Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shireen Mirza
This article seeks to think about decline as part of the sociology of time, by exploring ways
former politically dominant communities seek to negotiate their ritual traditions by forging
newer relationships to modern time. The article offers an ethnography of decline among
the Shia community of Hyderabad old city, whose weakened political status by colonial
modernity speaks in different ways of the experience of the contemporary as diachronic
and not in succession with the past. These perceptions of decline describe the moral loss
of the Shia community through the spatial decline of Hyderabad old city, as a fallen state
that has been produced by Muslim actors in time as well as located in the nature of time
upon the community. The article reflects on the contradictory perceptions of decline that
describes the deprivations produced by time as well as implicates community actors as
offenders in time who are seen to persist with the performance of rituals as meaningless
actions. What are the relations to time being forged that make communities redefine culture
in ways that are temporally meaningful to them, given their representation of belonging to
the contemporary as implicating the decline of their civilisation?
Keywords: sociology of time, urban decline, ritual, memory and history, Indian Islam,
princely state of Hyderabad, Islamic Revolution in Iran
I
Introduction
Although the Shia community constitutes a minority amongst Muslims,
in the city of Hyderabad in Indias Deccan, they were dominant Muslim
elite. The community was founded on a theology of persecution that offers
Shireen Mirza is at the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, Delhi, India.
Email: shireen.mirza@gmail.com
1
Tanya Luhrmanns study on the Parsi colonial elite shows that the Parsi identification
with colonial symbolism of racial masculinity gave rise to a masculine ethos of cultural
superiority that the Parsis have sought to emulate. Luhrmann uses the concept of symbolic
entailment to explain how shifts in power relations can cause a dramatic reversal in the
self-description of the community. The Parsis, she shows, are gripped with a sense of moral
failure that leads to the self-condemnation of the contemporary community-self (Luhrmann
1994: 33357).
the 1857 rebellion. While the Shias trace their loss of political power to
colonial rule, the postcolonial state brought about a greater alienation.
The community altogether withdrew from the formal sphere of secular
politics and retreated into the personalised religious realm.
The weakened Shia was revitalised by the Islamic Revolution of Iran
in 1979 that acted as the second episode in the community mythology to
regenerate the diasporic Shia identity seen as in urgent need of revival, re-
making and rescuing. In particular, effects of the colonial disciplining of
religion as irrational ritualism and separate from public reason were sought
to be overturned, by re-articulating the religious as part of the political as
well as in continuity with historical time. This article describes these efforts
at community remaking in the aftermath of waning political power that
seeks to redefine the role of ritualism as well as its relation to the ethical
and the political. It explores the ways communities strive to respond to a
colonial mediation of modernity and effects of neoliberal urban processes
that are experienced as having wrecked life-worlds.2 What one finds in
the case of Shias of Hyderabad are common expressions of decline that
see the contemporary as a sign of concealed divinity, as moral decay and
urban decline.3 These expressions of decline, as I seek to show, return to
2
A large literature on tribal and indigenous worlds similarly describes the loss of traditional
community life-worlds, due to the displacement from land and disappearance of community-
owned forests (Kirsch 2001; Olwig and Hastrup 1997; Read 1996). Deborah Rose, for instance,
describes aboriginal characterisation of land that is no longer managed by caretakers as a loss
of life, loss of support systems as well as loss of relationships with nature, far beyond mere
claims of loss of land ownership (Rose 1996: 2021). The sociology of decline in this literature
links material property to culture, nature, belonging and a social ecology of networks and
relationships. The realm of memory is highlighted as giving prominence to a sacred landscape
where all embedded stories of the past and ancestors are linked to physical location as part of
new strategies to preserve memories and identity. The return to a golden age of community
autonomy and control is made possible through a re-engagement with tradition, making it
possible to look for reasons of failure of the historical within the traditional.
3
Modern social science has paid little attention to the domain of collective emotions,
such as loss, melancholia and nostalgia that are non-evidentiary and yet persistent, dismissing
efforts of community revivalism as elitist, regressive and based on a politics of lack that
is unworthy of engagement. Sumathy Ramaswamy writing on loss describes its reduction
to pathology in the social sciencesas one that is unproductive and needs to be overcome
or curtailed (Ramaswamy 2004). Contrary to this, Ramaswamys work on the lost land
of Lemuria reminds us that the preoccupation with loss can be socially and materially
productive. Thoman Blom Hansens book Melancholia of Freedom: Social Life in an Indian
Township in South Africa (2012) is also another instance of this.
