You are on page 1of 9

Urogynecology: Original Research

Postpartum Recovery of Levator Hiatus and


Bladder Neck Mobility in Relation
to Pregnancy
Jette Str-Jensen, MD, Franziska Siafarikas, MD, Gunvor Hilde, PT, PhD, J 
urat e_ Saltyt e_ Benth, PhD,
Kari B, PT, PhD, and Marie Ellstrm Engh, MD, PhD

OBJECTIVE: To study postpartum changes in pelvic floor decrease in all measurements was seen during the first
morphology in a cohort of primiparous women. 6 months postpartum, being most pronounced for the
METHODS: Transperineal ultrasound measurements levator hiatus area during Valsalva maneuver (23.5 cm2;
taken at five examination points, both prepartum P,.001). In the cesarean delivery group, no significant
and postpartum, provided data for comparison. Three changes between examination points were found post-
hundred nulliparous pregnant women were examined partum. Only the vaginal delivery group showed signifi-
at 21 weeks of gestation and 274 (91%) at 37 weeks of cant increases in all measurements when comparing the
gestation. At 6 weeks postpartum, 285 (95%) women status at 12 months postpartum with 21 weeks of gesta-
were examined, 198 (66%) at 6 months, and 178 (59%) tion, most pronounced for levator hiatus area during Val-
at 12 months using transperineal ultrasonography salva maneuver (3 cm2; P,.001). However, comparing the
at rest, during contraction, and during Valsalva two delivery groups at 12 months postpartum, the only
maneuver. The levator hiatus area, bladder neck significant difference found was levator hiatus area dur-
mobility, and rest-to-Valsalva hiatal area difference ing contraction.
were assessed. CONCLUSION: The levator ani muscle has the ability to
RESULTS: Approximately 85% had vaginal and 15% had recover after pregnancy and delivery, although not all
cesarean deliveries. Demographic characteristics of the women recover to pregnancy level. Most of the recovery
patients lost to follow-up were similar to the patients not occurs during the first 6 months postpartum. Significant
lost to follow-up. In the vaginal group, a significant pregnancy-induced changes are not shown to persist 1
year postpartum.
(Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:5319)
See related editorial on page 529.
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000645
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II

T
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and HKH, Research Cen-
tre, Akershus University Hospital, Lrenskog, and the University of Oslo, Faculty he pelvic floor muscles support the pelvic organs
Division Akershus University Hospital, and the Department of Sports Medicine, and play an important role in maintaining their
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
position and function. The pelvic floor, or pelvic dia-
Supported by grants from the Norwegian South-Eastern Regional Health
Authority.
phragm, forms a sheet of muscle that spans the pelvic
cavity with the levator ani muscle being an essential
Presented in part at the 43rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the International
Continence Society (ICS 2013), August 2630, 2013, Barcelona, Spain. part.1 It allows for the passage of the urethra, vagina,
The authors thank Kristin Gjestland for image analysis and midwife Tone and rectum through the levator hiatus. Many women
Breines Simonsen for recruiting participants and administering clinical appoint- experience pelvic organ dysfunction at some stage in
ments and electronic questionnaires. their lives2 and vaginal delivery has been established
Corresponding author: Jette Str-Jensen, MD, Akershus University Hospital, as one of the most important risk factors associated
Lrenskog, Norway; e-mail: jett@ahus.no.
with dysfunction later in life.3
Financial Disclosure
The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
However, it is not only events during parturition
that can affect pelvic organ support. An increase in the
2015 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published
by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. size of the levator hiatus area has been shown to occur
ISSN: 0029-7844/15 in the antepartum period.46 Women who go on to

VOL. 125, NO. 3, MARCH 2015 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY 531

Copyright by The American College of Obstetricians


and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
have caesarean deliveries may also experience loss of 21 weeks of gestation
pelvic floor support, which strengthens the conclusion Ultrasound examinations (N=300)
Participants enrolled (N=300)
that changes that take place during pregnancy might
cause this effect.7 We have previously reported preg- Study exclusions (n=4)
Intrauterine fetal death: 2
nancy data from this cohort of women,4 but there is Premature delivery at less than
a lack of longitudinal imaging studies addressing pos- 32 weeks of gestation: 2
Dropped out (n=6)
sible changes in levator ani morphology after delivery Missing at this examination (n=16)
compared with changes during pregnancy. Delivery before examination: 15
Missing ultrasound volumes: 1
The aim was to study changes in pelvic floor
37 weeks of gestation
morphology after both vaginal and caesarean deliv- Ultrasound examinations (n=274)
eries using three- and four-dimensional ultrasonogra- Participants enrolled (n=290)
phy and compare these changes with prepartum data
in a cohort of primiparous women followed longitu- Study exclusions (n=1)
Intrauterine fetal death: 1
dinally and examined at five set points. Dropped out (n=4)

