Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Improving energy
efficiency in an
ammonia plant
D. Velzquez, F. Rossi and J. Rodrguez of DVA Global Energy Services and F.Galindo of Fertiberia
present the results of an energy study carried out in an ammonia plant in Spain. A comprehensive
energy audit of the main equipment (furnaces, syngas, air and ammonia compressors, steam
turbines, cooling towers and refrigeration systems), pinch analysis and steam modelling resulted
in the proposal of 34 projects, some of which have cost savings of more than one million euros
per year with payback times of less than one year.
T
he directives 2003/87/EC and
2009/29/EC1,2 set strict CO2 emis-
sion limits for some chemical indus-
tries and can have a significant impact on
companies profits. Because of this, as well
as the increase in the price of natural gas
in recent years, many European ammonia
producers have been forced to carry out
important energy efficiency improvements,
in order to maintain their competitiveness
within the international market.
During recent years, the average spe-
cific consumption of ammonia production
has been globally quantified as 36.6 GJ/
tNH3 (LHV base). Performance indicators
of ammonia plants located in Canada and
western Europe show the best values3.
Within the most efficient regions, natu-
ral gas costs represent more than 80% of
total ammonia production costs, reaching
90% in some cases. Fertiberias ammonia plant in Spain.
Current best available technologies
for ammonia production from natural gas mal energy recovery in the process and The ammonia produced is either exported
allow specific consumption levels of about hence reduction of fuel consumption. or consumed by a urea plant located in the
28 GJ/tNH3 to be achieved4. same facility. Its utility services are also
Among the methodologies aimed at Plant description connected to a nitric acid plant. Figure 1
finding energy saving opportunities, pinch shows a simplified diagram of the process.
analysis linked to power and steam model- Process description
ling has proved to be a powerful way for The ammonia site for which this energy Energy structure
determining projects to improve the over- audit has been carried out was designed Steam reforming is an endothermic proc-
all energy efficiency of industrial sites. This to produce 1,130 t/d of ammonia, via ess, which is carried out at high tempera-
procedure has been applied successfully catalytic steam reforming of natural gas, tures. Thermal energy demand is supplied
in many industrial facilities, allowing opti- using Kellogg technology with ICI license. by a furnace located in the first reform-
air
reformer I reformer II
steam conversion
combustion CO CO2
air NG NG
aux boiler
NG
desulphurization
solution
separation
NH3
NH3 water
Fig 2: Main inlet and outlet energy flows involved in the ammonia production process
Stream Energy losses 3%
Feed (NG) 58,3% 60.2%
process
Inlet Fuel (NG) 39,8% 58.3% NH3
98.1%
Electricity 1,9% natural gas
1.9% 39.8%
total
Ammonia 60,2% energy electricity
Cooling water 25,9% combustion
ing step. This furnace is the main energy erate high pressure steam downstream of In addition to natural gas, the purge
consumer at the site, consuming more the reforming unit, as well as after the CO- stream of the synthesis loop is also used
than 70% of the overall fuel supplied to to-CO2 conversion unit, where exothermic in the fuel feed network, as it contains high
the factory. Combustion gases from this reactions take place. levels of hydrogen. Due to the exothermic
equipment are sent to a gases channel Additional high pressure steam is reaction of ammonia production, the ther-
where thermal energy is recovered through generated in an auxiliary boiler, whose mal energy contained in the ammonia
several heat exchangers that preheat proc- combustion gases are sent to the same synthesis reactor outlet stream is used to
ess streams and generate steam at differ- combustion exhaust gas channel of the preheat the boiler feed water.
ent pressure levels before gases are sent reforming furnace. The auxiliary boiler is As shown in Fig. 2, heat supplied to the
to the stack. There is no requirement for the second largest energy consumer of process through the combustion of natural
thermal energy in the second stage of the the facility, representing over 20% of total gas is subsequently recovered for steam
reformer (secondary reformer), since it is energy consumption. The third-largest production (power production) and heating
supplied by the combustion reactions pro- thermal energy consumer is the furnace combustion air and other process streams.
duced by introducing process air into the upstream of the desulphurisation reactor, Unrecovered heat is removed by cooling tow-
syngas stream. Heat recovery boilers gen- where natural gas is heated. ers and air coolers. High pressure steam is
204,8 t/h
Auxiliary boiler
Savings shown in Table 2 suggest the
500
potential for reducing natural gas con-
sumption in the boiler while maintaining the
same total steam production (229.6 t/h).
0 Load reduction in the boiler can be
0 100 200 300 400 compensated by enhancing thermal energy
enthalpy, x 000kW recovery from the process through the
installation of new heat exchangers.
The model was developed in Excel for- grand composite curves which are shown Thermal and power effects in the
mat, which makes it easy to implement in in Fig. 4. The composite curves of the proc- primary reformer
any industrial facility, and represents a fast ess represent the process energy demand All combustion gases of the plant are
and accurate calculating tool that can be (heating and cooling) versus their tempera- sent to the primary reformer gases chan-
used for economic assessment of changes tures. These curves are obtained by adding nel, where thermal recovery takes places
introcuced in the plant. The reliability of the the demand of hot streams, which need to for the heating of different streams. The
model is based on the possibility of using be cooled, and cold ones, which oppositely stack of the desulphurisation furnace is
real operating data to adjust the efficiencies need to be heated, for each temperature connected to the gases channel in the
and consumptions of each unit. Figure 3 interval. last section, affecting only air heating. It
shows the main interface of the model. In spite of the proper level of exist- is worth noting that a reduction of natural
ing energy recovery in the process, a big gas burned in the boiler and/or primary
Results potential improvement was detected by reformer will have important effects on the
means of retrofitting the existing heat performance of heat exchangers used for
Table 1 shows a summary of the main exchanger network. For the analysis, a energy recovery in this duct. The gas chan-
energy saving projects identified and minimum approach of 20C between com- nel was simulated and it was observed
assessed in the analysis. posite curves was chosen. Figure 4 shows that the exchangers most affected are the
the optimised energy recovery case, corre- boiler feed water and combustion air pre-
Pinch analysis sponding to 20C minimum approach. heaters. Since steam generation is linked
to the whole steam and power model, the
Pinch analysis allows the quantitative Potential savings global steam balance is affected once the
assessment of existing energy recovery, Table 2 shows potential savings and amount of burned natural gas is changed.
graphically represented by hot and cold objectives of energy consumption for This also affects the flow rate of high pres-
126,7 C 212,0 C 227,0 C 278,1 C 278,1C 271779 kg/h 407,2 C 542,0C 532,0C 770,5C 869,4C 993,3C
MCP 91,38 89,08 89,08 89,08 74,61 74,61 74,61 MCP
SR-Air1 SR-Air2 New LPS new Air SR-BFW SR-Reh1 SR-Reh2 SR-airProc SR-GN 208537
7792 kW 4552 kW 0 kW 11507 kW 12005 kW 17793 kW 7378 kW 9244 kW
lost heat pickup= 1740 kW MCP 2,30 2922 16,37 61,26
29,0 C 157,7 C 458,0 C 350,0 C 175,0C 322,1C
103-B Flue Gas