4
Much writing has linked nostalgia and an assertion of tradition as a product of modern time,
thereby interrogating the construction of tribe as a primordial category. Prathama Banerjee, for
instance, explores ways modern time retains the category of the primitive by reducing tribe to
the domain of culture and locality. She describes a temporal contradiction in ways the Bengali
tribe of the Santhals experience time. The relationship of the Santhali past to the present,
Banerjee argues, is a contradiction, a temporal split whereby historical time was split into two
in colonial Bengal: the modern and the primitive, giving rise to what she calls a temporal
schizophrenia. For the Santali, on the one hand, the present was experienced as debilitating
and as loss, where the indigenous peoples history by the nature of a historical explanation is
seen as economically backward blaming the primitive mentality for the present fallen state of
the colonised. On the other, the present was one of hope and freedom, which could be seen
as an inheritance of an ancient and glorious past. She reads the Santali rebellion as a mode
of repossessing and reshaping temporality of a colonial modernity, by invoking rebellion not
merely as a crucial inheritance of the past but also as the unfinished nature of the Santali past.
The resolution of the paradox of time was to carve a place outside history, where conversion
from mythic to a historical past led to newly rationalised time in which stories and memories
were preserved as object forms in the figure of the primordial that acted as a counterpoise to
history and the nation. In so doing, the remaking of the indigenous self is seen as an exercise
in doing history that carves a space outside it (see Prathama Banerjee 2002, 2006a, b).
II
Personal and spatial decline
My summer school vacations from 1983 to 1996 were spent in Hyderabad
old city where we visited my grandmother who lived with my two aunts
and their families in the northern suburb of Hyderabad old city called
Chaderghat. By the time of my encounter with the old city, known through
my mothers house in Chaderghat, there was no posh suburb of the
British residents, but wreckages of old bungalows. Our house, for instance,
was used as a rest house by travelling Iranian students and merchants to
Hyderabad city, which by the 1980s was in dilapidated condition, divided
into three portions held together by a tiled roof that leaked during the
monsoons and blew away when the winds were strong.
The summer vacation was spent in a sort of family congregation with
my grandmother, my aunts and their children in the house, engaged in long
after-meal conversations dwelling almost always on the past. There were
two catastrophes in my grandmothers life that cast a shadow on how she
and my aunts talked of the past. The first was a more recent loss of her
firstborn child in 1988, who was on the flight from Iran to Dubai when
the United States navy shot down the civilian Iran Air Flight 655 in the
Sea of Bandar Abbas. My eldest aunt was in her 40s when she boarded
that flight. She was a professional translator at the time based in Tehran,
who translated texts from Persian to English and Urdu.
The second was when my grandmother was widowed in her mid-30s,
a few years after Indian independence, when her husband died unexpect-
edly of a sudden heart attack in the middle of the night. He left behind
five school-going daughters, a son, an infant (my mother) less than a few
months old, unclaimed land in Iran and an Urdu-medium school that
operated out of a rented portion of the house.
His death had left my grandmother unprepared to face the precarious
position that the family was suddenly reduced to, having lost their
status overnight. It had only been six years to the Police Action. At the
time, my grandmother and grandfather lived at the Royal Residence at
Bolarum in the suburb of the rapidly expanding Hyderabad city, away
from their home in the old city as well as the barracks of the British
residents at Secunderabad. At the palace in Bolarum, my grandfather
was employed as the controller of education and taught mathematics
to the grandsons of the Nizam. My grandmother described how the
grandson of the Nizam, the infant and nominated heir Mukarram Jah,
would call out to the daughter she lost Mehlaqa! Mehlaqa! standing
outside their window. Mehlaqa, all of five, she remembered, dashed to
the pond for a swim.
The day the Police Action took place, a palace guard marched into
their quarters announcing the orders to immediately vacate the premises
of the palace: your belongings will be sent to you later, he signed off.
The family left the royal residence in the dirty clothes they were wearing,
never to return. On the radio, they heard the Nizams last address as Ruler,
announcing that the army of the Indian Union had entered Hyderabad city
and that defeat was imminentpleading for calm and requesting people
to remain indoors in the coming days. At the end of the broadcast, they
heard the Nizam weep.
After the Police Action, the British residents of the princely state
abandoned their barracks in Secunderabad, symbolic of the change in the
rulers of Hyderabad. My grandfather had begun to work as a university
faculty employed by the Indian state, teaching mathematics at Osmania
University. My grandmother described this as a change of parties when
circumstances changed (hum us taraf ho gaye jab daur badal gaya). After
the death of my grandfather, the family lived on the rent obtained from
the Urdu-medium school. They also received a one-time honorarium in
recognition for the services of my grandfather to the family of the Nizam.
The honorarium was dispatched with a letter expressing condolence from
Princess Durru Shehvar, the wife of the Nizam and mother to the heir
apparent Prince Mukarram Jah, also the daughter of the last Caliph and
Ottoman emperor.
When my grandmother spoke of the days of the princely state, she spoke
nostalgically of better days, when the quality of rice was the finest, each
grain long and fragrant. She spoke of it as a time when vegetables were
available in abundance, in sacks of cauliflowers, cabbage and potatoes
with an announcementthis needs to go to the controller sahib (sir).
The nostalgia for better days described a dissonance between what once
existed and what exists, as two distinct times punctuated by the loss of
her husband.
This nostalgic recollection of lost time, of seeing, year after year,
misty-eyed adults reminiscing on better days they have seen, evoked
through affectivities of nostalgia, fashioned an image of loss that I found
elsewhere during my fieldwork amongst Shias of Hyderabad old city.