MATERIALS AND METHODS 6 weeks postpartum


Ultrasound examinations (n=285)
This prospective cohort study was performed at Participants enrolled (n=285)
Akershus University Hospital, Lrenskog, Norway, Study exclusions (n=75)
from January 2010 to October 2012. This study Randomized to pelvic floor
muscle training: 71
presents data from an observational study on pelvic Pregnant: 4
floor changes during and after pregnancy and data Dropped out (n=12)

analyzed in this study are a follow-up to previously 6 months postpartum


presented data on this cohort of women during preg- Ultrasound examinations (n=198)
Participants enrolled (n=198)
nancy.4 Nulliparous pregnant women were invited to
Study exclusions (n=7)
participate when they attended their routine second- Pregnant: 7
trimester ultrasound examination at 1822 weeks of Dropped out (n=12)
Missing at this examination (n=1)
gestation. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancy, Missing ultrasound volumes: 1
speaking a Scandinavian language, being older than 12 months postpartum
18 years of age with no prior pregnancy lasting more Ultrasound examinations (n=178)
Participants enrolled (n=179)
than 16 weeks, and no serious illness. Exclusion cri-
teria were miscarriage, stillbirth, premature delivery Fig. 1. Diagram illustrating the number of women exam-
before 32 weeks of gestation, new pregnancy of more ined at each consultation and the various reasons for non-
than 6 weeks, or randomization to intervention with participation.
Str-Jensen. Recovery of the Levator Ani Muscle After Delivery.
pelvic floor muscle training at 6 weeks postpartum.8
Obstet Gynecol 2015.
The Regional Ethics Committee (REK Sr-st D
2009/170) and the Norwegian Social Science Data
Service (2799026) approved the study, and all parti- supine lithotomy position after voiding with a 4- to
cipants gave their written informed consent to 8-MHz curved array ultrasonography transducer.
participate. Measurements were taken at rest, during pelvic floor
A power calculation was performed using results muscle contraction, and during Valsalva maneuver by
from a previous study9 in which a sample size of 47 two trained examiners. The women were examined at
was required to detect a 5% change in levator hiatus 21 and 37 weeks of gestation and 6 weeks, 6 months,
area at rest with a two-sided a of 0.05 and a power of and 12 months postpartum.
80%. We decided to include 300 women at 21 weeks Correct pelvic floor muscle contraction was
of gestation to preserve the power, taking into account taught by a physiotherapist and verified by observa-
the possibility of women dropping out and exclusions tion of inward perineal movement and vaginal palpa-
resulting from women participating in a randomized tion. The Valsalva maneuver was performed for at
controlled trial of postpartum pelvic floor muscle least 6 seconds10; care was taken to avoid cocontrac-
training.8 Demographic data and delivery data were tion of the most medial part of the levator ani muscle
collected from the womens electronic medical re- during the Valsalva maneuver.
cords and from a questionnaire exploring additional Each maneuver was recorded three times and
background data. All women underwent a three- and stored offline using anonymous code numbers. The
four-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography in the examiners were blinded to the womens clinical data.

532 Str-Jensen et al Recovery of the Levator Ani Muscle After Delivery OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Copyright by The American College of Obstetricians


and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Table 1. Background Variables of the Study Population

Variable Outcome

Background data at inclusion (N5300)


Prepregnancy BMI (kg/m2) 23.963.9
Maternal age (y) 28.664.3
University or higher education 226/300 (75.3)
Married or cohabitant 287/300 (95.7)
Ethnicity Caucasian 288/300 (96.0)
Delivery data (n5287)
Gestational age at delivery (d) 280.8610.4
Birth weight (g) 3,4976510
Vaginal delivery 243/287 (84.7)
Normal 196/287 (68.3)
Instrumental 47/287 (16.4)
Vacuum 43/287 (15)
Forceps 4/287 (1.4)
Cesarean delivery 44/287 (15.3)
Prelabor and 1st stage 39/287 (13.6)
2nd stage 5/287 (1.7)
Examinations
Gestational age at 1st examination (wk) (N5300) 20.961.4
Vaginal delivery 249/294* (84.7)
Cesarean delivery 45/294* (15.3)
Gestational age at 2nd examination (wk) (n5274) 37.060.7
Vaginal delivery 230/271 (84.9)
Caesarian delivery 41/271 (15.1)
Weeks postpartum at 3rd examination (wk) (n5285) 6.261.1
Vaginal delivery 242/285 (85)
Caesarian delivery 43/285 (15)
Weeks postpartum at 4th examination (wk) (n5198) 26.662.5
Vaginal delivery 159/198 (80.3)
Caesarian delivery 39/198 (19.7)
Weeks postpartum at 5th examination (wk) (n5178) 51.663.5
Vaginal delivery 144/179 (80.4)
Caesarian delivery 35/179 (19.6)
BMI, body mass index.
Data are mean6standard deviation or n/N (%).
* Missing delivery data for six women.

