Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Vector is a concept used widely in the field of physics. A quantity such as
velocity, which has directions as well as magnitude, is a vector quantity. Other
quantities that are also vectors are displacement, force and momentum.
Vectors are fundamental in studying further in any topics in physics because
various ways of solving problems and quantities
Some basics knowledge of vectors applied in performing this experiment is the
addition, subtraction, in both graphical and analytical method. There are two
ways to do a graphical method: one is the tip to tail method in which we draw
a vector from the tip or head of the previous vector on paper and create a
scale relative to the magnitude of the vector, and the other is the
parallelogram method in which parallelogram is created to measure the
resultant vectors. In the analytical method, vectors are broken into their x and
y components and added correspondingly later to find the resultant vector.
Also, sine/cosine law can also be used to find the resultant vector.
In this experiment, vectors represent the force. Forces are vectors, therefore,
simply adding them as if they were scalars quantities will not give the correct
value of forces, it needs to be broken into components and added. Equilibrant
refers to the force that balances out the net force created by other forces
and create the state of equilibrium, meaning all the forces are cancelled out
and no acceleration is caused.
Materials Mass
Strings
Pin
Hook
Tips!
Experiment Set-up
2 forces
3 forces
Calculation (2)
Analytical Method
2 Forces
3 Forces
Calculation
Graphical Method
Percent Differences
Based on the results of the experiment, the values of calculated
equilibrant force and the one obtained from the experiment differs in both
cases: Calculated with analytical method and graphical method. In analytical
method, the calculated equilibrant force for the two forces experiment was
0.84 N whereas the experimental values show 0.98 N. The calculated percent
difference was 15%. The graphical method, however, shows a lesser percent
difference from the results: 8.5 % difference, with the calculated force of 0.9N
and experimental values of 0.98N. Due to this, it can be inferred that the
experimental was performed with carelessness, resulting in a considerable large
errors. Experimental errors can be caused from human errors and lack of
practice with operating with laboratory equipment.
Similarly, for the three forces part, the calculated values differ to some
extent from the experimental values. In the analytical, the calculated
equilibrant force was 2.89 N whereas the experimental values show 3.332 N. The
percentage difference between two values was 14%. Again, the graphical
method shows lesser percent difference of only 5%. The values obtained were 3
N and 3.332N for graphical calculation and experiment respectively. Also, the
errors could be caused from human errors and lack of practice with laboratory
equipment.
References
Giancoli, D. C. (1998). Physics: Principles with applications (Global ed.). Up-
per Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.