Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction:
Literature suggests that the topics of length, area and volume prove to be particularly challenging for children to understand (Chappell &
Thompson, 1999: Martin & Strutchens, 2000: Robinson, Mahaffey & Nelson, 1975 cited in Tas Sisman & Aksu, 2015), yet they are crucial as
they help students to better understand their world around them (Oberdorf & Taylor-Cox, 1999). Furthermore, understanding of key
measurement and geometric areas is also important as it links to other key areas of mathematics and helps students make connections
between their learning (Oberdorf & Taylor-Cox, 1999). Like any learning area, mathematics facilitates the opportunity for errors and
misconceptions to arise (Gough, 2008; Mohyuddin & Khalil, 2016; Tan Sisman & Aksu, 2015). Given the fact that misconceptions are often hard
to break due to the connectedness that students feel with their idea or rule that they have created (Mohyuddin & Khalil, 2016), it is important
as a teacher that we are aware of the types of misconceptions, how they are caused and how they can be rectified (Tan Sisman & Aksu, 2015)
because if not rectified, misconceptions can hinder future learning in other areas (Gough, 2008; Mohyuddin & Khalil, 2016). Interviews such as
these are a great way to probe student understanding and to weed out possible gaps in learning, which can then influence future planning
1
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
(Reys et al., 2012). It is important to understand the difference between an error and a misconception, as errors can be caused by a number of
different things including misconceptions (Mohyuddin & Khalil, 2016; Tan Sisman & Aksu, 2015). Misconceptions can be described as a
perceived pattern or generalization, which often results in a congruent pattern of mistakes (Mohyuddin & Khalil, 2016; Tan Sisman & Aksu,
2015). Three primary aged students were interviewed in this report about their understanding of perimeter and area. Due to the closed
question nature of this interview (Reys et al., 2012), I modified the interview to become more open, by asking the students to explain why they
had chosen their answer and also recording any observable behaviour that may indicate what they were thinking. This offered more insight as
to what they understand about perimeter and area, and also ruled out whether they had a lucky guess at choosing the right answer (Reys et
al., 2012). With the relevant literature and data from the interviews combined, I have also considered two possible tasks that would be useful
Student A:
Age: 11
Gender: Female
Year Level: 5
QUESTION ANSWER JUSTIFICATION OBSERVATIONS
1A R and S have equal area It is the same shape, just in a Very quick to respond that they
different way are the same before I could
Correct finish answering the question
2
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
1B S has the bigger perimeter The outline is bigger on this one Traced the outline of each shape
(Shape S) than that one (Shape with their finger and their eyes
Correct R)
1C R and S have equal card to paint Because they are the same Again, very quick to respond that
shapes. This bit is the same as they are the same. Indicates a
Correct this. This one is the same to this connection between the idea of
and those are the same (pointing area and the idea of painting the
to corresponding shapes) area of both shapes
1D It is further around the outside Because of the outlines. This Traced one shape and then
of S shape is bigger realised it was the same as 1B
Correct
2A P has the bigger area Because there are more pins Counted the pins while nodding
inside it (Shape P) head and tapping finger.
Correct
Thought that there was nothing
inside of Shape Q because there
were no pins inside it
2B P has the bigger perimeter This shape (Q) is longer, but it is Hesitated with this question. The
smaller than that one (P). That large difference in area is
Incorrect one (P) has a bigger outline interfering with focusing on just
the perimeter. It is evident that
the child believes that P has a
bigger perimeter because it is a
bigger shape
2C P has more space inside it Because I counted the pins Counted pins, rather than
estimating by visual comparison
Correct
2D It is further around the outside Because P is bigger Was quick to respond based on
of P previous experience with
question 2B
3
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
Incorrect
Analysis of Student A:
Student A demonstrates a conceptual understanding (Tan Sisman & Aksu, 2015) of both area and perimeter in isolation (i.e. Area is the
amount of surface enclosed within a shape and perimeter is the distance around a shape (Reys et al., 2012)), however some confusion is
present when looking at the relationship between the two attributes and the impact that changing one attribute has on the other. Student A
knows that the area of a shape remains the same if the shape is cut into sub-parts and rearranged to form a new shape (i.e. Changing the
perimeter of the shape). This is evident in question 1A, where Student A stated that R and S have equal area because its the same shape just
in a different way. Student A also recognises that whilst the area did not change, the perimeter became greater when transformed into Shape
S because the outlines [of Shape S] is bigger [than Shape R]. When manipulating the idea of area as being a surface covering in the context of
paint, Student A further demonstrates an understanding of area, correctly justifying why the same amount of paint would be needed to cover
both cards.