Missing delivery data for three women.

Postpartum, the womens lower abdomen and pelvis a reference plane using the definition described by
was covered by a sheet and they were asked not to Dietz.12 Partial defects were defined as abnormal muscle
divulge any information regarding their deliveries. insertions present in fewer than all three central planes.
All volumes were analyzed using 4D View 7.0 Enlarged levator hiatus (also called ballooning)
and 10.0. The levator hiatus area was measured as the was defined as a levator hiatus area of more than 25
area bordered by the most medial part of the levator cm2 during the Valsalva maneuver.13 The ability of
ani muscle, the symphysis pubis, and the inferior the levator ani muscle to distend was shown in the
pubic ramus using methodology as previously absolute difference between measurements of the
described.4 The bladder neck was measured in the levator hiatus area (cm2) at rest and during maximal
midsagittal plane using a coordinate system as Valsalva maneuver14 named rest-to-Valsalva hiatal
described by Peschers11 between rest and Valsalva area difference.
maneuver. A higher value represents a more mobile Volumes were analyzed by four trained inves-
bladder neck. tigators (with intraclass correlation coefficient greater
Major defects of levator ani muscle were assessed than 0.80).4 Evaluations of major levator ani muscle
using tomographic ultrasonography imaging on the defects were performed by two of the investigators.
axial plane at maximal pelvic floor muscle contraction. Interrater agreement between them was good to
The plane of minimal hiatal dimensions was used as excellent (k greater than 0.63).15

VOL. 125, NO. 3, MARCH 2015 Str-Jensen et al Recovery of the Levator Ani Muscle After Delivery 533

Copyright by The American College of Obstetricians


and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Cesarean delivery Cesarean delivery
15 Vaginal delivery 12 Vaginal delivery

14 11

10
cm2

cm2
13
9
12
8
11 7

10 6
21 weeks 37 weeks 6 weeks 6 months 12 months 21 weeks 37 weeks 6 weeks 6 months 12 months
of gestation of gestation postpartum postpartum postpartum of gestation of gestation postpartum postpartum postpartum

A Time B Time

Cesarean delivery Cesarean delivery


23 2.8
Vaginal delivery Vaginal delivery
21 2.5

19 2.2
cm2

cm
17 1.9

15 1.6

13 1.3
21 weeks 37 weeks 6 weeks 6 months 12 months 21 weeks 37 weeks 6 weeks 6 months 12 months
of gestation of gestation postpartum postpartum postpartum of gestation of gestation postpartum postpartum postpartum

Time Time

Fig. 2. Estimated mean levator hiatus area at rest (A), levator hiatus area during contraction (B), levator hiatus area during
Valsalva maneuver (C), and bladder neck mobility (D) at 21 weeks of gestation, 37 weeks of gestation, 6 weeks postpartum,
6 months postpartum, and 12 months postpartum for vaginal and cesarean deliveries with 95% confidence intervals.
Asterisks indicate significant differences between the two delivery groups.
Str-Jensen. Recovery of the Levator Ani Muscle After Delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2015.

