Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Johnathan Lin
2/10/17
Abstract
Plastic pollution in oceans has become a major issue in the last couple of hundreds of
years that needs to be addressed due to its negative worldwide impact. In these years, it has
destruction, and the promotion of invasive species. Currently, five Southeastern countries (China,
Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, and the Philippines) produce 50-60% of the worlds plastic
pollution in oceans. This astonishing number is caused by the rapid industrialization of these
countries, skyrocketing population, high plastic usage, proximity to the coast, under equipped
waste management systems, wasteful consumer culture, and lack of reusability of plastics. In this
research, interviews, online research, and surveys were conducted to learn more about the topic.
This research brought light to many solutions for the issue, including improving waste
management facilities, reducing plastic use, and incentivizing populations to take action by
organizing more community events. Improving waste management facilities would be beneficial
because more manpower, technology, and enclosing landfills translates to efficient collection
service more suited for the increasing plastic waste and less stray plastic debris. Reducing plastic
use would be a key solution to this problem; if consumers were to switch to alternatives instead
of plastic, there would less plastic usage, waste, and production. Not to mention, there would
also be indirect benefits in air quality, energy usage, and landfill space. Lastly, by encouraging
action, there will be more environmental conscience which would encourage solutions to be
done. To conclude the research, an informational piece, such as a brochure, video, or pamphlet
will be made to raise awareness for the issue and incentivize environmental action.
Lin 1
Introduction
Many seafood cuisines all around the world are secretly seasoned with a special
ingredient: plastic. When it comes to pollution, people often neglect where most of the pollution
goes: the ocean. Pollution has changed in shape, size, material, and quantity since the 1800s (A
Brief History of Pollution.). During many developmental periods (Ex: Industrial Revolution),
the drastic increase in population along with higher use of modern materials has led to increased
Revolution of America, the environment was one of the least concerns among many: rivers
became polluted, disease was rampant, air became covered with smog, city streets were flooded
with filth, and drifting, synthetic waste was everywhere. In recent years, plastic has been one of
the most common waste materials around the world. Eight million tons of plastic pollution is
being annually dumped into oceans, where the waste will stick around for thousands of years to
come (Ocean Pollution). Many believe that developed countries are the ones to blame, but the
real culprits to the plastic pollution are developing countries, specifically the Southeast Asian
countries with large populations (Winn, 5 countries dump). Five developing Asian countries,
China, Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines, contribute to 50-60% of the plastic
pollution in the entire world. This drastic number stems from many issues including,
industrialization, consumer culture, underwhelming waste management, and high plastic usage.
For these reasons, improved recycling programs, less plastic usage, and more emphasis on ocean
pollution will drastically reduce ocean pollution in these countries and its environmental impact.
This paper will educate the reader about mainly plastic pollution and its detrimental
environmental effects, explain why these five developing Asian countries contribute to such a
Lin 2
drastic amount of plastic pollution in oceans, and propose possible solutions that can reduce
Review of Literature
Plastic pollution as well as many other types of ocean pollution has detrimental effects to
the health of ecosystems; they disrupt the biological balances that keep the ecosystems in healthy
shape. The first, direct impact of this plastic and ocean pollution is resource contamination.