For instance, I was told of the glorious days of the old city, shared also
by other Muslim and Hindu residents, when they talk of the old city as
synonymous with better days. They broadly referred to a pre-urbanised era
when the temporal pace was slower, the River Musi was full, where open
space existed, the air was cleaner, people more civil and when a general
old worldly decorum of cultivated modes of address and comportment
existed. The story of the old city is popularly told as a story of spatial and
civilisational decline, as seemingly indicated in the decrepit state of its
current infrastructure, ruination of palaces and mansions of the erstwhile
nobility that gave way to urbanisation (Bawa 1987; Naidu 1990; Naidu
and Kamalakar 1988; Seshan 1993).
This story of decline is seen as part of a story of urbanisation prompted by
a dramatic demographic change post the violence of the Police Action that
resulted in an influx of rural Muslims and exodus of Hindus, making the old
city a predominantly Muslim area. The multiple deprivation of the old city is
told from the lack of sanitation and public roads due to the development of
slum-like pattern of settlements in the inner region of the city of Hyderabad
that adds to the representation of the old city as a place of ruinsof ruined
urbanisation and ruining by urbanisation (Simone 2004).
In revisiting memories of a lost and irrevocable time, what openings
did the past have I wondered, especially when the past was not experi-
enced in succession with the present? I found a wide and rich canvas of
descriptions of loss and urban decline that drew on the sacred memory
of the inaugural loss of the community described next, where moral
bankruptcy in the practice of religion and in modes of commemorating
the inaugural loss is seen as resulting in the contemporary as a condition
of backwardness and decline.
III
The inaugural loss
The Shia community collectively remembers the battle of Karbala that
took place in 680 ad in present-day Iraq as its inaugural moment. Karbala
was a political rebellion waged by Imam Hussain, the third Imam of the
Shia community and the grandson of the Prophet, against the Umayyad
Caliph. The rebellion is seen as a spectacular sacrifice of the lives of
women and children of the family of the Prophet, along with a small and
devoted army composed of his 72 companions and followers.
5
Dabashi refers to Karbala as the inaugural moment of injustice under which Shiism
was founded. He calls this the Karbala paradox, for according to him, Shiism produces
a transcendental philosophy based on insurrection. However, the instant its charismatic
leadership translates into political leadership, material success brings a moral failure,
which negates itself metaphysically, as soon as it succeeds politically. Shiism has
never surpassed its Karbala Paradox, he argues, which is constitutional to its moral and
material culture (Dabashi 2000: 484). Further, it produces paradoxes. First is the paradox
in which the ideals of justice produce a transcendental insurrectionary self along with a
collective memory of disenfranchisement, both of which are part of the historic collective
conscience. Second is its relation to the dominant, where by virtue of its own historical
roots, Shiism has been the historical other of Islam and believed in its own otherness
and its alterity, while at the same time dreaming of being the same and atrophying if
it becomes the same.
6
The idea of Karbala as a paradigm was framed by Michael Fischer. The Karbala
paradigm, according to Fischer, combines three basic sets of information that is seen as
fundamental to understanding Shiism. It combines enacting practices of the battle of Karbala,
such as those that R. Strothman has called the passion plays of Iran or ritual recreations of
the original battle of Karbala in processions in South Asia and other place.7 Second, these
enactments were patronised by the state, where Shiism was established as state religion by
the Safavid dynasty in 1501 in Iran and elsewhere where Shiism was officially declared as
the state religion (Strothman 1953). The Karbala paradigm also provides recognition of the
systemic difference between Shia and Sunni understandings, as not so much an expression
of partisan struggle of succession after the Prophet but as an act of faith, an utterance or an
enactment of solidarity that bears witness to the perceived injustices against the people of
the party of Ali (Fischer 1980).
7
The importance of memory, in studying communities structured around commemorative
ceremonies around which community identities and personhood is forged, needs to
be emphasised here. It is important to note that studying collective remembrance is at one
level a study of representation or the symbolic, even though collective memory claims to
commemorate the original event as authentic, but is in its practice highly mediated deriving
mnemonically from the original event while continuing to be re-constituted within the
framework of Shiism.
8
This local rendition of the ideal can be read through the framework of collective
memory that as Maurice Halbwachs describes exists both within the present of its
enactment as well as outside time. For collective memory is located outside time as a
cognitive relation between ideas and propositions about behaviour, individual, society and
religion. It is at the same time situated in the present in relation to processes of historical
and cultural traditions of embedding groups and individuals in specific contexts. Leading
from this Halbwachs argues that collective memory is by nature multiple yet specific,
collective, plural, and yet individual for there are as many social memories possible as
there are groups (Halbwachs 1992).