The assessors were blinded to the womens ibility of the fetal head on most images taken at 37
obstetric history and prior examinations. Images weeks of gestation).
were analyzed in random order to avoid pairwise SAS 9.3 and SPSS 20 were used for statistical
analysis, because it was not possible to blind the as- analysis. Demographic data and ultrasound measure-
sessors to the number of weeks of gestation (eg, vis- ments were reported as means and standard

Table 2. Change in Levator Hiatus Area at Rest, During Maximal Contraction and during Maximal Valsalva
Maneuver, Bladder Neck Mobility, and Rest-to-Valsalva Hiatal Area Difference Between
Examinations
Postpartum
Variable 6 wk to 6 mo P 6 mo to 12 mo P

Vaginal delivery
Levator hiatus area at rest (cm2) 21.360.2 [242, 159] ,.001 0.260.2 [159, 143] .38
Levator hiatus area contraction (cm2) 21.660.1 [242, 159] ,.001 0.0460.1 [159, 143] .77
Levator hiatus area Valsalva (cm2) 23.560.3 [241, 159] ,.001 0.0160.4 [159, 142] .97
Bladder neck mobility (cm) 20.2260.1 [241, 157] .001 20.0760.1 [157, 142] .35
Rest-to-Valsalva hiatal area difference (cm2) 22.260.3 [241, 159] ,.001 20.160.3 [159, 142] .72
Cesarean delivery
Levator hiatus area at rest (cm2) 0.0260.3 [43, 39] .96 0.360.4 [39, 35] .39
Levator hiatus area contraction (cm2) 0.160.3 [43, 38] .77 0.160.3 [38, 35] .69
Levator hiatus area Valsalva (cm2) 0.360.7 [43, 39] .66 0.360.8 [39, 35] .67
Bladder neck mobility (cm) 0.0560.2 [42, 38] .72 0.0660.2 [38, 33] .69
Rest-to-Valsalva hiatal area difference (cm2) 0.360.7 [43, 38] .66 0.160.7 [38, 35] .84
Data are estimated mean difference6standard deviation [n, n] for each of the examinations included in the comparison unless otherwise
specified.
Bold indicates significant P values.

534 Str-Jensen et al Recovery of the Levator Ani Muscle After Delivery OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Copyright by The American College of Obstetricians


and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
deviations or frequencies and percentages. Normality examined at each consultation and the various reasons
of the data was assessed visually by histogram and for nonparticipation. Of the 300 nulliparous pregnant
QQ-plot. Independent samples t test and x2 test (or women examined at 21 weeks of gestation, 274 (91%)
Fishers exact test) were used to compare continuous were examined at 37 weeks of gestation. At 6 weeks
and categorical background variables between the postpartum, 285 (95%) women were examined, 198
study group and background population. The McNe- (66%) at 6 months, and 178 (59%) at 12 months.
mar test was applied for a comparison of major leva- Background variables are presented in Table 1.
tor ani muscle defects and enlarged hiatus over time. Some of these data were originally presented in
A linear mixed model, correctly adjusting for within- a cross-sectional study on continence and pelvic
patient correlations as a result of repeated measure- floor status at midpregnancy.16 Our study sample
ments, was used to assess the changes in ultrasound was comparable to the total population of nullipa-
measurements from 21 weeks of gestation until 1 year rous women scheduled to deliver at Akershus Uni-
postpartum. Random intercepts accounting for versity Hospital during the inclusion period
within-patient variability were included in the model. (n52,621) with respect to age and marital and
Dummy variables were created for each of the five cohabitation status and delivery mode, but the
examination points and included in the model as fixed women in the study sample had higher educational
effects together with the variable defining delivery status (75.3% compared with 50.8%, P,.001).
mode. To assess the differences in changes within We found no significant differences in back-
the two delivery mode groups, the interaction ground variables between the women who delivered
between dummies for time and delivery mode was vaginally and by cesarean delivery. Demographic
included. Mixed models utilize all available informa- characteristics of the patients lost to follow-up
tion on participants in contrast to an analysis of vari- (n5122) were similar to the patients not lost to
ance. The strength of the linear mixed model is the follow-up (n5178) with the exception of a slightly
ability to handle any degree of imbalance in data, higher number of married and cohabitant women
often occurring as a result of participants dropping completing the study.
out or missing examinations. P,.05 was considered Figure 2 shows estimated mean levator hiatus area
significant. and bladder neck mobility for the different delivery
groups from 21 weeks of gestation to 12 months post-
partum. Table 2 shows the estimated mean changes in
RESULTS variables between examinations postpartum as well as
Three hundred pregnant nulliparous women were between 12 months postpartum and pregnancy.
included at 21 weeks of gestation. Figure 1 shows A significant change toward a smaller levator
a flow diagram illustrating the number of women hiatus area at rest, during contraction, and during

12 Mo Postpartum Versus Pregnancy


12 mo Postpartum Versus 21 wk of Gestation P 12 mo Postpartum Versus 37 wk of Gestation P

