Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract: The primary purpose of this study was to examine the effects of video modeling delivered via computer
on accurate and independent use of an iPod by three participants with moderate intellectual disabilities. In the
context of combined multiple probes across participants and replicated across tasks, three female middle school
students learned to watch a movie, listen to music, and look at photos on an iPod. Video clips were created in
point of view, as if participants were performing the task and presented via video modeling on an IBM
computer. During instruction, participants watched the videos of the entire task they were currently learning.
In addition to data on accuracy of responding, data were also collected on efficiency measures (number of
sessions and number and percentage of errors to criterion), as well as on types of errors (latency, duration, and
topographic). Results indicate that participants acquired the response following video modeling and could
independently use the iPod. Students maintained most tasks on follow-up probe trials; however, on skills that
deteriorated, students were effectively retrained with video booster sessions.
It is well documented that systematic response learning or learning skills by watching others
prompting procedures have successfully been perform those skills. Literature exist that sup-
used to teach participants with a variety of ports participants with intellectual disabilities
diagnoses functional skills (Collins, Gast, Wol- have the ability to learn functional skills
ery, Holcombe, & Leatherby, 1991; Hughes, through observational learning (Clark, Kehle,
Schuster, & Nelson, 1993; Schoen, Lentz, & Jenson, & Beck, 1992; Farmer, Gast, Wolery, &
Suppa, 1988), including how to use technol- Winterling, 1991; Gast, Doyle, Wolery, Ault, &
ogy (Mechling & Cronin, 2006; Mechling, Baklarz, 1991; Griffen, Wolery, & Schuster,
Gast, & Barthold, 2004). However, there is 1992). Most often this learning has occurred
growing extant literature on the use of video during small group instruction with live mod-
instruction for functional skills, trying to inte- els. It can be argued that video instruction,
grate technology and systematic response i.e., the presentation of a model via video,
prompting procedures (Mechling, 2004; provides another opportunity for participants
Mechling & Cronin; Mechling & Gast, 2003; to learn through observation, in contrast to
Norman, Collins, & Schuster, 2001). One of live demonstration.
the theoretical foundations of video instruc-
Mechling (2005) in her review of personally
tion relates to observational learning (Ban-
created instructional video programs outlined
dura, 1969, 1977). Bandura discusses stu-
the benefits of video technology, stating video
dents ability to engage in observational
offers an opportunity for participants to view
the same model as often as necessary (Grice &
Blampied, 1994), can be used by a variety of
Correspondence concerning this article should
instructors (Charlop-Christy, Le, & Freeman,
be addressed to Diana L. Hammond, Department of
Communication Sciences and Special Education,
2002), can be available outside the classroom
University of Georgia, 516 Aderhold Hall, Athens, and is potentially cost-efficient when compared
GA 30602. Phone: 770-401-3598; E-mail: dianah@ to in-vivo training (Branham, Collins, Schuster,
uga.edu & Kleinert, 1999). Ayres and Langone (2005)
Participant Descriptions
Gender F F F
Special Education Eligibility MOID MOID/SIa MOID/SIa
IQ 45b 52b 44c
ABAS (GAC)d 65 65 49
Age 14 yrs 2 mon 12 yrs 8 mon 14 yrs 11 mon
Grade 8th 6th 8th
Years in Special Education 9 9 4
Ethnicity African-American African-American Hispanic
Free or Reduced Lunch Yes No Yes
Medication No No No
Note: All students were in Grade 8 and were classified as having learning disabilities.
(a) SI: Speech Impairment; (b) Differential Ability Scales (Harcourt Assessment, Inc., 2007); (c) Wechsler
Intelligence Scale for Children IV (Wechsler, 2003); (d) Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (Harrison &
Oakland, 2000), General Adaptive Composite
iPod, (f) imitate steps of tasks analysis, (g) on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Chil-
regularly attend school with one or fewer ab- dren IV (WISC-IV; Wechsler, 2003), which was
sences in the 2 weeks prior to the study, and administered in Spanish, since English was
(h) match to sample the words movies, vid- her second language. During leisure, Nan pre-
eos, photos, all photos music, and ferred to watch videos or play games. Nans
songs. Participants also provided verbal as- strengths included excellent focus on tasks
sent or agreement to participate and parental (i.e. rarely going off-task), assembly tasks,
permisson for participation was obtained for sorting by size and color, and sight word rec-
each participant. Participants who did not pos- ognition. Instructional needs, according to
sess all entry skills were excluded from the her IEP, included number identification, ex-
study. Refer to Table 1 for additional partici- pressive communication, and interpersonal
pant descriptors. behavior. Sally was 12 years 8 months and had
Participants chosen for the study had a a composite score of 52 on the DAS. She was
history of using visual activity schedules to identified as having a speech impairment that
structure daily tasks and transition between primarily impacted her expressive communi-
activities; however, participants required cation. During leisure, Sally would prefer to
prompting to use their schedules effectively. interact with an adult or play on the com-
Participants were unable to transition between puter. Strengths for Sally included matching,
activities and engaged in high rates of aber- filing by number and first letter, locating
rant behaviors instead of chosen leisure activ- items in the community and receptive com-
ities. Beth was 14 years 2 months, and had a munication. None of the participants had pre-
composite score of 45 on the Differential Abil- vious exposure to video modeling for instruc-
ity Scales assessment (DAS; Harcourt Assess- tional purposes. In addition, participants had
ment, Inc., 2007). During leisure, Beth en- never used iPods for instructional or recre-
joyed puzzles, video, playing on the computer, ational purposes; however, this is an age-ap-
and painting her nails. Beths strengths in- propriate leisure activity.