Whilst Student A demonstrates an understanding that shapes can have the same area and different perimeters, some more exposure to
shapes with the same perimeter and different areas would be beneficial. When comparing the perimeter of the shapes in question 2, Student
A demonstrated a common misconception that if the area of the shape is bigger, then the perimeter must also be bigger. This of course is not
4
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
the case as we can see in question 2 that the areas are distinctly different, however the perimeters are exactly the same. This misconception is
similar to that described by Gough (2008) where students believe that the area enclosed within a loop of string is always the same because the
Another perceived misconception that Student A demonstrated was that the number of pins tells you how big the perimeter is, rather than
considering the spaces in between the pins as one unit and this is congruent with Tan Sisman & Aksus (2015) research. This means that
Student A believes that the perimeter of Shape R is 21cm, when in fact the actual perimeter is 20cm. This also links to common misconceptions
in measurement when children include the starting point on a ruler as 1 rather than 0.
Student B:
Age: 12
Gender: Female
Year Level: 6
5
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
Correct
2A P and Q have equal area The string fits around both Possible misconception: same
perimeter means the same area
Incorrect
2B P and Q have equal perimeter The inside is thinner, but the Confident to answer promptly
outside is the same
Correct
2C P has more space inside it Theres more pins inside it (P) Counted pins. Possible lack of
connection between the idea of
Correct area and space being used
interchangeably
2D It is further around the outside Because there is more space Very confident to respond to this
of P one. Possible misunderstanding
that more area means more
Incorrect perimeter
Analysis of Student B:
Similar to Student A, Student B demonstrates a conceptual understanding (Tan Sisman & Aksu, 2015) of both area and perimeter in isolation,
6
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
however some confusion is present when looking at the relationship between the two attributes and the impact that changing one attribute
has on the other. Student B demonstrates an understanding that shapes can have the same area with varying perimeters and this is evident in
both the answers and justifications for all of question 1. Student B can use the visual aids such as matching each corresponding coloured piece
of card in question 1 or using the pins in the geoboard in question 2 to double check and argue why the area is either the same or different.
Some confusion is present when comparing two shapes which have the same perimeter. A possible misconception highlighted by Student B
was that the area of both P and Q were the same because the string fits around both (i.e. They both have the same perimeter), which is
again congruent with the misconception described by Gough (2008). Another possible misconception highlighted by Student B when
comparing two shapes was assuming that the perimeter of a shape must be bigger if the area of the shape is bigger than the other shape in
question and this is evident in both the response and reasoning behind question 2D.
Student B also demonstrates the misconception that counting the number of pins in the geoboard will indicate the perimeter of the shape,
rather than considering one unit as the distance between 2 pins, which is again consistent with the research by Tan Sisman & Aksu, 2015).
Student B would benefit from more exposure to learning experiences with investigating shapes that have the same perimeter, as well as
investigating shapes in varying forms (geoboards, concrete materials, drawing shapes on grid paper etc.). Activities using informal units such as
7
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
Student C:
Age: 11
Gender: Male
Year Level: 5
QUESTION ANSWER JUSTIFICATION OBSERVATIONS
1A You cannot tell if one area is You cant turn it to match it Visually compared each part of
bigger or not the shape to one another. I think
Wait, they are the same the fact that the pink triangle
Incorrect was flipped and he couldnt
Self-corrected to R and S have visually place it on top of the
equal area other shape as it was caused him
to think You cannot tell
8
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
Analysis of Student C:
9
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
Similar to Students A and B, Student C understands that shapes can have the same area, but vary in the size of their perimeter. This is evident
when Student A distinguished that both shapes R and S have the same area and require the same amount of paint to cover with their
justification lying in the fact that they are made up of the same sized parts. The misconception that the shape with the larger area means that
it also has a larger perimeter hindered Student C from recognising that both shapes have the same perimeter, as was demonstrated by the
piece of string at the beginning of question 2. Student C can correctly argue that a shape has a larger area due to either having more pins
inside it or because there is more space or surface (Reys et al., 2012). Furthermore, Student C can recognise that the perimeter is the
Student C would benefit from more exposure of examples of shapes where the perimeter remains the same, however the area changes.