0.560.2 [143, 249] .002 21.460.2 [143, 230] ,.001


0.760.1 [143, 249] ,.001 20.560.1 [143, 230] ,.001
3.060.4 [142, 249] ,.001 20.260.4 [142, 230] .56
0.5360.1 [142, 248] ,.001 0.4660.1 [142, 230] ,.001
2.560.3 [142, 249] ,.001 1.360.3 [142, 230] .001

20.460.3 [35, 45] .26 22.460.4 [35, 41] ,.001


20.360.3 [35, 45] .29 21.560.3 [35, 41] ,.001
1.160.8 [35, 45] .15 22.460.8 [35, 41] .002
0.2360.2 [33, 45] .13 0.0160.2 [33, 41] .62
1.661.2 [35, 44] .19 0.0660.7 [35, 41] .93

VOL. 125, NO. 3, MARCH 2015 Str-Jensen et al Recovery of the Levator Ani Muscle After Delivery 535

Copyright by The American College of Obstetricians


and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Table 3. Estimated Mean Differences Between Vaginal and Cesarean Delivery for Levator Hiatus Area at
Rest, During Contraction, and During Valsalva Maneuver, Bladder Neck Mobility, and Rest-to-
Valsalva Hiatal Area Difference During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Pregnancy
Variable 21 wk of Gestation P 37 wk of Gestation P

Levator hiatus area (cm2)


At rest 0.160.4 [249, 45] .80 0.160.4 [230, 41] .81
Contraction 0.460.3 [249, 45] .26 0.460.3 [230, 41] .26
Valsalva 0.160.9 [249, 45] .89 0.260.7 [230, 41] .82
Bladder neck mobility (cm) 0.0460.2 [248, 45] .78 0.160.2 [230, 41] .43
Rest-to-Valsalva hiatal area difference (cm2) 0.0360.8 [249, 44] .97 0.360.6 [230, 41] .67
Data are estimated mean difference6standard deviation [number of vaginal deliveries, number of cesarean deliveries] at each examination
unless otherwise specified.
Bold indicates significant P values.

Valsalva maneuver and further a decrease in bladder months (16/179 [8.9%]). For the 10 defects no longer
neck mobility was found in the vaginal group from 6 qualifying as major defects at 12 months, six were cat-
weeks to 6 months postpartum. From 6 months to 12 egorized as partial defects and four as normal. No de
months postpartum, no further significant change was novo major levator ani muscle defects were diagnosed
found in these variables. For the women who had at 6 months or 12 months postpartum.
a cesarean delivery, no significant change was found In the vaginal group there was a significant
among any of the examination points postpartum. (P5.025) reduction in the number of women with
Comparison between delivery mode groups enlarged levator hiatus between 6 weeks and 6
showed that women having delivered vaginally had months postpartum (Table 4). No further reduction
significantly larger levator hiatus measures and happened from 6 to 12 months postpartum. For the
increased bladder neck mobility both at 6 weeks and caesarean delivery group, the number of women with
at 6 months postpartum when compared with women enlarged levator hiatus remained stable in the post-
having a caesarean delivery (Table 3). At 12 months partum period.
postpartum a significant difference between delivery The only significant difference between delivery
mode groups was only found for levator hiatus during groups in the number of women with enlarged levator
contraction. hiatus was found at 6 weeks postpartum, in which
At 6 weeks postpartum, major defects of the more women having delivered vaginally had an
levator ani muscle were diagnosed in 26 of 179 enlarged levator hiatus (Table 4).
(14.5%) women, all of whom had delivered vaginally; Measuring the rest-to-Valsalva hiatal area differ-
of these, 14 had delivered normally and 12 had an ence (Fig. 3), a significant reduction was found only in
instrument-assisted delivery. No major defects were the vaginal delivery group from 6 weeks to 6 months
diagnosed in women who had a cesarean delivery. A postpartum with no further change from 6 to 12
significant reduction in diagnosed major levator ani months postpartum (Table 2). In group comparisons,
muscle defects was seen from 6 weeks (26/179 [14.5%]) the vaginal group showed a significantly greater rest-
to 6 months (19/179 [10.6%]) postpartum (P5.016) to-Valsalva hiatal area difference at 6 weeks postpar-
with minor changes occurring between 6 and 12 tum than the cesarean delivery group (Fig. 3; Table 3).

Table 4. Percentage and Absolute Numbers of Women With Enlarged Levator Hiatus Area During Valsalva
Maneuver (Levator Hiatus Area Greater Than 25 cm2)

21 wk of 37 wk of 6 wk 6 mo 12 mo
Variable Gestation Gestation Postpartum Postpartum Postpartum

Enlarged levator hiatus


Vaginal delivery (n5142) 4.9 (7) 13.4 (19) 26.8 (38) 14.8 (21) 14.1 (20)
Cesarean delivery (n535) 2.9 (1) 20.0 (7) 11.4 (4) 5.7 (2) 14.3 (5)
Data are % (n).

