 51, 956960.
46. Raffi, M., Hussain, F., Bhatti, T. M., Akhter, J. I., Hameed, A., & Hasan, M. M. (2008). Journal of
Materials Science and Technology, 24, 192196.
47. Chen, M., Yang, Z., Wu, H., Pan, X., Xie, X., & Wu, C. (2011). International Journal of Nanomedicine,
6, 28732877.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
permission.