Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IMECE 200910172
IMECE2009-10172
DETERMINING THE LEWIS FACTOR FOR PLASTIC SPUR GEARS WITH ASYMMETRIC
TEETH.
J.A. Velzquez
Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Faculty. Universidad Veracruzana. Xalapa. Mxico.
**javp521222@hotmail.com
R. Goytisolo
Mechanical Engineering Faculty. University of Cienfuegos.
Cuatro Caminos, CP 59430. Cienfuegos, Cuba.
ragoyti@ucf.edu.cu
Abstract
The basic weakness of plastic spur gear teeth is tooth fracture brought on by the accumulation of stress at the
root of the tooth and by the geometry of the tooth. Tooth width and height play a major role in failure, as does
the Lewis factor, which has a direct effect on the expression to calculate tooth strength. This study describes a
theoretical analysis of a procedure to determine the Lewis factor for asymmetric teeth.
Keywords: Lewis factor, asymmetric profiles, plastic spur gears.
Nomenclature
critmen Critical radius of curvature at the root of
the asymmetric tooth.
afmen Load angle in asymmetric gear tooth.
rmay
Radius of curvature at the root of the
amen Outside angle for asymmetric spur gear drive for
tooth for driving involute profile.
coast side profile.
rmen Radius of curvature at the root of the
tooth for coast involute profile.
cmay
Pressure angle for asymmetric spur gear drive for
driving side profile. y
Inverse shift profile coefficient.
cmen b
Pressure angle for asymmetric spur gear drive for Face width
coast side profile.
C Coefficient of asymmetry.
Fan Load angle in spur and helical gear teeth c Radial clearance.
n d a Outside circle diameter.
Pressure angle for spur and helical gear teeth.
d
Angle at top of the tooth.
bmen Base circle diameter for asymmetric spur
gear drive for coast side profile.
dp
Pitch diameter.
e Eccentricity.
S crit Critical tooth thickness in the asymmetric tooth. t2
can be deduced from the figure that: h = and
S 4 h
critmay
Critical tooth thickness for driving side
3 Pt 2 h
profile. = , where the expression is termed the
S 2 b h 3
critmen Critical tooth thickness for coast side Lewis factor ( y ). Other standards, such as DIN 3990 [16],
profile. calculate the most critical section by extending a line at an
Sp angle of 30 from the tooth axis of symmetry, tangent to
Tooth thickness on pitch diameter. the tooth-root profile in points a-a.
S Fn Tooth thickness at critical section for spur and
3. Determining the Lewis factor for asymmetric gears
helical gear teeth. The authors calculations of the Lewis factor were based
Variable angle to determine Lewis factor. on Figs. 3-4. The stress produced at the root of the tooth
due to flexion can be calculated using the following
W x Section module. expression:
X Shift profile coefficient.
Mf ( )
Pn cos afmen hcrit Pv e
= = (1)
Wx Wx
YF Lewis factor for asymmetric gear teeth.
where:
YFa Lewis factor for spur and helical gear teeth. (
M f = Pn cos afmen hcrit Pn sen afmen e ; )
YFsg b S crit
2
Lewis factor for asymmetric teeth from the regression Wx = ;
equations obtained by the Statgraphics software. 6
Z Pt
Number of teeth. Pn =
cos cmen
1. Introduction then:
Pt 6 (hcrit cos afmen e sen afmen )
The most common failure of well lubricated metallic =
gears is caused by pitting at the flank of the tooth. b 2
S crit cos cmen
Volumetric fatigue is of secondary importance. However,
the most frequent failure in plastic spur gears teeth is tooth Multiplying and dividing by the module:
2 cos cmen
YF = m Table 2 provides a comparison of Lewis Factor values
(3)
hcrit cos afmen e sen afmen for asymmetric teeth calculated using the algorithm
6 developed by author and the regression equations from the
m m Statgraphics software.
then the expression (2) can be rewritten as follows:
4 Conclusions
Pt
= (4)
New expressions for calculating the Lewis Factor are
b m YF obtained. The principal failures and the calculation
methods are analyzed and compared with the Finite
YF is the Lewis Factor for asymmetric gear teeth. Elements Method. The limitations of present calculation
Observe the difference between the expression (3) and expressions and new coefficients and formulas for the
the expression (5) for symmetric gear teeth [16]: particular case of asymmetric gears are offered. All
information was obtained by employing the most advanced
methods of graphic design, geometric modeling and
S Fn
2
2 cos Fan
simulation. The positive influence of asymmetric profiles
combined with tooth profile modification on the bending
=
m
YFa (5) strength of teeth is demonstrated.
hFa cos n
6
m References
[1] K. Cavdar, F. Karpat, F.C. Babalik, Computer aided
After considering the DIN 3990 Standard [16], the analysis of bending strength of involute spur gears
algorithm proposed by Gonzlez [17], and the with asymmetric profile Journal of Mechanical Design
characteristics of asymmetric teeth, the authors propose the 127 (3) (2005) 477-484.
algorithm in Fig. 5 to calculate YF . The concept of the [2] W. Lewis, Investigation of strength of gear teeth,
Proceedings of Engineers Club, Philadelphia, P.A.
asymmetry coefficient was incorporated to cater for
(1892) 16-23.
asymmetry. It is the relation between the driving side
[3] E. Buckingham, Manual of gear design. Editorial
cmay Industrial Press Inc., New York, 1971.
profile and the coast side profile angles: C = . Fig.
cmen [4] D.W. Dudley, Gear Handbook: Design, Manufacture
and Application of Gears, Editorial Continental, S.A.,
6 illustrates how the Lewis Factor varies for different Mxico, 1980 (in Spanish).
numbers of teeth and asymmetry coefficients, and its [5] G. Henriot, Trait Thorique et Pratique des
differing values are described in Table 1. Engrenajes, Villars, Paris, 1991 (in French).