536 Str-Jensen et al Recovery of the Levator Ani Muscle After Delivery OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Copyright by The American College of Obstetricians


and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Postpartum
6 wk P 6 mo P 12 mo P

2.460.4 [242, 43] ,.001 1.260.4 [159, 39] .006 1.060.4 [143, 35] .02
3.260.3 [242, 43] ,.001 1.460.3 [159, 38] ,.001 1.460.4 [143, 35] ,.001
6.160.9 [241, 43] ,.001 2.361.0 [159, 39] .01 2.061.0 [142, 35] .05
0.760.2 [241, 42] ,.001 0.460.2 [157, 38] .01 0.360.2 [142, 33] .12
3.760.8 [241, 43] ,.001 1.260.8 [159, 38] .14 1.060.8 [142, 35] .25

However, at 6 months and 12 months postpartum, the delivery group, the rest-to-Valsalva hiatal area differ-
two delivery groups did not differ significantly. ence remained unchanged compared with pregnancy.
When comparing levator hiatus measurements
and bladder neck mobility at 12 months postpartum
DISCUSSION
with measurements at 21 weeks of gestation, there
Our findings indicate that the levator ani muscle has
were significant increases in all measurements in the
an ability to recover from the effects of pregnancy and
vaginal delivery group (Fig. 2; Table 2). However, if
delivery; however, not all women recover to their
comparing measurements at 12 months postpartum
pregnancy level. Most of the recovery happens during
with those of 37 weeks of gestation, there was a signif-
the first 6 months postpartum.
icant decrease in the levator hiatus area at rest and
during contraction, although not during Valsalva Strengths of the study include the longitudinal
maneuver. In the vaginal delivery group, bladder neck design, high interobserver reliability of data,17 and use
mobility was significantly higher at 12 months postpar- of a linear mixed model, accommodating for imbal-
tum than at 37 weeks of gestation. For the cesarean ance in data and for correlations among repeated
group no significant changes were seen when compar- measures. Limitations include the limited number of
ing levator hiatus measurements or bladder neck cesarean deliveries and unavailability of prepregnant
mobility at 12 months postpartum with 21 weeks of measurements. We have chosen .05 as the level of
gestation. However, when comparing 12 months post- significance. However, to reduce the risk of false-
partum with 37 weeks of gestation, there was a signifi- positive findings resulting from multiple tests, findings
cant decrease in all levator hiatus area measurements with levels of significance above .01 should be inter-
for the cesarean delivery group. No significant differ- preted with caution.
ence was seen for bladder neck mobility. Most of the recovery of the levator ani muscle
In the vaginal delivery group, the number of women happens during the first 6 months after delivery.
with enlarged levator hiatus had increased significantly Magnetic resonance imaging studies report recovery
(P5.02) at 12 months postpartum when compared with during the first months postpartum,18,19 whereas
21 weeks of gestation (Table 4) but not when compared others found no significant changes in levator hiatus
with 37 weeks of gestation. For the cesarean delivery dimensions from 4 months to 3 years postpartum.20
group, the number of women whose levator hiatus This is in accordance with our findings and could
became enlarged between 21 weeks of gestation and indicate that recovery takes place early postpartum,
12 months postpartum (Table 4) was greater than in but the duration of recovery varies according to
the vaginal delivery group. However, this may not be whether the changes were induced by pregnancy,
statistically significant as a result of the small sample size. delivery, or both, as seen in Figure 2.
Major defects of the levator ani muscle were We found increased bladder neck mobility after
diagnosed only postpartum in the vaginal delivery vaginal delivery with a tendency for recovery the first 6
group, so compared with prepartum figures, there was months postpartum in accordance with several other
a substantial increase 1 year postpartum. studies.2124 Diverging conclusions concerning bladder
The rest-to-Valsalva hiatal area difference was neck mobility after cesarean delivery have been pub-
significantly increased for the vaginal delivery group lished.21,24,25 However, most studies are in accordance
when comparing 12 months postpartum with 21 and with our results showing that bladder neck mobility is
37 weeks of gestation (Table 2; Fig. 3). For the cesarean not significantly increased after cesarean delivery.