9
Veena Das in a recent article describes moral failure in everyday life and its trance-like
qualities, by exploring Muslim self-perceptions of collective weakness of their community
in proximity with the Hindu other as shaping notions of moral perfectionism. The sense
of moral burden, Das argues, is about the particular experience of time in which Muslims
experience the present as decline and as a result of their creation, imbuing in themselves
a moral disquiet. This is different from the Hindu experience of moral decline, which
she reads as a kind of natural history of morality embedded in the nature of time itself,
characterised by the understanding of the contemporary as kaliyuga as the age of moral
decline (Das2010). However, my ethnography differs from making distinctions regarding
the particular experience of time as differing in relation to distinct communities and their
everyday theologies, showing, in fact, that ideas of the natural movement of time as opposed
to a progressive movement of time differ as varied theologies within a single community.
10
In anthropology, for instance, the construction of historical calendrical time is posited
as the time of progress that is antithetical to the cyclical and static time of tradition. Clifford
Geertz, for instance, argues for two kinds of time in the context of the Balinese: ritualised time
IV
Ethnography of decline
Decline of dargahs
that takes place in a motionless present without duration and a second non-ritual mundane
time that is concerned with pragmatic activities, such as agriculture and politics in which
duration is universally recognised (Geertz (1966) 1973). In making this division between ritual
and mundane time, Geertz furthers a Malinowskian conception of culture, as rule-governed
and homogeneous, that socially transmits cognition by perpetuating itself through public
expression of an ideological past. This theory was based on a structuralist social cognition
of rules, transmitted from one generation to another, according to which different cultures
operate with different systems of thought and experiences of time. This idea of ritual time was
socially derived as culturally variable in different cultures and societiesand challenged by
Maurice Bloch, for instance, who drew on ideas from Wittgensteins zoology to argue that if
anthropologists were to understand another culture and make sense of ritual time they must
at a fundamental level apprehend time in the same way (Bloch 1977: 283). Bloch critiques
the idea of cultural time by questioning the social determination of cognition and its emphasis
on the reproduction of a social system as failing to explain how change and conflict takes place
within ritual culture. It does not explain, for instance, why peasant conflict occurs if all actors
are located within the social. For this leaves actors with no language to talk about society
since they can only talk within it (ibid.). In response, Bloch concludes that social change can
occur because the pragmatic past acts as a different conceptual sources for challenging the
ritualised, static past. In doing so, Bloch creates inter-linkages between pragmatic and ritual
past, seeing the two as distinct but as deriving from the other allowing for debate, revision
and contestations within ritual time (Appadurai 1981).
11
The dargah is also called badi bargah or the big court complex, perhaps referring to
bigger fields it was once part of.
12
The river Euphrates has a mystical place in the Islamic cosmology, being the site where
the martyrdom of the grandson of the Prophet Imam Hussain took place in 680 ad.
13
Dreams hold a special significance in establishing the efficacy of objects and spaces. The
appearance of the martyrs of Karbala in a dream acts as divine communication, in response to
which the person discovers ritual objects in a foretold spot that establishes an efficacy around
the object and the location. Katherine Ewing describes dreams in the context of Muslim
Pakistan as spiritual initiation to resolve conflicts, constituting social realities in particular
cultures. Unlike Freuds emphasis on the latent meaning of dreams as significations of a
persons past, she argues, dreams manifest and replicate a cultural template. This for Ewing
expresses a semiotic model of the self, an ongoing experience of the self of which a person
is only unconsciously aware and whose reflections converts dreams into self-representation
that holds possibilities for future transformation (Ewing 1997). For more on dreaming
in Islamic traditions, see Green (2003), Taneja (2012) and Zaman (2015).
reached their rightful destination and promised them a high moral station
(muqam) that can be surpassed by no king. To attain this, it was prophesised
that her forefathers should return to the Euphrates, perform acts of piety
till they are able to feel the fragrance of the river when divine knowledge
will be bestowed to them.
For more than five years they returned to live near the Euphrates in states
of moral cleanliness (ghusl), till they received sacred offering (tabarruk) of
three relics from the battle of Karbalaa piece of the original armour of
Imam Abbas, a piece of Imam Qasims original spear and a part of Imam
Hussains headgear in the shape of a moon and a star. These spiritual
offerings were brought to Golconda. The Imam in the dream foretold of
a place with flowing water and banyan trees as the site to institute the
relics. Syedas forefathers walked the forest around Golconda looking for
a sign, as prophesied by the Imam. At a distance from Golconda they were
struck by the sight of flowing water (chashma). Her forefathers then saw
a large banyan tree near the river, installed the relics and thus the famous
dargah came into being at a distance from the River Musi.
The dargah was known to heal and protect the inhabitants of the city,
irrespective of religion, caste or age. For this honour, Syedas ancestors
received royal recognition by the Qutub Shahis and were endowed with
land (jagir) around the dargah, drum and pipe (naubat), royal standard
(mahimaratib) as well as a royal umbrella. The area of Dewan Deodi
where you stand today once belonged to us, since a time when this area
was a jungle covered in thick canopy of banyan trees, Syeda lamented.