cluded tasks such as filing by first letter, read-
ing basic sight words, and navigating the
Settings and Arrangements
school independently. Weaknesses included
locating items in the community and counting Individual probe trials and intervention ses-
money. The second participant, Nan, was 14 sions took place four times per week in a
years 11 months and had a full scale IQ of 44 self-contained classroom (32 ft 26 ft), dur-
1. Press green center button to 1. Press green center button to 1. Press green center button to
turn the iPod on. turn the iPod on. turn the iPod on.
2. Wait for menu screen to 2. Wait for menu screen to 2. Wait for menu screen to
appear. appear. appear.
3. Put thumb on menu 3. Make sure Music is 3. Put thumb on menu button.
button. highlighted in blue. 4. Scroll clockwise until the word
4. Scroll clockwise until the 4. Press green button to select Photos is highlighted in
word Videos is highlighted Music. blue.
in blue. 5. Scroll clockwise until the word 5. Press green button with thumb
5. Press green button with Songs is highlighted in blue. to open Photos menu.
thumb to open Videos 6. Press green button to open 6. Press green button again with
menu. Songs menu. thumb to open All Photos
6. Press green button again 7. Put thumb on play button. menu.
with thumb to open 8. Press play button to start 7. Put thumb on play button.
Movies menu. music. 8. Press play button to start
7. Put thumb on menu 9. When song is finished, press photo slideshow.
button. and hold play/pause button 9. Watch slideshow and wait until
8. Scroll clockwise until task for 2 s to shut iPod off. photo show is finished.
movie is highlighted in blue. 10. Hand iPod to teacher. 10. When photo show is finished,
9. Press green button with press and hold play/pause
thumb to start movie. button for 2 s to shut iPod off.
10. Watch movie and wait until 11. Hand iPod to teacher.
movie is finished.
11. Press and hold play/pause
button for 2 s to shut iPod
off.
12. Hand iPod to teacher.
within 15 s of initiation, or (c) completed the nance probe trials to assist in completing tar-
step incorrectly or out of sequence (Mechling get behaviors. Adult prompts were monitored
& Ortega-Hurdon, 2007). An incorrect re- using event recording and incorporated into
sponse was also scored according to the type procedural reliability. Each time an adult pro-
of error: (a) latency errors (L), no initiation vided a verbal prompt (telling a participant
within 15 s of either task direction or comple- what to do), a model (showing a participant
tion of prior step in task analysis; (b) duration what to do), or a partial or full physical
errors (D), task analysis step not completed prompt (hand over hand assisting a partici-
within 15 s; and (c) topography errors (T), as pant through task analysis step), a tally mark
incorrectly completing behavioral response or was recorded on the data sheet.
performing steps in the task analysis out of
order from teaching or task sequence. After
General Procedure
task completion, percentage of steps com-
pleted accurately and independently was cal- Individual sessions were conducted four times
culated by dividing the number of steps accu- weekly with each participant. Each session
rately and independently completed by the lasted between 1520 min, including video
total number of steps in the task analysis and modeling during intervention probe trials.
multiplying by 100. Natural reinforcement procedures, access to
No adult verbal, model, partial or full phys- the selected movie, song, or photos, were held
ical prompt was to occur during initial probe constant across all conditions and no addi-
trials, video modeling sessions, or mainte- tional preferred items or activities were pro-
Social Validity Questionnaire: Mean Score and Range for each Question
professionals, special education teachers, eling (3.4) were lower with most respondents
therapists, and significant others. Specifically, reporting an agree or no opinion.
social validity data were collected on: (a) the
identified behavior was important to increase
for the participant; (b) questions regarding Results
the research were answered in a prompt man-
ner and to my satisfaction; (c) the outcomes, Effectiveness of Video Modeling
increase participants ability to navigate/use
Movies. Figure 1 presents data on the per-
iPod, were significant to the participant; (d)
centage of steps completed accurately and in-
the participant became more independent as
dependently for Beth, Sally, and Nan. Navigat-
a result of instruction; (e) I now believe the
ing to movies is represented by an open
participant is able to learn from video model-
square (), navigating to music is represented
ing; (f) I believe video modeling was solely
by an open triangle () and navigating to
responsible for the participants learning; and photos is represented by an open circle ().