Plastics as well as other pollutants can contaminate water supplies and food chains in marine
ecosystems (Lonne, How Does Ocean). It can also bio accumulate in both living organisms
and the environment due to their high persistence; plastics take thousands of years to decompose
(Ocean Pollution). This means that these pollutants continually ravage marine animals for long
periods of time (Rinkesh, What is Ocean). Although biological communities are resilient to
an extent, they still have been vastly affected in their everyday lives. Plastic pollution as well as
many other types of ocean pollution can cause illness, hormonal, or digestion problems. Rashes,
stomach aches, and diarrhea are just some of the possible symptoms of exposure from just plastic
(Lonne, How does Ocean). To add to that, plastic debris can injure or cause death for many
(The Problem of Marine). With debris, such as plastics, Styrofoam, aluminum, and foam,
along with contaminants, such as oil, phosphates, lead, mercury, it is no wonder that ecosystem
Excess nutrients, mainly fertilizers, and plastic waste that flow into bodies of water
and/or the ocean end up creating dead zones due to algae blooms. Algae blooms are rapid
overgrowths of algae; they are detrimental to marine ecosystems because they both become
dense and block out sunlight for underwater plant species. Plastic waste also blocks out sunlight
Lin 3
for underwater species and can serve as a platform for algae to grow (Rinkesh, What is
Ocean). Along with the barrier that plastic and algae create, they both can use extremely high
amounts of available oxygen in the water. Algae require oxygen for respiration, whereas plastic
waste requires oxygen in order to decompose (Rinkesh, What is Ocean). In large quantities,
both plastic and algae can create these catastrophic results. When other organisms are deprived
of sunlight and/or oxygen, they must migrate to different places in order to survive, which can
create dead zones (Ocean Pollution). These dead zones remain for thousands if not millions
of years, because the restoration processes that these areas undergo are very slow and fragile;
many ecosystems do not have adequate organisms or biological processes to decompose these
foreign, synthetic materials and get rid of algae invasions. If humans do not allow these natural
processes to restore these zones, then these areas could be abandoned forever.
Ecosystems can also be destroyed in other various ways, including by invasive species.
Invasive species are creatures that cannot be controlled by the ecosystem of a habitat because
they are foreign; species often become invasive after they are transported to foreign ecosystems
as a result of human activity. What makes this so problematic is that there are usually no
biological controls, such as predators or climate conditions, to prevent the species from surviving
and reproducing at high success. This means that the populations of invasive species can get out
of hand and result in resource depletion and eventually ecosystem destruction. As waste debris
floats around, they can become habitats for organisms that cling onto surfaces to survive, such as
barnacles and mussels. Plastic debris often plays a key role in providing a living surface for these
species. These situations can lead to disaster when ocean currents transport the floating/mobile
ocean debris to new areas. If this occurs, organisms have the potential to become invasive and
destructive in their new, foreign habitats (The Problem of Marine). Once an invasive species
Lin 4
forms, it becomes terribly difficult to control unless the ecosystem falls along with their
populations.
At first glance, these five Southeastern countries magically seem to produce a vast
amount of plastic pollution considering how small they appear. How could such a small region of
the world produce more than half of the plastic pollution in the oceans today? Well, there are
several reasons for why these countries can make so much pollution. The primary cause for their
high contributions is that each country is going through industrialization periods. This means that
all five of these countries are experiencing accelerated economic growth as more and more
people emerge from poverty, improve their living standards, and start to consume more modern
materials in their improved lives (Indonesias Plastic). Combined with the rapid population
growth and the high population density for each country, it becomes clear why these countries
Consumer-culture in the modern world is not helping either. In many stores of either
developing or developed countries, plastic bags are among the most popular choice for
consumers. Once they are used, they are thrown away into garbage bins or find their ways onto
sidewalks and streets (Vi, Plastic bag). Their convenience and cheap, or at many times free,
cost makes them very appealing to shoppers. Also, many consumer products contain plastic
packaging to seal, protect, or showcase products (Vi, Plastic bag). Companies from all over
the world like to put their products in plastic packaging is for one main reason: its cheap.
Companies will always opt for the cheapest production costs, and if that means using plastic,
then they will use plastic. Plastic is so common and accessible around the world that it would be
unusual if it wasnt used in consumer products and stores. However, the accessibility of plastic is
experienced accelerated growth like the economy and the population. Most of these countries do
not have technological waste facilities, but rather communal dumps which are basically large
piles of trash (Winn, 5 countries dump). Exposed to the wind and elements, stray items are
easily swept away into rivers and lands where they will eventually end up in the nearby ocean
(Winn, 5 countries dump). To make matters worse, many garbage men who collect
community trash often cut corners by dumping trash at the side of a river in order to reduce
operation costs (Winn, 5 countries dump). They also tend to skip rural areas, which means
that a huge portion of the waste being produced isnt even being collected at all (Winn, 5
countries dump). On a brighter note, there are garbage pickers who collect trash for money.