Gradually, the family lost the landsome appropriated by the Salar
Jung family, some squandered and some seized by the Indian government
after the forced accession of the princely state of Hyderabad to the newly
independent Indian territories. The family filed cases in the court contesting
their claims to the property and Syeda dismissed these attempts in their
capacity to yield returns, with a remark that much money and time has
been lost by her family. Instead, she dwelled on a curse that she believed
inflicted her family for the past eight generations, where the birth of boy
child leads to the death of the father, annihilating the possibility of a male
heir. Syeda herself was unable to conceive, combining her loss with the
loss of dargah land in an abortive line of descent.
The lineage of depreciation included the loss of value for an ecology of
healingwhere standards, holy water, prayers, prophesy and dreams are no
longer regarded as actual instruments of healing and cure. She referred to,
Similar to Syedas loss of dargah land and the weakening value of ritual
healing, other Shias I met described a loss of support systems when
feudal networks collapsed after the downfall of the Shia elite. Since the
application of the Jagirdari Abolition Regulation in 1949 in particular,
landowning families lost the income they received from their landholdings
(jagir). The family of Nawab Hashim Nawaz Jung Bahadur, like many
nawabs of Hyderabad at the time, was left with depleted estates without
14
In a recent introduction on corruption, Naveeda Khan (2015) explores the experience
of corruption as emblematic of civilisational decline or social decay. Drawing from
Stanley Cavells reading of Spengler and Wittgenstein, she reflects on the rise and decline
of cultures as being placed less in history in the sense of human/world history and more
natural history as biological/organic. In doing so, she makes a case for culture as living
in a temporal world that is involved in the common destiny of mortality (1988: 41).
The argument is made from the perspective of the everyday, its residual marks on bodies
and moral imagination, from which perceptions of corruption are seen as inflected by the
biological life course of humans and the perceived mortality of cultures and civilisations
rendered as physical objects prone to decay within the landscape of history. This move of
placing culture within the natural world, away from the social determination of culture,
shifts the debate on society and culture as processes embedded in neither historical time
of continual change nor of fixed structure of timeless social perpetuation. Culture then is
seen as ontologically contiguous with the larger environment that takes a natural course
of growth, decline, death and maybe even rebirth.
15
Following this argument, one could think of cultures, as Bhrighupati Singh suggests,
as waxing and waning through relations of force and contract at varying thresholds of life
(Singh 2015: 55). Singh has shown that cultures mature and decline like life, guided by a
combination of relations of force and contract, both political and mythological in nature.
Moral decline
a stall for the first time during Muharram. This was part of the cityscape
when stalls lined the roads of the old city to serve water, play sermons
and laments on loudspeakers as part of the two months of commemorat-
ing the battle of Karbala. Unlike the interaction in traditional stalls that
mediate tradition, by distributing cups of water, play eulogies or distribute
pamphlets with schedules of gatherings (majlis), the Tanzeem stall me-
diated tradition through CDs, DVDs, films and T-shirts with a message
Muharram against terrorism. They sold sermons by Shia preachers from
Pakistan trained in Iran, on CDs and DVDs. They also circulated pamphlets
on Shiism, focusing particularly on Shia politics in the Middle East.
They sought to adopt a model of intervention that they believed would
strengthen the community from within, both in matters of faith (deen) and
secular education (duniya). Tanzeem also ran a coaching centre, where
members career-counselled and coached Shia students from economically
disadvantaged contexts, particularly from Hyderabads old city where a
substantial population of the Shia urban poor reside. In addition, Tanzeem
organised forums for public discussion and debate, including an Islamic quiz
through mobile phones, which entailed a prize for the first right SMS.
Through conversations with them, I found that Tanzeem was a move-
ment that began through an Islamic self-study circle they refer to as QSC
(Quran study circles). The group was started by Twelver (a sect of Shiism
based on the path of succession of the Imams) Shia clerics trained in the
hawza (university for learning in Islamic sciences) in Qom (Iran), with
a vision to re-think the local Shia community in the old city. This model
of self-engagement with the holy texts was the basis for this reformist
imagination. The imagination was derived from a larger Islamic reformist
ethos of self-study, which involved an engagement with Islam to establish
the true and correct understanding of traditional beliefs and practices,
that Eickelman and Piscatori have termed objectification (Eickelman
1992: 643), and which Lara Deeb has also termed as a process of seek-
ing authentication in Islamic ritual practices (Deeb 2006: 8). Tanzeem,
publicly circulated images of a global Shia imagery that broadly espoused
a shift from praxis (practice) or orthopraxy towards logos (reason) or
orthodoxy, by calling into being a reflexive consciousness in engaging
with questions like What is my religion, Why is it important to my life
and How do my beliefs guide my conduct (Eickelman and Piscatori
2004). QSC forums were hence a platform to engage with religion under
supervision of those formally trained. It sought an underlying reason and
16
This continuity between history, memory and ritual performance does not presume
them as fundamentally opposed domains. This is different in ways history and memory
are understood, by Pierre Nora, for instance, where memory is emotional, spontaneous,