VOL. 125, NO. 3, MARCH 2015 Str-Jensen et al Recovery of the Levator Ani Muscle After Delivery 537

Copyright by The American College of Obstetricians


and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
10
Cesarean delivery
9
Vaginal delivery
8 Fig. 3. Rest-to-Valsalva estimated
7 mean hiatal area difference at 21
6
weeks of gestation, 37 weeks of
cm2

gestation, 6 weeks postpartum, 6


5 months postpartum, and 12
4 months postpartum for vaginal
and cesarean deliveries in cm2
3
with 95% confidence intervals.
2 Asterisk indicates significant dif-
1 ferences between the two delivery
21 weeks 37 weeks 6 weeks 6 months 12 months groups.
of gestation of gestation postpartum postpartum postpartum Str-Jensen. Recovery of the Levator
Ani Muscle After Delivery. Obstet
Time Gynecol 2015.

The largest change in the prevalence of visible paring the two delivery groups, no significant differ-
major levator ani muscle defects was found during the ences were found in bladder neck mobility, enlarged
first 6 months postpartum. Overdiagnosing early after levator hiatus, and the rest-to-Valsalva hiatal area dif-
delivery as a result of edema26 has been put forward as ference 1 year postpartum. This could indicate a trend
a possible reason for the decrease in numbers of vis- toward persistent pregnancy-induced changes, as
ible defects seen later postpartum, but a natural heal- found in other studies.14,24 However, these findings
ing process cannot be excluded.20,27 did not reach statistical significance in our population
The rest-to-Valsalva hiatal area difference and the using linear mixed models.
number of women with an enlarged levator hiatus both The clinical implications of our findings suggest
decreased most during the first 6 months after vaginal that most women can be reassured that recovery takes
delivery. Interestingly, the number of women having an place after delivery, although they must be aware that
enlarged levator hiatus increased during pregnancy4 and some changes may persist.
at 1 year postpartum, no difference between delivery We found that the levator ani muscle has a large
groups was found. An increased ability to stretch the potential for recovery from both pregnancy and
muscle fibers and the connective tissue during pregnancy delivery in the majority of women. We found no
might help protect the muscle during parturition,28 evidence that changes in levator ani muscle morpho-
although postpartum the same features have been put logy seen during pregnancy persisted 1 year post-
forward as an indicator of less firm support for the pelvic partum. However, the fact that the levator ani muscle
organs.14 Furthermore, it is not known whether an has undergone these changes during pregnancy might
enlarged levator hiatus 1 year postpartum is associated make the pelvic floor less able to withstand the
with pelvic organ prolapse as it is later in life.29 development of pelvic floor disorders when other risk
Even if recovery takes place, the levator ani muscle factors are added later in life.
does not seem to have recovered completely 12
months after pregnancy and vaginal delivery. Similar REFERENCES
findings have been reported in another longitudinal 1. Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Functional anatomy of the
study.14 Injury to the muscle, but also injury to the female pelvic floor. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007;1101:26696.
connective tissue and nerves, might contribute. 2. Ashton-Miller JA, Delancey JO. On the biomechanics of vagi-
Contrary to others,14,21,24 we found no evidence nal birth and common sequelae. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2009;
that changes in levator ani muscle morphology seen 11:16376.
during pregnancy, reflected as changes after cesarean 3. Patel DA, Xu X, Thomason AD, Ransom SB, Ivy JS,
delivery, persisted 1 year postpartum. In the cesarean DeLancey JO. Childbirth and pelvic floor dysfunction: an epi-
demiologic approach to the assessment of prevention opportu-
delivery group, we found a small increase in the rest- nities at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:238.
to-Valsalva hiatal area difference, an increase of mean
4. Str-Jensen J, Siafarikas F, Hilde G, B K, Engh ME. Ultraso-
levator hiatus area during Valsalva maneuver of 1 nographic evaluation of pelvic organ support during pregnancy.
cm2, and also an increase in the number of women Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:32936.
with enlarged levator hiatus at 12 months postpartum 5. Dietz HP. Levator function before and after childbirth. Aust N
compared with pregnancy. Furthermore, when com- Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;44:1923.