These people are currently the only ones who actually recycle trash in these countries by
foraging for recyclables in both rivers and landfills and selling their collected items to recycling
companies. However, the flaw with these pickers is that they tend to solely collect high value
items, such as plastic bottles, and neglect non-valuable ones such as plastic bags (Winn, 5
countries dump). Plastic bottles are valued much more than plastic bags because recycling
companies in these countries are willing to pay much more for bottles. An average trash
collector, who works ten hours a day, can make $3.70 a day if he/she collects plastic bottles
rather than collecting plastic bags which would only fetch a measly 50 (Winn, 5 countries
dump). This means that a high amount of the plastic waste still becomes destined to reach the
ocean, causing havoc on the oceans and ecosystems that depend on it.
This leads to the next issue: there are no feasible solutions to utilize plastic pollution.
Plastics come in a variety of forms, differing in rigidity, reusability, and chemistry. Thermoset
plastics, which are commonly used in consumer products, are non-reusable and cannot be re-
Lin 6
molded again. There are other plastics that can be reused, but many can only be reused around
two to three times before the materials become completely useless (How plastic is made).
Another issue with plastic is that although it can be remolded, it cannot be reused for its original
purpose; the recycled plastic often has to be used for other limited applications such as water
pipes or fences. New plastic must be produced in order to make popular plastic items such as
plastic bags, bottles, and containers (How plastic is made). Many of the newly proposed
methods, solutions, and uses for plastic require modification and tinkering before they actually
become mainstream; these solutions and methods are often productively or economically
waste management, and little reusability of plastic make this problem seem to be a daunting task.
Despite the odds, there are many possible solutions to the situation before it escalates.
First and foremost, consumers should be responsible and use less plastic by any means possible.
Reusable alternatives such as glass and tin cans could be used in place for beverages in plastic
bottles. Food containers could use wood, bamboo, glass, or stainless steel to substitute for
plastic. Biodegradable materials also exist. For example, there are soda rings made of barley and
wheat, bamboo bags or tote bags of various materials that could replace plastic bags, and wooden
or bamboo utensils to replace plastic ones; the sky is the limit for solutions to the problem. By
introducing and popularizing these alternatives, there will be less plastic use and production
overall, which leads to less potential stray plastic ending up in bodies of water.
Garbage facilities also need to upgrade their systems and improve their workforces in
order to prevent this. Many of these waste facilities lack the manpower that is needed to manage
all this waste, which can easily be changed if the companies hire more people. More people
means more areas can provide waste collection services, and the efficiency of operation could be
Lin 7
improved with a larger workforce. Another suggested fix that these facilities should consider is
enclosing their trash piles. Not only will this stop stray plastic from heading to rivers and oceans,
but this will also stop wildlife, such as birds and foxes, from ingesting the harmful waste in these
areas. To clear or clean up landfills, waste facilities should utilize the trash rather than simply
piling and burning trash in these facilities. Although there are some facilities that burn trash in
order to produce energy, it comes at the cost of lowering air quality. Burning plastic waste is a
horrible solution due to the plethora of extremely harmful pollutants and chemicals that are
released into the atmosphere during burning processes (Eisenstark, Chinas). This also leads
to other environmental concerns, such as air quality, acid rain, and ocean acidification which are
all terrible prices to pay for burning trash. Unpopular uses for trash should be pushed for as well,
Although this does not clear landfill space, it conserves fossil fuels and makes use of an already-
abundant source that humans have. Next generations will not have a safe environment to live in
if environmental practices such as these continue to occur. After all, consumers are the one who
make choices to use these materials and create the pollution that plagues the oceans.