unselfconscious and provides an organic link between the present and traditions of the
past. History, on the other hand, is narrow, intellectual, linear and causal, and considers
the present to be disconnected from the past by the force of historical change. History,
then, according to Nora, works at the plane of representation (Nora 1989). It is intellectual,
authoritative and absolutist. Memory, on the other hand, is in the realm of tradition, in
concrete gestures and spaces of the everyday and is most importantly affective and
magical. These boundaries are blurred in modern societies, he argues, in sites such as
national rituals, state memorials and public symbols like the flag as having replaced sites
of memory in which living memory once existed. This living memory, which once lived
in the warmth of tradition and the silence of custom is eradicated and annihilated,
he bemoans, in the acceleration of history that provides an authoritative version of the
past. While Ashis Nandy counters Noras differentiation between history and memory,
by looking at the multitudes living outside history in that they have living theories of
the past that is important and shapes their present and future, in myths and folk tales
but is different from the historical consciousness of historians. For Nandy, historical
consciousness is inextricably associated with the project of conquest, the nation-state, its
secular worldviews and scientific rationality. The major difference between those living
in history and those living outside it, he argues, is in myths which are morality tales that
predominantly organise experiences of the past through, what he calls the principle of
principled forgetfulness (Nandy 1995: 47). For Nandy, the two, history and memory,
are incompatible, since historical consciousness cannot take morality and forgetfulness
seriously due to its foundational empiricism. Therefore, any attempt to bring the two in
conversation, that is, the mythological in contact with the historical, is destructive because
once you own history, it begins to own you (ibid.: 45). What one sees here, in ways the
memory of the inaugural loss is read as part of historical rationality, not just dissolves
differences between history and memory but opens up the possibility of recovering tradition
and infusing temporal coherence within ritualism as primitive non-rational action.
Linking ritual with a transcendental reason, the sermon saw the practices
of self-flagellation as deviating from this purpose. The reason for this, it
provided, is the changed political context, where Islam is associated with
violence since the declaration of the war on terror on the Muslim world,
making people enemies of Islam and enemies of the Shias. Given the
present state of political failing, the sermon pleaded for a reform of ritual-
ism that deploys reason as a method of propagation.
Today, more than ever, this is very important, for today Islam is weak
and today Muslims are weak. You see, all acts of worship have a
purpose, and the purpose of these acts is the unity of Muslims. Why
do we read namaz? Because its purpose is unity; collective namaz has
multiple blessings. What is the purpose of fasting (roza)? It is unity.
What is the purpose of hajj? That Muslims unite. Beyond unity there
is nothing. Even today if we take Hussains name and unite, surely we
can become superpowers in the world.
This return is made possible by enacting ritual acts such as prayer, fasting
and the payment of Islamic tax as part of manifestations of the transcen-
dental reason, that is, justice and love for the oppressed (mazloom) and
hatred for oppression (zulm). In doing so, the sermon recalled the original
loss as a paradigm of justice that the Tanzeem activist would argue returns
the political to the religious, revoking discourses of the colonial state that
sought to delimit a formal sphere of politics by purporting a separation
of a religiously informed domestic sphere as well as a secular colonial
domain (Jalal 2000: 37).
The sermon generated much opposition that year. The Tanzeem stall
was vandalised, posters of Khamenei were torn and the activists were
arrested. However, the public engagement with the debate around the
practice of qama-zani unbridled counter reasons in support of the practice.
Counter reasons supporting qama-zani bordered on community self-
expression and love for the Imams. Paradoxically, those who supported
qama-zani also drew upon loss and the decline of Muslim civilisations, for
they viewed Tanzeems moves to curb qama-zani as the prototype of fitna
or a time of oppression that characterised the period after the Prophets
death. They also viewed Islam as under siege and Muslims all over as
weak, as characterised by the time of oppression or fitna and argued that
flagellating as a means of expressing love and support for the martyrs
needs to be upheld and valourised as a struggle for self and community
expression within this time. The defenders of qama-zani perceived moral
loss as a natural sequence of time after the Propheta time characterised
by disquietude and oppression that is illustrated by efforts to curtail the
expression of love for the family of the Prophet.
V
Conclusion
Bruno Latour reminds us that the preoccupation with tradition and
the interpretation of tradition as an age-old ritual is a distinctly modern
tendency, born out of the anxiety about the vanishing past (Latour 1993).
Communities on the margins of modernity can be seen to emphasise and
display their tradition through what Bourdieu calls the excesses of symbolic
capital in performing their identity as practices that preserve their agency
(Bourdieu 1986). The agency of the colonised modern subject, through
community memory, is sought to be recovered by reworking tradition,
17
It is possible here to think of time as constituted by both history and tradition. I have
in mind what Dipesh Chakrabarty, describes as part of the difficulties of writing a secular
history, where modern historical consciousness takes into account a notion of time in
which Gods, spirits, or the supernatural have agency in the world (Chakrabarty 1997: 35).