538 Str-Jensen et al Recovery of the Levator Ani Muscle After Delivery OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Copyright by The American College of Obstetricians


and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
6. Chan S, Cheung R, Yiu K, Lee L, Leung T, Chung T. Pelvic dynamic magnetic resonance after vaginal birth. Am J Obstet
floor biometry during a first singleton pregnancy and the rela- Gynecol 2009;201:514.e17.
tionship with symptoms of pelvic floor disorders: a prospective
19. Tunn R, DeLancey JO, Howard D, Thorp JM, Ashton-Miller JA,
observational study. BJOG 2014;121:1219.
Quint LE. MR imaging of levator ani muscle recovery following
7. Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I. Prevalence and vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1999;
risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: 10:3007.
a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or
20. Shek KL, Chantarasorn V, Langer S, Dietz HP. Does levator
caesarean delivery. BJOG 2013;120:15260.
trauma heal? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;40:5705.
8. Hilde G, Str-Jensen J, Siafarikas F, Ellstrm Engh M, B K.
21. Shek KL, Kruger J, Dietz HP. The effect of pregnancy on hiatal
Postpartum pelvic floor muscle training and urinary incontinence:
dimensions and urethral mobility: an observational study. Int
a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:12318.
Urogynecol J 2012;23:15617.
9. Braekken IH, Majida M, Engh ME, B K. Morphological
22. Shek KL, Dietz HP, Kirby A. The effect of childbirth on ure-
changes after pelvic floor muscle training measured by 3-
dimensional ultrasonography: a randomized controlled trial. thral mobility: a prospective observational study. J Urol 2010;
Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:31724. 184:62934.

10. Orejuela FJ, Shek KL, Dietz HP. The time factor in the assess- 23. Wijma J, Potters AE, de Wolf BT, Tinga DJ, Aarnoudse JG.
ment of prolapse and levator ballooning. Int Urogynecol J Anatomical and functional changes in the lower urinary tract
2012;23:1758. following spontaneous vaginal delivery. BJOG 2003;110:
65863.
11. Peschers U, Schaer G, Anthuber C, Delancey JO, Schuessler B.
Changes in vesical neck mobility following vaginal delivery. 24. Chan SS, Cheung RY, Yiu K, Lee L, Chung TK. Pelvic floor
Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:10016. biometry of Chinese primiparous women one year after deliv-
ery: a prospective observational study. Ultrasound Obstet Gy-
12. Dietz HP, Bernardo MJ, Kirby A, Shek KL. Minimal criteria for necol 2014;43:46674.
the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomo-
graphic ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22:699704. 25. Toozs-Hobson P, Balmforth J, Cardozo L, Khullar V,
Athanasiou S. The effect of mode of delivery on pelvic floor
13. Dietz HP, Shek C, De Leon J, Steensma AB. Ballooning of the functional anatomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct
levator hiatus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:67680. 2008;19:40716.
14. van Veelen GA, Schweitzer KJ, van der Vaart CH. Ultrasound 26. Miller JM, Brandon C, Jacobson JA, Low LK, Zielinski R, Ash-
imaging of the pelvic floor: changes in anatomy during and after ton-Miller J, et al. MRI findings in patients considered high risk
first pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:47680. for pelvic floor injury studied serially after vaginal childbirth.
15. Staer-Jensen J, Siafarikas F, Hilde G, Braekken IH, B K, AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:78691.
Engh ME. Pelvic floor muscle injuries 6 weeks post partuman 27. Branham V, Thomas J, Jaffe T, Crockett M, South M,
intra- and inter-rater study. Neurourol Urodyn 2013;32:9937. Jamison M, et al. Levator ani abnormality 6 weeks after deliv-
16. Hilde G, Str-Jensen J, Ellstrm Engh M, Brkken IH, ery persists at 6 months. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:65.
B K. Continence and pelvic floor status in nulliparous e16.
women at midterm pregnancy. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23: 28. Siafarikas F, Str-Jensen J, Hilde G, B K, Ellstrm Engh M.
125763. Levator hiatus dimensions in late pregnancy and the process of
17. Siafarikas F, Staer-Jensen J, Braekken IH, B K, Engh ME. labor: a 3- and 4-dimensional transperineal ultrasound study.
Learning process for performing and analyzing 3D/4D trans- Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:484.e17.
perineal ultrasound imaging and interobserver reliability study. 29. Dietz HP, Franco AV, Shek KL, Kirby A. Avulsion injury and
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:3127. levator hiatal ballooning: two independent risk factors for pro-
18. Yousuf AA, DeLancey JO, Brandon CJ, Miller JM. Pelvic struc- lapse? An observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
ture and function at 1 month compared to 7 months by 2012;91:2114.

VOL. 125, NO. 3, MARCH 2015 Str-Jensen et al Recovery of the Levator Ani Muscle After Delivery 539

Copyright by The American College of Obstetricians


and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

You might also like