Using Statgraphics software, the authors found the [6] V. N. Kudriatzev, Design Machine Elements,
regression equations to obtain the values of the Lewis Mashinostroienie, Leningrad, 1980 (in Russian).
Factor for asymmetric teeth depending on the number of [7] F. L. Litvin, Gear Theory, Nauka, Moscow, 1968 (in
teeth and the asymmetry coefficients. Three expressions Russian).
were established considering the range of number of teeth [8] H. Merrit, Gear Engineering, Pitman Publishing,
so that values were precisely calculated: England, 1990.
For 10 Z 35 (with 98,9% reliability level and [9] D. Reshetov, Machine Elements, La Habana, Pueblo y
absolute error of 0,0053) Educacin, 1985 (in Spanish).
YFsg = -0,0315949 + 0,0269414 Z + 0,405287 C - [10] M. F. Spotts, T. E. Shoup, Mechanical Design,
McGraw-Hill, New York, 1999.
0,000462649 Z - 0,103118 C
2 2
[11] K. Zirpke, Zahnrader, Veb Fachbuch Verlag, Leipzig
1980 (in German).
[12] A. L. Kapelevich, Geometry and Design of Involute
Spur Gears with Asymmetric Teeth, Mechanism and
Machine Theory 35 (2000) 117130.
Start
1
2G
1 = tan H
= /6 Z
2G
1 = tan H No
Z ( - 0.001 =
Yes
No
( - 0.001 =
=
Yes
S critmay G rmay
= = Z sen + 3
m 3 cos m
S critmen G
= Z sen + 3 rmen e S critmay S critmen
m 3 cos m =
Critical radius hcrit m 2m 2m
critmen rmen 2G 2
= +
m m (
cos Z cos 2 2G ) S critmay S critmen
2
d bmen 2m + 2m cos cmen
amen = cos 1 , afmen = amen
YF =
da hcrit e
cos afmen sen afmen
d bmen (
= d p cos cmen , d a = m Z + 2ha + 2 X 2 y ) 6
m m
0,5 + 2 X tan amen
= + inv cmen inv amen
Z
hcrit cos cmen G End
= 0,5Z cos + 0,5 men
m cos amen 3 m cos
Values of Lewis factor according to the number of teeth Z and the coefficients of asymmetry C
C
Z=10 Z=12 Z=15 Z=20 Z=30 Z=40 Z=50 Z=60 Z=70 Z=80 Z=90 Z=100
1,00 0,201 0,245 0,289 0,320 0,358 0,389 0,408 0,421 0,429 0,429 0,442 0,446
1,05 0,228 0,267 0,308 0,351 0,392 0,396 0,415 0,435 0,437 0,438 0,450 0,454
1,10 0,232 0,272 0,314 0,354 0,399 0,403 0,422 0,442 0,444 0,445 0,458 0,462
1,15 0,242 0,277 0,320 0,358 0,406 0,410 0,430 0,450 0,452 0,453 0,466 0,470
1,20 0,237 0,282 0,326 0,371 0,413 0,417 0,438 0,458 0,460 0,461 0,474 0,478
1,25 0,247 0,288 0,332 0,378 0,421 0,424 0,446 0,466 0,468 0,469 0,482 0,487
1,30 0,252 0,294 0,339 0,385 0,429 0,432 0,454 0,475 0,477 0,478 0,490 0,496
1,35 0,257 0,300 0,345 0,392 0,437 0,440 0,463 0,483 0,486 0,487 0,498 0,505
1,40 0,263 0,306 0,352 0,400 0,445 0,448 0,472 0,492 0,495 0,496 0,510 0,515
1,45 0,268 0,312 0,359 0,408 0,454 0,457 0,481 0,502 0,504 0,505 0,520 0,525
1,50 0,274 0,319 0,366 0,416 0,463 0,466 0,491 0,512 0,514 0,515 0,530 0,535
Table 2 Comparison of Lewis Factor values for asymmetric teeth calculated using the algorithm developed by
author and the regression equations from the Statgraphics software
C =1,50
C =1,00
C =1,35
C =1,50
C =1,00
C =1,35
C =1,50
C =1,00
C =1,35
C =1,50
C =1,00
YF 0,358 0,437 0,463 0,389 0,446 0,471 0,408 0,463 0,491 0,442 0,498 0,530
YFsg 0,378 0,435 0,451 0,370 0,427 0,454 0,406 0,463 0,491 0,445 0,503 0,532