Chakrabarty explores this contradiction in the Marxist category of commodity through the
problem of temporality, where a bifurcation is made possible within the category of labour
itselfbetween real labour as belonging to the world of heterogeneity and its multiple
temporalities of transcendental time or non-durational time as well as abstract labour as
a general labour category that imposes homogeneity on abstract individuals. Through the
Derridean notion of trace as that which cannot be enclosed and that which challenges capital,
Chakravarty concludes that capital exists with the residual. He, therefore, sees within capital
the temporally multiple, through which possibilities of reading history and memory as a
continuum can be opened.
Acknowledgements
This article is part of my doctoral dissertation submitted to the School of Oriental and African
Studies, Department of Anthropology and Sociology. It was written as part of the Visiting
Research Fellowship at Zentrum Moderner Orient (ZMO) and Berlin Graduate School
Muslim Cultures and Societies (BGSMCS). The Charles Wallace India Trust, Haimendorf
Fellowship, Central Research Fund, SOAS Postgraduate Additional Fieldwork Award, as
well as the Indian Council of Social Science Research fellowship funded the research. I am
truly indebted to my supervisors, Stephen Hughes and Edward Simpson, for their contribution
to the research. I am also grateful to Magnus Marsden, Mukulika Banerjee, Faisal Devji,
Daud Ali and Caroline Osella for their intellectual generosity and critical commentary on
the research. Thank you to the faculty and colleagues at Centre for the Study of Culture and
Society as well as Sarai-Centre for the Study of Developing Societies for offering me the
independent fellowship to begin work on Muharram in Hyderabad. My gratitude to Lawrence
Liang, Shail Mayaram, Deepak Mehta, Mushirul Hasan, Shuddhabrata Sengupta and Naveen
Thayyil, who has partnered and helped me navigate my way through a complex terrain.
I thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers at the Contributions to Indian Sociology
for their insightful reading of the article, useful correctives and editorial help. I would like
to dedicate this article to my informants and my entire family in Hyderabad, particularly
my grandmother who lived her losses as virtues.
REFERENCES
Appadurai, Arjun. 1981. The Past as a Scarce Resource. Man 16 (2): 20119.
Attewell, Guy. 2010. Interweaving Substance Trajectories: Tiryaq, Circulation and
Therapeutic Transformation in the Nineteenth Century. In Crossing Colonial
Historiographies: Histories of Colonial and Indigenous Medicines in Transnational
Perspective, edited by Anne Digby, Waltroud Ernst and Projit B. Mukharji, 120.
Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Banerjee, Prathama. 2002. Re-presenting Pasts: Santals in Nineteenth-century Bengal.
In History and the Present, edited by Partha Chatterjee and Anjan Ghosh, 17599.
New Delhi: Permanent Black.
. 2006a. Politics of Time: Primitives and History-writing in a Colonial Society.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Banerjee, Prathama. 2006b. Culture/Politics: The irresoluble double-bind of the Indian
Adivasi. The Indian Historical Review 33 (1): 99126.
Barnett, S.A. 1973. The Process of Withdrawal in a South Indian Caste. In Entrepreneurship
and Modernization of Occupational Cultures in South Asia, edited by Milton Singer,
179204. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bawa, Vasant Kumar. 1987. Indian Metropolis: Urbanisation, Planning and Management.
New Delhi: Inter India Publications.
Beeman, William O. 1993. The Anthropology of Theatre and Spectacle. Annual Review
of Anthropology 22 (1993): 36993.
Bloch, Maurice. 1977. The Past and the Present in the Present. Man 12 (2): 27892.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for
the Sociology of Education, edited by John G. Richardson, 24158. Westport, CT:
Greenwood Press.
Boym, Svetlana. 2010. The Future of Nostalgia. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Cavell, Stanley. 1988. Declining Decline: Wittgenstein as a Philosopher of Culture. Inquiry
31 (3): 25364.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 1997. The Time of History and the Times of Gods. In The Politics
of Culture in the Shadow of Capital, edited by Lisa Lowe and David Lloyd, 3560.
Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
Dabashi, Hamid. 2000. The End of Islamic Ideology. Social Research 67 (2): 475518.
Das, Veena. 2010. Moral and Spiritual Striving in the Everyday: To be a Muslim in
Contemporary India. In Ethical Life in South Asia, edited by Anand Pandian and Daud
Ali, 23253. Bloomington, Indiana, US: Indiana University Press.
Deeb, Lara. 2006. An Enchanted Modern: Gender and Public Piety in Shii Lebanon.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
. 2007. Lebanese Shia Women: Temporality and Piety. ISIM Review 18 (Autumn):
3233.
Eickelman, Dale F. 1992. Mass Higher Education and the Religious Imagination in
Contemporary Arab Societies. American Ethnologist 19 (4): 64355.
Eickelman, Dale F. and James Piscatori. 2004. Muslim Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Ewing, Katherine Pratt. 1997. Arguing Sainthood: Modernity, Psychoanalysis, and Islam.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Fabian, Johannes. 1983. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New
York: Columbia University Press.
Fischer, Michael M.J. 1980. Iran: From Religious Dispute to Revolution. Madison, WI:
University of Wisconsin Press.