One of the best, yet overlooked methods to solving this problem is to educate students or
even possibly adults about ocean pollution. Many people simply lack the education or awareness
to realize how plastic pollution as well as other types of pollution affects their environment, or
they often choose convenience over environmental impact just because they see no immediate
effect (Indonesias plastic). By teaching and emphasizing the students or adults about this
content, next generations will become more aware, responsible, and environmentally-conscious
throughout their lives. With more awareness, many more new ideas and solutions will emerge
from individuals. Also, these new ideas and solutions will have much a much higher chance to
Lin 8
become mainstream because the population would be very supportive to increase the popularity
of these propositions. It is vital that these students receive this education and content. Soon, they
will all be fully responsible of taking care of the environment and ensuring that other future
Although the environment has already been damaged, there is still time to change things
around for the better. Less plastic usage, improved waste collection facilities, and more emphasis
about the severity of ocean pollution are only three of the countless number of solutions that we
can put in action. Not only will reducing plastic use lower plastic waste, but it will also help to
save space in landfills, save energy from producing less plastic, and improve the quality of air
that could have been tainted by the fumes of burning or decomposing plastic. Improved waste
collection facilities would be able to keep the pollution problem under control with more
manpower, technology, and efficiency. It will cost more money to improve the technology in
these facilities and obtain more manpower, but the environmental benefits, such as clean water
and oxygen, will be definitely worth it. By educating the importance of ocean conservation to
children and adults, more people will be called to action and possibly produce invaluable
inventions in the future that could save the environment in desperate times. Many more new
solutions will be made in order to combat this issue day by day, but they will only combat these
issues rather than stop the source of all of this pollution. Every individual is to blame for the
environmental consequences that are being currently observed. Ecosystems are falling apart,
seafood and water is becoming more contaminated, people and organisms are getting sick,
animals are becoming extinct day by day; the list goes on. How much is enough for people to
realize that what we are doing now will soon become irreversible? Will people only realize what
they should have done when everything is already gone? If the current population does not
Lin 9
change how they use resources, change their practices, or care more for the environment, then
there is little hope for improvement this dire problem and the survival of humanity. Humans have
taken so much from the environment and have abused it so much in the last couple of hundred
years. Its time to give back, repair, conserve, and respect the environment for what it has done
for us. The environment can be saved if a collective effort is present, and if people all over the
world started now, the world would be a much cleaner, healthier, and happier place for every
Both the research question, Why does China, Vietnam, Philippines, Thailand, and
Indonesia produce 50-60% of the worlds plastic pollution in the ocean and what methods are
available to solve this problem?, and my hypothesis, Overpopulation and the massive use of
plastic are the reasons for the rampant plastic pollution. Improved recycling programs, less
plastic usage, and more education will drastically reduce the amount of plastic pollution that
these countries contribute., were both questions that were investigated through interviews,
surveys, observations, and analysis. Several online articles and resources were analyzed in order
to give the researcher a broad view of the situation and suggest possible causes for the problem.