Activities such as this would help Student C to understand why the examples in question 2 have the same perimeter, despite one shape looking
Task 3: Report of some aspects of research literature related to student understanding and relevant tasks to the teaching of area
and/or perimeter:
As stated previously, geometry is both an important and often difficult concept to learn (Chappell & Thompson, 1999: Martin & Strutchens,
2000; Robinson, Mahaffey & Nelson, 1975 cited in Tas Sisman & Aksu, 2015), however overall, children tend to gain a lot of enjoyment out of
10
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
studying the topic due to their intrigue with shapes and patterns (Oberdorf & Taylor- Cox, 1999). Understanding measurement and geometry is
important as it enables children to connect their learning with the real world (Oberdorf & Taylor- Cox, 1999), but also because it is the
foundation to other related maths topics (Tan Sisman & Aksu, 2015) such as volume, angles etc. Literature suggests that a superficial
understanding of key measurement areas such as area, perimeter and volume remains prevalent amongst upper primary aged students and
this is due to teaching being focused on finding the product, rather than focusing on the procedure and understanding what it is that the
Given the impact that understanding measurement and geometry has on the progression of learning, it is therefore important that we as
teachers are providing effective, quality teaching (Mohyuddin & Khalil, 2016). This means knowing the related mathematics concepts
ourselves, knowing how students learn the topics (Mohyuddin & Khalil, 2016), being aware of common misconceptions that can arise, their
causes and how to rectify and prevent them in the future (Tan Sisman & Aksu, 2015). Not all errors are caused by misconceptions, however
misconceptions generally lead to a pattern of errors and can create further misconceptions (Mohyuddin & Khalil, 2016; Tan Sisman & Aksu,
2015) and hindering on future learning. It is important to understand the underlying cause of student errors before taking any action to rectify
11
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
Some common misconceptions in relation to area and perimeter include believing that: the area is always bigger than the perimeter because
you have to multiply rather than add (Gough, 2008); the area contained within a loop of string is always the same because the length of the
string remains unchanged (Gough, 2008); the area is always length multiplied by width (Gough, 2008); for one area of a rectangle, there will
only be one possible perimeter i.e. When the area is 50cm^2, the perimeter will always be 30cm (Gough, 2008); the perimeter stays the same
when the shape is manipulated into a new shape (Tan Sisman & Aksu, 2015); if the shape has a bigger area than another, then the perimeter is
also bigger than the other; the area and the perimeter are the same for each shape (Tan Sisman & Aksu, 2015). As you can see, children who
exhibit any one of these experiences are likely to encounter some difficulties when completing tasks associated with area and perimeter.
The above misconceptions are very common and if not rectified can impact on future learning in a negative way (Gough, 2008; Tan Sisman &
Aksu, 2015). It is therefore important that students have a solid understanding of the properties and relationships between shapes (Oberdorf
& Taylor- Cox, 1999), as well as understanding what partitioning and iterating is before investigating area and perimeter (Tan Sisman & Aksu,
2015). Furthermore, tasks that involve using and understanding arrays and grid structures assists in understanding area and perimeter (Tan
Sisman & Aksu, 2015). It is important to expose our students to tasks which teach the students what attribute they are investigating, why they
are investigating it, and what it means (Tan Sisman & Aksu, 2015), rather than simply finding the area or the perimeter of a shape. Moreover,
students must learn how the attribute stands alone as well as the relationship that one attribute has with another (Reys et al., 2012). These
12
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
strategies will work towards students developing a more meaningful understanding of measurement that can be related to other areas in
mathematics in more sophisticated ways. The following two tasks are examples from Reys et al. (2012) that could be used in the classroom to
13
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
This task relates to question 2 in the interview, which focuses on shapes that have the same perimeter, but different areas. All 3 students
would benefit from this task to address the misconception that a bigger area means that it also has a bigger perimeter. In the duration of this
task students will encounter examples similar to that in question 2 where the shapes are distinctly difference in visual size in relation to area,
however they are the equal in terms of perimeter. This task will help students to develop the relationship between the two attributes, but also
to understand that area and perimeter are not dependent on one another (Reys et al., 2012). Furthermore, this activity will help student to
understand what perimeter and area actually means as a concept, rather than simply performing an algorithm to find the product.
Relevant Task 2: Introducing the idea of finding the area using a formula
14
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
This task would be appropriate for all 3 students from the interview because they showed a solid understanding of the attribute of area in
isolation from perimeter, so this would further extend their understanding of area. This activity could help to rectify the misconceptions found
15
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
in relation to a single unit explained in the student analyses and could be extended by introducing the idea of perimeter later on. This task
enables students to understand area beyond finding the product obtained by multiplying the length by the width, because students need to
follow the steps which break down what the formula actually represents and thus a better understanding of the process can be obtained from
this task.
16
EDMA412Rachel Paraman S00118748Tutor: Jill Brown
References:
Gough, J. (2008). Diversions: Fixing misconceptions: Length, area and volume. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 64(2), 34-35.
Mohyuddin, R. r., & Khalil, U. (2016). Misconceptions of Students in Learning Mathematics at Primary Level. Bulletin of Education & Research,
38(1), 133-162.
Oberdorf, C. D., & Taylor-Cox, J. (1999). Shape up! Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 340. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy1.acu.edu.au/docview/214139140?accountid=8194
Reys, R. E., Lindquist, L. M., Lambdin, D. V., Smith, N. L., Rogers, A., Falle, J.Bennett, S. (2012). Helping Children Learn Mathematics (1st
Tan Sisman, G., & Aksu, M. (2015). A Study on Sixth Grade Students Misconceptions and Errors in Spatial Measurement: Length, Area, and
17