Fox, R.G. 1984. Urban Class and Communal Consciousness in Colonial Punjab: The Genesis
of Indias Intermediate Regime. Modern Asian Studies 18 (3): 45989.
Geertz, Clifford. (1966) 1973. Person, Time and Conduct in Bali. In The Interpretation of
Cultures, 360411. New York: Basic Books.
Giles-Vernick, Tamara. 2000. Doli: Translating an African Environmental History of Loss
in the Sangha River Basin of Equatorial Africa. Journal of African History 41 (3):
37394.
Green, Nile. 2003. The Religious and Cultural Roles of Dreams and Visions in Islam.
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 13 (3): 287313.
. 2011. Bombay Islam: The Religious Economy of the West Indian Ocean, 18401915.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halbwachs, Maurice. 1992. On Collective Memory. Edited and translated by Lewis.
A.Coser. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hann, C.M. 1998. Introduction: The Embeddedness of Property. In Property Relations:
Renewing the Anthropological Tradition, edited by C.M. Hann, 147. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Hansen, Thomas Blom. 2012. Melancholia of Freedom: Social Life in an Indian Township
in South Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hegland, Mary Elaine. 1983. Two Images of Husain: Accommodation and Revolution in an
Iranian Village. In Religion and Politics in Iran: Shiism from Quietism to Revolution,
edited by Nikki R. Keddie, 21835. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
. 1998a. The Power Paradox in Muslim Womens Majales: North-West Pakistani
Mourning Rituals as Sites of Contestation over Religious Politics, Ethnicity, and
Gender. Signs 23 (2): 391428.
. 1998b. Flagellation and Fundamentalism: (Trans)forming Meaning, Identity, and
Gender through Pakistani Womens Rituals of Mourning. American Ethnologist
25 (2): 24066.
Jalal, Ayesha. 2000. Self and Sovereignty: Individual and Community in South Asian Islam
Since 1850. London and New York: Routledge.
Khan, Naveeda. 2015. The Fate of Our Corruption: An Introductory Note. Contributions
to Indian Sociology 49 (3): 287304.
Kirsch, Stuart. 2001. Lost Worlds: Environmental Disaster, Culture Loss, and the Law.
Current Anthropology 42 (2): 16798.
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter.
Cambridge, MA and London: Cambridge University Press.
Luhrmann, T.M. 1994. The Good Parsi: The Postcolonial Feminization of a Colonial
Elite. Man 29 (2): 33357.
Marshall, Sahlins. 1983. Other Times, Other Customs: The Anthropology of History.
American Anthropologist 85 (3): 51744.
Munn, Nancy D. 1992. The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A Critical Essay. Annual
Review of Anthropology 21 (1992): 93123.
Naidu, Ratna. 1990. Old Cities, New Predicaments: A Study of Hyderabad. New Delhi:
SAGE Publications.
Naidu, Ratna and Kamalakar, J. 1988. Communal Conflict in the Old City of Hyderabad.
Social Action 38 (4): 34451.
Nandy, A. 1995. Historys Forgotten Doubles. History and Theory 34 (2): 4466.
Nora, Pierre. 1989. Between Memory and History: Les Lieux des Memoire. Representations
26 (Special Issue: Memory and Counter-memory): 725.
Olwig, Karen F. and Hastrup, Kirsten, eds. 1997. Siting Culture: The Shifting Anthropological
Object. London and New York: Routledge.
Pinault, David. 1999. Shia Lamentation Rituals and Reinterpretations of the Doctrine of
Intercession: Two Cases from Modern India. History of Religions 38 (3): 285305.
Ramaswamy, Sumathi. 2004. The Lost Land of Lemuria: Fabulous Geographies, Catastrophic
Histories. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Read, Peter. 1996. Returning to Nothing: The Meaning of Lost Places. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Rose, Deborah Bird. 1996. Nourishing Terrains: Australian Aboriginal Views of Landscape
and Wilderness. Canberra: Australian Heritage Commission.
Seshan, K.S.S., ed. 1993. Hyderabad400: Saga of a City. Hyderabad: Association of
British Council Scholars.
Simone, AbdouMaliq. 2004. For the City Yet to Come: Changing African Life in Four Cities.
Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
Singh, Bhrigupati. 2015. Poverty and the Quest for Life: Spiritual and Material Striving in
Contemporary Rural India. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Skaria, Ajay. 1999. Hybrid Histories: Forests, Frontiers and Wildness in Western India.
New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Strathern, M. 1999. The Aesthetics of Substance. In Property, Substance, and Effect:
Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things, 4564. London: Athlone Press.
Strothmann, R. 1953. Taziyah. In Shorter Encyclopaedia of Islam, edited by H. A. R.
Gibb and J. H. Kramers, 59091. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Taneja, Anand Vivek. 2012. Saintly Visions: Other Histories and Historys Others in the
Medieval Ruins of Delhi. The Indian Economic and Social History Review 49 (4):
557590.
Zaman, Taymiya R. 2015. Nostalgia, Lahore, and the Ghost of Aurangzeb. Fragments
4 (2015): 127.