Also, an interview with an international news reporter for Public Radio International (PRI),
Patrick Winn, was interviewed in order to give a first-hand experience and advice on many key
causes to the issue and possible solutions for the issue. He was a good interviewee because he
was a reporter who lived in Thailand and has traveled all around Southeast Asia. This meant that
For data collection, the researcher chose to conduct a survey (see Appendix A) in order to
look into personal/individual viewpoints of plastic pollution. The survey was vital because it
Lin 10
allowed for investigation of the general population, which is the group responsible for the use
and waste disposal of plastic products. Throughout my previous research before data collection, I
only investigated third-person viewpoints through online research, with exception to the
interview. However, the interview and the questions (see Appendix B) only gave insight on one
individuals personal thoughts, which was insufficient in gauging the common beliefs and
practices of populations. Although the survey participants were not in Southeast Asia but rather
the U.S., the results were still valuable because many of these Southeast Asian countries model
their consumer culture and waste management practices after Western standards. Both regions
have many similar products available to consumers including soda rings, plastic bags, and
disposable plastic bottles. The 51 participants in this survey were mainly Environmental Science
students, Earth Science students, and Independent Research G/T students. The science students
were selected because of their likelihood to care for the environment (taking environmental
classes), and Independent Research G/T students were selected in order to include a more
random population (possible less environmental bias). The students, mainly sophomores, juniors,
and seniors at Mt. Hebron, were given a link to fill out a survey on Google Forms, which gauged
how much people knew about the issue and recorded personal viewpoints and preferences to
common practices link to waste and waste management. The first section of the survey contained
simple demographic information, such as the school attended, grade, and proximity to bodies of
water. The second section contained factual questions that were useful to gauge how much
participants knew about plastic pollution and waste management. Lastly, the third section
contained subjective questions which recorded plastic use preferences and opinions/views
towards plastic pollution. These questions were valuable for suggesting possible causes to the
issue. All of the survey results were displayed in graphs for comparison purposes.
Lin 11
Demographic Questions:
Lin 12
Factual Questions:
Subjective Questions:
Lin 13
It was surprising to see that the majority in every factual question was correct, with the
exception to the question regarding the location of the majority of plastic pollution in the ocean.
This showed that most people have a basic understanding of plastic pollution and its detrimental
effects for the environment. This is likely due to the emphasis on the negative effects that media
always puts on plastic pollution in oceans. Also, education in the U.S. does teach basic
fundamental ideas about plastic pollution, so that could attribute to the basic understanding that
people have. The subjective questions showed that most people do indeed consume plastic
products in common ways, with about 84% to 88% following traditional practices and 11% to
14% using other alternatives. This definitely explains that most are using plastic in their daily
lives and are contributing to the problem. The subjective questions also showed that more than
95% of people do view litter in daily lives, however only 66% doubt that the environment is
clean. What was interesting was that more than 98% of people were at least somewhat bothered
by litter in the environment and had a sense of responsibility to care for it; however 51% of
participants thought that others did not care for the environment. Lastly, there were mixed results
when people were asked whether or not they would pick up litter on the side of a sidewalk.
Reasons for saying yes were generally helping the environment and picking it up because no
one else would. Reasons for saying no mainly included fears of germs and dirtiness. Reasons
for saying depends mainly included proximity to trash bins, mood, and type of trash.
These results suggest many possible solutions for these problems and the research
question. People seem to be lacking in the trust of others for the well-being of the environment,
although most people do care about the environment. This suggests that people need to be more
environmentally conscious in their daily lives or have more community activities to show the
large amount of people who care about the environment. More education about plastic pollution
Lin 14
is not needed; most people have basic understandings of the issue. However, there is much
progress to be made on using other materials rather than plastic. More than 80% of people use
common consumer practices which are wasteful. Alternatives such as tote bags and water
canteens need to become more popularized and mainstream in order to reduce plastic
consumption. Also, many people fear of picking up litter because they dont want to carry trash
for long distances or because it is dirty. To avoid this problem, more neighborhood trash bins
should be placed and there should be stations where gloves could be distributed so people would
be more incentivized to pick up trash as they stroll around their neighborhood. Overall, this data
shows that there is much more progress and many solutions that need to become more popular
around the world. These suggested solutions are only a few of the many more that could be
implemented.