(g) my opinions about using video modeling Initial Probe trial data were collected on all
for instruction purposes have changed. Data tasks during the first three sessions of the
were summed and averaged and the range/ study for all participants. Introduction of
mean scores were reported for each question video modeling was staggered across partici-
for each participant. Table 3 presents the pants, which allowed additional Initial Probe
mean score for each question, for each partic- trial data to be collected for Sally during ses-
ipant. A total of 5 respondents per participant sion 15 and for Nan during sessions 15 and 31.
provided social validity feedback. Mean rat- All participants demonstrated 0% indepen-
ings related to effectiveness of intervention dent responding during Initial Probe trials for
(4.1) and practical application of video mod- all target behaviors. Video modeling instruc-
tion was implemented with Beth during ses- crease in responding to 83%. Similar to Beth,
sion 4, session 16 for Sally, and session 32 for Sally increased independent responding for
Nan. Upon introduction of video modeling to navigating to music (20%) and photos (45%),
the first behavior, selecting movies, partici- indicating similar steps between the three task
pants required 3, 3, and 5 Pre-Video Modeling analyses generalized. Nan maintained 100%
Probe trials before an increase in correct per- responding for navigating to movies and in-
formance was observed. During Post-Video creased responding for navigating to music
Modeling Probe trials, the addition of a verbal (20%) and photos (27%) during her Mainte-
prompt (You can go ahead) only on the first nance Probe trial (session 47). An increase in
target behavior (selecting movies) was neces- navigating to music and photo responding
sary after participants responding remained at prior to video modeling instruction can be
0% for three consecutive days. During Post- attributed to the overlap in steps across the
Video Modeling trials for navigating to music three task analyses. Four steps across tasks
and photos, participants were provided only were identical.
with the task direction and initiated the task Music. Data on the percentage of steps
without needing the verbal prompt. completed independently for navigating to
Criterion was mastered in 11 sessions for music are also presented on Figure 1, denoted
Beth and 15 sessions for Sally and Nan. Mean by an open triangle. All participants demon-
number of sessions to acquisition was 13.6. strated 0% accurate responding for navigating
Beth maintained 100% responding (session to music during Initial Probe trials. Upon in-
15) for navigating to movies and increased troduction of video modeling, 5, 14, and 12
responding for both navigating to music sessions (Mean 10.3 sessions) were required
(40%) and photos (45%). Sally had difficulty for Beth, Sally, and Nan, respectively to ac-
navigating to movies (session 31), with a de- quire the target behavior. Beth maintained
Video Boost
Initial Probe Video Modeling Maintenance Sessions
Total
L D T L D T L D T L D T Errors
Beth
Movie 3 0 0 5 0 4 0 0 0 12
Music 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 13
Photos 3 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 7
Total Errors 9 0 3 5 0 9 0 0 3 0 0 3 32
Sally
Movie 4 0 0 5 0 8 0 0 3 20
Music 4 0 1 1 0 11 0 0 2 0 0 0 19
Photos 4 0 2 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 3 18
Total Errors 12 0 3 6 0 27 0 0 6 0 0 3 57
Nan
Movie 5 0 0 6 0 7 0 0 0 18
Music 5 0 1 2 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 5 22
Photos 7 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 14
Total Errors 17 0 1 9 0 21 0 0 1 0 0 5 54
Total Errors* 38 0 7 20 0 57 0 0 10 0 0 11 143
Mean Percentage**
Movie 32% 0% 0% 80% 0% 33% 0% 0% 30% 0% 0% 0% 35%
Music 32% 0% 43% 15% 0% 39% 0% 0% 60% 0% 0% 73% 38%
Photos 36% 0% 57% 5% 0% 28% 0% 0% 10% 0% 0% 27% 27%
Key: (L) Latency Errors; (D) Duration Errors; (T) Topographical Errors;
* Represents total number of errors across all participants for each error type and condition; ** Rep-
resents mean percentage of error type across all participants for each condition for each target behavior;
Data not collected because condition was not implemented for participant.