Discussion/Conclusion
There will be a time where humanity will look back and only think about what they could
have done rather than thinking about possible solutions now. If everyone takes part and
contributes their part to fixing the problem, there would be less pollution, more wildlife,
uncontaminated resources, and a vast amount of other environmental benefits for everyone and
everything around the world. These findings re-emphasize that there is much more
environmental progress to benefit the world as a whole. Many alternatives to plastic that have
been implemented, such as tote bags, are still not very popular and have a long way to go. The
hope of this research is to not only spread concern to the issue, but incentivize people to do
something. That is all these findings can do. Many people have the educational knowledge and
attitudes to fix the issue, but are simply lazy or non-active in actually resolving it. Even though
research was not conducted in Southeast Asia due to time and resource purposes, they still
Lin 15
greatly show that everyone needs to become more environmentally-active and fix the problems
that we have created. Also, the research was somewhat focused, as it only focused on the main
causes of plastic pollution rather than focusing on every individual one. Everyone can use less
plastic and pick up trash, which are two very simple solutions that can go a long way. Plastic
pollution and many other environmental problems are not going away anytime soon, especially if
humanity continues to continue their common practices. Big change starts with small things, and
with each additional individual effort, humanity will only get closer to saving themselves and the
world.
Lin 16
Bibliography
Eisenstark, Roma. "Chinas Rural Dumping Grounds." Slate, The Slate Group, 29 May 2015,
www.slate.com/articles/life/caixin/2015/05/china_s_waste_management_garbage_dispos
al_in_the_country_s_rural_areas_is.html. Accessed 11 Nov. 2016.
"History." Pollution Issues, Advameg, www.pollutionissues.com/Fo-Hi/History.html. Accessed 6
Oct. 2016.
"How plastic is made." PlasticsEurope, www.plasticseurope.org/what-is-plastic/
how-plastic-is-made.aspx. Accessed 17 Nov. 2016.
Indonesias Plastic Pollution Issue. 1 Million Women, 5 Aug. 2016, www.1millionwomen.com
.au/blog/indonesias-plastic-pollution-issue/ . Accessed 22 Dec. 2016.
Kukreja, Rinkesh. "What is Ocean Pollution?" Conserve Energy Future
www.conserve-energy-future.com/causes-and-effects-of-ocean-pollution.php. Accessed
23 Sept. 2016.
Lonne, Torben. "How Ocean Pollution Affects Humans [Infographic]." DIVE.in,
www.divein.com/articles/ocean-pollution/. Accessed 12 Oct. 2016.
"Ocean Pollution." National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Aug. 2011, www.noaa.gov/resource-collections/ocean-pollution. Accessed 15
Sept. 2016.
The Problem of Marine Plastic Pollution. Clean Water Action,
www.cleanwater.org/problem-marine-plastic-pollution. Accessed 23 Sept. 2016.
Vi, Thuy. "Plastic bag pollution continues unabated in Vietnam." Thanhnien News,
Thanhniennews.com, 18 Apr. 2015, www.thanhniennews.com/society/
plastic-bag-pollution-continues-unabated-in-vietnam-41110.html. Accessed 14 Dec.
2016.
Winn, Patrick. "5 countries dump more plastic into the oceans than the rest of the world
combined." PRI, Public Radio International, 13 Jan. 2016,
www.pri.org/stories/2016-01-13/5-countries-dump-more-plastic-oceans-rest-world-
combined. Accessed 17 Oct. 2016
Lin 17
Appendix A, pg.1
Appendix A, pg. 2
Lin 18
Appendix A, pg.
3
Lin 20
Appendix B
Lin 22
Interview Questions
1. How have rural communities have been affected by the rampant plastic pollution? Are
any communities almost or completely isolated from the problems of plastic pollution?
2. How does the population in Thailand value ocean plastic pollution? What about other
Southeastern Asian countries? What is the general idea surrounding it?
3. How have residents of Thailand and/or other countries taken advantage of the situation
other than collecting plastics for money? Have they used plastic for tools, crafts, etc.?
4. Are there other packaging material used other than plastic in Thailand and/or other
Southeastern countries? How often are these alternative materials used?
5. Does it seem like the government cares about waste management in Thailand? What is
the waste management structure like? What about other countries?
6. Are there any landfills in Thailand? What are they like? Is the trash contained or cared to
be contained? What are the attitudes of the workers?
7. How often do you see heaps of trash in your daily life in Thailand? Does it seem to
invade your life?
8. What degrading environmental effects have you observed? Are these effects drastic
enough to draw concern?